This presentation from AISTech 2018 covers the following topics:
- 100% testing
- X-ray fluorescence (XRF)
- The FOX-IQ® on-line XRF analyzer
- Test procedure
- Results
For more information, visit: https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/xrf-xrd/process-on-line-xrf/fox-iq/
Grade Verification and Compositional Analysis Using On-Line XRF as Part of 100% Inspection
1. Grade Verification and Compositional Analysis
Using On-Line XRF as Part of 100% Inspection
Joel Kenyon
Olympus Scientific Solutions Americas
Global Product Manager
3. Introduction
öA single manufacturer can produce hundreds of different alloy
grades
öMixes have consequences
− Aerospace, oil and gas, automotive, etc.
ö100% inspection is ideal but not realistic without automation
öAutomated NDT systems already in use as part of 100%
inspection protocols (visual inspection, eddy current, etc.)
öXRF can be a part of this as well
4. X-ray Fluorescence
öFluorescence = radiation
absorbed and re-emitted at a
different energy level
öX-ray fluorescence (XRF)
− Illuminate sample with X-rays
− Ionization occurs
− Characteristic X-rays emitted
− Characteristic X-rays used to
determine chemistry
Ni
Fe
Cr
Mo
7. The FOX-IQ XRF Analyzer
öElements visible with the FOX-IQ analyzer
8. Test Procedure
öTwo questions:
− Can the FOX-IQ analyzer successfully identify and
differentiate the grades of interest?
− How accurate/precise is the instrument?
öPass/fail analysis with chemistry done manually
öMatch cutoff set to 5 (default)
− Match number closer to 0 = better match
− Match cutoff = highest match number that can pass
öTen repeat tests, 3 seconds each
9. Test Procedure
öSamples: 6 CRMs
− Tested in pairs
according to base
− Already in library
− All contain
molybdenum (Mo)
Grade Name Manufacturer Batch Number
304SS ARMI IARM 162D
316SS ARMI IARM 5D
2.25Cr 1Mo Brammer BS 46A
C 0.5Mo ARMI IARM 229B
Hast C276 Brammer BS H2C
Monel K500 Brammer BS 500D
öMo used as an indicator for accuracy and
repeatability across grades.
13. Results: Identification and Differentiation
öFOX-IQ analyzer successfully identified all 6 grades
öThe analyzer successfully differentiated grades with
same base
öThe analyzer accurately suggested the correct
grade when the sample did not match the selected
grade
14. Results: Accuracy
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MoConcentration(%)
Test
Mo in 304SS
Mo Measured
Mo Assay
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MoConcentration(%)
Test
Mo in 316SS
Mo Measured
Mo Assay
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MoConcentration(%)
Test
Mo in 2.25Cr 1Mo
Mo Measured
Mo Assay
15. Results: Accuracy
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MoConcentration(%)
Test
Mo in C 0.5Mo
Mo Measured
Mo Assay
14.5
14.7
14.9
15.1
15.3
15.5
15.7
15.9
16.1
16.3
16.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MoConcentration(%)
Test
Mo in HastC276
Mo Measured
Mo Assay
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MoConcentration(%)
Test
Mo in MonelK500
Mo Measured
Mo Assay
16. Results: Accuracy
y = 0.9845x + 0.0128
R² = 0.9999
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Avg.MoMeasured(XRF)
Mo Assay
Mo results with FOX-IQ
öMo results are close to assay for all samples
öExcellent linearity relative to assay across all samples
17. Results: Repeatability
öMo used as indicator across grades
ö%RSD <2% for 5/6 grades
öHigh %RSD for Monel due to low levels present
− Only 0.007% difference from assay
öLonger test times could improve precision
Grade Name Mo Assay Avg. Measured Mo (XRF) %RSD
304SS 0.57 0.586 1.95
316SS 2.11 2.184 1.42
2.25Cr 1Mo 0.93 0.876 1.29
C 0.5Mo 0.49 0.458 1.98
Hast C276 15.36 15.13 0.69
Monel K500 0.024 0.031 23.95
18. Conclusions
öXRF and the FOX-IQ analyzer can be an effective part
of 100% inspection protocol
öFast testing with accurate, repeatable results
− ID/differentiation
− Chemistry data
öAbility to automate can improve process
− Short test times
− Greater reliability and repeatability of results
− Increased safety for inspectors
− Test moving samples