Baseline Survey Study for
    Projects on Infrastructure Developments
                    in Nepal
                 Umesh Kumar Mandal
                   Associate Professor
            Central Department of Geography
             Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur


             Email: umesh_jee@hotmail.com
Training on Management of Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation (MLARR)
for the senior executives of DoR,17-20 January, 2013, Hotel Space Mountain, Nagarkot
           Organized by Road Sector skill development Unit(RSSDU) & RHF
What is baseline Study ?
• A baseline study is a descriptive cross-sectional
  survey that mostly provides quantitative information
  on the current status of a particular situation - on
  whatever study topic - in a given population
• It aims at quantifying the distribution of certain
  variables in a study population at one point in time.
  It involves the systematic collection and
  presentation of data to give a clear picture of a
  particular situation as it relates the following: What?
  Who? Where? When? Why? How?
• A baseline normally covers only a sample of the
  population. If a baseline study covers the entire
  population it is called a census (FAO, 2004)
What is baseline Study ?
• In RAIDP, a baseline study generates information
  on the socio-economic status of a given population
  on selected indicators in a specific clusters.
• The baseline study is repeated at the completion of
  the development project/programme
  implementation to measure changes that have
  occurred over time in the characteristics that were
  studied before the beginning of the programme
What is baseline Study ?
• A baseline study involves providing a snapshot of
  the standard of living in a community/population at
  a given moment. Depending on the information
  needs of the entity, a new snapshot is taken at
  least every two to four years (depending on the
  length of the project). These snapshots (and the
  analysis of the changes in between the snapshots)
  provide the information needed to (re)design a
  project or programme( Oury 2008).
What is baseline data ?
• Baseline data are critical reference points for
  assessing changes
• Baseline data is used as a starting point for
  gauging progress towards the goal and objectives
  and measuring the level and direction of change
• It establishes a basis for comparing the situation
  before and after an intervention and making
  inferences as to the effectiveness of the project
• Baseline data should include the kind of information
  that would be appropriate for measuring changes in
  accordance with the objectives of the programme
  or intervention
What is baseline data ?
• Baseline data can be quantitative or qualitative or a
  combination of both.
• The situation analysis and need assessment
 can provide some information that can serve as
a baseline.
Question to ask about baseline
            plan ?
• Does the baseline data describe the situation prior
  to the intervention?
• Was it collected (will it be collected) within a
  timeframe close enough to the intervention so that
  meaningful conclusions can be reached regarding
  changes measured? There is no standard,
  recommended timeframe for meaningful, baseline
  data. The value of data for gauging possible
  change depends greatly on the context and
  environment.
• Does the information describe the situation and
  measure factors that the objectives address?
Question to ask about baseline
            plan ?
• Does the data accurately reflect the situation for the
  target population? If taken from a sample, can
  meaningful inferences be made about the target
  population?

• It is not always necessary or feasible for
  organizations to conduct extensive baseline
  studies. Keep in mind that baseline data can also
  be collected from existing sources.
Illustrative Baseline Surveys

• Nepal Living Standard Survey 2003/04& 2010/11

• Poverty Alleviation Fund (PAF): M and E
  Baseline Survey 2010
• Nepal Demographic Health Survey
• Labor force survey
Quantitative ?
Quantitative (or numerical) data provides
 comparable data on “who” and “how much.
Methods for collecting quantitative data:

• Surveys
• Service provider records (health, justice, social
  service records
• Demographic data
• Administrative records
Qualitative ?
Qualitative approaches provide contextual, in-depth
  information on the “why” and “how.” Qualitative
  information complements and provides greater
  insight into quantitative data.
Challenges and limitations of qualitative methods:
• Qualitative participatory methods require more
  time and resources
• Qualitative data is harder to analyze and compare
• Qualitative data is sometimes less “credible” to
  policy makers and donors who prefer numbers
Qualitative
Methods for collecting qualitative data :
• Case Study
• Comparable views from diverse stakeholders
•     Triangulation:(document      review,    individual
  interviews and focus group discussions), informants
    and researchers allowed for triangulation of the
  data to corroborate and validate the findings
• Participation of key stakeholders
• Dialogue providing a neutral ground among some
  sectors that rarely interacted( voiceless) and in the
  consensus-building       process      around       the
BASELINE STUDY                    END LINE STUDY/
                                   FOLLOW UP STUDY



                      PROJECT             AFTER
BEFORE              INTERVENTIO
                         N




                 • CHANGE or IMPACT
                   ASSESSMENT
Why conduct a baseline Study ?
 • To determine the extent of socio-economic
   patterns in a population and the usage levels of
   certain services, and to collect demographic
   information ( production, travel time/cost to socio-
   economic centers etc.)

 • To draw conclusions that can be applied generally
   to the whole population of a locality/intervention
   zone
Why conduct a baseline Study ?
 • To determine current indicator levels : transport ;
   non-agriculture activities , income, expenditure,
   - entrepreneurship ; education and health
   before intervention to prepare the programme
   objectives     and       to      evaluate        the
   progress/accomplishment       of  the     additional
   objectives

 • To establish the target level/objectives of the
   project/programme or to provide base values for
   the chosen indicators
The Stages Involved In A
        Baseline Study
1. Rationale and objectives

2. Description of the research location/geographical
  context

3. Methodology of the survey

4. Results

5. Conclusions and recommendations
Detailed Design of A Baseline
           Study
1. Formulating the study purpose
2. Formulating the problem statement
3. Research justification/rationale
4. Literature review
5. Setting study objectives
6. Methodology
7. Implementation of the baseline study in the
   field
8. Presentation of survey findings
1.Rationale and objectives
• In formulating the study objectives, bear the
  following in mind:
• Objectives must cover the different aspects of the problem
  and its contributing factors in a coherent and logical
  sequence.
• The objectives must be clearly phrased in operational
  terms, specifying exactly what needs to be done, where and
  for what purpose.
• Objectives must be realistic considering local conditions.
• Action verbs that are specific and measurable must be used
  in formulating the objectives. Examples of action verbs
  include: to determine, to compare, to verify, to calculate, to
  describe and to establish. Avoid such verbs as to
  appreciate, to understand or to study.
Setting study objectives using
     the SMART principle

Specific
Measurable
Achievable
Realistic
Time-framed
For Example: Project
  Development Objective (PDO) of
     RAIDP Road Sub-project
• 20 percent increase in motorize and non-motorized
  trips by beneficiaries by the end of the Project
  (EOP), and

• 20 percent reduction in travel time by beneficiaries
  by EOP

• 30 percent increase in annual average daily traffic
  (AADT) with the project districts in the categories
  bus, truck, micro bus and jeep
Project Output Indicators
• 15% increase in the number of people in
  participating hill districts that live within four hours
  of walking to an all-season road, and




• 10% increase in the number of people in
  participating Tarai districts that live within two hours
  of walking to an all-season road
2. Description of the research
location/geographical context

• This section contains the criteria used for selecting
  the location as well as gathering general
  information on the study population
Illustration: RAIDP Participating
                Districts
• Cluster I:   Kailali, Bardiya, Banke, and
  Salyan, Kanchanpur, Surkhet, Dang
• Cluster II: Kapilvastu, Rupandehi,
  Nawalparasi and
  Palpa,Pyuthan,Gulmi,Arghakhanchi
• Cluster III: Rasuwa, Kaski, Syangja,
  Dhading, Nuwakot and
  Makawanpur,Tanahu
• Cluster IV: Rautahat, Sarlahi, Mahottari,
  Dhanusa, Siraha and Udayapur
  ,Bara,Parsa,Saptari ( Map)
3. Methodology of the study
• This section must provide a detailed outline of
  the overall study and describe the design of the
  tools, the sampling strategies (including the
  sizes of the samples) and the methods used for
  gathering the data. It is necessary to explain
  and justify the use of the research
  specifications and the methods chosen and
  also to discuss all the problems encountered
Experimental Design
Sampling methods and sampling
             size
• Sampling: Sampling is essential because
  populations tend to be large and resources and
  time available limited with the result that it is usually
  not possible to study each person. For this reason
  there is little choice but to select a sample from the
  population and from it make projections or
  generalizations regarding the entire population
• Representativeness
Sampling methods
• Systematic random sampling
• Stratified random sampling
• Cluster sampling
Sample size
Total       Suggested Percentage
number   of number of
group        sample
100            15         15
200            20         10
500            50         10
1000           50          5
Data collection tools and procedures
1. Sex                 1. Female
                       2. Male

2. Age group           1. 15 - 20 years
                       2. 21 - 30 years

                       3. 31 - 40 years

                       4. 41 and above

3. Place of delivery   1. Home
                       2. General hospital

                       3. Private hospital
Preparing the baseline study
           report
• The Executive Summary
• The Introduction
•Presentation of findings
•Conclusions and recommendations
Data analysis
 • Univariate analysis
• Bivariate analysis

 Multivariate analysis
Preparing the baseline study
           report
  • The Executive Summary
 • The Introduction

  •Presentation of findings

   •Conclusions and recommendations
THANK YOU
  For Comments and
      Discussion
Review of project related documents


•    Project Appraisal Document
•    Proposed Additional Grant
•     Social Screening
•     Environmental and social management
    framework
Review of Earlier Baseline Survey Methodology


• Nepal Living Standard Survey 2003/04
• Poverty Alleviation Fund (PAF): M and E
  Baseline Survey 2010
• Rural Access Program 2009
• Impact Evaluation of rural road project, World
  Bank, 2008
• Socio-economic baseline survey of rural road
  in Afganistan,2009
Key components derived from earlier Baseline
            Survey Methodology




• Census or Sample districts
• Defining primary sample unit(PSU)
• 12-15 sampled households selected from each
  PSU
Developing baseline survey methodology of rural
           roads for RAIDP districts
     Bases of developing methodology mentioned
    in TOR
•    Sound statistical analysis to be performed on
    baseline data
•    Project (Treatment) and Control( Non-
    treatment) Areas to be selected with the
    consultation of DoLIDAR and DDCs
•    Zone of Influences
•    Acceptable sample household from
    settlement( minimum 20 hh)
•   Sampled HH to be contained social groups
•   Piloting of survey designed
Developing baseline survey methodology of rural
           roads for RAIDP districts
Multi- Stage Quasi- randomized design
Stage 1: one road from each 20 existing
  district and all roads almost 20 are from 10
  additional new districts). 40 roads from 30
  districts
Stage 2: Total 80 PSUs , 2 PSUs from each
  road for project and control areas
  separately.

Stage 3: 20 sampled households, 15 for project
  and 5 for control area
Data Sources

1.  Secondary
•   RAIDP documents/Various project reports
•   District level statistical data
•   Nepal Living Standard Survey
2. Primary data
• Household questionnaire Survey
•    Settlement level FGD
• Traffic Flow Survey
•    GPS survey
• SDC check list
Survey tools for Project areas


• Household level questionnaire survey
  ( 450 hh) ( Nepali Conversion)
• Focus group discussion (FGD) at
  settlement level ( 30 FGDs)
• Accessibility or Traffic flow survey of
  selected road ( 30)
• GPS location of HH intervened ( 600 hh)
• GPS location for PSU
Survey tools for control areas


• Household level questionnaire survey
  ( 150)
• Focus group discussion (FGD) at
  settlement level( 30 FGDs)
• GPS location of HH intervened
• GPS location of PSU


  • Pre-test of survey tools
  • Cluster level orientation
Baseline Data Analysis


•   Project and Control Areas Comparasion
•   Ecological regions
•   Clusters
•   Caste and Ethnicity
•   Descriptive statistical summary measures
Output of Baseline Survey Study


• Baseline Survey Report
• GPS location of surveyed HH &
  Settlements
• Database of Study report
• Socio-economic Database:
  – Household level
  – Settlement level
  – Traffic survey
Major Findings
Demography of Sampled Population

• Male population is seen higher both
  program and control area (male 52.42% and
  female 47.58%).
• Average household size in project area and
  control villages was 6. 4 and 6.6
  respectively
• Average family size of project area has
  slightly decreased.
• average household size of project road
  has increased than national level, 5.3
  in2003/04. and 4.7 (NLSS 2010/11
Demography of Sampled Population


• Average household size of High hill caste
  in project is 5.85 ,Muslim ( 7.92)
• In control , Terai caste (5.6), muslim ( 9.38)
Dependency ratio of Sampled Population
Region              Survey         Dependency ratio
                    clusters
Terai                          1                      56.48
                               2                      55.93
                               4                      56.75
Terai total                                           56.52
Hill                           1                      57.79
                               2                      46.69
                               3                      52.96
                               4                      61.76
Hill total                                            51.72
Grand Total                                           54.30

The overall dependency ratio of the survey districts in
different clusters is 54.30 (see Table 2.2a & Table 2.2b),
which is much lower than the decreasing trend of
national average figure of both periods 84.4 ( NLSS
2010/11) and 89 (NLSS 2003/4).
Degree of spatial mobility

  Table-2.3a: Degree of spatial mobility by eco-regions and project
                                                      & control area

Survey      Eco- Sample              People
Regions          Population          migrated       Migration (%)
Terai                   2074              159             7.67
Hill                    1760              154             8.75
Project                 3834              313             8.16
Terai                    734               30             4.09
Hill                     581               40             6.88
Control                 1315               70             5.32
Total                   5149              383             7.44
Degree of spatial mobility
          Project area               Control area
Caste/ethn Sample                     Sample People Migrat
icity and Populati People    Migrati Populat migrat ion
area        on      migrated on (%) ion      ed     (%)
High hill
caste          1289      114     8.84    308     18    5.84
Hill Dalits     311       27     8.68    135      8    5.93
Hill
Janajati        723       70     9.68    413     26    6.30
Terai
caste           590       31     5.25    140      4    2.86
Terai
Dalit           539       38     7.05    160     10    6.25
Terai
Janajati        156       15     9.62     84      2    2.38
Musalman        198       18     9.09     75      2    2.67
Other
Degree of spatial mobility
                Project area                            Control area


                  No
                of                                         No of
Caste/ethni     People                                    People
city and        Travell                        Other     Travell                        Other
Area            ed      Nepal India            countries ed      Nepal         India    countries
High hill
caste             114          27.19   33.33    39.47       18         11.11    27.78    61.11
Hill Dalits        27           3.70   62.96    33.33        8         12.50    75.00    12.50
Hill Janajati      70          28.57   34.29    37.14       26          7.69    15.38    76.92
Terai caste        31          12.90   16.13    70.97        4         50.00    50.00    0.00
Terai Dalit        38          31.58   28.95    39.47       10         60.00    30.00    10.00
Terai
Janajati           15           0.00   53.33    46.67        2         50.00    50.00    0.00
Muslim             18           5.56   22.22    72.22        2          0.00    50.00    50.00
Other caste         0           0.00    0.00     0.00        0          0.00     0.00    0.00
Sub-total         313          22.04   34.19    43.77       70         20.00    31.43    48.57
 Total            383          21.67   33.68    44.65
Literacy Rate
Surveyed        Sample                             % 0f Literate people
clusters       Populatio          Male                   Female                   Both
               ns 6years
               and
               above


                           N0          %           N0          %           N0          %
Cluster -I          985          480       92.13         364       78.45         844       85.69
Cluster -II         842          413       94.94         325       79.85         738       87.65
Cluster -III        698          332       91.71         264       78.57         596       85.39
Cluster -IV         951          442       86.84         313       70.81         755       79.39
Project            3476         1667       91.24        1266       76.77        2933       84.38
Cluster -I          358          168       91.30         135       77.59         303       84.64
Cluster -II         348          158       89.77         133       77.33         291       83.62
Cluster -III        199           90       88.24          69       71.13         159       79.90
Cluster -IV         304          149       88.69         101       74.26         250       82.24
Control            1209          565       89.68         438       75.65        1003       82.96
THANK YOU
  For Comments and
      Discussion
Why developing methodology for baseline survey
      of rural road for RAIDP by World Bank

• Evaluation of impact assessment
• No concrete methodology developed by World
  Bank but guidelines.
• Methodological drawbacks in earlier baseline
  survey
• developing statistical sound methodology
Drawbacks of Earlier Baseline Survey


• Three level of zone of influence is not covered.
• Control village selected is not based on similar
  existing level of accessibility to main road network,
  basic economic and social facilities
• Questionnaire developed is not in form of
  questionnaire rather draft table.
• Household interviewed can not be identified now
  because of lack of data base
Required data for road alignment and covering
                    VDCs

Baseline study survey on infrastructure projects in nepal

  • 1.
    Baseline Survey Studyfor Projects on Infrastructure Developments in Nepal Umesh Kumar Mandal Associate Professor Central Department of Geography Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur Email: umesh_jee@hotmail.com Training on Management of Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation (MLARR) for the senior executives of DoR,17-20 January, 2013, Hotel Space Mountain, Nagarkot Organized by Road Sector skill development Unit(RSSDU) & RHF
  • 2.
    What is baselineStudy ? • A baseline study is a descriptive cross-sectional survey that mostly provides quantitative information on the current status of a particular situation - on whatever study topic - in a given population • It aims at quantifying the distribution of certain variables in a study population at one point in time. It involves the systematic collection and presentation of data to give a clear picture of a particular situation as it relates the following: What? Who? Where? When? Why? How? • A baseline normally covers only a sample of the population. If a baseline study covers the entire population it is called a census (FAO, 2004)
  • 3.
    What is baselineStudy ? • In RAIDP, a baseline study generates information on the socio-economic status of a given population on selected indicators in a specific clusters. • The baseline study is repeated at the completion of the development project/programme implementation to measure changes that have occurred over time in the characteristics that were studied before the beginning of the programme
  • 4.
    What is baselineStudy ? • A baseline study involves providing a snapshot of the standard of living in a community/population at a given moment. Depending on the information needs of the entity, a new snapshot is taken at least every two to four years (depending on the length of the project). These snapshots (and the analysis of the changes in between the snapshots) provide the information needed to (re)design a project or programme( Oury 2008).
  • 5.
    What is baselinedata ? • Baseline data are critical reference points for assessing changes • Baseline data is used as a starting point for gauging progress towards the goal and objectives and measuring the level and direction of change • It establishes a basis for comparing the situation before and after an intervention and making inferences as to the effectiveness of the project • Baseline data should include the kind of information that would be appropriate for measuring changes in accordance with the objectives of the programme or intervention
  • 6.
    What is baselinedata ? • Baseline data can be quantitative or qualitative or a combination of both. • The situation analysis and need assessment can provide some information that can serve as a baseline.
  • 7.
    Question to askabout baseline plan ? • Does the baseline data describe the situation prior to the intervention? • Was it collected (will it be collected) within a timeframe close enough to the intervention so that meaningful conclusions can be reached regarding changes measured? There is no standard, recommended timeframe for meaningful, baseline data. The value of data for gauging possible change depends greatly on the context and environment. • Does the information describe the situation and measure factors that the objectives address?
  • 8.
    Question to askabout baseline plan ? • Does the data accurately reflect the situation for the target population? If taken from a sample, can meaningful inferences be made about the target population? • It is not always necessary or feasible for organizations to conduct extensive baseline studies. Keep in mind that baseline data can also be collected from existing sources.
  • 9.
    Illustrative Baseline Surveys •Nepal Living Standard Survey 2003/04& 2010/11 • Poverty Alleviation Fund (PAF): M and E Baseline Survey 2010 • Nepal Demographic Health Survey • Labor force survey
  • 10.
    Quantitative ? Quantitative (ornumerical) data provides comparable data on “who” and “how much. Methods for collecting quantitative data: • Surveys • Service provider records (health, justice, social service records • Demographic data • Administrative records
  • 11.
    Qualitative ? Qualitative approachesprovide contextual, in-depth information on the “why” and “how.” Qualitative information complements and provides greater insight into quantitative data. Challenges and limitations of qualitative methods: • Qualitative participatory methods require more time and resources • Qualitative data is harder to analyze and compare • Qualitative data is sometimes less “credible” to policy makers and donors who prefer numbers
  • 12.
    Qualitative Methods for collectingqualitative data : • Case Study • Comparable views from diverse stakeholders • Triangulation:(document review, individual interviews and focus group discussions), informants and researchers allowed for triangulation of the data to corroborate and validate the findings • Participation of key stakeholders • Dialogue providing a neutral ground among some sectors that rarely interacted( voiceless) and in the consensus-building process around the
  • 13.
    BASELINE STUDY END LINE STUDY/ FOLLOW UP STUDY PROJECT AFTER BEFORE INTERVENTIO N • CHANGE or IMPACT ASSESSMENT
  • 14.
    Why conduct abaseline Study ? • To determine the extent of socio-economic patterns in a population and the usage levels of certain services, and to collect demographic information ( production, travel time/cost to socio- economic centers etc.) • To draw conclusions that can be applied generally to the whole population of a locality/intervention zone
  • 15.
    Why conduct abaseline Study ? • To determine current indicator levels : transport ; non-agriculture activities , income, expenditure, - entrepreneurship ; education and health before intervention to prepare the programme objectives and to evaluate the progress/accomplishment of the additional objectives • To establish the target level/objectives of the project/programme or to provide base values for the chosen indicators
  • 16.
    The Stages InvolvedIn A Baseline Study 1. Rationale and objectives 2. Description of the research location/geographical context 3. Methodology of the survey 4. Results 5. Conclusions and recommendations
  • 17.
    Detailed Design ofA Baseline Study 1. Formulating the study purpose 2. Formulating the problem statement 3. Research justification/rationale 4. Literature review 5. Setting study objectives 6. Methodology 7. Implementation of the baseline study in the field 8. Presentation of survey findings
  • 18.
    1.Rationale and objectives •In formulating the study objectives, bear the following in mind: • Objectives must cover the different aspects of the problem and its contributing factors in a coherent and logical sequence. • The objectives must be clearly phrased in operational terms, specifying exactly what needs to be done, where and for what purpose. • Objectives must be realistic considering local conditions. • Action verbs that are specific and measurable must be used in formulating the objectives. Examples of action verbs include: to determine, to compare, to verify, to calculate, to describe and to establish. Avoid such verbs as to appreciate, to understand or to study.
  • 19.
    Setting study objectivesusing the SMART principle Specific Measurable Achievable Realistic Time-framed
  • 20.
    For Example: Project Development Objective (PDO) of RAIDP Road Sub-project • 20 percent increase in motorize and non-motorized trips by beneficiaries by the end of the Project (EOP), and • 20 percent reduction in travel time by beneficiaries by EOP • 30 percent increase in annual average daily traffic (AADT) with the project districts in the categories bus, truck, micro bus and jeep
  • 21.
    Project Output Indicators •15% increase in the number of people in participating hill districts that live within four hours of walking to an all-season road, and • 10% increase in the number of people in participating Tarai districts that live within two hours of walking to an all-season road
  • 22.
    2. Description ofthe research location/geographical context • This section contains the criteria used for selecting the location as well as gathering general information on the study population
  • 23.
    Illustration: RAIDP Participating Districts • Cluster I: Kailali, Bardiya, Banke, and Salyan, Kanchanpur, Surkhet, Dang • Cluster II: Kapilvastu, Rupandehi, Nawalparasi and Palpa,Pyuthan,Gulmi,Arghakhanchi • Cluster III: Rasuwa, Kaski, Syangja, Dhading, Nuwakot and Makawanpur,Tanahu • Cluster IV: Rautahat, Sarlahi, Mahottari, Dhanusa, Siraha and Udayapur ,Bara,Parsa,Saptari ( Map)
  • 24.
    3. Methodology ofthe study • This section must provide a detailed outline of the overall study and describe the design of the tools, the sampling strategies (including the sizes of the samples) and the methods used for gathering the data. It is necessary to explain and justify the use of the research specifications and the methods chosen and also to discuss all the problems encountered
  • 25.
  • 26.
    Sampling methods andsampling size • Sampling: Sampling is essential because populations tend to be large and resources and time available limited with the result that it is usually not possible to study each person. For this reason there is little choice but to select a sample from the population and from it make projections or generalizations regarding the entire population • Representativeness
  • 27.
    Sampling methods • Systematicrandom sampling • Stratified random sampling • Cluster sampling
  • 28.
    Sample size Total Suggested Percentage number of number of group sample 100 15 15 200 20 10 500 50 10 1000 50 5
  • 29.
    Data collection toolsand procedures 1. Sex 1. Female 2. Male 2. Age group 1. 15 - 20 years 2. 21 - 30 years 3. 31 - 40 years 4. 41 and above 3. Place of delivery 1. Home 2. General hospital 3. Private hospital
  • 30.
    Preparing the baselinestudy report • The Executive Summary • The Introduction •Presentation of findings •Conclusions and recommendations
  • 31.
    Data analysis •Univariate analysis • Bivariate analysis Multivariate analysis
  • 32.
    Preparing the baselinestudy report • The Executive Summary • The Introduction •Presentation of findings •Conclusions and recommendations
  • 33.
    THANK YOU For Comments and Discussion
  • 34.
    Review of projectrelated documents • Project Appraisal Document • Proposed Additional Grant • Social Screening • Environmental and social management framework
  • 35.
    Review of EarlierBaseline Survey Methodology • Nepal Living Standard Survey 2003/04 • Poverty Alleviation Fund (PAF): M and E Baseline Survey 2010 • Rural Access Program 2009 • Impact Evaluation of rural road project, World Bank, 2008 • Socio-economic baseline survey of rural road in Afganistan,2009
  • 36.
    Key components derivedfrom earlier Baseline Survey Methodology • Census or Sample districts • Defining primary sample unit(PSU) • 12-15 sampled households selected from each PSU
  • 37.
    Developing baseline surveymethodology of rural roads for RAIDP districts Bases of developing methodology mentioned in TOR • Sound statistical analysis to be performed on baseline data • Project (Treatment) and Control( Non- treatment) Areas to be selected with the consultation of DoLIDAR and DDCs • Zone of Influences • Acceptable sample household from settlement( minimum 20 hh) • Sampled HH to be contained social groups • Piloting of survey designed
  • 38.
    Developing baseline surveymethodology of rural roads for RAIDP districts Multi- Stage Quasi- randomized design Stage 1: one road from each 20 existing district and all roads almost 20 are from 10 additional new districts). 40 roads from 30 districts Stage 2: Total 80 PSUs , 2 PSUs from each road for project and control areas separately. Stage 3: 20 sampled households, 15 for project and 5 for control area
  • 39.
    Data Sources 1. Secondary • RAIDP documents/Various project reports • District level statistical data • Nepal Living Standard Survey 2. Primary data • Household questionnaire Survey • Settlement level FGD • Traffic Flow Survey • GPS survey • SDC check list
  • 40.
    Survey tools forProject areas • Household level questionnaire survey ( 450 hh) ( Nepali Conversion) • Focus group discussion (FGD) at settlement level ( 30 FGDs) • Accessibility or Traffic flow survey of selected road ( 30) • GPS location of HH intervened ( 600 hh) • GPS location for PSU
  • 41.
    Survey tools forcontrol areas • Household level questionnaire survey ( 150) • Focus group discussion (FGD) at settlement level( 30 FGDs) • GPS location of HH intervened • GPS location of PSU • Pre-test of survey tools • Cluster level orientation
  • 42.
    Baseline Data Analysis • Project and Control Areas Comparasion • Ecological regions • Clusters • Caste and Ethnicity • Descriptive statistical summary measures
  • 43.
    Output of BaselineSurvey Study • Baseline Survey Report • GPS location of surveyed HH & Settlements • Database of Study report • Socio-economic Database: – Household level – Settlement level – Traffic survey
  • 44.
  • 45.
    Demography of SampledPopulation • Male population is seen higher both program and control area (male 52.42% and female 47.58%). • Average household size in project area and control villages was 6. 4 and 6.6 respectively • Average family size of project area has slightly decreased. • average household size of project road has increased than national level, 5.3 in2003/04. and 4.7 (NLSS 2010/11
  • 46.
    Demography of SampledPopulation • Average household size of High hill caste in project is 5.85 ,Muslim ( 7.92) • In control , Terai caste (5.6), muslim ( 9.38)
  • 47.
    Dependency ratio ofSampled Population Region Survey Dependency ratio clusters Terai 1 56.48 2 55.93 4 56.75 Terai total 56.52 Hill 1 57.79 2 46.69 3 52.96 4 61.76 Hill total 51.72 Grand Total 54.30 The overall dependency ratio of the survey districts in different clusters is 54.30 (see Table 2.2a & Table 2.2b), which is much lower than the decreasing trend of national average figure of both periods 84.4 ( NLSS 2010/11) and 89 (NLSS 2003/4).
  • 48.
    Degree of spatialmobility Table-2.3a: Degree of spatial mobility by eco-regions and project & control area Survey Eco- Sample People Regions Population migrated Migration (%) Terai 2074 159 7.67 Hill 1760 154 8.75 Project 3834 313 8.16 Terai 734 30 4.09 Hill 581 40 6.88 Control 1315 70 5.32 Total 5149 383 7.44
  • 49.
    Degree of spatialmobility Project area Control area Caste/ethn Sample Sample People Migrat icity and Populati People Migrati Populat migrat ion area on migrated on (%) ion ed (%) High hill caste 1289 114 8.84 308 18 5.84 Hill Dalits 311 27 8.68 135 8 5.93 Hill Janajati 723 70 9.68 413 26 6.30 Terai caste 590 31 5.25 140 4 2.86 Terai Dalit 539 38 7.05 160 10 6.25 Terai Janajati 156 15 9.62 84 2 2.38 Musalman 198 18 9.09 75 2 2.67 Other
  • 50.
    Degree of spatialmobility Project area Control area No of No of Caste/ethni People People city and Travell Other Travell Other Area ed Nepal India countries ed Nepal India countries High hill caste 114 27.19 33.33 39.47 18 11.11 27.78 61.11 Hill Dalits 27 3.70 62.96 33.33 8 12.50 75.00 12.50 Hill Janajati 70 28.57 34.29 37.14 26 7.69 15.38 76.92 Terai caste 31 12.90 16.13 70.97 4 50.00 50.00 0.00 Terai Dalit 38 31.58 28.95 39.47 10 60.00 30.00 10.00 Terai Janajati 15 0.00 53.33 46.67 2 50.00 50.00 0.00 Muslim 18 5.56 22.22 72.22 2 0.00 50.00 50.00 Other caste 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 313 22.04 34.19 43.77 70 20.00 31.43 48.57 Total 383 21.67 33.68 44.65
  • 51.
    Literacy Rate Surveyed Sample % 0f Literate people clusters Populatio Male Female Both ns 6years and above N0 % N0 % N0 % Cluster -I 985 480 92.13 364 78.45 844 85.69 Cluster -II 842 413 94.94 325 79.85 738 87.65 Cluster -III 698 332 91.71 264 78.57 596 85.39 Cluster -IV 951 442 86.84 313 70.81 755 79.39 Project 3476 1667 91.24 1266 76.77 2933 84.38 Cluster -I 358 168 91.30 135 77.59 303 84.64 Cluster -II 348 158 89.77 133 77.33 291 83.62 Cluster -III 199 90 88.24 69 71.13 159 79.90 Cluster -IV 304 149 88.69 101 74.26 250 82.24 Control 1209 565 89.68 438 75.65 1003 82.96
  • 52.
    THANK YOU For Comments and Discussion
  • 53.
    Why developing methodologyfor baseline survey of rural road for RAIDP by World Bank • Evaluation of impact assessment • No concrete methodology developed by World Bank but guidelines. • Methodological drawbacks in earlier baseline survey • developing statistical sound methodology
  • 54.
    Drawbacks of EarlierBaseline Survey • Three level of zone of influence is not covered. • Control village selected is not based on similar existing level of accessibility to main road network, basic economic and social facilities • Questionnaire developed is not in form of questionnaire rather draft table. • Household interviewed can not be identified now because of lack of data base
  • 55.
    Required data forroad alignment and covering VDCs