An annotated bibliography includes bibliographic information for each source along with a brief summary and evaluation of each source. The summary should describe the main arguments or topics covered in the source, while the evaluation assesses how reliable the source is and how useful it is to the research project. Annotations should be 5-8 sentences evaluating the source's contribution and comparing it to other sources on the topic.
Here is a English 12 Essay presentation I made this year. Talks about the basics of essays, and the different types of essays.
Have fun educating yourself!
My Email: Tranc3r1992@gmail.com
Here is a English 12 Essay presentation I made this year. Talks about the basics of essays, and the different types of essays.
Have fun educating yourself!
My Email: Tranc3r1992@gmail.com
The Uni Tutor was established with the objective of providing 1st Class Essays to students across the world, in particular in the UK, US, Australia, US, and Canada.
Presentation is about How to write a Literary Essay: Literary Essay Format and Tips. If you don't know how to write an literary essay this presentation will give you useful information about it.If you want to know more about this follow this link http://www.literaryessay.org/
Do you know what expository essay is? If no, please watch this presentation and read an article. We hope it will be useful https://essay-academy.com/account/blog/what-is-an-expository-essay
The Uni Tutor was established with the objective of providing 1st Class Essays to students across the world, in particular in the UK, US, Australia, US, and Canada.
Presentation is about How to write a Literary Essay: Literary Essay Format and Tips. If you don't know how to write an literary essay this presentation will give you useful information about it.If you want to know more about this follow this link http://www.literaryessay.org/
Do you know what expository essay is? If no, please watch this presentation and read an article. We hope it will be useful https://essay-academy.com/account/blog/what-is-an-expository-essay
Final Paper The summative assignment for this course is to write a .docxcharlottej5
Final Paper The summative assignment for this course is to write a Final Paper on GROUP DEVELOPMENT MODELS focus on a dimension of group activity relevant to the field of human services. Requirements for this assignment are specified very broadly, enabling you to define your topic narrowly or broadly. These are as follows: •Identify a topic or topic area that defines management group activity relevant to human services. This identification will be part of the Week 4 Annotated Bibliography and Final Paper topic choice assignment, which also requires that you identify and annotate no fewer than eight scholarly resources to support your work. Click here to view a list of plausible topics, any of which may provide a plausible starting point for your topic selection. •Summarize what is known and what has been researched in the field surrounding your topic of choice. Include reference to two or three of the most current and important issues, questions, or debates that are guiding practice and research. •Select one of the issues, questions, or debates identified in the previous bullet and provide focused analysis of this subtopic, providing discussion of why the subtopic is important and evaluating the most prominent positions argued. •Support all analysis and argumentation with relevant theory, argumentation, evidence, and research provided in the course and outside sources. Your paper: •Must be 2,000 words in length. •Must cite and integrate no fewer than eight scholarly sources that were published within the past 6 years. No more than two sources published more than 6 years in the past may be cited and integrated if they are recognized as seminal works (classics in the field). •Proper APA format required, including cover page, citations, and reference page
Please complete paper and continue paper that is in attachment below!!!!!
Resources Required Text
Adams, K., & Galanes, G. (2017). Communicating in groups: Application and skills (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Chapter 10: Applying Leadership Principles Required References Active Presence. (2013, October 7). Facilitation skills: Best & worst facilitator practices [Video file]. Retrieved from Facilitation Skills: Best & Worst Facilitator Practices (Links to an external site.) American Psychological Association. (2004). Are six heads as good as twelve? [Web page]. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/research/action/jury.aspx (Links to an external site.) Frederick, J. (2017, June 28). Understanding jurors' nonverbal communication (Links to an external site.). GPSolo eReport, 2(1). Retrieved from https://www.americanbar.org/groups/gpsolo/publications/gpsolo_ereport/2012/august_2012/understanding_jurors_nonverbal_communication/ Lucas, A. (2015, April 15). The Importance of Verbal & Non Verbal Communication [Web page]. Retrieved from https://www.livestrong.com/article/156961-the-importance-of-verbal-non-verbal-communication/ (Links to an external site.) MindTools. (n.d.). .
Guidelines for Writing a Literature Review· Your final literat.docxwhittemorelucilla
Guidelines for Writing a Literature Review
· Your final literature review requires the selection of at least 10 credible articles from peer-reviewed journals. You may need to select and review a greater number of articles to arrive at 10 articles to address in your paper.
· The articles you have chosen should be those that offer the soundest empirical evidence, from which you will be drawing conclusions about your topic. The quality of your own paper rests on the quality of the published scholarship.
· The literature review should be between 5-6 pages in length, depending on how many sources you identified and how expansive the literature is on this topic. This does not include the title page, abstract, or references pages.
· The required format is double-spaced with 1-inch margins. Follow APA style guidelines in writing and citing references.
· Begin the review by introducing readers to your focal question. What is this question intended to address? You may state your “question” in the form of a problem if you like. This focal question will become part of your introduction.
· It is useful to tell the reader how the review is organized in your introduction section, somewhere between research question and the transition into the body of the review.
· If there is one major theme you want to highlight, state the theme. If there are three major themes or streams of thought on the topic, briefly name them—and then organize the balance of your literature review around those three streams. Think of themes, theories, concepts, lines of thought, and ideas as organizing strategies for your literature review.
· Once you state your focal question, write a transition sentence moving readers into the body of your literature review.
Example: Assume you are writing about the use of therapy dogs with children who have autism. Your focal question (problem statement) might be something along the lines of “Pilot studies suggest that children who have autism may benefit socially from having a therapy dog. However, one of the challenges in introducing a therapy dog to a child with autism is the child may not feel empathy toward the animal and therefore experience difficulty establishing a bond with the animal, let alone improving social functioning with other humans. Little has been explored about the use of therapy animals with children who have autism. This paper explores the use of therapy dogs with children who have autism to determine if the intervention helps these children develop social skills.” Next, you could transition into the body of the review with a sentence such as, “Scholars disagree about the effectiveness of therapy animals in treating children who have autism. One school of thought argues that . . . .”
· When you are done introducing the first line of thought, create a new paragraph to discuss studies which present another line of thought or opposing view.
· Don’t write a literature review where each paragraph discusses a single ...
Your week one paper asks you to do this..Week 1 Identify a su.docxransayo
Your week one paper asks you to do this..
Week 1: Identify a subject organization. Provide an initial assessment of some organizational problem utilizing relevant OD and change themes. Provide an annotated reference list of at least five peer-reviewed resources that can help you better understand the OD and change themes, and assess the organizational problem.
USE THESE LEVEL ONE HEADINGS AFTER YOU PROVIDE A BRIEF INTRODUCTION THAT INTRODUCES THE PURPOSE OF THE PAPER AND THE SUBTOPICS YOU WILL COVER.
Case Organization
In this section address the questions, what is the organization? what does it do? and who does it do it to/for? (BE SURE where you are providing facts about the organization you provide credible sources to support your claims of fact.)
Initial Assessment
In this section provide an initial assessment of some organizational problems that are evident in your case study organization. Your assessment in other courses have focused on problems related specifically to individuals, group/teams, or organizational levels (that were the focus of the specific course). In this course, you will use your full range of organizational and leadership theory knowledge across all levels and interact between the levels to determine needed interventions and change.
Symptoms
In this subheading answer the question: What are the symptoms of the problems?
Evidence
In this subheading answer the question: What is the evidence that problems actually exist?
Relevant Themes
In this subheading answer the question: What are the relevant OD and change themes that might explain the problems (and not just the symptoms)?
Annotated Reference List
In this section Provide an annotated reference list of at least five peer-reviewed resources that can help you better understand the team’s themes and assess the organizational problem. IMPORTANT – an Annotated Reference List is not like the regular reference list at the end of a paper. An annotated reference list is a list of references that after the reference you provide a brief summary (usually about 150 words) descriptive and evaluative paragraph. The purpose of the annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited.
The reference you select for your annotated reference list are not the references you use for this paper. They are studies you have selected from the library or other credible sources which will be valuable in your future research on the team issues which may be problematic to your case organization.
As always, contact me if you have any questions. Better to understand what is expected in an assignment before you write it than after it has been graded. Feel free to call me to ASK what an assignment is asking.
Student Name
Professor
Course Name
[e1]Date
Annotated Bibliography: Artifacts Readings[e2]
Motoko, Rich. "Literacy Debate: Online, R U Really Reading?" The New York Times. New
York Times, 27 July 2008. Web. 20 M.
riting About LiteratureGenerally, the essays you write in litera.docxdaniely50
riting About Literature
Generally, the essays you write in literature courses attempt to answer interesting questions about works of literature. These questions are interesting for at least two reasons: a) their answers are not obvious, and b) their answers (or at least the attempt to answer them) can enrich other readers’ understanding and experience of those works of literature. Often works of literature seem to be intentionally posing these questions to us; they require us to do some work to get them to work.
Readers have asked many different types of questions of works of literature, for example:
What did the author want to communicate in this work?
What does the work reveal about the author’s feelings, opinions, or psychology?
What does the work reveal about the society in which it was written?
What can we learn from this work about the issues or topics it deals with?
What motivates the characters in the work to behave as they do?
How are literary devices used in the work?
How does the work create emotional or intellectual experiences for its readers?
Is this work good or bad?
Is this work good or bad for its readers?
Some of these questions require information from outside the text itself; for example, to argue that a work reveals a writer’s psychological condition, it would be helpful to have some other evidence of that condition to corroborate your interpretation of the work of literature. Some of these questions ask about the world outside the work—about the author, his/her society, or our own society, for example—while others try to focus more on the features of the work itself.
Analyses which try to make statements about the work itself
is often called
formalist
criticism: it attends more to the structures and strategies employed in the work. Ultimately, such arguments generally do try to move beyond the work, to claim, for instance, that it is likely to create certain effects in its readers, or that readers will understand the writer’s intent more clearly if they pay attention to its formal characteristic.
In LIT 100, we are going to be paying attention primarily to these formal features of literary works. In fiction, some of these features include tone, point of view, setting, character, etc. We will be paying less attention to extra-textual features, such as the author’s biography or the historical contexts in which the literature was produced and/or read; these elements are not less important than formal features, but they naturally vary greatly from one work to another and often require in-depth study to truly appreciate. To understand how Shakespeare’s social situation in London in the 1590s might have been reflected in his plays would require a whole course in Elizabethan history. On the other hand, the formal features we will be studying in this course can be found in literature of all eras and genres, though they may often be used to different effect by different writers at different times. Almost all fict.
riting About LiteratureGenerally, the essays you write in lite.docxjoellemurphey
riting About Literature
Generally, the essays you write in literature courses attempt to answer interesting questions about works of literature. These questions are interesting for at least two reasons: a) their answers are not obvious, and b) their answers (or at least the attempt to answer them) can enrich other readers’ understanding and experience of those works of literature. Often works of literature seem to be intentionally posing these questions to us; they require us to do some work to get them to work.
Readers have asked many different types of questions of works of literature, for example:
· What did the author want to communicate in this work?
· What does the work reveal about the author’s feelings, opinions, or psychology?
· What does the work reveal about the society in which it was written?
· What can we learn from this work about the issues or topics it deals with?
· What motivates the characters in the work to behave as they do?
· How are literary devices used in the work?
· How does the work create emotional or intellectual experiences for its readers?
· Is this work good or bad?
· Is this work good or bad for its readers?
Some of these questions require information from outside the text itself; for example, to argue that a work reveals a writer’s psychological condition, it would be helpful to have some other evidence of that condition to corroborate your interpretation of the work of literature. Some of these questions ask about the world outside the work—about the author, his/her society, or our own society, for example—while others try to focus more on the features of the work itself. Analyses which try to make statements about the work itself is often calledformalist criticism: it attends more to the structures and strategies employed in the work. Ultimately, such arguments generally do try to move beyond the work, to claim, for instance, that it is likely to create certain effects in its readers, or that readers will understand the writer’s intent more clearly if they pay attention to its formal characteristic.
In LIT 100, we are going to be paying attention primarily to these formal features of literary works. In fiction, some of these features include tone, point of view, setting, character, etc. We will be paying less attention to extra-textual features, such as the author’s biography or the historical contexts in which the literature was produced and/or read; these elements are not less important than formal features, but they naturally vary greatly from one work to another and often require in-depth study to truly appreciate. To understand how Shakespeare’s social situation in London in the 1590s might have been reflected in his plays would require a whole course in Elizabethan history. On the other hand, the formal features we will be studying in this course can be found in literature of all eras and genres, though they may often be used to different effect by different writers at different times. A ...
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
1. What is an Annotated Bibliography? Abibliographyis a list of sources. Anannotationis a summary or an evaluation. Anannotated bibliography is a bibliography with a summary or evaluation of each source.
3. Summarize What are the main arguments of this source? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about, what would you say?
4. Assess How does this source compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?
5. Reflect Was this source helpful to you? How does it help you shape your argument? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic?
6. Format The bibliographic information (title, author, publisher, date, etc.) should be in MLA format. The annotations should be in paragraph form. Each annotation should be 5-8 sentences long and should summarize, assess and reflect.
7. Example Lamott, Anne. Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life. New York: Anchor Books, 1995. Print. Lamott'sbook offers honest advice on the nature of a writing life, complete with its insecurities and failures. Taking a humorous approach to the realities of being a writer, the chapters in Lamott's book are wry and anecdotal and offer advice on everything from plot development to jealousy, from perfectionism to struggling with one's own internal critic. In the process, Lamott includes writing exercises designed to be both productive and fun. Lamottoffers sane advice for those struggling with the anxieties of writing, but her main project seems to be offering the reader a reality check regarding writing, publishing, and struggling with one's own imperfect humanity in the process. Rather than a practical handbook to producing and/or publishing, this text is indispensable because of its honest perspective, its down-to-earth humor, and its encouraging approach. Chapters in this text could easily be included in the curriculum for a writing class. Several of the chapters in Part 1 address the writing process and would serve to generate discussion on students' own drafting and revising processes.
