Measuring Student Success: Tutoring and Learning Centers

Measuring Student Success:Measuring Student Success:
Tutoring & Learning CentersTutoring & Learning Centers
NCLCA WOWS
April 2012
Dr. Lisa D’Adamo-Weinstein & Dr. Tacy L. Holliday
WEBINAR & ONLINE WORKSHOP SERIESWEBINAR & ONLINE WORKSHOP SERIES
(WOWS)(WOWS)

Welcome to WOW
• Webinar
– A topic overview with practical ideas to
get you thinking about the assessment
process.
– Covers a lot of material quickly.
– You’ll get access to the slides and to the
class recordings so you can spend more
time with any section of interest.

Welcome to WOW
• Online Workshop
– This part of the WOW allows you to “Learn by
doing.” There will be additional resources to
prompt your thinking and online discussions.
Answer the discussion questions will help you
put into practice the material that was covered
in the webinar.
– Culminates in the “Putting it Into Practice”
section where you’ll develop a short action
plan for your assessment.
– Gives you an opportunity to ask questions
about assessment and get support.

Click to show/hide Control Panel. (a)Click to show/hide Control Panel. (a)
Click to maximize/minimize theClick to maximize/minimize the
GoToTraining Viewer. (b)GoToTraining Viewer. (b)
Click to use drawing tools. (c)Click to use drawing tools. (c)
Click to raise/lower hand. (d)Click to raise/lower hand. (d)
Click to mute/unmute your line. (e)Click to mute/unmute your line. (e)
Attendee List. (f)Attendee List. (f)
Audio: Choose how you want to join the audioAudio: Choose how you want to join the audio
portion of the training. (g)portion of the training. (g)
Materials: Documents and links in this section areMaterials: Documents and links in this section are
provided by the organizer.(h)provided by the organizer.(h)
Chat: Where you can post questions or comments.Chat: Where you can post questions or comments.
(i)(i)

Measuring Student Success:Measuring Student Success:
Tutoring & Learning CentersTutoring & Learning Centers
• Introductions to the Class & Training
• The Big Picture
o What is assessment?
o Why should I assess?
• Developing An Assessment Plan
o Modes of Assessment
o Tools for Assessment
– Why should I assess?
– How do I assess?

Introduce yourselfIntroduce yourself
and state oneand state one
challenge you facechallenge you face
or one question youor one question you
have abouthave about
assessment.assessment.

THE
BIG PICTURE
What is assessment?
What are the challenges?
Why should I assess?

WHAT IS ASSESSMENT
Assessment is a continuous process aimed at understanding and
improving student learning and success in a manner that aligns
institutional missions/goals with the design and delivery of
programs and services in tutoring/learning centers.
In Tutoring & Learning Centers

Assessment makes a differencemakes a difference when it begins
with issues of use and illuminates questionsilluminates questions
that peoplepeople really care aboutcare about.
Through assessment, educators meet
responsibilitiesresponsibilities to studentsto students and toto the publicpublic.
Assessment fosters wider improvementwider improvement when
representativesrepresentatives from acrossacross the educationaleducational
communitycommunity are involved.
Assessment is most likely to lead tolead to
improvementimprovement when it is part of a largerlarger set ofset of
conditionsconditions that promote change.
Assumptions – What Assessment Can Do
SOURCE: http://www.aahe.org/assessment/principl.htm

Assessment works best when the programsprograms it
seeks to improve have clearclear,, explicitlyexplicitly statedstated
purposespurposes.
Assessment worksworks bestbest whenwhen it is ongoingongoing
not episodic.
Assessment requires attention to outcomesattention to outcomes
but also and equally to the experiencesexperiences that
lead to those outcomes.
Assessment is most effectiveeffective when it reflectsreflects
an understanding of learningunderstanding of learning as
multidimensionalmultidimensional, integratedintegrated, and revealed
in performance over timeperformance over time.
Assumptions – How Assessment Works Best
SOURCE: http://www.aahe.org/assessment/principl.htm

The Higher Learning Commission (HLC), has identified five fundamental
questions for institutions to use in discussing and defining assessment:
•How are your stated student learning outcomes appropriate to your mission,
programs, and degrees?
•What evidence do you have that students achieve your stated learning
outcomes?
•In what ways do you analyze and use evidence of student learning?
•How do you ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning?
•How do you evaluate and improve the effectiveness of your efforts to assess
and improve student learning?
http://www.oaklandcc.edu/assessment/Definition.htm
QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER

InstitutionalInstitutional
SupportSupport
&&
IntegrationIntegration
MISSION & GOALSMISSION & GOALS
STUDENTS’ NEEDSSTUDENTS’ NEEDS
PROGRAMSPROGRAMS
& SERVICES& SERVICES
STAFFING
&
STAFFING
&
RESOURCES
RESOURCES
ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT
&&
EVALUATIONEVALUATION
Qualitative
& Quantitative
Summative
& Formative
Persistence/
Graduation Rates
Annual/Quarterly
Reports
Institutional
Research
NADE
Self-Evaluation Guides
Cassazza
& Silverman
Faculty/Staff
Performance
Impact/
Effectiveness
Demographic/
Use Statistics
Case
Studies
Benchmarking
Cost/Benefit
Analysis
Program
Design
Outcomes
Existing
Research
Focus
Groups
Course End
Surveys

Part 1. MISSION
The learning assistance program must develop, record,develop, record,
disseminate, implement and regularly reviewdisseminate, implement and regularly review its
mission and goals. The learning assistance mission
statement must be consistent with the mission and goals of
the institution and with the standards of this document.
The mission statement must address the purpose of the
learning assistance program, the population it serves, the
programs and services it provides, and the goals the
program is to accomplish.
CAS Standards for Learning CentersCAS Standards for Learning Centers
SOURCE - http://www.nade.net/site/documents/CAS/CAS.pdf

Part 4. ORGANIZATION and MANAGEMENT
The learning assistance program must be structuredstructured
purposefully and managed effectively to achieve statedpurposefully and managed effectively to achieve stated
goalsgoals. Evidence of appropriate structure must include current
and accessible policies and procedures, written job
descriptions and performance expectations for all employees,
functional work flow graphics or organizational charts, and
service delivery expectations.

Part 13. ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION
The learning assistance program must undergo regular andregular and
systematic qualitative and quantitative evaluationssystematic qualitative and quantitative evaluations to
determinedetermine to what degree the stated mission and goals aredegree the stated mission and goals are
being metbeing met. The learning assistance program should have the
ability to collect and analyze datacollect and analyze data through its own resourcesown resources
and through access to appropriate data generated by theappropriate data generated by the
institutioninstitution. Periodic evaluations of the learning assistance
program and services may be performed by on campus experts
and outside consultants and disseminated to appropriate
administrators.

Alexander and Serafass’ (1999)
planning model for educational
institutions.
Alexander, W.F., Serfass, R.W. (1999). Futuring Tools for Strategic Quality Planning in Education. Quality Press; Milwaukee.

The Assessment RealitiesThe Assessment Realities
• Annual/Quarterly Reports
• Demographic/Usage Statistics
• Retention/Completion Rate
• Faculty/Staff Performance
• Budget/Staffing
• Accreditation
• Improve Effectiveness & Efficiency
• Benchmarking/Standards
• Program Design
• Align Mission and Goals

Key
Ideas:
1)Assessment is
valuable to the
extent that it is
considered
within the larger
context of
mission & goals.2)We don’t have
to “reinvent the
wheel” but we do
need to customize
it for our
contexts.
3) We need to
assess in order
to engage in
“honest
advocacy” in
revising and
improving
programs and
services, and in
recognizing
staff
performance.

THE
BIG PICTURE
Developing
An Assessment Plan
Modes of Assessment
Tools for Assessment

A CLOSER LOOK:
DEVELOPING AN ASSESSMENT PLAN
How do I assess?

Developing an Assessment Plan
1. Articulate the Purpose of Assessment
2. Align With & For Success
3. Select Appropriate Measures/Data-gathering
Methods
4. Organize, Analyze & Interpret Results
5. Make Recommendations for Action
Casazza & Silverman (1996)
Learning Assistance & Development Education: A Guide for Effective Practice

Purpose of AssessmentPurpose of Assessment
• Budget/Staffing
• Accreditation
• Program Design

Identify Biggest StakeholdersIdentify Biggest Stakeholders
• Budget/Staffing
• Accreditation
• Program Design
Student (S)Student (S) Center(C)Center(C) Institution (I)Institution (I)
(C)(C) (I)(I)
(C)(C) (I)(I)
(I)(I)
(C)(C)
(C)(C) (I)(I)
(C)(C) (I)(I)
(I)(I)
(C)(C)
(S)(S) (C)(C) (I)(I)
(S)(S) (C)(C)

PrioritizingPrioritizing
AssessmentAssessment • Retention/Completion Rate
• Program Design
• Budget/Staffing
• Accreditation
Institution (I)Institution (I)
Center (C)Center (C)
Center (C)Center (C) Institution (I)Institution (I)
Student (S)Student (S) Center (C)Center (C)
Student (S)Student (S) Center (C)Center (C) Institution (I)Institution (I)
1st 2nd
Make sureMake sure
everything lineseverything lines
up/realign &up/realign &
adjust asadjust as
necessarynecessary
Get necessary dataGet necessary data
to balanceto balance
INTERNAL &INTERNAL &
EXTERNALEXTERNAL
tensions/needstensions/needs
Center & InstitutionalCenter & Institutional
forces feed eachforces feed each
otherother
3rd
4th
And all should alignAnd all should align
with the work we dowith the work we do
in our centers andin our centers and
with/for our studentswith/for our students

Center (C)Center (C)
Center (C)Center (C) Institution (I)Institution (I)Student (S)Student (S) Center (C)Center (C)

PrioritizingPrioritizing
AssessmentAssessment
by Stakeholderby Stakeholder
• Program Design
• Budget/Staffing
• Accreditation
Center(C)Center(C)
Center(C)Center(C) Institution (I)Institution (I)
Student (S)Student (S) Center(C)Center(C)
Student (S)Student (S) Center(C)Center(C) Institution (I)Institution (I)

EXAMPLE - Aligning for Success
What does student success “look like” for your institution?
Examples:
•the student demonstrates knowledge of resources
available at the college and the “appropriate” use of those
resources. (Institution (I)Institution (I))
•a student that completes the course/certification
program/transfer program as desired
(Institution (I)Institution (I))
•a student that is able to figure out a way to match their
desires and abilities to their goal
(Institution (I)Institution (I))

EXAMPLE - Aligning for Success
What does student success “look like” for your learning center?
Examples:
•student’s needs were met as evidenced by their questions being answered and
the service being satisfactory. (Center (C)Center (C))
•a student who may need significant assistance when first arriving at MC but that
need declines as the student progresses through each class and through their
program of study. (Center (C)Center (C))
•a student that can demonstrate the ability to obtain knowledge pertaining to a
specific class/discipline. (Center (C)Center (C))
•being able to apply knowledge to a novel situation—demonstrating critical
thinking skills, being an independent learner and seeker of knowledge.
(Center (C)Center (C))
•the student gains proficiency in study skills. (Center (C)Center (C))
•a student that understands the explained material and is able to do similar
problems and able to explain the concept to another student. (Center (C)Center (C))

Easy Tutoring Effectiveness Measure
Purpose: Determine whether a relationship existed between tutoring and
student learning.
Goals: Minimize the amount of recordkeeping. Obtain meaningful data.
Plan:
•Focus on the immediate result of tutoring, which was classified in one of two
ways: (a) either learning had occurred, or (b) learning had not occurred.
•Student learning was operationally defined as being able to do something
correctly after working with a tutor the student could not do correctly before
working with the tutor.
•The demonstration of learning was (a) correctly solving a problem, (b)
correctly explaining a concept, or (c) correctly applying a previously unclear
or incorrect concept.
Source: Holliday, T. (Fall, 2013). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Tutoring: An Easier way . The Learning Assistance Review. National College Learning Center
Association.

Method: To determine whether learning had occurred, a simplified version of
a pretest, posttest modality was utilized.
•Pre-tutoring Condition: Student doesn’t understand or know how to do
something.
•Post-tutoring Condition: Either the student does understand or know how
to do something or the student does not.
Results:
The frequency of observations where students could demonstrate
understanding after tutoring and the frequency of observations where
students could not demonstrate understanding after tutoring were analyzed
with a Chi Square goodness of fit test. The results were significant, c2
(1, N =
1756) = 1195.68, p < .0001. Students demonstrated understanding
significantly more than not after they received tutoring.

• Results: Results were also significant when analyzed by Tutor and by Course.
Effective Tutoring Outcomes by Tutor
Tutor Yes No c2
p
Tutor 1 279 105 77.94 <.0001
Tutor 2 844 33 748.12 <.0001
Tutor 3 343 1 338.02 <.0001
Tutor 4 55 5 40.2 <.0001
Tutor 5 248 28 173.78 <.0001

Key
Ideas:
1) Use these
definitions of
success or create
your own.
2) Check the
chosen
definitions with
stakeholders and
rework as needed
to ensure
alignment with
mission/goals.
3) Let the
definitions
of success
guide what
and how you
measure.

A CLOSER LOOK: MODES OF ASSESSMENT
How do I assess?

Modes of Assessment
–Quantitative Methods:
• Demographics/usage data
• Survey/Evaluative data
• Statistical impact data
–Qualitative Methods:
• Case studies
• Interviews/Focus groups
• Written observations

Demographic/Usage Data
• Which students use your Center/Tutoring?
– Categories of interest (major, special populations,
ethnicity, age, GPA)
– Tip: Are the demographics of your Center representative
of your College/Mission? Look at who isn’t using your
Center and see how they can be reached.
• Why do they use your Center?
• How often do they use your Center?
– Repeat business
– Contact hours

DEMOGRAPHICSDEMOGRAPHICS
Purpose : Who is using the center and for what classes
Method : Survey Monkey
Results : Used to plan tutor schedule and allocate resources.

Spring
2006
Fall 2006 Spring
2007
Fall 2007
Total
Logins
7800 7638 7883 7902
Total
Number of
Unique
Students
790 846 750 774
Total
Number of
Unique
Students
for
Tutoring
265 277 286 290
Purpose : How many students visit the Center and for how many times.
Method : Access Database done when students sign in to use the Center.
Results : Used to show busyness and repeat data.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1to2Visits 3to5 6to10 11to15 16+
Spring 2006
Fall2006
Spring 2007
Fall2007

Purpose : Categorize individual appointments – how, content and # of students
Method : Excel database completed by staff after appointment.
Results : Used for annual report and to allocate resources.

Purpose : Captures Peer Coaching Program usage - content and # of students
Method : Excel database completed by Peer Coaching Program Coordinator.
Results : Used for CRLA hours of tutoring and annual report.

Survey DataSurvey Data
• What feedback do you get about your Center/Tutoring?
– Categories of interest (programs, services, location, hours.
Etc.)
• How effective are your services and programs?
– Self-reports & evaluation
– “Customer” satisfaction
– Product/Service review/improvements

SURVEY DATASURVEY DATA
Purpose : Used as checklist for what I want tutors to do. Making tutor behavior observable.
Method : Survey Monkey. Online access 24/7. Survey “push” 2x per semester.
Results : Used for report and to identify areas for improvement through training/coaching staff.
Category Spring 2011
SLC was well organized: 4.73
The hours were sufficient: 4.56
Tutors knew material well: 4.7
Tutors used various materials: 4.7
Tutors showed care and respect: 4.75
Tutors presented materials in an
understandable manner:
4.78
Student would recommend the SLC to
others:
4.83

Purpose : Used as checklist for student success behaviors and to assess those desired outcomes.
Method : Survey Monkey. Online access 24/7. Survey “push” 2x per semester.
Results : Used for report and to identify areas for improving service.
Service was satisfactory: 4.69
Student’s questions were answered: 4.67
Student’s skills improved: 4.6
Student could demonstrate
improvement by doing problems:
4.59
improvement by explaining:
4.55
improvement applying to different
situations:
4.66
Student learned to become a more
independent learner:
4.38
Student gained confidence: 4.64
Student received better grade: 4.67

Purpose : Used to assess how students are using a tool. In this case a resource/date book.
Method : Survey Monkey.
Results : Used to assess implementation success and to plan for future viability.

Basic Statistics
• Correlations (directional relationship between
two variables)
• T-tests (difference between two groups)
• ANOVAS (difference among three or more
groups)
• Chi Squares (difference between two groups
with one group being a category)

Statistical Impact Data
• Retention Data
• GPA
• Scores Between Groups (follow-up with statistical
test)
• Pre-test/Post-test on exams
• Tips:
– Correlation is not causation.
– Get follow-up data from students who did not come
back.
– Be careful with other variables.

• 76 students participating in a tutoring program
for at risk students were retained (66%). These
students used tutoring services more than those
not students who were not retained (t =5.27 p
<.001). Students with higher high school GPAs
were more likely to use tutoring (r =.198, p =.040)
Source: Laskey, M. L., & Hetzel, C. J. (Spring, 2011). Investigating factors related to retention of at-risk college students. The
Learning Assistance Review 16(1), 31-43.
Statistical ImpactStatistical Impact
Purpose : To determine retention rate based on tutoring.
Method : Used institutional research data to determine correlation and get data for t-test.
Results : Used in report and publication.

Intro to Bio Intro to Bio Intro to Bio Intro to Bio
paired with
Study Skills
67.3 62.9 59.75 70.4
Purpose : To determine whether including study skills training with a course was effective.
Method : Mean exam scores calculated. Difference among groups. ANOVA for more in-depth.
Results : Used for deciding whether the do again. Used to market the study skills.

RS101: Student Success Course
 Performance Better than Predicted (based upon CEER scores)
- RS101 cadets outperform predicted APS by approx 0.1 on 4.0 scale
- Non-RS101 cadets under perform predicted APS by approx. 0.05 (p=.0001)
 Small but Statistically Significant Positive Effect on Graduation Rates
 Increased Confidence in Ability to Apply Good Learner/Study Strategies
- Class ’04 Pre/Post SBI Scores show increased confidence in routine academic
tasks (p=.002)
Purpose : To determine effectiveness of student success course.
Method : Difference between groups. Pre/post test.
Results : Used in report, publication, and for marketing the course.

0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04
282 278 277
250
270
745 729
761
874
737
90 88 88 89 8991 87 86 82 86
PreWPM PostWPM PreComp PostComp
Purpose : To determine effectiveness of student success course.
Method : Pre/post test.
Results : Used in report, publication, and for marketing the course.
RS102 Reading
Efficiency
•Average reading gain
497 wpm
• Comprehension
constant @ 88%

Modes of Assessment
– Quantitative Methods:
• Demographics/usage data
• Survey/Evaluative data
• Statistical impact
– Qualitative Methods:
• Case studies
• Interviews/Focus groups
• Written observations

Case study and written observations.Case study and written observations.
Source: Lisa D’Adamo-Weinstein, Ph.D., Language Education, Indiana University-Bloomington,
2001. Thesis: Kaleidoscope Tapestries: Weaving Patterns from First-Generation College Women's
Telling-Stories

Study method
Upper level nursing students served as peer tutors for lower level nursing
students. The peer tutors received tutor training and guidelines for the
sessions. One-to-one tutoring sessions took place weekly for 10
weeks. Focus groups and individual interviews at the middle and end
of the semester were used to gather information about the students’
experiences.
• Results
The responses to focus groups and interview questions were analyzed.
Positive and negative experiences were categorized. Positive
experiences included enhancement of learning skills and personal
growth. Negative experiences were primarily attributed to frustration
about time commitments and mismatched learning styles.
• Conclusions
Both tutors and tutees benefited to some extent from this peer-tutoring
process. The process would be enhanced in future if the frustrations
experienced by some could be addressed.
Source: Chow, Filomena L.W., and Alice J.T. Yuen Loke. "Learning partnership -- the experience of peer tutoring among nursing
students: A qualitative study." International Journal of Nursing Studies 44.2 (2007): 237+. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Mar.
2012.
Focus groups and individual interviews.Focus groups and individual interviews.

Key
Ideas:
1) Use a variety
of modes.
2) Educate
decision-makers
about why you’re
measuring what
you’re
measuring and
not something
else.

A CLOSER LOOK: TOOLS FOR ASSESSMENT
How do I assess?

MatchingMatching
PurposePurpose
with Toolswith Tools
forfor
AssessmentAssessment
Institution (I)Institution (I) PURPOSE – My Dean wants
retention data of students who
utilize our tutoring center and she
wants to know how our students
measure up in comparison with
sister schools.
Data Gathering Methods:
•Institutional Research for graduation and retention
statistics
•Internal database of student use of center
- graduation and persistence data
•Statistical tools – descriptive statistics
For more ideas and info:
-Listserv query
-https://www.noellevitz.com/
- other sources of benchmarking data

• Program Design
PURPOSE – To ensure that
programs and staff are performing
in alignment with goals.
Data Gathering Methods:
•Surveys
•Statistical tools
-Tutor Effectiveness Measure
-Chi Square, t-test, ANOVA, correlation
•Qualitative Methods
-360 Feedback
-Focus groups, interviews, including open-
ended questions on survey.
Center(C)Center(C)
For more ideas and info:
-Journal articles on programs
-List serv query for design
-other sources of benchmarking data
-http://svy.mk/Hygmcx

Tools for “Home Grown” UseTools for “Home Grown” Use
• Databases
– Microsoft Products – Excel & Access
– Apple – Numbers
• Surveys & Evaluation Forms
– Survey Monkey
– Google Forms
• Statistical tests
– http://quantpsy.org/calc.htm
– http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/index.cfm

Where Do We Go From Here?Where Do We Go From Here?
• Continue the WOW experience in the
online workshop:
– http://nclcawows.pbworks.com

Let NCLCA add some
W.O.W.W.O.W.
to your work day…
The purpose of the WOW series is to support learning center professionals as they develop
and maintain learning centers, programs, and services to enhance student learning.
The series gives learning assistance professionals a chance to participate both
synchronously (synchronously (webinarwebinar) and asynchronously () and asynchronously (online workshoponline workshop))
in a relatively inexpensive and high quality professional development experience.
Introducing a new interactive professional development experience that allows you to interact
from the comfort of your own office or home computer…
SESSION
#2
Coming Soon in June/July
Curriculum Design & Program Development
Call for proposals coming out May1stCall for proposals coming out May1st .
WEBINAR & ONLINE WORKSHOP SERIES (WOWS)WEBINAR & ONLINE WORKSHOP SERIES (WOWS)

Measuring Student Success: Tutoring and Learning Centers

More Related Content

What's hot

Viewers also liked

Similar to Measuring Student Success: Tutoring and Learning Centers

More from Lisa D'Adamo-Weinstein

Recently uploaded

Measuring Student Success: Tutoring and Learning Centers

Editor's Notes