Salt F ree Dyeing
            of
Cotton with Reactive Dyes
           Presented by
       Dinesh Chand Sharma
             2002TTF 018



       Under the Guidance of
        Prof. R. B. Chavan
•   Use of cationc agents for salt free dyeing of cotton with reactive dyes

•   Pretreatment of cotton with cationic agent
•   Exhaust method
•   Pad-dry method

•   Comparison of exhaustion and fixation of representatives of procion M, H and Rmazol dyes on
•   Cotton pretreated with cationic agent and dyeing with salt

   To study the effect of cationic agent on the wash fastness and light fastness of reactive dyes.

   To investigate the interference of cationic agent on dye fibre covalent bond formation

   To suggest the tentative mechanism of reactive dye exhaustion in presence of cationic agent but
    in absence of salt.
Objective
   To study the feasibility of the use of cationic dye
    fixing agent and cationising agent (use for exhaust
    dyeing of pigment colour) for the dyeing of cotton
    with reactive dyes in absence of salt.

   Compare the exhaustion and fixation of a
    representative of reactive dyes belonging to Procion
    M, Procion H and Ramazol on cotton when the
    dyeing were carried out in the absence of salt in
    presence of 60 g/l salt and in presence of various
    cationic agent.
Objective
   To study the dyeing behavior of cotton pretreated
    with cationic agent by pad dry application followed
    exhaust dyeing with selected reactive dyes.

   To study the effect of cationic agent on the wash
    fastness and light fastness of reactive dyes.

   To investigate the interference of cationic agent on
    dye fibre covalent bond formation

   To suggest the tentative mechanism of reactive dye
    exhaustion in presence of cationic agent but in
    absence of salt.
I
N              Reactive dye
T
R
O    Discovered in 1956-57 by I. D. Rattee
D     and W. E. Stephen
U
C    Characteristic structure
T
I        S        C          B      X
O
N    S- Solubilising group       C- Chromophor
     B- Bridging group           X- Reactive group
I
N       Expected dye consumption in 2004
T
R
                                                   Sulphur (19%)
O   Reactive dyes (49%)

D
                                                          Direct dyes (19%)
U
C
T
I                                                      Vat dyes (6%)
O                     Azoic dyes ( 4%)   Indigo (3%)
N
I
N
T   Classification of reactive dyes
R
O
D
U     Monofunctional reactive dyes
C
T     Bifunctional reactive dyes
I
O
N
L
I
T
E
R   Problems with Reactive dyes….
A
T
U    Requirement of salt in dyeing process
R
E
     Hydrolysis of dye during dyeing
R
E
V
I
E
W
L
I
T
E
R   Role of salt in dyeing with Reactive dyes
A
T
U
R            Reduces the Zeta potential
E
             Reduction in dye solubility
R
E
V
I
E
W
L
I
T
E
R
A
T
U   Environmental and ecological
R           problems
E

R
E
V           Make points
I
E
W
L
I
T
E            Cationization of fiber
R
A
T    Aminated epoxy derivatives
U
     Glycidyl-tri-methyl-ammonium-chloride (Glytac-A)
R
E
     Polyamide epichlorohydrin (PAE) type polymers
R
     Chlorotriazine type quaternary compounds
E
V
I
E
W
L
I
T
E           Cationization of fiber
R
A
T    N-Methylol acrylamide
U
R    2,4–dichloro–6(2 pyridino ethyl-amino) s-triazine
E
      (DCPEAT)
R    Polyepichlorohydrin (PECH) – Di-methyl-amine
E
V
I
E
W
Deficiency of most of the techniques

 Not economically viable.

 It is so complex that it cannot be incorporated
  in dyeing procedure.
 Surface modification may lead to ring dyeing.

 Probability of uneven pretreatment with
  Cationization agent.
 Inconsistency, reproducibility in compound shades.
•   Existing methods
•   Approach
•   Conditions of treatment
•   Practical problem

• How your approach will eliminate the problems of existing methods..
• Simultaneous pretreatment and dyeing would have been the simplest
  approach but not possible because of dye precipitation
• Simple pretreatment by exhaust and pad dry application
• No special equipments required
• Commercially readily available cationic agents
Materials
• Cotton fabric
• Commercially available cationic agents
• Give names

• Other chemicals as required
• Details in thesis
Experimental Methods
        Dyeing of cotton with reactive dyes

Three sets of experiments were used for dyeing of cotton with
reactive dye –
1.   Dyeing of cotton in presence of 60 g/l
2.    Pretreatment of cotton with 2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10% owf
      with selected cationic agents by exhaust method followed
      by exhaust dyeing in the absence of salt.
3.    Pretreatment of cotton with cationic agent ( 1.25, 2.5, 3.75
      and 5 g/l ) by pad dry application followed by exhaust
      dyeing with reactive dyes in the absence of salt.
Pretreatment of cotton with cationic agent

• Exhaust Method
• Pad dry Method
   – Padding
   – Drying
• Dyeing
• Washing and soaping
• Dyeing on laboratory jigger
 Determination of dye exhaustion

 Determination of colour yield on fabric

 Stripping with dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO)

 Determination of fastness properties

   – Wash fastness (IS 764 : 1979)

   – Rubbing fastness ( IS 766 : 1988)

   – Light fastness (IS 2454 : 1985)
Result and Discussion
  Effect of Pidicron RMG concentration on Dye
                  bath exhaustion
               (Pidicron RMG exhaust application)


                  With
    Dye         Salt 60 g/   2.5%     5%       7.5%    10%
                     l
Procion Red
                   65.5      73.3     77.4      78.0   81.4
   M8B

  Ramazol
                   39.6      34.8     38.3      31.7   46.0
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                   46.0      56.9     70.0      76.8   78.1
    H7G
Effect of Pidicron RMG concentration on Dye
                  bath exhaustion
               (Pidicron RMG pad dry application)

                  With
    Dye         Salt 60 g/   1.25 g/l   2.5 g/l   3.75 g/l   5 g/l
                     l

Procion Red
                   65.5       65.2       68.8      75.2      82.0
   M8B

  Ramazol
                   39.6       35.0       33.0      34.8      50.2
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                   46.0       44.2       62.8      72.5      81.8
    H7G
Effect of Sandofix WEI concentration on Dye
                bath exhaustion
               (Sandofix WEI exhaust application)



                  With
    Dye         Salt 60 g/   2.5%      5%      7.5%    10%
                     l

  Ramazol
                  39.6       76.3     80.7      84.9   89.0
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                  46.0       41.1     54.1      54.7   69.2
    H7G
Effect of Sandofix WEI concentration on Dye
                bath exhaustion
               (Sandofix WEI pad dry application)

                  With
    Dye         Salt 60 g/   1.25 g/l   2.5 g/l   3.75 g/l   5 g/l
                     l

Procion Red
                  65.5        71.7       73.9      79.2      76.1
   M8B

  Ramazol
                  39.6        50.4       66.9      76.9      71.6
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                  46.0        31.2       35.8      46.3      60.9
    H7G
Effect of Tinofix ECO concentration on Dye
                 bath exhaustion
               (Tinofix ECO exhaust application)

                 With
    Dye        Salt 60 g/   2.5%      5%       7.5%   10%
                    l

Procion Red
                  65.5      78.8      81.4     82.1   83.2
   M8B

  Ramazol
                  39.6      53.4      78.4     81.3   86.2
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                  46.0      47.2      54.7     71.7   74.0
    H7G
Effect of Tinofix ECO concentration on Dye
                 bath exhaustion
               (Tinofix ECO pad dry application)


                 With
    Dye        Salt 60 g/   1.25 g/l   2.5 g/l   3.75 g/l   5 g/l
                    l

  Ramazol
                  39.6       50.7       68.3      76.2      77.7
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                  46.0       44.1       51.7      60.0      65.8
    H7G
Comparison of effectiveness of the Cationic Agent on
      Dye bath exhaustion at single concentration
      (5% owf for exhaust and 2.5 g/l for pad dry application)


                Exhaust       Pidicron RMG        Sandofix WEI         Tinofix ECO
    Dye         Dyeing
               60 g/l salt
                             Exhaust   Pad dry   Exhaust   Pad dry   Exhaust   Pad dry

Procion Red
                  100          118      105         -       113        124        -
   M8B


  Ramazol
                  100          97        83        203      169        198      172
 Orange 3R


Procion Blue
                  100          152      137        118        -        119      112
    H7G
Effect of Pidicron RMG concentration on colour yield
                 (Pidicron RMG exhaust application)


                    With
      Dye         Salt 60 g/   2.5%     5%       7.5%   10%
                       l

  Procion Red
                     6.2       5.5       5.2      5.9   5.9
     M8B

    Ramazol
                     4.4       3.3       3.3      3.4   3.5
   Orange 3R

  Procion Blue
                     6.9       8.6       9.5      9.4   9.7
      H7G
Effect of Pidicron RMG concentration on colour yield
                 (Pidicron RMG pad dry application)


                    With
      Dye         Salt 60 g/   1.25 g/l   2.5 g/l   3.75 g/l   5 g/l
                       l

  Procion Red
                     6.2         5.4       6.3        5.3      5.2
     M8B

    Ramazol
                     4.4         3.3       3.2        3.3      3.4
   Orange 3R

  Procion Blue
                     6.9         9.9       10.8      11.3      10.8
      H7G
Effect of Sandofix WEI concentration on colour yield
                (Sandofix WEI exhaust application)


                   With
     Dye         Salt 60 g/   2.5%      5%      7.5%   10%
                      l

  Procion Red
                    6.2       6.2       5.5      5.3   6.4
     M8B

   Ramazol
                    4.4       5.9       6.5      6.5   6.9
  Orange 3R

 Procion Blue
                    6.9       8.0       8.3      8.3   8.8
     H7G
Effect of Sandofix WEI concentration on colour yield
                (Sandofix WEI pad dry application)


                   With
     Dye         Salt 60 g/   1.25 g/l   2.5 g/l   3.75 g/l   5 g/l
                      l

  Procion Red
                    6.2         6.6       7.4        6.1      5.7
     M8B

   Ramazol
                    4.4         8.1       7.8        7.7      7.9
  Orange 3R

 Procion Blue
                    6.9         9.7       9.6        9.2      10.2
     H7G
Effect of Tinofix ECO concentration on colour yield
                (Tinofix ECO exhaust application)


                  With
     Dye        Salt 60 g/   2.5%      5%       7.5%      10%
                     l

 Procion Red
                   6.2        6.1      6.8          6.9   6.4
    M8B

   Ramazol
                   4.4        5.2      5.3          5.9   5.6
  Orange 3R

 Procion Blue
                   6.9        8.1      8.3          9.4   9.5
     H7G
Effect of Tinofix ECO concentration on colour yield
                (Tinofix ECO pad dry application)


                  With
     Dye        Salt 60 g/   1.25 g/l   2.5 g/l   3.75 g/l   5 g/l
                     l

 Procion Red
                   6.2         5.8       6.8        6.5      7.5
    M8B

   Ramazol
                   4.4         5.7       5.4        6.2      7.5
  Orange 3R

 Procion Blue
                   6.9         9.9       11.1      10.9      11.0
     H7G
Comparison of effectiveness of the Cationic Agent on
               colour yield at single concentration
      (5% owf for exhaust and 2.5 g/l for pad dry application)


                 Exhaust       Pidicron RMG        Sandofix WEI         Tinofix ECO
    Dye          Dyeing
                60 g/l salt
                              Exhaust   Pad dry   Exhaust   Pad dry   Exhaust   Pad dry

Procion Red
                   100          87       100        96       117        90       107
   M8B


  Ramazol
                   100          70        72        145      177        132      123
 Orange 3R


Procion Blue
                   100          148      168        126      150        127      173
    H7G
Effect of cationic agent on the colour yield at single
                  concentration on Jigger
        (Solidozon NRL, 5% owf for exhaust method)


    Colour yield of jigger dyed sample pretreated with NRL and
    in presence of salt in terms of k/s value obtained are –
                     With salt (60 g/l) = 5.2
                       With 5% NRL = 9.1
 Delete show only sample without mentioning the name of
    cationic agent
Comparison of effectiveness of cationic agent on dye
            bath exhaustion and colour yield
•        % exhaustion and colour yield % dye bath exhaustion increases as
         compare to dyeing carried out in presence of salt.
•        % exhaustion (exception Procion Blue H7G) is not directly
         proportional to colour yield is less.?
•        Possible reason for this the covalent bond formation of dye of
         exhausted dye is hindered to some extent by the presence of
         cationic agent on the fabric.
•        The possible reason for such hindrance by cationic agent may be
         due to –
     –      Blocking part of - OH group due to electrostatic bond formation
            between negatively charged -OH groups of cellulose and positively
            charge of cationic agent. Resulting in reduced number of -OH groups
            available for covalent bond formation with cellulose.
     –      The complex formation between cationic agent and the dye. The
            complexed dye having reduced reactivity towards cellulose.
Effect of cationic agent on loss in depth of shade on
                stripping with DMSO
               (Pidicron RMG exhaust application)

                  With
    Dye         Salt 60 g/   2.5 %    5%       7.5 %   10 %
                     l

 Procion Red
                   9.0       46.0     34.3      48.6   43.7
    M8B

  Ramazol
                   14.7       7.2     12.5      16.3   11.8
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                   59.0      19.9     16.1      11.1   12.7
    H7G
Effect of cationic agent on loss in depth of shade on
                stripping with DMSO
               (Pidicron RMG pad dry application)

                  With
    Dye         Salt 60 g/   1.25 g/l   2.5 g/l   3.75 g/l   5 g/l
                     l

 Procion Red
                   9.0        21.6       41.4      60.1      48.4
    M8B

  Ramazol
                   14.7        9.7       10.4      15.6      11.5
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                   59.0       24.7       21.7      24.3      16.5
    H7G
Effect of cationic agent on loss in depth of shade on
                stripping with DMSO
               (Sandofix WEI exhaust application)

                  With
    Dye         Salt 60 g/   2.5 %     5%      7.5 %   10 %
                     l

 Procion Red
                   9.0        6.1     16.8      28.6   13.5
    M8B

  Ramazol
                  14.7       72.9     74.1      72.8   69.7
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                  59.0       29.2     26.6      32.8   22.8
    H7G
Effect of cationic agent on loss in depth of shade on
                stripping with DMSO
               (Sandofix WEI pad dry application)

                  With
    Dye         Salt 60 g/   1.25 g/l   2.5 g/l   3.75 g/l   5 g/l
                     l

 Procion Red
                   9.0        21.8       28.6      16.4      28.9
    M8B

  Ramazol
                  14.7        85.4       89.7      92.1      91.6
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                  59.0        44.8       29.2      20.5      33.6
    H7G
Effect of cationic agent on loss in depth of shade on
                stripping with DMSO
               (Tinofix ECO exhaust application)

                 With
    Dye        Salt 60 g/   2.5 %     5%       7.5 %      10 %
                    l

 Procion Red
                  9.0       10.3      13.8         3.7    8.7
    M8B

  Ramazol
                  14.7      37.4      53.6         46.4   42.4
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                  59.0      18.9      8.9          9.0    12.6
    H7G
Effect of cationic agent on loss in depth of shade on
                stripping with DMSO
               (Tinofix ECO pad dry application)

                 With
    Dye        Salt 60 g/   1.25 g/l   2.5 g/l   3.75 g/l   5 g/l
                    l

 Procion Red
                  9.0         4.8       4.1       17.8      24.4
    M8B

  Ramazol
                  14.7       35.7       30.3      45.4      47.8
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                  59.0       13.8       23.2      25.1      16.0
    H7G
Effect of cationising agent and covalent bond
         formation between dye and fibre

The order of loss in depth and shade in following order –
      Sandofix WEI > Tinofix ECO > Pidicron RMG
Following general conclusions may be drawn from the DMSO stripping test
 1. Procion Red M8B: The loss in depth was more for cotton treated with
    three cationic agents compared to salt dyeing.
 2. Ramazol Orange 3R: The loss in depth in case of pretreatment with
    Pidicron RMG was equivalent to salt dyeing. In case of Sandofix WEI
    almost complete stripping took place-indicating deactivation of Ramazol
    Orange 3R. Whereas in case of Tinofix ECO the loss in depth was higher
    compared to salt dyeing.
 3. Procion Blue H7G: The loss in depth was higher for salt dyeing compared
    to cotton pretreated with cationic agents.
 4. No general trend in terms of loss in depth was observed. Therefore it is
    necessary to study the effect of cationic agents on individual dyes.
Mechanism of dye fibre exhaustion and fixation

    Interaction of dye fixating agent with cellulose
     The extent of dye bath exhaustion was also higher than the dyeing
     carried out in presence of salt there could be two possibility for this
     observation.
    1.   The reduction in surface potential of cationic agent pretreated
         cotton is higher than that is achieved by using 60 g/l salt.
    2.   In addition to reduction in surface potential the presence of
         cationic agent attracts the dye by electrostatic force of attraction.


    Interaction of dye fixing agent with dye
Wash Fastness
Effect of Pidicron RMG on wash fastness (change of colour)


                 With
    Dye        Salt 60 g/   2.5 %   5%     7.5 %    10 %
                    l

Procion Red
                  4-5         3     3        3       3
   M8B

  Ramazol
                   5          5     4-5     4-5      4-5
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                  3-4        3-4    3-4     3-4      3-4
    H7G
Wash Fastness
Effect of Sandofix WEI on wash fastness (change of colour)


                 With
    Dye        Salt 60 g/   2.5 %   5%     7.5 %    10 %
                    l

Procion Red
                   5          5     5        5        5
   M8B

  Ramazol
                   4          4     4       4-5      4-5
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                   4          4     5       4-5      4-5
    H7G
Wash Fastness
Effect of Tinofix ECO on wash fastness (change of colour)


                 With
    Dye        Salt 60 g/   2.5 %   5%    7.5 %    10 %
                    l

Procion Red
                   5          5     5       5       4-5
   M8B

  Ramazol
                   5          5     4-5     5        5
 Orange 3R

Procion Blue
                   4          4     4       4        4
    H7G
Rubbing Fastness
           Effect of Pidicron RMG on Rubbing fastness

                                     With salt
   Dye             Fastness                      2.5 %   5%    7.5 %   10 %
                                      60 g/l

              Dry rubbing fastness      5         4-5    4-5    4-5    4-5
Procion red
   M8B
              Wet rubbing fastness     4-5        3      3      3       3

              Dry rubbing fastness      5         5      5      5       5
 Ramazol
Orange 3R
              Wet rubbing fastness      5         5      4-5    4-5    4-5

              Dry rubbing fastness      5         3-4    3-4    3-4    3-4
 Procion
Blue H7G
              Wet rubbing fastness      5         3      2-3    3-4    2-3
Rubbing Fastness
            Effect of Sandofix WEI on Rubbing fastness

                                     With salt
   Dye             Fastness                      2.5 %   5%    7.5 %   10 %
                                      60 g/l

              Dry rubbing fastness      5         4-5    4-5    4-5    4-5
Procion red
   M8B
              Wet rubbing fastness     4-5        3      3      3       3

              Dry rubbing fastness      5         4-5    4-5    4-5    4-5
 Ramazol
Orange 3R
              Wet rubbing fastness      5         3      3      3       3

              Dry rubbing fastness      5         4-5    4-5    4-5    4-5
 Procion
Blue H7G
              Wet rubbing fastness     4-5        3      3      3       3
Rubbing Fastness
              Effect of Tinofix ECO on Rubbing fastness

                                       With salt
   Dye               Fastness                      2.5 %   5%    7.5 %   10 %
                                        60 g/l

                Dry rubbing fastness      5         5      5      5       5
Procion red
   M8B
                Wet rubbing fastness      5         4-5    3-4    3-4    3-4

                Dry rubbing fastness      5         5      4-5    4-5    4-5
 Ramazol
Orange 3R
                Wet rubbing fastness     4-5        3-4    3      3       3

                Dry rubbing fastness      5         4-5    4-5    4-5    4-5
 Procion
Blue H7G
                Wet rubbing fastness     4-5        3-4    3      3       3
Light fastness
            Effect on cationic agent on light fastness
             (Cationic agent concentration 5% owf)

               With salt 60   Pidicron     Sandofix
   Dye                                                   Tinofix ECO
                   g/l         RMG           WEI


Procion Red
                   4-5           3             3             3
   M8B

 Ramazol
                   4-5           3             1            1-2
Orange 3R

 Procion
                    5           4-5           4-5           4-5
Blue H7G
Conclusion
   Pretreatment of cotton with three selected dye fixing agents
    applied by exhaust method and pad dry application gave dye
    bath exhaustion higher or equivalent to dye bath exhaustion
    in presence of 60 g/l salt.


   In general there was increased in dye bath exhaustion with
    increase in cationic agent concentration for both exhaust
    application and pad dry application. However, pretreatment
    with 2.5 to 5% owf. by exhaust method and 2.5 g/l
    concentration by pad dry application are good enough to give
    the dye bath exhaustion equivalent or better than salt dyeing.


   Exhaust method of pretreatment of cotton was more effective
    compared to pad dry application.
Conclusion

   Pretreatment of cotton with cationic agent both by exhaust
    method and pad dry method gave colour yield (k/s). as good as
    salt dyeing.


   The extent of stripping of dyed sample with DMSO in general
    was higher for cotton pretreated with cationic agent compare to
    salt dyeing. Exception to this was the stripping of blue H7G,
    which was higher in case of salt dyeing.


   A tentative mechanism of dye bath exhaustion on cotton
    pretreatment with cationic agent is suggested.
Conclusion
 In general the wash fastness and dry rubbing fastness was not affected
  for dyeing carried out on cotton pretreated with cationic agent.
  Pretreatment of cationic agent lower the wet rubbing fastness
  compared to salt dyeing.


 The pretreatment with cationic agent of cotton lower the light fastness
  of all the three dyes. The maximum reduction in light fastness was in
  case of Orange 3R and marginal reduction in case of Procion Blue
  H7G.


 A remarkably simple method is suggested for salt free dyeing of
  cotton with reactive dyes. This subject has been investigated for long
  by many researchers. It will essential to analyse the environmental
  merits/demerits of this method.
Scope of Future Work
1.   Analysis of environmental merits/benefit of salt free
     dyeing reported in the present thesis.


3.   Quantitative estimation of cationic agent on cotton.


5.   To investigate the salt free dyeing of cotton with direct
     dyes and effect on fastness properties.


7.   To establish the exact mechanism of dye bath
     exhaustion on cotton pretreated with cationic agent.
Thank you !!!

Final low-salt

  • 1.
    Salt F reeDyeing of Cotton with Reactive Dyes Presented by Dinesh Chand Sharma 2002TTF 018 Under the Guidance of Prof. R. B. Chavan
  • 2.
    Use of cationc agents for salt free dyeing of cotton with reactive dyes • Pretreatment of cotton with cationic agent • Exhaust method • Pad-dry method • Comparison of exhaustion and fixation of representatives of procion M, H and Rmazol dyes on • Cotton pretreated with cationic agent and dyeing with salt  To study the effect of cationic agent on the wash fastness and light fastness of reactive dyes.  To investigate the interference of cationic agent on dye fibre covalent bond formation  To suggest the tentative mechanism of reactive dye exhaustion in presence of cationic agent but in absence of salt.
  • 3.
    Objective  To study the feasibility of the use of cationic dye fixing agent and cationising agent (use for exhaust dyeing of pigment colour) for the dyeing of cotton with reactive dyes in absence of salt.  Compare the exhaustion and fixation of a representative of reactive dyes belonging to Procion M, Procion H and Ramazol on cotton when the dyeing were carried out in the absence of salt in presence of 60 g/l salt and in presence of various cationic agent.
  • 4.
    Objective  To study the dyeing behavior of cotton pretreated with cationic agent by pad dry application followed exhaust dyeing with selected reactive dyes.  To study the effect of cationic agent on the wash fastness and light fastness of reactive dyes.  To investigate the interference of cationic agent on dye fibre covalent bond formation  To suggest the tentative mechanism of reactive dye exhaustion in presence of cationic agent but in absence of salt.
  • 5.
    I N Reactive dye T R O  Discovered in 1956-57 by I. D. Rattee D and W. E. Stephen U C  Characteristic structure T I S C B X O N S- Solubilising group C- Chromophor B- Bridging group X- Reactive group
  • 6.
    I N Expected dye consumption in 2004 T R Sulphur (19%) O Reactive dyes (49%) D Direct dyes (19%) U C T I Vat dyes (6%) O Azoic dyes ( 4%) Indigo (3%) N
  • 7.
    I N T Classification of reactive dyes R O D U  Monofunctional reactive dyes C T  Bifunctional reactive dyes I O N
  • 8.
    L I T E R Problems with Reactive dyes…. A T U  Requirement of salt in dyeing process R E  Hydrolysis of dye during dyeing R E V I E W
  • 9.
    L I T E R Role of salt in dyeing with Reactive dyes A T U R  Reduces the Zeta potential E  Reduction in dye solubility R E V I E W
  • 10.
    L I T E R A T U Environmental and ecological R problems E R E V Make points I E W
  • 11.
    L I T E Cationization of fiber R A T  Aminated epoxy derivatives U  Glycidyl-tri-methyl-ammonium-chloride (Glytac-A) R E  Polyamide epichlorohydrin (PAE) type polymers R  Chlorotriazine type quaternary compounds E V I E W
  • 12.
    L I T E Cationization of fiber R A T  N-Methylol acrylamide U R  2,4–dichloro–6(2 pyridino ethyl-amino) s-triazine E (DCPEAT) R  Polyepichlorohydrin (PECH) – Di-methyl-amine E V I E W
  • 13.
    Deficiency of mostof the techniques  Not economically viable.  It is so complex that it cannot be incorporated in dyeing procedure.  Surface modification may lead to ring dyeing.  Probability of uneven pretreatment with Cationization agent.  Inconsistency, reproducibility in compound shades.
  • 14.
    Existing methods • Approach • Conditions of treatment • Practical problem • How your approach will eliminate the problems of existing methods.. • Simultaneous pretreatment and dyeing would have been the simplest approach but not possible because of dye precipitation • Simple pretreatment by exhaust and pad dry application • No special equipments required • Commercially readily available cationic agents
  • 15.
    Materials • Cotton fabric •Commercially available cationic agents • Give names • Other chemicals as required • Details in thesis
  • 16.
    Experimental Methods Dyeing of cotton with reactive dyes Three sets of experiments were used for dyeing of cotton with reactive dye – 1. Dyeing of cotton in presence of 60 g/l 2. Pretreatment of cotton with 2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10% owf with selected cationic agents by exhaust method followed by exhaust dyeing in the absence of salt. 3. Pretreatment of cotton with cationic agent ( 1.25, 2.5, 3.75 and 5 g/l ) by pad dry application followed by exhaust dyeing with reactive dyes in the absence of salt.
  • 17.
    Pretreatment of cottonwith cationic agent • Exhaust Method • Pad dry Method – Padding – Drying • Dyeing • Washing and soaping • Dyeing on laboratory jigger
  • 18.
     Determination ofdye exhaustion  Determination of colour yield on fabric  Stripping with dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO)  Determination of fastness properties – Wash fastness (IS 764 : 1979) – Rubbing fastness ( IS 766 : 1988) – Light fastness (IS 2454 : 1985)
  • 19.
    Result and Discussion Effect of Pidicron RMG concentration on Dye bath exhaustion (Pidicron RMG exhaust application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 2.5% 5% 7.5% 10% l Procion Red 65.5 73.3 77.4 78.0 81.4 M8B Ramazol 39.6 34.8 38.3 31.7 46.0 Orange 3R Procion Blue 46.0 56.9 70.0 76.8 78.1 H7G
  • 20.
    Effect of PidicronRMG concentration on Dye bath exhaustion (Pidicron RMG pad dry application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 1.25 g/l 2.5 g/l 3.75 g/l 5 g/l l Procion Red 65.5 65.2 68.8 75.2 82.0 M8B Ramazol 39.6 35.0 33.0 34.8 50.2 Orange 3R Procion Blue 46.0 44.2 62.8 72.5 81.8 H7G
  • 21.
    Effect of SandofixWEI concentration on Dye bath exhaustion (Sandofix WEI exhaust application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 2.5% 5% 7.5% 10% l Ramazol 39.6 76.3 80.7 84.9 89.0 Orange 3R Procion Blue 46.0 41.1 54.1 54.7 69.2 H7G
  • 22.
    Effect of SandofixWEI concentration on Dye bath exhaustion (Sandofix WEI pad dry application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 1.25 g/l 2.5 g/l 3.75 g/l 5 g/l l Procion Red 65.5 71.7 73.9 79.2 76.1 M8B Ramazol 39.6 50.4 66.9 76.9 71.6 Orange 3R Procion Blue 46.0 31.2 35.8 46.3 60.9 H7G
  • 23.
    Effect of TinofixECO concentration on Dye bath exhaustion (Tinofix ECO exhaust application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 2.5% 5% 7.5% 10% l Procion Red 65.5 78.8 81.4 82.1 83.2 M8B Ramazol 39.6 53.4 78.4 81.3 86.2 Orange 3R Procion Blue 46.0 47.2 54.7 71.7 74.0 H7G
  • 24.
    Effect of TinofixECO concentration on Dye bath exhaustion (Tinofix ECO pad dry application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 1.25 g/l 2.5 g/l 3.75 g/l 5 g/l l Ramazol 39.6 50.7 68.3 76.2 77.7 Orange 3R Procion Blue 46.0 44.1 51.7 60.0 65.8 H7G
  • 25.
    Comparison of effectivenessof the Cationic Agent on Dye bath exhaustion at single concentration (5% owf for exhaust and 2.5 g/l for pad dry application) Exhaust Pidicron RMG Sandofix WEI Tinofix ECO Dye Dyeing 60 g/l salt Exhaust Pad dry Exhaust Pad dry Exhaust Pad dry Procion Red 100 118 105 - 113 124 - M8B Ramazol 100 97 83 203 169 198 172 Orange 3R Procion Blue 100 152 137 118 - 119 112 H7G
  • 26.
    Effect of PidicronRMG concentration on colour yield (Pidicron RMG exhaust application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 2.5% 5% 7.5% 10% l Procion Red 6.2 5.5 5.2 5.9 5.9 M8B Ramazol 4.4 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.5 Orange 3R Procion Blue 6.9 8.6 9.5 9.4 9.7 H7G
  • 27.
    Effect of PidicronRMG concentration on colour yield (Pidicron RMG pad dry application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 1.25 g/l 2.5 g/l 3.75 g/l 5 g/l l Procion Red 6.2 5.4 6.3 5.3 5.2 M8B Ramazol 4.4 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.4 Orange 3R Procion Blue 6.9 9.9 10.8 11.3 10.8 H7G
  • 28.
    Effect of SandofixWEI concentration on colour yield (Sandofix WEI exhaust application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 2.5% 5% 7.5% 10% l Procion Red 6.2 6.2 5.5 5.3 6.4 M8B Ramazol 4.4 5.9 6.5 6.5 6.9 Orange 3R Procion Blue 6.9 8.0 8.3 8.3 8.8 H7G
  • 29.
    Effect of SandofixWEI concentration on colour yield (Sandofix WEI pad dry application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 1.25 g/l 2.5 g/l 3.75 g/l 5 g/l l Procion Red 6.2 6.6 7.4 6.1 5.7 M8B Ramazol 4.4 8.1 7.8 7.7 7.9 Orange 3R Procion Blue 6.9 9.7 9.6 9.2 10.2 H7G
  • 30.
    Effect of TinofixECO concentration on colour yield (Tinofix ECO exhaust application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 2.5% 5% 7.5% 10% l Procion Red 6.2 6.1 6.8 6.9 6.4 M8B Ramazol 4.4 5.2 5.3 5.9 5.6 Orange 3R Procion Blue 6.9 8.1 8.3 9.4 9.5 H7G
  • 31.
    Effect of TinofixECO concentration on colour yield (Tinofix ECO pad dry application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 1.25 g/l 2.5 g/l 3.75 g/l 5 g/l l Procion Red 6.2 5.8 6.8 6.5 7.5 M8B Ramazol 4.4 5.7 5.4 6.2 7.5 Orange 3R Procion Blue 6.9 9.9 11.1 10.9 11.0 H7G
  • 32.
    Comparison of effectivenessof the Cationic Agent on colour yield at single concentration (5% owf for exhaust and 2.5 g/l for pad dry application) Exhaust Pidicron RMG Sandofix WEI Tinofix ECO Dye Dyeing 60 g/l salt Exhaust Pad dry Exhaust Pad dry Exhaust Pad dry Procion Red 100 87 100 96 117 90 107 M8B Ramazol 100 70 72 145 177 132 123 Orange 3R Procion Blue 100 148 168 126 150 127 173 H7G
  • 33.
    Effect of cationicagent on the colour yield at single concentration on Jigger (Solidozon NRL, 5% owf for exhaust method) Colour yield of jigger dyed sample pretreated with NRL and in presence of salt in terms of k/s value obtained are – With salt (60 g/l) = 5.2 With 5% NRL = 9.1 Delete show only sample without mentioning the name of cationic agent
  • 34.
    Comparison of effectivenessof cationic agent on dye bath exhaustion and colour yield • % exhaustion and colour yield % dye bath exhaustion increases as compare to dyeing carried out in presence of salt. • % exhaustion (exception Procion Blue H7G) is not directly proportional to colour yield is less.? • Possible reason for this the covalent bond formation of dye of exhausted dye is hindered to some extent by the presence of cationic agent on the fabric. • The possible reason for such hindrance by cationic agent may be due to – – Blocking part of - OH group due to electrostatic bond formation between negatively charged -OH groups of cellulose and positively charge of cationic agent. Resulting in reduced number of -OH groups available for covalent bond formation with cellulose. – The complex formation between cationic agent and the dye. The complexed dye having reduced reactivity towards cellulose.
  • 35.
    Effect of cationicagent on loss in depth of shade on stripping with DMSO (Pidicron RMG exhaust application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 2.5 % 5% 7.5 % 10 % l Procion Red 9.0 46.0 34.3 48.6 43.7 M8B Ramazol 14.7 7.2 12.5 16.3 11.8 Orange 3R Procion Blue 59.0 19.9 16.1 11.1 12.7 H7G
  • 36.
    Effect of cationicagent on loss in depth of shade on stripping with DMSO (Pidicron RMG pad dry application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 1.25 g/l 2.5 g/l 3.75 g/l 5 g/l l Procion Red 9.0 21.6 41.4 60.1 48.4 M8B Ramazol 14.7 9.7 10.4 15.6 11.5 Orange 3R Procion Blue 59.0 24.7 21.7 24.3 16.5 H7G
  • 37.
    Effect of cationicagent on loss in depth of shade on stripping with DMSO (Sandofix WEI exhaust application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 2.5 % 5% 7.5 % 10 % l Procion Red 9.0 6.1 16.8 28.6 13.5 M8B Ramazol 14.7 72.9 74.1 72.8 69.7 Orange 3R Procion Blue 59.0 29.2 26.6 32.8 22.8 H7G
  • 38.
    Effect of cationicagent on loss in depth of shade on stripping with DMSO (Sandofix WEI pad dry application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 1.25 g/l 2.5 g/l 3.75 g/l 5 g/l l Procion Red 9.0 21.8 28.6 16.4 28.9 M8B Ramazol 14.7 85.4 89.7 92.1 91.6 Orange 3R Procion Blue 59.0 44.8 29.2 20.5 33.6 H7G
  • 39.
    Effect of cationicagent on loss in depth of shade on stripping with DMSO (Tinofix ECO exhaust application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 2.5 % 5% 7.5 % 10 % l Procion Red 9.0 10.3 13.8 3.7 8.7 M8B Ramazol 14.7 37.4 53.6 46.4 42.4 Orange 3R Procion Blue 59.0 18.9 8.9 9.0 12.6 H7G
  • 40.
    Effect of cationicagent on loss in depth of shade on stripping with DMSO (Tinofix ECO pad dry application) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 1.25 g/l 2.5 g/l 3.75 g/l 5 g/l l Procion Red 9.0 4.8 4.1 17.8 24.4 M8B Ramazol 14.7 35.7 30.3 45.4 47.8 Orange 3R Procion Blue 59.0 13.8 23.2 25.1 16.0 H7G
  • 41.
    Effect of cationisingagent and covalent bond formation between dye and fibre The order of loss in depth and shade in following order – Sandofix WEI > Tinofix ECO > Pidicron RMG Following general conclusions may be drawn from the DMSO stripping test 1. Procion Red M8B: The loss in depth was more for cotton treated with three cationic agents compared to salt dyeing. 2. Ramazol Orange 3R: The loss in depth in case of pretreatment with Pidicron RMG was equivalent to salt dyeing. In case of Sandofix WEI almost complete stripping took place-indicating deactivation of Ramazol Orange 3R. Whereas in case of Tinofix ECO the loss in depth was higher compared to salt dyeing. 3. Procion Blue H7G: The loss in depth was higher for salt dyeing compared to cotton pretreated with cationic agents. 4. No general trend in terms of loss in depth was observed. Therefore it is necessary to study the effect of cationic agents on individual dyes.
  • 42.
    Mechanism of dyefibre exhaustion and fixation  Interaction of dye fixating agent with cellulose The extent of dye bath exhaustion was also higher than the dyeing carried out in presence of salt there could be two possibility for this observation. 1. The reduction in surface potential of cationic agent pretreated cotton is higher than that is achieved by using 60 g/l salt. 2. In addition to reduction in surface potential the presence of cationic agent attracts the dye by electrostatic force of attraction.  Interaction of dye fixing agent with dye
  • 43.
    Wash Fastness Effect ofPidicron RMG on wash fastness (change of colour) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 2.5 % 5% 7.5 % 10 % l Procion Red 4-5 3 3 3 3 M8B Ramazol 5 5 4-5 4-5 4-5 Orange 3R Procion Blue 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 H7G
  • 44.
    Wash Fastness Effect ofSandofix WEI on wash fastness (change of colour) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 2.5 % 5% 7.5 % 10 % l Procion Red 5 5 5 5 5 M8B Ramazol 4 4 4 4-5 4-5 Orange 3R Procion Blue 4 4 5 4-5 4-5 H7G
  • 45.
    Wash Fastness Effect ofTinofix ECO on wash fastness (change of colour) With Dye Salt 60 g/ 2.5 % 5% 7.5 % 10 % l Procion Red 5 5 5 5 4-5 M8B Ramazol 5 5 4-5 5 5 Orange 3R Procion Blue 4 4 4 4 4 H7G
  • 46.
    Rubbing Fastness Effect of Pidicron RMG on Rubbing fastness With salt Dye Fastness 2.5 % 5% 7.5 % 10 % 60 g/l Dry rubbing fastness 5 4-5 4-5 4-5 4-5 Procion red M8B Wet rubbing fastness 4-5 3 3 3 3 Dry rubbing fastness 5 5 5 5 5 Ramazol Orange 3R Wet rubbing fastness 5 5 4-5 4-5 4-5 Dry rubbing fastness 5 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 Procion Blue H7G Wet rubbing fastness 5 3 2-3 3-4 2-3
  • 47.
    Rubbing Fastness Effect of Sandofix WEI on Rubbing fastness With salt Dye Fastness 2.5 % 5% 7.5 % 10 % 60 g/l Dry rubbing fastness 5 4-5 4-5 4-5 4-5 Procion red M8B Wet rubbing fastness 4-5 3 3 3 3 Dry rubbing fastness 5 4-5 4-5 4-5 4-5 Ramazol Orange 3R Wet rubbing fastness 5 3 3 3 3 Dry rubbing fastness 5 4-5 4-5 4-5 4-5 Procion Blue H7G Wet rubbing fastness 4-5 3 3 3 3
  • 48.
    Rubbing Fastness Effect of Tinofix ECO on Rubbing fastness With salt Dye Fastness 2.5 % 5% 7.5 % 10 % 60 g/l Dry rubbing fastness 5 5 5 5 5 Procion red M8B Wet rubbing fastness 5 4-5 3-4 3-4 3-4 Dry rubbing fastness 5 5 4-5 4-5 4-5 Ramazol Orange 3R Wet rubbing fastness 4-5 3-4 3 3 3 Dry rubbing fastness 5 4-5 4-5 4-5 4-5 Procion Blue H7G Wet rubbing fastness 4-5 3-4 3 3 3
  • 49.
    Light fastness Effect on cationic agent on light fastness (Cationic agent concentration 5% owf) With salt 60 Pidicron Sandofix Dye Tinofix ECO g/l RMG WEI Procion Red 4-5 3 3 3 M8B Ramazol 4-5 3 1 1-2 Orange 3R Procion 5 4-5 4-5 4-5 Blue H7G
  • 50.
    Conclusion  Pretreatment of cotton with three selected dye fixing agents applied by exhaust method and pad dry application gave dye bath exhaustion higher or equivalent to dye bath exhaustion in presence of 60 g/l salt.  In general there was increased in dye bath exhaustion with increase in cationic agent concentration for both exhaust application and pad dry application. However, pretreatment with 2.5 to 5% owf. by exhaust method and 2.5 g/l concentration by pad dry application are good enough to give the dye bath exhaustion equivalent or better than salt dyeing.  Exhaust method of pretreatment of cotton was more effective compared to pad dry application.
  • 51.
    Conclusion  Pretreatment of cotton with cationic agent both by exhaust method and pad dry method gave colour yield (k/s). as good as salt dyeing.  The extent of stripping of dyed sample with DMSO in general was higher for cotton pretreated with cationic agent compare to salt dyeing. Exception to this was the stripping of blue H7G, which was higher in case of salt dyeing.  A tentative mechanism of dye bath exhaustion on cotton pretreatment with cationic agent is suggested.
  • 52.
    Conclusion  In generalthe wash fastness and dry rubbing fastness was not affected for dyeing carried out on cotton pretreated with cationic agent. Pretreatment of cationic agent lower the wet rubbing fastness compared to salt dyeing.  The pretreatment with cationic agent of cotton lower the light fastness of all the three dyes. The maximum reduction in light fastness was in case of Orange 3R and marginal reduction in case of Procion Blue H7G.  A remarkably simple method is suggested for salt free dyeing of cotton with reactive dyes. This subject has been investigated for long by many researchers. It will essential to analyse the environmental merits/demerits of this method.
  • 53.
    Scope of FutureWork 1. Analysis of environmental merits/benefit of salt free dyeing reported in the present thesis. 3. Quantitative estimation of cationic agent on cotton. 5. To investigate the salt free dyeing of cotton with direct dyes and effect on fastness properties. 7. To establish the exact mechanism of dye bath exhaustion on cotton pretreated with cationic agent.
  • 54.