2. Introduction
Importance
Manage and improve employees’
performance
Compensation
Training needs analysis
Make more valid staffing decisions
Enhance overall effectiveness of firm
3. Limitation of Performance
Appraisal
Efforts for short-term reward instead of long term
success of organization
Supervisors consider EPA as reward punishment
exercise, not on overall skills and potential of the
employees
Routine paperwork exercise rather than objective
critique of the individual’s performance
Individuals consider the exercise as biased or unfair
Subordinates react negatively when evaluators offer
unfavorable comments.
Personal biases and inconsistencies of the individual
conducting EPA may undermine the efficacy of the
entire exercise
4. What should be measured?
Worker or work performance
Performance outcomes
Example of instructor
Clear distinction between competencies and
performance
5. Appraisal System
Who devises an appraisal system
Measurement content
Measurement process
Rater
Ratee
Administrative characteristics
6. Measurement Content
Person
Work
Record of outcomes
Domino’s
Sheraton Hotel
Others
Important outcome categories
Quality, Quantity, Timeliness, Cost Effectiveness, Need
for supervision, Interpersonal Impact
7. Measurement Process
Comparison among ratees
Paired comparison
Straight ranking
Forced distribution (GE example)
Comparison among performance anchors
Pairs of behavior statements
Forced choice
10. Benchmarking
Gauging the internal practices and activities
with an external standard or reference
Shaping
1. Identify a benchmark
2. Identify comparables
3. Data on comparables
4. Internal data
5. Set specific targets
6. Train staff to meet targets
7. Feedback and reinforcement
8. Progress review