Issues and Attitude, Tension
between elitism and grassroot
Schnieder
AMNA FAYYAZ
• India, Nigeria, Kenya, or South Africa this is definitely no longer the
whole story. There is a huge demand for English also among those
with little formal education, precisely out of this instrumental
motivation, because knowledge of English promises some degree of
social mobility and access to better paid jobs. So English, in practice
means indigenous forms of it, is also spreading rapidly among the less
educated, often for specific purposes such as to achieve a limited
communicative ability in trade or tourism.
Issues
• So, while much of the public and scholarly attention is attracted by
issues of education and by standard and educated usage, relatively
little is known about the grassroots growth, the natural (if informal)
acquisition and rapid, uncontrolled spread of English in many
countries. It may happen completely naturally, through unguided
natural second language acquisition in contact with speakers of
English, and also, probably more regularly, in some sort of schooling
context, though in comparison these tend to be schools with little
funding and of limited quality.
• What is important here is the expansion of English into primary
school education in many countries – also a problematic and
controversial issue, because education in one’s native language at
least through the first few years of schooling is an elementary human
right, but at the same time the demand for English is brought forward
by many parents.
• More documentation on the grassroots spread of English in many
countries would be desirable – this seems a neglected subject,
perhaps because of the traditional emphasis on “good usage” and the
need for it. It remains to be seen where this process will lead, but it
seems clear that it is a very powerful one and adds an important
component to the top-centered, official views of Englishes
Attitude
• These varying patterns of transmission, acquisition and use have
produced an equally wide range of possible attitudes and reactions.
Authorities and politicians everywhere promote the standard variety,
partly for fear of loosing competitiveness in international
communication, notably business. Singapore’s “Speak Good English
Movement,” run since 2002, is a classic case in point, and a
phenomenon known as the “complaint tradition,” public laments
about standards of English declining, can be observed in very many
countries (and is characteristic of a specific developmental stage, the
threat which conservative observers perceive in nativization).
• But governments may be able to prescribe language policies and
school standards but they do not control people’s minds – and I am
convinced that in the long run what people really think and want to
do. The strong and stubborn defense of the use of Singlish against an
official government position in Singapore, a country not really known
for its grassroots democracy, is a very telling case in point.
• It remains to be seen whether attitudes towards English will move
beyond purely utilitarian considerations on a larger scale. Only if
indigenous varieties of English will grow to be the language of
people’s hearts, expressions of their regional identities and of
community solidarity, will these varieties ultimately survive and
stabilize in many Outer Circle countries.
• There is also the opposite possibility, the perception of English as
purely elitist (whether this is to be viewed as a danger is open to
discussion). If it becomes the property of an upper stratum of society
only and is felt to be elitist and socially exclusive, it may be rejected
by the population at large. Again, this is more a question of
perception than of reality.
• Who are the primary users of English in Outer Circle countries today?

Issues, Attitude, Tension between Elitism and Grassroots

  • 1.
    Issues and Attitude,Tension between elitism and grassroot Schnieder AMNA FAYYAZ
  • 2.
    • India, Nigeria,Kenya, or South Africa this is definitely no longer the whole story. There is a huge demand for English also among those with little formal education, precisely out of this instrumental motivation, because knowledge of English promises some degree of social mobility and access to better paid jobs. So English, in practice means indigenous forms of it, is also spreading rapidly among the less educated, often for specific purposes such as to achieve a limited communicative ability in trade or tourism.
  • 3.
    Issues • So, whilemuch of the public and scholarly attention is attracted by issues of education and by standard and educated usage, relatively little is known about the grassroots growth, the natural (if informal) acquisition and rapid, uncontrolled spread of English in many countries. It may happen completely naturally, through unguided natural second language acquisition in contact with speakers of English, and also, probably more regularly, in some sort of schooling context, though in comparison these tend to be schools with little funding and of limited quality.
  • 4.
    • What isimportant here is the expansion of English into primary school education in many countries – also a problematic and controversial issue, because education in one’s native language at least through the first few years of schooling is an elementary human right, but at the same time the demand for English is brought forward by many parents. • More documentation on the grassroots spread of English in many countries would be desirable – this seems a neglected subject, perhaps because of the traditional emphasis on “good usage” and the need for it. It remains to be seen where this process will lead, but it seems clear that it is a very powerful one and adds an important component to the top-centered, official views of Englishes
  • 5.
    Attitude • These varyingpatterns of transmission, acquisition and use have produced an equally wide range of possible attitudes and reactions. Authorities and politicians everywhere promote the standard variety, partly for fear of loosing competitiveness in international communication, notably business. Singapore’s “Speak Good English Movement,” run since 2002, is a classic case in point, and a phenomenon known as the “complaint tradition,” public laments about standards of English declining, can be observed in very many countries (and is characteristic of a specific developmental stage, the threat which conservative observers perceive in nativization).
  • 6.
    • But governmentsmay be able to prescribe language policies and school standards but they do not control people’s minds – and I am convinced that in the long run what people really think and want to do. The strong and stubborn defense of the use of Singlish against an official government position in Singapore, a country not really known for its grassroots democracy, is a very telling case in point.
  • 7.
    • It remainsto be seen whether attitudes towards English will move beyond purely utilitarian considerations on a larger scale. Only if indigenous varieties of English will grow to be the language of people’s hearts, expressions of their regional identities and of community solidarity, will these varieties ultimately survive and stabilize in many Outer Circle countries.
  • 8.
    • There isalso the opposite possibility, the perception of English as purely elitist (whether this is to be viewed as a danger is open to discussion). If it becomes the property of an upper stratum of society only and is felt to be elitist and socially exclusive, it may be rejected by the population at large. Again, this is more a question of perception than of reality.
  • 9.
    • Who arethe primary users of English in Outer Circle countries today?