Constructing fair tests that give teachers accurate information about students' learning is important. A table of specification helps organize test planning and content validity by determining what content will be covered. Rubrics can also help with validity when used appropriately. Multiple choice tests can be valid for assessing certain cognitive levels like knowledge and comprehension, but other assessment types may better measure skills and higher-level thinking. Teachers should consider cognitive level and learning objectives when choosing assessments.
This lesson, along with the succeeding ones, will all be about making / writing effective objective-type tests. In this presentation, the pre-service teacher will equip himself/herself with the needed knowledge to write short-answer and completion type test items.
This lesson, along with the succeeding ones, will all be about making / writing effective objective-type tests. In this presentation, the pre-service teacher will equip himself/herself with the needed knowledge to write short-answer and completion type test items.
Descriptive Indicators of Future Teachers’ Technology Integration in the PK-1...Joan E. Hughes, Ph.D.
This research examined preservice teacher graduates' positioning toward integrating technology in future teaching. Participants included 115 preservice teachers across three cohorts in 2008-2009 who graduated from a laptop-infused teacher education program. The study implemented a case study methodology that included a survey administered upon graduation.Indicators of positioning toward technology integration included: digital technology self-efficacy, attitude toward learning technologies, pedagogical perspective, personal/educational digital technology behaviors during the program, and TPACK knowledge used to rationalize their most valued technologies for future teaching. Results indicated graduates held moderate digital technology self-efficacy, positive attitude toward learning technologies,and moderate constructivist philosophy. During their preparation,productivity software activities were used most widely for educational purposes.Their most valued technologies for teaching subject matter were predominantly productivity software as well as general hardware, such as computers, projectors, and document cameras. They described teacher-centric uses three times more often than student-centered. Graduates showed low depth of TPACK. Teacher education programs need to consider the degree to which their candidates are exposed to a range of contemporary ICTs, especially content-specific ICTs, and the candidates' development of TPACK, which supports future technology-related instructional decision making. Such knowledge is developed across the teaching career, and technological induction programs may support continued TPACK development.Future research should employ longitudinal studies to understand TPACK development and use across novice and veteran teachers.
Descriptive Indicators of Future Teachers’ Technology Integration in the PK-1...Joan E. Hughes, Ph.D.
This research examined preservice teacher graduates' positioning toward integrating technology in future teaching. Participants included 115 preservice teachers across three cohorts in 2008-2009 who graduated from a laptop-infused teacher education program. The study implemented a case study methodology that included a survey administered upon graduation.Indicators of positioning toward technology integration included: digital technology self-efficacy, attitude toward learning technologies, pedagogical perspective, personal/educational digital technology behaviors during the program, and TPACK knowledge used to rationalize their most valued technologies for future teaching. Results indicated graduates held moderate digital technology self-efficacy, positive attitude toward learning technologies,and moderate constructivist philosophy. During their preparation,productivity software activities were used most widely for educational purposes.Their most valued technologies for teaching subject matter were predominantly productivity software as well as general hardware, such as computers, projectors, and document cameras. They described teacher-centric uses three times more often than student-centered. Graduates showed low depth of TPACK. Teacher education programs need to consider the degree to which their candidates are exposed to a range of contemporary ICTs, especially content-specific ICTs, and the candidates' development of TPACK, which supports future technology-related instructional decision making. Such knowledge is developed across the teaching career, and technological induction programs may support continued TPACK development.Future research should employ longitudinal studies to understand TPACK development and use across novice and veteran teachers.
FS6 Episode 3: The Teacher in a School SettingJamaica Olazo
My Concrete Experience
My Observations
My Affirmed Concepts
My Reflections
My Future Applications
Prepared by: Ms. JAMAICA OLAZO
Want to ask a copy on this, just reach me on my fb account:
https://www.facebook.com/jamFeb25
DON'T FORGET TO HIT LIKE or LEAVE A COMMENT BELOW.
Thanks :)
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your NicheLeslie Samuel
Are bloggers thought leaders? Here are some tips on how you can become one. Provide great value, put awesome content out there on a regular basis, and help others.
Hello!I will be focusing on the alignment of your instruction an.docxsalmonpybus
Hello!
I will be focusing on the alignment of your instruction and assessment to the state standards and also looking at the rigor you have built into your lesson. Please read the information below about the different parts of a lesson to help you when writing your own lesson plan.
Focus Activity: The Focus Activity typically a 5-10 min activity, discussion, review, video, etc. that serves to focus student attention on the topic of your lesson. It may also include an Anticipatory Set used to “hook” students or create interest in the topic.
Objective Statement: This statement is written using the verbiage you will use with the students.
It should relate to the targeted standard and include a performance behavior to ensure it is measurable. What will you ask students to do or produce to prove they are learning?
Purpose for Learning: Be sure to explain why it is important for students to learn what you are teaching them. I will be looking for you to include real-world application for the skill or content you are teaching about.
Instructional Steps: While my focus is not entirely on the instructional strategies you use, I will be looking at these as a means to assess the rigor of your lesson. Please be
VERY DETAILED in the Instructional Steps section. The idea behind this section is that another teacher would be able to pick up your lesson plan and implement it relatively seamlessly. Include the following in your Instructional Steps:
· Focus Activity and how you will tie it to your standard(s) &/or prior knowledge.
· Direct Instruction/Input – how will you present content? What questions will you ask or how will you guide/scaffold discussion to ensure the standards are being addressed? Remember that the goal is to utilize the Gradual Release Model, i.e. moving from “I do” to “We do” to “You do”. Include your modeling strategy and how you will provide both guided and independent practice for your students as they work towards mastery of the objective. Start with simple questioning during initial instructional input and modeling and lead to more complex critical thinking questions. Questions and activities should always consider and support varying levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. During Independent Practice, students should be working at higher Bloom’s levels and using higher order/critical thinking. To obtain the highest marks, questions and activities should be at the creative, evaluative and/or analysis levels that focus on the objective of the lesson and provoke thought and discussion. Again, be very detailed and include the exact questions you will ask, clarifications you will make to avoid common misconceptions and discussion topics you will introduce.
Questions for Understanding: This is where you will list some examples of the questions you will ask. Remember to include questions at the various levels of Bloom’s. I will be looking for the integration of .
The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of "rubric" in language testing and assessment and to highlight the parts of a rubric through various dimensions. Moreover, it sets forth in creating awareness of the effective use of rubrics in measuring multiple dimensions of students' learning and in reflecting robustness of this critical assessment process.
1. For your first question, a Table of Specification (TOS) is very important in the content for
validity of test as it puts the one who gave the test and the candidate on the same
footing. This means that both are thinking of the same question, item, specification and
other details. This is very important when giving tests that has tendencies of multiple
interpretations. For the second question, a multiple type of question may be a good way
to determine to know a person`s quality of learning but may not be very applicable to a
set of manipulative skills. The best way to test a person`s manipulative skill is to do an
actual demonstration. The same type of demo is required for other manipulative test like
getting a driver`s license. In your case, if you want to know a person`s skills on the
microscope, have an actual test. Give him or her a microscope with a subject on it, then
give him or her instructions and let him or her write what are his observation for every
instruction.
With your question "Is a multiple choice type of test valid to determine learning
assessment strategies?” the answer is dependent. Validity means that a test must
measure what is supposed to be measured. That`s right. In order for a test to be valid,
the purpose should be achieved. What is the purpose? The purpose is your objectives.
If your objective is to determine learning assessment strategies, you should first know
what level of cognitive domain you want. The levels of cognitive domain of Bloom`s
taxonomy are Knowledge, Comprehension, Analysis, Application, Synthesis, and
Evaluation. If the objective is under the knowledge level, the test should also be under
the knowledge level. Each test item should be analyzed in order to determine if the right
level of cognitive domain is achieved. Multiple Choice, True or False, Matching Type is
best for Knowledge, Comprehension, Analysis, and Application levels. Essays are best
for Synthesis level. In other words, multiple choices can be a valid type of test if the
items achieved the correct cognitive domain it is supposed to be in. If you want to
determine learning assessment strategies, analysis and application are the best levels
in the cognitive domain to use. You will be able to apply these levels in the multiple
choice type of test if you provide real-life situations in classroom assessment. This way,
a multiple choice type of test would be valid. Source: If validity as a characteristic of test
means that a test must measure what is supposed to measure, is a multiple choice type
of valid to determine le?
Constructing fair tests that give teachers accurate information about students learning is
an important skill for teachers. The table of specification is often useful to organize the
planning process of designing test allows the teacher to predetermine the content of the
test. Using a table of specification to organize a teacher - made test helps alleviate
content validity problems because it helps the teacher create good balance in several
areas.
2. Measurement Validity- There's an awful lot of confusion in the methodological
literature that stems from the wide variety of labels that are used to describe the validity
of measures. I want to make two cases here. First, it's dumb to limit our scope only to
the validity of measures. We really want to talk about the validity of any
operationalization. That is, any time you translate a concept or construct into a
functioning and operating reality (the operationalization), you need to be concerned
about how well you did the translation. This issue is as relevant when we are talking
about treatments or programs as it is when we are talking about measures. (In fact,
come to think of it, we could also think of sampling in this way. The population of
interest in your study is the "construct" and the sample is your operationalization. If we
think of it this way, we are essentially talking about the construct validity of the
sampling!). Second, I want to use the term construct validity to refer to the general case
of translating any construct into an operationalization. Let's use all of the other validity
terms to reflect different ways you can demonstrate different aspects of construct
validity.
Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
Cognitive Domain
1. Knowledge (Remembering previously learned material)
Educational Psychology: Give the definition of punishment.
Mathematics: State the formula for the area of a circle.
English / Language Arts: Recite a poem.
2. Comprehension (Grasping the meaning of material)
Educational Psychology: Paraphrase in your own words the definition of punishment; answer
questions about the meaning of punishment.
Mathematics: Given the mathematical formula for the area of a circle, paraphrase it using your
own words.
English / Language Arts: Explain what a poem means.
3. Application (Using information in concrete situations)
Educational Psychology: Given an anecdote describing a teaching situation, identify examples
of punishment.
3. Mathematics: Compute the area of actual circles.
English / Language Arts: Identify examples of metaphors in a poem.
4. Analysis (Breaking down material into parts)
Educational Psychology: Given an anecdote describing a teaching situation, identify the
psychological strategies intentionally or accidentally employed.
Mathematics: Given a math word problem, determine the strategies that would be necessary to
solve it.
English / Language Arts: Given a poem, identify the specific poetic strategies employed in it.
5. Synthesis (Putting parts together into a whole)
Educational Psychology: Apply the strategies learned in educational psychology in an organized
manner to solve an educational problem.
Mathematics: Apply and integrate several different strategies to solve a mathematical problem.
English / Language Arts: Write an essay or a poem.
6. Evaluation (Judging the value of a product for a given purpose, using definite criteria)
Educational Psychology: Observe another teacher (or yourself) and determine the quality of the
teaching performance in terms of the teacher's appropriate application of principles of
educational psychology.
Mathematics: When you have finished solving a problem (or when a peer has done so) determine
the degree to which that problem was solved as efficiently as possible.
English / Language Arts: Analyze your own or a peer's essay in terms of the principles of
composition discussed during the semester.
When to Use a Rubric
Rubrics are expensive in terms of the time and energy they require to design and implement. The
decision to use a rubric must be weighed carefully. Rubrics are best suited for situations where a
wide range of variation exists between what’s considered very proficient and what’s considered
not yet proficient.
Teachers have found rubrics to be every useful in providing guidance and feedback to students
where skills and processes are the targets being monitored. Examples of skills or processes that
adapt well to being rubriced include: the writing process, the application of the method of
scientific inquiry, thinking skills (i.e. constructing support, compare, problem solving, etc.), and
life-long learner skills (i.e. collaborative worker, quality producer, etc.).
4. Methods other than rubrics are more conducive to monitoring quantities or amounts of factual
information known by a learner. These methods may include tests, quizzes, checklists, etc.
Helpful Hint: Don’t rubric everything. Some teachers reserve rubrics for processes and skills in
which students are having difficulty demonstrating a high degree of proficiency. Others use
rubrics to scaffold new performance tasks or introduce new skills and processes. However, or
whenever, the decision is made to use a rubric, best results usually occur when students are
involved in the work of designing a rubric, as well as in the feedback loop and in the reporting-
out to stakeholders process, (i.e., parents, school board members, community, etc.).
Analytic Rubrics
An analytic rubric resembles a grid or matrix in which the criteria representing the essential
learning being assessed is organized in the leftmost column and the levels of achievement are
represented in the top row.
Analytic rubrics can be created in Excel (and information can easily be aggregated and
numerically summarized), with Word's table function, or even just sketched out on a pad of
paper. Additionally there are several free (though generally registration is required) on-line
generators for rubric creation including iRubric and Rubistar. Regardless of the medium used
for creating a rubric the steps are the same.
The following steps illustrate how an analytical rubric is created.
1. Determine the various skills and abilities that students should demonstrate to show
achievement of the learning outcome(s). These skills and abilities are the various criteria.
Each criterion should focus on a different skill identified by a phrase or brief statement,
and each criterion should be measureable through the examination of student work. The
criteria become the leftmost column of the grid.
2. The next step is to determine the levels of achievement possible given the expectations
of what students are to be able to demonstrate. The levels can be numerical categories
but more frequently are descriptions, sometimes with an associated number. It is at this
stage that the number of columns is determined and the levels of achievement are listed
across the top row.
3. The next step in the creation of an analytic rubric is to create descriptions for the criteria
along each level of achievement. While sometimes this step is skipped, this is not
5. recommended as the descriptions are valuable for helping to increase reliability among
multiple raters and even for a single rater as s/he assesses the work of different students.
Holistic Rubrics
When using a holistic rubric the assessor judges the level of performance across all criteria
together, instead of separately as is done with an analytic rubric. The steps for creating a
holistic rubric are similar to that of the analytical, but do not describe each criteria and level of
achievement separately as the scorer will be selecting one holistic score for the entire
assignment rather than separate scores for each criterion. In general holistic rubrics are
considered faster to create and implement, however, they do not facilitate analysis and
feedback in the same way as analytical rubrics.
1. Determine all the skills and abilities students need to demonstrate in order to achieve the
learning outcome.
Clarity, organization, and grammar.
2. Determine the appropriate levels of accomplishment.
Needs improvement, developing, sufficient, and above average.
4. Write an overall description of how a student would demonstrate the learning outcome
for each level of accomplishment. When creating a holistic rubric this step cannot be
skipped.
Advantages of Rubrics in General
1. Forces the teacher to clarify criteria in detail.
2. Useful feedback for the effectiveness of instruction.
3 .Motivates students to reach the standards specified.
4. Narrows the gap between instruction and assessment.
5. Flexible tool, having uses across many contexts, in many grade levels and for a wide range of
abilities.
6. Potential to be transferred into grades if necessary.
7. Can offer a method of consistency in scoring by clearly defining the performance criteria.
6. 8. Giving the child more control of their own learning process.
9. Potential to open communication with caregivers.
Disadvantages of Rubrics in General
1.Rubrics can also restrict the students mind power in that they will feel that they need to
complete the assignment strictly to the rubric instead of taking the initiative to explore their
learning.
2. If the criteria that is in the rubric is too complex, students may feel overwhelmed with the
assignment, and little success may be imminent.
3. For the teacher creating the rubric, they may find the task of developing, testing, evaluating,
and updating time consuming.
What benefits have scoring brought to the teaching learning process?
Scoring rubric means in education terminology "a standard of performance for a defined
population". Scoring rubrics are used to delineate consistent criteria for grading wherein the
criteria are public, this allows teachers and students alike to evaluate criteria, which can be
complex and subjective. It can also provide a basis for self-evaluation, reflection, and peer
review. Its aim is to have accurate and fair assessment, fostering understanding, and indicating
a way to proceed with subsequent learning-teaching process.
Scoring rubrics help the teacher to show the students what the goals are and let the students
understand why they were given such grade or score. The students will be able to grasp an
understanding of their performance in contrast with the prescribed criteria. It will be easier for
the teacher to maintain a standard that students should adhere to.
BOON OR BANE?
Of course, Boon, because it helps to grade the students fairly and just and it can offer also a
method of consistency in scoring by clearly defining the performance criteria. Boon of
course...developments can never be bane for anyone.....Yes there are good and bad ways to
conduct a development...but if its sustainable it is the best.....i think you have watched too
much fictional movies like terminator i guess.. It is a boon. Believe me there is a still a lot dearth
for doctors especially in the suburbs and taluk places. Quality doctors will mean quality health
care. But the key to achieving this success would be to increase the no. Of pg seats too.
7. They are definitely a good thing when implemented and used properly. Of course, if you have a
terrible rubric then this is not useful. It`s usually best when someone directly involved in
working with the students who knows what they can achieve and what they are learning has a
hand in making the rubric.
Rubrics are used to assess how well a student is doing, academically, in certain areas. They are
administered by teachers. Boon means the usefulness of the scoring rubrics in the classroom.
Bane means the something that cause not useful to used it in the classroom.
OBSERVED IN MAKING RUBRICS
In making and using score rubrics. first you must have objectives included in the rubrics for a
specific activity. a rubric must be definitive, quantitative and objective in nature. the scoring
rubric is a device that guides you to keep track the corresponding score or credits that you may
give to a particular task.
RELATED TO FORTFOLIO
Scoring Rubrics is related to portfolio assessment because we rated the performance of a
student such as giving them portfolio which compiled their written reports and so on.
DIFFICULTY FOR TEACHER
Rubrics are important basis for a performance tests, projects or output of the students. A
teacher may experience difficulty in adapting rubrics which do not measure the target learning
outputs of the students. There will be mismatch between what you taught them and how do
you measure their performance. It is best for teacher to review the criteria and scoring of
rubrics to match the learning outputs versus the learning assessments.