The National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) aims to promote student access and success through rigorous research on distance education. Over three years, DETA will develop research models and frameworks, host a national summit, establish research questions, create research toolkits, fund pilot studies through a request for proposals, and evaluate models and technologies. The goal is to understand how different instructional designs and support structures impact student outcomes like learning, satisfaction, and completion for diverse populations. Findings will ensure quality education and inform sustainable teaching practices in online, blended, and competency-based models. DETA is led by co-directors Drs. Tanya Joosten and Diane Reddy.
A Workshop: Promoting Student Access and Success Through ResearchTanya Joosten
Promoting Student Access and Success Through Research
July 7, 2015 - 8:30am
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA)
Track: Blended Models & Course Design
Interactive Workshop - 210 minutes
Location: Governor's Square 14
Virtual Session
Session Duration: 210 Minutes
Workshop Session 1 & 2 (combined)
Abstract:
Participate in the development of a research model to support the National DETA Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Education.
Extended Abstract
Come help us develop a research model to facilitate cross institutional research on blended instruction. The future of blended learning should be driven by research-based instructional and institutional interventions as the result of cross institutional research impacting access, learning effectiveness, and student satisfaction.
To give you a little background, the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee will share their efforts in the establishment of the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education. They seek to foster student access and success through evidence-based, cross-institutional online learning practices and technologies. Specifically, DETA looks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in blended and online learning, including competency-based education, for underrepresented populations through rigorous research.
This workshop looks to engage the blended learning community in assisting of the development of DETA's research agenda, including a research model for distance education and research toolkits that can be used by institutions across the country. Through collaborative group discussions, this workshop will look for participants to brainstorm and prioritize ideas around defining student success, identifying key research questions to drive future research, development of shared measures to be gathered by different institutions, creation of instrumentation, and more. The outcomes of this workshop will inform research conducted in 2016. Further, opportunities for community engagement, including funding to conduct cross-institutional research, will be discussed.
For more information on our efforts thus, see http://uwm.edu/deta/summit.
Come be a part of this exciting initiative!
Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA)Tanya Joosten
The National Distance Education And Technological Advancement (DETA) Research Center Information Session
April 24, 2015 - 9:25am
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA)
Track: Effective Teaching and Learning Pedagogy
Information Session
Location: Stateroom 1
Session: Concurrent Session 8
Session Duration: 50 Minutes
Abstract:
The presentation will share National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) funded by the U.S. Department of Education research agenda, proposed research model for distance education, and opportunities for community engagement, including funding to conduct cross-institutional research.
Conducting Research on Blended and Online Education: A Research ToolkitTanya Joosten
An ELI Short Course delivered on May 16th, 2016.
This session consists of practice-based research planning activities to help participants prepare for conducting research at the course or program level. Specifically, we will utilize the distance education research toolkit developed by the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) to guide the development of research plans for blended and online learning. Attendees will walk away with a research agenda and the necessary tools to help them conduct research on their campus as part of the National DETA Research Center initiative. The DETA Center seeks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in online learning (including competency-based education) for underrepresented learners.
Objectives:
After participating in this webinar, participants will be able to:
Develop research questions
Clarify variables and measures
Identify data gathering techniques
Consider other actionable milestones necessary to conduct rigorous research
http://www.educause.edu/events/eli-webinar-conducting-research-blended-and-online-education
Promoting student access and success through researchTanya Joosten
Conference Keynote
"Promoting Student Access and Success Through Research"
The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee will share its agenda in the establishment of the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA). It seeks to foster student access and success through evidence-based, cross-institutional online learning practices and technologies.
https://www.qualitymatters.org/events/mid-atlantic-conference
Conducting Research on Blended and Online Education, WorkshopTanya Joosten
Conducting Research on Blended and Online Education
October 14, 2015 - 8:30am
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA)
Nori Barajas-Murphy (University of La Verne, USA)
Track: Learning Effectiveness
Pre-Conference Workshop
Location: Oceanic 7
Session Duration: 3 Hours
Pre-Conference Workshop Session 3
This workshop consists of practice-based research planning activities to help you prepare for conducting research at the course or program level. Specifically, we will utilize the distance education research model developed by the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) to guide the development of research plans for blended and online. Attendees will walk away with a research agenda and the necessary tools to help them conduct research on their campus as part of the National DETA Research Center initiative.
The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) established a National Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) Research Center in 2014 to conduct cross-institutional data collection with 2-year and 4-year Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) funded by the U.S. Department of Education Fund for Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE). UWM has partnered with the University of Wisconsin System, UW-Extension, Milwaukee Area Technical College (MATC), EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI), and leaders across the nation to develop a research model. This model is to promote student access and success through evidence-based online learning practices and learning technologies.
The DETA Center looks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in online learning (including competency-based education) for underrepresented individuals (i.e., economically disadvantaged, adult learners, disabled) through rigorous research. Furthermore, although the research currently is focused on postsecondary U.S. institutions, the DETA Center looks to advance their work in K-12 and internationally -- all are welcome!
This workshop will prepare attendees to take a plan back to their own institution to successfully gather research on blended and online teaching and learning.
For more on DETA, visit http://www.uwm.edu/deta.
Conducting Research in Blended and Online EducationTanya Joosten
A workshop at #WCET15 in Denver, CO
This hands-on workshop consists of practice-based research planning activities to help you prepare for conducting research at the course or program level. Specifically, we will utilize the distance education research model developed by the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) to guide the development of research plans for blended and online. Attendees will walk away with a research agenda and the necessary tools to help them conduct research on their campus as part of the National DETA Research Center initiative. The DETA Center looks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in online learning (including competency-based education) for underrepresented individuals (i.e., economically disadvantaged, adult learners, disabled) through rigorous research. This workshop will prepare attendees to take a plan back to their own institution to successfully gather research on blended and online teaching and learning. For more on DETA, visit http://www.uwm.edu/deta. The workshop will span two concurrent session blocks- part I, 1:30 - 2:30 p.m. and part II, 3:00 - 4:00 p.m. Bring your laptop or mobile device.
http://wcetconference.wiche.edu/sessions/conducting-research-blended-and-online
A Workshop: Promoting Student Access and Success Through ResearchTanya Joosten
Promoting Student Access and Success Through Research
July 7, 2015 - 8:30am
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA)
Track: Blended Models & Course Design
Interactive Workshop - 210 minutes
Location: Governor's Square 14
Virtual Session
Session Duration: 210 Minutes
Workshop Session 1 & 2 (combined)
Abstract:
Participate in the development of a research model to support the National DETA Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Education.
Extended Abstract
Come help us develop a research model to facilitate cross institutional research on blended instruction. The future of blended learning should be driven by research-based instructional and institutional interventions as the result of cross institutional research impacting access, learning effectiveness, and student satisfaction.
To give you a little background, the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee will share their efforts in the establishment of the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education. They seek to foster student access and success through evidence-based, cross-institutional online learning practices and technologies. Specifically, DETA looks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in blended and online learning, including competency-based education, for underrepresented populations through rigorous research.
This workshop looks to engage the blended learning community in assisting of the development of DETA's research agenda, including a research model for distance education and research toolkits that can be used by institutions across the country. Through collaborative group discussions, this workshop will look for participants to brainstorm and prioritize ideas around defining student success, identifying key research questions to drive future research, development of shared measures to be gathered by different institutions, creation of instrumentation, and more. The outcomes of this workshop will inform research conducted in 2016. Further, opportunities for community engagement, including funding to conduct cross-institutional research, will be discussed.
For more information on our efforts thus, see http://uwm.edu/deta/summit.
Come be a part of this exciting initiative!
Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA)Tanya Joosten
The National Distance Education And Technological Advancement (DETA) Research Center Information Session
April 24, 2015 - 9:25am
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA)
Track: Effective Teaching and Learning Pedagogy
Information Session
Location: Stateroom 1
Session: Concurrent Session 8
Session Duration: 50 Minutes
Abstract:
The presentation will share National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) funded by the U.S. Department of Education research agenda, proposed research model for distance education, and opportunities for community engagement, including funding to conduct cross-institutional research.
Conducting Research on Blended and Online Education: A Research ToolkitTanya Joosten
An ELI Short Course delivered on May 16th, 2016.
This session consists of practice-based research planning activities to help participants prepare for conducting research at the course or program level. Specifically, we will utilize the distance education research toolkit developed by the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) to guide the development of research plans for blended and online learning. Attendees will walk away with a research agenda and the necessary tools to help them conduct research on their campus as part of the National DETA Research Center initiative. The DETA Center seeks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in online learning (including competency-based education) for underrepresented learners.
Objectives:
After participating in this webinar, participants will be able to:
Develop research questions
Clarify variables and measures
Identify data gathering techniques
Consider other actionable milestones necessary to conduct rigorous research
http://www.educause.edu/events/eli-webinar-conducting-research-blended-and-online-education
Promoting student access and success through researchTanya Joosten
Conference Keynote
"Promoting Student Access and Success Through Research"
The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee will share its agenda in the establishment of the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA). It seeks to foster student access and success through evidence-based, cross-institutional online learning practices and technologies.
https://www.qualitymatters.org/events/mid-atlantic-conference
Conducting Research on Blended and Online Education, WorkshopTanya Joosten
Conducting Research on Blended and Online Education
October 14, 2015 - 8:30am
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA)
Nori Barajas-Murphy (University of La Verne, USA)
Track: Learning Effectiveness
Pre-Conference Workshop
Location: Oceanic 7
Session Duration: 3 Hours
Pre-Conference Workshop Session 3
This workshop consists of practice-based research planning activities to help you prepare for conducting research at the course or program level. Specifically, we will utilize the distance education research model developed by the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) to guide the development of research plans for blended and online. Attendees will walk away with a research agenda and the necessary tools to help them conduct research on their campus as part of the National DETA Research Center initiative.
The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) established a National Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) Research Center in 2014 to conduct cross-institutional data collection with 2-year and 4-year Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) funded by the U.S. Department of Education Fund for Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE). UWM has partnered with the University of Wisconsin System, UW-Extension, Milwaukee Area Technical College (MATC), EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI), and leaders across the nation to develop a research model. This model is to promote student access and success through evidence-based online learning practices and learning technologies.
The DETA Center looks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in online learning (including competency-based education) for underrepresented individuals (i.e., economically disadvantaged, adult learners, disabled) through rigorous research. Furthermore, although the research currently is focused on postsecondary U.S. institutions, the DETA Center looks to advance their work in K-12 and internationally -- all are welcome!
This workshop will prepare attendees to take a plan back to their own institution to successfully gather research on blended and online teaching and learning.
For more on DETA, visit http://www.uwm.edu/deta.
Conducting Research in Blended and Online EducationTanya Joosten
A workshop at #WCET15 in Denver, CO
This hands-on workshop consists of practice-based research planning activities to help you prepare for conducting research at the course or program level. Specifically, we will utilize the distance education research model developed by the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) to guide the development of research plans for blended and online. Attendees will walk away with a research agenda and the necessary tools to help them conduct research on their campus as part of the National DETA Research Center initiative. The DETA Center looks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in online learning (including competency-based education) for underrepresented individuals (i.e., economically disadvantaged, adult learners, disabled) through rigorous research. This workshop will prepare attendees to take a plan back to their own institution to successfully gather research on blended and online teaching and learning. For more on DETA, visit http://www.uwm.edu/deta. The workshop will span two concurrent session blocks- part I, 1:30 - 2:30 p.m. and part II, 3:00 - 4:00 p.m. Bring your laptop or mobile device.
http://wcetconference.wiche.edu/sessions/conducting-research-blended-and-online
Effectiveness of Blended and Online ProgramsTanya Joosten
My portion of the preso from:
Join Malcolm Brown, EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative director, and Veronica Diaz, ELI associate director, as they moderate this special two-hour webinar hosted by the EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative and Quality Matters. This webinar will provide you with examples and tools to craft plans that measure the effectiveness of your online/blended instructional programs and their impact on student learning and success. You will explore rubrics, hear about institutional efforts, and engage in activities that relate to quality assurance work. The purpose of the event is to understand some approaches to measure the effectiveness of online/blended learning programs:
Learn about national research efforts on quality assurance in online/blended environments
Gather ideas on demonstrating the efficacy of your online/blended learning implementations
Consider approaches for measuring the impact of online/blended programs within a specific institutional context
http://www.educause.edu/events/eli-webinar-measuring-effectiveness-onlineblended-programs
Promoting Effective Teaching and Learning Ecosystems via Research Proven Prac...Tanya Joosten
ELI Leadership Seminar, 2016, San Antonio TX
The ELI Leadership Seminar, "Promoting a Sustainable and Effective Teaching and Learning Ecosystem via Research Proven Practice," is an extended learning opportunity threaded throughout the annual meeting program. The goals for this seminar are to:
Enable quality teaching and learning through evidence-based faculty development to diffuse proven instructional interventions and practices
Discover ways to gather evidence using a research model for online learning, including key research questions driving inquiry
Explore different research designs (experimental and survey with data mining) for studying teaching and learning innovations
Develop a research plan for your program or institution that will assist in identifying effective instructional and institutional practices in blended and online learning
Identify potential methods of effectively engaging faculty in teaching and researching innovations in student learning
Learn about institutional mechanisms that can impact quality in teaching and learning, particularly in blended and online environments
Enable participants to network with peers interested in promoting effective teaching and learning through research on blended and online programming at universities
Participants, both new and experienced, will benefit from peer interaction and the opportunity to network and engage with leaders during small group discussions. Participants will meet with, share with, and learn from a cohort of peers from a wide range of positions supporting teaching and learning from different types of higher education institutions.
OLC Innovate: Why Isn’t There More Cross-Institutional Research?Tanya Joosten
Why Isn’t There More Cross-Institutional Research?
Date: Thursday, April 19th
Time: 8:45 AM to 9:30 AM
Conference Session: Concurrent Session 4
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee)
Co-presenters: Rachel Cusatis (National Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements), Lindsey Harness (Distance Education and Technological Advancements)
Track: Research: Designs, Methods, and Findings
Location: Belmont A
Session Duration: 45min
Brief Abstract:
After conducting seven cross-institutional research studies in online learning and competency-based education, we will share what we have learned in the process and discuss ways to advance cross-institutional research.
This presentation was given at the OpenCourseWare Consortium Global Meeting in May, 2011. It describes some of the results from an evaluation project initiated by Open.Michigan in September 2010. Full results can be found at tinyurl.com/omevaluation.
Introduction to the joint JISC CETIS and Making Assessment Count project event on 2 February 2011. Background information and further reading on the topic of assessment feedback.
Using A Research Lens To Examine Your COVID-19 Pandemic ResponseTanya Joosten
FEATURED SESSION
Using A Research Lens To Examine Your COVID-19 Pandemic Response
Date: Tuesday, November 17th
Time: 11:45 AM to 12:30 PM
Conference Session: Concurrent Session 4
Session Modality: Virtual
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee)
Track: Research, Evaluation, and Learning Analytics
Location: Zoom Room 1
Session Duration: 45min
Brief Abstract:
Using a recently developed research toolkit to drive our discussion, this session will help you identify meaningful research questions, variables, measures, instrumentation and other data collection tools, and data collection techniques to more effectively understand your and your institution’s response to providing instruction and support remotely during COVID-19 pandemic.
Presentation given by Rebecca Ferguson at the ORT University Institute of Education, Montevideo, Uruguay on 12 April 2016. It deals with the Innovating Pedagogy reports produced annually since 2012 by the Institute of Educational Technology (IET) at The Open University (OU).
Give them what they want: Participatory approaches to developing anonymous as...Simon Davis
Presented at ALT-C 2015; https://altc.alt.ac.uk/2015/sessions/give-them-what-they-want-developing-a-flexible-anonymous-assignment-workflow-to-meet-diverse-needs-895/
Workshop run at the European Conference for e-Learning 2015 (ECEL 2015) at the University of Hertfordshire, UK. The workshop included an introduction of both learning analytics and learning design, as well as an exploration of how these could be employed in MOOCs. Some of the group work was focused on the Agincourt MOOC run by the University of Southampton on the FutureLearn platform.
This mixed methods study explored racial or ethnic minority students who were enrolled in an online course to determine if there was a relationship between their online learning readiness characteristics and their outcomes across institutions. Also, minority student perceptions of what skills and experiences lead to success and how they can be better supported for online online learning is reported. Student surveys were administered using Likert and open-ended items to gather quantitative and qualitative data. Readiness characteristics included student reporting of their technology access, beliefs, and skills (technology access, online work skills, social technology skills, online efficacy), their self-efficacy (self-directedness and organization, achievement mindset, and growth mindset), and their communication (need for socialization, general communication competence, communication with instructor, and communication with peers), and student outcomes gathered included student perceptions of learning, self-reported satisfaction, and academic performance (course grade, instructor reported). Significant findings were discovered from multiple regression analyses indicating that several of these measures of readiness (online work skills, online efficacy, self-directedness and organization, communication with instructor, communication with classmates) positively influence student outcomes (learning, satisfaction, and academic performance). Qualitative findings indicate that minority students report time management, previous online course experience, and online work skills as the most prevalent themes of skills and experiences that positively influence their success. Moreover, they recommend that instructors and institutions provide them additional resources prior to the class to better prepare them to be successful, and that they receive support during the class by instructors and academic support staff. Recommendations are shared.
SOLAR - learning analytics, the state of the artRebecca Ferguson
On 3 May 2012, the Society for Learning Analytics Research (SoLAR) organised a learning analytics summit. The summit took place in Vancouver, Canada, following the second Learning Ananlytics and Knowledge conference (LAK12). This presentation summarised the state of the art in learning analytics at the time, identifying drivers, challenges, interest groups and future challenges.
“Promoting student access and success through research”Tanya Joosten
Presented at the University of Nebraska WorldWide Innovation in Pedagogy and Technology Conference
Tanya Joosten will share the research agenda in the establishment of the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education. DETA seeks to foster student access and success through evidence-based, cross-institutional online learning practices and technologies. Specifically, DETA looks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in online learning, including competency-based education, for underrepresented populations through rigorous research. The presentation will share DETA's purpose and research agenda, proposed research model for distance education, and opportunities for community engagement, including funding to conduct cross-institutional research.
Effectiveness of Blended and Online ProgramsTanya Joosten
My portion of the preso from:
Join Malcolm Brown, EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative director, and Veronica Diaz, ELI associate director, as they moderate this special two-hour webinar hosted by the EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative and Quality Matters. This webinar will provide you with examples and tools to craft plans that measure the effectiveness of your online/blended instructional programs and their impact on student learning and success. You will explore rubrics, hear about institutional efforts, and engage in activities that relate to quality assurance work. The purpose of the event is to understand some approaches to measure the effectiveness of online/blended learning programs:
Learn about national research efforts on quality assurance in online/blended environments
Gather ideas on demonstrating the efficacy of your online/blended learning implementations
Consider approaches for measuring the impact of online/blended programs within a specific institutional context
http://www.educause.edu/events/eli-webinar-measuring-effectiveness-onlineblended-programs
Promoting Effective Teaching and Learning Ecosystems via Research Proven Prac...Tanya Joosten
ELI Leadership Seminar, 2016, San Antonio TX
The ELI Leadership Seminar, "Promoting a Sustainable and Effective Teaching and Learning Ecosystem via Research Proven Practice," is an extended learning opportunity threaded throughout the annual meeting program. The goals for this seminar are to:
Enable quality teaching and learning through evidence-based faculty development to diffuse proven instructional interventions and practices
Discover ways to gather evidence using a research model for online learning, including key research questions driving inquiry
Explore different research designs (experimental and survey with data mining) for studying teaching and learning innovations
Develop a research plan for your program or institution that will assist in identifying effective instructional and institutional practices in blended and online learning
Identify potential methods of effectively engaging faculty in teaching and researching innovations in student learning
Learn about institutional mechanisms that can impact quality in teaching and learning, particularly in blended and online environments
Enable participants to network with peers interested in promoting effective teaching and learning through research on blended and online programming at universities
Participants, both new and experienced, will benefit from peer interaction and the opportunity to network and engage with leaders during small group discussions. Participants will meet with, share with, and learn from a cohort of peers from a wide range of positions supporting teaching and learning from different types of higher education institutions.
OLC Innovate: Why Isn’t There More Cross-Institutional Research?Tanya Joosten
Why Isn’t There More Cross-Institutional Research?
Date: Thursday, April 19th
Time: 8:45 AM to 9:30 AM
Conference Session: Concurrent Session 4
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee)
Co-presenters: Rachel Cusatis (National Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements), Lindsey Harness (Distance Education and Technological Advancements)
Track: Research: Designs, Methods, and Findings
Location: Belmont A
Session Duration: 45min
Brief Abstract:
After conducting seven cross-institutional research studies in online learning and competency-based education, we will share what we have learned in the process and discuss ways to advance cross-institutional research.
This presentation was given at the OpenCourseWare Consortium Global Meeting in May, 2011. It describes some of the results from an evaluation project initiated by Open.Michigan in September 2010. Full results can be found at tinyurl.com/omevaluation.
Introduction to the joint JISC CETIS and Making Assessment Count project event on 2 February 2011. Background information and further reading on the topic of assessment feedback.
Using A Research Lens To Examine Your COVID-19 Pandemic ResponseTanya Joosten
FEATURED SESSION
Using A Research Lens To Examine Your COVID-19 Pandemic Response
Date: Tuesday, November 17th
Time: 11:45 AM to 12:30 PM
Conference Session: Concurrent Session 4
Session Modality: Virtual
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee)
Track: Research, Evaluation, and Learning Analytics
Location: Zoom Room 1
Session Duration: 45min
Brief Abstract:
Using a recently developed research toolkit to drive our discussion, this session will help you identify meaningful research questions, variables, measures, instrumentation and other data collection tools, and data collection techniques to more effectively understand your and your institution’s response to providing instruction and support remotely during COVID-19 pandemic.
Presentation given by Rebecca Ferguson at the ORT University Institute of Education, Montevideo, Uruguay on 12 April 2016. It deals with the Innovating Pedagogy reports produced annually since 2012 by the Institute of Educational Technology (IET) at The Open University (OU).
Give them what they want: Participatory approaches to developing anonymous as...Simon Davis
Presented at ALT-C 2015; https://altc.alt.ac.uk/2015/sessions/give-them-what-they-want-developing-a-flexible-anonymous-assignment-workflow-to-meet-diverse-needs-895/
Workshop run at the European Conference for e-Learning 2015 (ECEL 2015) at the University of Hertfordshire, UK. The workshop included an introduction of both learning analytics and learning design, as well as an exploration of how these could be employed in MOOCs. Some of the group work was focused on the Agincourt MOOC run by the University of Southampton on the FutureLearn platform.
This mixed methods study explored racial or ethnic minority students who were enrolled in an online course to determine if there was a relationship between their online learning readiness characteristics and their outcomes across institutions. Also, minority student perceptions of what skills and experiences lead to success and how they can be better supported for online online learning is reported. Student surveys were administered using Likert and open-ended items to gather quantitative and qualitative data. Readiness characteristics included student reporting of their technology access, beliefs, and skills (technology access, online work skills, social technology skills, online efficacy), their self-efficacy (self-directedness and organization, achievement mindset, and growth mindset), and their communication (need for socialization, general communication competence, communication with instructor, and communication with peers), and student outcomes gathered included student perceptions of learning, self-reported satisfaction, and academic performance (course grade, instructor reported). Significant findings were discovered from multiple regression analyses indicating that several of these measures of readiness (online work skills, online efficacy, self-directedness and organization, communication with instructor, communication with classmates) positively influence student outcomes (learning, satisfaction, and academic performance). Qualitative findings indicate that minority students report time management, previous online course experience, and online work skills as the most prevalent themes of skills and experiences that positively influence their success. Moreover, they recommend that instructors and institutions provide them additional resources prior to the class to better prepare them to be successful, and that they receive support during the class by instructors and academic support staff. Recommendations are shared.
SOLAR - learning analytics, the state of the artRebecca Ferguson
On 3 May 2012, the Society for Learning Analytics Research (SoLAR) organised a learning analytics summit. The summit took place in Vancouver, Canada, following the second Learning Ananlytics and Knowledge conference (LAK12). This presentation summarised the state of the art in learning analytics at the time, identifying drivers, challenges, interest groups and future challenges.
“Promoting student access and success through research”Tanya Joosten
Presented at the University of Nebraska WorldWide Innovation in Pedagogy and Technology Conference
Tanya Joosten will share the research agenda in the establishment of the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education. DETA seeks to foster student access and success through evidence-based, cross-institutional online learning practices and technologies. Specifically, DETA looks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in online learning, including competency-based education, for underrepresented populations through rigorous research. The presentation will share DETA's purpose and research agenda, proposed research model for distance education, and opportunities for community engagement, including funding to conduct cross-institutional research.
Curriculum and Instructional Design for Online and Distance Learning Environm...Nicola Marae Allain, PhD
A presentation on the curriculum development process at SUNY Empire State College, a leader in adult centered distance and online learning.The presentation focuses on how these processes achieve the following goals: Promote deep learning through visual and multimedia approaches; Enhance collaborative learning – teams, group presentations, debates, students as facilitators; Integrate Case studies across the disciplines; Integrate library research and library based activities into every course; Integrate optimal technology tools for multiple pedagogical uses; Integrate work-based learning and connection with social problems; Build community beyond courses.
Web Presentation for the University of Oulu, Finland, April 24, 2007
Melbourne Polytechnic presentation Neil MorrisNeil Morris
Using blended learning to enhance learning, engagement and outcomes
Professor Neil Morris
T: @NeilMorrisDT
Presentation at Melbourne Polytechnic, Melbourne, June 2022
Designing Exemplary Online Courses in BlackboardJason Rhode
During this presentation by Jason Rhode at the 12th annual SLATE Conference on 10/23/14, we explored suggested best practices included in the Blackboard Exemplary Course Program Rubric for designing engaging online courses. Jason shared practical tips from his experience building a course in Blackboard that meets the established ECP quality benchmarks. We also covered the steps and associated deadlines for faculty interested in submitting their course for consideration as a Blackboard Exemplary Course. This session was geared toward an audience already familiar with the basic online teaching tools available in Blackboard Learn. While the examples shared were specifically of courses in Blackboard, the principles can be applied to developing quality online courses in any learning management system. Links to resources shared are available at http://www.jasonrhode.com/exemplarycourse
Latest Trends in Standards and Benchmarking for Technology Enhanced Learning:...Charles Darwin University
As TEQSA ramps-up its interest in how higher education institutions are mediating a level of quality in online courses, it is timely for our institutions to understand what options they have at their disposal to help meet, what will eventually become, obligatory reporting. This will predictably involve being able to provide evidence of quality processes across three levels; the unit/course level, the course/program level and at an institutional level. To help an institution establish, or initiate practices to assist them in meeting these requirements, there are a number of existing and emerging tools that are now being used and trialled within the sector. There are also a number of professional bodies who are really keen to get involved in this space, mainly as a way of supporting their members and member institutions.
This presentation will present a systematic review of the literature and a sector scan of the current tools and methodologies being used by a range of institutions and professional bodies. It will also provide some insights into what tools are emerging in this space. To support, or augment these tools and methodologies, there are also a range of support, or scaffolding activities institutions can, or have been be involved in, as they seek to support their internal quality improvement practices.
Examples of current practices will be drawn on to illustrate the main points in this presentation along with a brief report on the most recent ACODE Inter-institutional Benchmarking Summit, held in June 2018 at Griffith University. At this event 25 Australasian Institutions undertook a rigorous benchmarking activity using some or all of the eight benchmarks focusing on technology enhanced learning and teaching.
In conclusion this presentation will challenge institutions to take seriously their mandate to provide their students with learning environments that meet the highest possible quality, particularly now in a higher education setting that will come under increased scrutiny by regulatory bodies. More importantly, it will reflect on what the potential implications are for institutions in moderating their learning management and associated systems.
Flipping Not Flopping: Infusing Active Learning in Online and Blended CoursesJason Rhode
In this keynote session by Jason Rhode at the St. Mary's University of Minnesota Fall Faculty Conference on 9/19/14, we considered how the flipped delivery model aligns to online and blended course designs. Jason Rhode shared tips and best practices for designing engaging and interactive online and blended courses that incorporate a flipped methodology. Additionally, we explored practical steps for embracing e-communications in developing a virtual learning community that facilitates active learning. More info about the session and links to provided resources are available at http://jasonrhode.com/smumn14
Designing Exemplary Online Courses in BlackboardJason Rhode
The Blackboard Exemplary Course Program began in 2000 with the goal of identifying and disseminating best practices for designing engaging online courses. Using an established rubric for online course quality, faculty and course designers can evaluate how well their course conforms to proven online teaching best practices for Course Design, Interaction and Collaboration, Assessment, and Learner Support. During this online session offered 12/17/13, we explored suggested best practices included in the Blackboard Exemplary Course Program Rubric for designing engaging online courses. Practical tips for building a course in Blackboard that meets the established quality benchmarks and links to sample award-winning course tours were provided. We also covered the steps and associated deadlines for faculty interested in submitting their course for consideration as a Blackboard Exemplary Course. This workshop was geared toward an audience already familiar with the basic online teaching tools available in Blackboard.
Florida Virtual School, the nation’s largest state K-12 virtual school, engages in multiple instructional research partnerships each year. In this presentation, members of the FLVS leadership team will discuss the process of designing organizational research goals and partnering with external researchers, in addition to sharing the challenges and best practices in managing research partnerships—from research methods/design to data collection and security. Additionally, a summary of ongoing instructional research projects at FLVS will be offered. This presentation will appeal to both providers and researchers as an opportunity to learn more about working together in the important process of research partnership.
LaTrobe University - Neil Morris presentationNeil Morris
Harnessing digital technology and online learning to enhance inclusive teaching practices
Professor Neil Morris
T: @NeilMorrisDT
Presentation at LaTrobe University, Melbourne, June 2022
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
Promoting Student Access and Success Through Research
1. Promoting Student Access and
Success Through Research
Drs. Tanya Joosten and Diane Reddy
Co-Directors and Co-PIs
National Research Center for
Distance Education and Technological Advancement
@UWMDETA
@tjoosten
slideshare.net/tjoosten
uwm.edu/DETA
National Research Center for
Distance Education and
Technological Advancements
(DETA)
2. How do we ensure all
students have access to a
quality higher education?
16. Research questions
Defined
What are the different design components (content, interactivity,
assessments) that impact student learning?
What patterns of behaviors lead to increased student learning for different
populations?
What support structures are critical to providing quality access to online
instruction?
Exploratory (Interpretive)
What are the definitions of success from students’ perspective?
How can we define and measure student success beyond traditional
outcomes?
What is the currency of student learning beyond the existing credit hours?
What are the key components that promote a sustainable and an effective
teaching and learning ecosystem?
19. Year 2 activity: Research toolkits
Shared measures –
Student performance is
based on numerical
representation of grade
converted to a 4.0 scale
received in the course on
assessments and as an
overall grade.
RQs - What are the
different design
components (content,
interactivity, assessments)
that impact student
learning?
33. Session Evaluations Contest
• Open OLC Conferences Mobile App
• Navigate to session to evaluate
• Click on "Rate this Session“
• Complete Session Evaluation*
(As part of our "green" initiatives, OLC is no longer using paper forms for session evaluations.)
*Contact information required for contest entry but will not be shared with the presenters.
Winners will be contacted post-conference.
Each session evaluation completed (limited to one per session) = one contest entry
Five (5) $25 gift cards will be awarded to five (5) individuals
Must submit evals using the OLC Conferences mobile app
34. Dr. Tanya Joosten, @tjoosten,
tjoosten@uwm.edu
Dr. Diane Reddy, reddy@uwm.edu
DETA, Co-Directors and Co-PIs
http://www.uwm.edu/deta
http://www.slideshare.edu/tjoosten
Editor's Notes
It sounds almost contradictory right? How could we possible promote access and success in teaching and learning through success and research. This is argued any many institutions. Some have almost a divergent force when we talk about fulfilling our access mission, helping our students be successful – and pursuing research.
At UWM we have lived this reality for years. Many efforts are to ensure student access and success while other efforts are furthering research though externally funded projects.
However, I want to talk about how we can answer some key questions through collaborative research efforts that will help us promote student access and success in higher education, in particular distance education of which we see blended and online as prominent forms in this decade.
Student are allowed to push time
Courses from k-12 and post secondary/higher ed are based on a system of time and credit hours. Yet, as we live in a time that is much more hectic, with greater demands on our time due to changes in our society (two income households, more students, if not all, are working students, more undergraduates coming with families and jobs), we see that technology can help us become more efficient and overcome some of these barriers. Mediated learning opportunities, such as CBE, Online, and Blended, offer new pathways to degree providing students an access to an education that provides them more flexibility to manage their time and their lives.
However, these alternate forms of mediated learning have been questions through the decades, which has often raised the question of quality.
Traditionally, quality has been examined by comparing F2F to online, otherwise known as mode comparison studies
Research indicates that there was little difference in student satisfaction (Allen et al., 2002; Castle & McGuide, 2010; Lim, Morris, & Kupritz, 2006) and learning (Allen et al., 2004; Park & Gemino, 2001).
However, as Dziuban and Picciano (2015) discuss the “no significant difference phenomenon” refering to Roberts (2007) where they allude to the idea that research in online learning as “a kind of collective amnesia surrounds changes that happened over a more distant time frame. We tend to trust what we have seen for ourselves and thus dismiss events that occurred in the more distant past” (p. 13). Some researchers in disciplines newer to online learning tend to replicate the same studies with very little new to contribute to the understanding of the phenomenon.
Moore and Kearsley (2011) mention “…one of the major threats to good practice as well as to good scholarship in distance education is the common failure of the newcomers to the field to understand what a depth of knowledge there is” (p. xvi). More recently, some practitioners and researchers realized to better understand online learning they need to look more at process variables and build off of the previous decades of research.
Ensuring quality isn’t about comparing f2f and online…ensure quality is more. We know that F2F is not the gold standard either. There is good f2f and bad f2f, good and bad online…now, let’s ensure all education is good, quality education.
The online medium brings many new questions to an instructor. It is no longer about just how do I put my lectures and exams online. Well, those probably should have never been the questions.
The transformation becomes just as much, if not more, about the pedagogy and social processes in the classroom as it does about the technology.
Which brings us back to the question…how do we ensure quality. When we think about how we might communicate in our f2f and then consider how do we transform our course for the online environment, we have new questions. Or, we should.
What documentation and evidence can students’ provide for us to assess them?
Is this rigorous?
Does it provide opportunity for frequent or feedback?
What activities can we develop that utilize technology that will assist them in producing this assessment?
What technologies do we use for which activities?
What is the best way to delivery content?
What type of media due I use and when?
Text, Text and Images, Video
How do I organize this stuff online?
How do I best support my students to ensure they have a quality experience and do well in the course?
What is this peer instruction and team-based learning? Why is it so important in distance education?
UWM actually developed a document called the 10 questions for blended, then online, then MOOCs…
These questions and opportunities provided when we think about our instruction and learning in online courses are then in return impacting our f2f courses.
How do we design our instruction?
Considerations in content, assessment, interactivity (including supporting our students)
Organizing our courses online
Since it isn’t about time, it is about learning outcomes and their careful alignment to assessments and to learning activities.
to identify outcomes and influences on all students
We as a community need to conduct more research.
Add -- Blog post…why research is not as great as it could be…
to identify outcomes and influences on all students, including those with disabilities.
As part of our US Dept of Ed FIPSE grant we are looking to conduct research across institutions that helps bring greater clarity to these key factors in course and program design to help student have a quality experience.
Provide Justification for year 1 goal
Discuss each activity for year 1 goal
1. Host national summit
2. Determine desired outcomes
3. Establish framework of inquiry
4. Formulate measures
5. Establish research instrumentation
Transition: Now, let’s talk more specifically about our first activity as we are launching this grant.
What is success? What are our desired results?
Something we have learned in designing online courses is that we need to know what our desired results are before we can develop assessments and activities.
The same goes for research in distance education. We need to understand and determine distance education outcomes before we can develop research to ensure we are meeting those outcomes.
Desired Outcomes
Access
All learners who wish to learn online can access learning in a wide array of programs and courses,1 particularly underrepresented, those with disabilities and minorities.2 An essential component in distance education is a comprehensive infrastructure for learning that provides all individuals with the resources they need when and where they are needed. The underlying principle is that infrastructure includes people, instructional resources, processes, learning resources, policies, broadband, hardware, and software. It brings state-of-the art technology into learning to enable, motivate, and inspire all students, regardless of background, languages, or disabilities, to achieve.4
Data can be collected by examining administrative and technical infrastructure, which provides access to all prospective and enrolled learners. Access quality metrics are used for information dissemination, learning resource delivery, and tutoring services.1 Other possibilities include data gathered from student information systems, from student perception surveys, or objective accessibility ratings of online courses and programs.
Learning effectiveness
Learning effectiveness indicates a demonstration that learning outcomes were met or exceeded standards.1 This includes areas of study with research outcomes focusing on student success in achieving learning outcomes2 and other potential indicators of achievement (success, failure, achievement gains, academic achievement, improvement).3 Moreover, learning effectiveness could also include topics of retention (of content) and retention in a course (sometimes called attrition) or program (degree completion).
Typically data are gathered through direct assessment of student learning (e.g. overall grades, exam grades, or other assessments), faculty perception surveys, faculty interviews comparing learning effectiveness in delivery modes, and student focus groups or interviews measuring learning gains.1 Additionally, requests for new and better ways to measure what matters include concurrent data collection. Here, focusing on diagnosing strengths and weakness during the course of learning provides the opportunity for more immediate improved student performance. Furthermore, these technology-based assessments provide the opportunity to allow data to drive decisions on the basis of what is best for each and every student based on their unique attributes and interactivity in class.4 Other possibilities include data gathered from student information systems or from student perception surveys.
Satisfaction
Faculty are pleased with teaching online, citing appreciation and happiness. Students are pleased with their experiences in learning online, including interaction with instructors and peers, learning outcomes that match expectations, services, and orientation.1
Faculty and student surveys can indicate equal or growing satisfaction to traditional forms of learning. Other metrics can include repeat teaching of online courses by individual faculty and increase in percentage of faculty teaching online showing growing endorsement. Qualitative methods can include interviews, focus groups, testimonials with faculty, staff (including advisors and tutors), and/or students.1
Instructional effectiveness
Instructional effectiveness indicates the quality of education meets program, institutional, and national standards.1 The focus is on what and how we teach to match what people need to know, how they learn, where and when they will learn, and who needs to learn.4 The areas of study might include instructional improvement, program effectiveness, administrator effectiveness, curriculum evaluation, educational quality, outcomes of education programs, and instructional media.3 Additionally, instructional effectiveness is not limited to instruction provided inside the classroom, but extends itself to instructional support or supplemental instruction and guidance provided through institutional services or through staff and individuals outside of the classroom.
Traditionally, as in face-to-face delivered courses, student ratings of instructional effectiveness are collected. However, typically these standards in distance education and online learning are communicated in a course or program rubric (e.g., UC Chico, QM) which is administered through an objective rating of a course or program in addition to traditional methods. Recent work looks to gather this data through student perceptions of instructional effectiveness through course and program rubrics converted to student surveys. Other possibilities include objective ratings of online course and program design and instructional delivery.
References:
1. Online Learning Consortium, 5 Pillars
2. U.S. Department of Education, Application for Grants
3. What Works Clearinghouse
4. National Ed Tech Plan, U.S. Department of Education
Provide details on the summit at the ELI Annual Meeting
Where, when, why, who, how…
Provide Justification for year 1 goal
Discuss each activity for year 1 goal
1. Host national summit
2. Determine desired outcomes
3. Establish framework of inquiry
4. Formulate measures
5. Establish research instrumentation
Transition: Now, let’s talk more specifically about our first activity as we are launching this grant.
Provide Justification for year 1 goal
Discuss each activity for year 1 goal
1. Host national summit
2. Determine desired outcomes
3. Establish framework of inquiry
4. Formulate measures
5. Establish research instrumentation
Transition: Now, let’s talk more specifically about our first activity as we are launching this grant.
Provide Justification for year 1 goal
Discuss each activity for year 1 goal
1. Host national summit
2. Determine desired outcomes
3. Establish framework of inquiry
4. Formulate measures
5. Establish research instrumentation
Transition: Now, let’s talk more specifically about our first activity as we are launching this grant.
Provide Justification for year 1 goal
Discuss each activity for year 1 goal
1. Host national summit
2. Determine desired outcomes
3. Establish framework of inquiry
4. Formulate measures
5. Establish research instrumentation
Transition: Now, let’s talk more specifically about our first activity as we are launching this grant.
Final Year 1 Grant Activities:
4. Formulate measures
5. Establish research instrumentation
Which were included in the research toolkit.
The toolkits contain several research models or research designs to facilitate coherent cross institutional analysis including measures and instrumentation
Diane
The research toolkits produced from year 1 activities will be used by our research fellows, institutional partners, CBEN institutions
Furthermore, they will provide the guides and tools necessary too facilitate rigorous cross institutional research from experimental and survey designed studies gathering data from in-class assessment, survey packets, and student information system or data warehoused student data.
Note: Do not go into detail until slide 22
Now, let’s talk about the potential for you to get funding to collaborate with us….
Diane: Request for proposals for DETA subgrant awards is available in the research toolkit in Section 1. You will find background information, grant participation requirements, proposal requirements, and proposal review criteria.
The goal with the process is not to build hurdles in obtaining funding and support, but to ensure rigorous cross-institutional research and data collection and address audiences of interest
Goal 2 activities
2. Evaluate pilot grant proposal submissions
3. Engage research fellows in research projects
4. Ensure data collection addresses audiences of interest
Diane: Now, as mentioned, the toolkits are a year 2 activity that has already taken place, to assist us in our primary year 2 goal -- Collect data by replicating research models at the course, program, and institutional level
Let’s talk in a bit more detail how the contents of the toolkits are going to help make this happen…
Tanya: The first goal of the grant activities is to develop research models for online learning that provide guidance in the practice of distance education research. The models were intended to facilitate the exploration of instructional practices, inform future instructional practices, serve as a model for future research practices across educational institutions, and enhance consistency in the field. In the development process, it became clear that a more general research model was needed to represent the various research models and designs that would be deployed as part of the DETA research efforts rather than several specific research models.
More information is available in the toolkit or on our website.
Diane could discuss methodological considerations – how it can help them do research, etc.
She could mention WWC standards
Tanya can discuss gathering data through SIS and Surveys
Diane can mention how these will compliment experimental studies
Tanya can discuss how codebooks will help with data merging and how these are iterative…they will be improved once partners are identified and as data acquisition and merging
Collect data by replicating research models at the course, program, and institutional level
Discuss research toolkits produced from year 1 being used by our research fellows, institutional partners, CBEN institutions
Produce effective use cases for instructional improvement to enhance student learning through identification of success factors
Activities
1. Develop blueprints for best practices
2. Tag items for specific audiences
Dissemination
1. Effective practices use cases (accessible multimedia) through DETA Community Website and ELI SEI Website
Diane:
Goal 5: Identify and Disseminate Success Factors for Competency-Based Distance Education
1. Conduct Research on CBE
2. Develop Best Practices Blueprints for CBE
Dissemination
1. Best practices use cases (accessible multimedia) through DETA Community Website, ELI Webinar, and ELI SEI Website
Goal 6: Develop Guidelines and a Rubric for the Diffusion of Technological Advancements
1. Advance guidelines for technology diffusion
2. Develop technology evaluation rubric
Dissemination
1. Rubric through DETA Community Website
2. Guidelines for technology diffusion through DETA Community Website
3. Develop rubric for course and program evaluation
2. Rubric through DETA Community Website and ELI SEI Website