This document analyzes and compares several double page spreads. It discusses elements like layout, use of images, colors, font, and space usage. Overall assessments are provided for each spread, noting what elements work well and could be improved. Some spreads use clear, interesting photos and fonts that are easy to read. Others are said to have boring, low quality photos and colors that don't blend well. The masthead, text size, and balance of elements vary across spreads, with some being more eye-catching and professionally designed than others.

2. Things you should think about!
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
You must consider…
Basic layout – can you see a ‘grid’?
Column width and positioning
Font and type size
Use of space
Colours
Use of images
Page numbers
Branding
Captions
How image and text are integrated

3. The colour is boring but somehow it goes with the
text and the picture so in a way the colour is good
however if you wanted it to be more eye catching
then you would add bright colours so people
would be drawn to it.
In this double page
spread, I like the
photo as it is very
clear and a great
picture however
some people may
say it is a bit boring
as it does not have
much colour,
brightness.
This text in this double
page spread is good as
it is clear and easy to
read and is in a nice
format and in the right
place, the way the
writing is laid out is
nice as it is neat and
goes with the picture
and the colour.
Over all I like this double page spread as it is
clear, nicely laid out, and has a very nice and
clear picture to go with it all. Maybe could be
a bit more colourful if you wanted it to be
more eye catching.

4. The Mast head on this double page spread is much more interesting than the other
one, this one is bigger, interesting and fun!
It is eye catching where as the other one way not.
I like this mast heading on this one as it is big and loud, all this makes it more fun
and interesting to read.
The use of space is
good there is not
loads of left over
room and space has
been filled up nicely.
The text, the text is not very
big and bold in this double
page spread so it may be hard
to read or not very appealing
to read.
Maybe if the text was a little
bigger so people could read it
easier that would be better.
All the
colours go
together and
it looks good
This double page spread is very
different in many ways, for example
the picture is of a person not a
landscape and is a bright red colour
not all a dull brownie colour.

5. This double page spread
compared to the other ones
I've analysed is really bad.
Overall I do not like this
double spread page as its
boring, has bad photo’s and
has really bad colours.
The large
random
text
makes it
look
basic and
unprofes
sional, it
looks
amateur
The photo’s used are all bad photo's, they are
boring, plain and they ALL have really really bad
lighting . The other double page spreads had good,
clear, interesting photo’s however this one does
not.
The colours are bright
and do stand however
they do NOT go well
together it’s colourful
with the wrong colours.
The space is
filled up and
they have used
the space well
however it looks
way to busy and
crowed.
The font is very small and not
easy to read, its boring and
would not make someone
wont to read this.