SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1
Dynamic Erosion Model and
Monitoring System (DEMIS) at the
National Scale in Turkey
Mehmet Ali Akdag
2
Dynamic Erosion Model and Monitoring
System (DEMIS) at the National Scale in
Turkey
Soil erosion is one of the most important means that
threatens the sustainable use of soil resources in the
catchments of Turkey (FAO and ITPS, 2015). Also, varying
with climate, soil, topography and land cover and
management, sediment amounts transported into water
reservoirs by different erosion processes cause harmful
consequences for energy and agricultural water use in the
semi-arid ecosystems of Anatolia in Turkey. Therefore, a
nationwide evaluation of erosion risk became a pressing
priority for natural resource managers and soil erosion
scientists to have to contain this threat, and a RUSLE model
based project was initiated by the General Directorate of
Combating Desertification and Erosion (ÇEM) under the
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF).
3
4
A = R x K x LS x C x P
A = Average Annual Soil Loss (tonne/hectare/year)
R = Rainfall-Runoff Erosivity Factor
LS = Slope Length and Steepness Factor
K = Soil Erodibility Factor
C = Cover Management Factor
P = Support Practice Factor
RUSLE
(Revised Universal Soil Loss
Equation)
A = R x K x LS x C x P
Dynamic Erosion Model and Monitoring
System (DEMIS) at the National Scale in
Turkey
5
RUSLE
(Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation)
A = R x K x LS x C x P
A = Average Annual Soil Loss (tonne / hectare / year)
R = Rainfall-Runoff Erosivity
Factor
LS = Slope Length and
Steepness Factor
K = Soil Erodibility Factor
C = Cover Management
Factor
P = Support Practice Factor
6
R Factor Map
C Factor Map K Factor Map
K Factor Points
7
Rainfall-Runoff Erosivity Factor (RUSLE-R)
DEMIS uses an existing map of R-factor of Turkey, which is
layered by using 357 minute-data of the Automatic
Meteorological Observation Station and calculated as a result of
the annual total energy of rainstorm (E, MJ ha-1y-1) and the
maximum 30-min intensity (I30, mm h-1) (E × I30) (Wischmeier and
Smith 1978; Foster et al. 1981; Renard et al. 1997; Erpul et. al.,
2016; Panagos et. al., 2017)
8
Rainfall-Runoff Erosivity Factor (RUSLE-R)
9
Soil Erodibility Factor (RUSLE-K)
DEMIS computes soil erodibility factor from 23 thousands of geo-
referenced soil samples distributed over Turkey. Dependent upon
presence of germane soil parameters required to estimate
erodibility, the equations of nomogragh (Wischmeier et al., 1971),
Torri et al. ((1997, 2002) and Römkens et a. (1986, 1997) were
utilized to assess K factor after regression analyses to express
best possible relations among three different K values.
10
Soil Erodibility Factor (RUSLE-K)
K Factor Map
K Factor Points
11
The topographic factor of DEMIS is interactively calculated by
slope length factor (L) and steepness factor (S) along with flow
accumulation (Moore and Bruch 1986a, b; Ogawa et al. 1997) (Eq.
2).
𝐿𝑆 =
𝑥𝜂
22,13
0,4 sin 𝜃
0,0896
1,3
[2]
Where χ is the flow accumulation and is obtained from DEM using
a GIS accumulation algorithm, which employs the watershed
delineation tool of Arc view 10.2 (Lee, 2004), ղ is the cell size, and
θ is the slope steepness in degrees.
Slope Length and Steepness Factor (RUSLE-LS)
12
LULC (Land Use/Cover) Map and Classes
DEMIS consumes 44 classes of CORINE land cover (CORINE 2012) as a base map for the RUSLE-C together
with correspondent values determined by Panagos et al. (2015). Furthermore, additional adaptive
corrections were performed combinatorially using the National Forest Map of Turkey given semi-arid
specificities of forest types and vegetative covers.
13
Cover Management Factor (RUSLE-C)
RUSLE-C is obtained by Combination of National Forest Map and CORINE 2012. C
factor values were taken for each class from Panagos et al. (2015) and values are
adapted to land and climatic conditions of Turkey.
Results and Discussion
14
Soil Loss (%)
Amount of Erosion
Erosion in Grassland
Areas
Erosion in Forest
Erosion in
Agricultural Areas
Erosion in Other
Areas0 - 1 1 - 5 5 - 10 10 - 20 20 - +
Basin Name Very Low Low Moderate Severe Very Severe tone year-1 tone year-1 tone year-1 tone year-1 tone year-1
Akarçay 60,58 20,95 8,58 5,22 4,67 4.803.394,68 2.942.856,75 124.601,12 1.618.646,32 117.290,49
Antalya 75,39 11,58 4,08 3,33 5,61 15.373.556,15 7.477.986,04 1.377.224,64 6.004.857,62 513.487,85
Aras 41,15 28,03 12,11 9,13 9,58 29.456.085,13 22.172.090,87 96.944,12 6.902.238,86 284.811,28
Asi 65,03 12,95 5,14 5,39 11,49 10.800.877,22 1.629.480,14 508.110,55 8.457.453,27 205.833,26
Batı Akdeniz 67,50 16,26 3,79 3,36 9,10 28.721.544,25 11.111.828,06 1.749.919,22 9.263.244,73 6.596.552,24
Batı Karadeniz 76,41 9,26 4,98 4,91 4,44 15.151.093,02 1.404.945,89 1.960.229,64 11.414.555,68 371.361,81
Burdur 70,12 15,19 5,89 3,97 4,83 3.644.525,70 2.156.494,65 223.751,97 1.203.910,01 60.369,07
Büyük Menderes 69,29 12,03 5,91 5,10 7,66 25.437.415,87 5.411.148,72 1.194.831,04 16.905.950,49 1.925.485,62
Ceyhan 60,86 18,27 7,85 6,76 6,26 15.429.686,09 6.716.129,21 800.240,95 7.631.105,98 282.209,95
Çoruh 43,57 18,19 9,64 8,84 19,75 52.848.848,78 45.180.341,26 872.526,46 6.402.981,79 392.999,27
Dicle-Fırat 52,75 22,37 9,56 6,98 8,34 159.832.719,65 121.178.327,61 3.331.647,99 32.938.556,44 2.384.187,61
Doğu Akdeniz 67,54 9,57 4,73 5,47 12,69 33.237.078,42 20.393.209,54 1.280.821,83 10.602.448,75 960.598,30
Doğu Karadeniz 42,01 25,66 12,75 10,15 9,42 26.517.468,22 12.761.467,04 1.923.627,55 11.827.101,39 5.272,24
Gediz 69,01 10,25 7,89 6,89 5,97 11.468.942,37 2.159.779,27 759.949,48 8.219.961,29 329.252,33
Kızılırmak 53,92 27,66 9,15 5,56 3,71 45.496.277,22 18.530.132,50 1.893.783,67 24.477.144,26 595.216,79
Konya Kapalı 70,86 17,43 5,23 3,24 3,23 23.211.147,68 14.616.611,82 570.592,76 7.100.886,66 923.056,44
Kuzey Ege 67,57 7,58 6,19 7,01 11,65 13.388.428,93 1.550.819,34 490.945,48 10.103.043,97 1.243.620,14
Küçük Menderes 68,17 11,02 5,42 5,80 9,60 7.576.292,14 1.530.695,79 366.066,31 5.011.660,34 667.869,70
Marmara 78,70 5,73 4,26 4,76 6,54 15.637.948,72 685.647,19 1.279.196,51 12.552.037,20 1.121.067,82
Meriç Ergene 58,38 18,40 9,41 7,68 6,13 10.337.920,51 680.343,82 292.100,90 9.092.113,68 273.362,11
Sakarya 63,02 22,67 7,54 4,39 2,38 26.524.638,92 9.156.326,71 2.044.084,88 14.576.100,21 748.127,12
Seyhan 67,98 14,30 5,83 5,14 6,74 18.174.922,94 12.415.406,76 745.757,01 4.425.382,13 588.377,04
Susurluk 72,64 11,20 7,48 5,79 2,89 10.821.938,74 888.545,87 1.306.496,82 7.985.891,62 641.004,43
Van Gölü 56,28 20,30 9,04 7,56 6,81 13.229.460,68 10.050.573,16 18.218,52 2.525.045,51 635.623,49
Yeşilırmak 58,72 21,53 9,10 5,97 4,69 25.086.331,57 11.814.405,41 1.600.355,85 11.372.018,29 299.552,02
TOTAL 60,28 19,13 7,93 5,97 6,70 642.208.543,60 344.615.593,42 26.812.025,27 248.614.336,49 22.166.588,42
Table 1: National statistics of DEMIS sorted out by 25 River Basins on soil erosion severity and soil loss rates (tone year-1) of different land use types
15
Results and Discussion
16
Conclusions
Maps of the predicted soil losses together with soil erosion risk classes at different scales
ranging from small watersheds up to big river basins in Turkey have been produced by
using the RUSLE methodology after a Dynamic Erosion Model and Monitoring System
(DEMIS) was set up. It continuously generates temporal and spatial statistics on when and
where human-induced erosion rates alarmingly threaten soil resources.
Given the fact that soil erosion is a threat causing significant loss of ecosystem services
and biodiversity and critical indicator for land degradation under the changing semi-arid
climate in Turkey, DEMIS as a supportive prediction tool and system would have a high
potentiality and provide opportunities for decision makers and policy developers not only
to minimize soil erosion aimed at by for Sustainable Soil Management (SSM) but also to
ensure sustainability of land resources by hierarchically avoiding, reducing and reversing
land degradation.
References
17
Anonim. 1982. Türkiye Genel Toprak Haritası Sayısal Toprak Veritabanı. Türkiye Toprak ve Su Kaynakları Ulusal Bilgi Merkezi (UBM) Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
Bayramin, I., Basaran, M., Erpul, G., & Canga, M. R. (2008). Assessing the effects of land use changes on soil sensitivity to erosion in a highland ecosystem of semi-arid Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 140, 249–265.
Demirci, A. and Karaburun, A. (2012) Estimation of Soil Erosion Using RUSLE in a GIS Framework: A Case Study in the Buyukcekmece Lake Watershed, Northwest Turkey. Environmental Earth Sciences, 66, 903-913. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1300-9
DSİ, (2013). Türkiye Akarsularında Süspanse Sediment Gözlemleri [2006-2012], Ankara.
E.İ.E.İ. 2006. Elektrik İşleri Etüd İdaresi Genel Müdürlüğü. Türkiye Akarsularında Süspanse Sediment Gözlemleri Yıllığı (1999-2005), Ankara.
Efe R., Ekinci D. & Curebal I. 2008. Erosion analysis of Sahin Creek watershed (NW of Turkey) using GIS based on Rusle (3d) method. J Appl Sci 8:49-58.
Erdogan, E.H. – Erpul, G. – Bayramin, I. (2007): Use of USLE/GIS Methodology for Predicting Soil Loss in a Semiarid Agricultural Watershed. Environ. Monit. Assess. 131: 153–161.
Erpul G., Şahin S., Akgöz, R., İnce K., Güden, A. Çetin, E. 2016. Türkiye Yağışlarının Özellikleri ve Yenilenmiş Evrensel Toprak Kayıpları Eşitliği (YETKE) R Faktörü. Çölleşme ve Erozyonla Mücadele Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları. ISBN:978-605-4610-93-8.
Erpul G., Şahin S., İnce K., Küçümen A., Akdağ M.A., Demirtaş İ., Çetin E., 2018. Türkiye Su Erozyonu Atlası. Çölleşme ve Erozyonla Mücadele Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları (ISBN: 978-605-9550-23-9). Ankara.
FAO and ITPS, 2015. Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR) – Technical Summary. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, Rome, Italy.
Foster, G.R., McCool, D.K., Renard, K.G., Moldenhauer, W.C., 1981. Conversion of the universal soil loss.
GDPS (General Directorate of Rural Service) (1986). 1/25000 Soil Map of Ankara, Turkey. Digital Soil Database: Soil and Water Resources National Information Centre, Turkey.
Hacisalihoğlu S., "Variations Of Measured And Simulated Soil-Loss Amounts In A Semiarid Area In Turkey", ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, vol.165, pp.255-262, 2010.
Karaburun, A., Demirci, A. ve Karakuyu, M. 2009. Erozyon tahmininde CBS tabanlı rusle metodunun kullanılması: büyükçekmece örneği, 3. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi CBS Sempozyumu CBS ve Bilgi Teknolojileri 10-11 Aralık, İstanbul.
Lee S. 2004. Soil erosion assessment and its verification using the universal soil loss equation and geographic information system: a case study at Boun, Korea. Environ Geol 45:457-465.
Madenoğlu, S., Şahin, S., Pınar, M.Ö. and Erpul, G. 2018. The effect of sustainable soil/land management on erosion and dam safety. 5th International Dam Safety Congress, Istanbul-Turkey.
Moore ID, Burch G. J. (1986a) Modelling erosion and deposition. Topographic effects Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 29:1624–1630 1640.
Moore ID, Burch G. J. (1986b) Physical basis of the length-slope factor in the universal soil loss equation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1294– 1298
Ogawa S, Saito G, Mino N, Uch Da S, Khan NM, Shafiq M (1997) Estimation of soil erosion using USLE and Landsat TM in Pakistan, GIS development. Net, ACRS, pp 1–5.
Özcan A.U., Uzun O., Başaran M., Erpul G., Akşit S. and Palancıoğlu H.M. 2015. Soil Erosion Risk Assessment for Volcano Cone of Alidaği Mountain by Using Usle/Rusle, GIS and Geostatistics. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, Volume 24 – No 6. 2015.
Panagos, P. et al. (2015). The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy 54, 438–447.
Panagos, P., Borrelli, P., Meusburger, K., Yu, B., Klik, A., Lim, K.J., Yang, J. E., Ni, J., Miao, C., Chattopadhyay, N., Sadeghi, S.H., Hazbavi, Z., Zabihi, M., Larionov, G. A., Krasnov, S.F., Gorobets, A.V., Levi, Y., Erpul, G., Birkel, C., Hoyos, N., Naipal, V., Oliveira, P. T. S., Bonilla, C. A., Meddi, M., Nel, W., Al-Dashti, H., Boni, M., Diodato, N., Van Oost, K., Nearing, M. and Ballabio, C. 2017. Global rainfall erosivity
assessment based on high-temporal resolution rainfall records. 7: 4175 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-04282-8.
Pınar, M.Ö., Şahin, S., Madenoğlu, S. and Erpul, G. 2018. Determining Severe Erosion Affected Areas and Estimation Reservoir Sediment Load in Derinöz Dam Basin. 5th International Symposium of Dam Safety (27-31/10/2018). Istanbul-Turkey.
Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Weesies, G. A., McCool, D. K., & Yoder, D. C. (1997). Predicting soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation RUSLE (p. 404). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 703, Government Printing Office, SSOP, Washington, D.C., ISBN 0-16-048938-5.
Römkens, M. J. M., R. A. Young, J. W. A. Poesen, D. K. McCool, S. A. El‐Swaify, and J. M. Bradford. 1997. Soil erodibility factor (K). In Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) 65‐99. K. G. Renard et al., eds. Washington, D.C.: USDA.
Römkens, M. J. M., S. N. Prasad, and J. W. A. Poesen. 1986. Soil erodibility and properties. In Proc. of the 13th Congress of theIntl. Soil Science Society 5: 492‐504.
Saygin S.D., Ozcan A.U., Basaran M. et al. 2014. The combined RUSLE/SDR approach integrated with GIS and geostatistics to estimate annual sediment flux rates in the semi-arid catchment, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 71:1605-1618.
Topçu, P. and Erpul, G. 2017. Climate Change and Sustainable Soil Management (SSM). Türk Coğrafya Kurumu (TCK) 75. Yıl Uluslararası Kongresi, 654-660.
Torri, D., Poesen, J., Borselli, L. (1997) Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using a global dataset. Catena 31, 1–22.
Torri, D., Poesen, J., Borselli, L. (2002) Corrigendum to ‘‘Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using a global dataset’’ [Catena 31(1997): 1–22] and to ‘‘Erratum to Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using a global dataset. [Catena 32(1998):307–308]’’. Catena 46, 309–310.
Tunç, E, Schröder D (2010a). Ankara’nın Batısındaki Tarım Topraklarında USLE ile Erozyon Boyutunun Tespiti, Ekoloji Dergisi 19, 75(1): 58-63.
Tunç, E., Schröder, D. (2010b). Vergleichen der Bodenerosion von Landwirtschaftlich Genutzten Flaechen in Mittelanatolien und Rheinland-Pfalz. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 47(1): 11-20.
Wischmeier et all. (1971) A soil Erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites. J Soil Sci Water Conserv 26(5):189–193.
Wischmeier, W.H., Smith, D.D. (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses–a guide for conservation planning. USDA, Agricultural Handbook, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC., pp. 537.
Yuksel, A., Gundogan, R., Akay., A.E. 2008. Using the remote sensing and GIS technology for erosion risk mapping of Kartalkaya Dam watershed in Kahramanmaras, Turkey.
Dynamic Erosion Model and Monitoring System (DEMIS)

More Related Content

What's hot

Soil Erosion for Vishwamitri River watershed using RS and GIS
Soil Erosion for Vishwamitri River watershed using RS and GISSoil Erosion for Vishwamitri River watershed using RS and GIS
Soil Erosion for Vishwamitri River watershed using RS and GIS
vishvam Pancholi
 
Assessment of groundwater potential zone in paschim medinipur district, west ...
Assessment of groundwater potential zone in paschim medinipur district, west ...Assessment of groundwater potential zone in paschim medinipur district, west ...
Assessment of groundwater potential zone in paschim medinipur district, west ...
Alexander Decker
 
Flood modelling and prediction 1
Flood modelling and prediction 1Flood modelling and prediction 1
Flood modelling and prediction 1
tp jayamohan
 
Demarcation of ground water potential zones using remote sensing & gis
Demarcation of ground water potential zones using remote sensing & gisDemarcation of ground water potential zones using remote sensing & gis
Demarcation of ground water potential zones using remote sensing & gis
Debabrata Nandi
 
Land use and land cover
Land use and land coverLand use and land cover
Land use and land cover
Madurai Kamaraj University
 
Spatial variation in surface runoff at catchment scale, the case study of adi...
Spatial variation in surface runoff at catchment scale, the case study of adi...Spatial variation in surface runoff at catchment scale, the case study of adi...
Spatial variation in surface runoff at catchment scale, the case study of adi...
Alexander Decker
 
10. aneesha rahman and madha suresh
10. aneesha rahman and madha suresh10. aneesha rahman and madha suresh
10. aneesha rahman and madha suresh
Journal of Global Resources
 
Land use and land cover classification
Land use and land cover classification Land use and land cover classification
Land use and land cover classification
Calcutta University
 
Soil erosion assessment using RUSLE and Projection Augmented Landscape Model ...
Soil erosion assessment using RUSLE and Projection Augmented Landscape Model ...Soil erosion assessment using RUSLE and Projection Augmented Landscape Model ...
Soil erosion assessment using RUSLE and Projection Augmented Landscape Model ...
ExternalEvents
 
Digital soil mapping
Digital soil mappingDigital soil mapping
Digital soil mappingCIAT
 
Universal soil loss equation
Universal soil loss equationUniversal soil loss equation
Universal soil loss equation
SUSHMA TAMTA
 
landslide hazard mapping in Ethiopia
landslide hazard mapping in Ethiopialandslide hazard mapping in Ethiopia
landslide hazard mapping in Ethiopia
University of Gondar
 
GIS application in Natural Resource Management
GIS application in Natural Resource ManagementGIS application in Natural Resource Management
GIS application in Natural Resource ManagementAchal Gupta
 
Methods & types of soil survey
Methods & types of soil surveyMethods & types of soil survey
Methods & types of soil survey
sethupathi siva
 
APPLICATIONS OF REMOTE SENSING AND GIS IN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
APPLICATIONS OF REMOTE SENSING AND GIS IN WATERSHED MANAGEMENTAPPLICATIONS OF REMOTE SENSING AND GIS IN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
APPLICATIONS OF REMOTE SENSING AND GIS IN WATERSHED MANAGEMENTSriram Chakravarthy
 
Application of GIS and RS in Watershed Management
Application of GIS and RS in Watershed ManagementApplication of GIS and RS in Watershed Management
Application of GIS and RS in Watershed Management
holegajendra
 
Contributions of Satellite Images in the Diachronic Study of the Stanley-Pool...
Contributions of Satellite Images in the Diachronic Study of the Stanley-Pool...Contributions of Satellite Images in the Diachronic Study of the Stanley-Pool...
Contributions of Satellite Images in the Diachronic Study of the Stanley-Pool...
INFOGAIN PUBLICATION
 
Simulation of sediment transport to Sawah rice fields by applying the water e...
Simulation of sediment transport to Sawah rice fields by applying the water e...Simulation of sediment transport to Sawah rice fields by applying the water e...
Simulation of sediment transport to Sawah rice fields by applying the water e...
Eric Takyi Atakora , Ph.D (candidate)
 
Analysis of Sand Dunes Accumulation using Remote Sensing and GIS
Analysis of Sand Dunes Accumulation using Remote Sensing and GISAnalysis of Sand Dunes Accumulation using Remote Sensing and GIS
Analysis of Sand Dunes Accumulation using Remote Sensing and GIS
ijtsrd
 
Modified Flash Flood Potential Index
Modified Flash Flood Potential IndexModified Flash Flood Potential Index
Modified Flash Flood Potential Index
Gabriel Lazar
 

What's hot (20)

Soil Erosion for Vishwamitri River watershed using RS and GIS
Soil Erosion for Vishwamitri River watershed using RS and GISSoil Erosion for Vishwamitri River watershed using RS and GIS
Soil Erosion for Vishwamitri River watershed using RS and GIS
 
Assessment of groundwater potential zone in paschim medinipur district, west ...
Assessment of groundwater potential zone in paschim medinipur district, west ...Assessment of groundwater potential zone in paschim medinipur district, west ...
Assessment of groundwater potential zone in paschim medinipur district, west ...
 
Flood modelling and prediction 1
Flood modelling and prediction 1Flood modelling and prediction 1
Flood modelling and prediction 1
 
Demarcation of ground water potential zones using remote sensing & gis
Demarcation of ground water potential zones using remote sensing & gisDemarcation of ground water potential zones using remote sensing & gis
Demarcation of ground water potential zones using remote sensing & gis
 
Land use and land cover
Land use and land coverLand use and land cover
Land use and land cover
 
Spatial variation in surface runoff at catchment scale, the case study of adi...
Spatial variation in surface runoff at catchment scale, the case study of adi...Spatial variation in surface runoff at catchment scale, the case study of adi...
Spatial variation in surface runoff at catchment scale, the case study of adi...
 
10. aneesha rahman and madha suresh
10. aneesha rahman and madha suresh10. aneesha rahman and madha suresh
10. aneesha rahman and madha suresh
 
Land use and land cover classification
Land use and land cover classification Land use and land cover classification
Land use and land cover classification
 
Soil erosion assessment using RUSLE and Projection Augmented Landscape Model ...
Soil erosion assessment using RUSLE and Projection Augmented Landscape Model ...Soil erosion assessment using RUSLE and Projection Augmented Landscape Model ...
Soil erosion assessment using RUSLE and Projection Augmented Landscape Model ...
 
Digital soil mapping
Digital soil mappingDigital soil mapping
Digital soil mapping
 
Universal soil loss equation
Universal soil loss equationUniversal soil loss equation
Universal soil loss equation
 
landslide hazard mapping in Ethiopia
landslide hazard mapping in Ethiopialandslide hazard mapping in Ethiopia
landslide hazard mapping in Ethiopia
 
GIS application in Natural Resource Management
GIS application in Natural Resource ManagementGIS application in Natural Resource Management
GIS application in Natural Resource Management
 
Methods & types of soil survey
Methods & types of soil surveyMethods & types of soil survey
Methods & types of soil survey
 
APPLICATIONS OF REMOTE SENSING AND GIS IN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
APPLICATIONS OF REMOTE SENSING AND GIS IN WATERSHED MANAGEMENTAPPLICATIONS OF REMOTE SENSING AND GIS IN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
APPLICATIONS OF REMOTE SENSING AND GIS IN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
 
Application of GIS and RS in Watershed Management
Application of GIS and RS in Watershed ManagementApplication of GIS and RS in Watershed Management
Application of GIS and RS in Watershed Management
 
Contributions of Satellite Images in the Diachronic Study of the Stanley-Pool...
Contributions of Satellite Images in the Diachronic Study of the Stanley-Pool...Contributions of Satellite Images in the Diachronic Study of the Stanley-Pool...
Contributions of Satellite Images in the Diachronic Study of the Stanley-Pool...
 
Simulation of sediment transport to Sawah rice fields by applying the water e...
Simulation of sediment transport to Sawah rice fields by applying the water e...Simulation of sediment transport to Sawah rice fields by applying the water e...
Simulation of sediment transport to Sawah rice fields by applying the water e...
 
Analysis of Sand Dunes Accumulation using Remote Sensing and GIS
Analysis of Sand Dunes Accumulation using Remote Sensing and GISAnalysis of Sand Dunes Accumulation using Remote Sensing and GIS
Analysis of Sand Dunes Accumulation using Remote Sensing and GIS
 
Modified Flash Flood Potential Index
Modified Flash Flood Potential IndexModified Flash Flood Potential Index
Modified Flash Flood Potential Index
 

Similar to Dynamic Erosion Model and Monitoring System (DEMIS)

A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...
A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...
A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...Alexander Decker
 
A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...
A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...
A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...Alexander Decker
 
Estimation Of Soil Erosion In Andhale Watershed Using USLE And GIS
Estimation Of Soil Erosion In Andhale Watershed Using USLE And GISEstimation Of Soil Erosion In Andhale Watershed Using USLE And GIS
Estimation Of Soil Erosion In Andhale Watershed Using USLE And GIS
IRJET Journal
 
05Soil_Erosion.pdf
05Soil_Erosion.pdf05Soil_Erosion.pdf
05Soil_Erosion.pdf
AnishRatnaShakya
 
IRJET- Geomatics Model of Soil Erosion in Chittar Sub-Watersed, Vamanapuram R...
IRJET- Geomatics Model of Soil Erosion in Chittar Sub-Watersed, Vamanapuram R...IRJET- Geomatics Model of Soil Erosion in Chittar Sub-Watersed, Vamanapuram R...
IRJET- Geomatics Model of Soil Erosion in Chittar Sub-Watersed, Vamanapuram R...
IRJET Journal
 
The modeling of slope erosion rate by using paddy straw fibers as cover for l...
The modeling of slope erosion rate by using paddy straw fibers as cover for l...The modeling of slope erosion rate by using paddy straw fibers as cover for l...
The modeling of slope erosion rate by using paddy straw fibers as cover for l...
IAEME Publication
 
THE MODELING OF SLOPE EROSION RATE BY USING PADDY STRAW FIBERS AS COVER FOR L...
THE MODELING OF SLOPE EROSION RATE BY USING PADDY STRAW FIBERS AS COVER FOR L...THE MODELING OF SLOPE EROSION RATE BY USING PADDY STRAW FIBERS AS COVER FOR L...
THE MODELING OF SLOPE EROSION RATE BY USING PADDY STRAW FIBERS AS COVER FOR L...
IAEME Publication
 
Soil Erosion Risk Assessment Using GIS Based USLE Model for Soil and Water Co...
Soil Erosion Risk Assessment Using GIS Based USLE Model for Soil and Water Co...Soil Erosion Risk Assessment Using GIS Based USLE Model for Soil and Water Co...
Soil Erosion Risk Assessment Using GIS Based USLE Model for Soil and Water Co...
Agriculture Journal IJOEAR
 
Ecological indicators
Ecological indicatorsEcological indicators
Ecological indicatorsTaha Gorji
 
Uganda investment forum_-_natural_resources_-_keith_winning_-_cbi
Uganda investment forum_-_natural_resources_-_keith_winning_-_cbiUganda investment forum_-_natural_resources_-_keith_winning_-_cbi
Uganda investment forum_-_natural_resources_-_keith_winning_-_cbiWilly Mutenza
 
A review of the Application of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation for e...
A review of the Application of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation for e...A review of the Application of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation for e...
A review of the Application of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation for e...
IRJET Journal
 
Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...
Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...
Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...
ExternalEvents
 
Ijciet 10 01_014
Ijciet 10 01_014Ijciet 10 01_014
Ijciet 10 01_014
IAEME Publication
 
USLE
USLEUSLE
Watershed management: Role of Geospatial Technology
Watershed management: Role of Geospatial TechnologyWatershed management: Role of Geospatial Technology
Watershed management: Role of Geospatial Technology
amritpaldigra30
 
Integrated Approach of GIS and USLE for Erosion Risk Analysis in the Sapanca ...
Integrated Approach of GIS and USLE for Erosion Risk Analysis in the Sapanca ...Integrated Approach of GIS and USLE for Erosion Risk Analysis in the Sapanca ...
Integrated Approach of GIS and USLE for Erosion Risk Analysis in the Sapanca ...
theijes
 
Analysis of runoff for vishwamitri river watershed using scs cn method and ge...
Analysis of runoff for vishwamitri river watershed using scs cn method and ge...Analysis of runoff for vishwamitri river watershed using scs cn method and ge...
Analysis of runoff for vishwamitri river watershed using scs cn method and ge...
vishvam Pancholi
 
Streamflow simulation using radar-based precipitation applied to the Illinois...
Streamflow simulation using radar-based precipitation applied to the Illinois...Streamflow simulation using radar-based precipitation applied to the Illinois...
Streamflow simulation using radar-based precipitation applied to the Illinois...
Alireza Safari
 
Turkey’s National Geospatial Soil Organic Carbon Information System
Turkey’s National Geospatial Soil Organic Carbon Information SystemTurkey’s National Geospatial Soil Organic Carbon Information System
Turkey’s National Geospatial Soil Organic Carbon Information System
ExternalEvents
 

Similar to Dynamic Erosion Model and Monitoring System (DEMIS) (20)

A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...
A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...
A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...
 
A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...
A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...
A geographic information system based soil loss and sediment estimation in ge...
 
Estimation Of Soil Erosion In Andhale Watershed Using USLE And GIS
Estimation Of Soil Erosion In Andhale Watershed Using USLE And GISEstimation Of Soil Erosion In Andhale Watershed Using USLE And GIS
Estimation Of Soil Erosion In Andhale Watershed Using USLE And GIS
 
05Soil_Erosion.pdf
05Soil_Erosion.pdf05Soil_Erosion.pdf
05Soil_Erosion.pdf
 
J willis
J willisJ willis
J willis
 
IRJET- Geomatics Model of Soil Erosion in Chittar Sub-Watersed, Vamanapuram R...
IRJET- Geomatics Model of Soil Erosion in Chittar Sub-Watersed, Vamanapuram R...IRJET- Geomatics Model of Soil Erosion in Chittar Sub-Watersed, Vamanapuram R...
IRJET- Geomatics Model of Soil Erosion in Chittar Sub-Watersed, Vamanapuram R...
 
The modeling of slope erosion rate by using paddy straw fibers as cover for l...
The modeling of slope erosion rate by using paddy straw fibers as cover for l...The modeling of slope erosion rate by using paddy straw fibers as cover for l...
The modeling of slope erosion rate by using paddy straw fibers as cover for l...
 
THE MODELING OF SLOPE EROSION RATE BY USING PADDY STRAW FIBERS AS COVER FOR L...
THE MODELING OF SLOPE EROSION RATE BY USING PADDY STRAW FIBERS AS COVER FOR L...THE MODELING OF SLOPE EROSION RATE BY USING PADDY STRAW FIBERS AS COVER FOR L...
THE MODELING OF SLOPE EROSION RATE BY USING PADDY STRAW FIBERS AS COVER FOR L...
 
Soil Erosion Risk Assessment Using GIS Based USLE Model for Soil and Water Co...
Soil Erosion Risk Assessment Using GIS Based USLE Model for Soil and Water Co...Soil Erosion Risk Assessment Using GIS Based USLE Model for Soil and Water Co...
Soil Erosion Risk Assessment Using GIS Based USLE Model for Soil and Water Co...
 
Ecological indicators
Ecological indicatorsEcological indicators
Ecological indicators
 
Uganda investment forum_-_natural_resources_-_keith_winning_-_cbi
Uganda investment forum_-_natural_resources_-_keith_winning_-_cbiUganda investment forum_-_natural_resources_-_keith_winning_-_cbi
Uganda investment forum_-_natural_resources_-_keith_winning_-_cbi
 
A review of the Application of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation for e...
A review of the Application of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation for e...A review of the Application of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation for e...
A review of the Application of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation for e...
 
Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...
Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...
Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...
 
Ijciet 10 01_014
Ijciet 10 01_014Ijciet 10 01_014
Ijciet 10 01_014
 
USLE
USLEUSLE
USLE
 
Watershed management: Role of Geospatial Technology
Watershed management: Role of Geospatial TechnologyWatershed management: Role of Geospatial Technology
Watershed management: Role of Geospatial Technology
 
Integrated Approach of GIS and USLE for Erosion Risk Analysis in the Sapanca ...
Integrated Approach of GIS and USLE for Erosion Risk Analysis in the Sapanca ...Integrated Approach of GIS and USLE for Erosion Risk Analysis in the Sapanca ...
Integrated Approach of GIS and USLE for Erosion Risk Analysis in the Sapanca ...
 
Analysis of runoff for vishwamitri river watershed using scs cn method and ge...
Analysis of runoff for vishwamitri river watershed using scs cn method and ge...Analysis of runoff for vishwamitri river watershed using scs cn method and ge...
Analysis of runoff for vishwamitri river watershed using scs cn method and ge...
 
Streamflow simulation using radar-based precipitation applied to the Illinois...
Streamflow simulation using radar-based precipitation applied to the Illinois...Streamflow simulation using radar-based precipitation applied to the Illinois...
Streamflow simulation using radar-based precipitation applied to the Illinois...
 
Turkey’s National Geospatial Soil Organic Carbon Information System
Turkey’s National Geospatial Soil Organic Carbon Information SystemTurkey’s National Geospatial Soil Organic Carbon Information System
Turkey’s National Geospatial Soil Organic Carbon Information System
 

More from ExternalEvents

Mauritania
Mauritania Mauritania
Mauritania
ExternalEvents
 
Malawi - M. Munthali
Malawi - M. MunthaliMalawi - M. Munthali
Malawi - M. Munthali
ExternalEvents
 
Malawi (Mbewe)
Malawi (Mbewe)Malawi (Mbewe)
Malawi (Mbewe)
ExternalEvents
 
Malawi (Desideri)
Malawi (Desideri)Malawi (Desideri)
Malawi (Desideri)
ExternalEvents
 
Lesotho
LesothoLesotho
Kenya
KenyaKenya
ICRAF: Soil-plant spectral diagnostics laboratory
ICRAF: Soil-plant spectral diagnostics laboratoryICRAF: Soil-plant spectral diagnostics laboratory
ICRAF: Soil-plant spectral diagnostics laboratory
ExternalEvents
 
Ghana
GhanaGhana
Ethiopia
EthiopiaEthiopia
Ethiopia
ExternalEvents
 
Item 15
Item 15Item 15
Item 14
Item 14Item 14
Item 13
Item 13Item 13
Item 7
Item 7Item 7
Item 6
Item 6Item 6
Item 3
Item 3Item 3
Item 16
Item 16Item 16
Item 9: Soil mapping to support sustainable agriculture
Item 9: Soil mapping to support sustainable agricultureItem 9: Soil mapping to support sustainable agriculture
Item 9: Soil mapping to support sustainable agriculture
ExternalEvents
 
Item 8: WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resouces
Item 8: WRB, World Reference Base for Soil ResoucesItem 8: WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resouces
Item 8: WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resouces
ExternalEvents
 
Item 7: Progress made in Nepal
Item 7: Progress made in NepalItem 7: Progress made in Nepal
Item 7: Progress made in Nepal
ExternalEvents
 
Item 6: International Center for Biosaline Agriculture
Item 6: International Center for Biosaline AgricultureItem 6: International Center for Biosaline Agriculture
Item 6: International Center for Biosaline Agriculture
ExternalEvents
 

More from ExternalEvents (20)

Mauritania
Mauritania Mauritania
Mauritania
 
Malawi - M. Munthali
Malawi - M. MunthaliMalawi - M. Munthali
Malawi - M. Munthali
 
Malawi (Mbewe)
Malawi (Mbewe)Malawi (Mbewe)
Malawi (Mbewe)
 
Malawi (Desideri)
Malawi (Desideri)Malawi (Desideri)
Malawi (Desideri)
 
Lesotho
LesothoLesotho
Lesotho
 
Kenya
KenyaKenya
Kenya
 
ICRAF: Soil-plant spectral diagnostics laboratory
ICRAF: Soil-plant spectral diagnostics laboratoryICRAF: Soil-plant spectral diagnostics laboratory
ICRAF: Soil-plant spectral diagnostics laboratory
 
Ghana
GhanaGhana
Ghana
 
Ethiopia
EthiopiaEthiopia
Ethiopia
 
Item 15
Item 15Item 15
Item 15
 
Item 14
Item 14Item 14
Item 14
 
Item 13
Item 13Item 13
Item 13
 
Item 7
Item 7Item 7
Item 7
 
Item 6
Item 6Item 6
Item 6
 
Item 3
Item 3Item 3
Item 3
 
Item 16
Item 16Item 16
Item 16
 
Item 9: Soil mapping to support sustainable agriculture
Item 9: Soil mapping to support sustainable agricultureItem 9: Soil mapping to support sustainable agriculture
Item 9: Soil mapping to support sustainable agriculture
 
Item 8: WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resouces
Item 8: WRB, World Reference Base for Soil ResoucesItem 8: WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resouces
Item 8: WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resouces
 
Item 7: Progress made in Nepal
Item 7: Progress made in NepalItem 7: Progress made in Nepal
Item 7: Progress made in Nepal
 
Item 6: International Center for Biosaline Agriculture
Item 6: International Center for Biosaline AgricultureItem 6: International Center for Biosaline Agriculture
Item 6: International Center for Biosaline Agriculture
 

Recently uploaded

678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
CarlosHernanMontoyab2
 
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Atul Kumar Singh
 
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Peter Windle
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
BhavyaRajput3
 
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe..."Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
SACHIN R KONDAGURI
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Anna Sz.
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Balvir Singh
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
siemaillard
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
joachimlavalley1
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
beazzy04
 
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptxSupporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Jisc
 
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxHonest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
timhan337
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Thiyagu K
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
JosvitaDsouza2
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Pavel ( NSTU)
 
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxInstructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Jheel Barad
 
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Ashokrao Mane college of Pharmacy Peth-Vadgaon
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
EverAndrsGuerraGuerr
 

Recently uploaded (20)

678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
 
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
 
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
 
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe..."Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
 
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
 
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptxSupporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
 
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxHonest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
 
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxInstructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
 
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
 

Dynamic Erosion Model and Monitoring System (DEMIS)

  • 1. 1
  • 2. Dynamic Erosion Model and Monitoring System (DEMIS) at the National Scale in Turkey Mehmet Ali Akdag 2
  • 3. Dynamic Erosion Model and Monitoring System (DEMIS) at the National Scale in Turkey Soil erosion is one of the most important means that threatens the sustainable use of soil resources in the catchments of Turkey (FAO and ITPS, 2015). Also, varying with climate, soil, topography and land cover and management, sediment amounts transported into water reservoirs by different erosion processes cause harmful consequences for energy and agricultural water use in the semi-arid ecosystems of Anatolia in Turkey. Therefore, a nationwide evaluation of erosion risk became a pressing priority for natural resource managers and soil erosion scientists to have to contain this threat, and a RUSLE model based project was initiated by the General Directorate of Combating Desertification and Erosion (ÇEM) under the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF). 3
  • 4. 4 A = R x K x LS x C x P A = Average Annual Soil Loss (tonne/hectare/year) R = Rainfall-Runoff Erosivity Factor LS = Slope Length and Steepness Factor K = Soil Erodibility Factor C = Cover Management Factor P = Support Practice Factor RUSLE (Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation) A = R x K x LS x C x P Dynamic Erosion Model and Monitoring System (DEMIS) at the National Scale in Turkey
  • 5. 5 RUSLE (Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation) A = R x K x LS x C x P A = Average Annual Soil Loss (tonne / hectare / year) R = Rainfall-Runoff Erosivity Factor LS = Slope Length and Steepness Factor K = Soil Erodibility Factor C = Cover Management Factor P = Support Practice Factor
  • 6. 6 R Factor Map C Factor Map K Factor Map K Factor Points
  • 7. 7 Rainfall-Runoff Erosivity Factor (RUSLE-R) DEMIS uses an existing map of R-factor of Turkey, which is layered by using 357 minute-data of the Automatic Meteorological Observation Station and calculated as a result of the annual total energy of rainstorm (E, MJ ha-1y-1) and the maximum 30-min intensity (I30, mm h-1) (E × I30) (Wischmeier and Smith 1978; Foster et al. 1981; Renard et al. 1997; Erpul et. al., 2016; Panagos et. al., 2017)
  • 9. 9 Soil Erodibility Factor (RUSLE-K) DEMIS computes soil erodibility factor from 23 thousands of geo- referenced soil samples distributed over Turkey. Dependent upon presence of germane soil parameters required to estimate erodibility, the equations of nomogragh (Wischmeier et al., 1971), Torri et al. ((1997, 2002) and Römkens et a. (1986, 1997) were utilized to assess K factor after regression analyses to express best possible relations among three different K values.
  • 10. 10 Soil Erodibility Factor (RUSLE-K) K Factor Map K Factor Points
  • 11. 11 The topographic factor of DEMIS is interactively calculated by slope length factor (L) and steepness factor (S) along with flow accumulation (Moore and Bruch 1986a, b; Ogawa et al. 1997) (Eq. 2). 𝐿𝑆 = 𝑥𝜂 22,13 0,4 sin 𝜃 0,0896 1,3 [2] Where χ is the flow accumulation and is obtained from DEM using a GIS accumulation algorithm, which employs the watershed delineation tool of Arc view 10.2 (Lee, 2004), ղ is the cell size, and θ is the slope steepness in degrees. Slope Length and Steepness Factor (RUSLE-LS)
  • 12. 12 LULC (Land Use/Cover) Map and Classes DEMIS consumes 44 classes of CORINE land cover (CORINE 2012) as a base map for the RUSLE-C together with correspondent values determined by Panagos et al. (2015). Furthermore, additional adaptive corrections were performed combinatorially using the National Forest Map of Turkey given semi-arid specificities of forest types and vegetative covers.
  • 13. 13 Cover Management Factor (RUSLE-C) RUSLE-C is obtained by Combination of National Forest Map and CORINE 2012. C factor values were taken for each class from Panagos et al. (2015) and values are adapted to land and climatic conditions of Turkey.
  • 14. Results and Discussion 14 Soil Loss (%) Amount of Erosion Erosion in Grassland Areas Erosion in Forest Erosion in Agricultural Areas Erosion in Other Areas0 - 1 1 - 5 5 - 10 10 - 20 20 - + Basin Name Very Low Low Moderate Severe Very Severe tone year-1 tone year-1 tone year-1 tone year-1 tone year-1 Akarçay 60,58 20,95 8,58 5,22 4,67 4.803.394,68 2.942.856,75 124.601,12 1.618.646,32 117.290,49 Antalya 75,39 11,58 4,08 3,33 5,61 15.373.556,15 7.477.986,04 1.377.224,64 6.004.857,62 513.487,85 Aras 41,15 28,03 12,11 9,13 9,58 29.456.085,13 22.172.090,87 96.944,12 6.902.238,86 284.811,28 Asi 65,03 12,95 5,14 5,39 11,49 10.800.877,22 1.629.480,14 508.110,55 8.457.453,27 205.833,26 Batı Akdeniz 67,50 16,26 3,79 3,36 9,10 28.721.544,25 11.111.828,06 1.749.919,22 9.263.244,73 6.596.552,24 Batı Karadeniz 76,41 9,26 4,98 4,91 4,44 15.151.093,02 1.404.945,89 1.960.229,64 11.414.555,68 371.361,81 Burdur 70,12 15,19 5,89 3,97 4,83 3.644.525,70 2.156.494,65 223.751,97 1.203.910,01 60.369,07 Büyük Menderes 69,29 12,03 5,91 5,10 7,66 25.437.415,87 5.411.148,72 1.194.831,04 16.905.950,49 1.925.485,62 Ceyhan 60,86 18,27 7,85 6,76 6,26 15.429.686,09 6.716.129,21 800.240,95 7.631.105,98 282.209,95 Çoruh 43,57 18,19 9,64 8,84 19,75 52.848.848,78 45.180.341,26 872.526,46 6.402.981,79 392.999,27 Dicle-Fırat 52,75 22,37 9,56 6,98 8,34 159.832.719,65 121.178.327,61 3.331.647,99 32.938.556,44 2.384.187,61 Doğu Akdeniz 67,54 9,57 4,73 5,47 12,69 33.237.078,42 20.393.209,54 1.280.821,83 10.602.448,75 960.598,30 Doğu Karadeniz 42,01 25,66 12,75 10,15 9,42 26.517.468,22 12.761.467,04 1.923.627,55 11.827.101,39 5.272,24 Gediz 69,01 10,25 7,89 6,89 5,97 11.468.942,37 2.159.779,27 759.949,48 8.219.961,29 329.252,33 Kızılırmak 53,92 27,66 9,15 5,56 3,71 45.496.277,22 18.530.132,50 1.893.783,67 24.477.144,26 595.216,79 Konya Kapalı 70,86 17,43 5,23 3,24 3,23 23.211.147,68 14.616.611,82 570.592,76 7.100.886,66 923.056,44 Kuzey Ege 67,57 7,58 6,19 7,01 11,65 13.388.428,93 1.550.819,34 490.945,48 10.103.043,97 1.243.620,14 Küçük Menderes 68,17 11,02 5,42 5,80 9,60 7.576.292,14 1.530.695,79 366.066,31 5.011.660,34 667.869,70 Marmara 78,70 5,73 4,26 4,76 6,54 15.637.948,72 685.647,19 1.279.196,51 12.552.037,20 1.121.067,82 Meriç Ergene 58,38 18,40 9,41 7,68 6,13 10.337.920,51 680.343,82 292.100,90 9.092.113,68 273.362,11 Sakarya 63,02 22,67 7,54 4,39 2,38 26.524.638,92 9.156.326,71 2.044.084,88 14.576.100,21 748.127,12 Seyhan 67,98 14,30 5,83 5,14 6,74 18.174.922,94 12.415.406,76 745.757,01 4.425.382,13 588.377,04 Susurluk 72,64 11,20 7,48 5,79 2,89 10.821.938,74 888.545,87 1.306.496,82 7.985.891,62 641.004,43 Van Gölü 56,28 20,30 9,04 7,56 6,81 13.229.460,68 10.050.573,16 18.218,52 2.525.045,51 635.623,49 Yeşilırmak 58,72 21,53 9,10 5,97 4,69 25.086.331,57 11.814.405,41 1.600.355,85 11.372.018,29 299.552,02 TOTAL 60,28 19,13 7,93 5,97 6,70 642.208.543,60 344.615.593,42 26.812.025,27 248.614.336,49 22.166.588,42 Table 1: National statistics of DEMIS sorted out by 25 River Basins on soil erosion severity and soil loss rates (tone year-1) of different land use types
  • 16. 16 Conclusions Maps of the predicted soil losses together with soil erosion risk classes at different scales ranging from small watersheds up to big river basins in Turkey have been produced by using the RUSLE methodology after a Dynamic Erosion Model and Monitoring System (DEMIS) was set up. It continuously generates temporal and spatial statistics on when and where human-induced erosion rates alarmingly threaten soil resources. Given the fact that soil erosion is a threat causing significant loss of ecosystem services and biodiversity and critical indicator for land degradation under the changing semi-arid climate in Turkey, DEMIS as a supportive prediction tool and system would have a high potentiality and provide opportunities for decision makers and policy developers not only to minimize soil erosion aimed at by for Sustainable Soil Management (SSM) but also to ensure sustainability of land resources by hierarchically avoiding, reducing and reversing land degradation.
  • 17. References 17 Anonim. 1982. Türkiye Genel Toprak Haritası Sayısal Toprak Veritabanı. Türkiye Toprak ve Su Kaynakları Ulusal Bilgi Merkezi (UBM) Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara. Bayramin, I., Basaran, M., Erpul, G., & Canga, M. R. (2008). Assessing the effects of land use changes on soil sensitivity to erosion in a highland ecosystem of semi-arid Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 140, 249–265. Demirci, A. and Karaburun, A. (2012) Estimation of Soil Erosion Using RUSLE in a GIS Framework: A Case Study in the Buyukcekmece Lake Watershed, Northwest Turkey. Environmental Earth Sciences, 66, 903-913. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1300-9 DSİ, (2013). Türkiye Akarsularında Süspanse Sediment Gözlemleri [2006-2012], Ankara. E.İ.E.İ. 2006. Elektrik İşleri Etüd İdaresi Genel Müdürlüğü. Türkiye Akarsularında Süspanse Sediment Gözlemleri Yıllığı (1999-2005), Ankara. Efe R., Ekinci D. & Curebal I. 2008. Erosion analysis of Sahin Creek watershed (NW of Turkey) using GIS based on Rusle (3d) method. J Appl Sci 8:49-58. Erdogan, E.H. – Erpul, G. – Bayramin, I. (2007): Use of USLE/GIS Methodology for Predicting Soil Loss in a Semiarid Agricultural Watershed. Environ. Monit. Assess. 131: 153–161. Erpul G., Şahin S., Akgöz, R., İnce K., Güden, A. Çetin, E. 2016. Türkiye Yağışlarının Özellikleri ve Yenilenmiş Evrensel Toprak Kayıpları Eşitliği (YETKE) R Faktörü. Çölleşme ve Erozyonla Mücadele Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları. ISBN:978-605-4610-93-8. Erpul G., Şahin S., İnce K., Küçümen A., Akdağ M.A., Demirtaş İ., Çetin E., 2018. Türkiye Su Erozyonu Atlası. Çölleşme ve Erozyonla Mücadele Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları (ISBN: 978-605-9550-23-9). Ankara. FAO and ITPS, 2015. Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR) – Technical Summary. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, Rome, Italy. Foster, G.R., McCool, D.K., Renard, K.G., Moldenhauer, W.C., 1981. Conversion of the universal soil loss. GDPS (General Directorate of Rural Service) (1986). 1/25000 Soil Map of Ankara, Turkey. Digital Soil Database: Soil and Water Resources National Information Centre, Turkey. Hacisalihoğlu S., "Variations Of Measured And Simulated Soil-Loss Amounts In A Semiarid Area In Turkey", ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, vol.165, pp.255-262, 2010. Karaburun, A., Demirci, A. ve Karakuyu, M. 2009. Erozyon tahmininde CBS tabanlı rusle metodunun kullanılması: büyükçekmece örneği, 3. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi CBS Sempozyumu CBS ve Bilgi Teknolojileri 10-11 Aralık, İstanbul. Lee S. 2004. Soil erosion assessment and its verification using the universal soil loss equation and geographic information system: a case study at Boun, Korea. Environ Geol 45:457-465. Madenoğlu, S., Şahin, S., Pınar, M.Ö. and Erpul, G. 2018. The effect of sustainable soil/land management on erosion and dam safety. 5th International Dam Safety Congress, Istanbul-Turkey. Moore ID, Burch G. J. (1986a) Modelling erosion and deposition. Topographic effects Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 29:1624–1630 1640. Moore ID, Burch G. J. (1986b) Physical basis of the length-slope factor in the universal soil loss equation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1294– 1298 Ogawa S, Saito G, Mino N, Uch Da S, Khan NM, Shafiq M (1997) Estimation of soil erosion using USLE and Landsat TM in Pakistan, GIS development. Net, ACRS, pp 1–5. Özcan A.U., Uzun O., Başaran M., Erpul G., Akşit S. and Palancıoğlu H.M. 2015. Soil Erosion Risk Assessment for Volcano Cone of Alidaği Mountain by Using Usle/Rusle, GIS and Geostatistics. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, Volume 24 – No 6. 2015. Panagos, P. et al. (2015). The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy 54, 438–447. Panagos, P., Borrelli, P., Meusburger, K., Yu, B., Klik, A., Lim, K.J., Yang, J. E., Ni, J., Miao, C., Chattopadhyay, N., Sadeghi, S.H., Hazbavi, Z., Zabihi, M., Larionov, G. A., Krasnov, S.F., Gorobets, A.V., Levi, Y., Erpul, G., Birkel, C., Hoyos, N., Naipal, V., Oliveira, P. T. S., Bonilla, C. A., Meddi, M., Nel, W., Al-Dashti, H., Boni, M., Diodato, N., Van Oost, K., Nearing, M. and Ballabio, C. 2017. Global rainfall erosivity assessment based on high-temporal resolution rainfall records. 7: 4175 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-04282-8. Pınar, M.Ö., Şahin, S., Madenoğlu, S. and Erpul, G. 2018. Determining Severe Erosion Affected Areas and Estimation Reservoir Sediment Load in Derinöz Dam Basin. 5th International Symposium of Dam Safety (27-31/10/2018). Istanbul-Turkey. Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Weesies, G. A., McCool, D. K., & Yoder, D. C. (1997). Predicting soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation RUSLE (p. 404). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 703, Government Printing Office, SSOP, Washington, D.C., ISBN 0-16-048938-5. Römkens, M. J. M., R. A. Young, J. W. A. Poesen, D. K. McCool, S. A. El‐Swaify, and J. M. Bradford. 1997. Soil erodibility factor (K). In Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) 65‐99. K. G. Renard et al., eds. Washington, D.C.: USDA. Römkens, M. J. M., S. N. Prasad, and J. W. A. Poesen. 1986. Soil erodibility and properties. In Proc. of the 13th Congress of theIntl. Soil Science Society 5: 492‐504. Saygin S.D., Ozcan A.U., Basaran M. et al. 2014. The combined RUSLE/SDR approach integrated with GIS and geostatistics to estimate annual sediment flux rates in the semi-arid catchment, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 71:1605-1618. Topçu, P. and Erpul, G. 2017. Climate Change and Sustainable Soil Management (SSM). Türk Coğrafya Kurumu (TCK) 75. Yıl Uluslararası Kongresi, 654-660. Torri, D., Poesen, J., Borselli, L. (1997) Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using a global dataset. Catena 31, 1–22. Torri, D., Poesen, J., Borselli, L. (2002) Corrigendum to ‘‘Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using a global dataset’’ [Catena 31(1997): 1–22] and to ‘‘Erratum to Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using a global dataset. [Catena 32(1998):307–308]’’. Catena 46, 309–310. Tunç, E, Schröder D (2010a). Ankara’nın Batısındaki Tarım Topraklarında USLE ile Erozyon Boyutunun Tespiti, Ekoloji Dergisi 19, 75(1): 58-63. Tunç, E., Schröder, D. (2010b). Vergleichen der Bodenerosion von Landwirtschaftlich Genutzten Flaechen in Mittelanatolien und Rheinland-Pfalz. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 47(1): 11-20. Wischmeier et all. (1971) A soil Erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites. J Soil Sci Water Conserv 26(5):189–193. Wischmeier, W.H., Smith, D.D. (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses–a guide for conservation planning. USDA, Agricultural Handbook, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC., pp. 537. Yuksel, A., Gundogan, R., Akay., A.E. 2008. Using the remote sensing and GIS technology for erosion risk mapping of Kartalkaya Dam watershed in Kahramanmaras, Turkey.