Theory Construction and
Evaluation
1. Quiz # 1
2. Theory Evaluation
Muhammad Saud Kharal
PhD in Social Science,
Department of Sociology Faculty of Social and
Political Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya
Indonesia
What is Theory?
 Theory is a set on interconnected
statements or propositions that explain
how two or more events or factors are
related to one another
The parts of Theory
 Concepts are building blocks of theory
 A concept is an idea expressed as a
symbol or in words
 S=d/t; height ;urbanization; poverty
 Concepts have two parts: A symbol (word
or term) and a definition
The parts of Theory
 Assumptions are statements about the
nature of things that are not observable or
testable
 For example, the concept “book” assumes
a system of writing, people who can read,
and the existence of paper
 Without such assumptions idea of a book
makes little sense
The parts of Theory
 “Racial prejudice” rests on several
assumptions
 People who make distinction among
individuals based on their racial heritage,
attach specific characteristics to
membership in a racial group, and make
judgment about goodness of these
characteristics
Relationships
 Theories contain concepts, their
definitions, and assumptions
 More specifically, theories specify how
concepts are related to one another
 R. Merton’s anomie theory of deviance
argues that people can understand
nondeviance and deviance by considering
two key concepts: the goals that a society
defines as worth pursuing and the
legitimate means to achieve these goals
Merton’s Theory
 Nondeviance occurs when people accept
cultural goals and use a socially legitimate
means to reach them
 Deviance occurs when this is not the case
 Merton made a causal statement
(proposition) about the expected
relationship among concepts (variables)
The aspects of Theory
 Direction of reasoning
 The level of social reality that it explains
 Whether it is substantial or formal
Direction of theorizing
 Deductive approach
 Inductive approach
Level of Theory
 Micro-level theory deals with small slices of time,
space , or number of people
 Social Bond Theory (Hirschi, 1969)
 Meso-level theory attempts to link macro and
micro levels or to operate at an intermediate
level. Theories of social movements,
organizations, or communities are often at this
level (Merton’s theory)
 Macro-level theory concerns the operation of
larger aggregates such as social institutions.
Entire cultural systems, and whole societies
Macro/Micro relationship
 Until recently, one the major division of
20th century in sociology theory was
conflict between Macro/Micro
 Many argued polemically that one level is
more fundamental than the other
 There is mutual interrelations between
micro and macro levels
Social Structure and Social Learning Theory
Society
Community
Age Family
Sex Peers
Race School
Class Others
Differential
Association
Definitions
Imitation
Other Learning
Variables
Individual
Behavior
Social Structure Social Learning
Criminal Behavior
Conforming Behavior
Focus of Theory
 Substantive theory is developed for a
specific area of social concern, such as
delinquent gangs, strikes, divorce, or race
relationships
 Formal theory is developed for a broad
conceptual area in general theory, such as
deviance, socialization, or power
Focus of Theory
 If you want to generate a substantive
theory, then you should think of cases
within the same substantive area. You
might compare several gangs, but you do
not have to theorize about deviance in
general
 If you want to generate a formal theory,
then you should compare cases within the
same form area. You might examine
various forms of deviance (medical,
folkways, legal, etc)
Criteria for Evaluating Theory
 Logical consistency
 Propositions of a theory have to be
logically stated and internally consistent
 Theory that state that criminals are
biologically deficient cannot claim that
socialization is the cause of criminal
behavior
 The Scope of a theory refers to the range
of phenomena which it proposes to explain
 A theory that accounts only for the crime
of check forgery may be accurate, but it is
obviously very limited in scope
Criteria for Evaluating Theory
Criteria for Evaluating Theory
 Parsimony (simplicity of theory’s
structure). The theory based on fewest
assumptions and requiring the fewest
propositions is considered the superior
theory
 A theory which proposes that all crime are
caused by low self-control is much more
parsimonious than a theory that requires a
set of multiple hypotheses to explain crime
Differential Association is based upon
these nine postulates:
1. Criminal behavior is learned
2. Criminal behavior is learned in interaction with others
persons in a process of communication
3. The principal part of the learning of criminal behavior
occurs within intimate personal groups
4. When criminal behavior is learned, the learning includes
techniques of committing the crime, which are sometimes
very complicated, sometimes simple and the specific
direction of motives, drives, rationalizations, and attitudes
5. The specific direction of motives and drives is learned
from definitions of the legal codes as favorable or
unfavorable to committing deviant acts
6. A person becomes delinquent because of an excess of
definitions favorable to violation of law over definitions
unfavorable to violation of the law
7. Differential associations may vary in frequency,
duration, priority, and intensity.
 Priority - the age of children when first understand
criminal behavior
 Intensity - the level of prestige associated with a
person or group
 Frequency - number of contacts a person has with
groups that condone criminal behavior
 Duration - the length of time the relationship will last
and so its influence over the persons behavior
Differential Association is based upon
these nine postulates:
8. The process of learning criminal behavior by
association with criminal and anticriminal
patterns involves all of the mechanisms that are
involved in any other learning
9. While criminal behavior is an expression of
general needs and values, it is not explained by
those general needs and values, since non
criminal behavior is an expression of the same
needs and values
Differential Association is based upon these
nine postulates:
 Testability by objective and repeatable
evidence (theory which are untestable are
not scientific)
 Example: If we states that low-self
control is the failure to refrain from crime,
we cannot state that low-self control is a
cause of law violation
Criteria for Evaluating Theory
Untestable theories
 Propositions are open-ended so that any
contradictory empirical evidence can be
interpreted or re-interpreted to support
the theory
 A theory may propose that males who
robe banks are motivated by an
unconscious impulse to resolve their guilt
over their childhood sexual attraction
toward their mothers
Untestable theories
 If research finds enough bank robbers who
fit this description, then the theory is
supported
 If research uncover that bank robbers
claim their only motive is money then that
does not mean that the theory is rejected
 Denial of these feeling by robbers supports
the theory, because the same unconscious
impulse that motivated them to rob also
rendered them unconscious of their true
motivation
Untestable Theories
 A theory may also be untestable because
its concepts are not measurable by
observable events
 If a theory proposes that people commit
crimes because they are obsessed by
invisible demons, there is no way to prove
it
 Imitation in social learning theory is
observable thing
 Empirical validity means that a theory
has been supported by research evidence
 None of the theories is found to be entirely
true or false
 The questions is, what degree of empirical
support does the theory have (weak or
strong)
Criteria for Evaluating Theory
 Usefulness and Policy implications
 Every criminological theory implies a
therapy or policy
 The better the theory explain the problem,
the better it is able to guide efforts to
solve the problem
Criteria for Evaluating Theory
In class-assignment # 2(Extracredit)
 Level of analysis (macro/micro/meso)
 Formal/Substantive
 Scope/Parsimony/logical consistency

Merton's theory

  • 1.
    Theory Construction and Evaluation 1.Quiz # 1 2. Theory Evaluation Muhammad Saud Kharal PhD in Social Science, Department of Sociology Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya Indonesia
  • 2.
    What is Theory? Theory is a set on interconnected statements or propositions that explain how two or more events or factors are related to one another
  • 3.
    The parts ofTheory  Concepts are building blocks of theory  A concept is an idea expressed as a symbol or in words  S=d/t; height ;urbanization; poverty  Concepts have two parts: A symbol (word or term) and a definition
  • 4.
    The parts ofTheory  Assumptions are statements about the nature of things that are not observable or testable  For example, the concept “book” assumes a system of writing, people who can read, and the existence of paper  Without such assumptions idea of a book makes little sense
  • 5.
    The parts ofTheory  “Racial prejudice” rests on several assumptions  People who make distinction among individuals based on their racial heritage, attach specific characteristics to membership in a racial group, and make judgment about goodness of these characteristics
  • 6.
    Relationships  Theories containconcepts, their definitions, and assumptions  More specifically, theories specify how concepts are related to one another  R. Merton’s anomie theory of deviance argues that people can understand nondeviance and deviance by considering two key concepts: the goals that a society defines as worth pursuing and the legitimate means to achieve these goals
  • 7.
    Merton’s Theory  Nondevianceoccurs when people accept cultural goals and use a socially legitimate means to reach them  Deviance occurs when this is not the case  Merton made a causal statement (proposition) about the expected relationship among concepts (variables)
  • 8.
    The aspects ofTheory  Direction of reasoning  The level of social reality that it explains  Whether it is substantial or formal
  • 9.
    Direction of theorizing Deductive approach  Inductive approach
  • 10.
    Level of Theory Micro-level theory deals with small slices of time, space , or number of people  Social Bond Theory (Hirschi, 1969)  Meso-level theory attempts to link macro and micro levels or to operate at an intermediate level. Theories of social movements, organizations, or communities are often at this level (Merton’s theory)  Macro-level theory concerns the operation of larger aggregates such as social institutions. Entire cultural systems, and whole societies
  • 11.
    Macro/Micro relationship  Untilrecently, one the major division of 20th century in sociology theory was conflict between Macro/Micro  Many argued polemically that one level is more fundamental than the other  There is mutual interrelations between micro and macro levels
  • 12.
    Social Structure andSocial Learning Theory Society Community Age Family Sex Peers Race School Class Others Differential Association Definitions Imitation Other Learning Variables Individual Behavior Social Structure Social Learning Criminal Behavior Conforming Behavior
  • 13.
    Focus of Theory Substantive theory is developed for a specific area of social concern, such as delinquent gangs, strikes, divorce, or race relationships  Formal theory is developed for a broad conceptual area in general theory, such as deviance, socialization, or power
  • 14.
    Focus of Theory If you want to generate a substantive theory, then you should think of cases within the same substantive area. You might compare several gangs, but you do not have to theorize about deviance in general  If you want to generate a formal theory, then you should compare cases within the same form area. You might examine various forms of deviance (medical, folkways, legal, etc)
  • 15.
    Criteria for EvaluatingTheory  Logical consistency  Propositions of a theory have to be logically stated and internally consistent  Theory that state that criminals are biologically deficient cannot claim that socialization is the cause of criminal behavior
  • 16.
     The Scopeof a theory refers to the range of phenomena which it proposes to explain  A theory that accounts only for the crime of check forgery may be accurate, but it is obviously very limited in scope Criteria for Evaluating Theory
  • 17.
    Criteria for EvaluatingTheory  Parsimony (simplicity of theory’s structure). The theory based on fewest assumptions and requiring the fewest propositions is considered the superior theory  A theory which proposes that all crime are caused by low self-control is much more parsimonious than a theory that requires a set of multiple hypotheses to explain crime
  • 18.
    Differential Association isbased upon these nine postulates: 1. Criminal behavior is learned 2. Criminal behavior is learned in interaction with others persons in a process of communication 3. The principal part of the learning of criminal behavior occurs within intimate personal groups 4. When criminal behavior is learned, the learning includes techniques of committing the crime, which are sometimes very complicated, sometimes simple and the specific direction of motives, drives, rationalizations, and attitudes 5. The specific direction of motives and drives is learned from definitions of the legal codes as favorable or unfavorable to committing deviant acts
  • 19.
    6. A personbecomes delinquent because of an excess of definitions favorable to violation of law over definitions unfavorable to violation of the law 7. Differential associations may vary in frequency, duration, priority, and intensity.  Priority - the age of children when first understand criminal behavior  Intensity - the level of prestige associated with a person or group  Frequency - number of contacts a person has with groups that condone criminal behavior  Duration - the length of time the relationship will last and so its influence over the persons behavior Differential Association is based upon these nine postulates:
  • 20.
    8. The processof learning criminal behavior by association with criminal and anticriminal patterns involves all of the mechanisms that are involved in any other learning 9. While criminal behavior is an expression of general needs and values, it is not explained by those general needs and values, since non criminal behavior is an expression of the same needs and values Differential Association is based upon these nine postulates:
  • 21.
     Testability byobjective and repeatable evidence (theory which are untestable are not scientific)  Example: If we states that low-self control is the failure to refrain from crime, we cannot state that low-self control is a cause of law violation Criteria for Evaluating Theory
  • 22.
    Untestable theories  Propositionsare open-ended so that any contradictory empirical evidence can be interpreted or re-interpreted to support the theory  A theory may propose that males who robe banks are motivated by an unconscious impulse to resolve their guilt over their childhood sexual attraction toward their mothers
  • 23.
    Untestable theories  Ifresearch finds enough bank robbers who fit this description, then the theory is supported  If research uncover that bank robbers claim their only motive is money then that does not mean that the theory is rejected  Denial of these feeling by robbers supports the theory, because the same unconscious impulse that motivated them to rob also rendered them unconscious of their true motivation
  • 24.
    Untestable Theories  Atheory may also be untestable because its concepts are not measurable by observable events  If a theory proposes that people commit crimes because they are obsessed by invisible demons, there is no way to prove it  Imitation in social learning theory is observable thing
  • 25.
     Empirical validitymeans that a theory has been supported by research evidence  None of the theories is found to be entirely true or false  The questions is, what degree of empirical support does the theory have (weak or strong) Criteria for Evaluating Theory
  • 26.
     Usefulness andPolicy implications  Every criminological theory implies a therapy or policy  The better the theory explain the problem, the better it is able to guide efforts to solve the problem Criteria for Evaluating Theory
  • 27.
    In class-assignment #2(Extracredit)  Level of analysis (macro/micro/meso)  Formal/Substantive  Scope/Parsimony/logical consistency