APPLICATIONS OF DIFFERENTIATION
4
4.4
Indeterminate Forms
and L’Hospital’s Rule
APPLICATIONS OF DIFFERENTIATION
In this section, we will learn:
How to evaluate functions whose
values cannot be found at certain points.
Suppose we are trying to analyze
the behavior of the function
Although F is not defined when x = 1,
we need to know how F behaves near 1.
ln
( )
1
x
F x
x


INDETERMINATE FORMS
In particular, we would like to know
the value of the limit
1
ln
lim
1
x
x
x
 
Expression 1
INDETERMINATE FORMS
In computing this limit, we can’t apply
Law 5 of limits (Section 2.3) because
the limit of the denominator is 0.
 In fact, although the limit in Expression 1 exists,
its value is not obvious because both numerator
and denominator approach 0 and is not defined.
0
0
INDETERMINATE FORMS
INDETERMINATE FORM —TYPE 0/0
In general, if we have a limit of the form
where both f(x) → 0 and g(x) → 0 as x → a,
then this limit may or may not exist.
It is called an indeterminate form of type .
 We met some limits of this type in Chapter 2.
( )
lim
( )
x a
f x
g x

0
0
INDETERMINATE FORMS
For rational functions, we can cancel
common factors:
2
2
1 1
1
( 1)
lim lim
( 1)( 1)
1
1
lim
1 2
x x
x
x x x x
x x
x
x
x
 

 

 

 

INDETERMINATE FORMS
We used a geometric argument
to show that:
0
sin
lim 1
x
x
x


INDETERMINATE FORMS
However, these methods do not work
for limits such as Expression 1.
 Hence, in this section, we introduce
a systematic method, known as l’Hospital’s Rule,
for the evaluation of indeterminate forms.
INDETERMINATE FORMS
Another situation in which a limit is
not obvious occurs when we look for
a horizontal asymptote of F and need
to evaluate the limit ln
lim
1
x
x
x
 
Expression 2
INDETERMINATE FORMS
It isn’t obvious how to evaluate this limit
because both numerator and denominator
become large as x → ∞.
There is a struggle between the two.
 If the numerator wins, the limit will be ∞.
 If the denominator wins, the answer will be 0.
 Alternatively, there may be some compromise—
the answer may be some finite positive number.
INDETERMINATE FORM —TYPE ∞/∞
In general, if we have a limit of the form
where both f(x) → ∞ (or -∞) and g(x) → ∞
(or -∞), then the limit may or may not exist.
It is called an indeterminate form of type ∞/∞.
( )
lim
( )
x a
f x
g x

INDETERMINATE FORMS
We saw in Section 2.6 that this type of limit
can be evaluated for certain functions—
including rational functions—by dividing the
numerator and denominator by the highest
power of x that occurs in the denominator.
 For instance,
2 2
2
2
1
1
1 1 0 1
lim lim
1 2 0 2
2 1
2
x x
x x
x
x
 

 
  



INDETERMINATE FORMS
This method, though, does not work
for limits such as Expression 2.
 However, L’Hospital’s Rule also applies to
this type of indeterminate form.
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
Suppose f and g are differentiable and
g’(x) ≠ 0 on an open interval I that contains a
(except possibly at a).
Suppose
or that
 In other words, we have an indeterminate form
of type or ∞/∞.
lim ( ) 0 and lim ( ) 0
x a x a
f x g x
 
 
0
0
lim ( ) and lim ( )
x a x a
f x g x
 
   
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
Then,
if the limit on the right exists
(or is ∞ or - ∞).
( ) '( )
lim lim
( ) '( )
x a x a
f x f x
g x g x
 

NOTE 1
L’Hospital’s Rule says that the limit of
a quotient of functions is equal to the limit of
the quotient of their derivatives—provided that
the given conditions are satisfied.
 It is especially important to verify the conditions
regarding the limits of f and g before using the rule.
NOTE 2
The rule is also valid for one-sided limits
and for limits at infinity or negative infinity.
 That is, ‘x → a’ can be replaced by any of
the symbols x → a+, x → a-, x → ∞, or x → - ∞.
NOTE 3
For the special case in which
f(a) = g(a) = 0, f’ and g’ are continuous,
and g’(a) ≠ 0, it is easy to see why
the rule is true.
NOTE 3
In fact, using the alternative form of
the definition of a derivative, we have:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
lim
'( ) '( )
lim lim
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
'( ) '( )
lim
( ) ( )
lim
( ) ( )
( )
lim
( )
x a
x a x a
x a
x a
x a
f x f a f x f a
f x f a x a x a
g x g a g x g a
g x g a
x a x a
f x f a
g x g a
f x
g x

 



 
 
  
 
 




NOTE 3
It is more difficult to prove
the general version of l’Hospital’s
Rule.
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
Find
 and
 Thus, we can apply l’Hospital’s Rule:
1
ln
lim
1
x
x
x
 
1 1
limln ln1 0 lim( 1) 0
x x
x x
 
   
1 1 1 1
(ln )
ln 1/ 1
lim lim lim lim 1
1 1
( 1)
x x x x
d
x
x x
dx
d
x x
x
dx
   
   


Example 1
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
Calculate
 We have and
 So, l’Hospital’s Rule gives:
2
lim
x
x
e
x

2
lim lim
x
x x
e x
 
   
2
2
( )
lim lim lim
2
( )
x
x x
x x x
d
e
e e
dx
d
x x
x
dx
  
 
Example 2
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
As ex → ∞ and 2x → ∞ as x → ∞, the limit
on the right side is also indeterminate.
However, a second application of l’Hospital’s
Rule gives:
2
lim lim lim
2 2
x x x
x x x
e e e
x x
  
   
Example 2
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
Calculate
 As ln x → ∞ and as x → ∞,
l’Hospital’s Rule applies:
 Notice that the limit on the right side
is now indeterminate of type .
3
ln
lim
x
x
x

3
x  
2/3
1
3
3
ln 1/
lim lim
x x
x x
x
x

 

0
0
Example 3
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
 However, instead of applying the rule
a second time as we did in Example 2,
we simplify the expression and see that
a second application is unnecessary:
2 / 3
1
3 3
3
ln 1/ 3
lim lim lim 0
x x x
x x
x
x x

  
  
Example 3
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
Find
 Noting that both tan x – x → 0 and x3 → 0
as x → 0, we use l’Hospital’s Rule:
3
0
tan
lim
x
x x
x


2
3 2
0 0
tan sec 1
lim lim
3
x x
x x x
x x
 
 

Example 4
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
 As the limit on the right side is still
indeterminate of type , we apply the rule
again:
Example 4
2 2
2
0 0
sec 1 2sec tan
lim lim
6
3
x x
x x x
x
x
 


0
0
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
 Since , we simplify the
calculation by writing:
2
0
limsec 1
x
x


2
2
0 0 0
0
2sec tan 1 tan
lim limsec lim
6 3
1 tan
lim
3
x x x
x
x x x
x
x x
x
x
  



Example 4
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
 We can evaluate this last limit either by
using l’Hospital’s Rule a third time or by
writing tan x as (sin x)/(cos x) and making
use of our knowledge of trigonometric limits.
Example 4
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
Putting together all the steps,
we get:
2
3 2
0 0
2
0
2
0 0
tan sec 1
lim lim
3
2sec tan
lim
6
1 tan 1 sec 1
lim lim
3 3 1 3
x x
x
x x
x x x
x x
x x
x
x x
x
 

 
 


  
Example 4
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
Find
 If we blindly attempted to use l-Hospital’s rule,
we would get:
sin
lim
1 cos
x
x
x

 
sin cos
lim lim
1 cos sin
x x
x x
x x
 
 
 
  

Example 5
This is wrong.
 Although the numerator sin x → 0 as x → π -,
notice that the denominator (1 - cos x) does not
approach 0.
 So, the rule can’t be applied here.
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE Example 5
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
The required limit is, in fact, easy to find
because the function is continuous at π
and the denominator is nonzero there:
sin sin 0
lim 0
1 cos 1 cos 1 ( 1)
x
x
x





  
   
Example 5
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
The example shows what can go wrong
if you use the rule without thinking.
 Other limits can be found using the rule, but
are more easily found by other methods.
 See Examples 3 and 5 in Section 2.3,
Example 3 in Section 2.6, and the discussion
at the beginning of the section.
L’HOSPITAL’S RULE
So, when evaluating any limit,
you should consider other methods
before using l’Hospital’s Rule.
INDETERMINATE PRODUCTS
If and (or -∞),
then it isn’t clear what the value
of , if any, will be.
lim ( ) 0
x a
f x

 lim ( )

 
x a
g x
lim ( ) ( )
x a
f x g x

INDETERMINATE PRODUCTS
There is a struggle between f and g.
 If f wins, the answer will be 0.
 If g wins, the answer will be ∞ (or -∞).
 Alternatively, there may be a compromise
where the answer is a finite nonzero number.
This kind of limit is called an indeterminate
form of type 0 . ∞.
 We can deal with it by writing the product fg
as a quotient:
 This converts the given limit into an indeterminate form
of type or ∞/∞, so that we can use l’Hospital’s Rule.
or
1/ 1/
f g
fg fg
g f
 
0
0
INDETERMINATE FORM—TYPE 0 . ∞
INDETERMINATE PRODUCTS
Evaluate
 The given limit is indeterminate because,
as x → 0+, the first factor (x) approaches 0,
whereas the second factor (ln x) approaches -∞.
0
lim ln
x
x x


Example 6
INDETERMINATE PRODUCTS
 Writing x = 1/(1/x), we have 1/x → ∞
as x → 0+.
 So, l’Hospital’s Rule gives:
Example 6
2
0 0 0
0
ln 1/
lim ln lim lim
1/ 1/
lim( ) 0
x x x
x
x x
x x
x x
x
  

  

 

  
In solving the example, another possible
option would have been to write:
 This gives an indeterminate form of the type 0/0.
 However, if we apply l’Hospital’s Rule, we get a more
complicated expression than the one we started with.
0 0
lim ln lim
1/ ln
x x
x
x x
x
 
 

INDETERMINATE PRODUCTS Note
INDETERMINATE PRODUCTS
In general, when we rewrite an
indeterminate product, we try to choose
the option that leads to the simpler limit.
Note
If and , then
the limit
is called an indeterminate form
of type ∞ - ∞.
lim ( )
x a
f x

  lim ( )
x a
g x

 
lim[ ( ) ( )]
x a
f x g x


INDETERMINATE FORM—TYPE ∞ - ∞
INDETERMINATE DIFFERENCES
Again, there is a contest between f and g.
 Will the answer be ∞ (f wins)?
 Will it be - ∞ (g wins)?
 Will they compromise on a finite number?
INDETERMINATE DIFFERENCES
To find out, we try to convert the difference
into a quotient (for instance, by using a
common denominator, rationalization, or
factoring out a common factor) so that
we have an indeterminate form of type
or ∞/∞.
0
0
INDETERMINATE DIFFERENCES
Compute
 First, notice that sec x → ∞ and tan x → ∞
as x → (π/2)
-
.
 So, the limit is indeterminate.
( / 2)
lim (sec tan )
x
x x
 


Example 7
INDETERMINATE DIFFERENCES
Here, we use a common denominator:
 Note that the use of l’Hospital’s Rule is justified
because 1 – sin x → 0 and cos x → 0 as x → (π/2)
-
.
( /2) ( /2)
( /2)
( /2)
1 sin
lim (sec tan ) lim
cos cos
1 sin
lim
cos
cos
lim 0
sin
x x
x
x
x
x x
x x
x
x
x
x
 


 


 


 
  
 
 



 

Example 7
INDETERMINATE POWERS
Several indeterminate forms arise from
the limit ( )
lim[ ( )]g x
x a
f x

0
0
1. lim ( ) 0 and lim ( ) 0 type0
2. lim ( ) and lim ( ) 0 type
3. lim ( ) 1 and lim ( ) type1
x a x a
x a x a
x a x a
f x g x
f x g x
f x g x
 
 

 
 
   
  
INDETERMINATE POWERS
Each of these three cases can be treated
in either of two ways.
 Taking the natural logarithm:
 Writing the function as an exponential:
( )
Let [ ( )] , then ln ( )ln ( )
g x
y f x y g x f x
 
( ) ( )ln ( )
[ ( )]g x g x f x
f x e

INDETERMINATE POWERS
Recall that both these methods were used
in differentiating such functions.
 In either method, we are led to the indeterminate
product g(x) ln f(x), which is of type 0 . ∞.
INDETERMINATE POWERS
Calculate
 First, notice that, as x → 0+, we have
1 + sin 4x → 1 and cot x → ∞.
 So, the given limit is indeterminate.
cot
0
lim(1 sin 4 ) x
x
x



Example 8
INDETERMINATE POWERS
Let y = (1 + sin 4x)cot x
Then, ln y = ln[(1 + sin 4x)cot x]
= cot x ln(1 + sin 4x)
Example 8
INDETERMINATE POWERS
So, l’Hospital’s Rule gives:
0 0
2
0
ln(1 sin 4 )
lim ln lim
tan
4cos4
1 sin 4
lim 4
sec
x x
x
x
y
x
x
x
x
 

 




 
Example 8
INDETERMINATE POWERS
So far, we have computed the limit of ln y.
However, what we want is the limit of y.
 To find this, we use the fact that y = eln y:
cot
0 0
ln 4
0
lim(1 sin 4 ) lim
lim
x
x x
y
x
x y
e e
 

 

 
 
Example 8
INDETERMINATE POWERS
Find
 Notice that this limit is indeterminate
since 0
x
= 0 for any x > 0 but x0 = 1
for any x ≠ 0.
0
lim x
x
x


Example 9
INDETERMINATE POWERS
We could proceed as in Example 8 or by
writing the function as an exponential:
xx = (eln x)x = ex ln x
 In Example 6, we used l’Hospital’s Rule
to show that
 Therefore,
0
lim ln 0
x
x x



ln 0
0 0
lim lim 1
x x x
x x
x e e
 
 
  
Example 9

Chap4_Sec4 (1).ppt

  • 1.
  • 2.
    4.4 Indeterminate Forms and L’Hospital’sRule APPLICATIONS OF DIFFERENTIATION In this section, we will learn: How to evaluate functions whose values cannot be found at certain points.
  • 3.
    Suppose we aretrying to analyze the behavior of the function Although F is not defined when x = 1, we need to know how F behaves near 1. ln ( ) 1 x F x x   INDETERMINATE FORMS
  • 4.
    In particular, wewould like to know the value of the limit 1 ln lim 1 x x x   Expression 1 INDETERMINATE FORMS
  • 5.
    In computing thislimit, we can’t apply Law 5 of limits (Section 2.3) because the limit of the denominator is 0.  In fact, although the limit in Expression 1 exists, its value is not obvious because both numerator and denominator approach 0 and is not defined. 0 0 INDETERMINATE FORMS
  • 6.
    INDETERMINATE FORM —TYPE0/0 In general, if we have a limit of the form where both f(x) → 0 and g(x) → 0 as x → a, then this limit may or may not exist. It is called an indeterminate form of type .  We met some limits of this type in Chapter 2. ( ) lim ( ) x a f x g x  0 0
  • 7.
    INDETERMINATE FORMS For rationalfunctions, we can cancel common factors: 2 2 1 1 1 ( 1) lim lim ( 1)( 1) 1 1 lim 1 2 x x x x x x x x x x x x            
  • 8.
    INDETERMINATE FORMS We useda geometric argument to show that: 0 sin lim 1 x x x  
  • 9.
    INDETERMINATE FORMS However, thesemethods do not work for limits such as Expression 1.  Hence, in this section, we introduce a systematic method, known as l’Hospital’s Rule, for the evaluation of indeterminate forms.
  • 10.
    INDETERMINATE FORMS Another situationin which a limit is not obvious occurs when we look for a horizontal asymptote of F and need to evaluate the limit ln lim 1 x x x   Expression 2
  • 11.
    INDETERMINATE FORMS It isn’tobvious how to evaluate this limit because both numerator and denominator become large as x → ∞. There is a struggle between the two.  If the numerator wins, the limit will be ∞.  If the denominator wins, the answer will be 0.  Alternatively, there may be some compromise— the answer may be some finite positive number.
  • 12.
    INDETERMINATE FORM —TYPE∞/∞ In general, if we have a limit of the form where both f(x) → ∞ (or -∞) and g(x) → ∞ (or -∞), then the limit may or may not exist. It is called an indeterminate form of type ∞/∞. ( ) lim ( ) x a f x g x 
  • 13.
    INDETERMINATE FORMS We sawin Section 2.6 that this type of limit can be evaluated for certain functions— including rational functions—by dividing the numerator and denominator by the highest power of x that occurs in the denominator.  For instance, 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 lim lim 1 2 0 2 2 1 2 x x x x x x           
  • 14.
    INDETERMINATE FORMS This method,though, does not work for limits such as Expression 2.  However, L’Hospital’s Rule also applies to this type of indeterminate form.
  • 15.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE Suppose fand g are differentiable and g’(x) ≠ 0 on an open interval I that contains a (except possibly at a). Suppose or that  In other words, we have an indeterminate form of type or ∞/∞. lim ( ) 0 and lim ( ) 0 x a x a f x g x     0 0 lim ( ) and lim ( ) x a x a f x g x      
  • 16.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE Then, if thelimit on the right exists (or is ∞ or - ∞). ( ) '( ) lim lim ( ) '( ) x a x a f x f x g x g x   
  • 17.
    NOTE 1 L’Hospital’s Rulesays that the limit of a quotient of functions is equal to the limit of the quotient of their derivatives—provided that the given conditions are satisfied.  It is especially important to verify the conditions regarding the limits of f and g before using the rule.
  • 18.
    NOTE 2 The ruleis also valid for one-sided limits and for limits at infinity or negative infinity.  That is, ‘x → a’ can be replaced by any of the symbols x → a+, x → a-, x → ∞, or x → - ∞.
  • 19.
    NOTE 3 For thespecial case in which f(a) = g(a) = 0, f’ and g’ are continuous, and g’(a) ≠ 0, it is easy to see why the rule is true.
  • 20.
    NOTE 3 In fact,using the alternative form of the definition of a derivative, we have: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) lim '( ) '( ) lim lim ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) '( ) '( ) lim ( ) ( ) lim ( ) ( ) ( ) lim ( ) x a x a x a x a x a x a f x f a f x f a f x f a x a x a g x g a g x g a g x g a x a x a f x f a g x g a f x g x                     
  • 21.
    NOTE 3 It ismore difficult to prove the general version of l’Hospital’s Rule.
  • 22.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE Find  and Thus, we can apply l’Hospital’s Rule: 1 ln lim 1 x x x   1 1 limln ln1 0 lim( 1) 0 x x x x       1 1 1 1 (ln ) ln 1/ 1 lim lim lim lim 1 1 1 ( 1) x x x x d x x x dx d x x x dx           Example 1
  • 23.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE Calculate  Wehave and  So, l’Hospital’s Rule gives: 2 lim x x e x  2 lim lim x x x e x       2 2 ( ) lim lim lim 2 ( ) x x x x x x d e e e dx d x x x dx      Example 2
  • 24.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE As ex→ ∞ and 2x → ∞ as x → ∞, the limit on the right side is also indeterminate. However, a second application of l’Hospital’s Rule gives: 2 lim lim lim 2 2 x x x x x x e e e x x        Example 2
  • 25.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE Calculate  Asln x → ∞ and as x → ∞, l’Hospital’s Rule applies:  Notice that the limit on the right side is now indeterminate of type . 3 ln lim x x x  3 x   2/3 1 3 3 ln 1/ lim lim x x x x x x     0 0 Example 3
  • 26.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE  However,instead of applying the rule a second time as we did in Example 2, we simplify the expression and see that a second application is unnecessary: 2 / 3 1 3 3 3 ln 1/ 3 lim lim lim 0 x x x x x x x x        Example 3
  • 27.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE Find  Notingthat both tan x – x → 0 and x3 → 0 as x → 0, we use l’Hospital’s Rule: 3 0 tan lim x x x x   2 3 2 0 0 tan sec 1 lim lim 3 x x x x x x x      Example 4
  • 28.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE  Asthe limit on the right side is still indeterminate of type , we apply the rule again: Example 4 2 2 2 0 0 sec 1 2sec tan lim lim 6 3 x x x x x x x     0 0
  • 29.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE  Since, we simplify the calculation by writing: 2 0 limsec 1 x x   2 2 0 0 0 0 2sec tan 1 tan lim limsec lim 6 3 1 tan lim 3 x x x x x x x x x x x x       Example 4
  • 30.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE  Wecan evaluate this last limit either by using l’Hospital’s Rule a third time or by writing tan x as (sin x)/(cos x) and making use of our knowledge of trigonometric limits. Example 4
  • 31.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE Putting togetherall the steps, we get: 2 3 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 tan sec 1 lim lim 3 2sec tan lim 6 1 tan 1 sec 1 lim lim 3 3 1 3 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x             Example 4
  • 32.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE Find  Ifwe blindly attempted to use l-Hospital’s rule, we would get: sin lim 1 cos x x x    sin cos lim lim 1 cos sin x x x x x x           Example 5
  • 33.
    This is wrong. Although the numerator sin x → 0 as x → π -, notice that the denominator (1 - cos x) does not approach 0.  So, the rule can’t be applied here. L’HOSPITAL’S RULE Example 5
  • 34.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE The requiredlimit is, in fact, easy to find because the function is continuous at π and the denominator is nonzero there: sin sin 0 lim 0 1 cos 1 cos 1 ( 1) x x x             Example 5
  • 35.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE The exampleshows what can go wrong if you use the rule without thinking.  Other limits can be found using the rule, but are more easily found by other methods.  See Examples 3 and 5 in Section 2.3, Example 3 in Section 2.6, and the discussion at the beginning of the section.
  • 36.
    L’HOSPITAL’S RULE So, whenevaluating any limit, you should consider other methods before using l’Hospital’s Rule.
  • 37.
    INDETERMINATE PRODUCTS If and(or -∞), then it isn’t clear what the value of , if any, will be. lim ( ) 0 x a f x   lim ( )    x a g x lim ( ) ( ) x a f x g x 
  • 38.
    INDETERMINATE PRODUCTS There isa struggle between f and g.  If f wins, the answer will be 0.  If g wins, the answer will be ∞ (or -∞).  Alternatively, there may be a compromise where the answer is a finite nonzero number.
  • 39.
    This kind oflimit is called an indeterminate form of type 0 . ∞.  We can deal with it by writing the product fg as a quotient:  This converts the given limit into an indeterminate form of type or ∞/∞, so that we can use l’Hospital’s Rule. or 1/ 1/ f g fg fg g f   0 0 INDETERMINATE FORM—TYPE 0 . ∞
  • 40.
    INDETERMINATE PRODUCTS Evaluate  Thegiven limit is indeterminate because, as x → 0+, the first factor (x) approaches 0, whereas the second factor (ln x) approaches -∞. 0 lim ln x x x   Example 6
  • 41.
    INDETERMINATE PRODUCTS  Writingx = 1/(1/x), we have 1/x → ∞ as x → 0+.  So, l’Hospital’s Rule gives: Example 6 2 0 0 0 0 ln 1/ lim ln lim lim 1/ 1/ lim( ) 0 x x x x x x x x x x x              
  • 42.
    In solving theexample, another possible option would have been to write:  This gives an indeterminate form of the type 0/0.  However, if we apply l’Hospital’s Rule, we get a more complicated expression than the one we started with. 0 0 lim ln lim 1/ ln x x x x x x      INDETERMINATE PRODUCTS Note
  • 43.
    INDETERMINATE PRODUCTS In general,when we rewrite an indeterminate product, we try to choose the option that leads to the simpler limit. Note
  • 44.
    If and ,then the limit is called an indeterminate form of type ∞ - ∞. lim ( ) x a f x    lim ( ) x a g x    lim[ ( ) ( )] x a f x g x   INDETERMINATE FORM—TYPE ∞ - ∞
  • 45.
    INDETERMINATE DIFFERENCES Again, thereis a contest between f and g.  Will the answer be ∞ (f wins)?  Will it be - ∞ (g wins)?  Will they compromise on a finite number?
  • 46.
    INDETERMINATE DIFFERENCES To findout, we try to convert the difference into a quotient (for instance, by using a common denominator, rationalization, or factoring out a common factor) so that we have an indeterminate form of type or ∞/∞. 0 0
  • 47.
    INDETERMINATE DIFFERENCES Compute  First,notice that sec x → ∞ and tan x → ∞ as x → (π/2) - .  So, the limit is indeterminate. ( / 2) lim (sec tan ) x x x     Example 7
  • 48.
    INDETERMINATE DIFFERENCES Here, weuse a common denominator:  Note that the use of l’Hospital’s Rule is justified because 1 – sin x → 0 and cos x → 0 as x → (π/2) - . ( /2) ( /2) ( /2) ( /2) 1 sin lim (sec tan ) lim cos cos 1 sin lim cos cos lim 0 sin x x x x x x x x x x x x x                            Example 7
  • 49.
    INDETERMINATE POWERS Several indeterminateforms arise from the limit ( ) lim[ ( )]g x x a f x  0 0 1. lim ( ) 0 and lim ( ) 0 type0 2. lim ( ) and lim ( ) 0 type 3. lim ( ) 1 and lim ( ) type1 x a x a x a x a x a x a f x g x f x g x f x g x                
  • 50.
    INDETERMINATE POWERS Each ofthese three cases can be treated in either of two ways.  Taking the natural logarithm:  Writing the function as an exponential: ( ) Let [ ( )] , then ln ( )ln ( ) g x y f x y g x f x   ( ) ( )ln ( ) [ ( )]g x g x f x f x e 
  • 51.
    INDETERMINATE POWERS Recall thatboth these methods were used in differentiating such functions.  In either method, we are led to the indeterminate product g(x) ln f(x), which is of type 0 . ∞.
  • 52.
    INDETERMINATE POWERS Calculate  First,notice that, as x → 0+, we have 1 + sin 4x → 1 and cot x → ∞.  So, the given limit is indeterminate. cot 0 lim(1 sin 4 ) x x x    Example 8
  • 53.
    INDETERMINATE POWERS Let y= (1 + sin 4x)cot x Then, ln y = ln[(1 + sin 4x)cot x] = cot x ln(1 + sin 4x) Example 8
  • 54.
    INDETERMINATE POWERS So, l’Hospital’sRule gives: 0 0 2 0 ln(1 sin 4 ) lim ln lim tan 4cos4 1 sin 4 lim 4 sec x x x x y x x x x            Example 8
  • 55.
    INDETERMINATE POWERS So far,we have computed the limit of ln y. However, what we want is the limit of y.  To find this, we use the fact that y = eln y: cot 0 0 ln 4 0 lim(1 sin 4 ) lim lim x x x y x x y e e           Example 8
  • 56.
    INDETERMINATE POWERS Find  Noticethat this limit is indeterminate since 0 x = 0 for any x > 0 but x0 = 1 for any x ≠ 0. 0 lim x x x   Example 9
  • 57.
    INDETERMINATE POWERS We couldproceed as in Example 8 or by writing the function as an exponential: xx = (eln x)x = ex ln x  In Example 6, we used l’Hospital’s Rule to show that  Therefore, 0 lim ln 0 x x x    ln 0 0 0 lim lim 1 x x x x x x e e        Example 9