Diversity Project Kickoff Your Name Capella University BUS3012_U05A1 Slide Title Slide Title Slide Title Slide Title Slide Title Slide Title Slide Title image1.jpeg I want you to identify the paper that was the best one of the semester, and the paper that was the worst one of all these papers below. You should name each of them, and provide just a couple of sentences describing why you choose them. Then use the scholarly search tools we listed early in the semester to find current papers (2020 onward) on the same two general topics. For example, if one of your choices is the paper that focused on Multics virtual memory, you probably wouldn't find much that is current and specifically references Multics, but you could certainly find papers on some aspect of virtual memory. So again, find a current paper on each of those two topics. Then write the usual summary and reaction for each of them with the headings. (Note: don't forget which papers you chose for best and worst.) Paper 1: Read this paper: Peter Chen, Edward Lee, Garth Gibson, Randy Katz, and David Patterson, "RAID: High-Performance, Reliable Secondary Storage", ACM Computing Surveys, volume 26, number 2, June 1994.  Paper 2: Mendel Rosenblum and John Ousterhout, "The Design and Implementation of a Log Structured File System", Proceedings of the Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 1991. Paper 3: John Howard, Michael Kazarm Sherri Menees, David Nichols, M. Satyanarayanan, Robert Sidebotham, and Michael West, "Scale and Performance in a Distributed File System", ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, Volume 6, Number 1, February 1988.  Paper 4: The paper is A. Bensoussan and R. Daley, "The Multics Virtual Memory: Concepts and Design", Proceedings of the Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 1969." Paper 5: Peter Denning, "The Working Set Model for Program Behavior", Communications of the ACM, 1968. Paper 6: Richard Carr and John Hennessy, "WSClock -- A Simple and Effective Algorithm for Virtual Memory Management", Proceedings of the Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 1981. Paper 7: Judy Kay and Piers Lauder, A fair share scheduler, Communications of the ACM 31.1, 1988 Paper 8: Carl Waldspurger and Weihl William, Lottery scheduling: Flexible proportional-share resource management,  In Proceedings of the 1st USENIX conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation,  1994 Paper 9: Dabek, Frank, et al. "Event-driven programming for robust software." Proceedings of the 10th workshop on ACM SIGOPS European workshop. 2002. Paper 10: Rob von Behren, Jeremy Condit, and Eric Brewer, Why Events Are A Bad Idea (for high-concurrency servers), Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems, 2003. Scenario Imagine that Lynette follows up with you in an e-mail shortly after reading your views on leadership and collaboration.E-mail from.

1. Diversity Project Kickoff
Your Name
Capella University
BUS3012_U05A1
Slide Title
Slide Title
Slide Title

2. Slide Title
Slide Title
Slide Title
Slide Title
image1.jpeg
I want you to identify the paper that was the best one of the

3. semester, and the paper that was the worst one of all these
papers below. You should name each of them, and provide just a
couple of sentences describing why you choose them. Then use
the scholarly search tools we listed early in the semester to find
current papers (2020 onward) on the same two general topics.
For example, if one of your choices is the paper that focused on
Multics virtual memory, you probably wouldn't find much that
is current and specifically references Multics, but you could
certainly find papers on some aspect of virtual memory. So
again, find a current paper on each of those two topics. Then
write the usual summary and reaction for each of them with the
headings. (Note: don't forget which papers you chose for best
and worst.)
Paper 1: Read this paper: Peter Chen, Edward Lee, Garth
Gibson, Randy Katz, and David Patterson, "RAID: High-
Performance, Reliable Secondary Storage", ACM Computing
Surveys, volume 26, number 2, June 1994.
Paper 2: Mendel Rosenblum and John Ousterhout, "The Design
and Implementation of a Log Structured File System",
Proceedings of the Symposium on Operating Systems
Principles, 1991.
Paper 3: John Howard, Michael Kazarm Sherri Menees, David
Nichols, M. Satyanarayanan, Robert Sidebotham, and Michael
West, "Scale and Performance in a Distributed File System",
ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, Volume 6, Number 1,
February 1988.
Paper 4: The paper is A. Bensoussan and R. Daley, "The
Multics Virtual Memory: Concepts and Design", Proceedings of
the Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 1969."
Paper 5: Peter Denning, "The Working Set Model for Program
Behavior", Communications of the ACM, 1968.

4. Paper 6: Richard Carr and John Hennessy, "WSClock -- A
Simple and Effective Algorithm for Virtual Memory
Management", Proceedings of the Symposium on Operating
Systems Principles, 1981.
Paper 7: Judy Kay and Piers Lauder, A fair share scheduler,
Communications of the ACM 31.1, 1988
Paper 8: Carl Waldspurger and Weihl William, Lottery
scheduling: Flexible proportional-share resource management,
In Proceedings of the 1st USENIX conference on Operating
Systems Design and Implementation, 1994
Paper 9: Dabek, Frank, et al. "Event-driven programming for
robust software." Proceedings of the 10th workshop on ACM
SIGOPS European workshop. 2002.
Paper 10: Rob von Behren, Jeremy Condit, and Eric Brewer,
Why Events Are A Bad Idea (for high-concurrency servers),
Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems, 2003.
Scenario
Imagine that Lynette follows up with you in an e-mail shortly
after reading your views on leadership and collaboration.E-mail
from Lynette
Hi,
Thanks for sending me your thoughts on the diversity issue at
the Lakeland Clinic. The next step is for you to select a team of
professionals who can help you in this project and prepare an
introduction of the project for a first meeting with them.
I want you to prepare a presentation to serve as a brief but
substantive introduction for the first meeting with a group of

5. four members who will participate on the committee tasked with
addressing the diversity issue.
The presentation should be approximately 5 minutes (use as
many slides as required), so I can understand your approach.
There isn't a lot of time or space, so keep things pretty high
level.
Slides I would expect to see would include headings such as the
ones below. However, you certainly have creative freedom to
create ones that best align with your presentation. Simply be
sure that the key topics are covered.
· Welcome.
· Who Am I (this is a bio of yourself).
· Project Background.
· Project Goals.
· Project Team Members/Composition.
· Team Communication & Scheduled Meetings.
· Team Collaboration.
· Expected Outcomes.
· Q&A.
Be certain to explain the project background, goals, and the
composition of your team. (Note that you will not know the
exact personnel yet, but titles will do. Recruit team members
with the desired qualities and characteristics that you outline in
the presentation.) You will want the group to be diverse, with
each member being able to provide a unique perspective.
Explain how the committee will work together and achieve
effective interprofessional collaboration. Conclude by sharing
your expected outcomes of the project.
Thanks,
Lynette
Use the PowerPoint Template [PPTX] to create 5-minute
presentation with visuals in response to the above scenario. In
place of a narrated presentation, you need to include detailed
speaker notes underneath every slide in your PowerPoint
presentation.

6. · Be sure not to make the error of simply writing out what you
have placed on each slide. You will be required to include in the
speaker notes what you would have been saying aloud if you
were recording a video. Stated another way, your notes are
replacing a five-minute presentation.
· PowerPoint slides with speaker notes. Include detailed speaker
notes for every slide. Use a minimum of seven (7) content
slides. The welcome, conclusion, questions, and reference slides
are not considered content slides
· Visuals: Create visuals that are easily read and interpreted.
Use colors, fonts, formatting, and other design principles that
make the information clear and generally add to the aesthetic of
the presentation.
You can elect not to record a voice-over video. However, in its
place, you need to include “detailed speaker notes” underneath
every slide in your PowerPoint presentation. Under each slide,
you will see the words “Click to add notes”. This is where you
will add your speakers notes.
If you elect Option B, be sure not to make the error of simply
writing out what you have placed on each slide. You will be
required to include what you would have been saying aloud if
you were recording a voice-over. Stated another way, your notes
would be replacing a five-minute presentation.
You will not receive a deduction in points towards your grade if
your speaker’s notes are sufficiently developed with strong
insight / depth and explain what I see on your slides.
VER IMPORTANT: If you submit PowerPoint slides without a
voice-over or detailed speakers notes, you will see a 25%
deduction in your score as outlined in the Faculty Expectations.
I will post a PowerPoint sample with both a voice recording,
and detailed speakers notes tomorrow. Be sure to notice that
everything I am saying is “not” placed on the slides.
· Competency 1: Analyze leadership traits and styles.
· Justify one's own criteria and choice for committee members.

7. · Competency 2: Apply accepted leadership practices and
behaviors.
· State goals and initial priorities that reasonably reflect the
project.
· Describe a plan to facilitate effective interprofessional
collaboration and motivation among a committee.
· Competency 3: Communicate professionally and effectively.
· Create an organized multimedia presentation that clearly
communicates specified content.
· Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth
transitions.