This case study examines the use of glass fiber reinforced concrete (GFRC). Tests were conducted on concrete with varying amounts of glass fiber (0-3% by weight) to determine compressive and flexural strength properties. The 7-day and 28-day compressive strength generally increased as the glass fiber content increased from 0-1%, with strengths up to 27.8% higher than normal concrete. Flexural strength also improved with the addition of glass fibers. The glass fibers improved the concrete's strength properties by holding the material together and reducing cracking. In conclusion, GFRC showed 20-25% increases in compressive, flexural, and splitting tensile strengths compared to normal concrete, demonstrating its potential for use in impact

1. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 09 Issue: 03 | Mar 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2110
Case Study on Glass Fibre Reinforced Concrete
Raj Vardhan Yadav1, Rana Pratap2, Aditya Kumar Pandey3, Satya Narayan Bajpai4,
Abhishek Tiwari5, Shubhendu Mishra6
1UG Student of civil engineering, G.I.T.M. Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
2UG Student of civil engineering, G.I.T.M. Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
3UG Student of civil engineering, G.I.T.M. Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
4UG Student of civil engineering, G.I.T.M. Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
5UG Student of civil engineering, G.I.T.M. Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
6Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, G.I.T.M. Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - Concrete is one of the most generally perceived
advancement material generally conveyed by using locally
available fixings. The advancementofcementhasachievedthe
fundamental requirement for addedsubstancesbothsynthetic
and mineral to work on the presentation of cement. Glassfiber
supported concrete (GRC) is amaterialmadeofa cementitious
lattice made out of concrete, sand, water and admixtures, in
which short length glass filaments are scattered. It has been
broadly utilized in the development business for non-
underlying components, as façade boards, funneling and
channels. GRC offers many benefits, for example, being
lightweight, imperviousness to fire, great appearance and
strength. In this concentrate being investigated tests for
concrete with glass fibre and without glass fibre are directed
to demonstrate the distinctions in compressive strength and
flexural strength by utilizing blocks of shifting sizes.. The
principle point of the review is to concentrate on the impactof
glass fibre in the substantial. Glass fibre has the high elasticity
and fireproof properties accordingly decreasingthedeficiency
of harm during fire mishaps. The expansion of these filaments
into cement can drastically expand the compressive strength,
rigidity and split elasticity of the substantial. In this review,
tests have accomplished for the substantial with glass fibre of
0.5%, 1%, 2% and 3% of concrete by adding as an admixture.
Key Words: Glass fibre, Eco- friendly, tensile strength,
compressive strength, split tensile strength.
1. INTRODUCTION
Glass Fibre Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) or (GRC) is a kindof
fibre supported concrete. Glass fibre cements are chiefly
utilized in outside building façadeboardsandasengineering
precast cement. This material is generally excellent in
making shapes on the facade of any structure and it is less
thick than steel. GFRC is a type of substantial thatutilizations
fine sand, concrete, polymer (generally an acrylic polymer),
water, different admixtures and antacid safe glass filaments.
Many blend plans are unreservedly accessible on different
sites, yet all share likenesses in fixing extents. Glass fibre
developed cementitious composites have been developed
generally for the advancement of pitiful sheet parts, with a
paste or mortar organization,and~5%fibrecontent.Various
applications have been considered, either by making
supporting bars with diligent glass fibres consolidated and
impregnated with plastics, or by makingpracticallyidentical
short, rigid units, impregnated with epoxy, to be dissipated
in the significant during mixing. Glass strands are conveyed
in a cycle in which fluid glass is drawn in the kind of
filaments, through the lower a piece of a warmed platinum
tank or bushing. Regularly, 204 filaments are drawn
simultaneously and they concrete while cooling outside the
warmed tank; they are then accumulated on a drum into a
strand including the 204 filaments. Prior to winding, the
filaments are covered with an assessing which shields the
strands against environment and scratched region impacts,
as well as confining them together in the strand .The
utilization of concrete cement is restricted because of the
attributes of weak disappointment;thiscanbeoverwhelmed
by the consideration of a modest quantity of short and
arbitrarily appropriated filaments like steel, glass,
engineered and regular. Such concrete can be polished
where there is a shortcoming of cement, for example, less
solidness, high shrinkage breaking, and so on Concretehasa
lacks of few like low elasticity, low post breaking limit, and
weakness, exceptionally permeable,powerlesstocompound
and ecological assault. The above lacks of plain cement are
defeated in the new materials which have exceptional
qualities, which make them profoundly helpless to any
climate.
Fibre Reinforced concrete is one of themandreasonably one
more composite material in which concrete is upheld with
short discrete (length up to 35 mm), reliably conveyed
strands so it will additionally foster many Engineering
properties, for instance,flexural strength,shearstrength and
insurance from shortcoming, influence and crash
temperature and shrinkage breaks. Strands lengths up to35
mm are used in shower applications and 25 mm length
premix applications. Glass fibre has high unbending nature
(2-4 GPa) and adaptable modulus (70-80 GPa), feeble
tension strain credits (2.5-4.8 %extendingatbreak)andlow
downer at room temperature. Glass fibres are for the most
part round and straight with widths of 0.005 to 0.015 mm.
They can be bundled with bunch width of 1.3 mm.

2. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 09 Issue: 03 | Mar 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2111
The glass filaments are the fundamental components that
convey the heap, while the encased framework keeps the
strands in the favoured position and heading. The medium
works with move of the heap on the strands, and safeguards
them from the harm because of climate. Glass strandscanbe
coordinated into the lattice either in steady or sporadic
lengths. The most boundless shapewhereinglass fibresbuilt
up composites are utilized in underlying applications is
known as cover. This structure is accomplished by uniting
fine fibre layers and a lattice into the ideal size.Thedirection
of fibre in each layer, and the stacking succession of the
layers, can be utilized to create a scope of mechanical
properties of the composite materials.
1.1 OBJECTIVE OF PAPER.
• To decide compressive strength of GFRC
• To look at strength of GFRC at various level of glass fibre.
• To decide functionality of GFRC
1.2 Present Investigation
The reason for this exploration is to investigate the
compressive strength, split-elasticity and flexural strength
properties of cement built up with short discrete strands.
The review was done on M-20 grade concrete the size of
glass strands utilized was 30mm and the fibre content was
differed from 0% to 0.3% of the absolute weight of cement.
In concentrating on the over three properties no admixture
was utilized. Likewise the impact of glass fibre on concrete
and substantial tiles was concentrated on whose fibre
content was differed from 0% to 0.7% of the weight of
cement. Concrete and cement a substantial tile which are
utilized at different places and is of viable use.
2. Case Study
2.1 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH:-
Out of various tests led to the strong, this is the most
outrageous fundamental which gives an idea with respect to
all of the characteristics of concrete. By this single test one
can decide that whether Concreting has been finished
properly or not. For strong shape test two kinds of models
either 3D squares of 15 cm X 15 cm X 15 cm or 10cm X 10 cm
x 10 cm depending on the proportion of absolute are used.
For most of the works cubical molds of size 15 cm x 15cm x
15 cm are ordinarily used.Theglassstrandsareincorporated
at the pace of 0.5%, 1%, 2% and 3%of concrete.Thisstrongis
poured in the form and modified truly so as not to have any
voids. Following 24 hours these molds are emptied and test
models are set in water for restoring. These models are
attempted by pressure testing machine following 7 days
restoring or 28 days restoring. Trouble should be associated
consistently at the pace of 140 kg/cm2 each second till the
Specimens misfires. Load at the mistake segregated by zone
of model gives the compressive nature of concrete.
Compressive Strength (Mpa) = Failure load/Cross sectional
region.
The Table-I gives us an audit on the compressive strength
values estimated for each of the five substantial sorts at
surrounding conditions. It should be visible that the early
strength (7 days) of GFRC4 concrete has shown 27.6%, and
later strength (28 days) has shown 27.8% expansion in
compressive strengththancustomarycement.Theexpansion
of filamentsnowandthenhaveshowncomparableoutcomes,
when 1% and 1.5% expansion of strands to concrete has
shown comparable early strength and a little variety in their
later strength too. The strands set in the grid play had a
significant impact in diminishing the breaks by holding the
framework and ultimately expanding the compressive
strength limit of the substantial.
Table 2.1.1: Compressive Strength Results.
Trial 7 Day (Mpa) 28 Day (Mpa)
CC 24.12 32.36
GFRC 1 28.88 42.22
GFRC 2 31.11 43.55
GFRC 3 31.11 44.44
GFRC 4 33.33 44.88
Compressive Strength of concrete is defined as the
Characteristic strength
Why Do We Test At 7, 14 & 28 Days?
Concrete is a macro content with Sand, Cement, & Coarse
aggregate as its micro ingredient (Mix Ratio) and gains its
100% strength over time at the hardened state.
2.2 CONCRETE STRENGTH OVERTIME:-
Table 2.2.1: Compressive Strength of concrete is defined
as the Characteristic strength of 150mm size concrete
cubes tested at 28 days.
DAYS AFTER
CASTING
STRENGTH GAIN
DAYS AFTER CASTING
STRENGTH GAIN
Day 1 16%
Day 3 40%
Day 7 65%
Day 14 90%
Day 28 99%
As you can see the concrete gains its strength rapidly
till 7th & 14th Days. Then gradually increases from there.
So we can’t predict the strength until the concrete comes to
that stable state.

3. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 09 Issue: 03 | Mar 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2112
3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The 7 days compressive strength was considered and the
upsides of 3 examples contemplated are shown in the plain
form. Table 3.1 shows theinformationof7days compressive
strength got. Table 3.1 allows the multi day compressive
strength of cement with most extreme ostensible size of
totals 20mm.The 7 days compressive strength was likewise
plotted Fig.3.1 by taking the normal of this three qualities
generally speaking an expansioninthecompressivestrength
was seen with expansion of strands..
Table 3.1: 7days compressive strength of concrete
Serial
number
Without
fibre
0.1%
fibre
0.2% 0.3%
1 16.89 17.77 21.33 22.22
2 16.44 17.33 20.88 22.67
3 16.44 17.33 21.33 23.11
(Fig 3.1)
Effect of Glass fibers on 7 day compressive strength
The 28 days compressive strength was considered and the
upsides of 3 examples examined are shown in the even
structure. Table 3.2 shows the information of 28 days
compressive strength acquired. Table 2 allows the 28 days
compressive strength ofcement withgreatestostensiblesize
of totals 20mm.The 28 days compressive strength was
likewise plotted Fig3 by taking the normal of this three
qualities generallyspeaking anexpansioninthecompressive
strength was seen with expansion of filaments
Table 3.2: 28 days compressive strength of concrete
Serial
number
Without
fibre
0.1% 0.2% 0.3%
1 25.33 28 28.88 30.22
2 25.77 31 28.88 28.88
3 25.33 28 31 30.66
(Fig 3.2)
Effect of Glass fibers on 28 day compressive strength
4. CONCLUSION
However the underlying expense ishighthegeneral expense
is incredibly diminished due to the great properties of fibre
supported concrete. Theglass fibrebuiltupconcreteshowed
just about 20 to 25 % increment in compressive strength,
flexural and split elasticity as contrasted and 28 days
compressive strength of plainconcrete.Whiletowork on the
sturdiness from the part of corrosive assaults on concrete
the utilization of AR glass strands had shown greatoutcome.
Thus, the GFRC can be utilized for impact opposing designs,
dams, pressure driven structures.
1. Glass filaments lose an extent of their flawless strength
when put in a Portland concrete climate. AR strands have a
better presentation than different sorts, and are probably
going to hold long haul elastic qualitiesofaround1000-1200
N/mm2 at surrounding temperatures in a concrete climate
[7].
2. This incorporates not just an appraisal of fibre content
and grid strength, yet additionally such subtleties as fibre
dispersion, direction, and viability of holding. Conceivable
assembling or materials deficiencies can likewise be
analyzed. Likewise it shows that the MOR and LOP in drying
condition test have higher outcome than wet condition
around (1-5) MN/m2 difference [8].
3. The primary distinction among dewatered and non-
dewatered GRC is the distinction in thickness which makes
two impacts. First and foremost albeit the fibre content by
weight is something very similar, the higher thickness of the
dewatered board gives a higher fibre volume portion giving
higher qualities. Also the dewatered board has better
compaction and diminished porosity giving better
fibre/framework bond strength [9].
4. At the point when concrete, mortar or cement is sprinkled
or in any case carried into contact with window glass,
drawing happens. This is on the grounds that the salt in
concrete goes after a portion of the silicates that are utilized
in glass fabricate. The stock utilized in making glass strands

4. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 09 Issue: 03 | Mar 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2113
has preferable antacid obstruction over window glass since
zirconia is utilized as one of the constituents [10].
5. This research study has demonstrated that glass fibre-
built up epoxy composites could be fabricated by hand lay-
up strategy at various level of fibre stacking and fibre
direction.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The lead creator might want to say thanks to A.P.J Kalam
Technical, Lucknow, U.P for the stage to direct this
exploration. The creators would likewise appreciate a
portion of the writings that have given exhaustive
foundation of glass fibre.
REFERENCES
[1] An Avinash Gornale, B S. Ibrahim Quadri and C Syed
Hussaini (2012), Strength part of Glass fibre built up
concrete, International diary of Scientific and Engineering
research, vol. 3 , issue 7.
[2] A Dr. Srinivasan Rao, B Chandra Mouli K. also, C Dr. T.
Seshadri Sekhar (2012), Durability studies on Glass Fibre
Reinforced Concrete, International Journal of structural
designing science, vol.1, no-1-2.
[3] A G. Jyothi Kumari, B P. Jagannadha Rao and C M. V.
Seshagiri Rao (2013), Behavior of cement footers built up
with glass fibre supported polymer pads, global diary of
exploration in designing and innovation, Vol.2, Issue 09.
[4] A Kavita S. Kene, B Vikrant S. Vairagade and C Satish
Sathawane (2012), Experimental review on conduct of steel
and glass fibre Reinforced substantial composite, Bonfring
International Journal of Industrial Engineering and
Management studies, Vol. 2, No-4
[5] A S. H Alsayed, B Y.A. Al-Salloum and C T. H. Almusallam
(2001), Performance of glass fibre built up plastic bars as a
supporting material for substantial designs, Journal of
Science and Technology.
[6] A Yogesh Murthy, B Apoorv Sharda and C Gourav Jain
(2012), Performance of glass fibre built up concrete,
International diary of designing and imaginativeinnovation,
vol.1, issue 6.
[7] Majumdar, A.J. (1974), "The joboftheconnectionpointin
glass fibre supported concrete", Building Research
Establishment, Published 1974, Current Paper (cp 57-74).
[8] R .N. Swamy, "Testing and Test Methods of Fibre Cement
Composites", Published 1978, (pp 42-43).
[9] M.W. Fordyce and R.G. Wodehouse,"GRCandstructures",
Published First Edition 1983.
[10] M. Levitt 1997 "Substantial materials issues and
arrangements", "GRC and Alkali-Glass response", First
Edition 1997, (pp 22-24).
BIOGRAPHIES