Dr. Johnson praised Shakespeare in his "Preface to Shakespeare" for his fidelity to human nature and realistic portrayal of characters. Though he found faults in some of Shakespeare's plots and comic scenes, Johnson believed Shakespeare excelled at depicting the truths of human psychology and capturing the diversity of human passions and motives. While Shakespeare violated the classical unities of time and place, Johnson argued this was not really a fault, and that the unities were not essential to a good play. Overall, Johnson provided a largely balanced critique and is credited with recognizing Shakespeare's profound understanding of human nature.

1. DR. JOHNSON AS A CRITIC of SHAKESPEARE
INTRODUCTION: Dr. Johnson is one of the greatest critics. As a literary critic he was an
exponent of classicism. He condemned everything that did not conform to classical doctrines. He is
almost always penetrating and stimulating. His 'Preface to Shakespeare' is considered as one of the
noblest monuments of English neo-classical criticism. His judgment of Shakespeare marks the date
in the history of criticism.
FIDELITY TO FACTS OF NATURE: 'The Preface to Shakespeare' deals with Johnson's
judgment of Shakespeare as a dramatist. According to Johnson, the basic requirement of literary
greatness is fidelity to facts of nature. This is clearly the neo-classical theory of art as imitation.
Johnson praises Shakespeare for meeting this requirement fully and most satisfactorily. According to
him, Shakespeare is, par excellence, the poet of nature. He holds up to his readers a faithful mirror of
manners and of life. His characters have a universal appeal. They act and speak like human beings.
They are commonly a species.
SHAKESPEARE'S REALISM: Johnson has praised Shakespeare's realism. He says that his
depiction of the truth of human nature and human psychology is praiseworthy. He portrayed human
characters in a realistic manner. His plays are full of practical axioms and domestic wisdom. He does
not depict love as the major human motive and emotion. He knew that love is only one of many
passions. It has no great influence upon the totality of life. Thus, it has little operation in the drama of
Shakespeare. Johnson discusses the realistic quality of Shakespeare's dialogues too.
MINGLING OF TRAGIC AND COMIC ELEMENT: ‘In Preface to Shakespeare’ Dr.
Johnson defends Shakespeare for his mingling of the tragic and comic elements in his plays on the
grounds of realism and historical background. According to him such mingling only serves to show
us the world in which the loss of one man is the gain of another. In other words, Shakespeare was
equally at home in writing tragic and comic plays. He could combine comic and tragic elements in
one and the same play. Almost all his plays are divided between serious and ludicrous characters and
they sometimes produce sorrow and sometimes laughter.
THREE UNITIES: Shakespeare has been charged for his neglect of the unities of time and
place. But Johnson defends him in this matter. According to him this neglect is not really a fault. He
argues that if an audience in a theatre can accept the stage as a locality in the city of Rome, they will
also accept the change from Rome to Alexandria. The unity of time may likewise be violated on the
same principle. He concludes this discussion by saying that the unities of time and place are not
essential to a good play.
FAULTS OF SHAKESPEARE: In his "Preface" Johnson defends Shakespeare in many
matters, but he does not consider him to be a faultless dramatist. According to him, Shakespeare tries
more to please his audience than to instruct them. It seems that he writes without any moral purpose.
His plots are often very loosely formed and carelessly pursued. His comic scenes are seldom very
successful. In such scenes the jests are generally indecent. Johnson does not take a favourable view
of Shakespeare's tragic plays. He accuses him of employing a disproportionate pomp of diction. He
condemns Shakespeare for inappropriate use of idle conceit and his over-fondness for quibbles.
CONCLUSION: Thus, Johnson is a great critic. His "Preface" is called as a balanced estimate.
Here Johnson shows his penetrating power that probes to the very core of Shakespeare's art. It
reveals its deep humanity and its sovereign realism. His praise of Shakespeare as the dramatist of
realism par excellence is wholly justified and convincing.