The document discusses the project cycle management (PCM) process for successfully managing an approved European project. It describes the five phases of the PCM: project idea, identification, formulation, implementation, and evaluation. It emphasizes that quality is ensured through stakeholder participation, use of tools like logical frameworks, and producing key documents. The document then outlines steps for after project approval like notifying partners, signing agreements, and organizing kickoff meetings. It provides guidance for managing partnerships through tasks, meetings, risk management and quality assurance surveys. Finally, it discusses monitoring, dissemination, sustainability, and reporting requirements throughout the project cycle.
2. The PCM
After the approval
Managing the partnership
Quality Assurance and monitoring
Dissemination and exploitation
Sustainability
Reporting
How to successfully manage an approved project
4. 1. Decision making criteria and procedures are defined at each phase (including key
information requirements and quality assessment criteria);
2. The phases in the cycle are progressive – each phase should be completed for the next
to be tackled with success;
3. New programming and project identification draws on the results of monitoring and
evaluation as part of a structured process of feedback and institutional learning.
The cycle is based on 3 principles
5. 1. projects are supportive of overarching policy objectives of the EC and of development
partners;
2. projects are relevant to an agreed strategy and to the real problems of target
groups/beneficiaries;
3. projects are feasible, meaning that objectives can be realistically achieved within the
constraints of the operating environment and capabilities of the implementing
agencies;
4. benefits generated by projects are likely to be sustainable.
PCM ensures that:
6. 1. Active participation of key stakeholders and aims to promote local ownership
2. Uses the Logical Framework Approach (as well as other tools) to support a number of
key assessments/analyses (including stakeholders, problems, objectives and strategies)
3. Incorporates key quality assessment criteria into each stage of the project cycle
4. Requires the production of good-quality key document(s) in each phase (with
commonly understood concepts and definitions), to support well-informed decision-
making
How PCM helps to reach the aims:
7. The quality of a project is measured in terms of relevance, feasibility and effectiveness. In the Quality Frame these three attributes are
subdivided into 16 criteria which are key for evaluating the quality. In each phase of the cycle, the project must be analyzed on these
quality criteria, so as to facilitate decision making
Quality criteria
8. Be transparent: notify the partners in due time
Sign the grant agreement
Alert the internal actors to get involved
Organize the kick off meeting
Prepare the consortium agreement
Open an internal project
Create a basic website
Agree on the platform to use for internal communnication
After the approval
9. Go through the application
Go through the financial provisions and regulations
Keep the minutes
Define roles and responsibilities
Ensure the participation of the whole organization
Define the operational plan
At the kick off meeting
11. Assign tasks to each partner to avoid sleeping partners
All partners active in each WP whenever possible
Plan regular consortium meetings and online meetings in between
Define risk management and mitigation measures
Organize internal QA surveys (anonymous)
Expect the unexpected
Managing the partnership
12. QA plan defined at early stage
Continuous monitoring of the LFM
Internal QA surveys
External mid-term and final evaluation
Multiplier/Open events with quality assessment
Monitoring
13. Dissemination plan defined at early stage
Planning of events
Website
Involvement of stakeholders
Project based multiplier effect
Dissemination and exploitation
14. Achieved results will keep being used
Tight link with dissemination and exploitation
External funding identified and available
Clustering projects
Sustainability
15. Final fase of the project
To be addressed already at early stage
Contents of the reports taken into account when deciding over the project documents
Project report vs Activity report
Don’t take anything for granted
All activities and produced results taken into account
Any deviation should be argumented (positive and negative)
The evaluators assess the project solely by comparing the proposal with the report
Reporting