We are interested in the effect of Gauss-Bonnet gravity
and will study these objects in the minimal number of
dimensions in which the term does not become a total
derivative.
Higher dimensions appear in attempts to find a quantum
description of gravity as well as in unified models.
For black holes many of their properties in (3 + 1)
dimensions do not extend to higher dimensions.
We are interested in the effect of Gauss-Bonnet gravity
and will study these objects in the minimal number of
dimensions in which the term does not become a total
derivative.
Higher dimensions appear in attempts to find a quantum
description of gravity as well as in unified models.
For black holes many of their properties in (3 + 1)
dimensions do not extend to higher dimensions.
"The Metropolis adjusted Langevin Algorithm
for log-concave probability measures in high
dimensions", talk by Andreas Elberle at the BigMC seminar, 9th June 2011, Paris
Gauss–Bonnet Boson Stars in AdS - Ibericos, Portugal, 2014Jurgen Riedel
Describe the model to construct non-rotating
Gauss-Bonnet boson stars in AdS
Describe effect of Gauss-Bonnet term to boson star
solutions
Stability analysis of rotating Gauss-Bonnet boson star
solutions (ignoring the Gauss-Bonnet coupling for now)
QMC algorithms usually rely on a choice of “N” evenly distributed integration nodes in $[0,1)^d$. A common means to assess such an equidistributional property for a point set or sequence is the so-called discrepancy function, which compares the actual number of points to the expected number of points (assuming uniform distribution on $[0,1)^{d}$) that lie within an arbitrary axis parallel rectangle anchored at the origin. The dependence of the integration error using QMC rules on various norms of the discrepancy function is made precise within the well-known Koksma--Hlawka inequality and its variations. In many cases, such as $L^{p}$ spaces, $1<p<\infty$, the best growth rate in terms of the number of points “N” as well as corresponding explicit constructions are known. In the classical setting $p=\infty$ sharp results are absent for $d\geq3$ already and appear to be intriguingly hard to obtain. This talk shall serve as a survey on discrepancy theory with a special emphasis on the $L^{\infty}$ setting. Furthermore, it highlights the evolution of recent techniques and presents the latest results.
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Scienceinventy
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is published by the group of young academic and industrial researchers with 12 Issues per year. It is an online as well as print version open access journal that provides rapid publication (monthly) of articles in all areas of the subject such as: civil, mechanical, chemical, electronic and computer engineering as well as production and information technology. The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence. Papers will be published by rapid process within 20 days after acceptance and peer review process takes only 7 days. All articles published in Research Inventy will be peer-reviewed.
Y.B.Jun et al. [9] introduced the notion of Cubic sets and Cubic subgroups. In this paper we introduced the
notion of cubic BF- Algebra i.e., an interval-valued BF-Algebra and an anti fuzzy BF-Algebra. Intersection of two cubic
BF- Algebras is again a cubic BF-Algebra is also studied.
On Some Notable Properties of Zero Divisors in the Ring of Integers Modulo m ...inventionjournals
The algebraic structure (m , +, ×) is a commutative ring with unity. When we examine the multiplicative structure (m , ×) we noticed that the product of some two non-zero elements is zero, thus the ring (m , +, ×) has zero divisors. In this study, we made some observations on some of the theorems regarding the zero divisors of the ring (m , +, ×).We established some of the properties of the zero divisors of (m , +, ×) . Our results showed that, For an even integer m 6 at least one of the quadratic residues modulo m in (m , +, ×) is a zero divisor also for an odd composite non-perfect square m 15 at least three of the quadratic residues are zero divisors. Furthermore, we have found that if m is composite and can be written as a power of prime p, that is m = p α where α ≥ 2 then: 1. Zero divisors in m are multiples of prime p. 2. Let D denote the set of zero divisors in (m , +, ×) and D D { 0 } , then (a) (D+ , +) is a cyclic group generated by p (b) (D+ , +, ×) is a cyclic ring (c) (D+ , +, ×) is a subring of (m , +, ×) (d) (D+ , +, ×) is an ideal of (m , +, ×) (e) (D+ , +, ×) is a principal ideal (f) (D+ , +, ×) is a prime ideal (g) (D+ , +, ×) is a maximal ideal.(h) (m , +, ×) is a local ring.
"The Metropolis adjusted Langevin Algorithm
for log-concave probability measures in high
dimensions", talk by Andreas Elberle at the BigMC seminar, 9th June 2011, Paris
Gauss–Bonnet Boson Stars in AdS - Ibericos, Portugal, 2014Jurgen Riedel
Describe the model to construct non-rotating
Gauss-Bonnet boson stars in AdS
Describe effect of Gauss-Bonnet term to boson star
solutions
Stability analysis of rotating Gauss-Bonnet boson star
solutions (ignoring the Gauss-Bonnet coupling for now)
QMC algorithms usually rely on a choice of “N” evenly distributed integration nodes in $[0,1)^d$. A common means to assess such an equidistributional property for a point set or sequence is the so-called discrepancy function, which compares the actual number of points to the expected number of points (assuming uniform distribution on $[0,1)^{d}$) that lie within an arbitrary axis parallel rectangle anchored at the origin. The dependence of the integration error using QMC rules on various norms of the discrepancy function is made precise within the well-known Koksma--Hlawka inequality and its variations. In many cases, such as $L^{p}$ spaces, $1<p<\infty$, the best growth rate in terms of the number of points “N” as well as corresponding explicit constructions are known. In the classical setting $p=\infty$ sharp results are absent for $d\geq3$ already and appear to be intriguingly hard to obtain. This talk shall serve as a survey on discrepancy theory with a special emphasis on the $L^{\infty}$ setting. Furthermore, it highlights the evolution of recent techniques and presents the latest results.
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Scienceinventy
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is published by the group of young academic and industrial researchers with 12 Issues per year. It is an online as well as print version open access journal that provides rapid publication (monthly) of articles in all areas of the subject such as: civil, mechanical, chemical, electronic and computer engineering as well as production and information technology. The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence. Papers will be published by rapid process within 20 days after acceptance and peer review process takes only 7 days. All articles published in Research Inventy will be peer-reviewed.
Y.B.Jun et al. [9] introduced the notion of Cubic sets and Cubic subgroups. In this paper we introduced the
notion of cubic BF- Algebra i.e., an interval-valued BF-Algebra and an anti fuzzy BF-Algebra. Intersection of two cubic
BF- Algebras is again a cubic BF-Algebra is also studied.
On Some Notable Properties of Zero Divisors in the Ring of Integers Modulo m ...inventionjournals
The algebraic structure (m , +, ×) is a commutative ring with unity. When we examine the multiplicative structure (m , ×) we noticed that the product of some two non-zero elements is zero, thus the ring (m , +, ×) has zero divisors. In this study, we made some observations on some of the theorems regarding the zero divisors of the ring (m , +, ×).We established some of the properties of the zero divisors of (m , +, ×) . Our results showed that, For an even integer m 6 at least one of the quadratic residues modulo m in (m , +, ×) is a zero divisor also for an odd composite non-perfect square m 15 at least three of the quadratic residues are zero divisors. Furthermore, we have found that if m is composite and can be written as a power of prime p, that is m = p α where α ≥ 2 then: 1. Zero divisors in m are multiples of prime p. 2. Let D denote the set of zero divisors in (m , +, ×) and D D { 0 } , then (a) (D+ , +) is a cyclic group generated by p (b) (D+ , +, ×) is a cyclic ring (c) (D+ , +, ×) is a subring of (m , +, ×) (d) (D+ , +, ×) is an ideal of (m , +, ×) (e) (D+ , +, ×) is a principal ideal (f) (D+ , +, ×) is a prime ideal (g) (D+ , +, ×) is a maximal ideal.(h) (m , +, ×) is a local ring.
The Higgs boson is the last “missing piece” of the Standard Model and the 5th member of the boson family (but not a force carrier).
The Higgs is a hypothetical particle that gives mass to all other particles that normally have mass.
The Higgs particle creates a Higgs field that permeates spacetime.
The Higgs particle and its corresponding field are critical to the understanding and validation of the SM, since the Higgs is deemed responsible for giving particles their mass.
The elusive Higgs is so central to the SM and the theory on which the whole understanding of matter is based, if the Higgs does not exist (is not detected), we will not be able to explain the origin of mass.
Numerous people chat quietly in a fairly crowded room.
Rajnikanth enters the room causing a disturbance in the field.
Followers cluster and surround Rajnikanth as this group of people forms a “massive object”.
This is the presentation about The God Particle. In this ppt you will be able to get the basic information about the Higgs Boson, the experiment carried out in CERN, the result of that experiment and the motive of that experiment.
so do have a look!
Brief introduction to general concepts of Q-balls and Boson
Stars
non-topological Solitons
Properties of Q-balls and Boson Stars
Model to construct Gauss-Bonnet Boson Stars in
asymptotically AdS space-time (aAdS)
Numerical results of Gauss-Bonnet Boson Stars
Stability aspects of Gauss-Bonnet Boson Stars
Classical or absolute Stability
Ergoregions and Superradiant Instability
Simple toy models for a wide range of objects such as
particles, compact stars, e.g. neutron stars and even
centres of galaxies
Gauss-Bonnet gravity: its spectrum does not include
new propagating degrees of freedom besides
gravitation
Toy models for AdS/CFT correspondence. Planar boson
stars in AdS have been interpreted as Bose-Einstein
condensates of glueballs
IIT JAM MATH 2021 Question Paper | Sourav Sir's ClassesSOURAV DAS
IIT JAM Math Previous Year Question Paper
IIT JAM Math 2021 Question Paper
IIT JAM Preparation Strategy
For any query about exams feel free to contact us
Call - 9836793076
1. Motivation: why do we need low-rank tensors
2. Tensors of the second order (matrices)
3. CP, Tucker and tensor train tensor formats
4. Many classical kernels have (or can be approximated in ) low-rank tensor format
5. Post processing: Computation of mean, variance, level sets, frequency
This is the entrance exam paper for ISI MSQE Entrance Exam for the year 2010. Much more information on the ISI MSQE Entrance Exam and ISI MSQE Entrance preparation help available on http://crackdse.com
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
Nucleophilic Addition of carbonyl compounds.pptxSSR02
Nucleophilic addition is the most important reaction of carbonyls. Not just aldehydes and ketones, but also carboxylic acid derivatives in general.
Carbonyls undergo addition reactions with a large range of nucleophiles.
Comparing the relative basicity of the nucleophile and the product is extremely helpful in determining how reversible the addition reaction is. Reactions with Grignards and hydrides are irreversible. Reactions with weak bases like halides and carboxylates generally don’t happen.
Electronic effects (inductive effects, electron donation) have a large impact on reactivity.
Large groups adjacent to the carbonyl will slow the rate of reaction.
Neutral nucleophiles can also add to carbonyls, although their additions are generally slower and more reversible. Acid catalysis is sometimes employed to increase the rate of addition.
This presentation explores a brief idea about the structural and functional attributes of nucleotides, the structure and function of genetic materials along with the impact of UV rays and pH upon them.
Nucleic Acid-its structural and functional complexity.
Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
1. Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in
(d + 1) dimensions
Jürgen Riedel
in collaboration with Betti Hartmann
Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 044003 [arXiv:1210.0096 [hep-th]]
School of Engineering and Science
Jacobs University Bremen, Germany
Models of Gravity
8TH IBERICOS MEETING
Granada, April 26th 2013
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
2. Agenda
Q-balls and boson star soliton solutions
Set up model to support boson star solutions as well
as Q-ball solutions as limit without back reaction
Study solutions with gauge-mediated SUSY potential in
d + 1 dimensions
Possible candidates for dark matter in the early universe
Investigate stability conditions of solutions
Understand difference to standard Φ6-potential ansatz
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
3. Solitons in non-linear field theories
General properties of soliton solutions
localized, finite energy, stable, regular solutions of
non-linear equations
can be viewed as models of elementary particles
Examples
Topological solitons: Skyrme model of hadrons in high
energy physics one of first models and magnetic
monopoles, domain walls etc.
Non-topological solitons: Q-balls (flat space-time) and
boson stars (generalisation in curved space-time)
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
4. Non-topolocial solitons
Properties of topological solitons
Solutions possess the same boundary conditions at
infinity as the physical vacuum state
Degenerate vacuum states do not necessarily exist
Require an additive conservation law, e.g. gauge
invariance under an arbitrary global phase
transformation
S. R. Coleman, Nucl. Phys. B 262 (1985), 263, R. Friedberg, T. D. Lee and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 2739),
D. J. Kaup, Phys. Rev. 172 (1968), 1331, R. Friedberg, T. D. Lee and Y. Pang, Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987), 3658, P.
Jetzer, Phys. Rept. 220 (1992), 163, F. E. Schunck and E. Mielke, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003) R31, F. E.
Schunck and E. Mielke, Phys. Lett. A 249 (1998), 389.
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
5. Model for Q-balls and boson stars in d + 1 dimensions
Action
S =
√
−gdd+1x R−2Λ
16πGd+1
+ Lm + 1
8πGd+1
dd x
√
−hK
negative cosmological constant Λ = −d(d − 1)/(2 2)
Matter Lagrangian
Lm = −∂MΦ∂MΦ∗ − U(|Φ|) , M = 0, 1, ...., d
Gauge mediated potential
USUSY(|Φ|) =
m2|Φ|2 if |Φ| ≤ ηsusy
m2η2
susy = const. if |Φ| > ηsusy
(1)
USUSY(|Φ|) = m2
η2
susy 1 − exp −
|Φ|2
η2
susy
(2)
A. Kusenko, Phys. Lett. B 404 (1997), 285; Phys. Lett. B 405 (1997), 108, L. Campanelli and M. Ruggieri,
Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008), 043504
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
6. Model for Q-balls and boson stars in d + 1 dimensions
Einstein-Klein-Gordon Equations are a coupled ODE
GMN + ΛgMN = 8πGd+1TMN M, N = 0, 1, .., d; (3)
−
∂U
∂|Φ|2
Φ = 0 (4)
Energy-momentum tensor
TMN = gMNL − 2
∂L
∂gMN
(5)
Locally conserved Noether current jM
and globally
conserved Noether charge Q
jM
= −
i
2
Φ∗
∂M
Φ − Φ∂M
Φ∗
jM
;M = 0; Q = − dd
x
√
−gj0
(6)
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
7. Ansatz Q-balls and boson stars for d + 1 dimensions
Metric in spherical Schwarzschild-like coordinates
ds2
= −A2
(r)N(r)dt2
+
1
N(r)
dr2
+ r2
dΩ2
d−1, (7)
where
N(r) = 1 −
2n(r)
rd−2
−
2Λ
(d − 1)d
r2
(8)
Stationary Ansatz for complex scalar field
Φ(t, r) = eiωt
φ(r) (9)
Rescaling using dimensionless quantities
r →
r
m
, ω → mω, → /m, φ → ηsusyφ, n → n/md−2
(10)
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
8. Einstein equations in (d + 1) dimensions
Equations for the metric functions:
n = κ
rd−1
2
Nφ 2
+ U(φ) +
ω2φ2
A2N
, (11)
A = κr Aφ 2
+
ω2φ2
AN2
, (12)
κ = 8πGd+1η2
susy = 8π
η2
susy
Md−1
pl,d+1
(13)
Matter field equation:
rd−1
ANφ = rd−1
A
1
2
∂U
∂φ
−
ω2φ
NA2
. (14)
Appropriate boundary conditions:
φ (0) = 0 , n(0) = 0 , A(∞) = 1
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
9. Expressions for Charge Q and Mass M
The explicit expression for the Noether charge
Q =
2πd/2
Γ(d/2)
∞
0
dr rd−1
ω
φ2
AN
(15)
Mass for κ = 0
M =
2πd/2
Γ(d/2)
∞
0
dr rd−1
Nφ 2
+
ω2φ2
N
+ U(φ) (16)
Mass for κ > 0
n(r 1) = M + n1r2∆+d
+ .... (17)
Y. Brihaye and B. Hartmann, Nonlinearity 21 (2008), 1937, D. Astefanesei and E. Radu, Phys. Lett. B 587
(2004) 7, D. Astefanesei and E. Radu, Nucl. Phys. B 665 (2003) 594 [gr-qc/0309131].
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
10. Existence conditions for solutions
φ
V(φ)
−4 −2 0 2 4
−0.02−0.010.000.010.02
ω = 1.2
V = 0.0
φ
V
−5 0 5
−0.050.050.150.25
ω
= 0.02
= 0.05
= 0.7
= 0.9
= 1.2
Figure : Effective potential V(φ) = ω2φ2 − U(|Φ|).
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
11. Existence conditions for solutions
Condition 1:
V (0) < 0; Φ ≡ 0 local maximum ⇒ ω2 < ω2
max ≡ 1
2 U (0)
Condition 2:
ω2 > ω2
min ≡ minφ[2U(φ)/φ2] minimum over all φ
Consequences:
Restricted interval ω2
min < ω2 < ω2
max ;
U (0) > minφ[2U(φ)/φ2]
Q-balls are rotating in inner space with ω stabilized by
having a lower energy to charge ratio as the free
particles
For USUSY: ω2
max = 1 and ω2
min = 0
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
12. Q-balls in Minkowski background κ = 0 and Λ = 0
ω
Q
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
1e+001e+021e+041e+06
d
= 2
= 3
= 4
= 5
= 6
ω= 1.0
r
φ(r)
0 50 100 150 200
0.00.20.40.60.81.0
Profile
= Q min
= Q max at omega min
= Q max at omega max
Figure : Charge Q in dependence on the frequency omega for different values of d
φ(r >> 1) ∼
1
r
d−1
2
exp − 1 − ω2r + ... (18)
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
13. Q-balls in Minkowski background
Q
M
1e+00 1e+02 1e+04 1e+06
1e+001e+021e+041e+06
Λ
= 0.0 2d
= 0.0 3d
= 0.0 4d
= 0.0 5d
= 0.0 6d
= (M=Q)
20 40 60 100
204080
2d
200 300 400
200300450 3d
1500 2500 4000
15003000
4d
16000 19000 22000
1600020000
5d
140000 170000 200000
140000180000
6d
ω
M−Q
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
−200−1000100200
d
= 2
= 3
= 4
= 5
= 6
ω= 1.0
Figure : Mass M in dependence on their charge Q for different values of d in
Minkowski space-time
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
14. Boson stars in Minkowski background κ > 0 and Λ = 0
ω
M
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
10505005000
κ
= 0.005 5d
= 0.01 5d
= 0.005 4d
= 0.01 4d
= 0.005 3d
= 0.01 3d
= 0.005 2d
= 0.01 2d
ω= 1.0
0.95 0.98 1.01
50200500
3d
0.995 0.998 1.001
20006000
4d
0.95 0.98 1.01
20006000
5d
Figure : The value of the mass M of the boson stars in dependence on the frequency
ω and different values of d and κ.
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
15. Boson stars in Minkowski background
ω
M
0.9980 0.9985 0.9990 0.9995 1.0000
1e+011e+031e+051e+07
D
= 4.0d
= 4.5d
= 4.8d
= 5.0d
ω= 1.0
0.9990 0.9994 0.9998
5e+035e+05
5d
Figure : Mass M of the boson stars in asymptotically flat space-time in dependence
on the frequency ω close to ωmax.
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
16. Boson stars in Minkowski background
r
φ
φ(0)
0 200 400 600 800 1000
0.00.20.40.60.81.0
φ(0) & ω
= 2.190 & 0.9995 lower branch
= 1.880 & 0.9999 middle branch
= 0.001 & 0.9999 upper branch
0 5 10 15 20
0.000.100.20
Figure : Profiles of the scalar field function φ(r)/φ(0) for the case where three
branches of solutions exist close to ωmax in d = 5. Here κ = 0.001.
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
17. Boson stars in Minkowski background
Q
M
1e+01 1e+03 1e+05 1e+07
1e+011e+031e+051e+07
κ
= 0.001 5d
= 0.005 5d
= 0.001 4d
= 0.005 4d
= 0.001 3d
= 0.005 3d
= 0.001 3d
= 0.005 2d
ω= 1.0
10000 15000 20000 25000
200030005000
100000 150000 250000 400000
1e+045e+04
Figure : Mass M of the boson stars in asymptotically flat space-time in dependence
on their charge Q for different values of κ and d.
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
18. Excited Q-balls
φ
V(φ)
−4 −2 0 2 4
−0.02−0.010.000.010.02
ω = 1.2
V = 0.0
r
φ
0 5 10 15 20
−0.10.10.20.30.40.5
k
= 0
= 1
= 2
φ = 0.0
Figure : Effective potential V(φ) and excited solutions.
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
19. Excited Q-balls
ω
Q
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
2e+031e+045e+042e+05
k
= 0
= 1
ω = 1.0
r
φ(r)
0 20 40 60 80 100
−0.20.00.20.40.60.81.0
Profile
= Q min
= Q max at omega min
= Q max at omega max
φ = 0
Figure : Charge Q in dependence on ω for d=4 for nodes k = 1, 2.
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions
20. Excited boson stars
ω
Q
0.93 0.94 0.95 0.96 0.97 0.98 0.99 1.00
2e+031e+045e+042e+05
k & κ
= 0 & 0.01
= 1 & 0.01
= 2 & 0.01
= 3 & 0.01
ω = 1.0
Figure : Charge Q over frequency ω for excited boson star solutions with nodes
k=0,1,2,3.
Jürgen Riedel & Betti Hartmann Supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars in (d + 1) dimensions