KISSAN JAM
History and Evolution 
• Kissan till now -Acquired by Brooke Bond in 1993 from UB group- 
Separated from Brooke Bond as an independent brand under HUL 
• Kissan’s current scenario : 
Market Share(in %) 
X Axis:Kissan Products 
Y Axis: Percentage divisions: 1 unit = 1% 
Jam Ketchup Squash
Parent Company HUL 
Category Food Product 
Sector Food Products 
Tagline/ Slogan Jamilicious 
KISSAN JAM 
USP Most popular jam brand
STP 
Segment People wanting to have a sweet breakfast 
Target Group All people in the upper and middle class 
Positioning Makes food interesting
MARKETING STRATEGY 
• Advertising : 
Television 
Print Media 
Hoardings 
• Sales Promotion : 
Consumer Sales Promotion 
Trade Sales Promotion
TYPE OF PRODUCT 
• Kissan jam 
Pineapple 
strawberry 
Mango 
Apple 
Mixed fruit
4 P’s OF MARKETING MIX 
Price 
• Allowances and deals 
• Distribution and retailer mark-ups 
• Discount structure 
Product 
• Quality 
• Models and sizes 
• Packaging 
• Brands and Service 
Promotion 
• Advertising 
• Sales promotion 
• Personal selling 
• Publicity 
Place 
• Channels of distribution 
• Outlet location 
• Sales territories 
• Warehousing system
TARGET 
• Promotional schemes and offers specially for kids who are the 
main target customers by the company. 
• Interacted with targets in parenting &motherhood, women, men, 
bargain shopping and marketing and advertising communities 
through word of mouth messaging, digital PR, and micro-blogging 
to build awareness 
• Kisaan also innovated in packaging.This was good enough to 
attract children.With competitors like Sil,Tops this brand attracted 
the children and provide them with a better,healthy and tastier 
food Product
SWOT ANALYSIS 
Strength 
1. Strong brand name 
2.Excellent advertising and visibility 
3.Good product distribution and availability 
4.Lots of flavors and varieties available 
Weakness 1.Food products have a limited shelf life 
Opportunity 
1. Tie-ups with corporates 
2.Cheaper packets for rural areas 
Threats 
1.Health conscious people avoiding sweet 
2.Honey
COMPETITORS 
1. Mala Jam 
2.Mapro Jam 
3.Druk Jam
CONCLUSION 
• 46 % of our sample responded that they prefer jam with bread 
• 90% of the jam consumer consume kissan jam 
• 100% of the sample found kissanjam to be available anywhere 
• KIssan jam customers are highly loyal towards the product 
• Only68% of the sample could recall advertisement of kissan jam 
• The ad with a celebrity endorsing had a higher brand recall

Kissan jam

  • 1.
  • 2.
    History and Evolution • Kissan till now -Acquired by Brooke Bond in 1993 from UB group- Separated from Brooke Bond as an independent brand under HUL • Kissan’s current scenario : Market Share(in %) X Axis:Kissan Products Y Axis: Percentage divisions: 1 unit = 1% Jam Ketchup Squash
  • 3.
    Parent Company HUL Category Food Product Sector Food Products Tagline/ Slogan Jamilicious KISSAN JAM USP Most popular jam brand
  • 4.
    STP Segment Peoplewanting to have a sweet breakfast Target Group All people in the upper and middle class Positioning Makes food interesting
  • 5.
    MARKETING STRATEGY •Advertising : Television Print Media Hoardings • Sales Promotion : Consumer Sales Promotion Trade Sales Promotion
  • 6.
    TYPE OF PRODUCT • Kissan jam Pineapple strawberry Mango Apple Mixed fruit
  • 7.
    4 P’s OFMARKETING MIX Price • Allowances and deals • Distribution and retailer mark-ups • Discount structure Product • Quality • Models and sizes • Packaging • Brands and Service Promotion • Advertising • Sales promotion • Personal selling • Publicity Place • Channels of distribution • Outlet location • Sales territories • Warehousing system
  • 8.
    TARGET • Promotionalschemes and offers specially for kids who are the main target customers by the company. • Interacted with targets in parenting &motherhood, women, men, bargain shopping and marketing and advertising communities through word of mouth messaging, digital PR, and micro-blogging to build awareness • Kisaan also innovated in packaging.This was good enough to attract children.With competitors like Sil,Tops this brand attracted the children and provide them with a better,healthy and tastier food Product
  • 9.
    SWOT ANALYSIS Strength 1. Strong brand name 2.Excellent advertising and visibility 3.Good product distribution and availability 4.Lots of flavors and varieties available Weakness 1.Food products have a limited shelf life Opportunity 1. Tie-ups with corporates 2.Cheaper packets for rural areas Threats 1.Health conscious people avoiding sweet 2.Honey
  • 10.
    COMPETITORS 1. MalaJam 2.Mapro Jam 3.Druk Jam
  • 11.
    CONCLUSION • 46% of our sample responded that they prefer jam with bread • 90% of the jam consumer consume kissan jam • 100% of the sample found kissanjam to be available anywhere • KIssan jam customers are highly loyal towards the product • Only68% of the sample could recall advertisement of kissan jam • The ad with a celebrity endorsing had a higher brand recall