The document provides an analysis of different contents pages for a school magazine. It notes positives and negatives of each contents page. One contents page is praised for its bold color scheme and use of pictures but criticized for a childlike font. Another is said to have bold font and color but the triangle color needs adjusting. A third is criticized for a bright green color that makes the text hard to read. The last page is said to have clashing colors that work and pictures arranged orderly, but one section is too small to read.

1. Analysing contents pages
Kayleigh Holley

2. This contents page is good as it
uses a colour scheme that stands
out and it uses pictures to make it
more appealing to the target
audience. However it is bad as it
uses a childlike font that even
though it may appeal to some, it
wont appeal to others and in some
places its quite squashed together
making it hard to read.

3. This contents page is good as it has
bold font and colour scheme. Again
pictures are used which would appeal
to the target audience. However ....
Where the triangle is red they had to
change the colouring of the last two
letters to make it stand out. They should
have change the triangle colour to make
it work better. Also...
The green here is too bright making it
harder to read. The editor has tried and
failed to make this stand out and work
with the rest of the magazine. They should
have stuck to the a bold classic colour to fit
with the rest of the contents page.

4. In my opinion this is rather good for a school
magazines contents page. I like how the
colours clash, but in a way it works. The font is
in a way child like but in another way is bold
and simple. The pictures are overlapping in an
orderly fashion and this can appeal to any age
group. The text also stands out on the
background picture. The background picture is
good as you can see its within the school but
its faint enough so that you can see what the
contents say.
However this does not work. Not only
does it not relate to what should be on a
school magazines contents page, it is
too small for anyone to read. If this was
taken off and put into the main content
of the magazine this contents page
would be a lot better.