Роман Савченко: Комплексний підхід в оцінюванні стану проекту в ІТ компанії”

1. Project Status
Evaluation
Complex Approach

2. Origin
902071
ProjectsVisibility

3. Implications
Firefighting
Inefficient
resource
usage Client
dissatisfaction

4. Component #1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
TOTAL#OFIMPLEMENTEDFEATURES
#OFIMPLEMENTED/TESTEDFEATURESPERITERATION
ITERATIONS
QC coverage of developed features
Implemented by Dev Verified by QC US tested US implemented

5. Component #2

6. Solution
Project
L1 Assessment: Health check (metrics
analysis)
Goal: Identify projects which require
immediate assistance
L2 Assessment: Project Performance Review
Goal: Identify gaps and areas for
improvement
L3 Assessment: Deep analysis and crisis
management
Goal: Develop step-by-step action plan and
assist in it’s implementation
P
L1
L2
L3

7. L1 Assessment

8. L1 focus
Project metrics
monitoring by
Expert Group
Low
performers
list
High
performers
list
Projects for best
practices
application
Projects for best
practices elicitation

9. L2 Assessment

10. L2 focus
SDLC
Project
Management
Software
Development
Quality
Control
Business
Analysys

11. L3 Assessment

12. L3 focus
Exact practice
implementation
Tools
ArtefactsProcesses

13. Result
• Improved visibility to real project status
• Decreased reaction time
• Predictive analytics and corrective actions
• Best practices identification and distribution across the
company
• And other cool stuff…

14. Questions