Infertility David Toub, M.D.  Medical Director Newton Interactive
Definitions Infertility Inability to conceive after one year of unprotected intercourse (6 months for women over 35?) Fertility Ability to conceive Fecundity Ability to carry to delivery
Statistics 80% of couples will conceive within 1 year of unprotected intercourse ~86% will conceive within 2 years ~14-20% of US couples are infertile by definition (~3 million couples) Origin: Female factor ~40% Male factor ~30% Combined ~30%
Etiologies Sperm disorders 30.6% Anovulation/oligoovulation 30% Tubal disease 16% Unexplained 13.4% Cx factors 5.2% Peritoneal factors 4.8%
Associated Factors PID Endometriosis  Ovarian aging Spermatic varicocoele Toxins  Previous abdominal surgery (adhesions) Cervical/uterine abnormalities Cervical/uterine surgery Fibroids
Emotional and Educational Needs Disease of couples, not individuals Feelings of guilt Where to go for information? Options Feelings of frustration and anger Support groups (e.g. Resolve)
Overview of Evaluation Female  Ovary Tube  Corpus Cervix Peritoneum  Male Sperm count and function Ejaculate characteristics, immunology Anatomic anomalies
The Most Important Factor in the Evaluation of the Infertile Couple Is:
HISTORY
History-General Both couples should be present Age Previous pregnancies by each partner Length of time without pregnancy Sexual history  Frequency and timing of intercourse Use of lubricants Impotence, anorgasmia, dyspareunia Contraceptive history
History-Male History of pelvic infection Radiation, toxic exposures (include drugs) Mumps  Testicular surgery/injury  Excessive heat exposure (spermicidal)
History-Female Previous female pelvic surgery PID Appendicitis IUD use  Ectopic pregnancy history  DES (?relation to infertility) Endometriosis
History-Female Irregular menses, amenorrhea, detailed menstrual history  Vasomotor symptoms  Stress Weight changes Exercise Cervical and uterine surgery
When Not to Pursue an Infertility Evaluation Patient not sexually-active Patient not in long-term relationship? Patient declines treatment at this time Couple does not meet the definition of an infertile couple
Physical Exam-Male Size of testicles Testicular descent Varicocoele Outflow abnormalities (hypospadias, etc)
Physical Exam-Female Pelvic masses Uterosacral nodularity Abdominopelvic tenderness Uterine enlargement Thyroid exam Uterine mobility Cervical abnormalities
Overall Guidelines for Work-up  Timeliness of testing-w/u can usually be accomplished in 1-2 cycles Timing of tests Don’t over test Cut to the chase, i.e. proceed with laparoscopy if adhesive disease is likely
Work-up by Organ Unit
Ovary
Ovarian Function Document ovulation: BBT Luteal phase progesterone  LH surge EMBx  If POF suspected, perform FSH TSH, PRL, adrenal functions if indicated The only convincing proof of ovulation is  pregnancy
Ovarian Function Three main types of dysfunction Hypogonadotrophic, hypoestrogenic (central) Normogonadotrophic, normoestrogenic (e.g. PCOS) Hypergonadotrophic, hypoestrogenic (POF)
BBT Cheap and easy, but… Inconsistent results Provides evidence after the fact (like the old story about the barn door and the horse) May delay timely diagnosis and treatment 98% of women will ovulate within 3 days of the nadir Biphasic profiles can also be seen with LUF syndrome
Luteal Phase Progesterone Pulsatile release, thus single level may not be useful unless elevated Performed 7 days after presumptive ovulation Done properly, >15 ng/ml consistent with ovulation
Urinary LH Kits Very sensitive and accurate Positive test precedes ovulation by ~24 hours, so useful for timing intercourse Downside: price, obsession with timing of intercourse
Endometrial Biopsy  Invasive, but the only reliable way to diagnose LPD ??Is LPD a genuine disorder??? Pregnancy loss rate <1% Perform around 2 days before expected menstruation (= day 28 by definition) Lag of >2 days is consistent with LPD Must be done in two different cycles to confirm diagnosis of LPD
Fallopian Tubes
Tubal Function Evaluate tubal patency whenever there is a history of PID, endometriosis or other adhesiogenic condition Kartagener’s syndrome can be associated with decreased tubal motility Tests HSG Laparoscopy  Falloposcopy (not widely available)
Hysterosalpingography (HSG) Radiologic procedure requiring contrast Performed optimally in early proliferative phase (avoids pregnancy) Low risk of PID except if previous history of PID (give prophylactic doxycycline or consider laparoscopy) Oil-based contrast Higher risk of anaphylaxis than H 2 O-based May be associated with  fertility rates
Hysterosalpingography (HSG) Can be uncomfortable Pregnancy test is advisable Can detect intrauterine and tubal disorders but not always definitive
Laparoscopy  Invasive; requires OR or office setting Can offer diagnosis and treatment in one sitting Not necessary in all patients Uses (examples): Lysis of adhesions Diagnosis and excision of endometriosis Myomectomy  Tubal reconstructive surgery
Falloposcopy Hysteroscopic procedure with cannulation of the Fallopian tubes Can be useful for diagnosis of intraluminal pathology Promising technique but not yet widespread
Uterine Corpus
Corpus Asherman Syndrome Diagnosis by HSG or hysteroscopy Usually s/p D+C, myomectomy, other intrauterine surgery Associated with hypo/amenorrhea, recurrent miscarriage Fibroids, Uterine Anomalies Rarely associated with infertility Work-up: Ultrasound  Hysteroscopy Laparoscopy
Cervix
Cervical Function Infection Ureaplasma suspected Stenosis S/P LEEP, Cryosurgery, Cone biopsy (probably overstated) Immunologic Factors Sperm-mucus interaction
Cervical Function Tests: Culture for suspected pathogens  Postcoital test (PK tests) Scheduled around 1-2d before ovulation (increased estrogen effect) 48 0  of male abstinence before test No lubricants Evaluate 8-12h after coitus (overnight is ok!) Remove mucus from cervix (forceps, syringe)
Cervical Function PK, continued  (normal values in yellow) Quantity (very subjective) Quality (spinnbarkeit)  (>8 cm) Clarity  (clear) Ferning  (branched) Viscosity  (thin) WBC’s  (~0) # progressively motile sperm/hpf  (5-10/hpf) Gross sperm morphology  (WNL) Male factors
Problems with the PK test Subjective Timing varies; may need to be repeated In some studies, “infertile” couples with an abnormal PK conceived successfully during that same cycle
Peritoneum
Peritoneal Factors Endometriosis  2x relative risk of infertility Diagnosis (and best treatment) by laparoscopy  Can be familial; can occur in adolescents Etiology unknown but likely multiple ones Retrograde menstruation Immunologic factors Genetics Bad karma Medical options remain suboptimal
Male Factors
Male Factors Serum T, FSH, PRL levels Semen analysis Testicular biopsy  Sperm penetration assay (SPA)
Male Factors-Semen Analysis Collected after 48 0  of abstinence Evaluated within one hour of ejaculation If abnormal parameters, repeat twice, 2 weeks apart
Normal Semen Analysis
Sperm Penetration Assay aka “zona-free hamster ova assay” Dynamic test of fertilization capacity of sperm Failure to penetrate at least 10% of zona-free ova consistent with male factor False positives and negatives exist
Treatment Options
Ovarian Disorders Anovulation Clomiphene Citrate ± hCG hMG Induction + IUI (often done but unjustified) PRL Bromocriptine TSS if macroadenoma POF ?high-dose hMG (not very effective)
Ovarian Disorders Central amenorrhea CC first, then hMG Pulsatile GnRH LPD Progesterone suppositories during luteal phase CC ± hCG
Ovarian Matrix
Ovulation Induction CC 70% induction rate, ~40% pregnancy rate Patients should typically be normoestrogenic Induce menses and start on day 5 With  dosages, antiestrogen effects dominate Multifetal rates 5-10% Monitor effects with PK, pelvic exam
hMG (Pergonal) LH +FSH (also FSH alone = Metrodin) For patients with hypogonadotrophic hypoestrogenism or normal FSH and E 2  levels Close monitoring essential, including estradiol levels 60-80% pregnancy rates overall, lower for PCOS patients  10-15% multifetal pregnancy rate
Risks  CC Vasomotor symptoms  H/A Ovarian enlargement Multiple gestation NO risk of SAb or malformations hMG Multiple gestation OHSS (~1%) Can often be managed as outpatient Diuresis Severe cases fatal if untreated in ICU setting
Fallopian Tubes Tuboplasty IVF GIFT, ZIFT not options
Corpus Asherman syndrome Hysteroscopic lysis of adhesions  (scissor) Postop Abx, E 2 Fibroids (rarely need treatment) Myomectomy(hysteroscopic, laparoscopic, open) ??UAE Uterine anomalies (rarely need treatment) metroplasty
Cervix Repeat PK test to rule out inaccurate timing of test If cervicitis Abx If scant mucus low-dose estrogen Sperm motility issues (? Antisperm AB’s) Steroids? IUI
Peritoneum (Endometriosis) From a fertility standpoint, excision beats medical management Lysis of adhesions  GnRH-a (not a cure and has side effects,  expense) Danazol (side effects, cost) Continuous OCP’s (poor fertility rates) Chances of pregnancy highest within 6 mos-1 year after treatment
Male Factor Hypogonadotrophism hMG GnRH CC, hCG results poor Varicocoele Ligation? (no definitive data yet) Retrograde ejaculation Ephedrine, imipramine AIH with recovered sperm
Male Factor Idiopathic oligospermia No effective treatment  ?IVF donor insemination
Unexplained Infertility 5-10% of couples Consider PRL, laparoscopy, other hormonal tests, cultures, ASA testing, SPA if not done Review previous tests for validity Empiric treatment: Ovulation induction Abx IUI Consider IVF and its variants  Adoption
Summary Infertility is a common problem Infertility is a disease of  couples Evaluation must be thorough, but individualized Treatment is available, including IVF, but can be expensive, invasive, and of limited efficacy in some cases Consultation with a BC/BE reproductive endocrinologist is advisable
Thank you!

Laparoscopy 3

  • 1.
    Infertility David Toub,M.D. Medical Director Newton Interactive
  • 2.
    Definitions Infertility Inabilityto conceive after one year of unprotected intercourse (6 months for women over 35?) Fertility Ability to conceive Fecundity Ability to carry to delivery
  • 3.
    Statistics 80% ofcouples will conceive within 1 year of unprotected intercourse ~86% will conceive within 2 years ~14-20% of US couples are infertile by definition (~3 million couples) Origin: Female factor ~40% Male factor ~30% Combined ~30%
  • 4.
    Etiologies Sperm disorders30.6% Anovulation/oligoovulation 30% Tubal disease 16% Unexplained 13.4% Cx factors 5.2% Peritoneal factors 4.8%
  • 5.
    Associated Factors PIDEndometriosis Ovarian aging Spermatic varicocoele Toxins Previous abdominal surgery (adhesions) Cervical/uterine abnormalities Cervical/uterine surgery Fibroids
  • 6.
    Emotional and EducationalNeeds Disease of couples, not individuals Feelings of guilt Where to go for information? Options Feelings of frustration and anger Support groups (e.g. Resolve)
  • 7.
    Overview of EvaluationFemale Ovary Tube Corpus Cervix Peritoneum Male Sperm count and function Ejaculate characteristics, immunology Anatomic anomalies
  • 8.
    The Most ImportantFactor in the Evaluation of the Infertile Couple Is:
  • 9.
  • 10.
    History-General Both couplesshould be present Age Previous pregnancies by each partner Length of time without pregnancy Sexual history Frequency and timing of intercourse Use of lubricants Impotence, anorgasmia, dyspareunia Contraceptive history
  • 11.
    History-Male History ofpelvic infection Radiation, toxic exposures (include drugs) Mumps Testicular surgery/injury Excessive heat exposure (spermicidal)
  • 12.
    History-Female Previous femalepelvic surgery PID Appendicitis IUD use Ectopic pregnancy history DES (?relation to infertility) Endometriosis
  • 13.
    History-Female Irregular menses,amenorrhea, detailed menstrual history Vasomotor symptoms Stress Weight changes Exercise Cervical and uterine surgery
  • 14.
    When Not toPursue an Infertility Evaluation Patient not sexually-active Patient not in long-term relationship? Patient declines treatment at this time Couple does not meet the definition of an infertile couple
  • 15.
    Physical Exam-Male Sizeof testicles Testicular descent Varicocoele Outflow abnormalities (hypospadias, etc)
  • 16.
    Physical Exam-Female Pelvicmasses Uterosacral nodularity Abdominopelvic tenderness Uterine enlargement Thyroid exam Uterine mobility Cervical abnormalities
  • 17.
    Overall Guidelines forWork-up Timeliness of testing-w/u can usually be accomplished in 1-2 cycles Timing of tests Don’t over test Cut to the chase, i.e. proceed with laparoscopy if adhesive disease is likely
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Ovarian Function Documentovulation: BBT Luteal phase progesterone LH surge EMBx If POF suspected, perform FSH TSH, PRL, adrenal functions if indicated The only convincing proof of ovulation is pregnancy
  • 21.
    Ovarian Function Threemain types of dysfunction Hypogonadotrophic, hypoestrogenic (central) Normogonadotrophic, normoestrogenic (e.g. PCOS) Hypergonadotrophic, hypoestrogenic (POF)
  • 22.
    BBT Cheap andeasy, but… Inconsistent results Provides evidence after the fact (like the old story about the barn door and the horse) May delay timely diagnosis and treatment 98% of women will ovulate within 3 days of the nadir Biphasic profiles can also be seen with LUF syndrome
  • 23.
    Luteal Phase ProgesteronePulsatile release, thus single level may not be useful unless elevated Performed 7 days after presumptive ovulation Done properly, >15 ng/ml consistent with ovulation
  • 24.
    Urinary LH KitsVery sensitive and accurate Positive test precedes ovulation by ~24 hours, so useful for timing intercourse Downside: price, obsession with timing of intercourse
  • 25.
    Endometrial Biopsy Invasive, but the only reliable way to diagnose LPD ??Is LPD a genuine disorder??? Pregnancy loss rate <1% Perform around 2 days before expected menstruation (= day 28 by definition) Lag of >2 days is consistent with LPD Must be done in two different cycles to confirm diagnosis of LPD
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Tubal Function Evaluatetubal patency whenever there is a history of PID, endometriosis or other adhesiogenic condition Kartagener’s syndrome can be associated with decreased tubal motility Tests HSG Laparoscopy Falloposcopy (not widely available)
  • 28.
    Hysterosalpingography (HSG) Radiologicprocedure requiring contrast Performed optimally in early proliferative phase (avoids pregnancy) Low risk of PID except if previous history of PID (give prophylactic doxycycline or consider laparoscopy) Oil-based contrast Higher risk of anaphylaxis than H 2 O-based May be associated with fertility rates
  • 29.
    Hysterosalpingography (HSG) Canbe uncomfortable Pregnancy test is advisable Can detect intrauterine and tubal disorders but not always definitive
  • 30.
    Laparoscopy Invasive;requires OR or office setting Can offer diagnosis and treatment in one sitting Not necessary in all patients Uses (examples): Lysis of adhesions Diagnosis and excision of endometriosis Myomectomy Tubal reconstructive surgery
  • 31.
    Falloposcopy Hysteroscopic procedurewith cannulation of the Fallopian tubes Can be useful for diagnosis of intraluminal pathology Promising technique but not yet widespread
  • 32.
  • 33.
    Corpus Asherman SyndromeDiagnosis by HSG or hysteroscopy Usually s/p D+C, myomectomy, other intrauterine surgery Associated with hypo/amenorrhea, recurrent miscarriage Fibroids, Uterine Anomalies Rarely associated with infertility Work-up: Ultrasound Hysteroscopy Laparoscopy
  • 34.
  • 35.
    Cervical Function InfectionUreaplasma suspected Stenosis S/P LEEP, Cryosurgery, Cone biopsy (probably overstated) Immunologic Factors Sperm-mucus interaction
  • 36.
    Cervical Function Tests:Culture for suspected pathogens Postcoital test (PK tests) Scheduled around 1-2d before ovulation (increased estrogen effect) 48 0 of male abstinence before test No lubricants Evaluate 8-12h after coitus (overnight is ok!) Remove mucus from cervix (forceps, syringe)
  • 37.
    Cervical Function PK,continued (normal values in yellow) Quantity (very subjective) Quality (spinnbarkeit) (>8 cm) Clarity (clear) Ferning (branched) Viscosity (thin) WBC’s (~0) # progressively motile sperm/hpf (5-10/hpf) Gross sperm morphology (WNL) Male factors
  • 38.
    Problems with thePK test Subjective Timing varies; may need to be repeated In some studies, “infertile” couples with an abnormal PK conceived successfully during that same cycle
  • 39.
  • 40.
    Peritoneal Factors Endometriosis 2x relative risk of infertility Diagnosis (and best treatment) by laparoscopy Can be familial; can occur in adolescents Etiology unknown but likely multiple ones Retrograde menstruation Immunologic factors Genetics Bad karma Medical options remain suboptimal
  • 41.
  • 42.
    Male Factors SerumT, FSH, PRL levels Semen analysis Testicular biopsy Sperm penetration assay (SPA)
  • 43.
    Male Factors-Semen AnalysisCollected after 48 0 of abstinence Evaluated within one hour of ejaculation If abnormal parameters, repeat twice, 2 weeks apart
  • 44.
  • 45.
    Sperm Penetration Assayaka “zona-free hamster ova assay” Dynamic test of fertilization capacity of sperm Failure to penetrate at least 10% of zona-free ova consistent with male factor False positives and negatives exist
  • 46.
  • 47.
    Ovarian Disorders AnovulationClomiphene Citrate ± hCG hMG Induction + IUI (often done but unjustified) PRL Bromocriptine TSS if macroadenoma POF ?high-dose hMG (not very effective)
  • 48.
    Ovarian Disorders Centralamenorrhea CC first, then hMG Pulsatile GnRH LPD Progesterone suppositories during luteal phase CC ± hCG
  • 49.
  • 50.
    Ovulation Induction CC70% induction rate, ~40% pregnancy rate Patients should typically be normoestrogenic Induce menses and start on day 5 With dosages, antiestrogen effects dominate Multifetal rates 5-10% Monitor effects with PK, pelvic exam
  • 51.
    hMG (Pergonal) LH+FSH (also FSH alone = Metrodin) For patients with hypogonadotrophic hypoestrogenism or normal FSH and E 2 levels Close monitoring essential, including estradiol levels 60-80% pregnancy rates overall, lower for PCOS patients 10-15% multifetal pregnancy rate
  • 52.
    Risks CCVasomotor symptoms H/A Ovarian enlargement Multiple gestation NO risk of SAb or malformations hMG Multiple gestation OHSS (~1%) Can often be managed as outpatient Diuresis Severe cases fatal if untreated in ICU setting
  • 53.
    Fallopian Tubes TuboplastyIVF GIFT, ZIFT not options
  • 54.
    Corpus Asherman syndromeHysteroscopic lysis of adhesions (scissor) Postop Abx, E 2 Fibroids (rarely need treatment) Myomectomy(hysteroscopic, laparoscopic, open) ??UAE Uterine anomalies (rarely need treatment) metroplasty
  • 55.
    Cervix Repeat PKtest to rule out inaccurate timing of test If cervicitis Abx If scant mucus low-dose estrogen Sperm motility issues (? Antisperm AB’s) Steroids? IUI
  • 56.
    Peritoneum (Endometriosis) Froma fertility standpoint, excision beats medical management Lysis of adhesions GnRH-a (not a cure and has side effects, expense) Danazol (side effects, cost) Continuous OCP’s (poor fertility rates) Chances of pregnancy highest within 6 mos-1 year after treatment
  • 57.
    Male Factor HypogonadotrophismhMG GnRH CC, hCG results poor Varicocoele Ligation? (no definitive data yet) Retrograde ejaculation Ephedrine, imipramine AIH with recovered sperm
  • 58.
    Male Factor Idiopathicoligospermia No effective treatment ?IVF donor insemination
  • 59.
    Unexplained Infertility 5-10%of couples Consider PRL, laparoscopy, other hormonal tests, cultures, ASA testing, SPA if not done Review previous tests for validity Empiric treatment: Ovulation induction Abx IUI Consider IVF and its variants Adoption
  • 60.
    Summary Infertility isa common problem Infertility is a disease of couples Evaluation must be thorough, but individualized Treatment is available, including IVF, but can be expensive, invasive, and of limited efficacy in some cases Consultation with a BC/BE reproductive endocrinologist is advisable
  • 61.