An efficient allocation of resources that adequately accounts for natural capital. Traditional economics (including environmental economics - defined as the application of traditional economics to environmental problems) has focused on a third of these problems (efficient allocation) and therefore has not fully addressed the issue of sustainable development.
An efficient allocation of resources that adequately accounts for natural capital. Traditional economics (including environmental economics - defined as the application of traditional economics to environmental problems) has focused on a third of these problems (efficient allocation) and therefore has not fully addressed the issue of sustainable development.
NEP is a policy formulated in 2006 by Ministry of Environment and Forest,Govt. of India for providing certain strategies and standards that ensures environmental safety to surrounding areas,working areas, laboratories or facilities, are free from dangers.
Concept of Sustainable Development: Strategies, opportunities and implementat...PETER NAIBEI
The presentation highlights the concept of Sustainable Development contemporary issues in environmental policy in the global and Kenya context (strategies, opportunities and implementation).
Monitoring is an activity undertaken to provide specific information on the characteristics and functioning of environmental and social variables in space and time. Environmental monitoring compares impacts predicted in environmental impact assessment with those which actually occur during and after implementation, in order to assess whether the impact prediction process performs satisfactorily. In Kenya communities are encouraged take a leading role and responsibility to monitor project activities at all stages to ensure that the measures stipulated in the environmental management plan are adequate to mitigate adverse impacts or are attaining or fulfilling the anticipated benefits from the project
Monitoring is therefore undertaken after the project has begun to check the initial EIA predictions and determine whether further action is needed to abate or avoid pollution or environmental harm. It can also be done for purposes of conducting research or identifying patterns or trends which reflect the state of the environment. It can also be described measurement of the quality of the environment and each of its components, activities or natural and anthropogenic inputs which may affect the quality of the environment and the effects of such activities.
All monitoring strategies and programmes have reasons and justifications. The aim is to actually establish the current state of or trends in certain environmental parameters. In all cases the results of a monitoring process will be reviewed, analyzed statistically and published. The design of a monitoring program must therefore have regard to the final use of the data before monitoring actually starts.
The frequency of monitoring will vary from project to project. This depends on the nature of the project and severity of the environmental impacts.
This presentation shows the taxonomy, classification, management of natural resources based on the second chapter of the book Environmental Economics, edited by Rabindra N. Bhattacharya.
Global environmental problems have surfaced in recent years in the midst of a general upgrading of economic standards in advanced countries. This has been paralleled by rapid growth of poverty, population, and urbanization in less developed countries, and resulted in broadening mutually dependent international relationships. International efforts concerning environmental conservation relate to global warming, protection of the ozone layer, acid deposition, forests, wildlife, marine environment, desertification, and pollution problems in developing countries.
The relationship between the environment and the economy can be depicted by means of the “Material Balance Model” The model was developed by Allen Kneese and R.V Ayres. The model visualizes the total economic process as a physically balanced flow between inputs and outputs.
NEP is a policy formulated in 2006 by Ministry of Environment and Forest,Govt. of India for providing certain strategies and standards that ensures environmental safety to surrounding areas,working areas, laboratories or facilities, are free from dangers.
Concept of Sustainable Development: Strategies, opportunities and implementat...PETER NAIBEI
The presentation highlights the concept of Sustainable Development contemporary issues in environmental policy in the global and Kenya context (strategies, opportunities and implementation).
Monitoring is an activity undertaken to provide specific information on the characteristics and functioning of environmental and social variables in space and time. Environmental monitoring compares impacts predicted in environmental impact assessment with those which actually occur during and after implementation, in order to assess whether the impact prediction process performs satisfactorily. In Kenya communities are encouraged take a leading role and responsibility to monitor project activities at all stages to ensure that the measures stipulated in the environmental management plan are adequate to mitigate adverse impacts or are attaining or fulfilling the anticipated benefits from the project
Monitoring is therefore undertaken after the project has begun to check the initial EIA predictions and determine whether further action is needed to abate or avoid pollution or environmental harm. It can also be done for purposes of conducting research or identifying patterns or trends which reflect the state of the environment. It can also be described measurement of the quality of the environment and each of its components, activities or natural and anthropogenic inputs which may affect the quality of the environment and the effects of such activities.
All monitoring strategies and programmes have reasons and justifications. The aim is to actually establish the current state of or trends in certain environmental parameters. In all cases the results of a monitoring process will be reviewed, analyzed statistically and published. The design of a monitoring program must therefore have regard to the final use of the data before monitoring actually starts.
The frequency of monitoring will vary from project to project. This depends on the nature of the project and severity of the environmental impacts.
This presentation shows the taxonomy, classification, management of natural resources based on the second chapter of the book Environmental Economics, edited by Rabindra N. Bhattacharya.
Global environmental problems have surfaced in recent years in the midst of a general upgrading of economic standards in advanced countries. This has been paralleled by rapid growth of poverty, population, and urbanization in less developed countries, and resulted in broadening mutually dependent international relationships. International efforts concerning environmental conservation relate to global warming, protection of the ozone layer, acid deposition, forests, wildlife, marine environment, desertification, and pollution problems in developing countries.
The relationship between the environment and the economy can be depicted by means of the “Material Balance Model” The model was developed by Allen Kneese and R.V Ayres. The model visualizes the total economic process as a physically balanced flow between inputs and outputs.
Healthy People = Healthy Planet: Texas VersionWendy Ring
This presentation explains how fossil fuel based systems of power generation, transportation and food are driving our epidemic of chronic disease and why climate policy will make a difference.
A presentation made at the 2015 NC BREATHE Conference by Jason West, PhD of University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill. Sponsored by Clean Air Carolina and partners, the 2015 NC BREATHE Conference was held on March 27, 2015 in Raleigh, NC to bring together air quality researchers, medical and public health professionals, and policymakers to share the latest research on the health impacts of air pollution, the positive health outcomes related to clean air policy-making, and the resulting economic benefits.
It related to pollution and causes and effects of it on society and community. It includes all types of pollutions and also the diagnositic or the prevetive measures . It includes Modifying a production process to produce less waste. Using non-toxic or less toxic chemicals as cleaners, degreasers and other maintenance chemicals. Implementing water and energy conservation practices. Reusing materials such as drums and pallets rather than disposing of them as waste.
Comments on the Intersection of Architecture and MicrobiologyWilliam Bahnfleth
Presentation on the value of collaboration between biologists and building scientists to study and improve indoor environments. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Inaugural Conference on the Microbiology of the Built Environment, Boulder CO, May 31 - June 1, 2012.
A national study on long-term exposure to air pollution to human health and correlation to COVID-19 mortality - pollution kills and every 1ug/m3 PM 2.5 increases the death rate from COVID by 15%.
Air Pollution, Asthma, Triggers & Health - Research and Remediation StrategiesSean McCormick
This content was created to help provide health care practitioners with more detailed information about air pollution, it's impact on health, and low-no-cost strategies for reducing exposure to asthma triggers.
Pecha Kucha format presentation about innovative tools being developed by the GEF-UNEP Flood and Drought Management Tools project, by Raul Glotzbach in the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference.
Pecha Kucha format presentation about innovative solutions being deployed by the Caribbean Wastewater Project (Revolving Fund) GEF-IADB/UNEP, by Alfredo Coelloin the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference.
Large Marine Ecosystems: Megaregional Best Practices for LME Assessment and M...Iwl Pcu
Workshop convened at GEF – IWC8
Negombo, Sri Lanka
May 9, 2016
Kenneth Sherman, NOAA
LME Program
Andrew Hudson, UNDP
Water and Ocean Governance Programme
Slides used during the science to communication workshop in the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference, to explain how to understand and communicate with an audience better when presenting.
Presentation by Chris O'Brien, of the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (Bay of Bengal LME project) during the science to communication workshop in the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference. The presentations focuses on how to create effective powerpoint slides.
How to communicate science effectively (IWC8 Presentation)Iwl Pcu
Presentation by Professor Sevvandi Jajakody, of the Wayamba University(Bay of Bengal LME project) during the science to communication workshop in the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference.
Presentation by Chris O'Brien, of the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (Bay of Bengal LME project) during the science to communication workshop in the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference.
Presentation by Peter Whalley, International Nitrogen Management System GEF- UNEP project providing an introduction to the nitrogen roundtable at the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters conference
Presentation by Hugh Walton of the GEF-UNDP Pacific Fisheries project 4746 at the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference.
GEF Pillar 1.2 Promoting Transformational Change in Major Global Industries
Hugh Walton – Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
Background - The FFA region
GEF OFMP – 2001 – 2004 & 2005 – 2011
Evaluation in the context of transformational change
OFMP 2 – 2015 – 2019 – Setting the stage for institutional change
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
Introduction to the Economics of Pollution Control: Health Issues
1. GEF
Session 9A
Introduction to the Economics of
Pollution Control: Health Issues
John A. Dixon
johnkailua@aol.com
Ashgabad, November, 2005
Adapted from materials prepared by Maureen Cropper
The World Bank
2. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
What Questions Can Economic
Valuation/BCA Help Answer?
How stringent should environmental standards be for
Air quality?
Surface water quality?
Drinking water quality?
What about POPs?
Any other pollutant?
3. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
Benefits and Costs of Pollution
Control
Four categories of benefits could be examined:
Human health (the focus here)
Visibility (amenity values)
Ecological Effects (and ecosystem
services)
Agricultural Benefits (change in
production)
4. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
Valuing Environmental Health Effects
Damage Function Approach
Value of number of cases of illness/death avoided =
Number of Cases Avoided * Value per Case
Value per Case Avoided should reflect individual’s
willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid illness or risk of
death
Human Capital/Cost of Illness Approach, which
focuses on lost productivity, medical costs, generally
serves as a lower bound to WTP
5. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
The numbers can be large! For example, in
2010 the Monetized Benefits from the US
Clean Air Act are estimated as follows:
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Agriculture
Visibility
Productivity
Other Morbidity
Chronic Bronchitis
Mortality
Cost
Billions of 1990 US$
6. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
Steps in Calculating Health Benefits for
Air or Water Quality Improvements
Predict change in emissions of criteria pollutants associated
with air/ water quality regulations
Translate changes in emissions into population-weighted
changes in ambient exposures
Calculate associated changes in health outcomes
Reduced premature mortality
Reduced hospital admissions
Fewer cases of chronic bronchitis or diarrhea
Assign a dollar value to cases of illness, mortality avoided
7. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
Air Pollution Example:
Studies of the Health Impacts
Examine effects of acute air pollution exposure on
Premature death
Hospital admissions for heart, lung disease
Emergency room visits for heart, lung disease
Work-loss days
Examine effects of chronic exposure on
Premature death
Chronic bronchitis
8. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
Interpretation of Dose-Response
Function (or DRR)
Dose-response function relates health effects to air
pollution concentrations and other factors affecting health
Slope of dose-response function measures the percentage
change in the health outcome for a one unit change in
PM10
For example, a 10 microgram reduction in PM10 reduces
deaths by about 4% in studies of the impact of long-term
exposure to air pollution on deaths
9. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
Projected Reductions in Illness due to the US
Clean Air Act, Titles I - V
Health Endpoint Pollutant 2010 Mean reduction
Mortality
Age 30+ PM et al 23,000
Chronic Illness
Chronic bronchitis
Chronic asthma
PM
Ozone
20,000
7,200
Hospitalization
Respiratory admissions
Cardiovascular admissions
Asthma-related emergency room visits
PM, CO, NO2, SO2, Ozone
PM, CO, NO2, SO2, Ozone
PM, Ozone
22,000
42,000
4,800
Minor Illness
Avoided respiratory illnesses and
symptom-days, asthma attacks, work
loss days, etc.
PM, NO2, SO2, Ozone Millions of cases/incidence
10. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
Valuing Environmental Health Effects
The Damage Function Approach:
Value of number of cases of illness/death avoided = Number of Cases
Avoided * Value per Case
Value per Case Avoided should reflect individual’s willingness to
pay (WTP) to avoid illness or risk of death
Human Capital/Cost of Illness Approach, which focuses on lost
productivity, medical costs, generally serves as a lower bound to
WTP
11. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
Valuing Risks to Life: What Is to Be
Valued?
Epidemiologic studies predict number of deaths
avoided
Treat these as equivalent to reducing risk of death
for each person in the exposed population
Risk reduction per person =
(Number of deaths avoided)/(Size of exposed
population)
12. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
Key Concepts
Concept of a Statistical Life
Reducing risk of death by 1 in 10,000 for each
of 10,000 people saves one statistical life
Value of a Statistical Life (VSL)
If each of the 10,000 people is willing to pay
$500 for the 1 in 10,000 risk reduction
the Value of a Statistical Life is = 10,000 x
$500 = $5,000,000
13. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
How to Measure WTP for a
Reduction in Risk of Death?
Labor Market Studies
Use compensating wage differentials to value risks
of death
Contingent Valuation Studies
Ask people directly what they would pay for a
change in risk of death
Averting Behavior Studies
Use data on seatbelt use, purchase of smoke detectors,
switch to low-tar cigarettes
14. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
Empirical Estimates of Value of a
Statistical Life (VSL) in the US
Value of Statistical Life estimates range between $ 1 - 10
million (1990 USD); USEPA’s preferred estimate is $4.8M
(1990 USD)
Problems:
Average age of worker is 40—older than average age
of person whose life is extended by an environmental
program
Estimates of VSL from Averting Behavior Studies
almost one order of magnitude lower than in Labor
Market Studies
15. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
Valuing Reductions in Morbidity (sickness)
Private WTP for a reduction in risk of illness should
reflect:
Value of lost work time
Value of lost leisure time
Value of expenditures to treat illness
Value of expenditures to avoid illness
Discomfort (pain) of illness
Value to Society of the Risk Reduction = Individual’s WTP
plus reduction in costs borne by society
Cost of Illness = Value of lost work time + Value of medical
expenditures
16. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
Approaches to Valuing Morbidity
Ask directly WTP to avoid illness or risk of
illness
Look at rate of substitution of one risk for
another (Risk-Risk Tradeoffs)
Use Cost of Illness estimates as a lower
bound to WTP
17. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
Health Effects in the US:
Valuation per health outcome (1990 $)
Endpoint Pollutant Valuation (mean est.)
Mortality PM10 4,800,000 Per case
Chronic Bronchitis PM10 260,000 Per case
Chronic Asthma O3 25,000 Per case
Hospital Admissions
All Respiratory SO2, NO2, PM10,O3 6,900 Per case
All Cardiovascular SO2, NO2, CO, PM10,O3 9,500 Per case
Emergency Room Visits for Asthma PM10,O3 194 Per case
Respiratory Illness and Symptoms
Acute Bronchitis PM10 45 Per case
Asthma Attack or Moderate or Worse Asthma Day PM10,O3 32 Per case
Acute Respiratory Symptoms SO2, NO2, PM10,O3 18 Per case
Upper Respiratory Symptoms PM10 19 Per case
Lower Respiratory Symptoms PM10 12 Per case
Shortness of Breath, Chest Tightness, or Wheeze PM10, SO2 5.3 Per day
Work Loss Days PM10 83 Per day
Mild Restricted Activity Days PM10,O3 38 Per day
18. Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI John A. Dixon, Econom
GEF
Valuing Morbidity and Mortality in
the Caspian region
Persian Gulf Environmental Damages (air pollution
from burning oil wells)
VSL calculations from Iran
Other examples
And don’t forget the other types of values:
Amenities
Ecosystem effects
Agricultural/ fisheries production