Cola Wars
•Download as PPT, PDF•
3 likes•5,780 views
The document summarizes the 100-year rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi in 3 paragraphs: Coca-Cola and Pepsi initially competed for market share through carbonated soft drinks and focused on bottlers, retailers, and suppliers. Coca-Cola was first to franchise but struggled with acceptance due to inexperience. It began acquiring bottlers to boost competition. In the 21st century, competition centered on emerging international markets and expanding beyond carbonated soft drinks. Price wars in the 1990s focused on low-price strategies. Globally, Coca-Cola dominated with 51.4% market share compared to Pepsi's 21.8%. Coca-Cola faced challenges including execution
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Asha cola wars
The document summarizes the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi from 2010. It provides histories of how each company was founded and evolved over time. Coca-Cola was formulated in 1886 and went public in 1919. Pepsi was created in 1893 and struggled before growing during the Great Depression. Both companies diversified their product lines beyond cola to respond to health concerns and a declining carbonated soft drinks market. They also expanded their international operations and adapted their strategies and relationships over time to remain competitive in the cola wars.
Cola Wars Continues - 2006
Cola Wars have continues till date. This presentation presents an analysis of the case Cola wars continues in 2006.
Find out what we have to say about the classic case of competition.
Cola Wars Spring2008 Tigers
This document summarizes the history and competition between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo in the cola industry. It discusses how Coca-Cola was founded in 1886 and PepsiCo in 1893. Throughout the 20th century, the two companies grew significantly and became major competitors in the cola industry. The document also analyzes Porter's Five Forces model and how consolidation among bottlers impacted industry profits. It notes that Coca-Cola and PepsiCo have majority market share in the cola industry but face challenges from health trends moving consumers to non-carbonated drinks.
Cola wars 2010
The major cost drivers for bottlers were direct store delivery, promotional payments to retailers, capital-intensive bottling process, concentrate costs dependent on supplier prices, and investments in distribution networks. Coke and Pepsi managed rivalry by targeting different demographics, aggressive Pepsi marketing, plant modernization, concentrate price differences, flavor experimentation, and rebates/price cuts. The companies should focus on emerging market expansion, healthier products, sustainability initiatives, and innovation to face challenges rather than short-term tactics against each other.
Coke Pepsi rivalry
The document summarizes the cola wars between Coke and Pepsi in India from the 1970s to late 1990s. It describes how Coke and Pepsi entered and competed for market share in India. Both companies engaged in aggressive advertising and marketing campaigns targeting each other. Their strategies included espionage of each other's offices, poaching employees, and actions aimed at disrupting the other's business operations through bottlers and retailers. The cola wars involved unethical tactics from both companies and raised issues around celebrities and intellectual property in advertising.
Cola wars continue
The document summarizes the history and competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi from 1886 to 2006. It discusses how each company was founded and grew initially. In the late 20th century, both experienced ups and downs as consumption levels fluctuated and they launched new products and diversified. Pepsi became more aggressive in adapting to trends like the rise of non-carbonated drinks, while Coke struggled with execution issues. By 2004, Pepsi had grown its portfolio beyond cola drinks and achieved higher market shares across categories through proactive strategies.
Cola wars continue final
The document provides a history and overview of Coke and Pepsi in 2006. It discusses the origins of each company in the late 1800s and their growth throughout the 20th century. It also analyzes their strategies, marketing, relationships with bottlers, and challenges faced in the 2000s from declining soda consumption and rising alternatives. Both companies diversified their portfolios and pursued international growth to address the changing landscape.
Coke_Case_Assignment
The document provides details about Coca-Cola and the introduction and failure of New Coke. It discusses Coca-Cola's early success through brand building and distribution. In the 1970s and 80s, Coca-Cola lost market share to Pepsi and introduced New Coke based on consumer tests. However, New Coke was a failure as consumers missed the original formula, so Coca-Cola reintroduced Coke Classic and regained market leadership.
Recommended
Asha cola wars
The document summarizes the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi from 2010. It provides histories of how each company was founded and evolved over time. Coca-Cola was formulated in 1886 and went public in 1919. Pepsi was created in 1893 and struggled before growing during the Great Depression. Both companies diversified their product lines beyond cola to respond to health concerns and a declining carbonated soft drinks market. They also expanded their international operations and adapted their strategies and relationships over time to remain competitive in the cola wars.
Cola Wars Continues - 2006
Cola Wars have continues till date. This presentation presents an analysis of the case Cola wars continues in 2006.
Find out what we have to say about the classic case of competition.
Cola Wars Spring2008 Tigers
This document summarizes the history and competition between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo in the cola industry. It discusses how Coca-Cola was founded in 1886 and PepsiCo in 1893. Throughout the 20th century, the two companies grew significantly and became major competitors in the cola industry. The document also analyzes Porter's Five Forces model and how consolidation among bottlers impacted industry profits. It notes that Coca-Cola and PepsiCo have majority market share in the cola industry but face challenges from health trends moving consumers to non-carbonated drinks.
Cola wars 2010
The major cost drivers for bottlers were direct store delivery, promotional payments to retailers, capital-intensive bottling process, concentrate costs dependent on supplier prices, and investments in distribution networks. Coke and Pepsi managed rivalry by targeting different demographics, aggressive Pepsi marketing, plant modernization, concentrate price differences, flavor experimentation, and rebates/price cuts. The companies should focus on emerging market expansion, healthier products, sustainability initiatives, and innovation to face challenges rather than short-term tactics against each other.
Coke Pepsi rivalry
The document summarizes the cola wars between Coke and Pepsi in India from the 1970s to late 1990s. It describes how Coke and Pepsi entered and competed for market share in India. Both companies engaged in aggressive advertising and marketing campaigns targeting each other. Their strategies included espionage of each other's offices, poaching employees, and actions aimed at disrupting the other's business operations through bottlers and retailers. The cola wars involved unethical tactics from both companies and raised issues around celebrities and intellectual property in advertising.
Cola wars continue
The document summarizes the history and competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi from 1886 to 2006. It discusses how each company was founded and grew initially. In the late 20th century, both experienced ups and downs as consumption levels fluctuated and they launched new products and diversified. Pepsi became more aggressive in adapting to trends like the rise of non-carbonated drinks, while Coke struggled with execution issues. By 2004, Pepsi had grown its portfolio beyond cola drinks and achieved higher market shares across categories through proactive strategies.
Cola wars continue final
The document provides a history and overview of Coke and Pepsi in 2006. It discusses the origins of each company in the late 1800s and their growth throughout the 20th century. It also analyzes their strategies, marketing, relationships with bottlers, and challenges faced in the 2000s from declining soda consumption and rising alternatives. Both companies diversified their portfolios and pursued international growth to address the changing landscape.
Coke_Case_Assignment
The document provides details about Coca-Cola and the introduction and failure of New Coke. It discusses Coca-Cola's early success through brand building and distribution. In the 1970s and 80s, Coca-Cola lost market share to Pepsi and introduced New Coke based on consumer tests. However, New Coke was a failure as consumers missed the original formula, so Coca-Cola reintroduced Coke Classic and regained market leadership.
Case Study Analysis on Mountain Man Brewing Company : Bringing the Brand to ...
This case study analyzes Mountain Man Brewing Company and its plan to launch a new light beer brand called Mountain Man Light. Key details:
- Mountain Man Brewing was founded in 1925 and produces Mountain Man Lager, which is the top-selling beer in West Virginia.
- Light beer sales have been growing 4% annually, while traditional beer sales have declined by the same rate.
- The company wants to launch Mountain Man Light to tap into the growing light beer market but faces competition from large brewers.
- There are concerns that the new light brand could cannibalize sales of the core Mountain Man Lager brand. The case examines marketing strategies and risks of the brand extension plan.
Coca Cola vs Pepsi
The document analyzes the global soft drink industry using Porter's Five Forces model. It discusses the high level of rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi, who together control 74.8% of the market. The threat of substitutes is also high given the many alternative beverage options. The document recommends that in India, Coca-Cola should develop its strategy to tap into the large rural market, pursue consolidation opportunities, and develop "nutritious" beverages to address health concerns.
Sprite Branding Elements
The document discusses strategic brand management for the Sprite brand. It includes an agenda covering topics like brand audit map, history, personality, customer segmentation, positioning, promotional campaigns, competition, metrics and recommendations. The brand aims to own all pillars of South African hip hop culture and provide a platform for youth expression. It targets 16-19 year olds and focuses on leveraging hip hop to showcase self expression and help consumers maintain their cool in intense moments.
Coca Cola Product Presentation
The group is studying Coca-Cola and has identified its core values, vision, and mission. Coca-Cola is the world's largest beverage company serving over 1.6 billion drinks per day in over 200 countries. It employs over 92,000 people and has over 3000 brands. The group will analyze Coca-Cola's strategies, financial performance, industry environment, and leadership style to understand how it has achieved global success.
Cola wars case presentation
This document analyzes the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi using Porter's five forces model. It discusses the industry background and key events in 1886 and 1893. It finds that supplier power and buyer power are low due to commoditized raw materials and franchise agreements weakening bottlers' bargaining power. The threat of substitutes is high given many low-cost alternatives and customer switching costs. New entry threats are low due to high costs but rivalry is strong. The document concludes that the substitutes force is changing most as health concerns reduce carbonated soft drink consumption.
PESTEL ON COCA COLA
Coca-Cola entered the Chinese market in the 1920s and established several bottling plants before withdrawing in 1949. In 1978, China adopted an open door policy and Coca-Cola re-entered China in 1979, first using a franchise model and later transitioning to joint ventures. Coca-Cola has since grown its operations and market share in China through strategic marketing, product innovation, and adapting to Chinese culture and consumer preferences. However, the company also faces challenges from regulations, competition, and changing consumer trends in China.
Case analysis coke_pepsi
This document analyzes the soft drink industry, specifically Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, and discusses factors that contribute to the profitability of concentrate producers over bottlers. It examines Porter's five forces and determines that suppliers, buyers, substitutes and potential entrants do not greatly threaten the industry's profitability. While internal rivalry is intense between Coke and Pepsi, they primarily compete through advertising rather than lowering prices. The document concludes that vertical integration of concentrate producers into bottling may not be necessary, as bottlers already have incentives to cooperate, and contract amendments could ensure efficient investment in bottling infrastructure.
Coke vs pepsi ppt
Coca-Cola and Pepsi are the two largest beverage companies in the world that compete for market share. Both companies target the mass market globally using similar segmentation strategies including geographical, demographic, and psychographic segmentation. They utilize brand ambassadors and localized branding and advertising campaigns. While Coca-Cola is preferred by some for its stronger carbonation, Pepsi has a sweeter taste and appeals more to youth; however, consumer preference ultimately comes down to personal taste.
Cola war continues: Coke and Pepsi 21st century and battle for Internationa...
This document provides background information on the consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSDs) in the United States from 1970 to 2010. It discusses the history of Coca-Cola and Pepsi, how CSDs are produced and distributed, Porter's five forces analysis of the CSD industry, and the strategic approaches taken by Coke and Pepsi over two stages from 1970 to 2010. It also analyzes the entry and competition between Coke and Pepsi in the Indian market.
Cola Wars
Presentation on Cola Wars between Coke and Pepsi
(Presented in Marketing Planning and Implementation-1 Course at MDI Gurgaon)
P.S- Please feel free to share your views in comments.
Brandmanagement cocacola-130311022539-phpapp01
Coca-Cola was developed in 1886 and has since had many owners. It grew significantly after bottling rights were sold in 1899, establishing an important bottler model. Today, Coca-Cola has over 3000 brands across 200 countries. It has become one of the most recognized brands globally due to strong marketing, including iconic packaging and advertising slogans. The company aims to refresh people while creating shared experiences and optimism.
cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
The document discusses the economics of the US carbonated soft drink industry from 1970 to 2004, focusing on how Coca-Cola and PepsiCo came to dominate the market through establishing production and distribution networks as well as engaging in competitive marketing campaigns. It analyzes the strategies employed by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo that allowed them to gain and maintain market share over smaller brands, such as expanding their product portfolios and establishing international presences.
Cola wars Case Study Analysis
The carbonated soft drink (CSD's) industry was dominated by Coca Cola and Pepsi vying for market share. The CSD organizations gained market share in the U.S. and in global markets extending their brands’ recognition and capturing sales from new markets. The shift in consumer beverage preference and the expansion into global markets proved to uncover new opportunities for growth and profitability. In addition the changes in the organizational structure of business for these companies have allowed them to sustain growth beyond CSD’s.
Cola Wars
The document discusses the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi. It provides background on how Pepsi attacked Coke on its home turf in the US after Coke started focusing overseas. It analyzes the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of both companies. It also examines the competitive strategies employed by each over the decades, including new product lines, marketing campaigns, pricing strategies, and acquisitions. Both companies have established a duopoly in the soft drink market through aggressive competition and global expansion.
Marketing Analysis of Coke(Coca cola)
Coca-Cola has been operating in Pakistan since 1953. It analyzes the market environment through PEST, SWOT, and competitive analyses. Coke focuses on consumer demand and being a responsible corporate citizen. It has a diverse product portfolio and seeks to maximize shareholder returns through strategies like brand building, expanding distribution, and sales promotions.
Wac
The document is a case analysis report for Big Boom Beverages regarding their caffeinated alcoholic beverage "Totaled". It summarizes that BBB is facing potential regulatory action from the FDA due to health issues linked to underage binge drinking of Totaled. The report evaluates alternatives for BBB, concluding they should acknowledge mistakes, educate consumers, and work with the FDA to address issues rather than ignore warnings. Implementing robust awareness campaigns on platforms like Facebook and working with retailers is recommended to improve compliance with responsible drinking guidelines. A contingency plan is also advised in case the situation worsens.
Launch of New coke
This case study examines Coca-Cola's launch of New Coke in 1985. Due to declining market share against Pepsi in the 1970s and 1980s, Coca-Cola reformulated its 99-year old formula. Market research showed dissatisfaction with the new formula, but it was launched as New Coke anyway. New Coke was heavily promoted but failed to meet consumer expectations, tasting too similar to Pepsi. It was perceived as a "me-too" product and replaced by Coca-Cola Classic in July 1985. The rapid failure of New Coke and success of the return to Coca-Cola Classic has led some to believe the launch was deliberately engineered to boost sales of the original formula.
Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India
This case study examines Coke and Pepsi's entry and competition in the Indian market. It discusses the political environment in India, the timing of each company's entry, and their growth strategies. Pepsi entered earlier in 1986 while Coke entered later in 1993 after buying local brands from Parle. Both companies localized their products and promotions to the Indian market but Coke made some mistakes by entering at the wrong time and overpromising to the government. In the long run, Pepsi had more market share and a wider regional presence due to more successful advertising. Overall, the case suggests that careful evaluation of political risks and relationships with local governments are important lessons from operating in India.
Mountain Man Brewing Company:Bringing the Brand to Light
The document discusses the history and current state of Mountain Man Lager, an independent brewery founded in 1925 in West Virginia. It was well established by the 1960s but now faces declining sales and changing consumer preferences toward lighter beers. The company generates $50 million annually from its sole brand but revenues were down 2% in 2005. Younger consumers prefer light beers which provide an opportunity. The CEO has to decide whether to stick with the original brand, launch a new light brand, or extend the Mountain Man brand into light beer. Introducing a Mountain Man Light brand leverages existing brand equity and distribution while reaching a new demographic and has the best chance of profitability within two years.
Chateau Margaux Marketing Plan
Chateau Margaux produces prestigious wines regarded for their quality, heritage, and brand equity. It is looking to launch a third wine, L'Elegante Margaux, to target new customer segments. The strategy is to position L'Elegante Margaux as offering the best value while avoiding cannibalizing existing wines. It will be priced at €120 per bottle and distributed off-premise through specialized merchants and e-commerce to attract connoisseurs and enthusiasts without competing directly with the flagship wines. Key metrics like sales, awareness, and profitability will be monitored to evaluate the strategy's success in growing the brand and business.
BCG matrix with example
The document discusses the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix, which classifies business units into four categories based on their relative market share and market growth rate: Question Marks, Stars, Cash Cows, and Dogs. Question Marks have high growth but low market share, requiring high investment. Stars have high growth and market share but also require heavy investment. Cash Cows have low growth but high market share, generating cash with little investment. Dogs have low growth and market share and are cash traps. The BCG Matrix helps assess a product portfolio, cash demands, resource allocation, and divestment decisions.
Sse Cola Wars Group8
The document discusses Porter's five forces analysis of the concentrate industry occupied by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. It finds the industry has high rivalry between the two major competitors and barriers to entry. There are many potential substitute products and buyer power is high due to various retail channels. Regulations differ between countries, affecting business operations on a global scale.
More Related Content
What's hot
Case Study Analysis on Mountain Man Brewing Company : Bringing the Brand to ...
This case study analyzes Mountain Man Brewing Company and its plan to launch a new light beer brand called Mountain Man Light. Key details:
- Mountain Man Brewing was founded in 1925 and produces Mountain Man Lager, which is the top-selling beer in West Virginia.
- Light beer sales have been growing 4% annually, while traditional beer sales have declined by the same rate.
- The company wants to launch Mountain Man Light to tap into the growing light beer market but faces competition from large brewers.
- There are concerns that the new light brand could cannibalize sales of the core Mountain Man Lager brand. The case examines marketing strategies and risks of the brand extension plan.
Coca Cola vs Pepsi
The document analyzes the global soft drink industry using Porter's Five Forces model. It discusses the high level of rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi, who together control 74.8% of the market. The threat of substitutes is also high given the many alternative beverage options. The document recommends that in India, Coca-Cola should develop its strategy to tap into the large rural market, pursue consolidation opportunities, and develop "nutritious" beverages to address health concerns.
Sprite Branding Elements
The document discusses strategic brand management for the Sprite brand. It includes an agenda covering topics like brand audit map, history, personality, customer segmentation, positioning, promotional campaigns, competition, metrics and recommendations. The brand aims to own all pillars of South African hip hop culture and provide a platform for youth expression. It targets 16-19 year olds and focuses on leveraging hip hop to showcase self expression and help consumers maintain their cool in intense moments.
Coca Cola Product Presentation
The group is studying Coca-Cola and has identified its core values, vision, and mission. Coca-Cola is the world's largest beverage company serving over 1.6 billion drinks per day in over 200 countries. It employs over 92,000 people and has over 3000 brands. The group will analyze Coca-Cola's strategies, financial performance, industry environment, and leadership style to understand how it has achieved global success.
Cola wars case presentation
This document analyzes the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi using Porter's five forces model. It discusses the industry background and key events in 1886 and 1893. It finds that supplier power and buyer power are low due to commoditized raw materials and franchise agreements weakening bottlers' bargaining power. The threat of substitutes is high given many low-cost alternatives and customer switching costs. New entry threats are low due to high costs but rivalry is strong. The document concludes that the substitutes force is changing most as health concerns reduce carbonated soft drink consumption.
PESTEL ON COCA COLA
Coca-Cola entered the Chinese market in the 1920s and established several bottling plants before withdrawing in 1949. In 1978, China adopted an open door policy and Coca-Cola re-entered China in 1979, first using a franchise model and later transitioning to joint ventures. Coca-Cola has since grown its operations and market share in China through strategic marketing, product innovation, and adapting to Chinese culture and consumer preferences. However, the company also faces challenges from regulations, competition, and changing consumer trends in China.
Case analysis coke_pepsi
This document analyzes the soft drink industry, specifically Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, and discusses factors that contribute to the profitability of concentrate producers over bottlers. It examines Porter's five forces and determines that suppliers, buyers, substitutes and potential entrants do not greatly threaten the industry's profitability. While internal rivalry is intense between Coke and Pepsi, they primarily compete through advertising rather than lowering prices. The document concludes that vertical integration of concentrate producers into bottling may not be necessary, as bottlers already have incentives to cooperate, and contract amendments could ensure efficient investment in bottling infrastructure.
Coke vs pepsi ppt
Coca-Cola and Pepsi are the two largest beverage companies in the world that compete for market share. Both companies target the mass market globally using similar segmentation strategies including geographical, demographic, and psychographic segmentation. They utilize brand ambassadors and localized branding and advertising campaigns. While Coca-Cola is preferred by some for its stronger carbonation, Pepsi has a sweeter taste and appeals more to youth; however, consumer preference ultimately comes down to personal taste.
Cola war continues: Coke and Pepsi 21st century and battle for Internationa...
This document provides background information on the consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSDs) in the United States from 1970 to 2010. It discusses the history of Coca-Cola and Pepsi, how CSDs are produced and distributed, Porter's five forces analysis of the CSD industry, and the strategic approaches taken by Coke and Pepsi over two stages from 1970 to 2010. It also analyzes the entry and competition between Coke and Pepsi in the Indian market.
Cola Wars
Presentation on Cola Wars between Coke and Pepsi
(Presented in Marketing Planning and Implementation-1 Course at MDI Gurgaon)
P.S- Please feel free to share your views in comments.
Brandmanagement cocacola-130311022539-phpapp01
Coca-Cola was developed in 1886 and has since had many owners. It grew significantly after bottling rights were sold in 1899, establishing an important bottler model. Today, Coca-Cola has over 3000 brands across 200 countries. It has become one of the most recognized brands globally due to strong marketing, including iconic packaging and advertising slogans. The company aims to refresh people while creating shared experiences and optimism.
cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
The document discusses the economics of the US carbonated soft drink industry from 1970 to 2004, focusing on how Coca-Cola and PepsiCo came to dominate the market through establishing production and distribution networks as well as engaging in competitive marketing campaigns. It analyzes the strategies employed by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo that allowed them to gain and maintain market share over smaller brands, such as expanding their product portfolios and establishing international presences.
Cola wars Case Study Analysis
The carbonated soft drink (CSD's) industry was dominated by Coca Cola and Pepsi vying for market share. The CSD organizations gained market share in the U.S. and in global markets extending their brands’ recognition and capturing sales from new markets. The shift in consumer beverage preference and the expansion into global markets proved to uncover new opportunities for growth and profitability. In addition the changes in the organizational structure of business for these companies have allowed them to sustain growth beyond CSD’s.
Cola Wars
The document discusses the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi. It provides background on how Pepsi attacked Coke on its home turf in the US after Coke started focusing overseas. It analyzes the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of both companies. It also examines the competitive strategies employed by each over the decades, including new product lines, marketing campaigns, pricing strategies, and acquisitions. Both companies have established a duopoly in the soft drink market through aggressive competition and global expansion.
Marketing Analysis of Coke(Coca cola)
Coca-Cola has been operating in Pakistan since 1953. It analyzes the market environment through PEST, SWOT, and competitive analyses. Coke focuses on consumer demand and being a responsible corporate citizen. It has a diverse product portfolio and seeks to maximize shareholder returns through strategies like brand building, expanding distribution, and sales promotions.
Wac
The document is a case analysis report for Big Boom Beverages regarding their caffeinated alcoholic beverage "Totaled". It summarizes that BBB is facing potential regulatory action from the FDA due to health issues linked to underage binge drinking of Totaled. The report evaluates alternatives for BBB, concluding they should acknowledge mistakes, educate consumers, and work with the FDA to address issues rather than ignore warnings. Implementing robust awareness campaigns on platforms like Facebook and working with retailers is recommended to improve compliance with responsible drinking guidelines. A contingency plan is also advised in case the situation worsens.
Launch of New coke
This case study examines Coca-Cola's launch of New Coke in 1985. Due to declining market share against Pepsi in the 1970s and 1980s, Coca-Cola reformulated its 99-year old formula. Market research showed dissatisfaction with the new formula, but it was launched as New Coke anyway. New Coke was heavily promoted but failed to meet consumer expectations, tasting too similar to Pepsi. It was perceived as a "me-too" product and replaced by Coca-Cola Classic in July 1985. The rapid failure of New Coke and success of the return to Coca-Cola Classic has led some to believe the launch was deliberately engineered to boost sales of the original formula.
Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India
This case study examines Coke and Pepsi's entry and competition in the Indian market. It discusses the political environment in India, the timing of each company's entry, and their growth strategies. Pepsi entered earlier in 1986 while Coke entered later in 1993 after buying local brands from Parle. Both companies localized their products and promotions to the Indian market but Coke made some mistakes by entering at the wrong time and overpromising to the government. In the long run, Pepsi had more market share and a wider regional presence due to more successful advertising. Overall, the case suggests that careful evaluation of political risks and relationships with local governments are important lessons from operating in India.
Mountain Man Brewing Company:Bringing the Brand to Light
The document discusses the history and current state of Mountain Man Lager, an independent brewery founded in 1925 in West Virginia. It was well established by the 1960s but now faces declining sales and changing consumer preferences toward lighter beers. The company generates $50 million annually from its sole brand but revenues were down 2% in 2005. Younger consumers prefer light beers which provide an opportunity. The CEO has to decide whether to stick with the original brand, launch a new light brand, or extend the Mountain Man brand into light beer. Introducing a Mountain Man Light brand leverages existing brand equity and distribution while reaching a new demographic and has the best chance of profitability within two years.
Chateau Margaux Marketing Plan
Chateau Margaux produces prestigious wines regarded for their quality, heritage, and brand equity. It is looking to launch a third wine, L'Elegante Margaux, to target new customer segments. The strategy is to position L'Elegante Margaux as offering the best value while avoiding cannibalizing existing wines. It will be priced at €120 per bottle and distributed off-premise through specialized merchants and e-commerce to attract connoisseurs and enthusiasts without competing directly with the flagship wines. Key metrics like sales, awareness, and profitability will be monitored to evaluate the strategy's success in growing the brand and business.
What's hot (20)
Case Study Analysis on Mountain Man Brewing Company : Bringing the Brand to ...
Case Study Analysis on Mountain Man Brewing Company : Bringing the Brand to ...
Cola war continues: Coke and Pepsi 21st century and battle for Internationa...
Cola war continues: Coke and Pepsi 21st century and battle for Internationa...
cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
Mountain Man Brewing Company:Bringing the Brand to Light
Mountain Man Brewing Company:Bringing the Brand to Light
Viewers also liked
BCG matrix with example
The document discusses the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix, which classifies business units into four categories based on their relative market share and market growth rate: Question Marks, Stars, Cash Cows, and Dogs. Question Marks have high growth but low market share, requiring high investment. Stars have high growth and market share but also require heavy investment. Cash Cows have low growth but high market share, generating cash with little investment. Dogs have low growth and market share and are cash traps. The BCG Matrix helps assess a product portfolio, cash demands, resource allocation, and divestment decisions.
Sse Cola Wars Group8
The document discusses Porter's five forces analysis of the concentrate industry occupied by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. It finds the industry has high rivalry between the two major competitors and barriers to entry. There are many potential substitute products and buyer power is high due to various retail channels. Regulations differ between countries, affecting business operations on a global scale.
Cola wars
Cola Wars!!
Stage 1 (1950-1970) saw Pepsi target African Americans and younger consumers while Coke focused overseas. Pepsi doubled US consumers while Coke assumed saturation.
Stage 2 (1970-1990) saw both diversify into food while their market shares fluctuated between 30-40%. They imitated each other's ads and perceived brand differences.
Stage 3 (1990-2006) challenges included flat demand, obesity links to CSDs, and bottlers' profit pressures. Both shifted to non-CSD drinks and smaller packaging. Coke relied more on international markets while Pepsi was more aggressive in the US non-CSD market.
Case Analysis Coke Pepsi2
The document analyzes the soft drink industry using Porter's Five Forces model. It finds the industry is very profitable due to its oligopolistic structure with high barriers to entry. Concentrate producers (CPs) earn higher profits than bottlers. This is because CPs have more added value from their branded products and strategic capabilities, while bottlers have less value from operational effectiveness alone. Contracts between CPs and bottlers strategically favor the CPs through territorial exclusivity and pricing flexibility. The document concludes CPs should not vertically integrate into bottling given their current high profitability in concentrates versus bottlers' declining profits.
Cola Wars - Coke Vs Pepsi Harvard Business School Case Study
A brief presentation on case study Cola Wars where we try to analyse the past history and predict the future of their business and growth opportunities from a Marketing Management Perspective.
Sse Cola Wars Group 2
The document discusses the ongoing competition between Coca Cola and Pepsi in the concentrate and bottling industries, noting that their rivalry has led to increased profitability for both companies but also makes it difficult for new competitors to enter the market. It analyzes factors affecting industry profits such as demand, substitutes, competition, and political issues like potential taxes on soda that could impact the companies.
Ssecolawarsgroup5b2011 110121071443-phpapp01
This document analyzes the cola industry using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the industry has high barriers to entry due to economies of scale, customer switching costs, and unequal access to distribution. Rivalry is high as the industry is dominated by two major competitors. Threats of substitution are currently low but may increase with greater health concerns. The analysis also finds that bottling operations have lower profitability than concentrate companies due to squeezed margins between suppliers and retailers. Key challenges for cola companies include health trends, substitutes, retailer power, and a mature market. Competition has lowered margins but also increased the power of major players like Coke and Pepsi.
Ancoff matrix
Coca-Cola has successfully expanded its product line and entered new markets through various growth strategies outlined in the Ansoff Matrix. Some examples include developing the Diet Coke brand to cater to growing health trends in the 1980s, launching new flavors like Coca-Cola Vanilla and Fanta Icy Lemon after market research and taste tests, and introducing smaller bottle sizes and children's drinks like Winnie the Pooh Roo Juice to target new demographic segments. Coca-Cola also developed the Powerade energy drink to enter the growing sports drink market after extensively researching competitors.
Cola Wars The Final One
The document discusses the cola wars between Coke and Pepsi in the 1990s. It analyzes the soft drink industry structure and competitive environment using Porter's Five Forces model. Coke and Pepsi have established a duopoly in the industry, with high barriers to entry. Their rivalry has intensified as they compete for market share globally through advertising, new products, and targeting each other's territories. While margins may decrease due to competition, both companies have pursued growth in international markets to maintain profits.
SSE ColaWars Group5
This document discusses the Coca Cola concentrate and bottling businesses using Porter's Five Forces analysis. It finds that the concentrate business has high barriers to entry due to costly R&D and manufacturing. Competition is intense between Coca Cola and Pepsi who dominate the duopoly market. For bottlers, barriers to entry are also high due to capital requirements and exclusive territories. Competition is more limited for bottlers linked to concentrate producers. Overall, both the concentrate producers and bottlers are profitable but to different extents, with concentrate producers adding more value through branding and recipes.
Cola wars
The cola wars between Coke and Pepsi continued into the 21st century with both companies facing new challenges. While CSD consumption had grown steadily in the US from 1970 to 2000, growth slowed in the 2000s. Both companies relied on brand extensions like Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi to boost sales. By 2004, Pepsi had gained market share over Coke, but both remained the top two brands. To sustain profits, Coke and Pepsi expanded their product portfolios beyond carbonated soft drinks into non-carbonated beverages, bottled water and juices.
Sse Cola Wars Group6
This document analyzes the competitive forces in the concentrate and bottling businesses of the cola industry using Porter's Five Forces framework. For the concentrate business, rivalry is fierce, buyers are price sensitive, and substitutes like health drinks pose a growing threat. In bottling, capital requirements are high, suppliers of cans have significant influence, and substitutes like soda streams present opportunities. Overall, while profit remains, health and environmental concerns will be key for future success in the industry.
Comparative Analysis Coca Cola vs Pepsi
This document provides information about Coca-Cola and Pepsi in India, including their histories, products, marketing strategies, and competition. Coca-Cola entered the Indian market in 1970 but exited in 1977, re-entering in 1993. Pepsi entered India in 1985. Both companies have expanded their product portfolios beyond carbonated drinks to include juices, coffee, water, and snacks. Coca-Cola and Pepsi employ similar marketing strategies utilizing celebrity endorsements and focusing on youth, but Coca-Cola has a longer history and more established brand in India.
Pepsi v Coke Case Study
The document discusses the "Cola Wars" between Coca-Cola and Pepsi for dominance of the soda market. It provides statistics on each company's market share and spending on marketing/advertising from 2002-2009. Pepsi spends billions each year but trails Coke in overall market share. The document also discusses the practice of "ambush marketing" and potential issues around Coke promoting at NFL games. It presents options for both companies to consider regarding advertising around major sporting events.
Merchandise Strategies: Macy's Case Study
This case study examines Macy's current merchandising strategies and initiatives, their top competitors and suggested actionable points to increase their share of wallet of the Millennial target market.
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
The document discusses the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi from 1970 to 2010. It describes how consumption of carbonated soft drinks grew steadily at 3% annually from 1970 to 2000 due to increasing availability, new diet and flavored varieties, and declining prices. While Coca-Cola and Pepsi dominated the cola segment, their market share has declined in recent years as consumers have shifted to healthier beverage alternatives like water, juice, and sports drinks. Both companies have adapted by expanding their product portfolios internationally and acquiring companies in the snack and beverage industries to sustain profits in the face of flattening carbonated soft drink demand.
Coke & pepsi in india presentation
This document provides an overview of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo's entry into the Indian market in the 1990s. It discusses their industry backgrounds, key issues in entering India, advertising campaigns, SWOT and PEST analyses, Porter's five forces analysis, recommendations to increase sales, potential risks and their mitigation. The recommendations include increasing infrastructure, tying up with restaurants, focusing on both youth and older generations through promotional activities and traditional advertising. Thorough local market research and moving into the health drinks sector are proposed as next steps. Risks around issues like loss of originality and high costs are also addressed.
KFC Matrixes Analysis
KFC has evolved since 1939 when Colonel Sanders developed the original recipe. It grew into a national chain between 1952 and 1997, changing ownership several times. KFC introduced a zero trans fat recipe in 2007. In Pakistan, KFC aims to satisfy customers and put a smile on their faces. Its goals include excellence and growth. KFC offers various chicken products and has strengths in brand, global experience, and recipes, but weaknesses in price, image, and quality issues in some outlets. It sees opportunities in new markets and trends but faces threats from competition and health concerns. Recommendations include new healthier recipes, cheaper items, and improving services and healthy image.
HUL : Hindustan Unilever Limited
HUL : Hindustan Unilever Limited
Mission & Vision
History
BCG Matrix, Porter’s 5 forces,
SWOT Analysis
Presentation By:
Amara Bandukada
Umme Baba
Arul Collins
Anand Sawji
Ayush Parekh
Viewers also liked (20)
Cola Wars - Coke Vs Pepsi Harvard Business School Case Study
Cola Wars - Coke Vs Pepsi Harvard Business School Case Study
Similar to Cola Wars
Coca-Cola in China
This document presents a marketing strategy for Coca-Cola in China. It outlines Coca-Cola's mission statement, objectives, consumer segments, and analyses including PESTLE, Porter's Five Forces, BCG matrix, and critical success factors. The strategy focuses on increasing sales and market share in China through local manufacturing and a new product targeting a new consumer segment. Key factors for success include brand affinity, taste, price, health awareness, and promotions.
Statistical Analysis.
The document provides an overview of the Coca-Cola Company including its history, products, mission statement, industry life cycle analysis, product life cycle, market map, PESTLE analysis, SWOT analysis, and Porter's Five Forces analysis. It discusses how Coca-Cola was founded in 1886 and is now a multinational beverage company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia that produces and sells various beverage products around the world.
Cola wars
Our major goal is to help you achieve your academic goals. We are commited to helping you get top grades in your academic papers.We desire to help you come up with great essays that meet your lecturer's expectations.Contact us now at http://www.premiumessays.net/
An industry analysis by Porters Five Forces reveals that the soft dr.pdf
An industry analysis by Porters Five Forces reveals that the soft drink industry has historically
been favorable for positive profitability, as exemplified by Pepsi and Cokes financial outcomes.
Soft drink industry is very profitable, more so for the concentrate producers than the bottler\'s.
This is surprising considering the fact that product sold is a commodity which can even be
produced easily. There are several reasons for this, using the five forces analysis we can clearly
demonstrate how each force contributes the profitability of the industry.
Threat of new entrants
Entering bottling, meanwhile, would require substantial capital investment, which would deter
entry.
although the CP industry is not very capital intensive, other barriers would prevent entry.
Through their DSD practices, these companies had intimate relationships with their retail
channels and would be able to defend their positions effectively through discounting or other
tactics.
It would be nearly impossible for either a new CP or a new bottler to enter the industry. New CPs
would need to overcome the tremendous marketing muscle and market presence of Coke, Pepsi,
and a few others, who had established brand names that were as much as a century old.
Companies that have a door to door distribution channel in place like snack companies could
choose to diversify into soda industry
Switching costs are low for consumers who risk very little by trying new brands or
Beverages
Barriers to entry are relatively high, though, with large advertising budgets and competitive
brand loyalty to big players like Coca-Cola and Pepsi
The drinks with high growth and high hype are non-carbonated beverages such as juice drinks,
sports drinks, tea-based drinks, dairy-based drinks, and especially bottled water
Bargaining power of buyers
through five principal channels: food stores, convenience and gas, fountain, vending, and mass
merchandisers (primary part of \"Other\" in \"Cola Wars…\" case)
Bottlers own a manufacturing and sales operation in an exclusive geographic territory, with
rights granted in perpetuity by the franchiser, subject to termination only in the event of default
by the bottler
1980 Soft Drink Interbrand Competition Act preserved the right of CPs to grant exclusive
territories to their bottlers, giving less bargaining power to Bottler\'s buyers because there is no
alternative supplier
Bottlers are locked into contracts that grant CPs the right to set prices and other terms of sale
Bottlers are allowed to handle the non-cola brands of other Cps at their discretion
Bottlers are also given freedom in choosing whether or not to carry new beverages introduced by
the CPs but cannot carry directly competitive brands
Competition for brand shelf space in retail channels gives some bargaining power back to buyers
Threat of substitute products
Through the early 1960s, soft drinks were synonymous with \"colas\" in the mind of consumers.
In the 1980s and 1990s Coffee, tea, water, juices.
Coca cola company
Coca Cola Company was first invented in 1886 in Atlanta, Georgia. It is now the world's largest soft-drink company selling 1.7 billion servings everyday. Its mission is to refresh the world and create value. It has a 2020 vision to double revenues. As the largest publicly traded company, it faces issues like health concerns contributing to obesity and shifting tastes. Its resources include brand loyalty, distribution networks and financial position. It faces high competition from Pepsi and must adapt to changing consumer and industry trends.
IntroductionTeam 9 Consulting will be working with Coca-Cola t.docx
Introduction
Team 9 Consulting will be working with Coca-Cola to develop an analysis of their marketing strategies. We’ll discuss various facets of the industry and the company and provide a recommendation for their marketing department.
The specific product line that we will be focusing on in our marketing plan is on the Coca-Cola brand drink itself, or Classic Coke. Coca-Cola does have many varieties of Coke, such as Coca-Cola Life, Diet Coke, and Coke Zero that will be touched on throughout this report as well.
Market Profile
Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) is the world's largest beverage company with over 500 brands and 3,900 beverage choices (Coca-Cola, 2017). They aim to continue their growth and “refresh the world” by starting within and making the company a better, more sustainable one. Their main competitors in the beverage industry are Pepsi and Dr Pepper Snapple Inc. (Reference.com, 2017)
Coca-Cola has strong values that guide their business philosophy: Coke supports ideas such as family, togetherness, happiness, and community. This is strongly reflected in their company vision statements.
Mission Statement (Coca-Cola, 2017):
Our Roadmap starts with our mission, which is enduring. It declares our purpose as a company and serves as the standard against which we weigh our actions and decisions.
· To refresh the world...
· To inspire moments of optimism and happiness...
· To create value and make a difference.
Coca-Cola mainly manufactures and sells Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs). As of December 2016 Coca-Cola led the CSD sector with a market share of 40.7% which resulted in approximate sales of $18,630.8 million (Mintel, 2017).
The CSD market is a multi-billion dollar industry seeing approximately $36 billion dollars in revenues each year (Stivaros, 2016). The industry has been in decline in recent years, with CSD sales forecasted to continue falling. The graphic below (Mintel, 2017) illustrates this decline.
Growth Strategy
Coca-Cola has two main growth strategies: strategic initiatives and product development.
Strategic initiatives:
James Quincey, President and COO of Coca Cola, has spoken recently about Coca-Cola’s growth strategy (Bailey, 2016), which is based on the following five initiatives to restore momentum and transform the business: focus on productivity, streamline organization, make disciplined investments, adapt a segmented approach to driving revenue, and focus on its core business model.
Coca-Cola’s business approach of segmenting its operations, such as outsourcing all of their bottling to partners (Coca-Cola, 2017), helps them keep costs low and increase their overall profits.
Product Development:
During a conference call during their 3rd Quarter in 2016 (Bailey, 2016) their Chief Operating Officer noted the following strategies:
· Expanding their sugar free range of sodas
· Working on reformulating existing products to contain less sugar
· Packing their soda in smaller containers
· Expanding their range.
Ppt on coca cola
Coca-Cola is the largest bottler of its own branded beverages globally in terms of sales volume. It has a strong brand portfolio including carbonated drinks, water, juices, energy drinks, coffee, and beer. Its mission is to refresh the world and inspire optimism. It is moving from creative to content excellence. A PESTEL analysis shows that Coca-Cola is influenced by various political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal factors in different countries. Porter's five forces analysis indicates threats from substitutes and powerful customers, but low threat of new entry and competitive rivalry between the major players. Coca-Cola aims to focus on customer value, implement segmentation strategies, drive innovation, and achieve operational
Group
Coca-Cola is pursuing a low-cost, high-volume strategy to boost sales of its flagship Coke brand in India. It has lowered the price of Coke concentrate for bottlers and the price of 200ml Coke bottles to Rs. 8, while keeping prices of other brands like Thums Up and Sprite the same. This makes Coke bottling unprofitable but is aimed at increasing Coke's volumes in India. Coca-Cola's global headquarters focuses on the performance of the Coke brand specifically, so growing Coke volumes is important to how Coca-Cola is perceived globally despite the strategy compromising bottlers' profits locally.
a-ppt-on-coca-cola
Coca-Cola is the largest bottler of its own beverages globally. It has a wide portfolio of drinks including carbonated soft drinks, water, juices, teas and coffee. Its mission is to refresh people and inspire happiness. The presentation analyzes Coca-Cola's strategic management using PESTEL and Porter's Five Forces frameworks. It discusses Coca-Cola's focus on customer value, market segmentation strategies, product innovation, and operational efficiencies to drive growth. In India, Coca-Cola is using a low-cost, high-volume strategy to increase market share of its flagship Coke brand, even if it reduces bottling business profits.
Cola wars continue coke and pepsi in 2006-1
The document discusses the ongoing competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi in the carbonated soft drink industry. It provides background on the industry structure, noting that Coke and Pepsi dominate as concentrate producers while bottling operations are carried out by other companies. The intense rivalry between Coke and Pepsi has driven up advertising spending and innovation, strengthening their brands while weakening smaller competitors. Despite declining demand for sugary drinks, Coke and Pepsi may be able to sustain profits by diversifying their product lines and marketing to address health consciousness.
Coke | Coca-Cola | Varun Daahal
The Presentation is about :
- Coca Cola Comapny
- Internal & External factors analysis
- Strategic decision matrix
- Coca Cola's Strategy
This Presentation done as a part of MBA class assessment in 2010
Cola Wars
This document analyzes the competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi using various frameworks including Porter's Five Forces, PEST analysis, and the resource-based view. It finds that Coca-Cola and Pepsi dominate the soft drink oligopoly through brand loyalty and large marketing budgets that create barriers to entry. While demand is slowing domestically, growth opportunities exist in international markets like China. Both companies operate in fast economic times and imitate each other's strategies, though their secret cola formulas and brand images remain rare and valuable resources.
Coca-Cola’s Marketing Challenges in Brazil: The Tubainas War
Coca-Cola's market share in Brazil was 50% in 2003. While its profits and market share declined in recent years, it maintained strengths such as a large manufacturing and commercial fleet presence. However, it faced challenges from competitors like Ambev and private label brands that captured over 33% of the market. Coca-Cola analyzed its financial performance and implemented strategies like lowering prices and regaining distribution to improve profitability and market share in Brazil, which was a key overseas market. It created an internal factor evaluation matrix to assess strengths and weaknesses as it worked to make its Brazilian subsidiary the largest overseas operation.
Cola wars between Cocacola and Pepsi
The soft drink concentrate business is highly profitable due to low costs of production and barriers to entry. Concentrate producers require only $25-50 million for a plant that can serve the entire US market. They face little threat from new entrants due to patented formulas and brand equity built over decades of marketing. In contrast, bottlers face higher costs, more competition, and lower profits of around 35% due to factors like needing large capital investments for plants. However, Coke and Pepsi have been able to sustain profits through brand loyalty, expanding into new markets like juices, and leveraging their brand equity globally despite slowing carbonated drink demand.
Running head PEPSI VS. COKE CASE STUDY .docx
Running head: PEPSI VS. COKE CASE STUDY 1
PEPSI VS. COKE CASE STUDY 2
Pepsi vs. Coke Case Study
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Pepsi vs. Coke Case Study
Part A
The Worldwide Socioeconomic and Political Environment
Understanding the external environment in which a company operates is crucial for any top management. For instance, the global socio economic and political environment presents many challenges and opportunities for many companies (Wetherly, & Otter, 2014). The demographic and culture of the worldwide market varies. For this reason, the importance of determining what to sell, where, how much, and how to market is increasing. For example, the worldwide market is currently more focused on healthy products. Therefore, companies have to respond to these needs in all aspects. In addition, it has also been noted that social responsibility of a company affects the worldwide image of a brand. The global economic challenges might also affect the liquidity and financial performance of companies, for instance, soft drink and beverage manufacturers such as Coca-Cola Co. and Pepsi Co. In addition, the price of imports, exports, and exchange rates might also affect many industries such as soft drink manufacturers (Wetherly, & Otter, 2014). Finally, the economic environment affects how consumers spending powers, thereby, having an impact in many sectors of the economy. It is also important to note that global political environment presents various risk to many companies. For instance, political instabilities in some parts of the globe and changes in established laws and regulations might prevent companies such as Coca Cola and Pepsi from distributing drinks.
The Domestic Environment
The domestic environment in which Coca Cola Co. and operates presents many challenges and opportunities at the same time. For instance, the strong democratic setup in the US and effective rule of law is considered fair and transparent by most companies. However, the US is also under continuous threat because of the interventionist policies regarding war on terror. In addition, the domestic environment of Pepsi and Coca Cola companies has a well-developed economic system that is supported by many service and manufacturing companies. Like some developed countries, the US is faced with the problem of the aging population. This can contribute to major labor shortage more so for companies operating in the US market. However, with a superior education system, the US has one of most highly trained and skilled employees (Wetherly, & Otter, 2014). However, rising racial bigotry is not only a concern for the government but also for major corporations such as Coca Cola and Pepsi that rely on political stability to sell products. Finally, innovation and technology are considered by m ...
SUSL - Coca cola presentation
This document provides an analysis of Coca-Cola's marketing strategy. It begins with an introduction of the Coca-Cola company and its mission statement. It then discusses the current business environment and Coca-Cola's current marketing strategy, which involves the 4 P's of marketing. It analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of Coca-Cola's current strategy and discusses the company's segmentation, targeting, positioning, and developing of its marketing mix. The document is authored by group A for their marketing management course.
Marketing plan of coke
The document presents a marketing plan for Coca-Cola, outlining the company's history, mission, vision, and goals to double revenues by 2020 while promoting sustainability and connecting with the global middle class. It analyzes Coca-Cola's strong market position worldwide and in key countries like India and Pakistan, as well as competitors and strategies around product, price, place, and promotion. SWOT and financial details are also provided.
Coca cola strategic management
This document provides an overview and analysis of Coca-Cola. It discusses the company's history beginning in 1886, products, vision, mission, objectives, PEST analysis, Porter's 5 forces, SWOT analysis, corporate strategy, business strategy, life cycle, and BCG matrix. Recommendations are made to focus on product differentiation, avoid negative health effects, expand into non-carbonated drinks and snacks, pursue vertical integration, and broaden distribution channels.
Assignment on 4ps marketing
The document discusses the marketing mix of Coca-Cola, known as the 4Ps - Product, Price, Place, and Promotion. It provides details on Coca-Cola's various product lines, positioning and branding strategies, packaging considerations, pricing approaches including penetration pricing, and distribution channels. Coca-Cola has effectively utilized the marketing mix over time to build its brand equity and achieve worldwide recognition as the leading soft drink company.
Pricing Strategies by Coca-Cola in India
This document describes the the pricing journey of Coca-Cola India right from its entry till today. Coca-cola competes in a very fiercely competitive market and pricing is one of the most important factors it has to consider while conceptualizing its strategies.
Similar to Cola Wars (20)
An industry analysis by Porters Five Forces reveals that the soft dr.pdf
An industry analysis by Porters Five Forces reveals that the soft dr.pdf
IntroductionTeam 9 Consulting will be working with Coca-Cola t.docx
IntroductionTeam 9 Consulting will be working with Coca-Cola t.docx
Coca-Cola’s Marketing Challenges in Brazil: The Tubainas War
Coca-Cola’s Marketing Challenges in Brazil: The Tubainas War
Recently uploaded
The state of welfare Resolution Foundation Event
How has Britain’s safety net changed since 2010 and what comes next?
falcon-invoice-discounting-a-strategic-approach-to-optimize-investments
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.
1.2 Business Ideas Business Ideas Busine
Business Ideas PowerpointBusiness Ideas PowerpointBusiness Ideas PowerpointBusiness Ideas PowerpointBusiness Ideas PowerpointBusiness Ideas PowerpointBusiness Ideas PowerpointBusiness Ideas PowerpointBusiness Ideas PowerpointBusiness Ideas PowerpointBusiness Ideas PowerpointBusiness Ideas PowerpointBusiness Ideas PowerpointBusiness Ideas PowerpointBusiness Ideas Powerpoint
1：1制作加拿大麦吉尔大学毕业证硕士学历证书原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【加拿大麦吉尔大学毕业证硕士学历证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Unlock Your Potential with NCVT MIS.pptx
The NCVT MIS Certificate, issued by the National Council for Vocational Training (NCVT), is a crucial credential for skill development in India. Recognized nationwide, it verifies vocational training across diverse trades, enhancing employment prospects, standardizing training quality, and promoting self-employment. This certification is integral to India's growing labor force, fostering skill development and economic growth.
Fabular Frames and the Four Ratio Problem
Digital, interactive art showing the struggle of a society in providing for its present population while also saving planetary resources for future generations. Spread across several frames, the art is actually the rendering of real and speculative data. The stereographic projections change shape in response to prompts and provocations. Visitors interact with the model through speculative statements about how to increase savings across communities, regions, ecosystems and environments. Their fabulations combined with random noise, i.e. factors beyond control, have a dramatic effect on the societal transition. Things get better. Things get worse. The aim is to give visitors a new grasp and feel of the ongoing struggles in democracies around the world.
Stunning art in the small multiples format brings out the spatiotemporal nature of societal transitions, against backdrop issues such as energy, housing, waste, farmland and forest. In each frame we see hopeful and frightful interplays between spending and saving. Problems emerge when one of the two parts of the existential anaglyph rapidly shrinks like Arctic ice, as factors cross thresholds. Ecological wealth and intergenerational equity areFour at stake. Not enough spending could mean economic stress, social unrest and political conflict. Not enough saving and there will be climate breakdown and ‘bankruptcy’. So where does speculative design start and the gambling and betting end? Behind each fabular frame is a four ratio problem. Each ratio reflects the level of sacrifice and self-restraint a society is willing to accept, against promises of prosperity and freedom. Some values seem to stabilise a frame while others cause collapse. Get the ratios right and we can have it all. Get them wrong and things get more desperate.
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
RMIT硕士学位证成绩单【微信95270640】《皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证书》《QQ微信95270640》学位证书电子版：在线制作皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证成绩单GPA修改（制作RMIT毕业证成绩单RMIT文凭证书样本）、皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证书与成绩单样本图片、《RMIT学历证书学位证书》、皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证案例毕业证书制作軟體、在线制作加拿大硕士学历证书真实可查.
【本科硕士】皇家墨尔本理工大学皇家墨尔本理工大学本科学位证成绩单（GPA修改）；学历认证（教育部认证）；大学Offer录取通知书留信认证使馆认证；雅思语言证书等高仿类证书。
办理流程：
1客户提供办理皇家墨尔本理工大学皇家墨尔本理工大学本科学位证成绩单信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
真实网上可查的证明材料
1教育部学历学位认证留服官网真实存档可查永久存档。
2留学回国人员证明（使馆认证）使馆网站真实存档可查。
我们对海外大学及学院的毕业证成绩单所使用的材料尺寸大小防伪结构（包括：皇家墨尔本理工大学皇家墨尔本理工大学本科学位证成绩单隐形水印阴影底纹钢印LOGO烫金烫银LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕激光镭射紫外荧光温感复印防伪）都有原版本文凭对照。质量得到了广大海外客户群体的认可同时和海外学校留学中介做到与时俱进及时掌握各大院校的（毕业证成绩单资格证结业证录取通知书在读证明等相关材料）的版本更新信息能够在第一时间掌握最新的海外学历文凭的样版尺寸大小纸张材质防伪技术等等并在第一时间收集到原版实物以求达到客户的需求。
本公司还可以按照客户原版印刷制作且能够达到客户理想的要求。有需要办理证件的客户请联系我们在线客服中心微信：95270640 或咨询在线父亲的家很狭小除了一张单人床和一张小方桌几乎没有多余的空间山娃一下子就联想起学校的男小便处山娃很想笑却怎么也笑不出来山娃很迷惑父亲的家除了一扇小铁门连窗户也没有墓穴一般阴森森有些骇人父亲的城也便成了山娃的城父亲的家也便成了山娃的家父亲让山娃呆在屋里做作业看电视最多只能在门口透透气不能跟陌生人搭腔更不能乱跑一怕迷路二怕拐子拐人山娃很惊惧去年村里的田鸡就因为跟父亲进城一不小心被人拐跑了至今不见踪影害不
Using Online job postings and survey data to understand labour market trends
Using Online job postings and survey data to understand labour market trendsLabour Market Information Council | Conseil de l’information sur le marché du travail
[4:55 p.m.] Bryan Oates
OJPs are becoming a critical resource for policy-makers and researchers who study the labour market. LMIC continues to work with Vicinity Jobs’ data on OJPs, which can be explored in our Canadian Job Trends Dashboard. Valuable insights have been gained through our analysis of OJP data, including LMIC research lead
Suzanne Spiteri’s recent report on improving the quality and accessibility of job postings to reduce employment barriers for neurodivergent people.
Decoding job postings: Improving accessibility for neurodivergent job seekers
Improving the quality and accessibility of job postings is one way to reduce employment barriers for neurodivergent people.International Sustainability Standards Board
Issb standards
New standard for reporting sustainability on lines of tcfd
What's a worker’s market? Job quality and labour market tightness
What's a worker’s market? Job quality and labour market tightnessLabour Market Information Council | Conseil de l’information sur le marché du travail
In a tight labour market, job-seekers gain bargaining power and leverage it into greater job quality—at least, that’s the conventional wisdom.
Michael, LMIC Economist, presented findings that reveal a weakened relationship between labour market tightness and job quality indicators following the pandemic. Labour market tightness coincided with growth in real wages for only a portion of workers: those in low-wage jobs requiring little education. Several factors—including labour market composition, worker and employer behaviour, and labour market practices—have contributed to the absence of worker benefits. These will be investigated further in future work.Who Is Abhay Bhutada, MD of Poonawalla Fincorp
Abhay Bhutada, the Managing Director of Poonawalla Fincorp Limited, is an accomplished leader with over 15 years of experience in commercial and retail lending. A Qualified Chartered Accountant, he has been pivotal in leveraging technology to enhance financial services. Starting his career at Bank of India, he later founded TAB Capital Limited and co-founded Poonawalla Finance Private Limited, emphasizing digital lending. Under his leadership, Poonawalla Fincorp achieved a 'AAA' credit rating, integrating acquisitions and emphasizing corporate governance. Actively involved in industry forums and CSR initiatives, Abhay has been recognized with awards like "Young Entrepreneur of India 2017" and "40 under 40 Most Influential Leader for 2020-21." Personally, he values mindfulness, enjoys gardening, yoga, and sees every day as an opportunity for growth and improvement.
在线办理(TAMU毕业证书)美国德州农工大学毕业证PDF成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(TAMU毕业证书)美国德州农工大学毕业证PDF成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
falcon-invoice-discounting-a-premier-investment-platform-for-superior-returns...
falcon-invoice-discounting-a-premier-investment-platform-for-superior-returns...Falcon Invoice Discounting
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.在线办理(UMASS毕业证书)马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校毕业证完成信一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(UMASS毕业证书)马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Bridging the gap: Online job postings, survey data and the assessment of job ...
Bridging the gap: Online job postings, survey data and the assessment of job ...Labour Market Information Council | Conseil de l’information sur le marché du travail
OJP data from firms like Vicinity Jobs have emerged as a complement to traditional sources of labour demand data, such as the Job Vacancy and Wages Survey (JVWS). Ibrahim Abuallail, PhD Candidate, University of Ottawa, presented research relating to bias in OJPs and a proposed approach to effectively adjust OJP data to complement existing official data (such as from the JVWS) and improve the measurement of labour demand.快速办理(SMU毕业证书)南卫理公会大学毕业证毕业完成信一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SMU毕业证书)南卫理公会大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Discover the Future of Dogecoin with Our Comprehensive Guidance
Learn in-depth about Dogecoin's trajectory and stay informed with 36crypto's essential and up-to-date information about the crypto space.
Our presentation delves into Dogecoin's potential future, exploring whether it's destined to skyrocket to the moon or face a downward spiral. In addition, it highlights invaluable insights. Don't miss out on this opportunity to enhance your crypto understanding!
https://36crypto.com/the-future-of-dogecoin-how-high-can-this-cryptocurrency-reach/
1比1复刻(ksu毕业证书)美国堪萨斯州立大学毕业证本科文凭证书原版一模一样
原版定制【微信:bwp0011】《(ksu毕业证书)美国堪萨斯州立大学毕业证本科文凭证书》【微信:bwp0011】成绩单 、雅思、外壳、留信学历认证永久存档查询，采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信bwp0011】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信bwp0011】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
Recently uploaded (20)
falcon-invoice-discounting-a-strategic-approach-to-optimize-investments
falcon-invoice-discounting-a-strategic-approach-to-optimize-investments
Using Online job postings and survey data to understand labour market trends
Using Online job postings and survey data to understand labour market trends
What's a worker’s market? Job quality and labour market tightness
What's a worker’s market? Job quality and labour market tightness
falcon-invoice-discounting-a-premier-investment-platform-for-superior-returns...
falcon-invoice-discounting-a-premier-investment-platform-for-superior-returns...
Bridging the gap: Online job postings, survey data and the assessment of job ...
Bridging the gap: Online job postings, survey data and the assessment of job ...
Applying the Global Internal Audit Standards_AIS.pdf
Applying the Global Internal Audit Standards_AIS.pdf
Discover the Future of Dogecoin with Our Comprehensive Guidance
Discover the Future of Dogecoin with Our Comprehensive Guidance
Cola Wars
- 2. Cola Wars continues…. Presented by: Group “5” Vs
- 3. Group members Usman Ehsan 05108030 Shams-ur-rehman 05108033 Naveed Siddique 05108081 Sumra Anwar 05108116
- 24. Legal issues
- 30. Not good succession planning