The document discusses several models that examine the relationship between individual differences and language learning. It summarizes models that view individual variables as independent factors affecting learning outcomes, as well as models that see the variables as interdependent. The models covered include the Good Language Learner model, Monitor Theory model, Brown and Fraser's framework, Levin's schematic model, Gardner's educational model, Skehan's model of influences, and Spolsky's model of second language learning. The document also lists several individual difference factors that may affect Computer-Assisted Language Learning outcomes.
A lecture about Individual Differences in SLA & SLL (Motivation & Attitude) B...Mohammed Mallah
second language learning and language teaching (vivian cook) Ch 8
brief presentation about motivation and attitude and their role in second language learning
La Psicologia y aprendizaje de las Lenguas es un vocabulario, fonología, gramática, y otros aspectos de la estructura lingüística.
Al hacer uso de la palabra (o no), ¿qué decir a quién y cómo decirlo adecuadamente en cualquier situación dada.
El conocimiento social y cultural que permite a los oradores a usar e interpretar las formas lingüísticas.
A lecture about Individual Differences in SLA & SLL (Motivation & Attitude) B...Mohammed Mallah
second language learning and language teaching (vivian cook) Ch 8
brief presentation about motivation and attitude and their role in second language learning
La Psicologia y aprendizaje de las Lenguas es un vocabulario, fonología, gramática, y otros aspectos de la estructura lingüística.
Al hacer uso de la palabra (o no), ¿qué decir a quién y cómo decirlo adecuadamente en cualquier situación dada.
El conocimiento social y cultural que permite a los oradores a usar e interpretar las formas lingüísticas.
Major distinctions:
Difference between first and second language
Difference between acquisition and learning
Difference between explicit and implicit learning
Difference between second and foreign language
Spolsky's Model of Language Learning
MODELING SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS’ INTERLANGUAGE AND ITS VARIABILITYsylviethouesny
A dynamic assessment approach to distinguishing between errors and mistakes
Slides presented at the Department of Theoretical Computational Linguistics in Tübingen, Germany - 14 Oct 2011
More: http://blog.icall-research.net/2011/10/17/presentation-in-tubingen-october-2011/
Major distinctions:
Difference between first and second language
Difference between acquisition and learning
Difference between explicit and implicit learning
Difference between second and foreign language
Spolsky's Model of Language Learning
MODELING SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS’ INTERLANGUAGE AND ITS VARIABILITYsylviethouesny
A dynamic assessment approach to distinguishing between errors and mistakes
Slides presented at the Department of Theoretical Computational Linguistics in Tübingen, Germany - 14 Oct 2011
More: http://blog.icall-research.net/2011/10/17/presentation-in-tubingen-october-2011/
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
Individual Differences & CALL
1. INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES and CALL
By Group 3:
ü Zulkifli
ü Eka Margianti S
ü Miftahuljannah Saleh
ü Qori Aturrahmah
ü Dhony
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 1
2. BACKGROUND
Objective : Investigating what factors on learners/students
that may affect the Computer-Assisted Language Learning
(CALL).
The factors have been studied on the basis of learner
variables which are assumed to be affecting the language
learning process. And further study observed which
individual variables which should be considered most
relevant in affecting language learning outcomes
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 2
3. PREVIOUS STUDIES ON RELATION BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL
DIFFERENCES & LANGUAGE LEARNING
Two types of models of SLA to individual
outcomes:
1. Models with independent learner
variables
2. Models with interdependent learner
variables
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 3
4. Models with independent learner variables
Distinguishing between individual-related
variables and other variables
These models include:
1. The ‘Good Language-Learner’ model
2. Monitor Theory model
3. Brown and Fraser’s framework
4. Levin’s schematic model.
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 4
5. Models with interdependent learner variables
Assuming interrelationship between
individual variables
These models include:
1. Gardner’s educational model
2. Skehan’s model of influences on language
learning
3. Spolsky’s model of second language
learning
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 5
6. The ‘Good Language-Learner’ Model
Consists of:
1. Three independent variables: Learner, Teaching,
Context
2. Two dependent variables: Learning, Outcome
Theory:
“There is a direct link between each of the three
‘global’ independent variables and the learning
variables.”
Weakness:
How the independent variables and which particular
sub-variables affect the learning variable remain
unclear.
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 6
7. The ‘Good Language-Learner’ Model
TEACHING
Materials
Syllabus
Methodology
Resources
OUTCOME
THE LEARNERS LEARNING
Proficiency
Age Unconscious processes -Listening
Intelligence -Generalization - Speaking
Aptitude -Transfer - Reading
Motivation -Simplification - Writing
Attitude Conscious processes Errors
Personality - strategies Inter language
Cognitive Style Affective reason
THE CONTEXT
EFL/ESL
Opportunities for use
Social Milieu
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 7
8. Monitor Theory Model (Krashen, 1978)
O
I
U
N
Affective Cognitive T
P MONITOR
Filter Organizer P
U
U
T
T
Attitude
Affective
Motivation
Filter
Self Confidence
NOTE:
Affective filter may cause the quality of acquisition
(output) to be higher or lower.
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 8
9. Monitor Theory Model (Krashen, 1978)
Variables :
Affective filter (learner variable), input, cognitive
organisers, and output.
Theory:
“Affective filter, being a major source of variation, may
cause the quality of acquisition (output) to be higher or
lower.”
Weakness:
How learner variables affect the learning outcomes
remains unclear.
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 9
10. Brown & Fraser’s (1979) Framework
Situation
Scene Participants
Setting Purpose Individuals Relationship
(bystanders, (buying, lecturing, Between
local, time) playing a game) Individuals
(shared
knowledge
power)
Individual Individual as
Qua individual member of a
(personality, social category
attitude) (class, ethnicity)
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 10
11. Brown & Fraser’s (1979) Framework
Variables: Scene, Participant, Language
Choices
This theory examines how individual
situational (consists of Scene and Participant)
variables affect language choices.
Weakness:
There is no clear concept of how factors within
this framework interrelate and affect language
use (production).
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 11
12. Levin’s (1977) Schematic Model
Variables: Input (learner variables) & Output
Theory focuses on describing individual differences in
output, wherein input variables refer to those that
differentiate learners in terms of traits, abilities, and
prerequisites that are related to successful output-task
performance.
Weakness:
It is unclear which input variables that lead to learners’
variation in output or how the different variables influence
one another.
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 12
13. Gardner’s (1979, 1985) Educational Model
Social Individual Outcomes
Differences
Contexts
Milieu
Intelligence Formal Linguistic
C
U
Language
L training
T Language
U
R
Aptitude
A
L
B Motivation
E
Non-Linguistic
L
I
Informal
E Language
F
S Situational Experience
Anxiety
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 13
14. Gardner’s (1979, 1985) Educational Model
Variables:
social mile (cultural beliefs), individual
differences, Second language acquisition
contexts, and Outcomes.
These models highlight the interrelationship
between variables (social, individual, and
context variables) in influencing language
learning outcomes.
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 14
15. Skehan’s (1986, 1989) model of influences
on language learning
Improvement from Naiman’s ‘Good
Language-Learner’ model, however
Sekhan highlights the importance of a
joined-variables effect on language
learning.
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 15
16. Skehan’s (1986, 1989) model of
influences on language learning
The Learner
Classrooms and
materials
Materials Opportunities
Learning Outcome
Syllabus for TL use
Methodology
resources
Social Context
Expectation of bilingualism
Relationship to target
language community
Attitude to target language
Social Class
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 16
17. Skehan’s (1986, 1989) model of
influences on language learning
Variables:
Classroom and materials, Social Context,
Opportunities for target language use, The
Learner, Learning, and Outcomes.
Weakness:
This model does not clearly identify the role of
individual learner related variables and how they
relate to other variables.
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 17
18. Spolsky’s (1989) Model of Second Language Learning
Variables: Social context, condition of learner, learning opportunities.
This model examines individual differences resulting from 74 restricted
conditions.
His model is based on 5 features:
• All aspects of second or foreign language learning were combined in a
single theory.
• Restricted to the specific domain of second language learning and focused
on individual differences.
• Eclecticism, in which a model of second or foreign language learning should
be “open” to different conditions instead of being limited to a particular
pattern or set of condition.
• Recognising “social context” as an important domain which affects learning
outcomes.
Two main clusters in Spolsky’s model:
1. Conditions of social context, i.e. conditions which influence learning in two
ways.
2. Conditions of learners
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 18
19. Spolsky’s (1989) Model of Second Language Learning
Social context
Motivation
Age Personality Capability
Previous Knowledge
Learning Opportunities
(formal or informal)
Linguistic and non
linguistic outcomes for
Free Powerpoint the learners
Templates Page 19
20. INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
• Age
• Attitudes
• Motivation
• Intelligence
• Language aptitude
• Previous knowledge
• Familiarity with computers
• Interaction with native-speakers of English
• Language used for interaction with the
community
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 20