Addie vs Dick & Carey Models
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•76 views
This document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick & Carey instructional design models. The ADDIE model is a linear 5-step approach, while the Dick & Carey model is iterative with 10 steps. Both have components for analysis, design, and evaluation, but the Dick & Carey model incorporates formative evaluation at each step. The advantages of ADDIE include its simplicity and dynamic nature, while its disadvantage is evaluation only at the end. Dick & Carey's advantages are its focus on crafting learning plans and allowing early adjustments, while its disadvantage is having too many steps.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Addie vs dick and carey instructional design models
The document compares the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. Both models include analysis, design, development, and evaluation phases. However, the ADDIE model is linear with 5 stages, while the Dick and Carey model has 10 phases and focuses more on pretesting. The ADDIE model is flexible and widely used, while the Dick and Carey model has more measurable learning objectives but can be rigid. In conclusion, the main difference is the number of steps, but both models are effective.
Compare & Contrast ADDIE and Dick and Carey Models
A look at the similarities and differences between ADDIE and Dick and Carey Instructional Design Models
Addie model vs-dick carey model
Both the ADDIE and CAREY models are instructional design models that help organize the process of developing instruction. The ADDIE model is a linear 5-phase model (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation) while the CAREY model has 10 iterative phases and includes more detailed analysis. Both models focus on input, output, and the design process as a system. The key difference is that ADDIE is more linear while CAREY is more iterative and includes ongoing evaluation between phases.
Compare addie to dick carey slideshare by Johanna Kampp
This document compares the Dick and Carey instructional design model to the ADDIE model. Both models follow a systems approach of analysis, design, development, and evaluation phases. The key differences are that the Dick and Carey model has nine phases compared to ADDIE's five phases, and it includes two evaluation steps rather than just one at the end. The ADDIE model is more broadly applicable but less agile, while the Dick and Carey model emphasizes goals, objectives, and testing but does not focus as much on implementation.
Compare & Contrast ADDIE and Dick and Carey Models
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. Both models follow a systematic process and include analysis, design, development, and evaluation phases. However, the ADDIE model has 5 phases and is more flexible while the Dick and Carey model has 10 detailed steps and emphasizes formative evaluation. While either model can be effective for instructional design, the ADDIE is more commonly used in business environments and the Dick and Carey is popular for educational settings.
Comparison and Contrast of ADDIE and Dick and Carey Models
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model is linear and comprises five stages (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation), while the Dick and Carey model has 10 iterative stages and incorporates evaluation throughout. Both provide frameworks for designing effective training, but the Dick and Carey model is more detailed and flexible for experienced designers, while ADDIE is more commonly used and structured.
Compare and Contrast ADDIE Model to Dick and Carey Model
The ADDIE model and Dick and Carey model are both instructional design models that use a systems approach. The ADDIE model has 5 phases - Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. The Dick and Carey model has 10 more detailed phases and incorporates evaluation throughout the process rather than just in the final phase like ADDIE. While both are linear and emphasize evaluation, the Dick and Carey model has more phases and is more detailed in its approach.
Difference of Instructional Design Models
A quick review of what instructional designs are. The Similarities and Difference Comparison between ADDIE and Dick and Carey models.
Recommended
Addie vs dick and carey instructional design models
The document compares the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. Both models include analysis, design, development, and evaluation phases. However, the ADDIE model is linear with 5 stages, while the Dick and Carey model has 10 phases and focuses more on pretesting. The ADDIE model is flexible and widely used, while the Dick and Carey model has more measurable learning objectives but can be rigid. In conclusion, the main difference is the number of steps, but both models are effective.
Compare & Contrast ADDIE and Dick and Carey Models
A look at the similarities and differences between ADDIE and Dick and Carey Instructional Design Models
Addie model vs-dick carey model
Both the ADDIE and CAREY models are instructional design models that help organize the process of developing instruction. The ADDIE model is a linear 5-phase model (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation) while the CAREY model has 10 iterative phases and includes more detailed analysis. Both models focus on input, output, and the design process as a system. The key difference is that ADDIE is more linear while CAREY is more iterative and includes ongoing evaluation between phases.
Compare addie to dick carey slideshare by Johanna Kampp
This document compares the Dick and Carey instructional design model to the ADDIE model. Both models follow a systems approach of analysis, design, development, and evaluation phases. The key differences are that the Dick and Carey model has nine phases compared to ADDIE's five phases, and it includes two evaluation steps rather than just one at the end. The ADDIE model is more broadly applicable but less agile, while the Dick and Carey model emphasizes goals, objectives, and testing but does not focus as much on implementation.
Compare & Contrast ADDIE and Dick and Carey Models
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. Both models follow a systematic process and include analysis, design, development, and evaluation phases. However, the ADDIE model has 5 phases and is more flexible while the Dick and Carey model has 10 detailed steps and emphasizes formative evaluation. While either model can be effective for instructional design, the ADDIE is more commonly used in business environments and the Dick and Carey is popular for educational settings.
Comparison and Contrast of ADDIE and Dick and Carey Models
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model is linear and comprises five stages (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation), while the Dick and Carey model has 10 iterative stages and incorporates evaluation throughout. Both provide frameworks for designing effective training, but the Dick and Carey model is more detailed and flexible for experienced designers, while ADDIE is more commonly used and structured.
Compare and Contrast ADDIE Model to Dick and Carey Model
The ADDIE model and Dick and Carey model are both instructional design models that use a systems approach. The ADDIE model has 5 phases - Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. The Dick and Carey model has 10 more detailed phases and incorporates evaluation throughout the process rather than just in the final phase like ADDIE. While both are linear and emphasize evaluation, the Dick and Carey model has more phases and is more detailed in its approach.
Difference of Instructional Design Models
A quick review of what instructional designs are. The Similarities and Difference Comparison between ADDIE and Dick and Carey models.
Who The Heck Is ADDIE Anyway
The document introduces the ADDIE model of instructional design which includes the steps of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. It encourages analyzing learners and their systems, designing clear goals and objectives, developing instruction aligned to those goals, implementing and revising instruction based on formative and summative evaluations to improve learning.
ADDIE versus DICK and CAREY
The document compares and contrasts two common instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. Both models follow similar steps - identifying learning objectives, developing content, implementing learning, and evaluating outcomes. However, the ADDIE model is a linear process while Dick and Carey is more flexible, iterative systems approach. Key differences include where evaluation occurs and how many phases each model contains.
Addie model
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model, which are two instructional design models. The ADDIE model consists of 5 sequential phases - analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The Dick and Carey model promotes a systems view of instruction and has 10 phases including identifying goals, analyzing learners/contexts, developing objectives, and conducting formative and summative evaluations. Both models focus on input, output, and an iterative process. A key difference is the Dick and Carey model has more detailed phases and two stages of evaluation.
Instructional Design : ADDIE Model vs Dick & Carey Model
This SlideShare was uploaded as a assignment for Barry University - HRD 647 - DIGITAL DESIGN FOR E-LEARNING by Tyronella Ferguson
The slides compare and contrast two well known instructional design theories, the ADDIE Model vs Dick & Carey Model. The slide deck briefly highlights pros, cons, similarities and differences in these models.
Digital diligence: guidance on using 'unsupported' tools
Matthew Deeprose created guidance for staff at the University of Southampton on using unsupported tools. He developed an overview document and criteria for assessing tools. The overview explains that staff should check if the university already has a similar supported tool before using others. It also covers issues like data privacy, sustainability, copyright and accessibility to consider. Matthew drafted criteria like tools must be free-to-use without time limits, not require personal information, and meet accessibility standards. He shared the overview with staff for feedback to refine the guidance.
ADDIE & Dick and Carey
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: ADDIE and the Dick and Carey model. Both models follow a systematic approach of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. However, the Dick and Carey model has more detailed steps that are interrelated compared to ADDIE's linear 5 phases. Additionally, the Dick and Carey model incorporates formative evaluation throughout and a final summative evaluation, while ADDIE focuses evaluation at the end. Both models have benefits like flexibility but can also be time-consuming and challenging to apply depending on variables.
Design models
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey instructional design model. The ADDIE model is a linear 5-stage process of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. It provides structured guidance and flexibility. However, it can be time consuming and assume learner requirements are already understood. The Dick and Carey model has more detailed iterative phases and focuses on analyzing, organizing content, and evaluating throughout the process. However, it may be too specific, rigid, and not use all necessary steps. Both models take a systematic approach and share similarities in focusing on inputs, outputs, and the design process, but differ in their number of phases and approach to evaluation.
Traditional and ID Addie Model vs Dick & Carel Model
Slideshow demonstrating what the Traditional & ID Addie Model and Dick & Carey Model consist of as well as showcasing their differences and similarities.
Robert hillis instructional_design
This document discusses instructional design models and approaches. It describes the Dick and Carey systematic approach, which outlines 9 components for developing instruction from assessing needs to revising instruction based on evaluation. Another model discussed is rapid prototyping, which involves continual design-evaluation cycles. Both models have strengths and weaknesses - Dick and Carey can be more tedious while rapid prototyping moves quickly, and the best approach depends on the specific instructional situation and needs.
Vardhan cvv (2)
Kirti Vardhan Verma completed his graduation from Kurukshetra Institute of Management and Technology in 2015. He developed two academic projects - a DPR system to track student and staff attendance and activities at his college, and a fashion merchandising website. He has experience with Microsoft .NET and Oracle DBA from industrial trainings. His skills include ASP.NET, SQL Server, and he is hard-working with a flexible approach.
Digital Design comparaison
The document discusses and compares two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model consists of 5 sequential stages - analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. In contrast, the Dick and Carey model has 10 iterative phases and emphasizes clear, measurable learning objectives. Both models take a systems approach but differ in their number of steps and evaluation processes. Overall, the document concludes that both models can be useful tools for instructional designers to create concise and engaging training materials.
ADDIE v.pptx
The ADDIE model is linear and flexible but time-consuming, while the Dick and Carey model requires clear objectives and iterations but assumes all components are essential. Both aim to develop systematic instruction through analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation phases, but the Dick and Carey model provides more detail and evaluates throughout each phase.
Compare and Contrast the ADDIE to Dick and.pptx
Compare and Contrast the ADDIE Model to Dick and Carey Model
What is fundamentally the same with each model and likewise, what is different? Identify at least one advantage and one challenge that each ID model presents when compared to each other.
Models of Instructional Design
This document compares two common models of instructional design: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model consists of five sequential phases - Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate. It is widely used but can limit creativity. The Dick and Carey model is also called the Systems Approach Model. It is a 10-step process used often in education that includes ongoing formative and summative evaluations. Both models are systematic in their approach and focus on inputs, outputs, and the design process, but the Dick and Carey model has more steps and allows for incremental improvements.
ADDIE Model + Dick and Carey Model
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey instructional systems design models. Both models consist of phases to gather information and establish learning goals. The ADDIE model has five linear phases, while the Dick and Carey model has ten more detailed and flexible phases with evaluation conducted in each. The ADDIE model is commonly used for curriculum development and provides structured training guidance, while the Dick and Carey model is used more in business and assumes learning can be predictable. Both models recognize the importance of evaluation but differ in when it is conducted.
Compare & Contrast ADDIE and Dick and Carey Models
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. Both models follow a systematic process and include analysis, design, development, and evaluation phases. However, the ADDIE model has 5 phases and is more flexible while the Dick and Carey model has 10 detailed steps and emphasizes formative evaluation. While either model can be effective for instructional design, the ADDIE model is more commonly used in business and the Dick and Carey model is preferred in educational settings.
ADDIE to Dick and Carey Model
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. The ADDIE model is a traditional 5-phase linear model of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. In contrast, the Dick and Carey model promotes a systems view of instruction and includes more detailed phases such as identifying instructional goals and conducting formative and summative evaluations. A key difference is that the Dick and Carey model incorporates evaluation throughout the process, while ADDIE only evaluates at the final phase. Both models aim to systematically design effective instruction but take different approaches.
The ADDIE model vs The Dick Carey Model
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. Both models follow a systematic process and include formative evaluation steps. The key differences are that the Dick and Carey model has more detailed steps and incorporates evaluation throughout each phase, while ADDIE includes evaluation as its own final phase. The ADDIE model is more flexible but can deter creativity. The Dick and Carey model requires clear learning objectives but assumes all components are essential.
Addie vs Dick & Carey ppt
The document compares the ADDIE and Dick & Carey instructional design models. The ADDIE model has 5 stages - analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. It is flexible but can be time consuming. The Dick & Carey model has 10 more specific stages including identifying goals, analyzing instruction, developing materials, and conducting formative and summative evaluations. Both models focus on input, process, and output, but the Dick & Carey model is more agile and integrates evaluation throughout.
Addie Model vs Dick and Carey Model
The document compares the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. Both models include analysis, assessments, design, and evaluations. However, the ADDIE model has fewer steps (five total) than the Dick and Carey model (ten steps). Additionally, the ADDIE model is linear while the Dick and Carey model is iterative with evaluations occurring at each step. The key advantages and challenges of each model are also discussed.
Addie versus Dick and Carey
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. Both models are process oriented and goal oriented, focusing on learner needs and utilizing assessments. The main differences are that ADDIE has 5 linear steps with evaluation at the end, while Dick and Carey has 10 interactive steps with ongoing evaluation. ADDIE is more flexible across industries, while Dick and Carey is best for educational settings. Each model offers advantages like structured approaches, but also challenges like time consumption.
ADDIE & Dick Carey Model Presentation.pptx
This document compares and contrasts the ADDIE model and Dick and Carey instructional design models. The ADDIE model is a 5-step process used to plan effective learning experiences, while the Dick and Carey model has 10 steps and is more commonly used for educational platforms. Both models take a systematic approach and include analysis and evaluation stages. The ADDIE model is more linear while Dick and Carey is more iterative. The ADDIE model is more commonly used but less flexible, while Dick and Carey is more detailed but requires more time.
More Related Content
What's hot
Who The Heck Is ADDIE Anyway
The document introduces the ADDIE model of instructional design which includes the steps of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. It encourages analyzing learners and their systems, designing clear goals and objectives, developing instruction aligned to those goals, implementing and revising instruction based on formative and summative evaluations to improve learning.
ADDIE versus DICK and CAREY
The document compares and contrasts two common instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. Both models follow similar steps - identifying learning objectives, developing content, implementing learning, and evaluating outcomes. However, the ADDIE model is a linear process while Dick and Carey is more flexible, iterative systems approach. Key differences include where evaluation occurs and how many phases each model contains.
Addie model
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model, which are two instructional design models. The ADDIE model consists of 5 sequential phases - analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The Dick and Carey model promotes a systems view of instruction and has 10 phases including identifying goals, analyzing learners/contexts, developing objectives, and conducting formative and summative evaluations. Both models focus on input, output, and an iterative process. A key difference is the Dick and Carey model has more detailed phases and two stages of evaluation.
Instructional Design : ADDIE Model vs Dick & Carey Model
This SlideShare was uploaded as a assignment for Barry University - HRD 647 - DIGITAL DESIGN FOR E-LEARNING by Tyronella Ferguson
The slides compare and contrast two well known instructional design theories, the ADDIE Model vs Dick & Carey Model. The slide deck briefly highlights pros, cons, similarities and differences in these models.
Digital diligence: guidance on using 'unsupported' tools
Matthew Deeprose created guidance for staff at the University of Southampton on using unsupported tools. He developed an overview document and criteria for assessing tools. The overview explains that staff should check if the university already has a similar supported tool before using others. It also covers issues like data privacy, sustainability, copyright and accessibility to consider. Matthew drafted criteria like tools must be free-to-use without time limits, not require personal information, and meet accessibility standards. He shared the overview with staff for feedback to refine the guidance.
ADDIE & Dick and Carey
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: ADDIE and the Dick and Carey model. Both models follow a systematic approach of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. However, the Dick and Carey model has more detailed steps that are interrelated compared to ADDIE's linear 5 phases. Additionally, the Dick and Carey model incorporates formative evaluation throughout and a final summative evaluation, while ADDIE focuses evaluation at the end. Both models have benefits like flexibility but can also be time-consuming and challenging to apply depending on variables.
Design models
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey instructional design model. The ADDIE model is a linear 5-stage process of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. It provides structured guidance and flexibility. However, it can be time consuming and assume learner requirements are already understood. The Dick and Carey model has more detailed iterative phases and focuses on analyzing, organizing content, and evaluating throughout the process. However, it may be too specific, rigid, and not use all necessary steps. Both models take a systematic approach and share similarities in focusing on inputs, outputs, and the design process, but differ in their number of phases and approach to evaluation.
Traditional and ID Addie Model vs Dick & Carel Model
Slideshow demonstrating what the Traditional & ID Addie Model and Dick & Carey Model consist of as well as showcasing their differences and similarities.
Robert hillis instructional_design
This document discusses instructional design models and approaches. It describes the Dick and Carey systematic approach, which outlines 9 components for developing instruction from assessing needs to revising instruction based on evaluation. Another model discussed is rapid prototyping, which involves continual design-evaluation cycles. Both models have strengths and weaknesses - Dick and Carey can be more tedious while rapid prototyping moves quickly, and the best approach depends on the specific instructional situation and needs.
Vardhan cvv (2)
Kirti Vardhan Verma completed his graduation from Kurukshetra Institute of Management and Technology in 2015. He developed two academic projects - a DPR system to track student and staff attendance and activities at his college, and a fashion merchandising website. He has experience with Microsoft .NET and Oracle DBA from industrial trainings. His skills include ASP.NET, SQL Server, and he is hard-working with a flexible approach.
What's hot (10)
Instructional Design : ADDIE Model vs Dick & Carey Model
Instructional Design : ADDIE Model vs Dick & Carey Model
Digital diligence: guidance on using 'unsupported' tools
Digital diligence: guidance on using 'unsupported' tools
Traditional and ID Addie Model vs Dick & Carel Model
Traditional and ID Addie Model vs Dick & Carel Model
Similar to Addie vs Dick & Carey Models
Digital Design comparaison
The document discusses and compares two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model consists of 5 sequential stages - analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. In contrast, the Dick and Carey model has 10 iterative phases and emphasizes clear, measurable learning objectives. Both models take a systems approach but differ in their number of steps and evaluation processes. Overall, the document concludes that both models can be useful tools for instructional designers to create concise and engaging training materials.
ADDIE v.pptx
The ADDIE model is linear and flexible but time-consuming, while the Dick and Carey model requires clear objectives and iterations but assumes all components are essential. Both aim to develop systematic instruction through analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation phases, but the Dick and Carey model provides more detail and evaluates throughout each phase.
Compare and Contrast the ADDIE to Dick and.pptx
Compare and Contrast the ADDIE Model to Dick and Carey Model
What is fundamentally the same with each model and likewise, what is different? Identify at least one advantage and one challenge that each ID model presents when compared to each other.
Models of Instructional Design
This document compares two common models of instructional design: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model consists of five sequential phases - Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate. It is widely used but can limit creativity. The Dick and Carey model is also called the Systems Approach Model. It is a 10-step process used often in education that includes ongoing formative and summative evaluations. Both models are systematic in their approach and focus on inputs, outputs, and the design process, but the Dick and Carey model has more steps and allows for incremental improvements.
ADDIE Model + Dick and Carey Model
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey instructional systems design models. Both models consist of phases to gather information and establish learning goals. The ADDIE model has five linear phases, while the Dick and Carey model has ten more detailed and flexible phases with evaluation conducted in each. The ADDIE model is commonly used for curriculum development and provides structured training guidance, while the Dick and Carey model is used more in business and assumes learning can be predictable. Both models recognize the importance of evaluation but differ in when it is conducted.
Compare & Contrast ADDIE and Dick and Carey Models
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. Both models follow a systematic process and include analysis, design, development, and evaluation phases. However, the ADDIE model has 5 phases and is more flexible while the Dick and Carey model has 10 detailed steps and emphasizes formative evaluation. While either model can be effective for instructional design, the ADDIE model is more commonly used in business and the Dick and Carey model is preferred in educational settings.
ADDIE to Dick and Carey Model
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. The ADDIE model is a traditional 5-phase linear model of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. In contrast, the Dick and Carey model promotes a systems view of instruction and includes more detailed phases such as identifying instructional goals and conducting formative and summative evaluations. A key difference is that the Dick and Carey model incorporates evaluation throughout the process, while ADDIE only evaluates at the final phase. Both models aim to systematically design effective instruction but take different approaches.
The ADDIE model vs The Dick Carey Model
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. Both models follow a systematic process and include formative evaluation steps. The key differences are that the Dick and Carey model has more detailed steps and incorporates evaluation throughout each phase, while ADDIE includes evaluation as its own final phase. The ADDIE model is more flexible but can deter creativity. The Dick and Carey model requires clear learning objectives but assumes all components are essential.
Addie vs Dick & Carey ppt
The document compares the ADDIE and Dick & Carey instructional design models. The ADDIE model has 5 stages - analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. It is flexible but can be time consuming. The Dick & Carey model has 10 more specific stages including identifying goals, analyzing instruction, developing materials, and conducting formative and summative evaluations. Both models focus on input, process, and output, but the Dick & Carey model is more agile and integrates evaluation throughout.
Addie Model vs Dick and Carey Model
The document compares the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. Both models include analysis, assessments, design, and evaluations. However, the ADDIE model has fewer steps (five total) than the Dick and Carey model (ten steps). Additionally, the ADDIE model is linear while the Dick and Carey model is iterative with evaluations occurring at each step. The key advantages and challenges of each model are also discussed.
Addie versus Dick and Carey
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. Both models are process oriented and goal oriented, focusing on learner needs and utilizing assessments. The main differences are that ADDIE has 5 linear steps with evaluation at the end, while Dick and Carey has 10 interactive steps with ongoing evaluation. ADDIE is more flexible across industries, while Dick and Carey is best for educational settings. Each model offers advantages like structured approaches, but also challenges like time consumption.
ADDIE & Dick Carey Model Presentation.pptx
This document compares and contrasts the ADDIE model and Dick and Carey instructional design models. The ADDIE model is a 5-step process used to plan effective learning experiences, while the Dick and Carey model has 10 steps and is more commonly used for educational platforms. Both models take a systematic approach and include analysis and evaluation stages. The ADDIE model is more linear while Dick and Carey is more iterative. The ADDIE model is more commonly used but less flexible, while Dick and Carey is more detailed but requires more time.
Compare and contrast addie and dick and carey model
This document compares and contrasts the ADDIE model and Dick & Carey model for instructional design. The ADDIE model consists of 5 phases - analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The Dick & Carey model has 10 phases and promotes a systems view of instruction. Both models focus on input, output, and the process of designing curriculum. The key differences are that ADDIE has 5 phases and is more flexible, while Dick & Carey has 10 detailed and straightforward phases and includes formative and summative evaluations.
William Eckert ADDIE vs Dick and Carey Model
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. The ADDIE model consists of 5 sequential phases: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. It is flexible but does not consider learner characteristics. The Dick and Carey model has 10 interconnected phases including identifying goals and developing performance objectives. It allows for continuous assessment but is more time-consuming to implement than ADDIE. Both models provide a systematic approach to instructional design but have different strengths and weaknesses.
Addie model
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model, which are two instructional design models. The ADDIE model consists of 5 sequential phases - analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The Dick and Carey model promotes a systems view of instruction and has 10 phases including identifying goals, analyzing learners/contexts, developing objectives, and conducting formative and summative evaluations. Both models focus on input, output, and an iterative process. A key difference is the Dick and Carey model has more detailed phases and two stages of evaluation.
Addie vs Dick and Carey Model
ADDIE vs Dick and Carey Model.
A description of the models, their similarities and and differences.
AddIe vs Dick and Carey Model.pptx
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model includes five sequential phases of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. In contrast, the Dick and Carey model consists of 10 iterative steps and is used more for developing school curriculums. While both aim to effectively design educational experiences, the ADDIE model takes a more linear approach while the Dick and Carey model is more iterative in nature.
Instructional Design Models.pptx
The document discusses two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey Systems Approach model. Both models provide frameworks for organizing instruction, but they differ in their structure and approach. The ADDIE model is a traditional, linear 5-phase approach, while the Dick and Carey model takes a more iterative, systems-based 10-step approach. While each has advantages like flexibility or a systematic process, they also have challenges such as lack of flexibility or complexity that can deter users. Overall, these models provide important guidelines to help create effective teaching initiatives.
Comparison of addie & dick and carey id models
The document compares two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model is a traditional 5-phase approach developed for the US Army, while the Dick and Carey model uses a 10-step iterative process with evaluation built into each step. Both have a systems approach, but the ADDIE model is more linear and sequential while the Dick and Carey model is more flexible and iterative.
Addie vs dick and carey
This document compares the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. Both models are instructional design systems that generate a desired outcome, but they differ in the number of steps and their evaluation processes. ADDIE has 5 steps and uses a summative evaluation at the final step, while Dick and Carey has 10 steps and incorporates evaluation throughout the process. One advantage of Dick and Carey is that it allows for multiple evaluations and corrections during development, while an advantage of ADDIE is that it is widely used and forms the basis of other models. However, Dick and Carey requires going through all steps in order, while ADDIE can be detailed and time-consuming to implement.
Similar to Addie vs Dick & Carey Models (20)
Compare & Contrast ADDIE and Dick and Carey Models
Compare & Contrast ADDIE and Dick and Carey Models
Compare and contrast addie and dick and carey model
Compare and contrast addie and dick and carey model
Recently uploaded
加急制作美国密歇根州立大学毕业证（msu毕业证书）本科文凭原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【美国密歇根州立大学毕业证（msu毕业证书）本科文凭】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
学校原版(curtin毕业证书)澳洲科廷科技大学毕业证双学位证书原版一模一样
原版定制【微信:bwp0011】《(curtin毕业证书)澳洲科廷科技大学毕业证双学位证书》【微信:bwp0011】成绩单 、雅思、外壳、留信学历认证永久存档查询，采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信bwp0011】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信bwp0011】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
原版制作英属哥伦比亚大学毕业证研究生文凭证书原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【英属哥伦比亚大学毕业证研究生文凭证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
哪里购买伯明翰大学毕业证（uob毕业证）学位证书原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【伯明翰大学毕业证（uob毕业证）学位证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
高仿迈阿密大学毕业证（um毕业证）硕士文凭证书原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【迈阿密大学毕业证（um毕业证）硕士文凭证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Webinar - How to Craft a Winning Compensation Strategy
Join Payscale’s HR team as they discuss how to rethink and build a better compensation strategy that works for your organization.
The Rules Do Apply: Navigating HR Compliance
https://www.humanresourcestoday.com/frs/26903483/the-rules-do-apply--navigating-hr-compliance
HR Compliance is like a giant game of whack-a-mole. Once you think your company is compliant with all policies and procedures documented and in place, there’s a new or amended law, regulation, or final rule that pops up landing you back at ‘start.’ There are shifts, interpretations, and balancing acts to understanding compliance changes. Keeping up is not easy and it’s very time consuming.
This is a particular pain point for small HR departments, or HR departments of 1, that lack compliance teams and in-house labor attorneys. So, what do you do?
The goal of this webinar is to make you smarter in knowing what you should be focused on and the questions you should be asking. It will also provide you with resources for making compliance more manageable.
Objectives:
• Understand the regulatory landscape, including labor laws at the local, state, and federal levels
• Best practices for developing, implementing, and maintaining effective compliance programs
• Resources and strategies for staying informed about changes to labor laws, regulations, and compliance requirements
Why you need to recognize your employees? (15 reasons + tips)
Discover the top reasons for employee recognition. Learn practical tips for creating an effective recognition program that benefits employees, managers, and the entire organization.
How to write job description to attract talents
JD must blend with job responsibilities, work culture, benefits, and work mode
Recently uploaded (10)
Webinar - How to Craft a Winning Compensation Strategy
Webinar - How to Craft a Winning Compensation Strategy
Why you need to recognize your employees? (15 reasons + tips)
Why you need to recognize your employees? (15 reasons + tips)
Addie vs Dick & Carey Models
- 1. ADDIE VS DICK & CAREY INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN MODELS SAMANTHA L. ROLLE HRD647-INTRODUCTION TO INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN (ID) BARRY UNIVERSITY
- 2. OBJECTIVES • Describe the ADDIE and Dick & Carey ID models • Compare and contrast the ADDIE and Dick & Carey ID models • Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the ADDIE and Dick & Carey ID models
- 3. THE ADDIE MODEL A five phased approach based on an earlier ID model has a hierarchical structure with each phase to be completed in a linear fashion. The ADDIE model is interactive and dynamic.
- 4. DICK & CAREY MODEL The Dick & Carey ID Model is a ten step system. The Dick & Carey Model is also known as the “Systems Approach Model”.
- 5. WHAT IS SIMILAR BETWEEN BOTH MODELS? A systemic approach Components of analysis, design and evaluation Focused on the learning perspective
- 6. WHAT IS DIFFERENT BETWEEN BOTH MODELS? ADDIE • 5 linear steps involved in this model • Steps of model should be followed in sequential order • Evaluation is at the final step DICK & CAREY • 10 systematic steps involved in this model • Model is iterative • Evaluation is throughout all steps
- 7. WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES OF BOTH MODELS? ADDIE • Most ID models are variations of ADDIE • A simple 5 step approach that is easy to follow • Model is interactive and dynamic DICK & CAREY • Focused on crafting learning plans • Formative evaluation incorporated at each step which enables immediate adjustments to the learning event if needed
- 8. WHAT ARE THE DISADVANTAGES OF BOTH MODELS? ADDIE • Evaluation phase only performed at the conclusion of the model which does not allow for adjustments earlier in the process DICK & CAREY • Too many steps involved in the approach whereas some steps do not directly influence the learning outcome • Learning objectives are defined before analysis is complete
- 9. CONCLUSION ADDIE and Dick & Carey are two of other ID models with distinct differences, however they have the same desired outcome which is to build effective learning events.