This document contains a syllabus and review questions covering various topics related to the philosophy of religion. The topics include definitions of key terms like "God", arguments for and against God's existence, problems of evil and suffering, religious language and experiences. The review questions probe ideas around defining divinity, the diversity of views on God, atheism/agnosticism, philosophical arguments regarding God, theodicies, analyzing religious language, and assessing religious experiences.
Teaching argumentative writing can help develop students' critical thinking skills through inferences, arguments, facts and critical analysis. This powerpoint presentation provides: a definition for argumentative writing; examples of everyday arguments; elements of argumentative writing; ideas about how to organise an argumentative essay; practice prompts and much more!
Teaching argumentative writing can help develop students' critical thinking skills through inferences, arguments, facts and critical analysis. This powerpoint presentation provides: a definition for argumentative writing; examples of everyday arguments; elements of argumentative writing; ideas about how to organise an argumentative essay; practice prompts and much more!
Assignment 1 Discussion Individual FaithIn this course so fa.docxfredharris32
Assignment 1: Discussion: Individual Faith
In this course so far, you have spent time learning about various world religions and also the philosophy of religion. Now it is time for you to examine faith on an individual level.
In this assignment, you are going to look at the religious beliefs of one person and then categorize those beliefs. You may give a brief account of your own faith or you may interview someone and give an account of his or her faith.
Next, categorize those beliefs according to the following typology:
•Polytheist
•Monotheist
•Deist
•Pantheist
•Panentheist
•Atheist
•Agnostic
•Mystic
•Other
Describe the category you chose. Give examples of the beliefs of the person you wrote about and then explain why those beliefs belong in the category you selected.
Next, give a short answer to the following classic questions of philosophy, relative to the category you have chosen:
•What can this person believe about God and the universe?
•What must this person do to lead an ethical life?
•What may this person hope? What happens to this person when he or she dies?
Your initial response should be 2 to 3 paragraphs (250 words) in length. If you write about another person's beliefs, remember to keep that person anonymous.
After you post your initial response, please respond to a minimum of two of your peers' original posts. Remember, you are not to criticize the religious beliefs of your classmates.
By Saturday, September 13, 2014 write an account of you own religious beliefs, or those of a friend, and post that account to the Discussion Area. By Wednesday, September 17, 2014 respond to at least two original postings from your classmates.
Assignment 2: Unless I See, I Will Not Believe: The Relationship between Faith and Doubt
The words faith and doubt are easy to define, but they are much more difficult to live with. Faith is the belief in what is unseen or unsubstantiated in the physical sense as if it were in fact reality. Doubt is a particularly difficult concept for organized religions to handle—the doubts of a handful of believers, or even a single believer, can lead to a major change in a religion. Thus, as humans are we destined to doubt by human nature?
In an essay of 700 to 800 words, discuss the relationship between doubt and faith.
In your essay, address the following questions:
•What do the terms faith and doubt mean to religious philosophers?
•How do you define faith and doubt in the context of your life?
•What is the difference between saying, "I believe that," and "I believe in"?
•Is faith, in the religious sense, a matter of opinion or of trust?
•Are faith and doubt incompatible? Are they opposite or complementary?
•Discuss the religious tradition (of the five options) where faith is most prevalent. Where doubt is the most prevalent. Do these religions offer insight into your own faith/doubt equation?
Assignment 1: Discussion: Visions of God
Christianity and Islam are m ...
Ahmed Khoshaim01192017RELS 3345.ONLDr. Joseph DeLeon.docxnettletondevon
Ahmed Khoshaim
01/19/2017
RELS 3345.ONL
Dr. Joseph DeLeon
Why creating one universal definition of religion is so difficult? Comment by Dr. Joseph DeLeon: This is a statement, not a question. In American English, questions usually begin with a verb, in the case of your title, if you wanted to frame the title as a question, you should have written it as:
“Why is creating one universal definition of the notion of religion so difficult? Notice that I highlighted the verb “is” to show its location at the beginning of the sentence.
If you have issues with writing in English, I would highly recommend visiting the Writing Center. There you will find a wonderful group of individuals who are very good at helping students do well with their writing assignments so that they can earn the high grades that they may deserve.
Religion is the most difficult word to define it meaning primarily to various individuals from diverse communities. Every community views the word religion in a clear manner, making it believe the real meaning of the word. The term is usually utilized globally by various individuals asserting own meaning according to their belief. It is an argument that the religion power has to bind a person to a community, course of action in their daily life, culture ideology among other activities that the community undertakes believing that they are religious. Besides this argument, there are different individuals with their arguments that try to elaborate religion, making it difficult to understand the real meaning of the word. Religion is a word with no data or environment that tries to prove its purpose, making it is considered as the creation of many scholar’s study search as Rudolf Otto, James Martineau, Antony Wallace, and James Frazer among others. Comment by Dr. Joseph DeLeon: Your sentence should have been written so that it would read something like this:
Religion is a difficult term to define because it has a different meaning to different individuals around the world. Comment by Dr. Joseph DeLeon: Again, your sentence should have read:
Most communities interpret the term “religion” from their own particular point of view and sincerely believe that their perspective is the most valid.
It would also help if you had identified your source of information regarding this statement. Supporting your opinions and assertions is a requirement in this class. Comment by Dr. Joseph DeLeon: You’ve already asserted this – you are merely repeating yourself. Comment by Dr. Joseph DeLeon: This is not English and I would recommend that you have someone review your entire paper and help you re-write it. I will allow you to have a one-time opportunity to resubmit this MOD ONE assignment. However, all of your other assignments will be checked to make sure that your submissions the University’s college level quality standards and will be graded accordingly.
These individuals have used their life experiences and thoughts to explain the real me.
Site Visit Interview Site · - Religion · - Denominati.docxjennifer822
Site Visit Interview
Site:
· - Religion
· - Denomination: Interviewee: - Name: - Sex: - Age: - Occupation: For you to analyze at the house of worship
1. How is Eliade’s theory of sacred space and time is manifested in this house of worship?
a. What would you consider is the “Axis Mundi,”? Why?
b. What kinds of functions are the rituals/ceremonies achieving?
2. Scholars who apply a functional analysis to their study of religious rituals refer to their social values. Can you think of social values (including some unconscious ones) that some specific rituals may serve in this community?
3. Describe what you heard and saw impacted you.
For you to ask your interviewee:
1. What religion and denomination does your interview identify with?Christianity and denominational
2. What does religion mean to her/him? How important is religion in his or her life?It is very important is her life, it is like her having faith, god has a plan and purpose for her life.
a. For you to consider: Does s/he perceive religion from a more essential or functional perspective or both?
3. Describe how they understand the divine. What are the main characteristics of God/the sacred?
I beelive in the trinity: father => god and heaven
Son=> jesus who walked the eath
Holy spirit=> what lives inside of her
4. What is their favorite/ preferred sacred time (festival, ritual, ceremony) of the year? Why?
Christmas => cause jesus was born=> birth of the messih who came to die for our sense
Easter=> when jesus defeated death and goes to heaven
5. What is one sacred symbol that is particularly meaningful to them, and why? What does this sacred symbol represent to them? Why is it powerful and how does it transform them?
The cross, because that is what jesus died on.
6. Theodicy- how do they understand the problem of evil? Why does evil happen to good people?
She believes that there is enemy and god=> evil happen to good people because the enemy is trying to attack them and take away their joy and that is the hardest time because it’s when you need to believe the most, it’s not from god but from the enemy.
7. According to your interviewee, what is the biggest misunderstanding about their religion? Why is it problematic?
Faith is believe in what s unseen and people cannot understand in how that’s works
8. What do they think about the role of religion in our every-day secular life? Should religion be more involved or isolated from the public sphere?
Should be more involved. Not enough religion in today’s world
So much evil happening.
Homework
Answer the following questions:
What are the two major issues associated with linked data?
Describe data cleaning and data dredging
What is the difference between primary and secondary data collection?
What are the major limitations of collecting qualitative data? Why would you use open-ended questions on a survey?
Describe triangulation and give an example
Initial responses should be no less than 250 words in lengt.
GOD AS RATIONAL THOUGHTHOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS # 4.docxwhittemorelucilla
GOD AS RATIONAL THOUGHT
HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS # 4
Coursepack: Richard Swinburne, Some Major Strands of Theodicy: pages 30-46
Modular 10-11
1. Look up the meaning of the following: omnipotent, omniscient, Theodicy (Richard Swinburne’s meaning from the coursepack), efficaciously, supererogatory, conscripted, sub specie aeternitatis.
2. Explain Swinburne’s definition of natural evil as comprehensively as possible?
3. In the second paragraph found on page 36, Swinburne writes that “Sorrow shared is sorrow halved.” What does he mean by this in your own words? Also in the same paragraph beginning with: “God will not give us endless pain,” etc. The question is this: does a loving God give his children, name humanity, grief, pain, and failure, etc. Explain in your own words?
4. Write an overview in your own words about Swinburne’s theory of good intentions and good actions and their effects, on page 37 in the first paragraph?
5. In paragraph two on page 37 to the top of 38, what does Swinburne means by free choice and a minicreator? Explain?
6. Describe the free-will defense of theodicy, found on page 38, second paragraph?
7. Describe in your own words what Swinburne is saying in paragraph three and four found on page 41 to the top of 42, beginning with, as with desire, so with action, etc. and ending with, “life would have been worse for us.”
8. Describe in detail the two types of evil: nature evil and moral evil and the two types of good? You may find them on pages 43 in the middle paragraph and the top of 44.
9. Describe in your own words whether or not good can come from evil? Make sure your response is comprehensive. Check out Swinburne’s theory on the bottom of page 43 and the top of 45?
10. Outline Swinburne’s theory from the top of page 45 to the end of 46?
DOES GOD EXIST?
HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS
SWINBURNE, FAITH AND REASON, PAGES 33 – 54
Class 16
1. What does Swinburne mean by “Moral Goodness,” morally bad actions? Page 34 – 35.
2. Define the follow words: propositions, clairvoyance, olfactory, antecedent, quintessential, inductive, cosmology, omen, Rationality, telepathic, epistemological, culpable, teleological argument, supererogatory, epistemic.
3. Explain in detail the three ways of obligations to do positive actions? Pages 35 – 36.
4. Explain in detail the two kinds of moral truths? Page 36.
5. Explain in detail what Swinburne means by “Epistemic Justification?” Page 43.
6. Explain in detail the meaning of inductive criteria? Pages 44 – 45.
7. What is a deductive argument? Page 45. Provide examples. Outside sources are acceptable just cite the work.
8. Define the “Principle of Testimony,” found on page 49.
9. Outline the story of the detective found on page 47. What is the point the author is attempting to make?
10. Outline the ramifications of the failure to investigate the truth of a proposition found on the bottom of page 52. What is the point of the argument?
DOES GOD EXIST?
HOM ...
PHI 107 Module 1 NotesModule 1 Reading AssignmentWaller, B. N.docxrandymartin91030
PHI 107: Module 1 Notes
Module 1 Reading Assignment
Waller, B. N. (2011). Consider ethics: Theory, readings, and contemporary issues (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson. Chapters 1 and 3.
NOTE: Bookmarking pages in this site, especially the resources you access with the link above, is not recommended.
Please view Part 1 of the Online Presentation for Module 1.
Please view Part 2 of the Online Presentation for Module 1.
Thinking about Ethics, Emotions, and Intuitions
Chapter 1 Lecture Notes: Thinking about Ethics
Ethics and Critical Thinking
Ethics requires that we have a definite grasp on the questions to which we seek answers. Understanding ethical questions requires being able to identify which premises are relevant to the conclusion. Changing one's beliefs in light of better arguments or new information is a sign of clear and honest thinking. We must therefore be aware of bad reasoning or fallacies when discussing ethical questions. Bad forms of reasoning include the following: red herring/irrelevant reason, ad hominem, principle of charity, strawman fallacy, and inconsistency. The red herring/irrelevant reason fallacy is a fallacy in which an irrelevant issue is given as a reason for accepting a certain conclusion. For example, if I say “We should ban rated-R movies because murder is wrong,” I have presented an irrelevant reason for banning R-rated movies, as the question is not whether murder is wrong, but whether such movies lead to murder. The ad hominem fallacy is an attack on the arguer as opposed to an attack on the argument itself. If I claim that someone is wrong because they are a bad person, I have committed an ad hominem because I have attacked the character of the arguer, not the reasoning of the argument itself. Arguments stand on their own, regardless of who presents them, and must be evaluated thusly.
When engaging in ethical discussions and philosophical discussions in general, it is important to remember the principle of charity. The principle of charity states that you should approach an opponent’s argument as generously and honestly as you can. This means that you should not misrepresent an argument in order to make it more easily defeated. Doing this is called a strawman fallacy, where you defeat an argument by distorting it.
Ethical reasoning also requires that one’s beliefs are consistent with each other. If I accept a belief, I must accept all accompanying implications of the belief as well; otherwise my beliefs will suffer from inconsistency, thus rendering them arbitrary and unreasonable.
Studying Ethics
It is not the intention of this course to make you a better person, but to examine a number of conflicting moral positions and help you see where your views might fit. What kinds of truths are ethical truths? Are they eternal, absolute and universal, and known only by some special power; or are they more common ordinary facts that are part of our world that can be known by ordinary means? Philos.
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
Define personality from a psychological viewpoint. How is that different from a conversational comment that someone has a great personality?
Similar to Yr 12 revision questions section 1 and 2 (20)
1.
This
can
be
used
as
a
concept
checking
exercise.
Syllabus
topic:
A1-‐
What
does
the
word
‘God’
mean?
The
diversity
of
conceptions
of
the
divine.
Questions
for
review:
1. What
is
a
deductive
argument?
2. What
is
the
difference
between
an
argument
being
philosophically
sound
and
logical?
3. How
can
God
be
defined?
4. What
is
your
understanding
of
the
term
theism?
5. Religious
philosophers
throughout
the
ages
have
sought
to
define
the
being
known
as
God-‐
what
attributes
are
commonly
associated
with
the
classical
monotheistic
traditions?
List
and
define
at
least
6.
6. Consider
the
statement,
‘Many
have
argued
that
the
God’s
omnipotence
is
self-‐contradictory’.
Do
you
agree
or
disagree
with
this
statement?
Give
reasons
to
support
your
response.
7. Are
the
attributes
consistent
with
one
another?
Syllabus
topic:
A2-‐
Atheism,
agnosticism,
humanism,
Nihilism
Questions
for
review:
1. Define
the
terms
atheism,
agnosticism
and
humanism.
2. Where
does
each
sit
on
the
spectrum
of
Non-‐Religious
belief?
3. Which
of
the
positions
do
you
consider
the
most
formed?
(philosophically
strong)
2. 4. How
does
Nihilism
differ
from
the
terms
discussed
above?
Outline
the
Nihilistic
argument
and
its
position
on
meaning.
Syllabus
topic:
A3-‐
Arguments
for
and
against
the
existence
of
God
Questions
for
review:
1. Outline
the
Cosmological
Argument
and
the
counter
criticisms
to
it.
2. Outline
the
Ontological
Argument
for
the
existence
of
God
and
consider
the
view
that,
while
it
may
strengthen
a
believer’s
faith,
it
has
no
value
for
the
non-‐believer.
3.
Examine
and
assess
the
view
that
the
Ontological
Argument
for
the
existence
of
God
is
convincing.
4. Outline
the
Ontological,
Cosmological
and
Teleological
Arguments
for
the
existence
of
God.
Choose
one
of
these
arguments
and
examine
criticisms
that
have
been
made
of
its
form,
content
and
conclusions.
5. ‘The
moral
argument
does
not
prove
that
God
exists,
but
it
does
make
it
probable
that
God
exists’
Discuss
this
assertion.
Syllabus
topic:
A4-‐
Problems
of
Evil
and
Suffering
Questions
for
review:
1. What
is
a
theodicy?
2. Define
the
terms
natural
and
moral
evil.
Which
do
you
consider
the
‘easier’
to
explain?
3. Outline
the
two
classical
theodicies.
4. ‘If
God
were
the
omnipotent,
wholly
good,
creator
of
all
things,
then
evil
would
not
exist.
Evil
exists.
Therefore,
God
is
not
the
omnipotent,
wholly
good,
creator
of
all
things’.
Examine
this
argument.
5. ‘The
problem
of
evil
can
never
be
satisfactorily
resolved’.
Discuss.
3.
Syllabus
topic:
A5-‐
Religious
language,
ritual
and
symbol
Questions
for
review:
1. Define
the
following
terms:
Realism,
anti-‐realism,
equivocal,
univocal,
empiricism,
analytic
and
synthetic.
2. Outline
the
verification
principle-‐
how
does
this
relate
to
the
topic
of
religious
language?
3. Outline
the
falsification
principle-‐
how
does
this
relate
to
the
topic
of
religious
language?
4. What
purpose
does
analogy
play
in
religious
texts?
5. ‘All
talk
about
God
is
both
without
meaning
and
purpose’
Discuss.
6. a)
What
is
meant
by
‘language
games’?
b)
Why
have
some
scholars
claimed
that
religious
language
is
a
language
game?
7.
In
what
ways
has
the
meaningfulness
of
religious
language
been
challenged
by
the
twentieth-‐century
empiricism?
8. ‘Once
we
acknowledge
the
symbolic
character
of
religious
language;
can
we
be
sure
we
are
talking
about
anything
at
all’?
Discuss.
Religious
Experience
and
Behaviour
B1-‐
The
nature
and
value
of
religious
experiences:
from
social
conformity
to
personal
commitment
Reading-‐
Pages
46-‐60
of
Questions
for
review:
1. Should
we
trust
our
own
religious
experiences
and
the
experiences
of
others?
2. What
are
the
features
of
a
religious
experience?
4. text.
3. Outline
the
different
types
of
religious
experiences.
4. How
might
religious
experience
influence
ideas
about
the
meaning
of
the
word
‘God’?
5. Describe
what
is
meant
by
‘numinous’?
To
what
extent
does
this
match
the
traditional
theistic
ideas
of
God?
6. Discuss
the
view
that
mystical
experience
cannot
give
factual
knowledge
about
God.
7. Outline
the
main
criticisms
to
the
argument
from
religious
experience.
How
valid
are
these
criticisms?
B2-‐
The
pragmatic
view
of
faith:
indoctrination,
illusion,
projection
Reading-‐
Pages
65-‐72
of
the
text.
Questions
for
review:
1. What
is
faith?
2. To
what
extent
is
evidence
needed
for
one
to
have
faith?
3.
Why
does
religion
exist?
4. Do
you
believe
that
psychology
and
sociology
have
given
a
sufficient
explanation
of
religion,
thereby
rendering
God
redundant?
5. From
a
psychological/sociological
position
is
religion
harmful?
6. Should
religion
regard
Jung
as
a
friend
or
foe?
7. Is
Jung’s
view
compatible
with
traditional
Christian
beliefs?
8. Does
religion
give
society
its
moral
sense,
or
does
society’s
moral
sense
create
5. religion?
(Durkheim
says
the
latter)
9. What
did
Marx
mean
by
describing
religion
as
the
opium
of
the
masses?
10. Do
you
consider
this
to
be
a
positive
or
negative
view
of
religion’s
role
in
life?
11. Explain
what
Freud
meant
by
a
‘universal
obsessional
neurosis’?
To
what
extent
is
this
an
adequate
view
of
religion?
B3-‐
Faith
and
motivation
for
belief
and
the
postmodern
view
of
faith
Reading-‐
Pages
65-‐72
of
the
text.
Questions
for
review:
1. What
is
the
relationship
of
reason
and
evidence
to
religious
faith
and
belief?
2. Can
we
prove
the
existence
of
a
higher
being
through
reasoning
or
experience?
3. What
motivates
people
to
believe
in
God?
4. What
does
the
word
fideism
mean?
5. Describe
Pascal’s
wager.
6. What
does
Plantinga
mean
by
the
statement
‘religious
beliefs
are
properly
basic?’
7. Why
does
Plantinga
reject
classical
foundationalism?
8. Kierkegaard
states
that
‘religion
is
a
form
of
life’-‐
what
does
he
mean
by
this?
9. Describe
what
is
meant
by
the
term
postmodernism?
10. What
is
the
postmodern
view
of
faith?
6. B4-‐
The
human
experience
of
evil:
moral
evil,
natural
evil
Reading-‐
Pages
61-‐64
of
the
text.
Questions
for
review:
1. How
can
evil
be
explained?
2. What
is
the
distinction
between
moral
and
natural
evil?
3. Is
one
evil
easier
to
comprehend
than
the
other?
4. Has
the
notion
of
evil
changed
in
the
post-‐holocaust
world?
5. What
is
the
difference
between
Augustine
and
Irenaeus?
B5-‐
Sin,
alienation
and
salvation
Questions
for
review:
1. What
is
the
human
condition
in
relation
to
sin?
2. Is
there
a
need
for
human
beings
to
be
saved?
3. What
are
the
different
religious
traditions
teachings
on
sin
and
salvation?