CCFFDD AANNAALLYYSSIISS OOFF 
CCEENNTTRRIIFFUUGGAALL PPUUMMPP 
By: Dipak Pandey 10BME025 
Pavan Patel 10BME031 
Pujan Shah 10BME039 
Guided By: Prof. S.V. Jain
OOuuttlliinnee ooff PPrreesseennttaattiioonn 
• Introduction 
• Objectives of Present Studies 
• Solid and Fluid Model 
• Meshing 
• Result and Discussion 
• Grid In-dependency 
• Cavitation Analysis
OObbjjeeccttiivvee 
• CFD analysis of Centrifugal Pump in pump mode for 
different flow conditions in Fluent and Ansys CFX. 
• To plot the characteristics curves and compare it with the 
model testing results. 
• CFD analysis of Centrifugal Pump in pump mode with 
cavitation.
IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn 
Centrifugal Pump 
• Due to centrifugal action pressure is developed and it will lift 
the fluid to certain height 
• It is widely used in industry as well as domestic level
CCaavviittaattiioonn iinn ppuummpp 
• Cavitation can be define as the breakdown of a liquid 
medium under very low pressures into vapour 
Phase diagram of water 
Pressure plot for impeller section
SSppeecciiffiiccaattiioonn ooff PPuummpp 
Parameter Value 
Rated Head 15 m 
Discharge 1500 LPM 
Speed 1500 RPM 
Power 4.5 kW 
Suction flange 
dia. 75 mm 
Delivery flange 
dia. 100 mm 
Impeller dia. 250 mm 
Type Medium speed, Centrifugal, Volute 
casing Pump taken for CFD Analysis
(Source- Lubi Pumps)
Solid MMooddeell ooff CCaassiinngg aanndd IImmppeelllleerr
CCoommppuuttaattiioonnaall DDoommaaiinn
MMeesshhiinngg Type Tetrahedral Grid 
Spacing 2mm 
No. of Elements in Casing 11,55,478 
No. of elements in Impeller 8,10,301 
Total No. of Elements 19,65,779 
Data for mesh of interval 2 mm 
Spacing Elements 
10 34588 
5 178366 
3 689111 
2.7 942615 
2.5 1111607 
2 1965779 
Mesh of interval 2 mm in Gambit
BBoouunnddaarryy CCoonnddiittiioonnss 
Boundary Condition 
Mass flow (kg/s) Po given (Pa) 
22 170000 
25 164000 
26 162000 
28 158000 
29 152000 
32 130000 
34 103000 
Performance curves for Pump
PPrreessssuurree PPlloottss
VVeelloocciittyy PPlloott
GGrriidd IInnddeeppeennddeennccyy 
Grid Independency 
Spacing Elements Max Efficiency Deviation 
10 34588 82.63407767 -7.409788226 
5 178366 85.44033325 -4.265422058 
3 689111 88.20820798 -1.16406104 
2.7 942615 89.11992282 -0.142498594 
2.5 1111607 88.52044789 -0.81420102 
2 1965779 89.24709868 0
VVaappoouurr vvoolluummee ffrraaccttiioonn 
22 kg/s Part load 29 kg/s BEP 34 kg/s Overload
PPrreessssuurree PPlloott CCoommppaarriissoonn
PPeerrffoorrmmaannccee CCuurrvveess 
Patel and Ramakrishnan [1]
PPeerrffoorrmmaannccee CCuurrvveess 
Patel and Ramakrishnan [1]
PPeerrffoorrmmaannccee CCuurrvveess 
Patel and Ramakrishnan [1]
CCoonncclluussiioonnss 
• For backward curved vanes centrifugal pump increase in mass flow rate Head 
decreases, Input and Output power increases 
• Efficiency first increases with discharge, reach maximum efficiency at rated 
discharge and then decreases 
• Input power required in CFD is less than model testing because leakage and 
friction loss are not considered. 
• Maximum efficiency is found at 0.029 m3/s which is 89.24%. 
• In cavitation mode efficiency is 66.95% 
• Due to cavitation efficiency of pump reduces because for pumping of vapour 
more power is required 
• Also due to cavitation head developed by pump is less because vapour has less 
density than water
RReeffeerreenncceess 
1. Patel K and Ramakrishnan N, “CFD Analysis of Mixed 
Flow Pump”
TThhaannkk YYoouu

Cfd analysis of_centrifugal_pump