This document outlines a study on the impact of pedagogy training on teacher competencies at the senior secondary school level. It includes an introduction, definitions, objectives, analysis of teacher competencies, the need for the study, the study model and process, findings and conclusions. The paper focuses on problems with pedagogy training and its impact on developing teacher competencies. It advocates for the important role of pedagogy training in professional growth and meeting diverse teaching roles. The study aims to prepare a teaching effectiveness tool, identify the impact of experience and training on competencies, and analyze data collected from teachers.

1. Ms SHADMA PARVEEN
Associate Professor
Al-Falah University
shadmaparveen79@gmail.com
Cont. : 9990753704

2. “A Study of Impact of Pedagogy Training on
the Competency of Senior Secondary School
Teachers ”
EDUCARNIVAL 2016
8th International Conference on Excellence in School Education

3.  Introduction
 Definitions
 Objectives
 Competencies being a Teacher
 Need for Study
 Model
 Process
 Analysis & Interpretation
 Findings and Conclusions
 References

4.  The paper focuses on the problems and
issues of Pedagogy Training and its Impact
on competencies and competency
approaches in education…
 Gagne & Medsker, (1996). Samithikrai
(1999) and Bangmo (2001) advocated the
role of Pedagogy Training
“Destiny of a nation is determined in the
classroom”
 Stoll and Fink claims that nothing in
Educational system…………. professional
growth of their teachers.

5.  Teacher has assumed utmost important in
meeting the diverse roles
Roget's defines pedagogy
 "The act, process, or art of imparting
knowledge and skill.
 Operational definition of Competency
 Geraldo & Acuńa (2005), the word
“competence” drives from Latin word
“competere”
 McClelland (2006) was the first who
proposed the idea of competency
 World Bank paper on staff development
recommends, “a high
quality…………............. essential in
building excellence”
Faculty
Competence
Circle
Leader
Administrator
Educator
Counselor
ProblemSolver
Adviser
Memberof
variousactivities
Coordinator Organizer
Researcher
Editor
mentor
Evaluator
Guide
Consultant

6. Administrative, Management & Academic Leadership.
Emotional Stability, Interpersonal Relationship.
Teaching and Course Development.
Creativity and Innovativeness.
Problem Solving/ Decision Making.
Life Long Learning.

7.  Preparing the Teaching Effectiveness Tool.
 Identifying the impact of Experience on Teaching
Competencies.
 Identifying the impact of FDTs or Pedagogy
Trainings.

8.  Research Design
 Variables
 Tool for Research
 Statistical Methods
 Population
 Sources of Data Collection
 Sample
 Development of the Tool
 Demographic Data
 Writing of Teaching Competency Statements

12. [1] Spencer, L.M. and Spencer, S.M. (1993) Competence at Work: Models for Superior
Performance, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
[2] Heene, A. and Sanchez, R. (Eds.) (1997) Competence-Based Strategic Management,
Chichester: John Wiley and Sons
[3] Menges, Robert J., & Associates (1999). Faculty in new jobs. San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass.
[4] Becerra. (2000), “The role of artificial intelligence technologies in the
implementation of people-finder knowledge management systems. In Bringing
knowledge to business processes”. Workshop in the AAAI Spring Symposium
Series. Stanford.
[5] Braskamp, Larry A. (2000). “Toward a more holistic approach to assessing faculty as
teachers. In Katherine E .Ryan (Ed.), Evaluating teaching in higher education: A vision for
the future”. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Number 83. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.

13. [6] Austin, Ann E. (2002). “Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing new faculty to face
changing expectations in shifting context.” The Review of Higher Education, 26 (2),
119-144.
[7] Stenmark, D. (2003) ‘Knowledge creation and the web: Factors indicating why some
intranets succeed where others fail’. Knowledge and Process Management, pp. 207-
216.
[8] Berio G. (2005) ‘Knowledge Management for Competence Management’.
Proceedings of I- KNOW 05.
[9] Stenmark, D. and Lindgren R. (2006) ‘System Support for Knowledge Work: Bridging
the Knowing-Doing Gap’. International Journal of Knowledge Management, pp.46-68.
[10] Draganidis, F., Chamopoulou, P., Mentzas, G.(2006)‘An ontology based tool for
competency management and learning paths.’ 6th
International Conference on
Knowledge Management (I-KNOW 06).
[11] Ryan, Katherine E. (Ed.). (2003) “Evaluating teaching in higher education: A vision
for the future. New Directions for Teaching and Learning”, Number 83. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
[12] McClelland, M. (2003). Metadata standards for educational resources. IEEE
Computer, 36.(11), 107-109.