TOTAL WRIST ACCESS FOR 
PRIMARY PCI 
SINGLE CENTER REGISTRY OF 2624 CONSECUTIVE 
PATIENTS WITH ACUTE ST ELEVATION 
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION 
OLIVER KALPAK 
UNIVERSITY CLINIC FOR CARDIOLOGY 
SKOPJE 
MACEDONIA
Disclosures: Nothing to disclose 
• Authors: 
• Oliver Kalpak (presenting ) 
• Antov S., Kostov J., Pejkov H., Spiroski I., Boshev M., Vasilev I., 
Zafirovska B., Kedev S. 
• University Clinic of Cardiology 
• Medical Faculty -Univ. St Cyril And Methodius 
• Skopje 
• Macedonia
Background: Why TRA for STEMI 
• TRA is associated with significant clinical benefit in STEMI 
patients 
• TRA is associated with lower Mortality and MACE rates in High 
volume STEMI PCI Center 
• Primary PCI in STEMI Patients A Meta-Analysis of RCT Karrowni (JACC2013) 
• RIFLE STEACS Romagnoli et all (JACC 2012) 
• RIVAL Jolly et al (Lancet 2011) 
• STEMI RADIAL Bernat (JACC 2014) 
• Operator volume RIVAL Jolly et al (JACC 2014) 
• TRA for STEMI and Shock Pancholy TCT 2014
Meta analysis RA vs FA for STEMI
Transferred Access strategy for STEMI 
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
800 
700 
600 
500 
400 
300 
200 
100 
0 
TRA+TUA 25 170 358 609 581 567 745 
TFA 72 310 241 23 8 2 1 
N 97 480 599 632 589 569 746 
Number of patients
Completely transferred Access for STEMI PCI 
74.5% 
64.9% 
25.5% 35.1% 
59.6% 
95.3% 98.50% 99.70% 99.9% 
40.4% 
4.7% 
1.50% 0.30% 0.1% 
5.7% 5.8% 4.4% 1.6% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 
100% 
90% 
80% 
70% 
60% 
50% 
40% 
30% 
20% 
10% 
0% 
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
crossover to TFA TRA + TUA TFA
TRANSITIONING TO THE RADIAL APPROACH FOR PRIMARY PCI 
14.0% 
12.0% 
10.0% 
8.0% 
6.0% 
4.0% 
2.0% 
0.0% 
Single Center Registry of 1808 STEMI patients 
TRA TFA 
OR 0.55 (0.39-0.76) 
OR 0.46 (0.32-0.66) p<0.001 
p<0.001 
OR 0.11 (0.05-0.20) 
p<0.000 
30Days mortality Major Vascular Bleeding 30 Days MACE 
KEDEV ,et al. J INVASIVE CARDIOL 2014;26(9):475-482
Total Wrist Access for STEMI in our Center 
• 2624 consecutive STEMI PCI patients during 4 years (2010 to 2013) 
• 7 operators with high volume TRA experience 
• Default TRA access strategy for all interventions 
• 98.7% Wrist ( TRA +TUA) and 1.3% TFA 
• Second choice was ipsilateral Ulnar or left Radial or Ulnar artery 
and last choice Femoral artery
Mortality and MACE at 30 days and 6 months 
20 
15 
10 
5 
0 
6,6% 
8,6% 
5,0% 5,6% 
30 Days 6 months 
MACE Mortality 
N=2624 n % 
30 d Mortality 131 5.0 
30 d MACE 174 6.6 
6 m Mortality 147 5.6 
6m MACE 226 8.6
Total Wrist Access for STEMI 
98,7% 
1,3% 
Wrist (TRA+TUA) 2589 patients TFA 35 patients
Crossover from Default Right Radial Access Strategy 
144 out of 2624 patients 
48% 
28% 
24% 
L Radial Ulnar Femoral
Artery Access in 2624 STEMI PCI 
94,5 % 
2,6% 1,6% 1,3% 
R Radial L Radial Ulnar Femoral
Radial for STEMI and Crossover rates in literature 
Center/Author N % Radial 
% Crossover to 
TFA 
Macedonia/Kalpak 
AIM Radial 2014 2624 94.5 1.3 
UK/Mammas 
JACC BCIS database 2013 48603 39.1 5.1 
UK/Hetherington 
Heart 2009 1051 54.2 7.7 
Holland/ Vink 
Heart 2011 2209 96.1 3.8 
Belgium/Dangoisse 
Eurointervention 2013 3600 46.4 1.3 
Italy /Valgimigli 
JACC REAL reg. 2012 11068 27.7 7.7-3.5
Conclusions 
• TotalWrist Access was achieved in our high volume dedicated 
TRA Center 
• Total Wrist Access is safe and feasible for STEMI and it was 
linked with low mortality and cardiovascular events rates in 
unselected all-comers cohort 
• Default TRA strategy was associated with low crossover rate 
• Crossover towards femoral access was lower than crossover 
towards left radial and ulnar
THANK YOU

Kalpak O - AIMRADIAL 2014 - Total wrist access for STEMI

  • 1.
    TOTAL WRIST ACCESSFOR PRIMARY PCI SINGLE CENTER REGISTRY OF 2624 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH ACUTE ST ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION OLIVER KALPAK UNIVERSITY CLINIC FOR CARDIOLOGY SKOPJE MACEDONIA
  • 2.
    Disclosures: Nothing todisclose • Authors: • Oliver Kalpak (presenting ) • Antov S., Kostov J., Pejkov H., Spiroski I., Boshev M., Vasilev I., Zafirovska B., Kedev S. • University Clinic of Cardiology • Medical Faculty -Univ. St Cyril And Methodius • Skopje • Macedonia
  • 3.
    Background: Why TRAfor STEMI • TRA is associated with significant clinical benefit in STEMI patients • TRA is associated with lower Mortality and MACE rates in High volume STEMI PCI Center • Primary PCI in STEMI Patients A Meta-Analysis of RCT Karrowni (JACC2013) • RIFLE STEACS Romagnoli et all (JACC 2012) • RIVAL Jolly et al (Lancet 2011) • STEMI RADIAL Bernat (JACC 2014) • Operator volume RIVAL Jolly et al (JACC 2014) • TRA for STEMI and Shock Pancholy TCT 2014
  • 4.
    Meta analysis RAvs FA for STEMI
  • 5.
    Transferred Access strategyfor STEMI 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 TRA+TUA 25 170 358 609 581 567 745 TFA 72 310 241 23 8 2 1 N 97 480 599 632 589 569 746 Number of patients
  • 6.
    Completely transferred Accessfor STEMI PCI 74.5% 64.9% 25.5% 35.1% 59.6% 95.3% 98.50% 99.70% 99.9% 40.4% 4.7% 1.50% 0.30% 0.1% 5.7% 5.8% 4.4% 1.6% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 crossover to TFA TRA + TUA TFA
  • 7.
    TRANSITIONING TO THERADIAL APPROACH FOR PRIMARY PCI 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% Single Center Registry of 1808 STEMI patients TRA TFA OR 0.55 (0.39-0.76) OR 0.46 (0.32-0.66) p<0.001 p<0.001 OR 0.11 (0.05-0.20) p<0.000 30Days mortality Major Vascular Bleeding 30 Days MACE KEDEV ,et al. J INVASIVE CARDIOL 2014;26(9):475-482
  • 8.
    Total Wrist Accessfor STEMI in our Center • 2624 consecutive STEMI PCI patients during 4 years (2010 to 2013) • 7 operators with high volume TRA experience • Default TRA access strategy for all interventions • 98.7% Wrist ( TRA +TUA) and 1.3% TFA • Second choice was ipsilateral Ulnar or left Radial or Ulnar artery and last choice Femoral artery
  • 9.
    Mortality and MACEat 30 days and 6 months 20 15 10 5 0 6,6% 8,6% 5,0% 5,6% 30 Days 6 months MACE Mortality N=2624 n % 30 d Mortality 131 5.0 30 d MACE 174 6.6 6 m Mortality 147 5.6 6m MACE 226 8.6
  • 10.
    Total Wrist Accessfor STEMI 98,7% 1,3% Wrist (TRA+TUA) 2589 patients TFA 35 patients
  • 11.
    Crossover from DefaultRight Radial Access Strategy 144 out of 2624 patients 48% 28% 24% L Radial Ulnar Femoral
  • 12.
    Artery Access in2624 STEMI PCI 94,5 % 2,6% 1,6% 1,3% R Radial L Radial Ulnar Femoral
  • 13.
    Radial for STEMIand Crossover rates in literature Center/Author N % Radial % Crossover to TFA Macedonia/Kalpak AIM Radial 2014 2624 94.5 1.3 UK/Mammas JACC BCIS database 2013 48603 39.1 5.1 UK/Hetherington Heart 2009 1051 54.2 7.7 Holland/ Vink Heart 2011 2209 96.1 3.8 Belgium/Dangoisse Eurointervention 2013 3600 46.4 1.3 Italy /Valgimigli JACC REAL reg. 2012 11068 27.7 7.7-3.5
  • 14.
    Conclusions • TotalWristAccess was achieved in our high volume dedicated TRA Center • Total Wrist Access is safe and feasible for STEMI and it was linked with low mortality and cardiovascular events rates in unselected all-comers cohort • Default TRA strategy was associated with low crossover rate • Crossover towards femoral access was lower than crossover towards left radial and ulnar
  • 15.