Extended Essay Assessment Criteria

Know your Subject Guide thoroughly
 Subject Guide
• Overview
• Choice of Topic
• Treatment of the Topic
 Look for:
• What to avoid
• What the focus should be
• How to approach the topic
• Anything emphasized as being important


Choice of Topic: The Research
Question


A Good Research Question:

 Takes a stand.
 Justifies discussion.
 Expresses one main idea.
 Is specific. (Think 4,000 word limit)
 Lends itself to systematic investigation.
Specific to the EE
 Can’t be answered with yes/no.
 Can’t be influenced by personal opinion.

Page 4 © International Baccalaureate Organization 2009

What is a good research
question?
 Biology: Does classical music, rock music or
silence in any way influence memory?
 Group 1: Is Harry Potter an effective way to get
children to read?
 Economics: To what extent have the South
Tyrolean government’s policies been effective in
reducing vehicle carbon emissions?


Command Terms Can Become Question
Stems
 Account for — Asks candidates to explain a particular event or
outcome. Candidates are expected to present a reasoned case for
the existence of something.

 How — On its own this is a straightforward invitation to present an
account of a given situation or development. Often a second part
will be added to such an essay question to encourage analysis.
• Adding a second word such as "successfully", "effective",
"accurate", or "far" turns a "how" question into one that
requires a judgment. The candidate is now expected to provide
his/her detailed reasons for that judgment.

Command Terms Can Become Question
Stems
 To what extent — Asks candidates to evaluate the success or
otherwise of one argument or concept over another. Candidates
should present a conclusion supported by arguments.

 Why — This short key word invites candidates to present reasons
for the existence of something. Thus, the brevity of this command
rather disguises a powerful requirement to present a detailed,
reasoned argument. In effect it is similar to the invitation "account
for".


Assessment Criteria

A Research Question 2
B Introduction 2
C Investigation 4
D Knowledge/Understanding 4
E Reasoned Argument 4
F Apply Analysis & Evaluation 4
G Language Appropriate 4
H Conclusion 2
I Formal Presentation 4
J Abstract 2
K Holistic Judgment 4

EE Grade Boundaries for IB

A 29 – 36
B 23 – 28
C 16 – 22
D 8 – 15
E 0 – 7 (failing condition)


EE Grades in GCPS Value
IB EE Grade GCPS Equivalent
A 30-36
A 29 – 36 B 23-29
B 23 – 28 C 17-22
C 16 – 22 D 11 – 16
D 8 – 15 F 10 and below
E 0–7

Criterion A: The Research Question 2
points

 Assesses the extent to which the purpose of the essay is specified
 Getting this right is the most critical aspect of writing the
essay
• Can limit achievement in other areas
 Topic must be relevant to the subject


Choose the correct achievement level for this research
question: Why did Israel win The Six Day War of
1967?
A. 0
71%
B. 1
C. 2

014% 14%

1

2

Criterion B: Introduction 2 points

 Assesses how the research question relates to existing
knowledge AND assesses explanation of how topic is significant
and why worthy of investigation
 Recommend a header for this section; 1-2 paragraphs
 Point out if research addresses an open issue; an unresolved
question; or issue that hasn’t been explored in same manner
 Should be well referenced and point out what others have said
and what’s already known


Choose the correct achievement level:

A. 0
82%
B. 1
C. 2

18%

0%
0

1

2

Criterion C: Investigation 4 points

 Assesses how investigation is planned and sources used/data
collected
 NOT a summary of facts and information
 Works Cited needs a wide range of sources actually used/cited in
text of paper
 Should include process for obtaining and selecting information
and their relevance or reliability



A. 0 30% 30%

B. 1 26%

C. 2
D. 3
13%
E. 4

0%
0

1

2

3

4

Criterion D: Knowledge and
understanding of the topic studied 4
points
 Assesses the extent to which a pre-university student can relate
their investigation to the current state in the field of study
 Explain underlying theories, basic terms
 Paraphrasing!! Students should put research into their own words
 Explain info, draw inferences, point out possible relationships



A. 0
B. 1 52%

C. 2
D. 3
26%
E. 4

7% 7% 7%
0

1

2

3

4

Criterion E: Reasoned argument 4 points

 Assesses extent to which essay presents ideas in a logical and
coherent manner
 Assesses development of reasoned argument in relation to the
research question
 Must explicitly link information’s importance or relevance to
research question
 Probably will be most difficult part of writing process for students



A. 0
64%
B. 1
C. 2
D. 3
E. 4 28%

8%
0% 0%
0

1

2

3

4

Criterion F: Application of analytical and
evaluative skills appropriate to the subject 4
points
 Examines finding and describing data patterns, trends and
relationships
 Critical analysis of a student’s own work should be included



A. 0
42%
B. 1
C. 2
D. 3
21% 21%
E. 4
0
8% 8%

1

2

3

4

Criterion G: Use of Language
Appropriate to the Subject 4 points
 Use of clear and precise language as well as terms that are
appropriate to the subject
 Define and use key terms and use terminology appropriate to the
subject
 Avoid sudden changes in style



A. 0 38%
B. 1 33%

C. 2
D. 3
19%
E. 4
10%

0%
0

1

2

3

4

Criterion H: Conclusion 2 Points

 Assesses relevance of conclusion to research question and
consistency with evidence presented
 Recommend a header for this section
 Good idea to restate the research question
 Make clear that conclusions presented are supported by evidence
from body
 Mention unresolved questions



A. 0 78%
B. 1
C. 2

13%
0 9%

1

2

Criterion I: Formal Presentation 4 points

 Assess the layout, organization, appearance, formal elements for
a consistent standard format
 Clear title page, table of contents, page numbers
 MLA style
 EASY points!!!


Criterion J: Abstract 2 points

 Does not exceed 300 words.
 Should examine development of EE argument and importance of
conclusions reached.
 Must clearly state:
• Research question
• Scope of investigation (how conducted)
• Conclusions reached
 Introduces reader (examiner) to entire scope of the EE.


Criterion K: Holistic Judgment 4 points

 Assesses qualities that distinguish an essay from average –
intellectual initiative, depth of understanding and insight
 References to unexpected ideas
 Showing connections between unrelated facts
 Using a novel approach to finding information


Academic Honesty

 Student is ultimately responsible
 Work or ideas of others must be fully and correctly acknowledged
 Supervisor confirms that the EE submitted is the authentic work of
the student
 Both plagiarism and collusion are forms of malpractice
 Same piece of work, or two versions of same, cannot be
submitted by student


Using ManageBac to stay organized!

 www.norcrosshigh.managebac.com


Extended Essay Assessment Criteria

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Extended Essay Assessment Criteria

Similar to Extended Essay Assessment Criteria (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Extended Essay Assessment Criteria

Editor's Notes