The document describes fluidized-bed combustion (FBC) technology, introduced in the 1920s and used for various applications including waste incineration and coal combustion. It details the types of FBC systems (atmospheric and pressurized), their advantages such as high efficiency and flexibility, and disadvantages including issues with fluidization and wear of parts. The conclusion emphasizes the need for further research to enhance FBC technology for cleaner energy production.

1. FLUIDIZED-BED
COMBUSTOR
By
Akash Raj D
2020248026
M.Tech. Polymer science and engineering

2. INTRODUCTION
Fluidized-bed technology was initiated in the 1920s as a process for
refining petroleum and for the production of chemical feedstock from
coal. This technology has been applied for the following since the
1940s:
i. Calcination of Alumina
ii. Cracking of Hydrocarbon
iii. Roasting of Ore
iv. Incineration of Waste

3. Fluidized-bed combustion is a process in which solid particles are
made to exhibit fluid-like properties by suspending these particles
in an upwardly flowing evenly distributed fluid (air or gas) stream.
Combustion takes place in the bed with high heat transfer to the
furnace and low combustion temperatures.

4. The velocity of the fluid at which the fixed bed transforms into the
fluidizing bed is called the minimum fluidization velocity, and it
depends on the following factors:
i. Particle diameter
ii. Particle density
iii. Particle shape
iv. Density of fluid
v. Viscosity of fluid
vi. Void fraction, etc

7. CATEGORIES OF FBC
There are two basic categories of FBC:
1. Atmospheric fluidized-bed combustion (AFBC)
2.Pressurized fluidized-bed combustion (PFBC).
The AFBC option is further comprised of two types:
• Bubbling fluidized-bed combustion (BFBC)
• Circulating fluidized-bed combustion (CFBC).

8. GENERAL ARRANGEMENTS OF AFBC
AFBC boilers comprise of following systems:
i)Fuel feeding system
• Under bed pneumatic feeding
• Over bed feeding
ii) Air Distributor
iii) Bed & In-bed heat transfer surface
iv) Ash handling system
• Bottom ash removal
• Fly ash removal
Many of these are common to all types of FBC boilers

10. BUBBLING FLUIDIZED-BED COMBUSTION
(BFBC)
• Crushed coal size 1 – 10 mm
• Velocity of fluidising air – 1.2 to
3.7 m /sec.
• Narrow temperature range -
800oC to 850oC.
• Unit Size-25MWe
• Thermal Efficiency-30%

11. Compared to a stoker-fired boiler a BFBC boiler has the following
advantages:
i. Reduction of furnace slagging
ii. Reduction of convection pass fouling
iii. Increased boiler availability
iv. Increased boiler efficiency

12. CIRCULATING FLUIDISED BED COMBUSTION
SYSTEM (CFBC)
• Crushed coal size 6 – 12 mm
• Velocity of fluidizing air –
3.7 to 9 m/sec
• Solid recycle – 50 to 100 kg per
kg of fuel burnt
• Unit Size - 250-300MWe
• Thermal Efficiency-40%

14. PRESSURISED FLUIDISED BED COMBUSTION
SYSTEM (PFBC)
• Temperature – 860 C
• Pressure- 16-18bars
• Flue gases expanded in gas
turbine
• Used for cogeneration
• Unit Size-80MWe
• Thermal Efficiency-40%

15. RETROFITTING OF FBC SYSTEMS TO
CONVENTIONAL BOILERS
• Retrofitting fluidized bed coal fired combustion systems to
conventional boilers has been carried out successfully both in India
and abroad.
• The important aspects to be considered in retrofit projects are:
a) Water/steam circulation design
b) Furnace bottom-grate clearance
c) Type of particulate control device
d) Fan capacity
e) Availability of space.

16. ADVANTAGES OF FBC BOILERS
1. High Efficiency
2. Reduction in Boiler Size
3. Fuel Flexibility
4. Ability to Burn Low Grade Fuel
5. Ability to Burn Fines
6. Pollution Control
7. Easier Ash Removal – No Clinker Formation
8. No Slagging in the Furnace-No Soot Blowing
9. Provisions of Automatic Coal and Ash Handling System
10.High Efficiency of Power Generation

17. DISADVANTAGES OF FBC BOILERS
1. Over-size particles result in improper fluidization and impair the combustion
process.
2. Undersized particlesmay escape the free-board (firing) zone, resulting in burning
of fine carbon particles around the cyclone, consequently there will be excursion
of flue gas temperature beyond the furnace zone.
3. Fluidizing nozzles sometimes get plugged, inhibiting proper fluidization of the
fuel bed.
4. Gradual and undetected wear of boiler parts.

18. CONCLUSIONS
• Decreasing electricity prices and improving environmental
protection
• Clean energy
• More flexible than conventional plants
• Reduced emissions and Improved combustion
• Research and development is required in order to improve the FBC
technology.

19. REFERENCES
• Koornneef, Joris & Junginger, Martin & Faaij, A.P.C.. (2007). Development of fluidized bed combustion—An
overview of trends, performance and cost. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 33. 19-55.
10.1016/j.pecs.2006.07.001.
• W., Muskała & Krzywanski, Jaroslaw & Sekret, Robert & Nowak, Wojciec. (2008). Model research of coal
combustion in circulating fluidized bed boilers. Chemical And Process Engineering. 29. 473-492.
• Leckner, Bo. (2003). Fluidized bed combustion research and development in Sweden: A historical survey.
Thermal Science - THERM SCI. 7. 3-16. 10.2298/TSCI0302003L.

20. THANK YOU