Peter Clemmensen, Henning Kelbæk, Anne Kaltoft, Steffen Helqvist, Jens Flensted Lassen, Lene Kløvgaard, Christian J Terkelsen, Hans Henrik Tilsted, Thomas Engstrøm, Lars R Krusell, Evald H. Christiansen, Kari Saunamäki, Erik Jørgensen, Hans E. Bøtker, Jan Ravkilde, Klaus F Kofoed, Lars Køber, Leif Thuesen Long-term outcome after drug-eluting versus  bare-metal stent implantation in patients with  ST-elevation myocardial infarction  3 year follow-up of the randomised DEDICATION trial  Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet Aarhus University Hospital Skejby Denmark
The study has received unrestricted grants from the Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific companies The presenter has previously or currently been involved in research contracts, consulting or received research and educational grants from: Abbott, AstraZeneca, Aventis, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, Merck, Myogen, Medtronic, Mitsubishi Pharma, Nycomed, Organon, Pfizer, Pharmacia, Sanofi-Synthelabo, Searle, The Medicines Company. Disclosures
Implantation of drug eluting stents (DES) has proven to be both safe and efficient in most patients with coronary artery disease. However, long-term data are scarce with regard to their use in STEMI patients treated with PCI Background
Drug-Eluting vs Bare-Metal Stent Implantation during Primary PCI Previous published studies with ≥ 150 patients   Study STRATEGY TYPHOON PASSION SESAMI n 175 712 619 320 FU 133 170 - 166 DES/BMS 18/32 7/14 9/13 7/17 DES/BMS 8/28 7/20 - 9/21 endpoint MACCE TVF MACE RS p 0.001 0.004 0.09 0.03 Invasive Primary RS,% MACE,%
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results 3 years after implantation of DES vs BMS in  STEMI patients treated with primary PCI Purpose
STEMI n=626 Randomization + Distal Protection - Distal Protection Bare Metal Stent  MACE Angiography - QCA / MACE 1 month 15 months Bare Metal Stent Drug Eluting Stent Drug Eluting Stent Flow chart Post Procedure Angiography - QCA  MACE MACE 8 months 3 years
STEMI n=626 Randomization + Distal Protection - Distal Protection Bare Metal Stent  MACE Angiography - QCA / MACE 1 month 15 months Bare Metal Stent Drug Eluting Stent Drug Eluting Stent Flow chart Post Procedure Angiography - QCA  MACE MACE 8 months 3 years
MACE (cardiac death, re-infarction, TLR) at 3 years Cardiac death at 3 years Total mortality MI TLR TVR Stroke Endpoints
Major inclusion criteria Patients who presented with the symptoms and  signs of a first time large STEMI Chest pain ≤ 12 hours duration ST-elevation > 4 mm in contiguous leads High grade stenosis/occlusion of a native coronary artery that could be crossed with a guidewire
Major exclusion criteria History of a previous myocardial infarction Left main stem stenosis Gastrointestinal bleeding within 1 month Expected survival < 1 year Linguistic difficulties needing an interpretor
Screened patients 1687 Included patients 626 Excluded patients 1061 216 Clinically or psychologically  instability / unconsciousness 162 ST-elevation < 4 mm 141 Participation in another study 140 Vessel unsuitable for filterwire 78 Onset symptoms >12 hours 72 Linguistic problems  68 Screening log not filled in  58 Previous infarction 43 Severe other disease 35 Refused to participate  26 Significant left main stenosis -  22 Other 24 deaths 83 lost to re-angiography Study Flow 543 patients for re-angiography 602 patients for 8-month FU 573 patients for 3-year FU 29 deaths
STEMI - PPCI  n: 626 Randomization Drug Eluting Stent n: 313 Bare Metal Stent n: 313 Number of Patients
Baseline clinical  characteristics DES n=313 BMS n=313 p 0.41 0.93 0.30 0.67 0.54 0.88 0.87 0.45 0.20 0.56 0.69 0.63 63 73.5 11.5 34.0 21.4 54.7 38.2 0.47 7.1 5.4 200 25 62 72.8 9.3 32.3 18.7 52.7 37.3 0.48 6.1 4.5 197 25 Age (years) Male gender (%) Diabetes Mellitus (%) Hypertension (%) Hyperlipidemia (%) Current smoker (%) Family history of CAD (%) Left ventricular ejection fraction   Previous myocardial infarction (%) Previous PCI / CABG (%) Symptom onset to arrival, min Door-to-balloon, min
Baseline lesion  characteristics 0.27 DES n=313 BMS n=313 p 0.57 0.47 38 14 48 61 29 10 70 30 44 11 45 65 25 10 65 35 Infarct related coronary artery (%) LAD CX RCA Number of diseased vessel (%) 1 vessel disease 2 vessel disease 3 vessel disease Baseline TIMI flow  TIMI 0-1 TIMI 2-3
Procedural results DES n=313 BMS n=313 p 0.21 0.33 0.38 0.29 0.52 0.13 0.86 0.20 1.00 0.73 95 72 42 98 1.3 21.0 3.53 16.3 90 99 97 74 40 99 1.3 22.2 3.54 16.7 90 98 Use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, % Visible thrombus,% Filterwire used, % Stent implanted, % Number of stents per lesion Stented length, mm Stent diameter, mm Max deployment pressure, mm Hg TIMI III post procedure  Procedural success, %
P=0.084 P=0.013 P=0.58 P=0.45 P<0.001 P<0.001 P=0.64 P=0.024 MACE during 3 years
0  200  400  600  800  1000  1200 P=0.028 DES BMS 100 80 60 40 Freedom from MACE Freedom from MACE Days
0  200  400  600  800  1000  1200 P=0.059 DES BMS 100 80 60 40 Freedom from all-cause mortality (%)   Freedom from all-cause mortality Days
0  200  400  600  800  1000  1200 P=0.008 DES BMS 100 80 60 40 Freedom from cardiac mortality (%)  Freedom from cardiac mortality Days
10 8 6 4 2 0 P=0.511 DES BMS Cumulative incidence (%) 0  200  400  600  800  1000  1200 Any stent thrombosis Days
10 8 6 4 2 0 P=0.296 DES BMS Cumulative incidence (%) 0  200  400  600  800  1000  1200 Definite stent thrombosis Days
0 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 no DM 561 11.3 17.7 DM   65 13.8 22.2 Female 168 10.6 24.1 Male 458 11.8 16.1 Age    63 311 13.7  17.1 Age < 63 315   9.4 19.4 All 626 11.5  18.2 Group n DES BMS DES better BMS better Odds Ratio (95% CI) Rate of  MACE (%) Subgroup analysis CX / RCA 368   9.4 16.4 LAD 258 14.8 20.6 Stent length    18 mm 310   9.5 17.9 Stent length > 18 mm 309 12.9 17.8 No visible thrombus 168 11.1 24.1 Visible thrombus 458 11.6 15.9 Ref D    3.1 mm 299 12.0 20.8 Ref D > 3.1 mm 317   9.6 15.6
0 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 no DM 561 11.3 17.7 DM   65 13.8 22.2 Female 168 10.6 24.1 Male 458 11.8 16.1 Age    63 311 13.7  17.1 Age < 63 315   9.4 19.4 All 626 11.5  18.2 Group n DES BMS DES better BMS better Odds Ratio (95% CI) Rate of  MACE (%) Subgroup analysis CX / RCA 368   9.4 16.4 LAD 258 14.8 20.6 Stent length    18 mm 310   9.5 17.9 Stent length > 18 mm 309 12.9 17.8 No visible thrombus 168 11.1 24.1 Visible thrombus 458 11.6 15.9 Ref D    3.1 mm 299 12.0 20.8 Ref D > 3.1 mm 317   9.6 15.6
0 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 no DM 561 11.3 17.7 DM   65 13.8 22.2 Female 168 10.6 24.1 Male 458 11.8 16.1 Age    63 311 13.7  17.1 Age < 63 315   9.4 19.4 All 626 11.5  18.2 Group n DES BMS DES better BMS better Odds Ratio (95% CI) Rate of  MACE (%) Subgroup analysis CX / RCA 368   9.4 16.4 LAD 258 14.8 20.6 Stent length    18 mm 310   9.5 17.9 Stent length > 18 mm 309 12.9 17.8 No visible thrombus 168 11.1 24.1 Visible thrombus 458 11.6 15.9 Ref D    3.1 mm 299 12.0 20.8 Ref D > 3.1 mm 317   9.6 15.6
0 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 no DM 561 11.3 17.7 DM   65 13.8 22.2 Female 168 10.6 24.1 Male 458 11.8 16.1 Age    63 311 13.7  17.1 Age < 63 315   9.4 19.4 All 626 11.5  18.2 Group n DES BMS DES better BMS better Odds Ratio (95% CI) Rate of  MACE (%) Subgroup analysis CX / RCA 368   9.4 16.4 LAD 258 14.8 20.6 Stent length    18 mm 310   9.5 17.9 Stent length > 18 mm 309 12.9 17.8 No visible thrombus 168 11.1 24.1 Visible thrombus 458 11.6 15.9 Ref D    3.1 mm 299 12.0 20.8 Ref D > 3.1 mm 317   9.6 15.6
reduced the rate of MACE and the need for repeat revascularization Conclusions In the DEDICATION trial implantation of DES  (compared with BMS) in STEMI patients was not associated with an increased rate of myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis  was associated with an increased risk of cardiac death

Dedication-Clemmensen

  • 1.
    Peter Clemmensen, HenningKelbæk, Anne Kaltoft, Steffen Helqvist, Jens Flensted Lassen, Lene Kløvgaard, Christian J Terkelsen, Hans Henrik Tilsted, Thomas Engstrøm, Lars R Krusell, Evald H. Christiansen, Kari Saunamäki, Erik Jørgensen, Hans E. Bøtker, Jan Ravkilde, Klaus F Kofoed, Lars Køber, Leif Thuesen Long-term outcome after drug-eluting versus bare-metal stent implantation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction 3 year follow-up of the randomised DEDICATION trial Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet Aarhus University Hospital Skejby Denmark
  • 2.
    The study hasreceived unrestricted grants from the Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific companies The presenter has previously or currently been involved in research contracts, consulting or received research and educational grants from: Abbott, AstraZeneca, Aventis, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, Merck, Myogen, Medtronic, Mitsubishi Pharma, Nycomed, Organon, Pfizer, Pharmacia, Sanofi-Synthelabo, Searle, The Medicines Company. Disclosures
  • 3.
    Implantation of drugeluting stents (DES) has proven to be both safe and efficient in most patients with coronary artery disease. However, long-term data are scarce with regard to their use in STEMI patients treated with PCI Background
  • 4.
    Drug-Eluting vs Bare-MetalStent Implantation during Primary PCI Previous published studies with ≥ 150 patients Study STRATEGY TYPHOON PASSION SESAMI n 175 712 619 320 FU 133 170 - 166 DES/BMS 18/32 7/14 9/13 7/17 DES/BMS 8/28 7/20 - 9/21 endpoint MACCE TVF MACE RS p 0.001 0.004 0.09 0.03 Invasive Primary RS,% MACE,%
  • 5.
    The purpose ofthis study was to evaluate the clinical results 3 years after implantation of DES vs BMS in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI Purpose
  • 6.
    STEMI n=626 Randomization+ Distal Protection - Distal Protection Bare Metal Stent MACE Angiography - QCA / MACE 1 month 15 months Bare Metal Stent Drug Eluting Stent Drug Eluting Stent Flow chart Post Procedure Angiography - QCA MACE MACE 8 months 3 years
  • 7.
    STEMI n=626 Randomization+ Distal Protection - Distal Protection Bare Metal Stent MACE Angiography - QCA / MACE 1 month 15 months Bare Metal Stent Drug Eluting Stent Drug Eluting Stent Flow chart Post Procedure Angiography - QCA MACE MACE 8 months 3 years
  • 8.
    MACE (cardiac death,re-infarction, TLR) at 3 years Cardiac death at 3 years Total mortality MI TLR TVR Stroke Endpoints
  • 9.
    Major inclusion criteriaPatients who presented with the symptoms and signs of a first time large STEMI Chest pain ≤ 12 hours duration ST-elevation > 4 mm in contiguous leads High grade stenosis/occlusion of a native coronary artery that could be crossed with a guidewire
  • 10.
    Major exclusion criteriaHistory of a previous myocardial infarction Left main stem stenosis Gastrointestinal bleeding within 1 month Expected survival < 1 year Linguistic difficulties needing an interpretor
  • 11.
    Screened patients 1687Included patients 626 Excluded patients 1061 216 Clinically or psychologically instability / unconsciousness 162 ST-elevation < 4 mm 141 Participation in another study 140 Vessel unsuitable for filterwire 78 Onset symptoms >12 hours 72 Linguistic problems 68 Screening log not filled in 58 Previous infarction 43 Severe other disease 35 Refused to participate 26 Significant left main stenosis - 22 Other 24 deaths 83 lost to re-angiography Study Flow 543 patients for re-angiography 602 patients for 8-month FU 573 patients for 3-year FU 29 deaths
  • 12.
    STEMI - PPCI n: 626 Randomization Drug Eluting Stent n: 313 Bare Metal Stent n: 313 Number of Patients
  • 13.
    Baseline clinical characteristics DES n=313 BMS n=313 p 0.41 0.93 0.30 0.67 0.54 0.88 0.87 0.45 0.20 0.56 0.69 0.63 63 73.5 11.5 34.0 21.4 54.7 38.2 0.47 7.1 5.4 200 25 62 72.8 9.3 32.3 18.7 52.7 37.3 0.48 6.1 4.5 197 25 Age (years) Male gender (%) Diabetes Mellitus (%) Hypertension (%) Hyperlipidemia (%) Current smoker (%) Family history of CAD (%) Left ventricular ejection fraction Previous myocardial infarction (%) Previous PCI / CABG (%) Symptom onset to arrival, min Door-to-balloon, min
  • 14.
    Baseline lesion characteristics 0.27 DES n=313 BMS n=313 p 0.57 0.47 38 14 48 61 29 10 70 30 44 11 45 65 25 10 65 35 Infarct related coronary artery (%) LAD CX RCA Number of diseased vessel (%) 1 vessel disease 2 vessel disease 3 vessel disease Baseline TIMI flow TIMI 0-1 TIMI 2-3
  • 15.
    Procedural results DESn=313 BMS n=313 p 0.21 0.33 0.38 0.29 0.52 0.13 0.86 0.20 1.00 0.73 95 72 42 98 1.3 21.0 3.53 16.3 90 99 97 74 40 99 1.3 22.2 3.54 16.7 90 98 Use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, % Visible thrombus,% Filterwire used, % Stent implanted, % Number of stents per lesion Stented length, mm Stent diameter, mm Max deployment pressure, mm Hg TIMI III post procedure Procedural success, %
  • 16.
    P=0.084 P=0.013 P=0.58P=0.45 P<0.001 P<0.001 P=0.64 P=0.024 MACE during 3 years
  • 17.
    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 P=0.028 DES BMS 100 80 60 40 Freedom from MACE Freedom from MACE Days
  • 18.
    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 P=0.059 DES BMS 100 80 60 40 Freedom from all-cause mortality (%) Freedom from all-cause mortality Days
  • 19.
    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 P=0.008 DES BMS 100 80 60 40 Freedom from cardiac mortality (%) Freedom from cardiac mortality Days
  • 20.
    10 8 64 2 0 P=0.511 DES BMS Cumulative incidence (%) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Any stent thrombosis Days
  • 21.
    10 8 64 2 0 P=0.296 DES BMS Cumulative incidence (%) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Definite stent thrombosis Days
  • 22.
    0 0.5 1.00.5 2.0 no DM 561 11.3 17.7 DM 65 13.8 22.2 Female 168 10.6 24.1 Male 458 11.8 16.1 Age  63 311 13.7 17.1 Age < 63 315 9.4 19.4 All 626 11.5 18.2 Group n DES BMS DES better BMS better Odds Ratio (95% CI) Rate of MACE (%) Subgroup analysis CX / RCA 368 9.4 16.4 LAD 258 14.8 20.6 Stent length  18 mm 310 9.5 17.9 Stent length > 18 mm 309 12.9 17.8 No visible thrombus 168 11.1 24.1 Visible thrombus 458 11.6 15.9 Ref D  3.1 mm 299 12.0 20.8 Ref D > 3.1 mm 317 9.6 15.6
  • 23.
    0 0.5 1.00.5 2.0 no DM 561 11.3 17.7 DM 65 13.8 22.2 Female 168 10.6 24.1 Male 458 11.8 16.1 Age  63 311 13.7 17.1 Age < 63 315 9.4 19.4 All 626 11.5 18.2 Group n DES BMS DES better BMS better Odds Ratio (95% CI) Rate of MACE (%) Subgroup analysis CX / RCA 368 9.4 16.4 LAD 258 14.8 20.6 Stent length  18 mm 310 9.5 17.9 Stent length > 18 mm 309 12.9 17.8 No visible thrombus 168 11.1 24.1 Visible thrombus 458 11.6 15.9 Ref D  3.1 mm 299 12.0 20.8 Ref D > 3.1 mm 317 9.6 15.6
  • 24.
    0 0.5 1.00.5 2.0 no DM 561 11.3 17.7 DM 65 13.8 22.2 Female 168 10.6 24.1 Male 458 11.8 16.1 Age  63 311 13.7 17.1 Age < 63 315 9.4 19.4 All 626 11.5 18.2 Group n DES BMS DES better BMS better Odds Ratio (95% CI) Rate of MACE (%) Subgroup analysis CX / RCA 368 9.4 16.4 LAD 258 14.8 20.6 Stent length  18 mm 310 9.5 17.9 Stent length > 18 mm 309 12.9 17.8 No visible thrombus 168 11.1 24.1 Visible thrombus 458 11.6 15.9 Ref D  3.1 mm 299 12.0 20.8 Ref D > 3.1 mm 317 9.6 15.6
  • 25.
    0 0.5 1.00.5 2.0 no DM 561 11.3 17.7 DM 65 13.8 22.2 Female 168 10.6 24.1 Male 458 11.8 16.1 Age  63 311 13.7 17.1 Age < 63 315 9.4 19.4 All 626 11.5 18.2 Group n DES BMS DES better BMS better Odds Ratio (95% CI) Rate of MACE (%) Subgroup analysis CX / RCA 368 9.4 16.4 LAD 258 14.8 20.6 Stent length  18 mm 310 9.5 17.9 Stent length > 18 mm 309 12.9 17.8 No visible thrombus 168 11.1 24.1 Visible thrombus 458 11.6 15.9 Ref D  3.1 mm 299 12.0 20.8 Ref D > 3.1 mm 317 9.6 15.6
  • 26.
    reduced the rateof MACE and the need for repeat revascularization Conclusions In the DEDICATION trial implantation of DES (compared with BMS) in STEMI patients was not associated with an increased rate of myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis was associated with an increased risk of cardiac death