The document details a project analyzing cantilever beams of various cross-sectional shapes (I, C, T) and materials (steel, stainless steel, cast iron) using static and modal analysis in ANSYS. It includes steps for solid modeling, material property assignment, and results comparison, concluding that cast iron performs better in terms of stress and natural frequency for the cantilever beam structure. The analysis reveals that I-section beams exhibit lower deformation and stress values compared to other sections.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE
Abeam is a structural element that is capable of
withstanding load primarily by resisting against bending
A beam can be made of wood, concrete, steel depending
upon need
The bending force induced into the material of the beam
as a result of the external loads, own weight, span and
external reactions to these loads
Internally, beams experience compressive,
tensile and shear stresses as a result of the loads
applied to them
To retain beam within safe operating environment, it must
be designed with high rigidity and damping capacity
Cantilever beam has one end fixed and one end loaded
2.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE
Wecompared the cantilever beam stress and natural
frequency for different material having same I, C and T
cross- sectional beam
Cantilever beam having steel, stainless steel, &cast iron
undergoes static and modal analysis
The cantilever beam is designed and analyzed in
ANSYS
3.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE
Solidmodeling of I,C,&T beam cross-section with help
of Creo(formerly Pro–Engineer) CAD software
Save the file in igs format
Import solid model into ANSYS
Assigning material properties
Do analysis for static structural model for I,C,&T cross
section for cantilever beam for steel,stainless steel
&cast iron.
Do modal analysis for I,C,&T cross section for
cantilever beam for steel,stainless steel &cast iron.
4.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE
Identifyingminimum stress, strain & deformation
reducing material for structural analysis
Identifying minimum stress, strain & deformation
reducing material for modal analysis
Conclusion based on results comparison
Project document preparation
STEPS FOR STRUCTURALANALYSIS OF
CANTILEVER BEAM FOR STATIC
ANALYSIS
Save Creo Model as .iges format
Go to ansys
Click on Workbench
Select analysis system
Select static structural
Select Geometry
Right click & select import geometry
Browse & open part
Select mesh on workbench select it & edit
Go to geometry & edit material
8.
STATIC ANALYSIS
PROPERTIES
Itis a type of structural analysis
Calculates the effect of steady loading
conditions on structure
Includes steady inertia load
Includes time varying load that
approximated as static equivalent load
Ignore inertia and damping effect
9.
STATIC ANALYSIS OFCANTILEVER
BEAM
CONDITION – I SECTION
MATERIAL-STEEL Step-1
Import Steel geometry having I-section in
ansys
10.
Step-2:-
Go togeometry
Select geometries
Edit material
MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF STEEL:-
Density : 7850kg/m3
Young’s modulus : 205000Mpa
Poisson’s ratio : 0.3
STATIC ANALYSIS OFCANTILEVER
BEAM
CONDITION – I SECTION
MATERIAL-STAINLESS STEEL
• Follow the previous 4 steps for importing
geometry & meshing
• Go to solution & Insert total deformation
17.
In Step-2:-
Goto geometry
Select geometries
Edit material
MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF STAINLESS
STEEL:-
Density : 7750kg/m3
Young’s modulus : 193000Mpa
Poisson’s ratio : 0.3
18.
STAINLESS STEEL VONMISES
STRESS
Go to solution
Insert equivalent von-mises stress
19.
STAINLESS STEEL VONMISES
STRAIN
Go to solution
Insert equivalent von-mises strain
20.
STATIC ANALYSIS OFCANTILEVER
BEAM
CONDITION – I SECTION
MATERIAL-CAST IRON
Follow the previous 4 steps for
importing geometry & meshing
Go to solution & Insert total
21.
In Step-2:-
Goto geometry
Select geometries
Edit material
MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF CAST
IRON:-
Density : 7200kg/m3
Young’s modulus : 110000Mpa
Poisson’s ratio : 0.24
22.
CAST IRON VONMISES
STRESS
Go to solution
Insert equivalent von-mises stress
23.
CAST IRON VONMISES
STRAIN
Go to solution
Insert equivalent von-mises strain
24.
STATIC ANALYSIS OFCANTILEVER
BEAM
CONDITION – C SECTION & T SECTION
• Follow the same steps for C section & T
section of beam
• Change the properties by changing the
Materials
• Use steel, stainless steel, cast iron
materials for the sections
• Do solution for deformation, von mises
stress & von mises strain
STEPS FOR STRUCTURALANALYSIS OF
CANTILEVER BEAM FOR MODAL
ANALYSIS Save Creo Model as .iges format
Go to ansys
Click on Workbench
Select analysis system
Select modal
Select Geometry
Right click & select import geometry
Browse & open part
Select modal do right click & edit
Another window will be open
35.
MODAL ANALYSIS
PROPERTIES
Typeof Structural analysis
Use for determining structure dynamic
characteristics
Determine the natural frequencies and
mode shapes of a structure
Consider frequencies at which
vibration occurs
Consider the modal shapes of
vibrating system
36.
STATIC ANALYSIS OFCANTILEVER BEAM
CONDITION – I SECTION
MATERIAL-STEEL
• Step-1
Import Steel geometry having I-section in
ansys
37.
Step-2:-
Go togeometry
Select geometries
Edit material
MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF STEEL:-
Density : 7850kg/m3
Young’s modulus : 205000Mpa
Poisson’s ratio : 0.3
RESULT TABLE
• Staticanalysis results
Material Deformation(mm) Stress(N/mm²) Strain
Steel 2.4219 77.836 0.00038918
Stainless steel 2.5099 78.313 0.00040577
Cast iron 4.4028 76.871 0.00069833
C-section
Material Deformation(mm) Stress(N/mm²) Strain
Steel 10.361 169.52 0.00084759
Stainless steel 10.778 170.35 0.00088267
Cast iron 18.696 167.77 0.0015251
I-section
T-section
Material Deformation(mm) Stress(N/mm²) Strain
Steel 4.7314 207.08 0.0010354
Stainless steel 4.9027 208.22 0.0010789
Cast iron 8.6034 204.75 0.0018614
49.
RESULT TABLE
Modalanalysis results
I-section
Material Total Deformation-1 Total Deformation-2 Total Deformation-3
Steel 9.2158 11.7 9.06
Stainless
steel
9.2752 11.8 9.12
Cast iron 9.6225 12.23 9.466
C-section
Material Total Deformation-1 Total Deformation-2 Total Deformation-3
Steel 9.9427 14.092 11.479
Stainless
steel
10.012 14.192 11.553
Cast iron 10.37 14.691 11.987T-section
Material Total Deformation-1 Total Deformation-2 Total Deformation-3
Steel 13.151 13.465 10.829
Stainless
steel
13.053 13.37 10.76
Cast iron 13.599 13.941 11.236
50.
CONCLUSION
In thiswork we compared the stress and natural
frequency for different material having same I, C and T
cross- sectional beam.
The cantilever beam is designed and analyzed in
ANSYS. The cantilever beam which is fixed at one end
is vibrated to obtain the natural frequency, mode shapes
and deflection with different sections and materials.
By observing the static analysis the deformation and
stress values are less for I-section cantilever beam at
cast iron material than steel and stainless steel.
By observing the modal analysis results the deformation
and frequency values are less for I-section cantilever
beam more for T-section.
So it can be conclude the cast iron material is better
material for cantilever beam in this type I-section model.