 What is cartilage?


 Cartilage function.


 Damaged Cartilage has limited
 capacity for self-repair.

 Causes for cartilage damage:              Dr Brian A Rothbart, 2010
   Trauma
   Degenerative disease e.g. Arthritis .
 Arthritis is a joint inflammation disorder.
 Inflammation happens due to
  cartilage degradation.
 No cure
 All treatments are to decrease
  symptoms or delay progress.
 Cartilage degradation may happens
  due to collagen degradation.
  o Collagen puts the ECM
     together.
 17.1% of the disabilities in USA because of arthritis.
  [Healthy people]
 350 million people
  worldwide have arthritis.
 37 million people in USA.
                             wrongdiagnosis.com

 Health care: $81 billion annually in USA. abcnews.go.com
 Using chondrocytes cells for cartilage repair.
 Chondrocytes are cells that build and maintain cartilage.
 Isolating and seeding of chondrocytes cells found from porcine
  knees of patient.
 The cells are mature differentiated chondrocytes or
  osteochondral progenitor cells, such as MSCs. (Huckle, et al. 2003)



                               Chondrocytes: the cells that build and
                               maintain cartilage

                                  http://saveyourself.ca/articles/shorts/2009-05-26-
                                  carticel-good-news-bad-news.php
 Isolating and seeding of chondrocytes: The cartilage tissue
  was harvested from porcine knees.

 Preparation of protein-loaded chitosan microsphere:
  Solution mixed with FITC-BSA (fluorescein isothiocyanate
  bovine serum albumin) or TGF-β1(transforming growth factor
  –beta1).

 Preparation of chitosan scaffold containing MS-TGF

 SEM (scanning electron microscopy) measurement:-
  Chondrocytes were growing on the scaffold.
            ( Sung Eun Kim, et al. 2006)
 Chitosan microsphere loaded with proteins, BSA (bovine
  serum albumin) and TGF (transforming growth factor)in
  the presence of TPP (Thiamine pyrophosphate)
 The size of microspheres was reduced by the protein.
 Diffusion of TPP into microspheres is time dependent and
  critical to maintain the shape of microsphere .
 The cross-linking time should be longer than 20 min.
                                         (Sung Eun Kim, et al. 2006)
Results cont’d
In vitro protein release from
  microspheres:
 The proteins, BSA (bovine serum
    albumin) and TGF (transforming
    growth factor) were released in
    biphasic manner.
   implies that initially the rate of
    release is fast and later the release is
    slower.
   BSA and TGF released at initial
    phase, 48.8% and 14.5% respectively.
   Release rate of TGF-beta 1 from                 Release profiles of FITC–
    microspheres was lower than BSA                 BSA (0) and TGF-β1 from
    over the whole experiment                       chitosan microspheres .
    BSA (90.1%) released within 5 days.
   Release amount of TGF- beta1 only
    44.9% for 7 days.      ( Sung Eun Kim, et al.
                            2006)
Results cont’d
Chondrocytes growth on chitosan scaffolds without
microsphere-TGF
  SEM (scanning electron microscopy) used for evaluation cell
   morphology and proliferation.
  After 4 days, chondrocytes were present in the superficial area of the
   scaffold and maintain a spherical morphology.
  After 7 days, chondrocytes were slightly proliferated without spreading.




                                                     ( Sung Eun Kim, et al.
                                                     2006)


Scanning electron micrographs of chondrocytes grown on chitosan scaffold for (a)
4 days and (b) 7 days after seeding.
Results cont’d


After 4 days , chondrocytes cells grow on chitosan scaffold
with MS-TGF, there was a significant increase in the number.
After 7 days , chondrocytes were proliferated and open pores
of scaffold occupied by the numbers of aggregates, composed
of several chondrocytes. ( Sung Eun Kim, et al. 2006)




Scanning electron micrographs of chondrocytes grown on chitosan scaffold, seeded with
chitosan microsphere containing TGF-β1. (a) Four days after seeding; the cells were
merged to form large aggregates adherent to the scaffold. (b) Magnified view of a
representative chondrocyte grown for 4 days. (c) Seven days after seeding
 TGF-β1, has promote the protein synthesis and cell
  proliferation in articular cartilage. It acts as an
  autocrine regulator of chondrocytes.
 It also inhibits the actions of matrix metalloproteinase
  that play an important role in the digestion of
  the ECM in both normal and degenerative articular
  cartilage.   ( Sung Eun Kim, et al. 2006).
 Using MSCs stem cells for cartilage repair.
 Implant MSCs encapsulated collagen based scaffold.
 Stem cells found in all multi cellular organisms. They
  can renew themselves and differentiate to different cell
  types.
 Two types of stem cells:
   Embryonic stem cells
   Adult stem cells
 Adult stem cells are undifferentiated cells that are
 found in bone morrow, blood stream, retina and
 cornea of the eyes. (Bigaria, et. al 2006)




                             http://www.stemcellresearch.org/testimony/prentice.h
                             tm
 MSCs is found in the bone marrow.
 MSCs can differentiate to many
  different cell types: (Bobis, et. al 2006)
   Chondrocytes ( Cartilage)
   Osteoblasts (Bone)
   Myocytes (Muscle)
 MSCs don’t trigger the immune
  response. (Bonfield, et. al 2010)
 MSCs are immunosuppression. (Patel, et. al 2008)
 Implanting MSCs in a rabbit cartilage defect.
 MSCs encapsulated in collagen hydrogel (CH) and collagen
  alginate hydrogel (CAH) scaffolds.
 The scaffold encapsulated in five groups of champers:
      CH + TGF-Beta1
      CH - TGF-Beta1
      CAH + TGF-Beta1
      CAH - TGF-Beta1
      MSCs without any scaffolds nor growth factors

 The champers implanted in the rabbits for 8 weeks.


 After 8m weeks, the rabbits sacrificed and champers collected.
 MSCs without any scaffolds, no tissue found.

HE staining of sectioned tissue inside diffusion
chamber showed:

(A) CH –TGF-b1 group showed cells of
   round shape and high cell density.

(B) CAH –TGF-b1 group showed lower
    cell density of round shape.



(C) CH +TGF-b1 group showed cells of
 round shape and high cell density.

(D) CAH +TGF-b1 group showed cells of
   round shape and high cell density.
Immunohistochemical examination of sectioned tissue inside diffusion
  chamber showed:

 (A, E) CH –TGF-b1 group showed intense positive staining of type II collagen.


 (B, F): CAH –TGF-b1 group showed less positive staining of type II collagen.


 (C, G) CH +TGF-b1 group showed highly positive staining of type II collagen.


 (D, H) CAH +TGF-b1 group showed highly positive staining of type II collagen.
 MSCs can differentiate to chondrocytes without
 interact with body fluids.

 A scaffold must be used for chondrogenesis to happen.


 CH support more chondrogenesis than CAH.


 TGF-b1 is important for MSCs differentiation.
 Tissue engineered chondrocytes can be used to treat cartilage
  damage.
 MSCs can be used to treat cartilage damage:
    Reduce the cost of healthcare for arthritis patients.
    Give arthritis patients definitive treatment.
    Open the way to treat other diseases.
 Limitation:
    TGF-β1 appears to be a powerful molecule to repair
     damaged cartilage. But high dose of intra-articular injection may
     induce chemotaxis and activation of inflammatory
     cells, resulting in fibrosis and osteophyte formation in cartilage
     defects.
    Number of surgeries that should be done to cover all the affected
     areas.
 Which better to use chondrocytes or MSCs?


 Do you think using these methods will be
 effective to treat arthritis?
 Bagaria, V., et al., Stem cells in orthopedics: current concepts and possible future
    applications. Indian J Med Sci, 2006. 60(4): p. 162-9.
   Bobis, S., D. Jarocha, and M. Majka, Mesenchymal stem cells: characteristics and
    clinical applications. Folia Histochem Cytobiol, 2006. 44(4): p. 215-30.
   Bonfield, T.L., et al., Defining human mesenchymal stem cell efficacy in vivo. J
    Inflamm (Lond), 2010. 7: p. 51.
   Patel, S.A., et al., Immunological properties of mesenchymal stem cells and clinical
    implications. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz), 2008. 56(1): p. 1-8.
   Zheng, L., et al., Chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells induced by
    collagen-based hydrogel: an in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2010. 93(2): p.
    783-92.
    sung eun kim , et al.Porous chitson scaffold containing microspheres loaded with
    transforming growth factors-beta1: implications for cartilage tissue engineering:
    Biomedical Research Center, 19 May 2003.
   Huckle, et al. Differentiated chondrocytes for cartilage tissue engineering: 2003.

Cartilage Tissue Engineering

  • 2.
     What iscartilage?  Cartilage function.  Damaged Cartilage has limited capacity for self-repair.  Causes for cartilage damage: Dr Brian A Rothbart, 2010  Trauma  Degenerative disease e.g. Arthritis .
  • 3.
     Arthritis isa joint inflammation disorder.  Inflammation happens due to cartilage degradation.  No cure  All treatments are to decrease symptoms or delay progress.  Cartilage degradation may happens due to collagen degradation. o Collagen puts the ECM together.
  • 4.
     17.1% ofthe disabilities in USA because of arthritis. [Healthy people]  350 million people worldwide have arthritis.  37 million people in USA. wrongdiagnosis.com  Health care: $81 billion annually in USA. abcnews.go.com
  • 5.
     Using chondrocytescells for cartilage repair.  Chondrocytes are cells that build and maintain cartilage.  Isolating and seeding of chondrocytes cells found from porcine knees of patient.  The cells are mature differentiated chondrocytes or osteochondral progenitor cells, such as MSCs. (Huckle, et al. 2003) Chondrocytes: the cells that build and maintain cartilage http://saveyourself.ca/articles/shorts/2009-05-26- carticel-good-news-bad-news.php
  • 6.
     Isolating andseeding of chondrocytes: The cartilage tissue was harvested from porcine knees.  Preparation of protein-loaded chitosan microsphere: Solution mixed with FITC-BSA (fluorescein isothiocyanate bovine serum albumin) or TGF-β1(transforming growth factor –beta1).  Preparation of chitosan scaffold containing MS-TGF  SEM (scanning electron microscopy) measurement:- Chondrocytes were growing on the scaffold. ( Sung Eun Kim, et al. 2006)
  • 7.
     Chitosan microsphereloaded with proteins, BSA (bovine serum albumin) and TGF (transforming growth factor)in the presence of TPP (Thiamine pyrophosphate)  The size of microspheres was reduced by the protein.  Diffusion of TPP into microspheres is time dependent and critical to maintain the shape of microsphere .  The cross-linking time should be longer than 20 min. (Sung Eun Kim, et al. 2006)
  • 8.
    Results cont’d In vitroprotein release from microspheres:  The proteins, BSA (bovine serum albumin) and TGF (transforming growth factor) were released in biphasic manner.  implies that initially the rate of release is fast and later the release is slower.  BSA and TGF released at initial phase, 48.8% and 14.5% respectively.  Release rate of TGF-beta 1 from Release profiles of FITC– microspheres was lower than BSA BSA (0) and TGF-β1 from over the whole experiment chitosan microspheres .  BSA (90.1%) released within 5 days.  Release amount of TGF- beta1 only 44.9% for 7 days. ( Sung Eun Kim, et al. 2006)
  • 9.
    Results cont’d Chondrocytes growthon chitosan scaffolds without microsphere-TGF  SEM (scanning electron microscopy) used for evaluation cell morphology and proliferation.  After 4 days, chondrocytes were present in the superficial area of the scaffold and maintain a spherical morphology.  After 7 days, chondrocytes were slightly proliferated without spreading. ( Sung Eun Kim, et al. 2006) Scanning electron micrographs of chondrocytes grown on chitosan scaffold for (a) 4 days and (b) 7 days after seeding.
  • 10.
    Results cont’d After 4days , chondrocytes cells grow on chitosan scaffold with MS-TGF, there was a significant increase in the number. After 7 days , chondrocytes were proliferated and open pores of scaffold occupied by the numbers of aggregates, composed of several chondrocytes. ( Sung Eun Kim, et al. 2006) Scanning electron micrographs of chondrocytes grown on chitosan scaffold, seeded with chitosan microsphere containing TGF-β1. (a) Four days after seeding; the cells were merged to form large aggregates adherent to the scaffold. (b) Magnified view of a representative chondrocyte grown for 4 days. (c) Seven days after seeding
  • 11.
     TGF-β1, haspromote the protein synthesis and cell proliferation in articular cartilage. It acts as an autocrine regulator of chondrocytes.  It also inhibits the actions of matrix metalloproteinase that play an important role in the digestion of the ECM in both normal and degenerative articular cartilage. ( Sung Eun Kim, et al. 2006).
  • 12.
     Using MSCsstem cells for cartilage repair.  Implant MSCs encapsulated collagen based scaffold.  Stem cells found in all multi cellular organisms. They can renew themselves and differentiate to different cell types.  Two types of stem cells:  Embryonic stem cells  Adult stem cells
  • 13.
     Adult stemcells are undifferentiated cells that are found in bone morrow, blood stream, retina and cornea of the eyes. (Bigaria, et. al 2006) http://www.stemcellresearch.org/testimony/prentice.h tm
  • 14.
     MSCs isfound in the bone marrow.  MSCs can differentiate to many different cell types: (Bobis, et. al 2006)  Chondrocytes ( Cartilage)  Osteoblasts (Bone)  Myocytes (Muscle)  MSCs don’t trigger the immune response. (Bonfield, et. al 2010)  MSCs are immunosuppression. (Patel, et. al 2008)
  • 15.
     Implanting MSCsin a rabbit cartilage defect.  MSCs encapsulated in collagen hydrogel (CH) and collagen alginate hydrogel (CAH) scaffolds.  The scaffold encapsulated in five groups of champers:  CH + TGF-Beta1  CH - TGF-Beta1  CAH + TGF-Beta1  CAH - TGF-Beta1  MSCs without any scaffolds nor growth factors  The champers implanted in the rabbits for 8 weeks.  After 8m weeks, the rabbits sacrificed and champers collected.
  • 16.
     MSCs withoutany scaffolds, no tissue found. HE staining of sectioned tissue inside diffusion chamber showed: (A) CH –TGF-b1 group showed cells of round shape and high cell density. (B) CAH –TGF-b1 group showed lower cell density of round shape. (C) CH +TGF-b1 group showed cells of round shape and high cell density. (D) CAH +TGF-b1 group showed cells of round shape and high cell density.
  • 17.
    Immunohistochemical examination ofsectioned tissue inside diffusion chamber showed:  (A, E) CH –TGF-b1 group showed intense positive staining of type II collagen.  (B, F): CAH –TGF-b1 group showed less positive staining of type II collagen.  (C, G) CH +TGF-b1 group showed highly positive staining of type II collagen.  (D, H) CAH +TGF-b1 group showed highly positive staining of type II collagen.
  • 18.
     MSCs candifferentiate to chondrocytes without interact with body fluids.  A scaffold must be used for chondrogenesis to happen.  CH support more chondrogenesis than CAH.  TGF-b1 is important for MSCs differentiation.
  • 19.
     Tissue engineeredchondrocytes can be used to treat cartilage damage.  MSCs can be used to treat cartilage damage:  Reduce the cost of healthcare for arthritis patients.  Give arthritis patients definitive treatment.  Open the way to treat other diseases.  Limitation:  TGF-β1 appears to be a powerful molecule to repair damaged cartilage. But high dose of intra-articular injection may induce chemotaxis and activation of inflammatory cells, resulting in fibrosis and osteophyte formation in cartilage defects.  Number of surgeries that should be done to cover all the affected areas.
  • 20.
     Which betterto use chondrocytes or MSCs?  Do you think using these methods will be effective to treat arthritis?
  • 21.
     Bagaria, V.,et al., Stem cells in orthopedics: current concepts and possible future applications. Indian J Med Sci, 2006. 60(4): p. 162-9.  Bobis, S., D. Jarocha, and M. Majka, Mesenchymal stem cells: characteristics and clinical applications. Folia Histochem Cytobiol, 2006. 44(4): p. 215-30.  Bonfield, T.L., et al., Defining human mesenchymal stem cell efficacy in vivo. J Inflamm (Lond), 2010. 7: p. 51.  Patel, S.A., et al., Immunological properties of mesenchymal stem cells and clinical implications. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz), 2008. 56(1): p. 1-8.  Zheng, L., et al., Chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells induced by collagen-based hydrogel: an in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2010. 93(2): p. 783-92.  sung eun kim , et al.Porous chitson scaffold containing microspheres loaded with transforming growth factors-beta1: implications for cartilage tissue engineering: Biomedical Research Center, 19 May 2003.  Huckle, et al. Differentiated chondrocytes for cartilage tissue engineering: 2003.