This document provides an overview of MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple Output) radar. MIMO radar uses multiple transmit and receive antennas. This allows it to achieve higher angular resolution than traditional phased array radars with fewer antennas. MIMO radar works by having receive antennas separately process signals from different transmit antennas, using techniques like time division multiplexing and binary phase modulation. The virtual array concept enables MIMO radar to greatly increase its degrees of freedom beyond the physical number of antennas. Potential applications of MIMO radar include air surveillance, clutter mitigation, and moving target detection.
2. Contents
Introduction of radar
Mimo radar
Angle estimation
Principles of mimo radar
Multiplexing
Virtual array concept
Literature review
Research area
Future work
Refrences
3. INTRODUCTION
Radar is a system of transmitters and receivers that can detect,
locate and measure the speed of a target using electromagnetic
waves.
Radar perform many other tasks such as geo sensing, terrain
mapping and air traffic control.
For proper detection, the radar system must be able to distinguish the
echo signals returning from the target from the noise components.
Detection is done one can calculate the range which is the separation
between the radar system and the target
4. MIMO RADAR
MIMO radar system is a novel radar method in which MIMO stands
for Multiple Input Multiple Output.
Multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) refers to a radar with multiple
TX and multiple RX antennas. The angle resolution of a MIMO radar
with NTX TX antennas and NRX RX antennas can be made
equivalent to that of a SIMO radar with NTX × NRX RX antennas.
The MIMO radar therefore provides a cost-effective way to improve
the angle resolution of the radar of the other transmitting antennas.
5. Literature review
The first demonstration of a MIMO-like system was through the
French RIAS/SIAR (synthetic impulse and aperture radar), first
demonstrated in 1989 (Doreyet al.1989, Colin 1996, Duofanget al.2006
One of the virtues attributed to mimo radar is spatial diversity offered
by it.
The construction of filled virtual arrays from given sparse
transmit/receive arrays is the topic of discussion .
6. MIMO Antenna Configuration
Use multiple transmit and multiple receive antennas for a
single user
User data streamUser data stream
.
.
1
2
MT
.
.
.
1
2
MR
.
.
.
.
.
channel
Now this system promises enormous data rates!
7. The MIMO radar systems can be classified into two categories:
MIMO radar with colocated antennas (so called “Mono-Static” MIMO)
The target is a point target as in traditional radar systems
MIMO radar with widely separated antennas (so called “distributed” or
“Bi-Static” MIMO).
The target is regarded by each antenna from another aspect angle.
8. Angle Estimation
The signal from the TX antenna is reflected from an object (at
an angle θ with regard to the radar) and is received at both
RX antennas. The signal from the object must travel an
additional distance of dsin(θ) to reach the second RX
antenna. This corresponds to a phase difference of ω = (2π /
λ)dsin(θ) between the signals received at the two RX
antennas
11. MULTIPLEXING
The MIMO radar works by having the same set of RX
antennas process signals from transmissions by multiple TX
antennas. It is important to note that the RX antennas must
be able to separate the signals corresponding to different TX
antennas (for example, by having different TX antennas
transmit on orthogonal channels). There are different ways to
achieve this separation, and two such techniques are
discussed here:
time division multiplexing (TDM) and
binary phase modulation (BPM).
12. In TDM-MIMO, the orthogonality is in time. Each frame consists of several blocks,
with each block consisting of NTX time slots each corresponding to transmission
by one of the NTX TX antennas. In Figure, for an FMCW radar with NTX = 2,
alternate time slots are dedicated to TX1 and TX2. TDM-MIMO is the most simple
way to separate signals from the multiple TX antennas and is therefore widely
used.
.
Time-Division multiplexing
13. Binary Phase Multiplexing
The TDM-MIMO scheme previously described is simple to
implement, however, it does not use the complete
transmission capabilities of the device (because only one
transmitter is active at any time). Techniques exist which are
centered on modulating the initial phase of chirps in a frame,
which allow simultaneous transmission across multiple TX
antennas while still ensuring separation of these signals. In
BPM-MIMO, these phases are either 0º or 180º (equivalent to
multiplying each chirp by +1 or –1).
14. The Virtual Array Concept
One of the main advantages of MIMO radar is that the degrees of
freedom can be greatly increased by the concept of virtual array.
17. MIMO radar vs. phased array radar (SIMO)
item MIMO radar phased array radar
1. waveforms N orthogonal waveforms
transmitted simultaneously
from N distinct parts of the
antenna
one waveform transmitted
from the radar (coherently)
2. transmit antenna pattern
(array factor)
omni directional (except for
element pattern or subarray
pattern)
pencil beam:
θ ≈ λ/D
3. transmit antenna gain
(array factor)
G/N G
4. SNR cT/N cT
5. time on target full transmit duty cycle
(limited by coherence of
target & propagation)
limited by pencil beam
6. useful range-Doppler
space (normalized area)
1/N 1
7. number of degrees of
freedom for adaptive nulling
NM M
19. RESEARCH AREA
MIMO radar has provided a new paradigm for
signal processing research. Some of these are:
Improved target detection capability
Enhanced accuracy in angle estimation
Lower minimum detectible velocity
Direct applicability of adaptive algorithms
Enhanced spatial diversity gain
High degree of flexibility in designing beampattern
20. Future possiblities
On developing methods for real time beam pattern synthesis for tracking
targets and generalizing the beam pattern synthesis algorithms for both
narrow as well as wide band signals design of fixed cross-correlation
constant modulus signals.
There may exist some better approach to obtain the virtual array
resolution without compromising the processing gain.
21. REFRENCES
[1] Y. I. Abramovich and G. J. Frazer, “Bounds on the Volume and Height
Distributions for theMIMO Radar Ambiguity Function,” IEEE Signal Processing
Letters, Volume 15, pp. 505–508,May 2008.
[2] G. S. Antonio and D. R. Fuhrmann, “Beampattern Synthesis for Wideband
MIMO Radar Systems,” Proc. 1st. IEEE International Workshop on
Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor AdaptiveProcessing, pp. 105–108, Dec.
2005.
[3] S. P. Applebaum and D. J. Chapman, “Adaptive arrays with main beam
constraints,” IEEETrans. Ant. Prop., vol. AP-24, pp. 650–662, Sept. 1976.
[4] M. R. Bell, “Information Theory and Radar Waveform Design,” IEEE Trans. on
Information Theory, Vol 39, Issue 5, pp. 1578–1597, Sept. 1993.
[5] K. L. Bell, Y. Ephraim, and H. L. Van Trees, “A Bayesian approach to robust
adaptive beamforming”,IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc., vol. 48, pp. 386–398, Feb. 2000.
[6] D. W. Bliss and K. W. Forsythe, “Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radar and
imaging: degrees of freedom and resolution,” Proc. 37th IEEE Asilomar Conf. on
Signals, Systems, and Computers,