Isstm merit rating, promotions & transfers
•
1 like•770 views
This document discusses various methods used for employee performance evaluation and merit rating including ranking, grading, graphic scales, man-to-man comparison, checklists, forced choice, and critical incident selection. It also describes different types of promotions and transfers within an organization based on merit, seniority, suitability, need, performance, and time. Finally, it discusses the purposes of transfers including organizational effectiveness, enhancing skills, managing fluctuations, optimizing the workforce, and avoiding favoritism.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Merit ratting apoorv dixit
This document discusses various methods for performance appraisal and merit rating. It outlines traditional methods like confidential reports, essays, rankings and checklists. Modern methods discussed include assessment centers, human resource accounting, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and appraisal through management by objectives (MBO). The document also defines key terms like job analysis, job design, and job evaluation which are components for defining jobs and determining merit ratings. Factors for merit ratings beyond job performance are also listed.
Ch 4 merit rating and job details
The document discusses various aspects of job analysis, including developing job descriptions, specifications, and performance evaluations. It also discusses techniques for motivating employees, such as job enrichment which provides challenges, and job rotation which exposes employees to different areas of a company. The overall purpose is to classify different methods for analyzing jobs and developing employees.
Job evaluation-ppt
This document discusses job evaluation, which is a systematic process for determining the value or worth of jobs within an organization. It describes the main steps in job evaluation, which include deciding which jobs to evaluate, analyzing each job and preparing descriptions, rating jobs based on selected evaluation factors, and comparing jobs to determine appropriate compensation. The key factors used in evaluating jobs are knowledge, problem-solving abilities, and accountability. Several common methods for conducting job evaluations are also outlined, including ranking, classification, point, and factor comparison methods, along with their advantages and disadvantages.
Merits and demerits - method of job evaluation - compensation management - ...
The point method is a superior and widely used method of evaluating jobs. It forces raters to look into all key factors and sub-factors of a job.
Mba ii hrm u-3.3 performance appraisal & job evaluation
This document provides an overview of performance appraisal and job evaluation in human resource management. It defines performance appraisal as an objective assessment of an individual's performance against benchmarks. The objectives of performance appraisal include effecting promotions, assessing training needs, determining pay raises, and improving communication. Methods of performance appraisal include rating scales, critical incidents, 360-degree feedback, and management by objectives. The document also discusses job evaluation as assessing the relative worth of jobs to determine salary differentials, and compares key differences between performance appraisal and job evaluation.
Job evaluation ppt
The document discusses job evaluation, which is defined as the process of determining the relative worth of jobs within an organization. It considers factors like responsibilities, output, decision-making authority, and skills required. The objectives of job evaluation include establishing fair wages, minimizing discrimination, and ensuring positions are ranked appropriately. Common methods include ranking, paired comparison, point-based systems, and job classification. The process involves analyzing job descriptions, selecting an evaluation plan, classifying positions, implementing the program, and maintaining it over time. Job evaluation aims to create a standardized and equitable compensation structure.
Job analysis,merit rating,evaluation
The document is a presentation about job analysis, merit ratings, evaluation, and assessment. It contains definitions of key terms, methods used in job analysis like observation and interviews, steps in job analysis, uses of job analysis, and objectives and methods of merit ratings like grading scales and forced choice descriptions. Evaluation types like internal, external, formative, and summative evaluation are defined. Functions of assessment like formative, summative, and educative assessment are also outlined.
Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]
The Hay Guide Chart Method is a popular job evaluation method that assesses jobs based on three factors: know-how, problem solving, and accountability. It provides a systematic way to evaluate different jobs and determine their relative worth. Each factor is evaluated based on standardized dimensions and levels, with points assigned to determine an overall ranking. This allows for consistent measurement of job requirements and responsibilities across an organization. The rankings can then be used to establish a fair pay structure and ensure positions are properly compensated relative to their value and contribution.
Recommended
Merit ratting apoorv dixit
This document discusses various methods for performance appraisal and merit rating. It outlines traditional methods like confidential reports, essays, rankings and checklists. Modern methods discussed include assessment centers, human resource accounting, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and appraisal through management by objectives (MBO). The document also defines key terms like job analysis, job design, and job evaluation which are components for defining jobs and determining merit ratings. Factors for merit ratings beyond job performance are also listed.
Ch 4 merit rating and job details
The document discusses various aspects of job analysis, including developing job descriptions, specifications, and performance evaluations. It also discusses techniques for motivating employees, such as job enrichment which provides challenges, and job rotation which exposes employees to different areas of a company. The overall purpose is to classify different methods for analyzing jobs and developing employees.
Job evaluation-ppt
This document discusses job evaluation, which is a systematic process for determining the value or worth of jobs within an organization. It describes the main steps in job evaluation, which include deciding which jobs to evaluate, analyzing each job and preparing descriptions, rating jobs based on selected evaluation factors, and comparing jobs to determine appropriate compensation. The key factors used in evaluating jobs are knowledge, problem-solving abilities, and accountability. Several common methods for conducting job evaluations are also outlined, including ranking, classification, point, and factor comparison methods, along with their advantages and disadvantages.
Merits and demerits - method of job evaluation - compensation management - ...
The point method is a superior and widely used method of evaluating jobs. It forces raters to look into all key factors and sub-factors of a job.
Mba ii hrm u-3.3 performance appraisal & job evaluation
This document provides an overview of performance appraisal and job evaluation in human resource management. It defines performance appraisal as an objective assessment of an individual's performance against benchmarks. The objectives of performance appraisal include effecting promotions, assessing training needs, determining pay raises, and improving communication. Methods of performance appraisal include rating scales, critical incidents, 360-degree feedback, and management by objectives. The document also discusses job evaluation as assessing the relative worth of jobs to determine salary differentials, and compares key differences between performance appraisal and job evaluation.
Job evaluation ppt
The document discusses job evaluation, which is defined as the process of determining the relative worth of jobs within an organization. It considers factors like responsibilities, output, decision-making authority, and skills required. The objectives of job evaluation include establishing fair wages, minimizing discrimination, and ensuring positions are ranked appropriately. Common methods include ranking, paired comparison, point-based systems, and job classification. The process involves analyzing job descriptions, selecting an evaluation plan, classifying positions, implementing the program, and maintaining it over time. Job evaluation aims to create a standardized and equitable compensation structure.
Job analysis,merit rating,evaluation
The document is a presentation about job analysis, merit ratings, evaluation, and assessment. It contains definitions of key terms, methods used in job analysis like observation and interviews, steps in job analysis, uses of job analysis, and objectives and methods of merit ratings like grading scales and forced choice descriptions. Evaluation types like internal, external, formative, and summative evaluation are defined. Functions of assessment like formative, summative, and educative assessment are also outlined.
Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]
The Hay Guide Chart Method is a popular job evaluation method that assesses jobs based on three factors: know-how, problem solving, and accountability. It provides a systematic way to evaluate different jobs and determine their relative worth. Each factor is evaluated based on standardized dimensions and levels, with points assigned to determine an overall ranking. This allows for consistent measurement of job requirements and responsibilities across an organization. The rankings can then be used to establish a fair pay structure and ensure positions are properly compensated relative to their value and contribution.
Classification/Grading method of job evaluation - compensation management -...
According to this method, a predetermined number of job groups or job classes are established and jobs are assigned to these classifications.
Job evaluation process - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
The process of job evaluation involves the following steps:
Gaining acceptance.
Creating job evaluation committee.
Finding the jobs to be evaluated.
Analyzing and preparing job description.
Selecting the method of evaluation.
Classifying jobs.
Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatages
This document discusses job evaluation, which is a systematic process for determining the value or worth of jobs within an organization. It describes the main steps in job evaluation, which include deciding which jobs to evaluate, analyzing each job and preparing descriptions, rating jobs based on selected evaluation factors, and comparing jobs to determine appropriate compensation. The key factors used in evaluating jobs are knowledge, problem-solving abilities, and accountability. Several common methods for conducting job evaluations are also outlined, including ranking, classification, point, and factor comparison methods, along with their advantages and disadvantages.
Limitations of method of job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Me...
Job evaluation is not completely scientific.
The most of the techniques are difficult to understand, even for the supervisors.
4.2 job evaluation and merit rating
The document discusses job evaluation and merit rating. It describes job evaluation as a process to systematically determine the worth of each job based on factors like skill, effort, and responsibility. The objectives of job evaluation are to establish a fair wage system and eliminate inequalities. The key steps in job evaluation are job analysis, developing job descriptions and specifications, and using a rating system to evaluate jobs. Common rating systems are ranking, classification, factor comparison, and point rating methods. Merit rating aims to assess employee performance relative to their job requirements.
Job evaluation
This document provides details about a job evaluation case study conducted by Hongkong Electric Company in 1984. The company hired an external consultant to design and evaluate benchmark jobs to establish a new salary scale. Job descriptions were developed for benchmark positions through interviews. A benchmark committee evaluated the jobs and scored them on factors like knowledge, problem-solving, and accountability. Over 800 non-benchmark jobs were also evaluated by comparing them to benchmark jobs, with the results reviewed by a non-benchmark committee. The goals of the job evaluation were to increase pay fairness and reduce disparities between local and expatriate salaries.
Job evaluation
This document discusses job evaluation, which is defined as a systematic process for determining the relative worth of jobs within an organization in order to establish pay structures. Job evaluation is important for maintaining accurate job descriptions, setting fair job rankings and pay scales, and reducing grievances. There are analytical methods that use quantitative factors and rankings, like point-ranking and factor comparison, and non-analytical methods like ranking, paired comparison, and job grading that rely more on subjective evaluations. To make job evaluation effective, organizations should involve employees, train evaluators well, get management support, clearly define job factors, focus on jobs not individuals, and consider union views.
Job evaluation and performance appraisal
This is my first presentation made on job evaluation. I think it will be quite helpful for the people who want to know about the difference between job evaluation and performance appraisal.
Job evaluation
Job evaluation is a systematic process for determining the relative worth of jobs in an organization. It involves analyzing jobs and classifying them based on factors like skills, education, experience, responsibilities, and working conditions. A job evaluation committee is appointed to evaluate jobs using a selected method. The process includes gaining acceptance, analyzing jobs and creating job descriptions, classifying jobs, and establishing pay grades. Job evaluation aims to create an equitable wage structure by linking pay to job requirements. When done properly with employee input, it can identify inequities and help determine appropriate compensation. However, it is also a time-consuming and complex process that is not entirely objective. Buy-in from employees is critical for the success of any job evaluation system.
Job Evaluation PPT
This document discusses job evaluation, which is a systematic process to determine the relative worth of jobs within an organization. It mentions the merits and demerits of job evaluation as well as the common methods used, which include ranking, grading, point rating, and factor comparison. The summary evaluates jobs based on factors like skills, effort, training, responsibilities, and assigns weights or points to determine each job's value in order to establish a rational pay structure.
Job evaluation
Job evaluation involves systematically determining the value or worth of jobs in an organization. It answers questions like which jobs to evaluate, who will evaluate, and what criteria to use. There are analytical methods like point ranking and factor comparison, and non-analytical methods like ranking and grading. Ranking simply compares jobs based on overall worth. Grading groups jobs into classes and grades with increasing responsibilities. Banding groups similar jobs together into bands. The objective is to determine pay levels and hierarchies based on duties, skills needed, and other job factors.
Job evaluation
Job evaluation is the process by which companies determine employee compensation. It involves analyzing each job based on factors like education, responsibility, discretion, and impact levels. Jobs are then evaluated and assigned levels that determine salaries and financial/non-financial rewards. Techniques for job evaluation include non-quantitative methods like simple ranking, paired comparison, and grading. Quantitative methods include point, factor comparison, and Hay methods. Job evaluation aims to establish a fair wage structure by assessing the relative worth of different jobs.
Job evaluation
The content related to Job Evaluation is presented properly. Job Evaluation being important task in the organization and a very important topic for the students from HR field. This will help them.
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisal means the systematic evaluation of the performance of an expert or his immediate superior. Performance appraisal is a method of evaluating the behavior of employees in the work spot, normally including both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of job performance. Performance here refers to the degree of accomplishment of the tasks that make up an individual's job. It indicates how well an individual is fulfilling the job demands.
Computer aided job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
This document discusses computer aided job evaluation. It notes that computer aided job evaluation simplifies the job analysis process, keeps job descriptions up to date, increases objectivity, and reduces time spent in meetings. It also increases reliability by automating checking of questionnaires and outputs. While computer aided job evaluation automates routine tasks, the systems are only as good as their designers.
Job evaluation
The document discusses job evaluation methods used to determine the value of jobs within an organization. It describes the point method approach which assigns points to compensable job factors like skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions based on their degree. The points are totaled to determine a job's value and establish appropriate pay scales. Six key steps are outlined: 1) determine factors, 2) scale and weight factors, 3) assign points, 4) calculate totals, 5) link points to salaries. Common job evaluation factors and how the Hay System approach works are also summarized.
Hay group
Job evaluation is a systematic process that ranks jobs by comparing them based on factors like know-how, problem solving, and accountability. The Hay Guide Chart-Profile Method is one of the most widely used job evaluation systems. It evaluates jobs based on three factors - know-how, problem solving, and accountability - and assigns points to determine a ranking. The ranking can then be used to assess internal pay equity and compare pay levels to market data. However, critics argue the Hay system is complicated, emphasizes management roles, and may not be well-suited to collaborative work environments.
Job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
A job evaluation is a systematic way of determining the value/worth of a job in relation to other jobs in an organization.
Job evaluation
Job evaluation is a systematic process that analyzes and evaluates jobs to determine their relative worth within an organization. This establishes a fair pay structure and forms the basis for compensation management. The objectives are to determine the value of different jobs, their position in the organizational hierarchy, and maintain internal and external pay consistency. The process involves job analysis, descriptions, selecting evaluation factors, classifying jobs based on their values, implementing the system, and updating it over time. Non-quantitative techniques include ranking and comparing jobs based on skills and responsibilities. Quantitative methods use point rating or factor comparison, where jobs are evaluated on factors and assigned monetary values.
Job evaluation
Job evaluation, objectives, need of job evaluation, methods,ranking method,point method, classification method, factor comparision method.
Job evaluation & merit rating
Job evaluation is a technique used to assess the relative worth of jobs within an organization. It involves analyzing job duties, responsibilities, skills required, and working conditions to determine a ranking or grade for each job. This ranking establishes the basis for internal pay structures but does not directly determine pay levels. Job evaluation methods can be analytical, involving point-based assessments of job factors, or non-analytical, such as simple ranking or grading of jobs. The process typically involves job analysis to develop job descriptions and specifications which are then used in the evaluation.
Performance appraisal
This document discusses performance appraisals at TCS. It outlines the purposes of performance appraisals which include administrative, development, organizational, and documentation purposes. TCS conducts two appraisals annually using a balanced scorecard approach to evaluate employees on financial, customer, internal, and learning/growth metrics. Employees are rated on a 1-5 scale and those receiving low ratings in consecutive appraisals may be at risk of exit. TCS shuffles employees between projects every 18 months to prevent boredom and maintain performance.
More Related Content
What's hot
Classification/Grading method of job evaluation - compensation management -...
According to this method, a predetermined number of job groups or job classes are established and jobs are assigned to these classifications.
Job evaluation process - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
The process of job evaluation involves the following steps:
Gaining acceptance.
Creating job evaluation committee.
Finding the jobs to be evaluated.
Analyzing and preparing job description.
Selecting the method of evaluation.
Classifying jobs.
Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatages
This document discusses job evaluation, which is a systematic process for determining the value or worth of jobs within an organization. It describes the main steps in job evaluation, which include deciding which jobs to evaluate, analyzing each job and preparing descriptions, rating jobs based on selected evaluation factors, and comparing jobs to determine appropriate compensation. The key factors used in evaluating jobs are knowledge, problem-solving abilities, and accountability. Several common methods for conducting job evaluations are also outlined, including ranking, classification, point, and factor comparison methods, along with their advantages and disadvantages.
Limitations of method of job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Me...
Job evaluation is not completely scientific.
The most of the techniques are difficult to understand, even for the supervisors.
4.2 job evaluation and merit rating
The document discusses job evaluation and merit rating. It describes job evaluation as a process to systematically determine the worth of each job based on factors like skill, effort, and responsibility. The objectives of job evaluation are to establish a fair wage system and eliminate inequalities. The key steps in job evaluation are job analysis, developing job descriptions and specifications, and using a rating system to evaluate jobs. Common rating systems are ranking, classification, factor comparison, and point rating methods. Merit rating aims to assess employee performance relative to their job requirements.
Job evaluation
This document provides details about a job evaluation case study conducted by Hongkong Electric Company in 1984. The company hired an external consultant to design and evaluate benchmark jobs to establish a new salary scale. Job descriptions were developed for benchmark positions through interviews. A benchmark committee evaluated the jobs and scored them on factors like knowledge, problem-solving, and accountability. Over 800 non-benchmark jobs were also evaluated by comparing them to benchmark jobs, with the results reviewed by a non-benchmark committee. The goals of the job evaluation were to increase pay fairness and reduce disparities between local and expatriate salaries.
Job evaluation
This document discusses job evaluation, which is defined as a systematic process for determining the relative worth of jobs within an organization in order to establish pay structures. Job evaluation is important for maintaining accurate job descriptions, setting fair job rankings and pay scales, and reducing grievances. There are analytical methods that use quantitative factors and rankings, like point-ranking and factor comparison, and non-analytical methods like ranking, paired comparison, and job grading that rely more on subjective evaluations. To make job evaluation effective, organizations should involve employees, train evaluators well, get management support, clearly define job factors, focus on jobs not individuals, and consider union views.
Job evaluation and performance appraisal
This is my first presentation made on job evaluation. I think it will be quite helpful for the people who want to know about the difference between job evaluation and performance appraisal.
Job evaluation
Job evaluation is a systematic process for determining the relative worth of jobs in an organization. It involves analyzing jobs and classifying them based on factors like skills, education, experience, responsibilities, and working conditions. A job evaluation committee is appointed to evaluate jobs using a selected method. The process includes gaining acceptance, analyzing jobs and creating job descriptions, classifying jobs, and establishing pay grades. Job evaluation aims to create an equitable wage structure by linking pay to job requirements. When done properly with employee input, it can identify inequities and help determine appropriate compensation. However, it is also a time-consuming and complex process that is not entirely objective. Buy-in from employees is critical for the success of any job evaluation system.
Job Evaluation PPT
This document discusses job evaluation, which is a systematic process to determine the relative worth of jobs within an organization. It mentions the merits and demerits of job evaluation as well as the common methods used, which include ranking, grading, point rating, and factor comparison. The summary evaluates jobs based on factors like skills, effort, training, responsibilities, and assigns weights or points to determine each job's value in order to establish a rational pay structure.
Job evaluation
Job evaluation involves systematically determining the value or worth of jobs in an organization. It answers questions like which jobs to evaluate, who will evaluate, and what criteria to use. There are analytical methods like point ranking and factor comparison, and non-analytical methods like ranking and grading. Ranking simply compares jobs based on overall worth. Grading groups jobs into classes and grades with increasing responsibilities. Banding groups similar jobs together into bands. The objective is to determine pay levels and hierarchies based on duties, skills needed, and other job factors.
Job evaluation
Job evaluation is the process by which companies determine employee compensation. It involves analyzing each job based on factors like education, responsibility, discretion, and impact levels. Jobs are then evaluated and assigned levels that determine salaries and financial/non-financial rewards. Techniques for job evaluation include non-quantitative methods like simple ranking, paired comparison, and grading. Quantitative methods include point, factor comparison, and Hay methods. Job evaluation aims to establish a fair wage structure by assessing the relative worth of different jobs.
Job evaluation
The content related to Job Evaluation is presented properly. Job Evaluation being important task in the organization and a very important topic for the students from HR field. This will help them.
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisal means the systematic evaluation of the performance of an expert or his immediate superior. Performance appraisal is a method of evaluating the behavior of employees in the work spot, normally including both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of job performance. Performance here refers to the degree of accomplishment of the tasks that make up an individual's job. It indicates how well an individual is fulfilling the job demands.
Computer aided job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
This document discusses computer aided job evaluation. It notes that computer aided job evaluation simplifies the job analysis process, keeps job descriptions up to date, increases objectivity, and reduces time spent in meetings. It also increases reliability by automating checking of questionnaires and outputs. While computer aided job evaluation automates routine tasks, the systems are only as good as their designers.
Job evaluation
The document discusses job evaluation methods used to determine the value of jobs within an organization. It describes the point method approach which assigns points to compensable job factors like skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions based on their degree. The points are totaled to determine a job's value and establish appropriate pay scales. Six key steps are outlined: 1) determine factors, 2) scale and weight factors, 3) assign points, 4) calculate totals, 5) link points to salaries. Common job evaluation factors and how the Hay System approach works are also summarized.
Hay group
Job evaluation is a systematic process that ranks jobs by comparing them based on factors like know-how, problem solving, and accountability. The Hay Guide Chart-Profile Method is one of the most widely used job evaluation systems. It evaluates jobs based on three factors - know-how, problem solving, and accountability - and assigns points to determine a ranking. The ranking can then be used to assess internal pay equity and compare pay levels to market data. However, critics argue the Hay system is complicated, emphasizes management roles, and may not be well-suited to collaborative work environments.
Job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
A job evaluation is a systematic way of determining the value/worth of a job in relation to other jobs in an organization.
Job evaluation
Job evaluation is a systematic process that analyzes and evaluates jobs to determine their relative worth within an organization. This establishes a fair pay structure and forms the basis for compensation management. The objectives are to determine the value of different jobs, their position in the organizational hierarchy, and maintain internal and external pay consistency. The process involves job analysis, descriptions, selecting evaluation factors, classifying jobs based on their values, implementing the system, and updating it over time. Non-quantitative techniques include ranking and comparing jobs based on skills and responsibilities. Quantitative methods use point rating or factor comparison, where jobs are evaluated on factors and assigned monetary values.
Job evaluation
Job evaluation, objectives, need of job evaluation, methods,ranking method,point method, classification method, factor comparision method.
What's hot (20)
Classification/Grading method of job evaluation - compensation management -...
Classification/Grading method of job evaluation - compensation management -...
Job evaluation process - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation process - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatages
Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatages
Limitations of method of job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Me...
Limitations of method of job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Me...
Computer aided job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
Computer aided job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
Viewers also liked
Job evaluation & merit rating
Job evaluation is a technique used to assess the relative worth of jobs within an organization. It involves analyzing job duties, responsibilities, skills required, and working conditions to determine a ranking or grade for each job. This ranking establishes the basis for internal pay structures but does not directly determine pay levels. Job evaluation methods can be analytical, involving point-based assessments of job factors, or non-analytical, such as simple ranking or grading of jobs. The process typically involves job analysis to develop job descriptions and specifications which are then used in the evaluation.
Performance appraisal
This document discusses performance appraisals at TCS. It outlines the purposes of performance appraisals which include administrative, development, organizational, and documentation purposes. TCS conducts two appraisals annually using a balanced scorecard approach to evaluate employees on financial, customer, internal, and learning/growth metrics. Employees are rated on a 1-5 scale and those receiving low ratings in consecutive appraisals may be at risk of exit. TCS shuffles employees between projects every 18 months to prevent boredom and maintain performance.
Case study of job evaluation
The document outlines the steps taken by a consulting firm to implement a job evaluation system for a pharmaceutical company. They devised a project plan, customized a job evaluation system to the company's needs, trained managers and union representatives, conducted job interviews and evaluations, and helped establish a new grading and compensation structure. Implementing the job evaluation system allowed the company to standardize job classifications and rates across different parts of the business.
Hrm: Performance Appraisal
This presentation includes Performance Appraisal, its meaning and definition and 5 of its traditional methods. It contains oral examples of each of them and also, the difference between Job Evaluation and Performance Appraisal.
Job evaluation methods
The document discusses various job evaluation methods, including ranking, classification, factor comparison, and point methods. It provides details on the advantages and disadvantages of each. It also provides an in-depth explanation of the Hay Guide Chart-Profile Method, including the three factors it uses (know-how, problem solving, and accountability) and how jobs are evaluated using questionnaires and a committee. The document outlines steps taken, such as periodic retraining and correlation studies, to ensure the Hay system is applied fairly. It explains how Hay points are used to determine salary ranges but do not directly impact individual salaries.
Hrm job evaluation
Job evaluation is a systematic process to determine the relative worth of jobs in an organization. It involves analyzing jobs, not individuals, and establishing a rational pay structure. The key steps are gaining acceptance, creating an evaluation committee, analyzing jobs, selecting an evaluation method, classifying jobs, installing the program, and periodic reviews. Common methods include ranking, classification, factor comparison, and point methods. While complex, the point method considers multiple compensable factors to determine appropriate pay levels.
JOB EVALUATION
This document outlines the steps in developing a total compensation strategy and discusses internal alignment, which refers to pay relationships among jobs within an organization. It also covers job analysis, which involves defining jobs by their tasks and skills requirements. The results of job analysis are used to create job descriptions and for job evaluation. Job evaluation is the systematic process of determining the relative worth of jobs within an organization based on factors like skills, effort, and responsibilities. Several common job evaluation methods are discussed, including ranking, classification, factor comparison, and point methods. The point method breaks jobs into compensable factors that are scaled and weighted to determine total points for each job.
Job evaluation
This document discusses different concepts and methods related to job evaluation. It covers the following key points in 3 sentences:
Job evaluation involves systematically evaluating jobs within an organization based on factors like skills, effort, responsibility, and working conditions to determine their relative worth and establish a pay structure. Common methods of job evaluation include ranking, classification, factor comparison, and point methods which break jobs down and compare them based on compensable factors. The goal of job evaluation is to establish equity and fairness in compensation by objectively assessing the value of different jobs within an organization.
Job Evaluation
Its has taken me 2 months to make this presentation on Job Evaluation which is based on mine actual learning & practice in my previous organization
Please click like & forward it others too
Please give your feedback & keep following
Rahul Kunwar
rajcite@gmail.com
+918051139888
Job Evaluation
Job evaluation is a systematic way to determine the relative worth of jobs within an organization. It aims to establish a rational pay structure by comparing jobs based on factors like skill, effort, and responsibility required. The main methods of job evaluation are ranking, classification, factor comparison, and point method. Ranking simply arranges jobs in order of value, while classification groups similar jobs into predefined grades. Factor comparison and point method assign scores to jobs based on how they rate on important compensable factors. While objective, job evaluation still involves some subjectivity and may require periodic review.
WCM (World Class Manufacturing)
The document discusses World Class Manufacturing (WCM), providing details on:
1. WCM principles focus on eliminating all types of losses through standards, methods, and employee involvement to achieve zero defects, waste, and downtime.
2. Tofaş, a Turkish automaker, achieved a "Silver Level" WCM rating, making it the first Fiat factory to reach this level based on quality, safety, and manufacturing excellence.
3. Main WCM activities include implementing basics like safety training, developing leaders, improving processes for quality, maintenance, and logistics, and making plant investments to increase efficiency and utilization.
Viewers also liked (11)
Similar to Isstm merit rating, promotions & transfers
Performance Appraisal of the employee.pptx
Performance appraisal is defined as the systematic evaluation of an employee's job performance and potential. It involves rating employees based on pre-determined criteria and standards. The key objectives of performance appraisal include assessing employee effectiveness, identifying training needs, and determining potential for promotion. Common methods for conducting performance appraisals include ranking, paired comparison, forced distribution, grading scales, checklists, and behavioral observation. Future-oriented methods include management by objectives, 360-degree feedback, and assessment centers.
performanceappraisal-160117065718.pdf
1) The document discusses performance appraisal, defining it as the systematic evaluation of an employee's job performance and potential.
2) It describes various methods of performance appraisal including ranking, paired comparison, forced distribution, grading, checklists, and future-oriented methods like MBO and 360-degree feedback.
3) The key components evaluated in performance appraisal are outlined as well as the process, limitations, obstacles, and potential problems in conducting accurate appraisals.
Performance Appraisal .pptx
The document discusses performance appraisals, which are formal evaluations of how employees perform their duties. Performance appraisals should be conducted in writing at least annually and include feedback shared with the employee. They are used for decisions around salary, promotion, training, and termination. Both traditional and modern methods are described, including confidential reports, essays, rankings, checklists, and 360-degree feedback. The goals of performance appraisals are determining training needs, providing feedback, and improving employee performance and development. Limitations include bias if the supervisor knows the employee well and the difficulty appraising some employee qualities.
Performance Appraisal
An all round insight into the Concepts of Performance Appraisal from the standpoint of its significance,objectives, process, methods & common errors.
Human Resource Management: Types of Appraisals
This document discusses employee performance appraisals. It defines appraisals as meetings where employees discuss their progress, goals and needs with their manager. It then describes several types of appraisal methods: trait-focused appraisals rate employees on attributes; behavior-focused appraisals rate specific behaviors; unstructured methods rely on subjective opinions; straight ranking compares employees; grading/checklists use letter grades or yes/no questions; management by objective uses agreed upon goals; and 360-degree feedback surveys coworkers and customers. The document outlines advantages as providing structure for feedback and insights, and disadvantages as potential negative experiences, time consumption and human biases.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Performance appraisal is an important managerial process used to evaluate how well employees perform their job duties. It generates information to determine salary adjustments, promotions, disciplinary actions, and terminations. To be effective, appraisals should be based on standardized measures that employees know in advance and have input in developing. The appraiser should observe the employee's work and have their trust. Various tools like rating scales, checklists, essays, and self-appraisals can be used, but all should aim for accuracy and avoid biases that skew results.
Performance appraisal
Thank you for the information. I will keep your organization in mind and wish you the best in achieving your important vision of improving healthcare access in India.
Performance appraisal
The document discusses performance appraisals, including their meaning, objectives, benefits, importance, types, and limitations. It defines performance appraisal as the systematic evaluation of an employee's job performance by their supervisor or manager. Performance appraisals are used to provide feedback to employees, determine salary and promotion decisions, identify training needs, and evaluate employee effectiveness. The document outlines various methods of conducting performance appraisals and emphasizes the importance of the appraisal interview in communicating evaluation results and developing employees.
Performance appraisal
This document discusses performance appraisals, including their definition, purpose, advantages, methods, and potential biases. Performance appraisals are used to evaluate employees, provide feedback, determine training needs, and make decisions about compensation, promotion, and retention. They have advantages like employee development, motivation, and communication. Common methods include critical incident reports, weighted checklists, rating scales, management by objectives, and 360 degree feedback. Potential biases can come from first impressions, halo effects, central tendency ratings, and personal biases of the evaluator.
Performanceappraisal k tauphik
Performance appraisal involves systematically evaluating an employee's job performance and potential for future roles. It is meant to identify training needs, provide feedback, and inform personnel decisions. There are various methods for conducting performance appraisals, including traditional methods like essays, rankings, and checklists as well as more modern approaches like management by objectives and 360-degree feedback. Both the process and tools used should be designed, communicated, and implemented carefully to ensure fair and meaningful evaluations.
Performance Appraisal PPT | Learn All about Performance Appraisal
Here is performance appraisal PPT for learning all about it such as meaning, definition, types, benefits methods, advantages or disadvantages and etc.
Visit here: https://www.hrhelpboard.com/
Performance Appraisal Dr.Rangappa.S.Ashi Associate Professor SDM Institute of...
Performance Evaluation/ Performance Appraisal is the process of evaluating the performance & progress of an employee of a group of employees on a given job & his/her potential for future development.
Chapter 6 Appraisal and Rewards
The document discusses performance appraisal and total reward systems. It defines performance appraisal as the systematic evaluation of employee performance to understand abilities for growth. It describes various performance appraisal methods like ranking, forced distribution, and checklists. It also discusses potential biases in performance appraisal like halo effect, leniency bias, and recentness effect. The document concludes by defining total rewards as all compensation and benefits perceived as valuable from employment, including pay, benefits, work-life programs, performance recognition, and career development opportunities.
IM326 JOB PERFORMANCE.pptx
The document discusses performance appraisal, which is defined as the systematic evaluation of an employee's job performance and productivity. It covers several key points:
- Performance appraisal aims to provide feedback to employees, identify training needs, document job criteria, and make decisions regarding benefits, promotions, disciplinary actions, etc.
- The process involves setting objectives, collecting data on performance, conducting appraisal interviews, setting future goals, and following up. Effective performance appraisals are fair, focus on behavior and results, and avoid biases.
- Regular performance appraisals provide benefits like improved communication, identification of strengths and weaknesses, and informed administrative decisions. When done properly, they can motivate employees and support career development.
Performance appraisal tools & methods
This document describes several methods for performance appraisal:
- The ranking method compares employees within a group but does not evaluate individuals. The paired comparison and forced distribution methods are better for large organizations but take more time.
- Grading defines employee abilities within certain grades like very good to poor. Checklists use yes/no questions about behaviors.
- Forced choice presents positive and negative statements and forces selection of one. Critical incidents evaluate based on real events.
- Graphic rating scales list traits on a continuum from unsatisfactory to outstanding. Field review involves supervisor interviews. Essay evaluation provides a written statement of strengths and weaknesses. Peer review involves evaluation by other employees.
Performance appraisals and management
Performance appraisal and performance management are related but distinct processes used in human resource management. Performance appraisal involves evaluating an employee's past performance against standards, while performance management is the ongoing process of setting goals, monitoring performance, and providing feedback to ensure employees are contributing to organizational goals. There are various methods for conducting performance appraisals, including rating scales, rankings, and behavioral observations. Both processes aim to continuously improve employee performance through goal setting, feedback, development, and rewards.
performance appraisals and management
Performance appraisal and performance management are related but distinct processes used in human resource management. Performance appraisal involves evaluating an employee's past performance against standards, while performance management is the ongoing process of setting goals, monitoring performance, providing feedback and coaching to help employees meet goals. There are various methods used for performance appraisal, including rating scales, rankings, behavioral observations and management by objectives. Both processes aim to improve employee performance and development.
Performance appraisal (HRM)BBA 3rd sem
The document discusses performance appraisals, which are systematic assessments of an employee's job performance and strengths/weaknesses. Performance appraisals have multiple purposes, including determining promotions, pay raises, training needs, and legal compliance. They involve establishing job expectations, designing an appraisal program, assessing performance through methods like rankings, checklists, and management by objectives, conducting performance reviews, and using the data for HR decisions. The goal is to provide feedback to employees and information to organizations about employee performance.
performance_appraisal_0.ppt
This document discusses performance appraisals, including their importance, objectives, process, methods, and tips for effective appraisals. It notes that performance appraisals are an important part of the employee experience and can stimulate morale when done fairly, but inaccurate appraisals can have the opposite effect. Various traditional and modern appraisal methods are described, such as essay, ranking, graphic rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. Barriers to effective appraisal and tips to overcome them are also outlined.
360 degree appraisal
This document discusses 360-degree appraisals. It defines 360-degree appraisal as a performance evaluation process that utilizes feedback from various sources an employee interacts with, including supervisors, peers, subordinates, and customers. This provides a more well-rounded view of an employee's performance compared to evaluations from just one source. The benefits listed are improving self-awareness, identifying strengths and areas for development, and improving relationships, productivity, and organizational culture through honest feedback. Potential drawbacks include the possibility of dishonest, conflicting, or intimidating feedback that makes the evaluation complex to analyze.
Similar to Isstm merit rating, promotions & transfers (20)
Performance Appraisal PPT | Learn All about Performance Appraisal
Performance Appraisal PPT | Learn All about Performance Appraisal
Performance Appraisal Dr.Rangappa.S.Ashi Associate Professor SDM Institute of...
Performance Appraisal Dr.Rangappa.S.Ashi Associate Professor SDM Institute of...
More from kongara
K.chaitanya sm
This document discusses diversification strategies that businesses can employ. It describes four primary strategies: concentric diversification, where a business expands into related markets or products; conglomerate diversification, diversifying into unrelated industries; vertical integration, controlling more stages of production; and horizontal diversification, expanding into new businesses at the same production stage. Diversification allows businesses to manage risk if one sector declines and pursue growth in new areas, though managing unrelated businesses brings administrative challenges.
Stakeholder management
The document discusses stakeholder management for a wedding project. It identifies the primary stakeholders as the bride, groom, and their families. Secondary stakeholders include wedding planners, photographers, venues, decorators, caterers, and others involved in the wedding. After classifying stakeholders, managers must monitor relationships, communicate with stakeholders, recognize interdependence, and organize all aspects of the wedding in a timely manner to solve potential conflicts.
K.chaitanya pm
The work breakdown structure (WBS) is a process that divides complex projects into simpler, more manageable tasks. In a WBS, larger tasks are broken down into smaller, more easily supervised and estimated chunks of work. This methodology can be applied to project management in any field. A WBS creates accountability by assigning specific, well-defined tasks to individuals who are then responsible for completion. It also helps to estimate costs, timelines, resource needs, and risks. When constructing a WBS, tasks should generally not be smaller than two weeks or larger than 80 hours of work.
2 e salesforce objectives.pdf (3 files merged)
The document discusses key aspects of sales quotas and objectives for a sales force. It defines quotas as specific sales goals for individuals over a period of time in a given territory. Quotas are used to provide performance targets, standards, control and motivation. When developing quotas, companies consider objectives, customer mix, salesperson performance, product diversity and environmental factors. The document also outlines different types of quotas including sales, expense, profit, activity and combination quotas. It discusses quantitative and qualitative performance measures for evaluating salespeople.
Linear logisticregression
This document provides an overview of linear and logistic regression models. It discusses that linear regression is used for numeric prediction problems while logistic regression is used for classification problems with categorical outputs. It then covers the key aspects of each model, including defining the hypothesis function, cost function, and using gradient descent to minimize the cost function and fit the model parameters. For linear regression, it discusses calculating the regression line to best fit the data. For logistic regression, it discusses modeling the probability of class membership using a sigmoid function and interpreting the odds ratios from the model coefficients.
Adwords introduction (1)
This document provides an overview of Google AdWords, including what paid marketing is, different types of marketing strategies like direct marketing, branding campaigns, and paid ads. It discusses setting up an AdWords account, campaign, ad groups, and keywords. It covers match types for keywords like broad, phrase, exact, and negative matching. Finally, it encourages the reader to set up their own sample AdWords account and campaign for a florist business.
Offpage optimization
A link is a connection between web pages or sites. Quality backlinks can increase a site's authority, page rank, search rankings, and traffic. Link analysis tools like Google Webmaster Tools and Ahrefs help analyze links. Links can be one-way, with one site linking out but no link back, or two-way/reciprocal with sites linking to each other. Multiple sites can share three-way links. DoFollow links pass PageRank while NoFollow links do not. Effective link building focuses on quality over quantity, diversifies link sources, and avoids exact match anchor texts. Methods of link building include guest blogging, forum posting, and social bookmarking.
Basics of search engines and algorithms (1)
The document provides a history and overview of how search engines work. It discusses the evolution of major search engines from the 1990s to present day. It then describes the key components of search engine architecture, including crawling websites, indexing content, ranking algorithms, and providing search results. Specific algorithms like PageRank and updates from Google are explained. The document also covers how search engines determine relevancy, fight spam, and present results on the search engine results page.
Isttm evol, dynamics, trends hrm
This document discusses the evolution of human resource management (HRM) through different eras: the industrial revolution era focused on discipline and job displacement; the trade unionism era emphasized employee grievance systems and benefits; the social responsibility era saw a paternalistic attitude towards employees' welfare; the scientific management era developed principles of job analysis and matching employees' skills to roles; the industrial psychology era researched selection and testing; the behavioral science era recognized motivational theories; and the personnel specialists era managed human resources through training, wages, and relations. It notes factors driving HRM development and dynamics around operational, cultural, and strategic changes. Contemporary Indian HRM trends are shaped by global, professional, and socio-emotional drivers.
Isttm hyd ir v2.0
Industrial Relations management involves understanding human behavior and relationships in the workplace. It has historically involved understanding the attitudes, behaviors, and implicit faith between employers and employees. Over time, as industries developed in India under British rule, the conditions for Indian laborers became extremely exploitative and poor. Modern Industrial Relations systems aim to safeguard worker and management interests, avoid conflicts, and maintain harmonious relationships through sound personnel policies, participative management, and other factors.
Matching entrepreneur
The document provides guidance on identifying business opportunities by collecting information on local resources, industries, demand, and infrastructure. Opportunities are classified based on natural resources, local industries, local demand, and export potential. When deciding on an opportunity, one must consider their own background and capabilities as well as factors like market competition, technology, raw materials, labor, costs, risks, and government policies. A thorough matching of the opportunity and individual is needed.
Marketing channel selection
The STP process is an important marketing concept involving segmentation, targeting, and positioning. Segmentation involves dividing the overall market into groups with similar characteristics. Targeting involves selecting specific market segments to focus on. Positioning is how the product is designed to be perceived in the marketplace against competitors. The goal of STP is to guide development of an appropriate marketing mix.
Market feasibility
This document discusses the importance of conducting market research before launching a new product or service. It outlines several key objectives of market research, including understanding the target market and customers' needs and perspectives. The document then provides guidance on assessing the relevant market, identifying competitors and their offerings, determining the target audience, and understanding what customers want and how they will perceive the new offering. A variety of qualitative and quantitative primary and secondary research methods are described to help gather customer insights and competitive intelligence needed to ensure market feasibility and success.
Innovation & entrepreneurship development program
This document outlines the modules of an entrepreneurship course. Module 1 discusses entrepreneurial competence, including concepts of entrepreneurship and the characteristics of successful entrepreneurs. Module 2 covers the entrepreneurial environment, such as the role of family/society and government policies. Module 3 is about business plan preparation, including selecting a product/service and preparing feasibility reports. Module 4 focuses on launching a small business, including obtaining financing and selecting markets. Module 5 is on managing small businesses, such as monitoring performance and preventing business failures.
Industrial policy
The document discusses the industrial policies and regulations of the Telangana state government in India. It outlines the key aspects of Telangana's new industrial policy, including providing a single application form for all project clearances to be approved within 15 days. It also notes that many districts in Telangana are rich in mineral resources and the policy aims to utilize these resources to create job opportunities and promote economic development in the state.
government industrial policies
The document summarizes key industrial policies and regulations in India over time. It discusses the Telangana state government's new industrial policy and its aims. It then provides an overview of India's central government industrial policy resolutions from 1948 to the present, including objectives, classifications of industries, and other details. Key reforms from the 1991 New Economic Policy and subsequent five-year plans are also summarized.
Current scenario
The document discusses entrepreneurship in India, noting there are ample small business opportunities but support is needed from the government and society. It outlines various government organizations that promote industries and entrepreneurship through training and funding. These include groups at the national, state, and local levels. The document also discusses industry associations that help entrepreneurs and steer policy, as well as development organizations that provide training and support for new businesses. It concludes that increasing entrepreneurship is key to fighting unemployment and poverty in India.
Feasibilitystudy
This document discusses the importance and process of conducting a feasibility study before starting or expanding a business. A feasibility study evaluates the viability of a business idea by assessing potential markets, required resources and costs, and chances of success. It outlines various business scenarios and helps inform the decision of whether to proceed with an idea ("go/no go decision"). Key parts of a feasibility study include defining the project, analyzing market potential and competition, evaluating technical and financial requirements, and assessing managerial capabilities. The results are a major information source for deciding to move forward with a business concept.
Dpr
This document provides a detailed proposal for a term loan and working capital limit to set up a new manufacturing project. It includes sections on the enterprise details, promoters and management, technical aspects of the project, implementation schedule, project costs, means of finance, industry and market analysis, financial viability projections, strengths and weaknesses, securities offered, and a list of enclosures. The overall proposal is to set up a new manufacturing facility for an undisclosed product.
Entrepreneurial competence
This document provides information about an entrepreneurship development program organized by SPARC Consultants Pvt Ltd. The 5 module program aims to motivate students to become dynamic entrepreneurs. It covers topics like entrepreneurial competence, entrepreneurial environment, business plan preparation, launching a small business, and managing a small business. The program will be delivered through lectures, group activities, product presentations and feedback sessions. The schedule provides the topic details across 15 sessions to be delivered on weekends or weekdays. The goal is to benefit students by imparting the experiences of the organizers and expanding their knowledge beyond business schools.
More from kongara (20)
Recently uploaded
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/tacvl9ekroe9hqupdnjruiypvm9rdaneISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"National Information Standards Organization (NISO)
This presentation was provided by Racquel Jemison, Ph.D., Christina MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Paulomi Majumder. Ph.D., all of the American Chemical Society, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Lifelines of National Economy chapter for Class 10 STUDY MATERIAL PDF
The chapter Lifelines of National Economy in Class 10 Geography focuses on the various modes of transportation and communication that play a vital role in the economic development of a country. These lifelines are crucial for the movement of goods, services, and people, thereby connecting different regions and promoting economic activities.
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف أحرف الخلاف للقراء العشرةأعد أحرف الخلاف بالتلوين وصلا سمير بسيوني غفر الله له
Recently uploaded (20)
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Lifelines of National Economy chapter for Class 10 STUDY MATERIAL PDF
Lifelines of National Economy chapter for Class 10 STUDY MATERIAL PDF
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
Isstm merit rating, promotions & transfers
- 1. Dr. Shankar Anappindi shankar.anappindi@gmail.com Merit Rating, Promotions & Transfers
- 2. Dr. Shankar Anappindi shankar.anappindi@gmail.com •a man is compared with all others without considering any specific factorsRanking •the performance of the employees is evaluated against certain grades such as poor, good, very good, excellent or outstanding, satisfactory or unsatisfactoryGrading •performance of an employee is evaluated against certain specific factors. Five degrees or scales are established for each factor and each degree is definedGraphic Scales •certain Key personnel are selected for each factor (which may include initiative, leadership, dependability, safety etc.)Man-to-man comparison •to reduce bias or prejudice of the rater, the merit rating under this method is actually done by the HR Department. The supervisor simply reports the. Performance of the employee by putting ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ against a series of descriptive phrases Check-list •forced to select a statement from a pair of statements though both may be applicable or un applicable to him Forced Choice Description •act or conduct of an employee during crucial or critical circumstances is recorded by the rater Selection of Critical Incidents •Forced to maintain balance as Poor 10%, Outstanding 10% Good 35% & Average 45% Forced Distribution Method Merit Ratings - Methods & Understanding -
- 3. Dr. Shankar Anappindi shankar.anappindi@gmail.com Merit Seniority Seniority cum Merit Suitability Vertical Promotion Up gradation Dry Promotion Paper Promotion Departmental Promotion Division Promotion Cross Division Promotion Need Based Role Based Performance Based Time Based Business / Industry Based Shift Transfers Personnel / Remedial Transfers Versatility Transfers Replacement Transfers Production Transfers Promotions - Types & Basis - Transfers Succession Planning Superannuation Resignation Promotion / Transfer Diversification Creation of New Position
- 4. Dr. Shankar Anappindi shankar.anappindi@gmail.com Purpose of Transfers Organizational Effectiveness Enhance Versatility & Competencies Work Fluctuations / Crisis Management Employee Compatibility / Teamability Correct erroneous placement Relieve monotony Workforce Optimization Means of Punishment Reasons of Transfers Avoid favouritism and nepotism Avoid gaining capacity of influencing and egocentrism Avoid monotony in the work of an employee Makes an employee accountable to his seat Avoid excess dependency on particular employee Create transparency among the employees and their work Limits taking advantage and sole control over the seat or section Avoid unnecessary influence on others for their own advantage Make conversant of different seats work Retain harmonious environment
- 5. Dr. Shankar Anappindi shankar.anappindi@gmail.com Job enhancement is when an employee is given new responsibilities or tasks that give him/her the opportunity to develop his/her skills or abilities. For example, a cashier at a grocery store could be taught how to prepare the weekly work schedule. Job Enlargement means increasing the scope of a job through extending the range of its job duties and responsibilities generally within the same level and periphery. More of HORIZONTAL Job enrichment can be described as a medium through which management can motivate self-driven employees by assigning them additional responsibility normally reserved for higher level employees. By doing this, the employees feel like their work has meaning and is important to the company. More of VERTICAL. Job Enrichment is dependent on Job Enlargement.