Chapter 8 discusses converter transfer functions and Bode plots. It reviews common transfer function elements like poles, zeros and their impact on Bode plots. Specific topics covered include the single pole response, single zero response, right half-plane zeros, and combinations of elements. It also discusses how to analyze converter transfer functions, construct them graphically, and measure real converter transfer functions and impedances. The chapter aims to provide engineers with the tools needed to model, analyze and design power converters.
IC Design of Power Management Circuits (IV)Claudia Sin
by Wing-Hung Ki
Integrated Power Electronics Laboratory
ECE Dept., HKUST
Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong
www.ee.ust.hk/~eeki
International Symposium on Integrated Circuits
Singapore, Dec. 14, 2009
Two port network parameters, Z, Y, ABCD, h and g parameters, Characteristic impedance,
Image transfer constant, image and iterative impedance, network function, driving point and
transfer functions – using transformed (S) variables, Poles and Zeros.
Part of Lecture series on EE321N, Power Electronics-I delivered by me during Fifth Semester of B.Tech. Electrical Engg., 2012
Z H College of Engg. & Technology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh
Please comment and feel free to ask anything related. Thanks!
Conversion of transfer function to canonical state variable modelsJyoti Singh
Realization of transfer function into state variable models is needed even if the control system design based on frequency-domain design method.
In these cases the need arises for the purpose of transient response simulation.
But there is not much software for the numerical inversion of Laplace transform.
So one ways is to convert transfer function of the system to state variable description and numerically integrating the resulting differential equations rather than attempting to compute the inverse Laplace transform by numerical method.
IC Design of Power Management Circuits (IV)Claudia Sin
by Wing-Hung Ki
Integrated Power Electronics Laboratory
ECE Dept., HKUST
Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong
www.ee.ust.hk/~eeki
International Symposium on Integrated Circuits
Singapore, Dec. 14, 2009
Two port network parameters, Z, Y, ABCD, h and g parameters, Characteristic impedance,
Image transfer constant, image and iterative impedance, network function, driving point and
transfer functions – using transformed (S) variables, Poles and Zeros.
Part of Lecture series on EE321N, Power Electronics-I delivered by me during Fifth Semester of B.Tech. Electrical Engg., 2012
Z H College of Engg. & Technology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh
Please comment and feel free to ask anything related. Thanks!
Conversion of transfer function to canonical state variable modelsJyoti Singh
Realization of transfer function into state variable models is needed even if the control system design based on frequency-domain design method.
In these cases the need arises for the purpose of transient response simulation.
But there is not much software for the numerical inversion of Laplace transform.
So one ways is to convert transfer function of the system to state variable description and numerically integrating the resulting differential equations rather than attempting to compute the inverse Laplace transform by numerical method.
Small Signal Modelling and Controller Design of Boost Converter using MATLABPremier Publishers
Designing a controller for pulse width modulation (PWM) power converters is a real challenge owing to nonlinear and time-variant nature of switching power converters. PID con- trollers based on classical control theory is the simplest controller design approach. Nevertheless, the approach is valid only for linear system and hence the converter has to be linearized. The trial and error method of tuning the controller parameters may not give satisfactory results for advanced converters. Hence a systematic software aided controller design is required. This paper presents a systematic approach for controller design of a dc-dc converter using MATLAB. A simple converter like boost converter is taken as an example to illustrate the approach. Small signal modeling of a boost converter is derived theoretically. This is compared with MATLAB generated small signal model and resultant converter transfer functions. The controller design of the linearised converter is done using MATLAB. Finally, the performance of the controller is verified for line and load variations.
Ece 523 project – fully differential two stage telescopic op ampKarthik Rathinavel
• Designed a two stage op-amp with first stage as a telescopic amplifier and second stage being a common source, in Cadence.
• Simulated the loop characteristics of the amplifier to have atleast 100 MHz Unity Gain Bandwidth, 65 dB gain and 60º phase margin (both differential loop and Common Mode) for three temperature (27,-40,100) corners.
• Extracted the layout of the design in Virtuoso (after passing DRC an LVS) and simulated the differential loop performances of the extracted netlist.
• Designed a third order Butterworth filter with 100 KHz corner frequency using the op-amp.
This paper addresses a novel approach for designing and modeling of the isolated
flyback converter. Modeling is done without parasitic as well as with parasitic components.
A detailed analysis, simulation and different control strategy are conferred for flyback
converter in continuous conduction mode (CCM). To verify the design and modeling at
primary stage, study of the converter is practiced in CCM operation for input AC voltage
230V at 50Hz and output DC voltage of 5V and 50W output power rating using PSIM 6.0
software. Simulation result shows a little ripple in output of the converter in open loop. Finally
in order to evaluate the system as well as response of the controller, flyback converter is
simulated using MATLAB. This work, highlighting the modeling when the system have
transformer and facilitate designers to go for it when they need one or more than one output
for a given application upto 150W
A Low Cost Single-Switch Bridgeless Boost PFC ConverterIJPEDS-IAES
This paper proposes the single-switch bridgeless boost power factor correction (PFC) converter to achieve high efficiency in low cost. The proposed converter utilizes only one active switching device forPFC operation as well as expecting higher efficiency than typical boost PFC converters. On the other hand, the implementation cost is less than traditional bridgeless boost PFC converters, in where two active switching deivces are necessary. The operational principle, the modeling, and the control scheme of the proposed converter arediscussed in detail. In order to verify the operation of the proposed converter, a 500W switching model is built in PSIM software package. The simulation results show that the proposed converter perfectly achieves PFC operation with only a single active switch.
Continuous Low Pass Filter Realization using Cascaded stages of Tow-Thomas Bi...Karthik Rathinavel
Designed a Continuous Low Pass Filter using three stages of cascaded Tow-Thomas Bi-quads which met the following specifications:-
Pass band: DC to fp = 20 kHz, gain between 0 dB & 1 dB.
Stop band: f > fs = 40 kHz, gain below -50 dB
Found the transfer function, poles and zeros of the required filter using MATLAB. Used Cadence to plot the frequency response of the gain of the overall transfer function using ideal op-amps and non-ideal op-amps.Used dynamic optimization and dynamic range scaling of the elements (resistors and capacitors) such that the output of each stage had a good output swing.
This manuscript deals with the simulation of AC - DC Zeta converter for high power drive application with greater efficiency, lesser losses and power factor correction. It involves simpler control circuitry with less external components. The explanation of Fundamental function of Zeta converter is given in this paper. To condense the harmonic content the PI, PID and Fuzzy Logic controller are used. The operation of Zeta converter in open loop, closed loop is obtained. Closed loop system of zeta converter proves better performance over open loop system. Open and closed loop circuits are simulated by using MATLAB simulink. By giving disturbance in closed loop and open loop systems, feat of Zeta converter is compared.
Design and Simulation of Novel 11-level Inverter Scheme with Reduced Switches IJECEIAES
This work recommends the performance of coupled inductor based novel 11-level inverter with reduced number of switches. The inverter which engender the sinusoidal output voltage by the use of split inductor with minimised total harmonic distortion (THD). The voltage stress on each controlled switching devices, capacitor balancing and switching losses can be reduced. The proposed system which gives better controlled output current and improved output voltage with moderate THD value. The switching devices of the system are controlled by using multicarrier sinusoidal pulse width modulation algorithm by comparing the carrier signals with sinusoidal signal. The simulation and experimental results of the proposed 11-level inverter system outputs are established using matlab/Simulink and dsPIC microcontroller respectively.
Assignment 1 Description Marks out of Wtg() Due date .docxfredharris32
Assignment 1
Description Marks out of Wtg(%) Due date
Assignment 1 200 20 28 August 2015
Part A: Comparators and Switching (5%)
(1) Signal limit detector
Use a 339 comparator, a single 74LS02 quad NOR gate and a +5V power supply only to
design a circuit which will detect when a voltage goes outside the range +2.5V to +3.5V
and such that an LED lights and stays lit. Provide a manual reset to extinguish the LED.
Design hints
1. The circuit has an analog input and a digital output so some form of comparator circuit
is required. There are two thresholds so two comparators are required, with the analog
input applied to both. This arrangement is sometimes known as a window detector.
2. Arrange the output of the comparators to be +5V logic levels, and combine the two
outputs logically to produce one signal which is for example, high for out-of-range, and
low for within-range.
3. Latch the change from in-range to out-of-range.
Design procedure
1. Start at the output and work backwards.
2. Select a latch circuit (flip-flop) and determine what combinations of inputs are needed to
latch and then reset it, ensuring that the LED is connected correctly with regard to both
logic and current flow.
3. Determine the logic needed to combine two comparator outputs in such a way as to
correctly operate the latch.
4. Choose comparator outputs which will correctly drive the logic. Remember that the
reference voltage at the input of the comparator may be at either the + or – input.
5. Choose resistors to provide the correct reference voltages.
Note: You will need to consult data for both the 74LS02 and the 339 (see data sheets).
Test
It is strongly recommended that you assemble and test your circuit.
(2) MOSFET Switching
Find out information on the operation of, and configuring of, MOSFETs to be used in
switching circuits. In particular note the differences between BJTs and MOSFETs in this
role. Draw up a table to highlight the differences and hence the pros and cons on each
device for particular situations (eg. Switching high-to-low or low-to-high (ie. P or N type),
high or low current switching, low or high voltage switching).
Consider the following BJT switching circuit. Analyse the operation of the circuit to
understand the parameters involved. Choose suitable replacement MOSFETs to be used
ELE2504 – Electronic design and analysis 2
instead of the output switching BJTs in the given circuit. Include any necessary circuit
changes for the new devices to operate so as to maintain the circuit’s required parameters.
Where Vcc = 12V and Relay resistance = 15Ω .
ELE2504 – Electronic design and analysis 3
Part B: Transistor amplifier design (6%)
Design and test a common emitter amplifier using the circuit shown and the selected
specifications.
Specifications
Get your own spec ...
A Novel Nonlinear Control of Boost Converter using CCM Phase PlaneIJECEIAES
Boost converter is one of fundamental DC-DC converters and used to deliver electric power with boosted voltage in many electrical systems. Several control strategies have been applied to control a boost converter delivering a constant output voltage. Generally, boost converter works in two modes; one is called a Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM). Many researches use CCM model in the controller design, but they never ensure that the controller always works in CCM. This paper proposes novel nonlinear controller of boost converter designed using the modification of flow in phase plane. The proposed controller guarantees that the boost converter works only in CCM region. The simulation result confirms that our proposed controller brings the state variables from any initial point to a desired operating point successfully.
Closed Loop Analysis of Bridgeless SEPIC Converter for Drive ApplicationIJPEDS-IAES
In this paper closed loop analysis of Single phase AC-DC Bridgeless Single
Ended Primary Inductance Converter (SEPIC) for Power Factor Correction
(PFC) rectifier is analyzed. In this topology the absence of an input diode
bridge and the due to presence of two semiconductor switches in the current
flowing path during each switching cycle which will results in lesser
conduction losses and improved thermal management compared to the
conventional converters. In this paper the operational principles, Frequency
analysis, and design equations of the proposed converter are described in
detail. Performance of the proposed SEPIC PFC rectifier is carried out using
Matlab Simulink software and results are presented.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
PHP Frameworks: I want to break free (IPC Berlin 2024)Ralf Eggert
In this presentation, we examine the challenges and limitations of relying too heavily on PHP frameworks in web development. We discuss the history of PHP and its frameworks to understand how this dependence has evolved. The focus will be on providing concrete tips and strategies to reduce reliance on these frameworks, based on real-world examples and practical considerations. The goal is to equip developers with the skills and knowledge to create more flexible and future-proof web applications. We'll explore the importance of maintaining autonomy in a rapidly changing tech landscape and how to make informed decisions in PHP development.
This talk is aimed at encouraging a more independent approach to using PHP frameworks, moving towards a more flexible and future-proof approach to PHP development.
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
"Impact of front-end architecture on development cost", Viktor TurskyiFwdays
I have heard many times that architecture is not important for the front-end. Also, many times I have seen how developers implement features on the front-end just following the standard rules for a framework and think that this is enough to successfully launch the project, and then the project fails. How to prevent this and what approach to choose? I have launched dozens of complex projects and during the talk we will analyze which approaches have worked for me and which have not.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Let's dive deeper into the world of ODC! Ricardo Alves (OutSystems) will join us to tell all about the new Data Fabric. After that, Sezen de Bruijn (OutSystems) will get into the details on how to best design a sturdy architecture within ODC.
Builder.ai Founder Sachin Dev Duggal's Strategic Approach to Create an Innova...Ramesh Iyer
In today's fast-changing business world, Companies that adapt and embrace new ideas often need help to keep up with the competition. However, fostering a culture of innovation takes much work. It takes vision, leadership and willingness to take risks in the right proportion. Sachin Dev Duggal, co-founder of Builder.ai, has perfected the art of this balance, creating a company culture where creativity and growth are nurtured at each stage.
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualityInflectra
In this insightful webinar, Inflectra explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming software development and testing. Discover how AI-powered tools are revolutionizing every stage of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), from design and prototyping to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
Learn about:
• The Future of Testing: How AI is shifting testing towards verification, analysis, and higher-level skills, while reducing repetitive tasks.
• Test Automation: How AI-powered test case generation, optimization, and self-healing tests are making testing more efficient and effective.
• Visual Testing: Explore the emerging capabilities of AI in visual testing and how it's set to revolutionize UI verification.
• Inflectra's AI Solutions: See demonstrations of Inflectra's cutting-edge AI tools like the ChatGPT plugin and Azure Open AI platform, designed to streamline your testing process.
Whether you're a developer, tester, or QA professional, this webinar will give you valuable insights into how AI is shaping the future of software delivery.
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
1. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions1
Chapter 8. Converter Transfer Functions
8.1. Review of Bode plots
8.1.1. Single pole response
8.1.2. Single zero response
8.1.3. Right half-plane zero
8.1.4. Frequency inversion
8.1.5. Combinations
8.1.6. Double pole response: resonance
8.1.7. The low-Q approximation
8.1.8. Approximate roots of an arbitrary-degree polynomial
8.2. Analysis of converter transfer functions
8.2.1. Example: transfer functions of the buck-boost converter
8.2.2. Transfer functions of some basic CCM converters
8.2.3. Physical origins of the right half-plane zero in converters
2. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions2
Converter Transfer Functions
8.3. Graphical construction of converter transfer
functions
8.3.1. Series impedances: addition of asymptotes
8.3.2. Parallel impedances: inverse addition of asymptotes
8.3.3. Another example
8.3.4. Voltage divider transfer functions: division of asymptotes
8.4. Measurement of ac transfer functions and
impedances
8.5. Summary of key points
3. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions3
The Engineering Design Process
1. Specifications and other design goals are defined.
2. A circuit is proposed. This is a creative process that draws on the
physical insight and experience of the engineer.
3. The circuit is modeled. The converter power stage is modeled as
described in Chapter 7. Components and other portions of the system
are modeled as appropriate, often with vendor-supplied data.
4. Design-oriented analysis of the circuit is performed. This involves
development of equations that allow element values to be chosen such
that specifications and design goals are met. In addition, it may be
necessary for the engineer to gain additional understanding and
physical insight into the circuit behavior, so that the design can be
improved by adding elements to the circuit or by changing circuit
connections.
5. Model verification. Predictions of the model are compared to a
laboratory prototype, under nominal operating conditions. The model is
refined as necessary, so that the model predictions agree with
laboratory measurements.
4. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions4
Design Process
6. Worst-case analysis (or other reliability and production yield
analysis) of the circuit is performed. This involves quantitative
evaluation of the model performance, to judge whether
specifications are met under all conditions. Computer
simulation is well-suited to this task.
7. Iteration. The above steps are repeated to improve the design
until the worst-case behavior meets specifications, or until the
reliability and production yield are acceptably high.
This Chapter: steps 4, 5, and 6
5. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions5
Buck-boost converter model
From Chapter 7
+
–
+
–
L
RC
1 : D D' : 1
vg(s) Id(s) Id(s)
i(s)
+
v(s)
–
(Vg – V) d(s)
Zout(s)Zin(s)
d(s) Control input
Line
input
Output
Gvg(s) =
v(s)
vg(s)
d(s) = 0
Gvd(s) =
v(s)
d(s) vg(s) = 0
6. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions6
Bode plot of control-to-output transfer function
with analytical expressions for important features
f
0˚
–90˚
–180˚
–270˚
|| Gvd ||
Gd0 =
|| Gvd || ∠ Gvd
0 dBV
–20 dBV
–40 dBV
20 dBV
40 dBV
60 dBV
80 dBV
Q =
∠ Gvd
10-1/2Q
f0
101/2Q
f0
0˚
–20 dB/decade
–40 dB/decade
–270˚
fz /10
10fz
1 MHz10 Hz 100 Hz 1 kHz 10 kHz 100 kHz
f0
V
DD' D'R C
L
D'
2π LC
D'2
R
2πDL
(RHP)
fz
DVg
ω(D')3
RC
Vg
ω2D'LC
7. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions7
Design-oriented analysis
How to approach a real (and hence, complicated) system
Problems:
Complicated derivations
Long equations
Algebra mistakes
Design objectives:
Obtain physical insight which leads engineer to synthesis of a good design
Obtain simple equations that can be inverted, so that element values can
be chosen to obtain desired behavior. Equations that cannot be inverted
are useless for design!
Design-oriented analysis is a structured approach to analysis, which attempts to
avoid the above problems
8. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions8
Some elements of design-oriented analysis,
discussed in this chapter
• Writing transfer functions in normalized form, to directly expose salient
features
• Obtaining simple analytical expressions for asymptotes, corner
frequencies, and other salient features, allows element values to be
selected such that a given desired behavior is obtained
• Use of inverted poles and zeroes, to refer transfer function gains to the
most important asymptote
• Analytical approximation of roots of high-order polynomials
• Graphical construction of Bode plots of transfer functions and
polynomials, to
avoid algebra mistakes
approximate transfer functions
obtain insight into origins of salient features
9. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions9
8.1. Review of Bode plots
Decibels
G dB
= 20 log10 G
Table 8.1. Expressing magnitudes in decibels
Actual magnitude Magnitude in dB
1/2 – 6dB
1 0 dB
2 6 dB
5 = 10/2 20 dB – 6 dB = 14 dB
10 20dB
1000 = 103
3 ⋅ 20dB = 60 dB
Z dB
= 20 log10
Z
Rbase
Decibels of quantities having
units (impedance example):
normalize before taking log
5Ω is equivalent to 14dB with respect to a base impedance of Rbase =
1Ω, also known as 14dBΩ.
60dBµA is a current 60dB greater than a base current of 1µA, or 1mA.
10. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions10
Bode plot of fn
G =
f
f0
n
Bode plots are effectively log-log plots, which cause functions which
vary as fn to become linear plots. Given:
Magnitude in dB is
G dB
= 20 log10
f
f0
n
= 20n log10
f
f0
f
f0
– 2
f
f0
2
0dB
–20dB
–40dB
–60dB
20dB
40dB
60dB
f
log scale
f00.1f0 10f0
f
f0
f
f0
– 1
n = 1
n
=
2
n
=
–2
n = –120 dB/decade
40dB/decade
–20dB/decade
–40dB/decade
• Slope is 20n dB/decade
• Magnitude is 1, or 0dB, at
frequency f = f0
11. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions11
8.1.1. Single pole response
+
–
R
Cv1(s)
+
v2(s)
–
Simple R-C example Transfer function is
G(s) =
v2(s)
v1(s)
=
1
sC
1
sC
+ R
G(s) = 1
1 + sRC
Express as rational fraction:
This coincides with the normalized
form
G(s) = 1
1 + s
ω0
with ω0 = 1
RC
12. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions12
G(jω) and || G(jω) ||
Im(G(jω))
Re(G(jω))
G(jω)
||G
(jω)||
∠G(jω)
G(jω) = 1
1 + j ω
ω0
=
1 – j ω
ω0
1 + ω
ω0
2
G(jω) = Re (G(jω))
2
+ Im (G(jω))
2
= 1
1 + ω
ω0
2
Let s = jω:
Magnitude is
Magnitude in dB:
G(jω) dB
= – 20 log10 1 + ω
ω0
2
dB
13. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions13
Asymptotic behavior: low frequency
G(jω) = 1
1 + ω
ω0
2
ω
ω0
<< 1
G(jω) ≈ 1
1
= 1
G(jω) dB
≈ 0dB
f
f0
– 1
–20dB/decade
f
f00.1f0 10f0
0dB
–20dB
–40dB
–60dB
0dB
|| G(jω) ||dB
For small frequency,
ω << ω0 and f << f0 :
Then || G(jω) ||
becomes
Or, in dB,
This is the low-frequency
asymptote of || G(jω) ||
14. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions14
Asymptotic behavior: high frequency
G(jω) = 1
1 + ω
ω0
2
f
f0
– 1
–20dB/decade
f
f00.1f0 10f0
0dB
–20dB
–40dB
–60dB
0dB
|| G(jω) ||dB
For high frequency,
ω >> ω0 and f >> f0 :
Then || G(jω) ||
becomes
The high-frequency asymptote of || G(jω) || varies as f-1.
Hence, n = -1, and a straight-line asymptote having a
slope of -20dB/decade is obtained. The asymptote has
a value of 1 at f = f0 .
ω
ω0
>> 1
1 + ω
ω0
2
≈ ω
ω0
2
G(jω) ≈ 1
ω
ω0
2
=
f
f0
– 1
15. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions15
Deviation of exact curve near f = f0
Evaluate exact magnitude:
at f = f0:
G(jω0) = 1
1 +
ω0
ω0
2
= 1
2
G(jω0) dB
= – 20 log10 1 +
ω0
ω0
2
≈ – 3 dB
at f = 0.5f0 and 2f0 :
Similar arguments show that the exact curve lies 1dB below
the asymptotes.
16. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions16
Summary: magnitude
–20dB/decade
f
f0
0dB
–10dB
–20dB
–30dB
|| G(jω) ||dB
3dB1dB
0.5f0 1dB
2f0
17. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions17
Phase of G(jω)
G(jω) = 1
1 + j ω
ω0
=
1 – j ω
ω0
1 + ω
ω0
2
∠G(jω) = tan– 1
Im G(jω)
Re G(jω)
Im(G(jω))
Re(G(jω))
G(jω)||G
(jω)||
∠G(jω)
∠G(jω) = – tan– 1
ω
ω0
18. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions18
-90˚
-75˚
-60˚
-45˚
-30˚
-15˚
0˚
f
0.01f0 0.1f0 f0 10f0 100f0
∠G(jω)
f0
-45˚
0˚ asymptote
–90˚ asymptote
Phase of G(jω)
∠G(jω) = – tan– 1
ω
ω0
ω ∠G(jω)
0 0˚
ω0
–45˚
∞ –90˚
19. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions19
Phase asymptotes
Low frequency: 0˚
High frequency: –90˚
Low- and high-frequency asymptotes do not intersect
Hence, need a midfrequency asymptote
Try a midfrequency asymptote having slope identical to actual slope at
the corner frequency f0. One can show that the asymptotes then
intersect at the break frequencies
fa = f0 e– π / 2
≈ f0 / 4.81
fb = f0 eπ / 2
≈ 4.81 f0
20. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions20
Phase asymptotes
fa = f0 e– π / 2
≈ f0 / 4.81
fb = f0 eπ / 2
≈ 4.81 f0
-90˚
-75˚
-60˚
-45˚
-30˚
-15˚
0˚
f
0.01f0 0.1f0 f0 100f0
∠G(jω)
f0
-45˚
fa = f0 / 4.81
fb = 4.81 f0
21. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions21
Phase asymptotes: a simpler choice
-90˚
-75˚
-60˚
-45˚
-30˚
-15˚
0˚
f
0.01f0 0.1f0 f0 100f0
∠G(jω)
f0
-45˚
fa = f0 / 10
fb
= 10 f0
fa = f0 / 10
fb = 10 f0
22. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions22
Summary: Bode plot of real pole
0˚
∠G(jω)
f0
-45˚
f0 / 10
10 f0
-90˚
5.7˚
5.7˚
-45˚/decade
–20dB/decade
f0
|| G(jω) ||dB 3dB1dB
0.5f0 1dB
2f0
0dB
G(s) = 1
1 + s
ω0
23. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions23
8.1.2. Single zero response
G(s) = 1 + s
ω0
Normalized form:
G(jω) = 1 + ω
ω0
2
∠G(jω) = tan– 1
ω
ω0
Magnitude:
Use arguments similar to those used for the simple pole, to derive
asymptotes:
0dB at low frequency, ω << ω0
+20dB/decade slope at high frequency, ω >> ω0
Phase:
—with the exception of a missing minus sign, same as simple pole
24. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions24
Summary: Bode plot, real zero
0˚∠G(jω)
f0
45˚
f0
/ 10
10 f0 +90˚
5.7˚
5.7˚
+45˚/decade
+20dB/decade
f0
|| G(jω) ||dB
3dB1dB
0.5f0
1dB
2f0
0dB
G(s) = 1 + s
ω0
25. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions25
8.1.3. Right half-plane zero
Normalized form:
G(jω) = 1 + ω
ω0
2
Magnitude:
—same as conventional (left half-plane) zero. Hence, magnitude
asymptotes are identical to those of LHP zero.
Phase:
—same as real pole.
The RHP zero exhibits the magnitude asymptotes of the LHP zero,
and the phase asymptotes of the pole
G(s) = 1 – s
ω0
∠G(jω) = – tan– 1
ω
ω0
26. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions26
+20dB/decade
f0
|| G(jω) ||dB
3dB1dB
0.5f0
1dB
2f0
0dB
0˚
∠G(jω)
f0
-45˚
f0
/ 10
10 f0
-90˚
5.7˚
5.7˚
-45˚/decade
Summary: Bode plot, RHP zero
G(s) = 1 – s
ω0
27. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions27
8.1.4. Frequency inversion
Reversal of frequency axis. A useful form when describing mid- or
high-frequency flat asymptotes. Normalized form, inverted pole:
An algebraically equivalent form:
The inverted-pole format emphasizes the high-frequency gain.
G(s) = 1
1 +
ω0
s
G(s) =
s
ω0
1 + s
ω0
28. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions28
Asymptotes, inverted pole
0˚
∠G(jω)
f0
+45˚
f0 / 10
10 f0
+90˚
5.7˚
5.7˚
-45˚/decade
0dB
+20dB/decade
f0
|| G(jω) ||dB
3dB
1dB
0.5f0
1dB
2f0
G(s) = 1
1 +
ω0
s
29. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions29
Inverted zero
Normalized form, inverted zero:
An algebraically equivalent form:
Again, the inverted-zero format emphasizes the high-frequency gain.
G(s) = 1 +
ω0
s
G(s) =
1 + s
ω0
s
ω0
30. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions30
Asymptotes, inverted zero
0˚
∠G(jω)
f0
–45˚
f0 / 10
10 f0
–90˚
5.7˚
5.7˚
+45˚/decade
–20dB/decade
f0
|| G(jω) ||dB
3dB
1dB
0.5f0
1dB
2f0
0dB
G(s) = 1 +
ω0
s
31. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions31
8.1.5. Combinations
Suppose that we have constructed the Bode diagrams of two
complex-values functions of frequency, G1(ω) and G2(ω). It is desired
to construct the Bode diagram of the product, G3(ω) = G1(ω) G2(ω).
Express the complex-valued functions in polar form:
G1(ω) = R1(ω) ejθ1(ω)
G2(ω) = R2(ω) ejθ2(ω)
G3(ω) = R3(ω) ejθ3(ω)
The product G3(ω) can then be written
G3(ω) = G1(ω) G2(ω) = R1(ω) ejθ1(ω)
R2(ω) ejθ2(ω)
G3(ω) = R1(ω) R2(ω) ej(θ1(ω) + θ2(ω))
32. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions32
Combinations
G3(ω) = R1(ω) R2(ω) ej(θ1(ω) + θ2(ω))
The composite phase is
θ3(ω) = θ1(ω) + θ2(ω)
The composite magnitude is
R3(ω) = R1(ω) R2(ω)
R3(ω) dB
= R1(ω) dB
+ R2(ω) dB
Composite phase is sum of individual phases.
Composite magnitude, when expressed in dB, is sum of individual
magnitudes.
33. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions33
Example 1: G(s) =
G0
1 + s
ω1
1 + s
ω2
–40 dB/decade
f
|| G ||
∠ G
∠ G|| G ||
0˚
–45˚
–90˚
–135˚
–180˚
–60 dB
0 dB
–20 dB
–40 dB
20 dB
40 dB
f1
100 Hz
f2
2 kHz
G0 = 40 ⇒ 32 dB
–20 dB/decade
0 dB
f1
/10
10 Hz
f2
/10
200 Hz
10f1
1 kHz
10f2
20 kHz
0˚
–45˚/decade
–90˚/decade
–45˚/decade
1 Hz 10 Hz 100 Hz 1 kHz 10 kHz 100 kHz
with G0 = 40 ⇒ 32 dB, f1 = ω1/2π = 100 Hz, f2 = ω2/2π = 2 kHz
34. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions34
Example 2
|| A ||
∠ A
f1
f2
|| A0 ||dB
+20 dB/dec
f1
/10
10f1 f2 /10
10f2
–45˚/dec+45˚/dec
0˚
|| A∞ ||dB
0˚
–90˚
Determine the transfer function A(s) corresponding to the following
asymptotes:
35. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions35
Example 2, continued
One solution:
A(s) = A0
1 + s
ω1
1 + s
ω2
Analytical expressions for asymptotes:
For f < f1
A0
1 + s
ω1
➚
1 + s
ω2
➚
s = jω
= A0
1
1
= A0
For f1 < f < f2
A0
1➚ + s
ω1
1 + s
ω2
➚
s = jω
= A0
s
ω1 s = jω
1
= A0
ω
ω1
= A0
f
f1
36. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions36
Example 2, continued
For f > f2
A0
1➚ + s
ω1
1➚ + s
ω2
s = jω
= A0
s
ω1 s = jω
s
ω2 s = jω
= A0
ω2
ω1
= A0
f2
f1
So the high-frequency asymptote is
A∞ = A0
f2
f1
Another way to express A(s): use inverted poles and zeroes, and
express A(s) directly in terms of A∞
A(s) = A∞
1 +
ω1
s
1 +
ω2
s
37. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions37
8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance
+
–
L
C Rv1(s)
+
v2(s)
–
Two-pole low-pass filter example
Example
G(s) =
v2(s)
v1(s)
= 1
1 + sL
R
+ s2
LC
Second-order denominator, of
the form
G(s) = 1
1 + a1s + a2s2
with a1 = L/R and a2 = LC
How should we construct the Bode diagram?
38. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions38
Approach 1: factor denominator
G(s) = 1
1 + a1s + a2s2
We might factor the denominator using the quadratic formula, then
construct Bode diagram as the combination of two real poles:
G(s) = 1
1 – s
s1
1 – s
s2
with s1 = –
a1
2a2
1 – 1 –
4a2
a1
2
s2 = –
a1
2a2
1 + 1 –
4a2
a1
2
• If 4a2 ≤ a1
2, then the roots s1 and s2 are real. We can construct Bode
diagram as the combination of two real poles.
• If 4a2 > a1
2, then the roots are complex. In Section 8.1.1, the
assumption was made that ω0 is real; hence, the results of that
section cannot be applied and we need to do some additional work.
39. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions39
Approach 2: Define a standard normalized form
for the quadratic case
G(s) = 1
1 + 2ζ s
ω0
+ s
ω0
2 G(s) = 1
1 + s
Qω0
+ s
ω0
2or
• When the coefficients of s are real and positive, then the parameters ζ,
ω0, and Q are also real and positive
• The parameters ζ, ω0, and Q are found by equating the coefficients of s
• The parameter ω0 is the angular corner frequency, and we can define f0
= ω0/2π
• The parameter ζ is called the damping factor. ζ controls the shape of the
exact curve in the vicinity of f = f0. The roots are complex when ζ < 1.
• In the alternative form, the parameter Q is called the quality factor. Q
also controls the shape of the exact curve in the vicinity of f = f0. The
roots are complex when Q > 0.5.
40. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions40
The Q-factor
Q = 1
2ζ
In a second-order system, ζ and Q are related according to
Q is a measure of the dissipation in the system. A more general
definition of Q, for sinusoidal excitation of a passive element or system
is
Q = 2π
(peak stored energy)
(energy dissipated per cycle)
For a second-order passive system, the two equations above are
equivalent. We will see that Q has a simple interpretation in the Bode
diagrams of second-order transfer functions.
41. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions41
Analytical expressions for f0 and Q
G(s) =
v2(s)
v1(s)
= 1
1 + sL
R
+ s2
LC
Two-pole low-pass filter
example: we found that
G(s) = 1
1 + s
Qω0
+ s
ω0
2
Equate coefficients of like
powers of s with the
standard form
Result:
f0 =
ω0
2π
= 1
2π LC
Q = R C
L
42. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions42
Magnitude asymptotes, quadratic form
G(jω) = 1
1 – ω
ω0
2 2
+ 1
Q2
ω
ω0
2
G(s) = 1
1 + s
Qω0
+ s
ω0
2
In the form
let s = jω and find magnitude:
Asymptotes are
G → 1 for ω << ω0
G →
f
f0
– 2
for ω >> ω0
f
f0
– 2
–40 dB/decade
f
f00.1f0 10f0
0 dB
|| G(jω) ||dB
0 dB
–20 dB
–40 dB
–60 dB
43. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions43
Deviation of exact curve from magnitude asymptotes
G(jω) = 1
1 – ω
ω0
2 2
+ 1
Q2
ω
ω0
2
At ω = ω0, the exact magnitude is
G(jω0) = Q G(jω0) dB
= Q dBor, in dB:
The exact curve has magnitude
Q at f = f0. The deviation of the
exact curve from the
asymptotes is | Q |dB
|| G ||
f0
| Q |dB0 dB
–40 dB/decade
45. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions45
8.1.7. The low-Q approximation
G(s) = 1
1 + a1s + a2s2 G(s) = 1
1 + s
Qω0
+ s
ω0
2
Given a second-order denominator polynomial, of the form
or
When the roots are real, i.e., when Q < 0.5, then we can factor the
denominator, and construct the Bode diagram using the asymptotes
for real poles. We would then use the following normalized form:
G(s) = 1
1 + s
ω1
1 + s
ω2
This is a particularly desirable approach when Q << 0.5, i.e., when the
corner frequencies ω1 and ω2 are well separated.
46. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions46
An example
A problem with this procedure is the complexity of the quadratic
formula used to find the corner frequencies.
R-L-C network example:
+
–
L
C Rv1(s)
+
v2(s)
–
G(s) =
v2(s)
v1(s)
= 1
1 + sL
R
+ s2
LC
Use quadratic formula to factor denominator. Corner frequencies are:
ω1, ω2 =
L / R ± L / R
2
– 4 LC
2 LC
47. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions47
Factoring the denominator
ω1, ω2 =
L / R ± L / R
2
– 4 LC
2 LC
This complicated expression yields little insight into how the corner
frequencies ω1 and ω2 depend on R, L, and C.
When the corner frequencies are well separated in value, it can be
shown that they are given by the much simpler (approximate)
expressions
ω1 ≈ R
L
, ω2 ≈ 1
RC
ω1 is then independent of C, and ω2 is independent of L.
These simpler expressions can be derived via the Low-Q Approximation.
48. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions48
Derivation of the Low-Q Approximation
G(s) = 1
1 + s
Qω0
+ s
ω0
2
Given
Use quadratic formula to express corner frequencies ω1 and ω2 in
terms of Q and ω0 as:
ω1 =
ω0
Q
1 – 1 – 4Q2
2
ω2 =
ω0
Q
1 + 1 – 4Q2
2
49. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions49
Corner frequency ω2
ω2 =
ω0
Q
1 + 1 – 4Q2
2
ω2 =
ω0
Q
F(Q)
F(Q) = 1
2
1 + 1 – 4Q2
ω2 ≈
ω0
Q
for Q << 1
2
F(Q)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Q
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
can be written in the form
where
For small Q, F(Q) tends to 1.
We then obtain
For Q < 0.3, the approximation F(Q) = 1 is
within 10% of the exact value.
50. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions50
Corner frequency ω1
F(Q) = 1
2
1 + 1 – 4Q2
F(Q)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Q
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
can be written in the form
where
For small Q, F(Q) tends to 1.
We then obtain
For Q < 0.3, the approximation F(Q) = 1 is
within 10% of the exact value.
ω1 =
ω0
Q
1 – 1 – 4Q2
2
ω1 =
Q ω0
F(Q)
ω1 ≈ Q ω0 for Q << 1
2
51. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions51
The Low-Q Approximation
f2 =
f0F(Q)
Q
≈
f0
Q
–40dB/decade
f0
0dB
|| G ||dB
–20dB/decade
f1 =
Qf0
F(Q)
≈ Qf0
52. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions52
R-L-C Example
ω1 ≈ Q ω0 = R C
L
1
LC
= R
L
ω2 ≈
ω0
Q
= 1
LC
1
R C
L
= 1
RC
G(s) =
v2(s)
v1(s)
= 1
1 + sL
R
+ s2
LC
f0 =
ω0
2π
= 1
2π LC
Q = R C
L
For the previous example:
Use of the Low-Q Approximation leads to
53. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions53
8.1.8. Approximate Roots of an
Arbitrary-Degree Polynomial
Generalize the low-Q approximation to obtain approximate
factorization of the nth-order polynomial
P(s) = 1 + a1 s + a2 s2
+ + an sn
It is desired to factor this polynomial in the form
P(s) = 1 + τ1 s 1 + τ2 s 1 + τn s
When the roots are real and well separated in value, then approximate
analytical expressions for the time constants τ1, τ2, ... τn can be found,
that typically are simple functions of the circuit element values.
Objective: find a general method for deriving such expressions.
Include the case of complex root pairs.
54. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions54
Derivation of method
Multiply out factored form of polynomial, then equate to original form
(equate like powers of s):
a1 = τ1 + τ2 + + τn
a2 = τ1 τ2 + + τn + τ2 τ3 + + τn +
a3 = τ1τ2 τ3 + + τn + τ2τ3 τ4 + + τn +
an = τ1τ2τ3 τn
• Exact system of equations relating roots to original coefficients
• Exact general solution is hopeless
• Under what conditions can solution for time constants be easily
approximated?
55. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions55
Approximation of time constants
when roots are real and well separated
a1 = τ1 + τ2 + + τn
a2 = τ1 τ2 + + τn + τ2 τ3 + + τn +
a3 = τ1τ2 τ3 + + τn + τ2τ3 τ4 + + τn +
an = τ1τ2τ3 τn
System of equations:
(from previous slide)
Suppose that roots are real and well-separated, and are arranged in
decreasing order of magnitude:
τ1 >> τ2 >> >> τn
Then the first term of each equation is dominant
⇒ Neglect second and following terms in each equation above
56. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions56
Approximation of time constants
when roots are real and well separated
System of equations:
(only first term in each
equation is included)
a1 ≈ τ1
a2 ≈ τ1τ2
a3 ≈ τ1τ2τ3
an = τ1τ2τ3 τn
Solve for the time
constants:
τ1 ≈ a1
τ2 ≈
a2
a1
τ3 ≈
a3
a2
τn ≈
an
an – 1
57. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions57
Result
when roots are real and well separated
If the following inequalities are satisfied
a1 >>
a2
a1
>>
a3
a2
>> >>
an
an – 1
Then the polynomial P(s) has the following approximate factorization
P(s) ≈ 1 + a1 s 1 +
a2
a1
s 1 +
a3
a2
s 1 +
an
an – 1
s
• If the an coefficients are simple analytical functions of the element
values L, C, etc., then the roots are similar simple analytical
functions of L, C, etc.
• Numerical values are used to justify the approximation, but
analytical expressions for the roots are obtained
58. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions58
When two roots are not well separated
then leave their terms in quadratic form
Suppose inequality k is not satisfied:
a1 >>
a2
a1
>> >>
ak
ak – 1
>>✖
ak + 1
ak
>> >>
an
an – 1
↑
not
satisfied
Then leave the terms corresponding to roots k and (k + 1) in quadratic
form, as follows:
P(s) ≈ 1 + a1 s 1 +
a2
a1
s 1 +
ak
ak – 1
s +
ak + 1
ak – 1
s2
1 +
an
an – 1
s
This approximation is accurate provided
a1 >>
a2
a1
>> >>
ak
ak – 1
>>
ak – 2 ak + 1
ak – 1
2
>>
ak + 2
ak + 1
>> >>
an
an – 1
59. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions59
When the first inequality is violated
A special case for quadratic roots
a1 >>✖
a2
a1
>>
a3
a2
>> >>
an
an – 1
↑
not
satisfied
When inequality 1 is not satisfied:
Then leave the first two roots in quadratic form, as follows:
This approximation is justified provided
P(s) ≈ 1 + a1s + a2s2
1 +
a3
a2
s 1 +
an
an – 1
s
a2
2
a3
>> a1 >>
a3
a2
>>
a4
a3
>> >>
an
an – 1
60. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions60
Other cases
• When several isolated inequalities are violated
—Leave the corresponding roots in quadratic form
—See next two slides
• When several adjacent inequalities are violated
—Then the corresponding roots are close in value
—Must use cubic or higher-order roots
61. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions61
Leaving adjacent roots in quadratic form
a1 >
a2
a1
> >
ak
ak – 1
≥
ak + 1
ak
> >
an
an – 1
In the case when inequality k is not satisfied:
P(s) ≈ 1 + a1 s 1 +
a2
a1
s 1 +
ak
ak – 1
s +
ak + 1
ak – 1
s2 1 +
an
an – 1
s
Then leave the corresponding roots in quadratic form:
This approximation is accurate provided that
a1 >
a2
a1
> >
ak
ak – 1
>
ak – 2 ak + 1
ak – 1
2 >
ak + 2
ak + 1
> >
an
an – 1
(derivation is similar to the case of well-separated roots)
62. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions62
When the first inequality is not satisfied
The formulas of the previous slide require a special form for the case when
the first inequality is not satisfied:
a1 ≥
a2
a1
>
a3
a2
> >
an
an – 1
P(s) ≈ 1 + a1s + a2s2 1 +
a3
a2
s 1 +
an
an – 1
s
We should then use the following form:
a2
2
a3
> a1 >
a3
a2
>
a4
a3
> >
an
an – 1
The conditions for validity of this approximation are:
63. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions63
Example
Damped input EMI filter
+
–
vg
ig ic
C
R
L1
L2 Converter
G(s) =
ig(s)
ic(s)
=
1 + s
L1 + L2
R
1 + s
L1 + L2
R
+ s2L1C + s3 L1L2C
R
64. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions64
Example
Approximate factorization of a third-order denominator
The filter transfer function from the previous slide is
—contains a third-order denominator, with the following coefficients:
a1 =
L1 + L2
R
a2 = L1C
a3 =
L1L2C
R
G(s) =
ig(s)
ic(s)
=
1 + s
L1 + L2
R
1 + s
L1 + L2
R
+ s2L1C + s3 L1L2C
R
65. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions65
Real roots case
Factorization as three real roots:
1 + s
L1 + L2
R
1 + sRC
L1
L1 + L2
1 + s
L2
R
This approximate analytical factorization is justified provided
L1 + L2
R
>> RC
L1
L1 + L2
>>
L2
R
Note that these inequalities cannot be satisfied unless L1 >> L2. The
above inequalities can then be further simplified to
L1
R
>> RC >>
L2
R
And the factored polynomial reduces to
1 + s
L1
R
1 + sRC 1 + s
L2
R
• Illustrates in a simple
way how the roots
depend on the
element values
66. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions66
When the second inequality is violated
L1 + L2
R
>> RC
L1
L1 + L2
>>✖
L2
R
↑
not
satisfied
Then leave the second and third roots in quadratic form:
1 + s
L1 + L2
R
1 + sRC
L1
L1 + L2
+ s2
L1||L2 C
P(s) = 1 + a1s 1 +
a2
a1
s +
a3
a1
s2
which is
67. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions67
Validity of the approximation
This is valid provided
L1 + L2
R
>> RC
L1
L1 + L2
>>
L1||L2
L1 + L2
RC (use a0 = 1)
These inequalities are equivalent to
L1 >> L2, and
L1
R
>> RC
It is no longer required that RC >> L2/R
The polynomial can therefore be written in the simplified form
1 + s
L1
R
1 + sRC + s2
L2C
68. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions68
When the first inequality is violated
Then leave the first and second roots in quadratic form:
which is
L1 + L2
R
>>✖ RC
L1
L1 + L2
>>
L2
R
↑
not
satisfied
1 + s
L1 + L2
R
+ s2
L1C 1 + s
L2
R
P(s) = 1 + a1s + a2s2
1 +
a3
a2
s
69. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions69
Validity of the approximation
This is valid provided
These inequalities are equivalent to
It is no longer required that L1/R >> RC
The polynomial can therefore be written in the simplified form
L1RC
L2
>>
L1 + L2
R
>>
L2
R
L1 >> L2, and RC >>
L2
R
1 + s
L1
R
+ s2
L1C 1 + s
L2
R
70. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions70
8.2. Analysis of converter transfer functions
8.2.1. Example: transfer functions of the buck-boost converter
8.2.2. Transfer functions of some basic CCM converters
8.2.3. Physical origins of the right half-plane zero in converters
71. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions71
8.2.1. Example: transfer functions of the
buck-boost converter
Small-signal ac model of the buck-boost converter, derived in Chapter 7:
+
–
+
–
L
RC
1 : D D' : 1
vg(s) I d(s) Id(s)
i(s)
(Vg – V)d(s)
+
v(s)
–
72. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions72
Definition of transfer functions
The converter contains two inputs, and and one output,
Hence, the ac output voltage variations can be expressed as the
superposition of terms arising from the two inputs:
v(s) = Gvd(s) d(s) + Gvg(s) vg(s)
d(s) vg(s) v(s)
The control-to-output and line-to-output transfer functions can be
defined as
Gvd(s) =
v(s)
d(s) vg(s) = 0
and Gvg(s) =
v(s)
vg(s) d(s) = 0
73. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions73
Derivation of
line-to-output transfer function Gvg(s)
+
–
L
RC
1 : D D' : 1
vg(s)
+
v(s)
–
Set d sources to
zero:
+
– RC
+
v(s)
–
L
D'2
vg(s) – D
D'
Push elements through
transformers to output
side:
74. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions74
Derivation of transfer functions
+
– RC
+
v(s)
–
L
D'2
vg(s) – D
D'
Use voltage divider formula
to solve for transfer function:
Gvg(s) =
v(s)
vg(s)
d(s) = 0
= – D
D'
R || 1
sC
sL
D'2 + R || 1
sC
Expand parallel combination and express as a rational fraction:
Gvg(s) = – D
D'
R
1 + sRC
sL
D'2 + R
1 + sRC
= – D
D'
R
R + sL
D'2 + s2RLC
D'2
We aren’t done yet! Need to
write in normalized form, where
the coefficient of s0 is 1, and
then identify salient features
75. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions75
Derivation of transfer functions
Divide numerator and denominator by R. Result: the line-to-output
transfer function is
Gvg(s) =
v(s)
vg(s) d(s) = 0
= – D
D'
1
1 + s L
D'2
R
+ s2 LC
D'2
which is of the following standard form:
Gvg(s) = Gg0
1
1 + s
Qω0
+ s
ω0
2
76. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions76
Salient features of the line-to-output transfer function
Gg0 = – D
D'
Equate standard form to derived transfer function, to determine
expressions for the salient features:
1
ω0
2 = LC
D'2 ω0 = D'
LC
1
Qω0
= L
D'2
R Q = D'R C
L
77. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions77
Derivation of
control-to-output transfer function Gvd(s)
+
–
L
RC
D' : 1
I d(s)
(Vg – V) d(s)
+
v(s)
–
In small-signal model,
set vg source to zero:
+
–
RCId(s)
+
v(s)
–
L
D'2
Vg – V
D'
d(s)
Push all elements to
output side of
transformer:
There are two d sources. One way to solve the model is to use superposition,
expressing the output v as a sum of terms arising from the two sources.
78. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions78
Superposition
+
–
RC
+
v(s)
–
L
D'2
Vg – V
D'
d(s)
RCI d(s)
+
v(s)
–
L
D'2
v(s)
d(s)
= –
Vg – V
D'
R || 1
sC
sL
D'2 + R || 1
sC
With the voltage
source only:
With the current
source alone: v(s)
d(s)
= I sL
D'2 || R || 1
sC
Total: Gvd(s) = –
Vg – V
D'
R || 1
sC
sL
D'2 + R || 1
sC
+ I sL
D'2 || R || 1
sC
79. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions79
Control-to-output transfer function
Gvd(s) =
v(s)
d(s) vg(s) = 0
= –
Vg – V
D'2
1 – s LI
Vg – V
1 + s L
D'2
R
+ s2 LC
D'2
This is of the following standard form:
Gvd(s) = Gd0
1 – s
ωz
1 + s
Qω0
+ s
ω0
2
Express in normalized form:
80. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions80
Salient features of control-to-output transfer function
ωz =
Vg – V
L I
= D' R
D L
(RHP)
ω0 = D'
LC
Q = D'R C
L
V = – D
D'
Vg
I = – V
D' R
— Simplified using the dc relations:
Gd0 = –
Vg – V
D'
= –
Vg
D'2 = V
DD'
81. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions81
Plug in numerical values
Suppose we are given the
following numerical values:
D = 0.6
R = 10Ω
Vg = 30V
L = 160µH
C = 160µF
Then the salient features
have the following numerical
values:
Gg0 = D
D'
= 1.5 ⇒ 3.5 dB
Gd0 =
V
DD'
= 187.5 V ⇒ 45.5 dBV
f0 =
ω0
2π
= D'
2π LC
= 400 Hz
Q = D'R C
L
= 4 ⇒ 12 dB
fz =
ωz
2π
= D'2
R
2πDL
= 2.65 kHz
83. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions83
Bode plot: line-to-output transfer function
f
|| Gvg ||
|| Gvg ||
∠ Gvg
10–1/2Q0 f0
101/2Q0 f0
0˚ 300 Hz
533 Hz
–180˚
–60 dB
–80 dB
–40 dB
–20 dB
0 dB
20 dB
Gg0
= 1.5
⇒ 3.5 dB
f0
Q = 4 ⇒ 12 dB
400 Hz –40 dB/decade
0˚
–90˚
–180˚
–270˚
∠ Gvg
10 Hz 100 Hz 1 kHz 10 kHz 100 kHz
84. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions84
8.2.2. Transfer functions of
some basic CCM converters
Table 8.2. Salient features of the small-signal CCM transfer functions of some basic dc-dc converters
Converter Gg0 Gd0 ω0 Q ωz
buck D
V
D
1
LC
R C
L ∞
boost
1
D'
V
D'
D'
LC
D'R C
L
D'2
R
L
buck-boost – D
D'
V
D D'
2
D'
LC
D'R C
L
D'2
R
D L
where the transfer functions are written in the standard forms
Gvd(s) = Gd0
1 – s
ωz
1 + s
Qω0
+ s
ω0
2
Gvg(s) = Gg0
1
1 + s
Qω0
+ s
ω0
2
85. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions85
8.2.3. Physical origins of the right half-plane zero
G(s) = 1 – s
ω0
• phase reversal at
high frequency
• transient response:
output initially tends
in wrong direction
+
–
1
s
ωz
uout(s)uin(s)
86. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions86
Two converters whose CCM control-to-output
transfer functions exhibit RHP zeroes
Boost
Buck-boost
iD Ts
= d' iL Ts
+
–
L
C R
+
v
–
1
2
vg
iL(t)
iD(t)
+
– L
C R
+
v
–
1 2
vg
iL(t)
iD(t)
87. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions87
Waveforms, step increase in duty cycle
iD Ts
= d' iL Ts
• Increasing d(t)
causes the average
diode current to
initially decrease
• As inductor current
increases to its new
equilibrium value,
average diode
current eventually
increases
t
iD(t)
〈iD(t)〉Ts
t
| v(t) |
t
iL(t)
d = 0.6d = 0.4
89. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions89
Transfer functions predicted by canonical model
+
–
+
–
1 : M(D)
Le
C Rvg(s)
e(s) d(s)
j(s) d(s)
+
–
v(s)
+
–
ve(s)
He(s)
Zout
Z2Z1
{
{
Zin
90. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions90
Output impedance Zout: set sources to zero
Le C R
Zout
Z2Z1
{
{Zout = Z1 || Z2
91. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions91
Graphical construction of output impedance
1
ωC
R
|| Zout ||
f0
R0
|| Z1 || = ωLe
Q = R / R0
92. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions92
Graphical construction of
filter effective transfer function
f0
Q = R / R0
ωLe
ωLe
= 1
1 /ωC
ωLe
= 1
ω2LeC
He =
Zout
Z1
93. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions93
Boost and buck-boost converters: Le = L / D’ 2
1
ωC
R
|| Zout ||
f0
R0
Q = R / R0
ωL
D'2
increasing
D
94. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions94
8.4. Measurement of ac transfer functions
and impedances
Network Analyzer
Injection source Measured inputs
vy
magnitude
vz
frequency
vz
output
vz
+
–
input
vx
input
+ – + –
vy
vx
vy
vx
Data
17.3 dB
– 134.7˚
Data bus
to computer
95. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions95
Swept sinusoidal measurements
• Injection source produces sinusoid of controllable amplitude and
frequency
• Signal inputs and perform function of narrowband tracking
voltmeter:
Component of input at injection source frequency is measured
Narrowband function is essential: switching harmonics and other
noise components are removed
• Network analyzer measures
vz
vx vy
∠
vy
vx
vy
vx
and
96. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions96
Measurement of an ac transfer function
Network Analyzer
Injection source Measured inputs
vy
magnitude
vz
frequency
vz
output
vz
+
–
input
vx
input
+ – + –
vy
vx
vy
vx
Data
–4.7 dB
– 162.8˚
Data bus
to computer
Device
under test
G(s)
input
output
VCC
DC
bias
adjust
DC
blocking
capacitor
• Potentiometer
establishes correct
quiescent operating
point
• Injection sinusoid
coupled to device
input via dc blocking
capacitor
• Actual device input
and output voltages
are measured as
and
• Dynamics of blocking
capacitor are irrelevant
vx
vy
vy(s)
vx(s)
= G(s)
97. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions97
Measurement of an output impedance
Z(s) =
v(s)
i(s)
VCC
DC
bias
adjust
Device
under test
G(s)
input
output
Zout +
– vz
iout
vy
+ –
voltage
probe
Zs
{
Rsource
DC blocking
capacitor
current
probe
vx
+ –
Zout(s) =
vy(s)
iout(s) amplifier
ac input
= 0
98. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions98
Measurement of output impedance
• Treat output impedance as transfer function from output current to
output voltage:
• Potentiometer at device input port establishes correct quiescent
operating point
• Current probe produces voltage proportional to current; this voltage
is connected to network analyzer channel
• Network analyzer result must be multiplied by appropriate factor, to
account for scale factors of current and voltage probes
vx
Z(s) =
v(s)
i(s)
Zout(s) =
vy(s)
iout(s) amplifier
ac input
= 0
99. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions99
Measurement of small impedances
Impedance
under test
Z(s) +
– vz
iout
vy
+
–
voltage
probe
Rsource
vx
+
–
Network Analyzer
Injection source
Measured
inputs
voltage
probe
return
connection
injection
source
return
connection
iout
Zrz
{
{
Zprobe
k iout
(1 – k) iout
+ –
(1 – k) iout Zprobe
Grounding problems
cause measurement
to fail:
Injection current can
return to analyzer via
two paths. Injection
current which returns
via voltage probe ground
induces voltage drop in
voltage probe, corrupting the
measurement. Network
analyzer measures
Z + (1 – k) Zprobe = Z + Zprobe || Zrz
For an accurate measurement, require
Z >> Zprobe || Zrz
100. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions100
Improved measurement: add isolation transformer
Impedance
under test
Z(s) +
– vz
iout
vy
+
–
voltage
probe
Rsource
vx
+
–
Network Analyzer
Injection source
Measured
inputs
voltage
probe
return
connection
injection
source
return
connection
Zrz
{
{Zprobe
+ –0V
0
iout
1 : n
Injection
current must
now return
entirely
through
transformer.
No additional
voltage is
induced in
voltage probe
ground
connection
101. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions101
8.5. Summary of key points
1. The magnitude Bode diagrams of functions which vary as (f / f0)n
have slopes equal to 20n dB per decade, and pass through 0dB at
f = f0.
2. It is good practice to express transfer functions in normalized pole-
zero form; this form directly exposes expressions for the salient
features of the response, i.e., the corner frequencies, reference
gain, etc.
3. The right half-plane zero exhibits the magnitude response of the
left half-plane zero, but the phase response of the pole.
4. Poles and zeroes can be expressed in frequency-inverted form,
when it is desirable to refer the gain to a high-frequency asymptote.
102. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions102
Summary of key points
5. A two-pole response can be written in the standard normalized
form of Eq. (8-53). When Q > 0.5, the poles are complex
conjugates. The magnitude response then exhibits peaking in the
vicinity of the corner frequency, with an exact value of Q at f = f0.
High Q also causes the phase to change sharply near the corner
frequency.
6. When the Q is less than 0.5, the two pole response can be plotted
as two real poles. The low- Q approximation predicts that the two
poles occur at frequencies f0 / Q and Qf0. These frequencies are
within 10% of the exact values for Q ≤ 0.3.
7. The low- Q approximation can be extended to find approximate
roots of an arbitrary degree polynomial. Approximate analytical
expressions for the salient features can be derived. Numerical
values are used to justify the approximations.
103. Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions103
Summary of key points
8. Salient features of the transfer functions of the buck, boost, and buck-
boost converters are tabulated in section 8.2.2. The line-to-output
transfer functions of these converters contain two poles. Their control-
to-output transfer functions contain two poles, and may additionally
contain a right half-pland zero.
9. Approximate magnitude asymptotes of impedances and transfer
functions can be easily derived by graphical construction. This
approach is a useful supplement to conventional analysis, because it
yields physical insight into the circuit behavior, and because it
exposes suitable approximations. Several examples, including the
impedances of basic series and parallel resonant circuits and the
transfer function He(s) of the boost and buck-boost converters, are
worked in section 8.3.
10. Measurement of transfer functions and impedances using a network
analyzer is discussed in section 8.4. Careful attention to ground
connections is important when measuring small impedances.