The document discusses the 'Core Protocols', which are systems of rules designed to enhance interpersonal collaboration in formal settings, emphasizing self-awareness, connection, and productive decision-making. It describes various techniques such as check-ins, intention checks, and the 'perfection game' for improving team dynamics and outcomes. The content is based on a review of practices developed and validated over the past twelve years.

1. Peter Antman,March 2016
peter.antman@crisp.se
@peterantman

2. Pro-to-col
a system of rules
that explain
the correct conduct and procedures
to be followed in formal situations

3. The core protocols
”It encapsulates and makes accessible the
best interpersonal collaboration technology
currently available and has been
thoroughly researched, tested and applied
over the past twelve year”
Michele McCarthy
Jim McCarthy

4. Let’s …
Yea, but
no…
How did that feel?

5. Let’s …
Yea,
and lets
also…
How did that feel?

6. From Richard Kasperowski, http://kasperowski.com

7. Positive biasSay Yes.
Non negativity
No negation
Pretend
Freedom
 Right to pass
 Check outLaw of two feet
Self awarenessListen to your self
 Check-in
 Personal alignment
ConnectionListen to other
 Investigate
 Intention check
 Ask for help
Productivity
 Decider
 Resolution
 Perfection game
Focus on result
From Richard Kasperowski, http://kasperowski.com

8. Positive biasSay Yes.
Non negativity
No negation
Pretend
Are you
ready to try this?
From Richard Kasperowski, http://kasperowski.com

9. Positive biasSay Yes.
Non negativity
No negation
Pretend
Freedom
 Right to pass
 Check outLaw of two feet
The right to Pass
– Theright do decline participation
without being questioned
Check out
– Your physical presencesignifies your
engagement
– If your are notengaged.Checkout and leave
– Leave.No one asksor try to get you back.
I pass I’m checking
out

10. Positive biasSay Yes.
Non negativity
No negation
Pretend
Freedom
 Right to pass
 Check outLaw of two feet
Self awarenessListen to your self
 Check-in
 Personal alignment
Check in
– Start meeting byactively being there and
share yourstate
I feel (MAD; SAD;
GLAD; AFRAID)
Because
(optional)
I am in

11.  I feel _________ (one or more of MAD; SAD; GLAD; AFRAID)
 Optional: Because
 I am in
Letstry it
Listeners welcomes.
Do not question.
Do not tell others
about it.
From Richard Kasperowski, http://kasperowski.com

12. 1 2
How did that feel?
3
Count together

13. 1 clapp
How did that feel?
3
Count together

14. Positive biasSay Yes.
Non negativity
No negation
Pretend
Freedom
 Right to pass
 Check outLaw of two feet
Self awarenessListen to your self
 Check-in
 Personal alignment
ConnectionListen to other
 Investigate
 Intention check
 Ask for help

15. – Learn more about others
– As questions until your curiosity is satisfied
– Openquestions, avoid why.
– “What…?”
Investigate I am
curious
What…
?

16. Letstry it I am quirous, what made you
say you where (MAD; SAD;
GLAD; AFRAID)?

17. – Clearify the purpose of your own or
anothers behaviour
– Don’t ask if you do not have a peaceful
intention your self. Check-out insted.
– “What is your intention with...?”
Intention check
What is
your
intention
with...?

18. – Usethe skills and knowledge of others
– Say No if you do not want to. AcceptNo without drama
– ”NAME, will you …?”
Ask forhelp
NAME, will
you help
me with...?

19. Positive biasSay Yes.
Non negativity
No negation
Pretend
Freedom
 Right to pass
 Check outLaw of two feet
Self awarenessListen to your self
 Check-in
 Personal alignment
ConnectionListen to other
 Investigate
 Intention check
 Ask for help
Productivity
 Decider
 Resolution
 Perfection game
Focus on result

20. – Useto improvethings
– Rate 1 –10
– ”What I liked was…”
– “... would make it a 10”.
Perfection game What I
liked was... ZZZ would
make it a
10.
This was
and 8 for
mee

21. Decider & Resolution
I
propose
...
Yes
OK
*
* or flat hand
No
I will never
support this.
Instead I
suggest...
What would
it take to get
you in?
Abandon if to few yes, or
to many no or a block.

22.  How many unanimous decisions can you make in 2 minutes?
 Goal: plan a party
 Small groups:
– Venue
– Food
– People
– Budget
Decider speed game
From Richard Kasperowski, http://kasperowski.com

23. Crisp consensus
I
propose
...
Yes
Not sure
Block
But I am
available to
talk.
I have this
concern...
Stand aside

24. Sociocracy consent
I
propose
...
Round 2
I have this
objection...
Round 1
I want this
clarified...
1. Reasoned
2. Motivated
Any one
against?

25. Advice
I would like
to do this,
do you
know of
any
objections?
I would not
do it
Have you
though
about this?
Great idea

26. Askforgivenes
I did this.
That sucks!
How can I
compensate?
Great!

27. Positive biasSay Yes.
Non negativity
No negation
Pretend
Freedom
 Right to pass
 Check outLaw of two feet
Self awarenessListen to your self
 Check-in
 Personal alignment
ConnectionListen to other
 Investigate
 Intention check
 Ask for help
Productivity
 Decider
 Resolution
 Perfection game
Focus on result

28.  http://kasperowski.com/
 https://speakerd.s3.amazonaws.com/presentations/9e19c8f6128445e794
174f0e8e02c19f/Bay_ALN_and_PMI_Agile_Maine_2015-01-19.pdf
 http://www.mccarthyshow.com/online/
 http://liveingreatness.com/core-protocols/
 http://sociocracy30.org/the-details/circles-and-decision-making/
 http://blog.crisp.se/2014/03/27/peterantman/crisp-consensus-model-2-1
References