The document discusses air pollution control laws, regulations, and philosophies, emphasizing the significance of preventing air pollution to protect public health. It outlines various control measures and permit requirements for facilities, including federal mandates for emissions standards and the promotion of cleaner fuel technologies. Additionally, it explores economic philosophies around emission taxes and cost-benefit approaches as methods for managing air quality and minimizing pollution impacts.

1. Air Pollution Control Laws
and Regulations
&
Air Pollution Control Philosophies

2. • Air Pollution, its causes and effects, cost of air pollution
• Air Pollution control Laws and Regulations
• Air Pollution Control Philosophies

3. Air Pollution is not a joke. Air Pollution
will make you Choke

6. Air Pollution

10. • Most air pollution control engineers works with permits and also the
major facilities
• These permits are authorized by local, state, or federal authorities,
normally, expressed as:
• The emissions of pollutant X from the main stack factory Y shall not
exceed Z pound per hours

11. • Federal regulations direct the states to require a permit for each
facility that has the potential to emit 100 tons/ Yr of criteria
pollutants and 25 ton/ Yr of Hazardous pollutants.

12. • If the facility (emitter) is located in a severely polluted area, then the
values become smaller.
• Automobiles and gasoline emissions are directly regulated by the EPA
• Automobile industry needs State and EPA permits

14. Programs and Activities
• Air Quality and Emissions Limitations
• This section of the act declares that protecting and enhancing the
nation's air quality promotes public health
• The law encourages prevention of regional air pollution and control
programs
• It also provides technical and financial assistance for air pollution
prevention at both state and local governments

15. • Clean Fuel Vehicles
• The Clean Fuel Vehicle programs focused on
alternative fuel use and petroleum fuels that met
low emission vehicle (LEV) levels
• Compressed natural gas, ethanol, methanol,
liquefied petroleum gas and electricity are examples
of cleaner alternative fuel
• Programs such as the California Clean Fuels Program
and pilot program are increasing demand that for
new fuels to be developed to reduce harmful
emissions

18. (cleanest possible air philosophy)

20.  Example: England 1863
 Leblanc factory for soda ash (Na2CO3)
 Large amounts of byproduct (HCl) were emitted as vapor
 HCl devastated the vegetation = problems with the industry
Alkali-inspectors found the best technique to reduce emissions at
the factory level
 The technique was enforced on all other factories emitting HCl

21. 

22.  This philosophy was the basis of most air pollution control activities
between 1863 and 1970
 Recent air pollution laws – 2 sections are pure emission standards

23. New Source Performance
Standard (NSPS)
 It blocks a firm from “pollution
shopping” = searching for the
least stringent air pollution
standard state
 Any regulation standard below
the NSPS leads to a polluted air
National Emissions Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP)
 This regulation covers
pollutants which causes harm
without any threshold
Better to apply the toughest
control procedures to limit
emissions

30. The next two philosophies represent future alternatives.
Laws based on an emission tax philosophy would tax each
emitter of major pollutants according to its emission rate; – e.g.
X cents per pound of pollutant Y for all emitters.
This tax rate would be set so that most major polluters would
find it more economical to install pollution control equipment
than pay the taxes.

31. The emission tax philosophy assumes that the environment has
natural removal mechanisms for pollutants, with CFC’s as a
possible exception.
Emission taxes have also been proposed in combination with
air quality standard philosophy : in this combination, emission
taxes would act as an added incentive to reduce emissions to
lower levels than those required to meet air quality standards.
This philosophy also assume that for any contamination, the
environment has a renewable absorptive and/or dispersive
capacities.

33. The cost-benefit philosophy assumes that there are no
thresholds at all or there are very low thresholds.
This philosophy suggests
How much damage can we stand
 How much we are willing to spend to control damage
beyond the tolerance
The aim of this philosophy is to solve cost-benefit minimization.
It is highly cost-effective.

34. Cost distribution
If pollutants are emitted by autos
–Cost and damages are distributed on the population
If the emitter is an industry
–It can injure the rest of the community
–Costs will be unequally distributed

36. The figure is great simplification,
 it shows one control cost curve
 One damage cost curve
 And one atmospheric concentration
In reality there is:
 a damage curve for each individual exposed to air pollution
 Control curve for each emitter
 And concentration dimension for each pollutant at each
location

37.  The simple application shown in the figure does not consider
the question :
“ Whose costs? Whose benefits? ‘’

38. What is a perfect philosophy?