SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Example 1: Classify the soil samples shown below using AASHTO and
USCS Systems:
Soil, % passing
Sieve No. A B C
4 - - 69.3
10 68.5 79.5 59.1
20 - - 48.3
40 36.1 69.0 38.5
60 - - 28.4
100 - - 19.8
200 21.9 54.3 4.5
LL 34.1 53.5 Non-plastic
(NP)PL 16.5 31.6
Solution: 1) AASHTO System:
Classifying Soil A
1. compute PI, PI=LL-PL=34.1-16.5=17.6
2. Since 21.9 % passes the No. 200 sieve, the soil is an A-2 with
subgroup to be determined from PI and LL.
3. proceeding across AASHTO table from left to right with
LL=34.1<40 and PI=17.6>11
the first soil which satisfies these criteria is an A-2-6 soil.
4. next compute the GI, because the soil is A-2-6, then
GI=0.01(F-15)(PI-10)=0.01(21.6-15)(17.6-10)=0.52
rounding to the nearest whole number, obtain GI=1
Therefore the final classification of soil is A-2-6(1)
Classifying Soil B
1. The PI is, PI= 53.5- 31.6 = 21.9, therefore, 11 minimum controls.
2. The percent passing sieve No. 200 is 54.3 > 35, therefore, the soil is
an
A-4, A-5, A-6 or A-7.
3. With LL = 53.5 and PI = 21.9 the soil is an A-7, but we must still find
if it is an A-7-5 or A-7-6.
4. For LL = 53.5
PI = 53.5 – 30 = 23.5 > 21.9, therefore the soil is A-7-5.
5. Compute the G.I.
GI = (F200-35)[0.2+0.005(LL-40)]+0.01(F200-15)(PI-10)
= (54.3-35)[0.2+0.005(53.5-40]+0.01(54.3-15)(21.9-10)
=9.84, use 10
6. The final classification of the soil B is: A-7-5(10)
Classifying Soil C
The soil is either A-1 or A-3.with the percent passing the sieve No. 40 of
38.5 < 51, but 38.5 > 30, the soil must be A-1-b.
There is no group index for this soil.
The final classification of the soil C is A-1-b
Solution: 2) USCS System:
Classifying Soil A
1. we have 21.9<50 % passing the No. 200 sieve and more than 50%
passing the No. 4 sieve (since 68.5 % passed the No. 10) therefore, the
soil is either SM or SC
2. based on LL of 34.1 and PI=34.1-16.5=17.6, we obtained the
coordinates on the plasticity chart that the soil is a CL. Taking C for
"clay" the soil is classified as , SC
Classifying Soil B
a) Since 54.3% passes the No. 200 sieve, the soil is immediately fine-
grained and is MH, OH, or CH because the LL = 53.5 > 50 percent.
b) From the plasticity chart at LL = 53.5 and PI = 21.9, the soil
coordinates are difficult to read so we will compute PI = 0.73(LL-20)
= 0.73(53.5-20) = 24.4 > 21.9 therefore, the soil is an MH from the
coordinate location.
Classifying Soil C
a) with 4.5 % passing the No. 200 sieve, soil is either GW, GP, SW, SP
b) it will be necessary to plot a grain size distribution curve and obtained
D60=2.00 mm
D30=0.29 mm
D10=0.086 mm
To compute
Cu=2/0.086=23.3 > 6
Cc=0.292
/(2*0.086)=0.5 < 1 (not between 1 and 3)
Since the gradation criteria are not met for well-graded, the soil is
poorly graded (P suffix)
c) with 95.5 % retained on the No. 200 sieve and with 69.3 % passing
the No. 4 sieve, the percent between the No. 4 and No. 200 is
69.3.4.5 = 64.8
% retained on No. 4 = 100-69.3 = 30.7
%passing No. 200 = 4.5
100 %
With 64.8 % as sand the soil is classified as, SP
Example: 2) Explain the engineering properties of SP-SM soil group
Solution:
1. The soil is poorly graded sand with slight silt.
2. The soil is coarse grained (i.e. less than 50% of the soil sample
was passed sieve No. 200).
3. The soil is sand that means more than 50% of the coarse
fraction was passed sieve No. 4.
4. Poorly graded means that cu or cc or both of them not meet the
specifications.
5. The soil is carry double symbol SP-SM means that the percent
passing No. 200 sieve is between 5-12%.
6. The soil is located below the A-line of plasticity chart because
the soil is content silt.
Example: 3) Classify the soil according to the USCS and determine
percentage of gravel and sand fraction.
% passing sieve No. 4 = 86 %, D10 (mm) = 0.1, D60 (mm) = 0.9
% passing sieve No. 200 = 12 %, D30 (mm) = 0.32, PL = 26 %, PI = 10 %
Solution:
Less than 50 % of the soil sample is passed sieve No. 200; therefore the soil
is coarse-grained (G or S). And more than 50 % of the coarse fraction passed
sieve No. 4 therefore, the soil is sand (S).
69
0.1
0.9
D
D
c
10
60
u >=== ,
( ) 14.1
0.1*0.9
32.0
DD
D
c
2
1060
30
2
c === between 1 and 3
Therefore the soil is W
% passing sieve No. 4 = 86 %, therefore, the % gravel = 14 %
% passing sieve No. 200 = 12 %, the soil requires dual symbols SW-SM,
SW-SC, SP-SM, or SP-SC
LL = PL + PI = 26 + 10 = 36%, from plasticity chart the soil is located
below A-line, therefore the final soil classification is SW-SM
Example: 4) Ninety-five percent of a soil passes through the No. 200 sieve
and has a LL = 60 % and PL = 20 %. Classify the soil by AASHTO System.
Solution:
PI = 60-20 = 40 %
Passing sieve No. 200 = 95 %
Therefore, the soil is A-7
For A-7-5, PI ≤ LL-30 = 40-30 = 10 not correct
For A-7-6, PI > LL-30 = 40-30 = 10 correct
Therefore the soil classified as A-7-6, hence
GI = (F200-35) [0.2+0.005(LL-40)] +0.01(F200-15) (PI-10)
= (95-35) [0.2+0.005(60-40)] +0.01(95-15) (40-10)
= 42
So, the final soil classification is A-7-6(42)
Example: 5) Classify the following soil using AASHTO system.
% passing sieve # 10 = 100% LL = 30 %
sieve # 40 = 80% PL = 20 %
sieve # 200 = 58%
Solution:
1. PI = 30 – 20 = 10 %
2. % passing sieve # 200 > 35, therefore the soil is A-4, A-5, A-6 or A-7.
3. LL = 30 % and PI = 10%, therefore the soil is A-4.
4. GI = (F200-35) [0.2+0.005(LL-40)] +0.01(F200-15) (PI-10)
= (58-35) [0.2+0.005(30-40)] +0.01(58-15) (10-10)
= 3.45 round to (3.0)
Therefore the final soil classification is A-4 (3).
Example: 6) For, a soil specimen, given the following
% passing sieve # 4 = 92% sieve # 10 = 81%
sieve # 40 = 78% sieve # 200 = 65%
LL = 48 % PI = 32 %
Classify the soil by AASHTO and USCS .
Solution: A. AASHTO system
1. PI = 32 %
2. % passing sieve # 200 > 35, therefore the soil is A-4, A-5, A-6 or A-7.
3. LL = 48 % and PI = 32%, therefore the soil is A-7.
4. LL – 30 = 48 – 30 = 18 % < PI, therefore the soil is A-7-5.
5. GI = (F200-35) [0.2+0.005(LL-40)] +0.01(F200-15) (PI-10)
= (65-35) [0.2+0.005(48-40)] +0.01(65-15) (32-10)
= 18.2 = 18
The final soil classification is A-7-6 (18).
B. USCS
Since more than 50% of the soil sample passing through a sieve #
200, it is a fine-grained soil, i.e., it could be ML, CL, MH, or CH. Now, if
we plot LL=48 and PI=32 on the plasticity chart, it falls in the zone CL. So
the soil is classified as CL.
Example: 7) Using AASHTO system classify the soil with properties of
% passing sieve # 4 = 79% LL = 35 %
sieve # 200 = 24% PL = 27 %
Solution:
Because the % passing sieve # 200< 35, therefore the soil either
A-1, A-2, or A-3
From sieve analysis the A-1a and A-3 are canceled.
From atterberg's limits PI = 35 – 27 = 8 > 6, therefore A-1b also is canceled
LL = 35%, therefore A-2-5 and A-2-7 are canceled
PI = 8 < 11, therefore A-2-6 canceled also. Then the soil is A-2-4
For A-2 the GI = 0, therefore
The final soil classification is A-2-4(0)
Example: 8) Explain the engineering properties of soil CL.
Solution:
1. Clay soil with low plasticity
2. More than 50% of soil sample passes sieve #200
3. it is located above the A-line from the plasticity chart
4. Low plasticity means that the LL is less than 50%.
Example: 9) classify the soil using USCS
Sieve # 1 in 3/4 1/2 4 10 40 200
Size, mm 25.4 19.05 12.7 4.75 2 0.42 0.075
% passing 100 90 70 60 30 10 7
LL = 45% and PL = 33%
Solution:
Less than 50% of the soil passes sieve #200, then it is coarse
grained
Gravel = 100 – 60 = 40%
Sand = 60 – 7 = 53%
Sand > gravel, therefore the soil is sand (S)
7% is between 5 – 12%, therefore use double symbols
SW-SM, SW-SC, or SP-SM, SP-SC
From soil distribution curve
611.31
0.42
4.75
D
D
c
10
60
u >===
( ) 005.2
0.42*4.75
2
DD
D
c
2
1060
30
2
c === between 1 and 3
Therefore, SW-SM or SW-SC
From plasticity chart with LL = 45 and PI = 45-33 = 12, the point is located
below A-line, therefore is M
The final classification of the soil is SW-SM
Example: 10)
Classify the following soil using USCS
% passing sieve # 4 = 70% LL = 30 %
sieve # 200 = 30% PL = 18 %
Solution:
1. F200 = 30 % < 50% , therefore the soil is coarse grained soil (gravel or
sand)
2. Sand fraction = 70 – 30 = 40% > gravel fraction 100 – 70 =30%,
therefore the soil is sand (S).
3. More than 12% of the soil passes sieve # 200, the soil is either SM or
SC
4. From plasticity chart with LL=30% and PI=12%, the soil is located
above the A-line, therefore the symbol is C
5. The final classification of the soil is SC (Clayey sand with gravel)
Example: 11)
Classify the following soil using USCS
% passing sieve # 4 = 100% LL = 55 %
sieve # 200 = 86% PL = 27 %
Solution:
1. F200 = 86 % > 50% , therefore the soil is fine grained soil (clay or silt)
2. From plasticity chart with LL=55% and PI=28%, the soil is
located above the A-line, therefore the group symbol is CH (clay with
high plasticity)
(inorganic clay) or (fat clay).
Example: 12)
Classify the following soil using USCS and AASHTO.
% passing sieve # 4 = 71% LL = 41 %
sieve # 200 = 43% PL = 27 %
Solution: A. AASHTO system
1. PI = 41 – 27 =14 %
2. % passing sieve # 200 > 35, therefore the soil is A-4, A-5, A-6
or A-7.
3. LL = 41 % and PI = 14%, therefore the soil is A-7.
4. LL – 30 = 41 – 30 = 11 % < PI, therefore the soil is A-7-5.
5. GI = (F200-35) [0.2+0.005(LL-40)] +0.01(F200-15) (PI-10)
= (43-35) [0.2+0.005(41-40)] +0.01(43-15) (14-10)
= 2.76 = 3
The final soil classification is A-7-6 (3).
B. USCS
1. F200 = 43 % < 50% , therefore the soil is coarse grained soil
(gravel or sand)
2. Gravel fraction = 100 – 71 = 29% > Sand fraction 71 – 43
=28%, therefore the soil is sand (G).
3. More than 12% of the soil passes sieve # 200, the soil is either
GM or GC
4. From plasticity chart with LL=41% and PI=14%, the soil is
located below the A-line, therefore the symbol is M.
5. Therefore the final soil classification is GM.

More Related Content

What's hot

300 solved-problems
300 solved-problems300 solved-problems
300 solved-problems
MD.Yeasin Mostafiz
 
Liquid limit &amp; plastic limit test
Liquid limit &amp; plastic limit testLiquid limit &amp; plastic limit test
Liquid limit &amp; plastic limit test
Raz Azad
 
Examples on seepage
Examples on seepageExamples on seepage
Examples on seepage
Malika khalil
 
Shrinkage Limit Test
Shrinkage Limit TestShrinkage Limit Test
Shrinkage Limit Test
SOURABH PAL
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #7: Sieve Analysis-2]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #7: Sieve Analysis-2]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #7: Sieve Analysis-2]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #7: Sieve Analysis-2]
Muhammad Irfan
 
Examples on stress distribution
Examples on stress distributionExamples on stress distribution
Examples on stress distribution
Malika khalil
 
Square footing design
Square footing designSquare footing design
Square footing design
Southern University Bangladesh
 
Homework 1 (solution )
Homework 1 (solution )Homework 1 (solution )
Homework 1 (solution )
Dr.Abdulmannan Orabi
 
Lecture 7 stress distribution in soil
Lecture 7 stress distribution in soilLecture 7 stress distribution in soil
Lecture 7 stress distribution in soil
Dr.Abdulmannan Orabi
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]
Muhammad Irfan
 
Load carrying capacity of piles
Load carrying capacity of pilesLoad carrying capacity of piles
Load carrying capacity of piles
Latif Hyder Wadho
 
Flexural design of beam...PRC-I
Flexural design of beam...PRC-IFlexural design of beam...PRC-I
Flexural design of beam...PRC-I
Irfan Malik
 
Sieve analysis of coarse and fine aggregate - Report
Sieve analysis of coarse and fine aggregate - ReportSieve analysis of coarse and fine aggregate - Report
Sieve analysis of coarse and fine aggregate - Report
Sarchia Khursheed
 
Geotech lab 1
Geotech lab 1Geotech lab 1
Geotech lab 1
Islacom Catanduanes
 
Structural Analysis (Solutions) Chapter 9 by Wajahat
Structural Analysis (Solutions) Chapter 9 by WajahatStructural Analysis (Solutions) Chapter 9 by Wajahat
Structural Analysis (Solutions) Chapter 9 by Wajahat
Wajahat Ullah
 
Lec06 Analysis and Design of T Beams (Reinforced Concrete Design I & Prof. Ab...
Lec06 Analysis and Design of T Beams (Reinforced Concrete Design I & Prof. Ab...Lec06 Analysis and Design of T Beams (Reinforced Concrete Design I & Prof. Ab...
Lec06 Analysis and Design of T Beams (Reinforced Concrete Design I & Prof. Ab...
Hossam Shafiq II
 
Specific Gravity & Absorption of Aggregate (Coarse & Fine) | Jameel Academy
Specific Gravity & Absorption of Aggregate (Coarse & Fine) | Jameel AcademySpecific Gravity & Absorption of Aggregate (Coarse & Fine) | Jameel Academy
Specific Gravity & Absorption of Aggregate (Coarse & Fine) | Jameel Academy
Jameel Academy
 
Class 7 Consolidation Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 7    Consolidation Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )Class 7    Consolidation Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 7 Consolidation Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Hossam Shafiq I
 
Influence lines (structural analysis theories)
Influence lines (structural analysis theories)Influence lines (structural analysis theories)
Influence lines (structural analysis theories)
Madujith Sagara
 

What's hot (20)

300 solved-problems
300 solved-problems300 solved-problems
300 solved-problems
 
Liquid limit &amp; plastic limit test
Liquid limit &amp; plastic limit testLiquid limit &amp; plastic limit test
Liquid limit &amp; plastic limit test
 
Examples on seepage
Examples on seepageExamples on seepage
Examples on seepage
 
Shrinkage Limit Test
Shrinkage Limit TestShrinkage Limit Test
Shrinkage Limit Test
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #7: Sieve Analysis-2]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #7: Sieve Analysis-2]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #7: Sieve Analysis-2]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #7: Sieve Analysis-2]
 
Examples on stress distribution
Examples on stress distributionExamples on stress distribution
Examples on stress distribution
 
Square footing design
Square footing designSquare footing design
Square footing design
 
Homework 1 (solution )
Homework 1 (solution )Homework 1 (solution )
Homework 1 (solution )
 
Lecture 7 stress distribution in soil
Lecture 7 stress distribution in soilLecture 7 stress distribution in soil
Lecture 7 stress distribution in soil
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]
 
Load carrying capacity of piles
Load carrying capacity of pilesLoad carrying capacity of piles
Load carrying capacity of piles
 
Flexural design of beam...PRC-I
Flexural design of beam...PRC-IFlexural design of beam...PRC-I
Flexural design of beam...PRC-I
 
Sieve analysis of coarse and fine aggregate - Report
Sieve analysis of coarse and fine aggregate - ReportSieve analysis of coarse and fine aggregate - Report
Sieve analysis of coarse and fine aggregate - Report
 
Vertical Curves (Part 1)
Vertical Curves (Part 1)Vertical Curves (Part 1)
Vertical Curves (Part 1)
 
Geotech lab 1
Geotech lab 1Geotech lab 1
Geotech lab 1
 
Structural Analysis (Solutions) Chapter 9 by Wajahat
Structural Analysis (Solutions) Chapter 9 by WajahatStructural Analysis (Solutions) Chapter 9 by Wajahat
Structural Analysis (Solutions) Chapter 9 by Wajahat
 
Lec06 Analysis and Design of T Beams (Reinforced Concrete Design I & Prof. Ab...
Lec06 Analysis and Design of T Beams (Reinforced Concrete Design I & Prof. Ab...Lec06 Analysis and Design of T Beams (Reinforced Concrete Design I & Prof. Ab...
Lec06 Analysis and Design of T Beams (Reinforced Concrete Design I & Prof. Ab...
 
Specific Gravity & Absorption of Aggregate (Coarse & Fine) | Jameel Academy
Specific Gravity & Absorption of Aggregate (Coarse & Fine) | Jameel AcademySpecific Gravity & Absorption of Aggregate (Coarse & Fine) | Jameel Academy
Specific Gravity & Absorption of Aggregate (Coarse & Fine) | Jameel Academy
 
Class 7 Consolidation Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 7    Consolidation Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )Class 7    Consolidation Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 7 Consolidation Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
 
Influence lines (structural analysis theories)
Influence lines (structural analysis theories)Influence lines (structural analysis theories)
Influence lines (structural analysis theories)
 

More from Malika khalil

Spot speed studies.ppt .mylan nejyar
Spot speed studies.ppt .mylan nejyarSpot speed studies.ppt .mylan nejyar
Spot speed studies.ppt .mylan nejyar
Malika khalil
 
Design of two way slabs(d.d.m.)
Design of two way slabs(d.d.m.)Design of two way slabs(d.d.m.)
Design of two way slabs(d.d.m.)
Malika khalil
 
Twri3 a5
Twri3 a5Twri3 a5
Twri3 a5
Malika khalil
 
Ch.1 fluid dynamic
Ch.1 fluid dynamicCh.1 fluid dynamic
Ch.1 fluid dynamic
Malika khalil
 
Chap 26 isometric drawing
Chap 26 isometric drawingChap 26 isometric drawing
Chap 26 isometric drawing
Malika khalil
 
Simple formulas excel
Simple formulas excelSimple formulas excel
Simple formulas excel
Malika khalil
 
Cash flow using excel
Cash flow using excelCash flow using excel
Cash flow using excel
Malika khalil
 
Examples on effective stress
Examples on effective stressExamples on effective stress
Examples on effective stress
Malika khalil
 
1 reinforced concrete lectures-t-beam2
1 reinforced concrete lectures-t-beam21 reinforced concrete lectures-t-beam2
1 reinforced concrete lectures-t-beam2
Malika khalil
 
4 pages from matlab an introduction with app.-2
4 pages from matlab an introduction with app.-24 pages from matlab an introduction with app.-2
4 pages from matlab an introduction with app.-2
Malika khalil
 
Design of column trail and error example
Design of column trail and error exampleDesign of column trail and error example
Design of column trail and error example
Malika khalil
 
Design of one way slab exampe
Design of one way slab exampeDesign of one way slab exampe
Design of one way slab exampe
Malika khalil
 
Phase relations soil analysis
Phase relations soil analysisPhase relations soil analysis
Phase relations soil analysis
Malika khalil
 
Lec 4 solids environment
Lec 4 solids environmentLec 4 solids environment
Lec 4 solids environment
Malika khalil
 

More from Malika khalil (14)

Spot speed studies.ppt .mylan nejyar
Spot speed studies.ppt .mylan nejyarSpot speed studies.ppt .mylan nejyar
Spot speed studies.ppt .mylan nejyar
 
Design of two way slabs(d.d.m.)
Design of two way slabs(d.d.m.)Design of two way slabs(d.d.m.)
Design of two way slabs(d.d.m.)
 
Twri3 a5
Twri3 a5Twri3 a5
Twri3 a5
 
Ch.1 fluid dynamic
Ch.1 fluid dynamicCh.1 fluid dynamic
Ch.1 fluid dynamic
 
Chap 26 isometric drawing
Chap 26 isometric drawingChap 26 isometric drawing
Chap 26 isometric drawing
 
Simple formulas excel
Simple formulas excelSimple formulas excel
Simple formulas excel
 
Cash flow using excel
Cash flow using excelCash flow using excel
Cash flow using excel
 
Examples on effective stress
Examples on effective stressExamples on effective stress
Examples on effective stress
 
1 reinforced concrete lectures-t-beam2
1 reinforced concrete lectures-t-beam21 reinforced concrete lectures-t-beam2
1 reinforced concrete lectures-t-beam2
 
4 pages from matlab an introduction with app.-2
4 pages from matlab an introduction with app.-24 pages from matlab an introduction with app.-2
4 pages from matlab an introduction with app.-2
 
Design of column trail and error example
Design of column trail and error exampleDesign of column trail and error example
Design of column trail and error example
 
Design of one way slab exampe
Design of one way slab exampeDesign of one way slab exampe
Design of one way slab exampe
 
Phase relations soil analysis
Phase relations soil analysisPhase relations soil analysis
Phase relations soil analysis
 
Lec 4 solids environment
Lec 4 solids environmentLec 4 solids environment
Lec 4 solids environment
 

Recently uploaded

J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdfJ.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
MLILAB
 
block diagram and signal flow graph representation
block diagram and signal flow graph representationblock diagram and signal flow graph representation
block diagram and signal flow graph representation
Divya Somashekar
 
一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙菲莎大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙菲莎大学毕业证成绩单如何办理一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙菲莎大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙菲莎大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
bakpo1
 
Top 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdf
Top 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdfTop 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdf
Top 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdf
Teleport Manpower Consultant
 
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and servicesPlanning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
JoytuBarua2
 
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)
MdTanvirMahtab2
 
在线办理(ANU毕业证书)澳洲国立大学毕业证录取通知书一模一样
在线办理(ANU毕业证书)澳洲国立大学毕业证录取通知书一模一样在线办理(ANU毕业证书)澳洲国立大学毕业证录取通知书一模一样
在线办理(ANU毕业证书)澳洲国立大学毕业证录取通知书一模一样
obonagu
 
TECHNICAL TRAINING MANUAL GENERAL FAMILIARIZATION COURSE
TECHNICAL TRAINING MANUAL   GENERAL FAMILIARIZATION COURSETECHNICAL TRAINING MANUAL   GENERAL FAMILIARIZATION COURSE
TECHNICAL TRAINING MANUAL GENERAL FAMILIARIZATION COURSE
DuvanRamosGarzon1
 
Forklift Classes Overview by Intella Parts
Forklift Classes Overview by Intella PartsForklift Classes Overview by Intella Parts
Forklift Classes Overview by Intella Parts
Intella Parts
 
ASME IX(9) 2007 Full Version .pdf
ASME IX(9)  2007 Full Version       .pdfASME IX(9)  2007 Full Version       .pdf
ASME IX(9) 2007 Full Version .pdf
AhmedHussein950959
 
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
AafreenAbuthahir2
 
DESIGN A COTTON SEED SEPARATION MACHINE.docx
DESIGN A COTTON SEED SEPARATION MACHINE.docxDESIGN A COTTON SEED SEPARATION MACHINE.docx
DESIGN A COTTON SEED SEPARATION MACHINE.docx
FluxPrime1
 
Nuclear Power Economics and Structuring 2024
Nuclear Power Economics and Structuring 2024Nuclear Power Economics and Structuring 2024
Nuclear Power Economics and Structuring 2024
Massimo Talia
 
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdfThe Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
Pipe Restoration Solutions
 
COLLEGE BUS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT REPORT.pdf
COLLEGE BUS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT REPORT.pdfCOLLEGE BUS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT REPORT.pdf
COLLEGE BUS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT REPORT.pdf
Kamal Acharya
 
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
PrashantGoswami42
 
addressing modes in computer architecture
addressing modes  in computer architectureaddressing modes  in computer architecture
addressing modes in computer architecture
ShahidSultan24
 
Gen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdf
Gen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdfGen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdf
Gen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdf
gdsczhcet
 
road safety engineering r s e unit 3.pdf
road safety engineering  r s e unit 3.pdfroad safety engineering  r s e unit 3.pdf
road safety engineering r s e unit 3.pdf
VENKATESHvenky89705
 
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdfFinal project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Kamal Acharya
 

Recently uploaded (20)

J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdfJ.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
 
block diagram and signal flow graph representation
block diagram and signal flow graph representationblock diagram and signal flow graph representation
block diagram and signal flow graph representation
 
一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙菲莎大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙菲莎大学毕业证成绩单如何办理一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙菲莎大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙菲莎大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
 
Top 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdf
Top 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdfTop 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdf
Top 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdf
 
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and servicesPlanning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
 
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)
 
在线办理(ANU毕业证书)澳洲国立大学毕业证录取通知书一模一样
在线办理(ANU毕业证书)澳洲国立大学毕业证录取通知书一模一样在线办理(ANU毕业证书)澳洲国立大学毕业证录取通知书一模一样
在线办理(ANU毕业证书)澳洲国立大学毕业证录取通知书一模一样
 
TECHNICAL TRAINING MANUAL GENERAL FAMILIARIZATION COURSE
TECHNICAL TRAINING MANUAL   GENERAL FAMILIARIZATION COURSETECHNICAL TRAINING MANUAL   GENERAL FAMILIARIZATION COURSE
TECHNICAL TRAINING MANUAL GENERAL FAMILIARIZATION COURSE
 
Forklift Classes Overview by Intella Parts
Forklift Classes Overview by Intella PartsForklift Classes Overview by Intella Parts
Forklift Classes Overview by Intella Parts
 
ASME IX(9) 2007 Full Version .pdf
ASME IX(9)  2007 Full Version       .pdfASME IX(9)  2007 Full Version       .pdf
ASME IX(9) 2007 Full Version .pdf
 
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
 
DESIGN A COTTON SEED SEPARATION MACHINE.docx
DESIGN A COTTON SEED SEPARATION MACHINE.docxDESIGN A COTTON SEED SEPARATION MACHINE.docx
DESIGN A COTTON SEED SEPARATION MACHINE.docx
 
Nuclear Power Economics and Structuring 2024
Nuclear Power Economics and Structuring 2024Nuclear Power Economics and Structuring 2024
Nuclear Power Economics and Structuring 2024
 
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdfThe Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
 
COLLEGE BUS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT REPORT.pdf
COLLEGE BUS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT REPORT.pdfCOLLEGE BUS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT REPORT.pdf
COLLEGE BUS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT REPORT.pdf
 
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
 
addressing modes in computer architecture
addressing modes  in computer architectureaddressing modes  in computer architecture
addressing modes in computer architecture
 
Gen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdf
Gen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdfGen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdf
Gen AI Study Jams _ For the GDSC Leads in India.pdf
 
road safety engineering r s e unit 3.pdf
road safety engineering  r s e unit 3.pdfroad safety engineering  r s e unit 3.pdf
road safety engineering r s e unit 3.pdf
 
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdfFinal project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdf
 

Examples on soil classification

  • 1. Example 1: Classify the soil samples shown below using AASHTO and USCS Systems: Soil, % passing Sieve No. A B C 4 - - 69.3 10 68.5 79.5 59.1 20 - - 48.3 40 36.1 69.0 38.5 60 - - 28.4 100 - - 19.8 200 21.9 54.3 4.5 LL 34.1 53.5 Non-plastic (NP)PL 16.5 31.6 Solution: 1) AASHTO System: Classifying Soil A 1. compute PI, PI=LL-PL=34.1-16.5=17.6 2. Since 21.9 % passes the No. 200 sieve, the soil is an A-2 with subgroup to be determined from PI and LL. 3. proceeding across AASHTO table from left to right with LL=34.1<40 and PI=17.6>11 the first soil which satisfies these criteria is an A-2-6 soil. 4. next compute the GI, because the soil is A-2-6, then GI=0.01(F-15)(PI-10)=0.01(21.6-15)(17.6-10)=0.52 rounding to the nearest whole number, obtain GI=1 Therefore the final classification of soil is A-2-6(1) Classifying Soil B 1. The PI is, PI= 53.5- 31.6 = 21.9, therefore, 11 minimum controls. 2. The percent passing sieve No. 200 is 54.3 > 35, therefore, the soil is an A-4, A-5, A-6 or A-7. 3. With LL = 53.5 and PI = 21.9 the soil is an A-7, but we must still find if it is an A-7-5 or A-7-6. 4. For LL = 53.5 PI = 53.5 – 30 = 23.5 > 21.9, therefore the soil is A-7-5. 5. Compute the G.I.
  • 2. GI = (F200-35)[0.2+0.005(LL-40)]+0.01(F200-15)(PI-10) = (54.3-35)[0.2+0.005(53.5-40]+0.01(54.3-15)(21.9-10) =9.84, use 10 6. The final classification of the soil B is: A-7-5(10) Classifying Soil C The soil is either A-1 or A-3.with the percent passing the sieve No. 40 of 38.5 < 51, but 38.5 > 30, the soil must be A-1-b. There is no group index for this soil. The final classification of the soil C is A-1-b Solution: 2) USCS System: Classifying Soil A 1. we have 21.9<50 % passing the No. 200 sieve and more than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve (since 68.5 % passed the No. 10) therefore, the soil is either SM or SC 2. based on LL of 34.1 and PI=34.1-16.5=17.6, we obtained the coordinates on the plasticity chart that the soil is a CL. Taking C for "clay" the soil is classified as , SC Classifying Soil B a) Since 54.3% passes the No. 200 sieve, the soil is immediately fine- grained and is MH, OH, or CH because the LL = 53.5 > 50 percent. b) From the plasticity chart at LL = 53.5 and PI = 21.9, the soil coordinates are difficult to read so we will compute PI = 0.73(LL-20) = 0.73(53.5-20) = 24.4 > 21.9 therefore, the soil is an MH from the coordinate location. Classifying Soil C a) with 4.5 % passing the No. 200 sieve, soil is either GW, GP, SW, SP b) it will be necessary to plot a grain size distribution curve and obtained D60=2.00 mm D30=0.29 mm D10=0.086 mm To compute Cu=2/0.086=23.3 > 6 Cc=0.292 /(2*0.086)=0.5 < 1 (not between 1 and 3) Since the gradation criteria are not met for well-graded, the soil is poorly graded (P suffix)
  • 3. c) with 95.5 % retained on the No. 200 sieve and with 69.3 % passing the No. 4 sieve, the percent between the No. 4 and No. 200 is 69.3.4.5 = 64.8 % retained on No. 4 = 100-69.3 = 30.7 %passing No. 200 = 4.5 100 % With 64.8 % as sand the soil is classified as, SP Example: 2) Explain the engineering properties of SP-SM soil group Solution: 1. The soil is poorly graded sand with slight silt. 2. The soil is coarse grained (i.e. less than 50% of the soil sample was passed sieve No. 200). 3. The soil is sand that means more than 50% of the coarse fraction was passed sieve No. 4. 4. Poorly graded means that cu or cc or both of them not meet the specifications. 5. The soil is carry double symbol SP-SM means that the percent passing No. 200 sieve is between 5-12%. 6. The soil is located below the A-line of plasticity chart because the soil is content silt. Example: 3) Classify the soil according to the USCS and determine percentage of gravel and sand fraction. % passing sieve No. 4 = 86 %, D10 (mm) = 0.1, D60 (mm) = 0.9 % passing sieve No. 200 = 12 %, D30 (mm) = 0.32, PL = 26 %, PI = 10 % Solution: Less than 50 % of the soil sample is passed sieve No. 200; therefore the soil is coarse-grained (G or S). And more than 50 % of the coarse fraction passed sieve No. 4 therefore, the soil is sand (S). 69 0.1 0.9 D D c 10 60 u >=== , ( ) 14.1 0.1*0.9 32.0 DD D c 2 1060 30 2 c === between 1 and 3 Therefore the soil is W % passing sieve No. 4 = 86 %, therefore, the % gravel = 14 % % passing sieve No. 200 = 12 %, the soil requires dual symbols SW-SM, SW-SC, SP-SM, or SP-SC LL = PL + PI = 26 + 10 = 36%, from plasticity chart the soil is located below A-line, therefore the final soil classification is SW-SM
  • 4. Example: 4) Ninety-five percent of a soil passes through the No. 200 sieve and has a LL = 60 % and PL = 20 %. Classify the soil by AASHTO System. Solution: PI = 60-20 = 40 % Passing sieve No. 200 = 95 % Therefore, the soil is A-7 For A-7-5, PI ≤ LL-30 = 40-30 = 10 not correct For A-7-6, PI > LL-30 = 40-30 = 10 correct Therefore the soil classified as A-7-6, hence GI = (F200-35) [0.2+0.005(LL-40)] +0.01(F200-15) (PI-10) = (95-35) [0.2+0.005(60-40)] +0.01(95-15) (40-10) = 42 So, the final soil classification is A-7-6(42) Example: 5) Classify the following soil using AASHTO system. % passing sieve # 10 = 100% LL = 30 % sieve # 40 = 80% PL = 20 % sieve # 200 = 58% Solution: 1. PI = 30 – 20 = 10 % 2. % passing sieve # 200 > 35, therefore the soil is A-4, A-5, A-6 or A-7. 3. LL = 30 % and PI = 10%, therefore the soil is A-4. 4. GI = (F200-35) [0.2+0.005(LL-40)] +0.01(F200-15) (PI-10) = (58-35) [0.2+0.005(30-40)] +0.01(58-15) (10-10) = 3.45 round to (3.0) Therefore the final soil classification is A-4 (3). Example: 6) For, a soil specimen, given the following % passing sieve # 4 = 92% sieve # 10 = 81% sieve # 40 = 78% sieve # 200 = 65% LL = 48 % PI = 32 % Classify the soil by AASHTO and USCS . Solution: A. AASHTO system 1. PI = 32 % 2. % passing sieve # 200 > 35, therefore the soil is A-4, A-5, A-6 or A-7. 3. LL = 48 % and PI = 32%, therefore the soil is A-7. 4. LL – 30 = 48 – 30 = 18 % < PI, therefore the soil is A-7-5. 5. GI = (F200-35) [0.2+0.005(LL-40)] +0.01(F200-15) (PI-10) = (65-35) [0.2+0.005(48-40)] +0.01(65-15) (32-10)
  • 5. = 18.2 = 18 The final soil classification is A-7-6 (18). B. USCS Since more than 50% of the soil sample passing through a sieve # 200, it is a fine-grained soil, i.e., it could be ML, CL, MH, or CH. Now, if we plot LL=48 and PI=32 on the plasticity chart, it falls in the zone CL. So the soil is classified as CL. Example: 7) Using AASHTO system classify the soil with properties of % passing sieve # 4 = 79% LL = 35 % sieve # 200 = 24% PL = 27 % Solution: Because the % passing sieve # 200< 35, therefore the soil either A-1, A-2, or A-3 From sieve analysis the A-1a and A-3 are canceled. From atterberg's limits PI = 35 – 27 = 8 > 6, therefore A-1b also is canceled LL = 35%, therefore A-2-5 and A-2-7 are canceled PI = 8 < 11, therefore A-2-6 canceled also. Then the soil is A-2-4 For A-2 the GI = 0, therefore The final soil classification is A-2-4(0) Example: 8) Explain the engineering properties of soil CL. Solution: 1. Clay soil with low plasticity 2. More than 50% of soil sample passes sieve #200 3. it is located above the A-line from the plasticity chart 4. Low plasticity means that the LL is less than 50%. Example: 9) classify the soil using USCS Sieve # 1 in 3/4 1/2 4 10 40 200 Size, mm 25.4 19.05 12.7 4.75 2 0.42 0.075 % passing 100 90 70 60 30 10 7 LL = 45% and PL = 33% Solution: Less than 50% of the soil passes sieve #200, then it is coarse grained Gravel = 100 – 60 = 40% Sand = 60 – 7 = 53% Sand > gravel, therefore the soil is sand (S)
  • 6. 7% is between 5 – 12%, therefore use double symbols SW-SM, SW-SC, or SP-SM, SP-SC From soil distribution curve 611.31 0.42 4.75 D D c 10 60 u >=== ( ) 005.2 0.42*4.75 2 DD D c 2 1060 30 2 c === between 1 and 3 Therefore, SW-SM or SW-SC From plasticity chart with LL = 45 and PI = 45-33 = 12, the point is located below A-line, therefore is M The final classification of the soil is SW-SM Example: 10) Classify the following soil using USCS % passing sieve # 4 = 70% LL = 30 % sieve # 200 = 30% PL = 18 % Solution: 1. F200 = 30 % < 50% , therefore the soil is coarse grained soil (gravel or sand) 2. Sand fraction = 70 – 30 = 40% > gravel fraction 100 – 70 =30%, therefore the soil is sand (S). 3. More than 12% of the soil passes sieve # 200, the soil is either SM or SC 4. From plasticity chart with LL=30% and PI=12%, the soil is located above the A-line, therefore the symbol is C 5. The final classification of the soil is SC (Clayey sand with gravel) Example: 11) Classify the following soil using USCS % passing sieve # 4 = 100% LL = 55 % sieve # 200 = 86% PL = 27 % Solution: 1. F200 = 86 % > 50% , therefore the soil is fine grained soil (clay or silt) 2. From plasticity chart with LL=55% and PI=28%, the soil is located above the A-line, therefore the group symbol is CH (clay with high plasticity) (inorganic clay) or (fat clay).
  • 7. Example: 12) Classify the following soil using USCS and AASHTO. % passing sieve # 4 = 71% LL = 41 % sieve # 200 = 43% PL = 27 % Solution: A. AASHTO system 1. PI = 41 – 27 =14 % 2. % passing sieve # 200 > 35, therefore the soil is A-4, A-5, A-6 or A-7. 3. LL = 41 % and PI = 14%, therefore the soil is A-7. 4. LL – 30 = 41 – 30 = 11 % < PI, therefore the soil is A-7-5. 5. GI = (F200-35) [0.2+0.005(LL-40)] +0.01(F200-15) (PI-10) = (43-35) [0.2+0.005(41-40)] +0.01(43-15) (14-10) = 2.76 = 3 The final soil classification is A-7-6 (3). B. USCS 1. F200 = 43 % < 50% , therefore the soil is coarse grained soil (gravel or sand) 2. Gravel fraction = 100 – 71 = 29% > Sand fraction 71 – 43 =28%, therefore the soil is sand (G). 3. More than 12% of the soil passes sieve # 200, the soil is either GM or GC 4. From plasticity chart with LL=41% and PI=14%, the soil is located below the A-line, therefore the symbol is M. 5. Therefore the final soil classification is GM.