Introducing the basics of the Structurational theory whose author was Anthony Giddens. What's covered include; the key concepts, historical background, detailed breakdown, assumptions, strengths and weaknesses of the theory.
Introducing the basics of the Structurational theory whose author was Anthony Giddens. What's covered include; the key concepts, historical background, detailed breakdown, assumptions, strengths and weaknesses of the theory.
this powerpoint presentation is for better understanding of Ethnomethodology. In this presentation ethnomethodology is compared with phenomenology and mainstream social science .the criticism of mainstream sociology by ethnomethodologist is also a part of the presentation. the last slide consist of criticism of enthomethodology
it describes ethnomethodology as a method as well as a theory. This very concise and precise presentation helps one to understand the real meaning of ethnomethodology.
This presentation is on Indian contemporary sociological thinker named Akshay Ramanlal Desai. Desai alone among Indian sociologists has consistently applied Marxist methods in his treatment of Indian social structure and its processes. He is a doctrinaire Marxist. He rejects any interpretations of tradition with reference to religion, rituals and festivities. It is essentially a secular phenomenon.
University First Year level revision notes on Classical Sociological Theory. Contains notes on Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim among others. All notes come from university lecture notes and online research. Includes quotes from sociologists, a history of sociology, keywords and theories and ideas.
1
3
Chapter 7 SummaryCHAPTER SUMMARY
Contemporary Integrative Theories
This chapter describes theoretical efforts to integrate macro-level theories that deal with the structures and institutions of society with micro-level theories of everyday life. These integrative theories aim to overcome the limitations of either approach by balancing our understanding that individuals are free to interpret, influence, and act with our understanding of organizational and institutional constraints, power, and social reproduction. Richard Emerson’s exchange theory, Anthony Giddens’s structuration theory, and Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of practice each take distinctive approaches to this central problem in social theory.
A More Integrated Exchange Theory
Building on the work of George Homans, Richard Emerson (1925-1983) asserted that power was central to exchange, that actors are not entirely rational, and that social relations and networks could be used to explain both micro- and macro-level phenomena. Emerson’s exchange theory focuses on the rewards and costs of social interaction and takes social structure as a variable dependent on exchange. The theory assumes that people act rationally within the context of situations, thereby allowing the situations to occur. It also assumes that as people become satiated with the rewards they obtain from a situation, those situations will be of declining importance to them. Last, it assumes that benefits obtained depend on the benefits of exchange.
According to Emerson, social structure is produced and reproduced through exchange mechanisms. The exchange network is a web of social relationships that involves a number of individuals or groups. All individuals and groups have opportunities to exchange with others. These relationships interrelate with one another to form network structure. Each exchange relationship is embedded in a larger exchange network.
In exchange theory, power is defined as the potential cost that one actor can induce another to accept. Dependency is the potential cost that an actor is willing to accept within an exchange relationship. Mutual dependencies condition the nature of an interaction. When there is an imbalance of power and dependency between two actors, the one with more power and less dependence will have an advantage that can be used to collect rewards or distribute punishments. Exchange theorists argue that the relative power of an actor is determined by the position of an actor in an exchange network. The amount of dependence of the entire structure on the position will determine its power. This perspective can be used to examine both the social behavior of individuals and social structure. It can also be used to examine how changes in power-dependency at the micro-level affect macro-level phenomena and vice-versa.
Structuration Theory
Structuration theory focuses on the mutual constitution of structure and agency. Anthony Giddens (1938- ) argues that structure an.
this powerpoint presentation is for better understanding of Ethnomethodology. In this presentation ethnomethodology is compared with phenomenology and mainstream social science .the criticism of mainstream sociology by ethnomethodologist is also a part of the presentation. the last slide consist of criticism of enthomethodology
it describes ethnomethodology as a method as well as a theory. This very concise and precise presentation helps one to understand the real meaning of ethnomethodology.
This presentation is on Indian contemporary sociological thinker named Akshay Ramanlal Desai. Desai alone among Indian sociologists has consistently applied Marxist methods in his treatment of Indian social structure and its processes. He is a doctrinaire Marxist. He rejects any interpretations of tradition with reference to religion, rituals and festivities. It is essentially a secular phenomenon.
University First Year level revision notes on Classical Sociological Theory. Contains notes on Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim among others. All notes come from university lecture notes and online research. Includes quotes from sociologists, a history of sociology, keywords and theories and ideas.
1
3
Chapter 7 SummaryCHAPTER SUMMARY
Contemporary Integrative Theories
This chapter describes theoretical efforts to integrate macro-level theories that deal with the structures and institutions of society with micro-level theories of everyday life. These integrative theories aim to overcome the limitations of either approach by balancing our understanding that individuals are free to interpret, influence, and act with our understanding of organizational and institutional constraints, power, and social reproduction. Richard Emerson’s exchange theory, Anthony Giddens’s structuration theory, and Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of practice each take distinctive approaches to this central problem in social theory.
A More Integrated Exchange Theory
Building on the work of George Homans, Richard Emerson (1925-1983) asserted that power was central to exchange, that actors are not entirely rational, and that social relations and networks could be used to explain both micro- and macro-level phenomena. Emerson’s exchange theory focuses on the rewards and costs of social interaction and takes social structure as a variable dependent on exchange. The theory assumes that people act rationally within the context of situations, thereby allowing the situations to occur. It also assumes that as people become satiated with the rewards they obtain from a situation, those situations will be of declining importance to them. Last, it assumes that benefits obtained depend on the benefits of exchange.
According to Emerson, social structure is produced and reproduced through exchange mechanisms. The exchange network is a web of social relationships that involves a number of individuals or groups. All individuals and groups have opportunities to exchange with others. These relationships interrelate with one another to form network structure. Each exchange relationship is embedded in a larger exchange network.
In exchange theory, power is defined as the potential cost that one actor can induce another to accept. Dependency is the potential cost that an actor is willing to accept within an exchange relationship. Mutual dependencies condition the nature of an interaction. When there is an imbalance of power and dependency between two actors, the one with more power and less dependence will have an advantage that can be used to collect rewards or distribute punishments. Exchange theorists argue that the relative power of an actor is determined by the position of an actor in an exchange network. The amount of dependence of the entire structure on the position will determine its power. This perspective can be used to examine both the social behavior of individuals and social structure. It can also be used to examine how changes in power-dependency at the micro-level affect macro-level phenomena and vice-versa.
Structuration Theory
Structuration theory focuses on the mutual constitution of structure and agency. Anthony Giddens (1938- ) argues that structure an.
Toward a Psychology of HumanAgencyAlbert BanduraStanfo.docxedwardmarivel
Toward a Psychology of Human
Agency
Albert Bandura
Stanford University
ABSTRACT—This article presents an agentic theory of hu-
man development, adaptation, and change. The evolu-
tionary emergence of advanced symbolizing capacity
enabled humans to transcend the dictates of their imme-
diate environment and made them unique in their power to
shape their life circumstances and the courses their lives
take. In this conception, people are contributors to their
life circumstances, not just products of them. Social cog-
nitive theory rejects a duality between human agency and
social structure. People create social systems, and these
systems, in turn, organize and influence people’s lives. This
article discusses the core properties of human agency, the
different forms it takes, its ontological and epistemological
status, its development and role in causal structures, its
growing primacy in the coevolution process, and its influ-
ential exercise at individual and collective levels across
diverse spheres of life and cultural systems.
Conceptions of human nature have changed markedly over time.
In the early theological conceptions, human nature was ordained
by original divine design. Evolutionism transformed the con-
ception to one in which human nature is shaped by environ-
mental pressures acting on random gene mutations and
reproductive recombinations. This nonteleological process is
devoid of deliberate plans or purposes. The symbolic ability to
comprehend, predict, and alter the course of events confers
considerable functional advantages. The evolutionary emer-
gence of language and abstract and deliberative cognitive ca-
pacities provided the neuronal structure for supplanting aimless
environmental selection with cognitive agency. Human fore-
bears evolved into a sentient agentic species. Their advanced
symbolizing capacity enabled humans to transcend the dictates
of their immediate environment and made them unique in their
power to shape their life circumstances and the course of their
lives. Through cognitive self-regulation, humans can create
visualized futures that act on the present; construct, evaluate,
and modify alternative courses of action to secure valued out-
comes; and override environmental influences. In a later sec-
tion, this article discusses the growing ascendancy of human
agency in the coevolution process through the force of social and
technological evolution.
CORE PROPERTIES OF HUMAN AGENCY
Social cognitive theory adopts an agentic perspective toward
human development, adaptation, and change (Bandura, 1986,
2001). To be an agent is to influence intentionally one’s func-
tioning and life circumstances. In this view, personal influence
is part of the causal structure. People are self-organizing, pro-
active, self-regulating, and self-reflecting. They are not simply
onlookers of their behavior. They are contributors to their life
circumstances, not just products of them.
There ...
نظرية التشكيل البنائي عند أنتوني جيدنز رفض الرؤية الأحادية للتفسيرحسن قروق
Constructional collection theory at Antony gednaz (rejection of unity vision for explanation)
نظرية التشكيل البنائي عند أنتوني جيدنز رفض الرؤية الأحادية للتفسير
المؤلف: Yahyah Khairallah Auda يحيى خيرالله عودة
ﺎﻠﻤجلة: Al-Mustansiriya Journal of Arts مجلة آداب المستنصرية ISSN: 10860258 السنة: 2012الاصدار: 59 الصفحات: 1-20
الجامعة: Al-Mustansyriah University الجامعة المستنصرية - الجامعة المستنصرية
One Health Governance and the Social Sciences: Enhancing coherence, accountab...Global Risk Forum GRFDavos
Presentation at 3rd GRF One Health Summit 2015
Plenary V: Social Challenges and Opportunities for Effective One Health Governance
Andreas RECHKEMMER, Professor and American Humane Endowed Chair, University of Denver, Denver, USA
MAX WEBER Key Concepts I Sociology is a science which at.docxandreecapon
MAX WEBER: Key Concepts I
Sociology is a “science which attempts the interpretive understanding of social action to arrive
at a causal explanation of its course and effects.” While the subject matter of sociology
may overlap with history, it focuses on generalizable uniformities in social action
rather than the explanation of particular events, actions, and personalities.
Verstehen, meaning “understanding” in German, is the name Weber gives to the method of
interpretive sociology. He advocates studying social life by way of understanding the
subjective meanings that people give to their own social actions and those of others.
In fact, he considered this method of understanding the subjective states of mind of
individuals the basis for a scientific sociology. He identifies two kinds of understanding:
1) direct observational understanding of the subjective meaning of any given
individual act, its intention and 2) explanatory understanding, which looks at the
context of actions to discover the complex sets of meanings that comprise the
motivation behind individual actions in particular circumstances. He calls this complex
set of meanings a motive. Though this method of understanding is continuous with
the ways we constantly interpret other people’s behavior in our everyday lives,
sociology aims to do so in a more rigorous and systematic way—and often on a larger
scale. As it’s not feasible to interpret what’s in many heads all at once, to approximate
this method for understanding collective social life, Weber believes we need to employ
ideal types to classify different kinds of social action and their results according to the
similarities of individuals’ meanings and motivations.
Ideal Types are idealized concepts formulated by sociologists to capture a part of social reality,
which is much too complex to be understood in its entirety. Since actual situations
vary more or less in innumerable different ways from case to case, ideal types simplify
a messy reality by isolating certain aspects of institutions or social practices that are
relevant to a particular study and allow for analysis and comparison. Due to their
complexity, you should not expect to find ideal types in their pure form in real
situations. Rather, they act as simplifications that are useful for classifying and
comprehending significant parts of social reality. They can offer a window onto reality
that helps us understand the patterns within the messiness. For instance, Weber’s
notions of traditional, charismatic, and legal-rational forms of authority are ideal types:
SOC 260 Classical Social Theory Drexel University
Fall 2015 Professor Howard
authority figures will rarely fall neatly in any one of these categories but will probably
fall somewhere in between (in a grey area). Still, by constructing these ideal types,
Weber hopes to generalize about how authority ope ...
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
3. A prominent scholar & British sociologist
Anthony Giddens, who developed the concept of
structuration.
Structuration theory attempts to understand
human social behaviour by resolvig the
competing viewsof structure-agency & macro-
micro perspective.
This is achieved by studying the processes that
take place at the interface between the actor
and the structure.
4. Structuration means studying the ways in
which social systems are produced and
reproduced in social interacton.
Giddens defines structuration as "the
structuring of social relations across time and
space, in virtue of the duality of structure”.
Structuration is a processes, modify,
developed by the actor.
5. The term structure referred generally to "rules
and resources" and more specifically to "the
structuring properties allowing the 'binding' of
time-space in social systems".
Giddens uses "the duality of structure" to
emphasize structure's nature as both medium
and outcome.
Social structures contain agents and or are the
product of past actions of agents. Giddens holds
this duality, alongside "structure" and "system,"
as the core of structuration theory.
6. The duality of structure is essentially a
process whereby agents and structures
mutually enact social systems, and social
systems in turn become part of that duality.
7. Structures are the "rules and resources" embedded
in agents' memory traces. Agents call upon their
memory traces of which they are "knowledgeable"
to perform social actions. "Knowledgeability" refers
to "what agents know about what they do, and why
they do it." Giddens divides memory traces
(structures-within-knowledgeability) into three
types:
• Domination (power): Giddens also uses "resources"
to refer to this type. "Authoritative resources" allow
agents to control persons, whereas "allocative
resources" allow agents to control material objects.
8. • Signification (meaning)
• Legitimation (norms): Giddens sometimes
uses "rules" to refer to either signification or
legitimation. An agent draws upon these
stocks of knowledge via memory to inform
him or herself about the external context,
conditions, and potential results of an
action.)
• When an agent uses these structures for
social interactions, they are called modalities
and present themselves in the forms of
facility (domination), interpretive scheme or
communication (signification) and norms or
sanctions (legitimation).
9. • Agency, as Giddens calls it, is human action.
• Agency is critical to both the reproduction and
the transformation of society. Another way to
explain this concept is by what Giddens calls the
"reflexive monitoring of actions.“
• "Reflexive monitoring" refers to agents' ability
to monitor their actions and those actions'
settings and contexts. Monitoring is an essential
characteristic of agency.
10. • Actions are constrained by agents inherent
capabilities and their understandings of
available actions and external limitations.
Practical consciousness and discursive
consciousness inform these abilities.
• Practical consciousness is the knowledgeability
that an agent brings to the tasks required by
everyday life, which is so integrated as to be
hardly noticed. Reflexive monitoring occurs at
the level of practical consciousness. Discursive
consciousness is the ability to verbally express
knowledge.
11. • Alongside practical and discursive
consciousness, Giddens recognizes actors as
having reflexive, contextual knowledge, and
that habitual, widespread use of
knowledgeability makes structures become
institutionalized.