The document provides an overview of topics related to ethics that will be covered in a first year ethics course, including different ethical theories and how students will be assessed. It also includes sample exam questions testing understanding of divine command theory, which holds that morality is determined by God's commands, and the Euthyphro dilemma, a famous challenge to this view. Students are instructed to use the material to create an individual learning plan for ethics.
Divine command theory is a meta-ethical theory which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God. The theory asserts that what is moral is determined by what God commands, and that to be moral is to follow his commands.
Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher born in 1724 who developed the deontological ethical theory of Kantianism. Some of Kant's most important concepts included the categorical imperative which holds that moral actions are those done from duty in accordance with universal moral rules. For an action to have moral worth, it must be done from duty rather than inclination. Kant also believed that humans have free will and are ends in themselves, never to be used solely as a means to another end.
The document discusses various aspects of conscience, including its role in making moral judgments and decisions. It defines conscience as an individual's inner voice that helps them discern right from wrong based on objective moral norms. The document outlines the different elements, moments, and levels of conscience. It emphasizes the importance of forming one's conscience through faith, prayer, studying teachings of the Church, and examining one's experiences. Both sincerity and correctness of conscience are important.
Aquinas' natural law theory holds that humans have an innate ability to reason which allows them to discern moral truths and understand their purpose as given by God. According to Aquinas, natural law establishes absolute moral rules called primary precepts related to worshipping God, orderly society, reproduction, learning, and defending life. Secondary precepts provide more specific guidance that allows for flexibility in extreme cases. Virtues like prudence, justice, fortitude and temperance help fulfill human nature and avoid sin. Interior acts involve good actions with good motives, while exterior acts have good actions but wrong motives.
Virtue ethics is an approach to ethics which emphasizes the character of the moral agent, rather than rules or consequences, as the key element of ethical thinking.
Meta-ethics examines what is meant when we use ethical terms like "good", "bad", "right", and "wrong". It does not tell us how to act, but rather explores the meaning and origin of moral language. The document outlines several meta-ethical theories, including intuitionism (ethical truths are known intuitively), emotivism (moral statements express attitudes), and prescriptivism (morality involves universal principles). It traces the development of meta-ethical thought over time and how different philosophers have approached understanding ethics.
Ethical intuitionism holds that objective moral truths exist independently of human beings and can be discovered through moral intuition. Intuitionism posits that intuitive ability is innate and shared among all moral agents. However, intuition requires a mature mind and may differ depending on factors like culture, so intuitive "truths" are not infallible. Both G.E. Moore and H.A. Prichard were proponents of intuitionism, believing that moral obligations are recognized through intuition rather than defined rationally. While intuitionism allows for objective moral values, it faces challenges in providing proof of intuition and in resolving conflicts between differing intuitions.
Divine command theory is a meta-ethical theory which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God. The theory asserts that what is moral is determined by what God commands, and that to be moral is to follow his commands.
Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher born in 1724 who developed the deontological ethical theory of Kantianism. Some of Kant's most important concepts included the categorical imperative which holds that moral actions are those done from duty in accordance with universal moral rules. For an action to have moral worth, it must be done from duty rather than inclination. Kant also believed that humans have free will and are ends in themselves, never to be used solely as a means to another end.
The document discusses various aspects of conscience, including its role in making moral judgments and decisions. It defines conscience as an individual's inner voice that helps them discern right from wrong based on objective moral norms. The document outlines the different elements, moments, and levels of conscience. It emphasizes the importance of forming one's conscience through faith, prayer, studying teachings of the Church, and examining one's experiences. Both sincerity and correctness of conscience are important.
Aquinas' natural law theory holds that humans have an innate ability to reason which allows them to discern moral truths and understand their purpose as given by God. According to Aquinas, natural law establishes absolute moral rules called primary precepts related to worshipping God, orderly society, reproduction, learning, and defending life. Secondary precepts provide more specific guidance that allows for flexibility in extreme cases. Virtues like prudence, justice, fortitude and temperance help fulfill human nature and avoid sin. Interior acts involve good actions with good motives, while exterior acts have good actions but wrong motives.
Virtue ethics is an approach to ethics which emphasizes the character of the moral agent, rather than rules or consequences, as the key element of ethical thinking.
Meta-ethics examines what is meant when we use ethical terms like "good", "bad", "right", and "wrong". It does not tell us how to act, but rather explores the meaning and origin of moral language. The document outlines several meta-ethical theories, including intuitionism (ethical truths are known intuitively), emotivism (moral statements express attitudes), and prescriptivism (morality involves universal principles). It traces the development of meta-ethical thought over time and how different philosophers have approached understanding ethics.
Ethical intuitionism holds that objective moral truths exist independently of human beings and can be discovered through moral intuition. Intuitionism posits that intuitive ability is innate and shared among all moral agents. However, intuition requires a mature mind and may differ depending on factors like culture, so intuitive "truths" are not infallible. Both G.E. Moore and H.A. Prichard were proponents of intuitionism, believing that moral obligations are recognized through intuition rather than defined rationally. While intuitionism allows for objective moral values, it faces challenges in providing proof of intuition and in resolving conflicts between differing intuitions.
Ethics is the philosophical study of morality and right and wrong conduct. It encompasses theories of what constitutes a good life and the principles that govern behavior for individuals and groups. There are several branches of ethics, including meta-ethics which examines the meaning and justification of ethical statements, normative ethics which develops theories of right and wrong action, and applied ethics which deals with real-life ethical situations and dilemmas. The major theories in normative ethics are deontological ethics, which focuses on duties and rules, teleological ethics like utilitarianism which focuses on outcomes and consequences, and virtue ethics which focuses on character.
Topic: DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICAL THEORY
Contents:
A. Historical Origin
Early beginning of human civilization
• The word of the king is the law
Deontological
Greek word “dein” or “deon” meaning “To be obligated” or simply “duty”
B.Kants’ Major Contribution to Deontological Theory
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
• Avid defender of deontological theory
• Contributed as many important and brilliant ideas to the philosophical study of ethics
C.The Good Will: The Core of Kant’s Ethics
Morality of an action lies on the inner motive rather than the external effects
Kants’ ethics primarily based on good will
Duty must be done out of pure reverence to the moral law
D.Duty over Inclination
“A person is only acting morally only when he suppresses his feelings and inclinations and does that which he is obliged to do”
Inclination
means doing the things that one’s feels like doing, and thus no obligation exists.
Example:
Helping your neighbor to fix her flat tire.
• Three possible reasons of helping:
1) Expectation of the reward-immoral
2) Pity-immoral
3) Duty-moral
1 is done out of desire to get a reward and 2 is done out of emotion thus, the acts are considered immoral. On the other hand, 3 is done out of obligation and this makes the act moral.
E.Duty is Superior to Happiness
“Our duties cannot consist simply in following rules that promote pleasure and avoidance of pain as the utilitarian’s claim, since that would make right actions depend upon consequences, on how well they satisfied our desires”
Example:
1) Lying
2) Breaking promise
The above examples are immoral actions not because it can create bad consequences but because these are wrong in itself.
F.The Categorical Imperative: The Universalizability Principle
“Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law”
Maxim is a personal and subjective guiding principle
We must universalize our moral judgement
G.The Principle of Humanity (Respect for Persons)
Also known as ’Principle of Ends’
Concerns respect for the dignity of persons
Rational beings are ends in themselves
Do not treat others as means
H.Autonomy of The Will (Kingdom of Ends)
“For without personal autonomy, Morality becomes an impossibility”
Autonomous will
The will becomes autonomous when the genuinely moral actions are chosen:
• Freely
• Rationally
• By The Self (Autonomously)
Kingdom of ends
It is a moral universe of the moral beings in which:
• Respect for Intrinsic Worth
• Respect for Value of All Persons
is exercised by everyone.
Ethics is the philosophical study of morality and seeks to understand concepts like good, evil, right, wrong and justice. There are differing views on the source and nature of morality. Objectivists believe morality is objective and stems from supernatural beings or natural laws, while subjectivists see it as subjective and based on human rationality. Major ethical theories discussed include utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics and ethical relativism. Different theories provide various approaches to determining what constitutes moral and ethical behavior.
I. The document discusses virtue ethics, defining it as focusing on one's character and the virtues that shape ethical behavior.
II. It explains that virtues are developed over time through experiences, reflection, and interactions with others, forming habits of doing what is right.
III. Virtue ethics is important in business contexts as employees with strong virtues like courage, wisdom and fairness will make ethical decisions that help organizations achieve their goals.
Kant was a highly influential German philosopher from the 18th century. He grew up in Prussia and had a strict upbringing, excelling in school from a young age. After his father's death, he worked as a tutor for many years before returning to university to teach for over 15 years. Kant developed groundbreaking works in epistemology, ethics, and metaphysics. Though controversial for his unconventional religious views, he was considered one of the greatest modern philosophers. Kant lived a regimented life dedicated to his work until his death in 1804 at age 79 from a degenerative illness.
Deontological ethics focuses on adherence to rules of duty, rather than consequences. Actions are judged based on whether they conform to moral norms, regardless of outcomes. Key aspects of deontological ethics include: intentions matter more than consequences; actions can be right or wrong based on adherence to principles like duties, rights, and maxims. Examples of deontological theories include divine command theory and Kantian ethics. Deontological ethics differs from consequentialism, which judges actions based on their outcomes, and virtue ethics, which focuses on character development.
Virtue ethics focuses not so much on principles or the consequences of action, nor even the action itself so much as on the agent, the person who performs the action, in the light of the circumstances and all of his or her other actions. The focus is on the person’s character, or alternatively, on those traits of character expressed in this and other actions, his or her virtues.
Aristotle’s virtue ethics The most famous virtue ethicist, and in many ways still the starting point for most virtue ethicists, is the great Greek philosopher Aristotle (384–322 BCE). In his Nicomachean Ethics (1954), Aristotle laid out a system of virtue ethics which still remains the starting point, if not the model, for most virtue ethicists. A virtue (areté which can also be translated as “excellence”) for Aristotle was the mean between the extremes.
This document provides an overview of virtue ethics, including:
- The basics of virtue ethics as developed by Aristotle, focusing on developing good character traits rather than specific actions.
- Jesus' teachings on the Beatitudes as an example of virtues.
- Challenges to virtue ethics, such as it not providing practical moral guidance, issues with cultural relativism, and virtues potentially being used to justify immoral acts.
Relationship between morality_and_religionTheAdipose
This document discusses the relationship between religion and morality from three perspectives:
1) Some argue morality depends on religion, deriving from sacred texts and religious authorities. However, others critique scriptural interpretations and question if fear motivates true goodness.
2) Others see morality as independent from religion, influenced instead by social conditioning. Sacred texts are culturally relative and stories like Abraham/Isaac challenge intuitive morality.
3) Some like Dawkins and Nietzsche oppose religion, seeing it as irrational and denying humanity's potential. Religion is argued to induce guilt rather than true morality.
Business Ethics - Metaphysics of Morals by Immanuel KantMufaddal Nullwala
Business Ethics - Book Review - Metaphysics of Morals by Immanuel Kant.
1) Biography of Immanuel Kant
2) Kant’s Concept on Morality
3) Chapter 1 – Goodwill
4) Chapter 1 – The Notion of Duty and Maxim
5) Chapter 2 - Transition from popular Moral Philosophy to the Metaphysic of Morals
6) Chapter 3 - Transition from the Metaphysics of Morals to the critique of pure practical reason
The document is a series of copyright statements by Lawrence M. Hinman dated 08/18/15. It includes 30 copyright statements numbered consecutively from 11 to 30. The final two paragraphs discuss Kant's view that morality must be fair and evenhanded, and that following a Kantian path offers a kind of moral safety in an uncertain world.
At the end of the lesson, you should be able to:
1. identify the moral challenges of globalization
2. compare responses to shared moral dilemmas of baby boomers and millennials
3. state qualities of the filinnials
4. construct a plan for the coping with the challenges of globalization .
1. An action has moral worth only if it is done from a sense of duty and obligation, rather than from a desire for consequences or personal preferences.
2. Deontological ethics judges the morality of an action based on adherence to rules of duty and respect for persons, rather than consideration of an action's outcomes or consequences.
3. Immanuel Kant's deontological theory holds that the sole basis for determining the moral worth of an action is a good will and acting from a sense of duty in accordance with moral laws that any rational person would accept.
Conscience is described as our lived knowledge of good and evil, prompting us to judge our actions as morally right or wrong. It is seen as the inner core where we encounter God and recognize our moral obligations. The Bible references conscience indirectly through concepts like heart, mind, and loins. In the New Testament, conscience is portrayed as a God-given capacity for self-evaluation, a witness, and servant to our value systems. Christian theologians see conscience as the place we encounter God, with Augustine viewing it as the divine center where we are addressed by God.
The document discusses several frameworks for categorizing and thinking about ethics, including deontology vs. teleology (ethics based on duty vs. consequences). It provides examples of prominent philosophers who exemplified different approaches, such as Immanuel Kant supporting deontology by focusing on duty and the categorical imperative, and John Stuart Mill supporting teleology as a utilitarian who believed ethics is determined by producing the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The document also discusses other ethics classifications like direct vs. indirect views and pragmatic vs. humanistic theories.
This chapter examines the nature of morality and business ethics. It discusses the difference between moral and non-moral standards, and how morality relates to concepts like religion, ethical relativism, and personal values. The chapter also explores the importance of moral principles, individual integrity, and responsibility in business contexts. Sources of morality are analyzed, including the roles of religion and ethical relativism.
Ethics is the branch of philosophy that deals with questions about morality and values. It examines what actions are right or wrong and how we should decide which values to pursue. Ethics helps us resolve conflicts about values and determine the proper course of action for humans. It provides guidance for organizing our goals and acting successfully to accomplish our most important values. The study of ethics explores different types of values like intrinsic and extrinsic values, and considers how ethics relates to other domains like religions and science.
This document provides an overview of morality and ethics. It defines philosophy and explains how ethics relates to the study of morality. It outlines two approaches to studying morality - descriptive and philosophical. The philosophical approach includes normative ethics, which deals with standards of behavior, and meta-ethics, which analyzes the logic and reasoning behind ethical systems. The document also discusses where morality comes from, including objective theories based on supernatural beings or natural laws, and subjective theories that see morality as residing within humans. It explores the relationships between morality, law, religion and culture.
This document discusses several perspectives on the relationship between religion and morality. It outlines positive and negative aspects of religious ethics, as well as issues debated by theologians and philosophers. The document also describes Tillich's three types of ethics, divine command theory, scriptural ethics, natural law theory, and criticisms of religious morality. It analyzes moral arguments for God's existence put forth by Aquinas and Kant.
It is surprising that people who say they are Christians, when asked how does change you from your first point of becoming a Christian, they often do not know. They answer when asked with all sorts of 'spiritual' answers. But how do we change, what is the process of change. Scripture (The Bible) does actually tell us what is the process!
Philosophical arguments for the link between god and moralityRobinHH
This document outlines several philosophical arguments for linking morality and the existence of God, including arguments from Aquinas, Kant, and Socrates. It discusses premises of the arguments, potential problems with the premises, and criticisms of the conclusions. Key points addressed include the divine command theory, the need for an ideal judge to determine right and wrong, and the Euthyphro dilemma of whether God determines what is good or loves what is intrinsically good. The document aims to comprehensively survey the philosophical debate on this issue.
Ethics is the philosophical study of morality and right and wrong conduct. It encompasses theories of what constitutes a good life and the principles that govern behavior for individuals and groups. There are several branches of ethics, including meta-ethics which examines the meaning and justification of ethical statements, normative ethics which develops theories of right and wrong action, and applied ethics which deals with real-life ethical situations and dilemmas. The major theories in normative ethics are deontological ethics, which focuses on duties and rules, teleological ethics like utilitarianism which focuses on outcomes and consequences, and virtue ethics which focuses on character.
Topic: DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICAL THEORY
Contents:
A. Historical Origin
Early beginning of human civilization
• The word of the king is the law
Deontological
Greek word “dein” or “deon” meaning “To be obligated” or simply “duty”
B.Kants’ Major Contribution to Deontological Theory
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
• Avid defender of deontological theory
• Contributed as many important and brilliant ideas to the philosophical study of ethics
C.The Good Will: The Core of Kant’s Ethics
Morality of an action lies on the inner motive rather than the external effects
Kants’ ethics primarily based on good will
Duty must be done out of pure reverence to the moral law
D.Duty over Inclination
“A person is only acting morally only when he suppresses his feelings and inclinations and does that which he is obliged to do”
Inclination
means doing the things that one’s feels like doing, and thus no obligation exists.
Example:
Helping your neighbor to fix her flat tire.
• Three possible reasons of helping:
1) Expectation of the reward-immoral
2) Pity-immoral
3) Duty-moral
1 is done out of desire to get a reward and 2 is done out of emotion thus, the acts are considered immoral. On the other hand, 3 is done out of obligation and this makes the act moral.
E.Duty is Superior to Happiness
“Our duties cannot consist simply in following rules that promote pleasure and avoidance of pain as the utilitarian’s claim, since that would make right actions depend upon consequences, on how well they satisfied our desires”
Example:
1) Lying
2) Breaking promise
The above examples are immoral actions not because it can create bad consequences but because these are wrong in itself.
F.The Categorical Imperative: The Universalizability Principle
“Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law”
Maxim is a personal and subjective guiding principle
We must universalize our moral judgement
G.The Principle of Humanity (Respect for Persons)
Also known as ’Principle of Ends’
Concerns respect for the dignity of persons
Rational beings are ends in themselves
Do not treat others as means
H.Autonomy of The Will (Kingdom of Ends)
“For without personal autonomy, Morality becomes an impossibility”
Autonomous will
The will becomes autonomous when the genuinely moral actions are chosen:
• Freely
• Rationally
• By The Self (Autonomously)
Kingdom of ends
It is a moral universe of the moral beings in which:
• Respect for Intrinsic Worth
• Respect for Value of All Persons
is exercised by everyone.
Ethics is the philosophical study of morality and seeks to understand concepts like good, evil, right, wrong and justice. There are differing views on the source and nature of morality. Objectivists believe morality is objective and stems from supernatural beings or natural laws, while subjectivists see it as subjective and based on human rationality. Major ethical theories discussed include utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics and ethical relativism. Different theories provide various approaches to determining what constitutes moral and ethical behavior.
I. The document discusses virtue ethics, defining it as focusing on one's character and the virtues that shape ethical behavior.
II. It explains that virtues are developed over time through experiences, reflection, and interactions with others, forming habits of doing what is right.
III. Virtue ethics is important in business contexts as employees with strong virtues like courage, wisdom and fairness will make ethical decisions that help organizations achieve their goals.
Kant was a highly influential German philosopher from the 18th century. He grew up in Prussia and had a strict upbringing, excelling in school from a young age. After his father's death, he worked as a tutor for many years before returning to university to teach for over 15 years. Kant developed groundbreaking works in epistemology, ethics, and metaphysics. Though controversial for his unconventional religious views, he was considered one of the greatest modern philosophers. Kant lived a regimented life dedicated to his work until his death in 1804 at age 79 from a degenerative illness.
Deontological ethics focuses on adherence to rules of duty, rather than consequences. Actions are judged based on whether they conform to moral norms, regardless of outcomes. Key aspects of deontological ethics include: intentions matter more than consequences; actions can be right or wrong based on adherence to principles like duties, rights, and maxims. Examples of deontological theories include divine command theory and Kantian ethics. Deontological ethics differs from consequentialism, which judges actions based on their outcomes, and virtue ethics, which focuses on character development.
Virtue ethics focuses not so much on principles or the consequences of action, nor even the action itself so much as on the agent, the person who performs the action, in the light of the circumstances and all of his or her other actions. The focus is on the person’s character, or alternatively, on those traits of character expressed in this and other actions, his or her virtues.
Aristotle’s virtue ethics The most famous virtue ethicist, and in many ways still the starting point for most virtue ethicists, is the great Greek philosopher Aristotle (384–322 BCE). In his Nicomachean Ethics (1954), Aristotle laid out a system of virtue ethics which still remains the starting point, if not the model, for most virtue ethicists. A virtue (areté which can also be translated as “excellence”) for Aristotle was the mean between the extremes.
This document provides an overview of virtue ethics, including:
- The basics of virtue ethics as developed by Aristotle, focusing on developing good character traits rather than specific actions.
- Jesus' teachings on the Beatitudes as an example of virtues.
- Challenges to virtue ethics, such as it not providing practical moral guidance, issues with cultural relativism, and virtues potentially being used to justify immoral acts.
Relationship between morality_and_religionTheAdipose
This document discusses the relationship between religion and morality from three perspectives:
1) Some argue morality depends on religion, deriving from sacred texts and religious authorities. However, others critique scriptural interpretations and question if fear motivates true goodness.
2) Others see morality as independent from religion, influenced instead by social conditioning. Sacred texts are culturally relative and stories like Abraham/Isaac challenge intuitive morality.
3) Some like Dawkins and Nietzsche oppose religion, seeing it as irrational and denying humanity's potential. Religion is argued to induce guilt rather than true morality.
Business Ethics - Metaphysics of Morals by Immanuel KantMufaddal Nullwala
Business Ethics - Book Review - Metaphysics of Morals by Immanuel Kant.
1) Biography of Immanuel Kant
2) Kant’s Concept on Morality
3) Chapter 1 – Goodwill
4) Chapter 1 – The Notion of Duty and Maxim
5) Chapter 2 - Transition from popular Moral Philosophy to the Metaphysic of Morals
6) Chapter 3 - Transition from the Metaphysics of Morals to the critique of pure practical reason
The document is a series of copyright statements by Lawrence M. Hinman dated 08/18/15. It includes 30 copyright statements numbered consecutively from 11 to 30. The final two paragraphs discuss Kant's view that morality must be fair and evenhanded, and that following a Kantian path offers a kind of moral safety in an uncertain world.
At the end of the lesson, you should be able to:
1. identify the moral challenges of globalization
2. compare responses to shared moral dilemmas of baby boomers and millennials
3. state qualities of the filinnials
4. construct a plan for the coping with the challenges of globalization .
1. An action has moral worth only if it is done from a sense of duty and obligation, rather than from a desire for consequences or personal preferences.
2. Deontological ethics judges the morality of an action based on adherence to rules of duty and respect for persons, rather than consideration of an action's outcomes or consequences.
3. Immanuel Kant's deontological theory holds that the sole basis for determining the moral worth of an action is a good will and acting from a sense of duty in accordance with moral laws that any rational person would accept.
Conscience is described as our lived knowledge of good and evil, prompting us to judge our actions as morally right or wrong. It is seen as the inner core where we encounter God and recognize our moral obligations. The Bible references conscience indirectly through concepts like heart, mind, and loins. In the New Testament, conscience is portrayed as a God-given capacity for self-evaluation, a witness, and servant to our value systems. Christian theologians see conscience as the place we encounter God, with Augustine viewing it as the divine center where we are addressed by God.
The document discusses several frameworks for categorizing and thinking about ethics, including deontology vs. teleology (ethics based on duty vs. consequences). It provides examples of prominent philosophers who exemplified different approaches, such as Immanuel Kant supporting deontology by focusing on duty and the categorical imperative, and John Stuart Mill supporting teleology as a utilitarian who believed ethics is determined by producing the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The document also discusses other ethics classifications like direct vs. indirect views and pragmatic vs. humanistic theories.
This chapter examines the nature of morality and business ethics. It discusses the difference between moral and non-moral standards, and how morality relates to concepts like religion, ethical relativism, and personal values. The chapter also explores the importance of moral principles, individual integrity, and responsibility in business contexts. Sources of morality are analyzed, including the roles of religion and ethical relativism.
Ethics is the branch of philosophy that deals with questions about morality and values. It examines what actions are right or wrong and how we should decide which values to pursue. Ethics helps us resolve conflicts about values and determine the proper course of action for humans. It provides guidance for organizing our goals and acting successfully to accomplish our most important values. The study of ethics explores different types of values like intrinsic and extrinsic values, and considers how ethics relates to other domains like religions and science.
This document provides an overview of morality and ethics. It defines philosophy and explains how ethics relates to the study of morality. It outlines two approaches to studying morality - descriptive and philosophical. The philosophical approach includes normative ethics, which deals with standards of behavior, and meta-ethics, which analyzes the logic and reasoning behind ethical systems. The document also discusses where morality comes from, including objective theories based on supernatural beings or natural laws, and subjective theories that see morality as residing within humans. It explores the relationships between morality, law, religion and culture.
This document discusses several perspectives on the relationship between religion and morality. It outlines positive and negative aspects of religious ethics, as well as issues debated by theologians and philosophers. The document also describes Tillich's three types of ethics, divine command theory, scriptural ethics, natural law theory, and criticisms of religious morality. It analyzes moral arguments for God's existence put forth by Aquinas and Kant.
It is surprising that people who say they are Christians, when asked how does change you from your first point of becoming a Christian, they often do not know. They answer when asked with all sorts of 'spiritual' answers. But how do we change, what is the process of change. Scripture (The Bible) does actually tell us what is the process!
Philosophical arguments for the link between god and moralityRobinHH
This document outlines several philosophical arguments for linking morality and the existence of God, including arguments from Aquinas, Kant, and Socrates. It discusses premises of the arguments, potential problems with the premises, and criticisms of the conclusions. Key points addressed include the divine command theory, the need for an ideal judge to determine right and wrong, and the Euthyphro dilemma of whether God determines what is good or loves what is intrinsically good. The document aims to comprehensively survey the philosophical debate on this issue.
The document presents an overview of ethics and principles mentioned in the Holy Bible. It begins with an introduction to the Bible, explaining that it is a collection of sacred texts in Judaism and Christianity that tells the story of God and his plan for humanity. The presentation then defines management according to the Bible as stewardship, where managers are responsible for something entrusted to them. It lists several Christian values and principles that can form the basis for a corporate code of ethics, such as caring for the needy, fair treatment of employees, and avoiding dishonest practices. The conclusion stresses that businesses need a strong moral framework or ethics to support them and achieve success.
This document discusses the relationship between religion and ethics. It explores different perspectives on whether morality is dependent on religion such as the Divine Command Theory and the Independence Thesis. The document also examines arguments for and against the idea that religion enhances moral life or is even contrary to morality. Key figures discussed include Kant, Russell, Hume, Nowell-Smith, and Rachels.
This document discusses ethics and discernment in Christian decision making. It provides definitions of ethics and explains that the ultimate foundation of Christian ethics is God and the Bible. It outlines an 11-step Ignatian method for discernment and decision making that involves prayerfully identifying the decision, gathering information, evaluating pros and cons, observing one's will, and asking God for consolation before making the decision. The goal is to choose the alternative that will best serve God and one's authentic self through a prayerful process of discernment.
Religion and Morality discusses several issues in the relationship between religion and morality, including whether religion is a good source of morality and if religious morality is still relevant. Theologian Paul Tillich identified three types of ethics: theonomy (given by God), heteronomy (imposed externally) and autonomy (developed internally). While some argue morality comes directly from religious texts like the Bible, others note these texts can be ambiguous and inconsistent guides for ethics. Religious morality has also faced criticisms for potentially encouraging closed-mindedness, violence, and contradictory moral commands across faiths.
This presentation examines the moral argument for God and presents evidence that shows if God does not exist, then neither do objective moral values and duties.
Science and Religion: Naturalism and humanismJohn Wilkins
John Wilkins gives a lecture on naturalism and how to approach explanations without committing to assumptions about God or other non-natural concepts. He argues that as a naturalist, one need only consider natural or scientific "foils" or alternatives when providing explanations. Non-natural concepts like God or the soul do not need to be granted as viable contrasts. Wilkins also addresses how naturalistic accounts can explain phenomena like the mind, morality, meaning, religion and more without needing to appeal to transcendence or concepts beyond the natural world.
This document discusses different approaches to Christian ethics in a postmodern world. It analyzes cultural relativism, situation ethics, and behaviorism as inadequate options before arguing that ethical absolutes grounded in biblical authority provide the best framework. The document also examines four models of how Christians should relate to culture: the separational model, identificational model, transformational model, and incarnational model. It concludes that the incarnational model, exemplified by Jesus, offers the best synthesis by living in the world but not being of it to transform culture from within through adherence to biblical principles.
I do not have enough context to answer the open-book quiz questions. My role is to summarize the key points of the provided document, not to answer specific questions about its content.
The document summarizes key points about the theology of the Westminster Confession regarding the Holy Scripture:
- The Bible is necessary, holy, inspired, complete, and authoritative. It is the final and definitive revelation from God.
- The Bible contains 66 books - 39 in the Old Testament and 27 in the New Testament.
- The Bible is sufficient for all matters of salvation, doctrine, and the Christian life. While it needs the Holy Spirit's illumination, it is clear and authentic.
- All religious controversies must be decided by the infallible standard of the Bible alone. Creeds and confessions should relate to and not contradict what is in the Bible.
c 3Last name of student 7Submitted by Submitted to A.docxjasoninnes20
c: 3
Last name of student: 7
Submitted by:
Submitted to: AMU
Course: Philosophy
Date: 28 July 2019
Philosophical Essay Outline
Thesis Statement: “All the good actions have been developed and taught to us by God and the whole morality that comes to us belongs to God. Hence, Divine Command teaches us morality through good actions.”
Rough draft of the introduction to an essay
In this essay, I will analyze the statement "Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?". This statement describes the epistemological problem and is related to the Divine Command Theory of morality because this theory defines the status of action on moral grounds. The philosophical implications attached to each option revolve around the wills of God and the good acts. I will analyze the statement in the light of the Divine Command Theory of morality that will help to explain all questions.
I. All moral obligations have a close connection to the Divine Command.
A. Virtue is always seen in God and the creature made by him.
B. Ethics are embedded in the creature and people can differentiate what is right and what is wrong (Evans)
C. Divine command theory is criticized by so many and this is taken as an epistemological objection.
II. few major critics think that divine theories do not indicate moral status because these critiques lack knowledge of the commands sent by God.
A. There are a risk and variety in the understanding of the commands of God.
B. The factors of uncertainty are high while interpreting the commands of God (Danaher).
C. To understand the commands of God, critical thinking is recommended.
III. The questions asked by the Socrates are highly intellectual and they are used to arouse critical thinking in human beings.
A. Socratic style is not always of a learner. He askes questions to teach others and his questions are aimed at highlighting the needs to think critically.
B. Socrates used exploratory, focused and spontaneous question and this learning highlights the needs to think on different patterns according to the nature of the thoughts (Richard Paul).
C. Religious thoughts require the more careful attention of the people and refined thinking is needed to understand the meanings of the divine commands and wills of God.
IV. Conclusion:
A. Summary of discussion:
The thoughts about the divine commands are often confused because people do not have much knowledge about the commands given by God and the wills of God. This is seen in the form of objection which is done by most of the people who do not have complete knowledge about religion. This can be developed among them through critical thinking and by asking a question which will give rise to balanced and righteous approaches.
B. Final Observation:
1
All the good acts which are based on morality come from the wills of God because God likes morality and he has also nurtured his creatures with the moral obligation and h ...
This document discusses the question of whether the existence of God can be proven or meaningfully discussed. It first examines objections from logical positivists and some modern atheists that a discourse on God is meaningless since statements about God cannot be falsified. However, it argues that when understood as a supreme, infinite, perfect being, discussions about God's existence are a "mystery" rather than a "problem." The document then explores various theories on God's existence such as theism, atheism, agnosticism, pantheism, and panentheism to lay the groundwork for demonstrating God's existence.
Yr 12 revision questions section 1 and 2philipapeters
This document contains a syllabus and review questions covering various topics related to the philosophy of religion. The topics include definitions of key terms like "God", arguments for and against God's existence, problems of evil and suffering, religious language and experiences. The review questions probe ideas around defining divinity, the diversity of views on God, atheism/agnosticism, philosophical arguments regarding God, theodicies, analyzing religious language, and assessing religious experiences.
Kant puts forward a moral argument for the existence of God based on the idea of the Summum Bonum or highest good. He argues that doing one's moral duty is meant to achieve the Summum Bonum of virtue and happiness together. However, evil in the world means this highest good may not be achieved through human efforts alone. Therefore, to give meaning to doing one's duty, the existence of God is postulated as what guarantees that the highest good is ultimately achievable.
The document provides an overview of philosophy and various philosophical concepts and thinkers. It discusses what philosophy is, including the original definition as the "love of wisdom." It summarizes some key aspects of prominent philosophers like Plato, Descartes, Locke, Nietzsche, Aquinas, and Kant. It also briefly outlines Kant's categorical imperative and discusses justice versus righteousness. The document appears to be notes for an introductory philosophy course covering foundational topics and major historical figures.
This document provides information and materials for a lesson on exploring concepts of God and religion. It includes key words, discussion prompts, and videos related to whether God exists and why some people believe while others do not. Students are asked to consider different perspectives on God's existence, define what God means to them personally, and respond to an article from a comedian expressing his desire to believe in God.
Emotivism is a meta-ethical theory that believes objective moral laws do not exist and that moral terms express personal emotional attitudes rather than factual propositions. According to A.J. Ayer, the philosopher who developed emotivism, ethical statements are neither verifiable nor analytic, but are used to express approval or disapproval in order to influence others. Emotivism faces challenges as it does not allow for basic moral principles to be established, renders ethical debate pointless, and means there can be no universal agreement on what actions are right or wrong.
Here are the answers to your questions:
1. Ethical naturalists would try to define good in terms of natural properties like happiness, pleasure, fulfilling needs/wants.
2. An 'is' refers to a statement of fact about the natural/empirical world that can be observed and verified, e.g. "grass is green".
3. An 'ought' refers to a statement of moral duty or obligation, e.g. "you ought to be kind".
4. Hume thinks we can't jump from an 'is' to an 'ought' because facts about the natural world can't logically determine moral conclusions about what we should or shouldn't do.
5. An
This document provides an overview of the ethical theory of ethical egoism. It begins by explaining that ethical egoism is a normative theory that judges actions based on self-interest rather than altruism. It notes that ethical egoism focuses on long-term self-interest rather than short-term desires. The document then discusses Max Stirner's conception of ethical egoism, in which he argued that self-interest should be the root of all actions. Finally, the document outlines some of the challenges to ethical egoism, including that it could destroy a sense of community, lead to social injustices, and be seen as a form of bigotry by prioritizing some individuals over others.
Globalisation has accelerated due to improvements in transportation and technology that have increased global flows and networks. While some places and people have benefited economically from greater integration, globalisation has also contributed to social, economic, and environmental challenges. Rising inequality, cultural tensions, and environmental degradation are issues that governments and organizations have sought to address through policies around trade, investment, migration, and sustainable development. Managing both the opportunities and risks of an increasingly interconnected world remains an ongoing challenge.
Globalisation, sustainability and localismaquinas_rs
This document discusses issues related to globalization, sustainability, and localism. It introduces the key topics to be covered, which are: understanding globalization and sustainability issues; learning about schemes to promote sustainable living; and evaluating the effectiveness of sustainability schemes and whether globalization conflicts with sustainability. The rest of the document provides further details on these topics, including discussions of local sourcing of goods, fair trade and ethical consumption, and recycling as responses to globalization and consumerism. It also examines the tensions between globalization and sustainability.
Social, environmental and political tensions caused by Globalisationaquinas_rs
Globalization has caused various social, environmental, and political tensions:
- Open borders and increased migration have led to culturally mixed societies in some places but tensions in others, as seen with the rise of extremism in Europe and issues over trans-boundary resources.
- Governments have attempted to control the spread of globalization through measures like censorship, limiting immigration, and trade protectionism.
- Some groups seek to retain their cultural identity and control over resources, while others embrace the economic benefits of globalization.
Development - inequality within and between countriesaquinas_rs
The document discusses development inequality within and between countries. It will recap indexes of development, introduce the Gini Coefficient method of measuring inequality, and analyze global development trends since 1970. Specifically, it will cover how the Gini Coefficient is used to measure income inequality within a country, trends showing globalization has created economic winners and losers between developed and developing nations, and how economic and environmental progress has differed between world regions over this time period.
Globalisation, development and the environmentaquinas_rs
This document discusses globalization, development, and the environment. It introduces several key concepts:
1. Economic measures of development, like GDP per capita, contrast with social measures like the Human Development Index which considers education and health. Environmental quality is also measured.
2. Globalization has created economic winners and losers between countries and within countries, as seen through rising income inequality measured by the Gini Coefficient.
3. Economic development and environmental management have followed different trends in different global regions since the 1970s, related to outcomes from globalization.
Cultural diffusion occurring through globalization can lead to both cultural erosion and new opportunities. While cultural erosion may result in the loss of traditional languages, foods, clothing, and lifestyles in some places, it can also increase awareness of opportunities for disadvantaged groups through channels like the Paralympic movement. Some view cultural erosion negatively and oppose globalization, worrying it will devalue local ecosystems, while others see the spread of global culture and values like democracy in a more positive light.
Globalization has led to the spread of Western culture and ideas around the world through various means. Transnational corporations, global media, tourism, and migration have all contributed to the diffusion of Western culture, influencing diets, clothing, and attitudes. While this has provided some opportunities, it has also resulted in the loss of local languages, traditions, and environmental degradation in some places. There is debate around the costs and benefits of the emergence of a more globalized culture.
The document discusses the increased scale and pace of global migration. It recaps how the global economic shift to Asia has led to more migration. The growth of megacities, fueled by rural-urban migration, has also increased economic migration. Migration to global hubs involves both elite migrants and low-skilled migrant workers moving for opportunities.
The document discusses the global shift of economic activity to Asia and the related impacts. It explains that the movement of manufacturing to countries like China and outsourcing of services to India has created both benefits like jobs and infrastructure investment, but also costs such as environmental degradation and loss of land. Some developing regions have faced major pollution and health issues from this shift, while deindustrialized areas in developed nations struggle with problems like unemployment and abandoned buildings. The global shift has created both winners and losers among people and the physical environment.
Globalization has impacted some locations and organizations more than others. The document discusses how the degree of globalization varies between countries and can be measured using indices like the KOF index and the Kearney index. Some places remain less connected due to physical, political, economic, or environmental factors that make them more "switched off" from globalization. The document aims to recap globalization's acceleration and how its uneven effects can be gauged through these indices.
Political and economic decision making have contributed significantly to the acceleration of globalization in recent decades. National governments have promoted globalization by establishing trade blocs like the EU and ASEAN to encourage free trade. International organizations such as the IMF and WTO also promote globalization through policies aimed at liberalizing trade and encouraging foreign direct investment. Finally, individual countries have established special economic zones and offered subsidies to attract foreign businesses and further increase global integration.
Globalisation has accelerated due to developments in transport, technology, and trade. In the 19th century, innovations like railways and steamships expanded trade. In the 20th century, jet aircraft and container ships further increased the flow of goods. The 21st century has seen the rapid growth of ICT, mobile phones, the internet, and social media, compressing time and space and connecting people globally. These developments have contributed to an increasingly interconnected world and a "shrinking" of distances between places.
Globalisation is a long-standing process that has accelerated due to developments in transport, communications, and business. It involves widening and deepening global connections and interdependence through increased flows of commodities, capital, information, migrants, and tourists. Rapid advances in technology over the 19th and 20th centuries, especially in transport and ICT, have contributed to greater global integration and a "shrinking world" with stronger global networks.
This document discusses how developments in transport, technology, and trade have contributed to the acceleration of globalization in recent decades. Specifically, it notes how innovations like steamships, railways, jet aircraft, and container shipping expanded trade connections in the 19th-20th centuries. In the 21st century, advances in ICT, mobile phones, the internet, and social media have further compressed time and space, driving new levels of global interconnection and integration. The document aims to teach students how globalization is a long-term process that has increasingly accelerated due to revolutionary shifts in transportation and digital technologies that have made the world smaller and more interconnected.
Globalisation has been a longstanding process that accelerated in the late 20th century due to developments in transportation and communication technologies. This included advances like railways, steamships, jet aircraft, container ships, the internet, and smartphones. These lowered communication costs and led to increased global connections and interdependence through widened flows of capital, commodities, information, tourists, and migrants moving around the world.
This document discusses several key aspects of Christianity:
1. It summarizes the two birth narratives of Jesus in Matthew and Luke and approaches to harmonizing them. It also discusses doctrines like the incarnation.
2. It analyzes different views on the resurrection of Jesus from scholars like Bultmann and Wright and what it implies about the afterlife.
3. It outlines how the Bible is viewed as a source of wisdom, moral authority, meaning/purpose, comfort, and encouragement from passages in Psalms, Genesis, and Ecclesiastes.
4. It briefly discusses the formation of the Old and New Testament canons and views on the inspiration of scripture.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Divine command theory
1. Ethics – Divine Command Theory
By the end of this lesson you
will:
• Know what topics you will
be studying for ethics in
your 1st year
• Understand how you will
be assessed for these
topics
• Applied this knowledge to
create an individual
learning plan
2.
3. Spec Check – Ethics Theme 1
Ethical Theory Ethical Language
A. Divine Command Theory D. Naturalism
B. Virtue Theory E. Intuitionism
C. Egoism F. Emotivism
4. Spec Check – Divine Command Theory
Ethical Theory Issues for Analysis
A. Divine Command Theory
Meta-Ethical theory – God as the origin and regulator
of morality; right or wrong as objective truths based
on God’s will or command. Moral goodness is
achieved by compiling with divine command; divine
command a requirement of God’s omnipotence;
divine command as an objective meta-physical
foundation for morality. Robert Adam’s ‘modified
divine command theory’
The Euthyphro dilemma, the arbitrariness problem,
pluralism objection
Is morality what God commands?
5. Key Question of the Week
• A) Explain Divine Command Theory (20)
• B) ‘Morality is what God commands’. Discuss this view (30)
6. What is ethics?
• Ethics:
• Moral principles that govern a person's behaviour or the conducting
of an activity.
• The branch of knowledge that deals with moral principles.
• At its simplest, ethics is a system of moral principles. They affect how
people make decisions and lead their lives.
7. Re-Cap
• Imagine an ethical dilemma whereby a woman in pain with a terminal
condition wants to end her life through euthanasia
• What would a teleologist say?
• What would a deontologist say?
• What would a relativist say?
• What would an absolutist say?
8. Reading Task – Group Task
• Read the first entry in your reading logs entitled ‘Divine Command
Ethics’ in the Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy
Make notes on the above attributes
We will feed these back as a class
9. Applying Divine Command Ethics
• Use your Bibles to look up Exodus 20
• Look at these commandments and decide with your partner how a
follower of Christian Divine Command Ethics would approach the
ethical dilemmas on your card sort. We will keep referring to the
same ethical dilemmas throughout the course.
10. • The 10
commandments are
found in the OLD
TESTAMENT
• They were given to
Moses from God
• Cartoon on 10
commandments
11. Divine Command Ethics
• According to Divine command ethics what is good is what God commands
• Because God is omnibenevolent, he has to desire good actions
• WHY? Because God is Omnipotent
• Followers of God can then use their Holy Scripture to follow the commands that God has
set them
• Muslims will follow the Qu’Ran
• Jews will follow the Torah
• Christians will follow the Bible
• As all of these books will contain slightly different rules, this means that what God
commands will change based on your religion. However, each religion will think that their
interpretation of God’s commands is indeed the objectively true command.
• By this, if we were to re-do the card sort activity using a different set of commandments
from a different Holy Book, we might find a different set of answers
12. Divine Command Ethics
• For many believers, because God is all powerful, whatever he
commands must therefore also be universally true.
• Therefore, because God is the most powerful being, if he declares
that it is wrong to commit adultery, us as mortal humans should
never commit adultery.
13. Meta-Ethical theory – God as the origin and
regulator of morality;
• Point: Divine Command Theory states that God is the origin and regulator
of morality.
• Explain: This means that when an agent is deciding what is right or wrong,
they should look towards God’s commands as in the scripture. It is
particularly important for followers of the book (Jews, Christians, Muslims,
who believe that God has commanded what is good in the Old Testament.
• Example: For example, Exodus 20, otherwise known as the 10
commandments, are the most upheld moral codes in Divine Command
Theory, where people learn that it is wrong to lie, steal and kill.
• Link: This shows that God is the origin of goodness because he dictated
the 10 commandments to Abraham and also set out regulations in other
scripture. The main regulation is if these commandments are not followed,
you will go to hell.
14. Right or wrong as objective truths based on
God’s will or command.
• Point: In Divine Command Theory, what is right or wrong is an objective
truth.
• Explain: This means that, the commands must be true for all people,
regardless of opinion, and true within their own right. This is because God
is omnipotent (all powerful) and omniscient (all knowing), so as the most
powerful being, only God can dictate how humans should behave.
• Example: For example, if a human wanted to kill for revenge, this would
not be allowed, as this would be a subjective decision. God has objectively
stated ‘thou shalt not kill’, so this would not be allowed.
• Link: Therefore, what God command shouldn't be questioned as it is
objective and true for all time.
15. Divine command a requirement of God’s
omnipotence
• TASK: Now complete your own paragraph structure based on the
point above
16. Assess & Peer Mark
• 1. What is Divine Command Ethics?
• 2. What Bible passage is the 10 commandments?
• 3. Name two attributes of God
• 4. How would a Christian follower of Divine Command approach
abortion?
• 5. What does it mean to say that God’s laws are objective?
• 6. What problems can you foresee with Divine Command theory?
17. Divine Command Theory – The
Euthyphro Dilemma
By the end of this lesson you will:
• Re-cap what you already know about
Divine Command Theory
• Understood the Euthyphro dilemma
• Evaluated how powerful you think the
Euthyphro dilemma is
18. Spec Check – Divine Command Theory
Ethical Theory Issues for Analysis
A. Divine Command Theory
Meta-Ethical theory – God as the origin and regulator
of morality; right or wrong as objective truths based
on God’s will or command. Moral goodness is
achieved by compiling with divine command; divine
command a requirement of God’s omnipotence;
divine command as an objective meta-physical
foundation for morality. Robert Adam’s ‘modified
divine command theory’
The Euthyphro dilemma, the arbitrariness problem,
pluralism objection
Is morality what God commands?
19. Starter - Speak it out
• Omnipotence
• God as regulator of morality
• Objective truths are based on God’s command
• God as omnipotent means that what he says must be correct
• Exodus 20
• ‘Thou shalt not kill’
• TASK: With your partner, take it in turns to speak out loud about a
bullet point at a time. Which partner can speak for the longest?
20. Write up
• God as the origin and regulator of morality;
• Right or wrong as objective truths based on God’s will or command.
• Moral goodness is achieved by compiling with divine command
• Divine command a requirement of God’s omnipotence.
• Divine command as an objective meta-physical foundation for
morality
• TASK: Using the phrases above, write a paragraph in your book which
explain these in detail.
21. The Euthyphro Dilemma
• Is an ancient Greek argument which challenges Divine Command Ethics. It
was posed by Socrates student ‘Euthyphro’ which we read about in Plato’s
book.
• Plato argued that there should be more to morality than just religious
obedience.
• This must be the case, because why do religious commands contradict each
other?
• You need to know the 2 positions of the theory
• Read the sheet on ‘the Euthyphro dilemma’ in your workbook
• Try to understand how these two positions undermine Divine Command.
• Make notes in your booklet.
22. Which problem matches which position?
• PROBLEM: God hasn’t had to make a choice about what
‘good’ things he should put in the Bible, everything in the Bible
is just ‘good’ anyway because God says so – yet being a good
and moral person usually involves making a choice. ‘is X good
solely because God commands it’
PROBLEM: Although this would mean that God has been a moral agent and
made a choice between good and evil – this means that things are
intrinsically good in themselves – which takes away from God’s overarching
goodness and makes us ask – what does make these things good?
‘Does God command X because it is already good’
23. Is the Bible passage....
Exodus 23:19
Genesis 22:1-19
Judges 11:30-39
Job 1:1-11
A) A POINTLESS COMMAND B) GOD COMMANDING
SOMETHING EVIL
Using the bible passages in front of you, decide whether the passage is either arbitrary or God commanding
something evil?
24. Bible Quotes
• 19 Bring the best of the first fruits of your soil into the house of the
LORD your God. You must not cook a young goat in its mother’s milk.
• 22 Some time later God tested Abraham. He said to him, “Abraham!” “Here
I am,” he replied. 2 Then God said, “Take your son, your only son, whom
you love—Isaac—and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a
burnt offering on a mountain I will show you.”
• 34 When Jephthah returned to his home in Mizpah, who should come out
to meet him but his daughter, dancing to the sound of timbrels! She was an
only child. Except for her he had neither son nor daughter. 35 When he saw
her, he tore his clothes and cried, “Oh no, my daughter! You have brought
me down and I am devastated. I have made a vow to the LORD that I cannot
break.”
• 11 But stretch out Your hand and strike all that he has, and he will
surely curse You to Your face.”
25. Questions
• 1. Explain the difference between ‘X is good because God wills it’ and
‘God wills X because it is good.’
• 2. Why does the Euthyphro dilemma pose a problem for God’s
omnipotence?
• 3. What Bible passages can you use to demonstrate the arbitrariness
of God’s will evident in Divine texts?
• 4. Can you think of any responses to the Euthyphro dilemma?
• TASK: Go through these questions with your partner and write the
answers in your book
27. Divine Command Theory – Robert
Adam’s modified approach
By the end of this lesson you will have:
• Re-capped what you know so far
• Learnt about Robert Adam’s
modified Divine Command theory
• Began to plan an essay response for
our key question part A
28. Spec Check – Divine Command Theory
Ethical Theory Issues for Analysis
A. Divine Command Theory
Meta-Ethical theory – God as the origin and regulator
of morality; right or wrong as objective truths based
on God’s will or command. Moral goodness is
achieved by compiling with divine command; divine
command a requirement of God’s omnipotence;
divine command as an objective meta-physical
foundation for morality. Robert Adam’s ‘modified
divine command theory’.
The Euthyphro dilemma, the arbitrariness problem,
pluralism objection
Is morality what God commands?
29. Moral argument Objective Subjective
Recap starter- pick at least 4 words from
the selection below & explain them!
Blue = 1 point each
Red = 2 points each
Black = 3 points each
Universal Moral Code Exodus 20 Isaac & Abraham
Divine command ethics Omnipotence Euthyphro dilemma
30. Task – Write up
• The Euthyphro dilemma
• Write a paragraph which would answer this part of the specification.
• Point: Tell me that the Euthyphro Dilemma is a criticism of divine command
• Explain: Explain in your own words the two positions of the Euthyphro
dilemma and why these pose a problem for the nature of God
• Example: Think of something which is seen as ‘good’ and then use this as
an example
• Link: State that this information shows you that the Euthyphro dilemma is
a problem for Divine Command.
31. Task – Pass the Sheets
• In your pairs please read each letter for 3mins and write what you
think it means on the sheet under the text.
• Remember to leave enough room for the next pair to write their
thoughts also on the sheet
• We will type up these notes as a class after the activity
32. • American philosopher Robert Adams proposes what he calls a
"modified divine command theory". Adams presents the basic form
of his theory by asserting that two statements are equivalent:
• 1. It is wrong to do X.
• 2. It is contrary to God's commands to do X.
•Adams believes that what God commands is
right and that God will never command
wrong
Robert Adam’s Modified Divine Command - A
33. • He proposes that God's commands precurse moral truths and they
must be explained in terms of moral truths, not the other way
around.
•Adams argues that God’s knowledge of right
and wrong comes before what is right and
wrong so therefore what he commands is
right
Robert Adam’s Modified Divine Command - B
34. • Adams writes that his theory is an attempt to define what being
ethically 'wrong' consists of and accepts that it is only useful to those
within a Judeo-Christian context.
•Adams accepts that divine command theory
is only useful for religious believers (Jewish
and Christian)
Robert Adam’s Modified Divine Command - C
35. • In dealing with the criticism that a seemingly immoral act would be
obligatory if God commanded it, he proposes that God does not
command cruelty for its own sake.
•God will only ever command cruelty if there
is a reason/purpose behind it
Robert Adam’s Modified Divine Command - D
36. • Adams does not propose that it would be logically impossible for God to
command cruelty, rather that it would be unthinkable for him to do so
because of his nature. Adams emphasises the importance of faith in God,
specifically faith in God's goodness, as well as his existence.
•Adams argues that God could command cruelty
because he is all powerful, but he won’t
command cruelty for cruelty’s sake because he
is all loving
Robert Adam’s Modified Divine Command - E
37. • Adams proposes that an action is morally wrong if and only if it defies the commands of
a loving God. If cruelty was commanded for cruelty’s own sake, he would not be loving;
Adams argued that, in this instance, God's commands would not have to be obeyed and
also that his theory of ethical wrongness would break down. He proposed that divine
command morality assumes that human concepts of right and wrong are met by God's
commands and that the theory can only be applied if this is the case.
• Humans will always follow what God commands because
it matches their own understanding of right and wrong. If
God did ever command something wrong, then humans
wouldn’t do it and the concept of God would collapse
(which it hasn’t)
Robert Adam’s Modified Divine Command - F
38. • Adams theory attempts to counter the challenge that morality might
be arbitrary, as moral commands are not based solely on the
commands of God, but are founded on his omnibenevolence. It
attempts to challenge the claim that an external standard of morality
prevents God from being sovereign by making him the source of
morality and his character the moral law.
•Basically, Adams argues that because God is
omnibenevolent he will never command
actual cruelty.
Robert Adam’s Modified Divine Command - G
39. Questions
• 1. Why must God’s command precurse a moral truth?
• 2. Which two religions is Adams writing his version of Divine Command
theory for?
• 3. What does Adams mean when he says that God wouldn’t command
cruelty for cruelty’s own sake?
• 4. Why does Adams claim that God would never command cruelty?
• 5. Why is faith so important for Adams Divine Command Theory?
• 6. If God did command something wrong for cruelty’s sake, would we still
have to commit the cruel act?
• 7. Why is God’s omnibenevolence as important as his omnipotence for
Adams’ theory?
40. Discussion Topic
• From what you have learnt so far, is morality what God commands?
• Think of 3 reasons why some people might think morality IS what God
commands
• Think of 3 reasons why some people might think morality ISN’T what
God commands
41. Divine Command Theory – Arbitrariness
and Pluralism objections
By the end of this lesson you will have:
• Discovered how arbitrariness and pluralism
are objections against Divine Command
Theory
• Considered whether or not you think
morality is what God commands
• Ensured that you understand Divine
Command Theory
42. Robert Adam’s Divine command Theory
• Write a paragraph on Adam’s Divine Command Theory. Include the
following phrases.
• Euthyphro Dilemma
• Omnipotent
• Cruelty
• Omnibenevolence
• Arbitrary
• Example (i.e. God bullying Job)
43. Spec Check – Divine Command Theory
Ethical Theory Issues for Analysis
A. Divine Command Theory
Meta-Ethical theory – God as the origin and regulator
of morality; right or wrong as objective truths based
on God’s will or command. Moral goodness is
achieved by compiling with divine command; divine
command a requirement of God’s omnipotence;
divine command as an objective meta-physical
foundation for morality. Robert Adam’s ‘modified
divine command theory’.
The Euthyphro dilemma, the arbitrariness problem,
pluralism objection
Is morality what God commands?
44. Arbitrary
• adjective
• 1.
• based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or
system.
• "an arbitrary decision"
45. The Arbitrariness Problem
• We have already touched upon the arbitrary problem as we have
already seen Bible passages in which God commands pointless tasks.
• This can be seen as a problem within itself, not just as part of the
Euthyphro Dilemma
• The arbitrariness problem is the problem that divine command theory
appears to render the content of morality arbitrary (arbitrary means
based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or
system). If divine command theory is true, it seems, then what is
good and what bad depends on nothing more than God’s whims.
Whims, though, even God’s whims, are not an adequate foundation
for morality.
46. The Pluralism Objection
• In a world of religious pluralism (many different religions) it is
impossible to know which god's or religion's commands should be
followed, especially because some religions contradict each other,
making it impossible to accept all of them
• EG
• Divorce is acceptable in Islam, but not in Christianity
• Islam expect that people should convert to Islam, but Christians
believe the only true way to an afterlife is through Jesus Christ
• Task: Why does this pose a problem for people who are basing their
moral codes on Divine Command?
47. • This is made even more complicated when we look at the different Divine
Commands WITHIN the different religions!
• For example the split between Sunni and Shi’a Muslims
• Sunni and Shia are two different denominations of Muslims
• All Muslims are required to pray five times a day. However, Shi'a practice
permits combining some prayers into three daily prayer times.
• They arrive at these through interpreting Divine Command differently
• TASK: What other examples can you think of where different
denominations of a religion have different ideas of Divine Command?
The Pluralism Objection
48. The Arbitrariness Problem
• Write a paragraph which states why God’s arbitrariness is a problem
for Divine Command. Relate it back to an example of goodness.
• In this paragraph you need to mention the following things:
• Whim
• Exodus 23 (Boiling a kid in mother’s milk)
• Problem for a basis of moral decision making
49. The Pluralism Objection
• Write a paragraph which states why religious pluralism is a problem
for Divine Command. Relate it back to an example of goodness.
• In this paragraph you need to mention the following things:
• Difference
• Contradiction
• Can’t be objective
• Clash
50. Divine Command Theory – Arbitrariness
and Pluralism objections
By the end of this lesson you will have:
• Discovered how arbitrariness and pluralism
are objections against Divine Command
Theory
• Considered whether or not you think
morality is what God commands
• Ensured that you understand Divine
Command Theory