ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE
THROUGH IMPROVED
ECOSYSTEM AND FACULTY
ENGAGEMENT
THANIKACHALAM VEDHATHIRI
VTHANI2025@YAHOO.IN
EXCELLENCE
•The Quality of Outstanding or Extremely
Good.
•Institutes offer Distinctive Programs
•Develops Brilliant Graduates
•Employs Eminent Faculty
•Offers Superior Solutions
ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE
•Academic Excellence is Essential in Developing a
Nation’s Competitiveness in the Fast-Growing
Knowledge Economy.
•Engineering Universities play key roles in Creating
and Institutionalizing Knowledge and Human
Capitals, Sustaining them through Continuous
Research and Undertaking Sponsored Research
Works from Industry and Government.
TIER ONE INSTITUTES
ESTABLISHED BY THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
SELECT THE OUTSTANDING FACULTY
PLAN EXCELLENT GRADUATE AND
POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMS
OFFER SUPERIOR SOLUTIONS TO THE CLIENTS
TIER II INSTITUTIONS
•National Institutes
•Funded by Central Government
•Autonomous
•Universities
•Offer Bachelor, Master and Doctoral Programs
•Provide very Good Solutions to the Clients
TIER III INSTITUTES
•State Government Institutes
•State Aided Institutes (90% funds from the State
Government)
•Can get Research Grants
TIER IV INSTITUTES
• Self-Financing Institutes
• Affiliated to State Technical Universities
• Administrative and Financial Autonomy
• Some are offering Masters and Doctoral Programs
• Enjoys Academic Autonomy also
• Can get funds for Research and Development Projects
from DST, TIFAC, DRDO
WORLD CLASS ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITIES
• Developing a Nation’s Competitiveness in the Global
Knowledge Economy
• Create and Disseminate Knowledge
• Educate a Highly Competent Workforce for
Technological and Intellectual Leadership
• Serve not only the Needs of the Country but also
Needs of the World
GLOBAL
APPROACHE
S TO
EXCELLENCE
China’s “985 Project”
Germany’s “Centers of Excellence”
Korea’s “Brain Korea 21”
Russian Federation’s “National Research University”
Saudi Arabia’s “Education City Projects”
ATTRIBUTES FOR RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES
(ALTBACH, 2011)
Highly qualified
faculty
Talented students
Excellence in
research
Quality of teaching
with international
standards
High levels of
government and
private funding
Academic freedom
Autonomous
governing
structure
Well-equipped
facilities
SALMI’S
(2009)
COMPLEM
-ENTARY
FACTORS
A
Concentration
of Talents
Abundant
Resources
Favorable and
Autonomous
Governance
SALMI’S
PRESCRIPTI
ON FOR
TECHNICAL
UNIVERSITIE
S
Should
offer a Rich
Learning
and
Research
Environmen
t
Should
provide
Favorable and
Autonomous
Governance
Encourag
e
Strategic
Vision
and
Innovatio
n
INSTITUTE BASED MANAGEMENT (IBM)
(PRISCILLA.W & ALBERS MOHRMAN, 1992)
DECENTRALIZE
• Power to Make Decisions that Influence Institutional
Practices, and Directions
• Competencies that Enable Faculty to Understand and
Contribute to Institutional Performance including
Technical Knowledge to Do the Job or Provide
Services, Interpersonal Skills, Managing Knowledge
and Expertise
INSTITUTE BASED MANAGEMENT…
(PERISCILLA & ALBERS, 1993)
• Information about the Performance of the Institution
including Revenues, Expenditure, Department
Performance, and Strategic Information on the Broader
Policy and Economic Environment, and
• Rewards that are Based on the Performance of the
Institution and the Contributions of the Faculty
FACULTY ENGAGEMENT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
(PAUL D U & MATTHEW , GARY RHOACHES, RACHEL C P AND STEVENS)
• High Levels of Engagement at the Institute
• Faculty Members use Active and Collaborative
Learning
• Engage Students in Experiences
• Emphasize Higher Order Activities in the Class Room
• Interact with the Students Academically
• Value Enriching Educational Experiences
• Conduct Faculty Workshops, Teaching Circles
TRAIN THE NOVICE
• Depute the Novice to the Planned Faculty Development
Programs of AICTE, Academic Staff Colleges, ISTE,
NITTTRs, In-house workshops
• Suggest them to undergo MOOCs of Coursera. edX,
and World Bank Institute.
SEQUENTIAL SUMMER SCHOOLS LEADING
TO MASTER DEGREES IN ENGINEERING
•Reintroduce Sequential Summer Schools
leading to Masters Degrees in Engineering
Education in IITs, NITs, NITTTRs and State
Technical Universities
•All the Four NITTTRs can Plan MOOCs
•All the Extension Centers of NITTTRs can offer
National Faculty Development Programs
PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
THROUGH
MENTORS
Develop Mentors through NITTTRs
Develop
Develop Mentoring Programs
Develop
Organize Pilot Study
Organize
Improve Mentoring Process
Improve
Get the feedback from the
Mentees
Get
Standardize the Mentoring Process
Standardize
GENERATE CASE STUDIES
Collect information
from the Ongoing
National Projects
Organize Cases on
the Success Stories
and Failures
Prepare Draft
Cases
Administer to the
Faculty
Get the Feedbacks
Revise and
Improve
PART-TIME INTERNAL RESEARCH WORKS
Register the Candidates as Part-Time Internal or
External Researchers for PhD Program under the
Approved Guides in the Autonomous Colleges,
NITs, State Technical Universities, and NITTTRs
Register
Provide more Number of Fellowships for PhD Programs AICTE
Provide
Engage Emeritus/Adjunct/Visiting Faculty Members to Supplement and
Complement
Engage
WEBINARS/PODCASTS/VIDEO
CONFERENCES
Plan
Webinars/Podcasts/Video
Conferences as National
Initiatives for Faculty
Development
1
Supplement the Research
Works on Research
Methodology
2
Develop CDS for their use
3
PLAN FLEXIBLE PROGRAMS
Plan Flexible
Duration Masters
and Doctoral
Programs
1
Plan
Interdisciplinary
Research Programs
(MS)
2
Recognize the
Programs for
Recruitment and
Promotion
3
QUALITY CIRCLES
• 30 Participants in HRD from overseas countries under SCAAP,
ITEC, TCS schemes of Government of India
• 11 M. Tech (HRD) participants
• 3 PhD Research Scholars
• 20 Short-Term Faculty Participants
• Quality Circles were constituted; Maximum 8 per Circle;
duration of the exercise : 45 minutes; Case Studies were
Distributed
SUGGESTIONS OF THE QUALITY CIRCLES
Strategic Planning
Establishing an
Industry-Institute-
Government
Partnership
Establishing a Local
Forum
Developing MOUs
with the Companies
Networking with
International
Universities
Planning Quiz
Competitions
SUGGESTION
S FROM THE
QUALITY
CIRCLES…
Establishing a Counselling
Center
Establishing
Planning Open House
Planning
Planning a Product
Development Center
Planning
Planning Local Centers of
Professional Associations
Planning
Planning Consortium of the
Engineering Colleges
Planning
Planning Interdisciplinary
Engineering Education and
Research Programs
Planning
SUGGESTION
S FROM
QUALITY
CIRCLES…
Planning Dual Programs
Planning
Planning Service Centers for
SMES
Planning
Planning the Production
Centers
Planning
Planning Entrepreneurship
Development Programs
Planning
Planning Instructional
Materials Development and
Production Centers
Planning
Planning and Developing
MMLPs
Planning
and
Developing
ACADEMIC ECOSYSTEM
• Academic Council
• Curriculum Development Center
• Instructional Materials Development Center
• Research and Development Center
• In-House Faculty Development Center
• Students Service Center
• Grievance and Redressal Unit
• Industry-Institute-Government Partnership-Center
INTEGRATED ACTIVITIES
• Review the achievements once in a quarter
• Conduct Academic Audit
• Plan Appreciative Inquiries
• Resolve the Bottlenecks and Obstructions
• Publish the Annual Reports
• Reward the achievers and the Units/ Departments/Centers.
ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE
• It is due to properly preparing a Strategic Plan coupled
with the well designed Academic Ecosystem. The
function of the Units/Centers could be facilitated
through engaging the faculty.
• Success of Strategic Planning can be ensured through
commitment for Academic Ecosystem and Engaging
the Faculty
THANK YOU
•Your Questions Please.

Academic excellence through improved ecosystem and faculty engagement (4)

  • 1.
    ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE THROUGH IMPROVED ECOSYSTEMAND FACULTY ENGAGEMENT THANIKACHALAM VEDHATHIRI VTHANI2025@YAHOO.IN
  • 2.
    EXCELLENCE •The Quality ofOutstanding or Extremely Good. •Institutes offer Distinctive Programs •Develops Brilliant Graduates •Employs Eminent Faculty •Offers Superior Solutions
  • 3.
    ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE •Academic Excellenceis Essential in Developing a Nation’s Competitiveness in the Fast-Growing Knowledge Economy. •Engineering Universities play key roles in Creating and Institutionalizing Knowledge and Human Capitals, Sustaining them through Continuous Research and Undertaking Sponsored Research Works from Industry and Government.
  • 4.
    TIER ONE INSTITUTES ESTABLISHEDBY THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT SELECT THE OUTSTANDING FACULTY PLAN EXCELLENT GRADUATE AND POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMS OFFER SUPERIOR SOLUTIONS TO THE CLIENTS
  • 5.
    TIER II INSTITUTIONS •NationalInstitutes •Funded by Central Government •Autonomous •Universities •Offer Bachelor, Master and Doctoral Programs •Provide very Good Solutions to the Clients
  • 6.
    TIER III INSTITUTES •StateGovernment Institutes •State Aided Institutes (90% funds from the State Government) •Can get Research Grants
  • 7.
    TIER IV INSTITUTES •Self-Financing Institutes • Affiliated to State Technical Universities • Administrative and Financial Autonomy • Some are offering Masters and Doctoral Programs • Enjoys Academic Autonomy also • Can get funds for Research and Development Projects from DST, TIFAC, DRDO
  • 8.
    WORLD CLASS ENGINEERING UNIVERSITIES •Developing a Nation’s Competitiveness in the Global Knowledge Economy • Create and Disseminate Knowledge • Educate a Highly Competent Workforce for Technological and Intellectual Leadership • Serve not only the Needs of the Country but also Needs of the World
  • 9.
    GLOBAL APPROACHE S TO EXCELLENCE China’s “985Project” Germany’s “Centers of Excellence” Korea’s “Brain Korea 21” Russian Federation’s “National Research University” Saudi Arabia’s “Education City Projects”
  • 10.
    ATTRIBUTES FOR RESEARCHUNIVERSITIES (ALTBACH, 2011) Highly qualified faculty Talented students Excellence in research Quality of teaching with international standards High levels of government and private funding Academic freedom Autonomous governing structure Well-equipped facilities
  • 11.
  • 12.
    SALMI’S PRESCRIPTI ON FOR TECHNICAL UNIVERSITIE S Should offer aRich Learning and Research Environmen t Should provide Favorable and Autonomous Governance Encourag e Strategic Vision and Innovatio n
  • 13.
    INSTITUTE BASED MANAGEMENT(IBM) (PRISCILLA.W & ALBERS MOHRMAN, 1992) DECENTRALIZE • Power to Make Decisions that Influence Institutional Practices, and Directions • Competencies that Enable Faculty to Understand and Contribute to Institutional Performance including Technical Knowledge to Do the Job or Provide Services, Interpersonal Skills, Managing Knowledge and Expertise
  • 14.
    INSTITUTE BASED MANAGEMENT… (PERISCILLA& ALBERS, 1993) • Information about the Performance of the Institution including Revenues, Expenditure, Department Performance, and Strategic Information on the Broader Policy and Economic Environment, and • Rewards that are Based on the Performance of the Institution and the Contributions of the Faculty
  • 15.
    FACULTY ENGAGEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT (PAULD U & MATTHEW , GARY RHOACHES, RACHEL C P AND STEVENS) • High Levels of Engagement at the Institute • Faculty Members use Active and Collaborative Learning • Engage Students in Experiences • Emphasize Higher Order Activities in the Class Room • Interact with the Students Academically • Value Enriching Educational Experiences • Conduct Faculty Workshops, Teaching Circles
  • 16.
    TRAIN THE NOVICE •Depute the Novice to the Planned Faculty Development Programs of AICTE, Academic Staff Colleges, ISTE, NITTTRs, In-house workshops • Suggest them to undergo MOOCs of Coursera. edX, and World Bank Institute.
  • 17.
    SEQUENTIAL SUMMER SCHOOLSLEADING TO MASTER DEGREES IN ENGINEERING •Reintroduce Sequential Summer Schools leading to Masters Degrees in Engineering Education in IITs, NITs, NITTTRs and State Technical Universities •All the Four NITTTRs can Plan MOOCs •All the Extension Centers of NITTTRs can offer National Faculty Development Programs
  • 18.
    PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH MENTORS Develop Mentors throughNITTTRs Develop Develop Mentoring Programs Develop Organize Pilot Study Organize Improve Mentoring Process Improve Get the feedback from the Mentees Get Standardize the Mentoring Process Standardize
  • 19.
    GENERATE CASE STUDIES Collectinformation from the Ongoing National Projects Organize Cases on the Success Stories and Failures Prepare Draft Cases Administer to the Faculty Get the Feedbacks Revise and Improve
  • 20.
    PART-TIME INTERNAL RESEARCHWORKS Register the Candidates as Part-Time Internal or External Researchers for PhD Program under the Approved Guides in the Autonomous Colleges, NITs, State Technical Universities, and NITTTRs Register Provide more Number of Fellowships for PhD Programs AICTE Provide Engage Emeritus/Adjunct/Visiting Faculty Members to Supplement and Complement Engage
  • 21.
    WEBINARS/PODCASTS/VIDEO CONFERENCES Plan Webinars/Podcasts/Video Conferences as National Initiativesfor Faculty Development 1 Supplement the Research Works on Research Methodology 2 Develop CDS for their use 3
  • 22.
    PLAN FLEXIBLE PROGRAMS PlanFlexible Duration Masters and Doctoral Programs 1 Plan Interdisciplinary Research Programs (MS) 2 Recognize the Programs for Recruitment and Promotion 3
  • 23.
    QUALITY CIRCLES • 30Participants in HRD from overseas countries under SCAAP, ITEC, TCS schemes of Government of India • 11 M. Tech (HRD) participants • 3 PhD Research Scholars • 20 Short-Term Faculty Participants • Quality Circles were constituted; Maximum 8 per Circle; duration of the exercise : 45 minutes; Case Studies were Distributed
  • 24.
    SUGGESTIONS OF THEQUALITY CIRCLES Strategic Planning Establishing an Industry-Institute- Government Partnership Establishing a Local Forum Developing MOUs with the Companies Networking with International Universities Planning Quiz Competitions
  • 25.
    SUGGESTION S FROM THE QUALITY CIRCLES… Establishinga Counselling Center Establishing Planning Open House Planning Planning a Product Development Center Planning Planning Local Centers of Professional Associations Planning Planning Consortium of the Engineering Colleges Planning Planning Interdisciplinary Engineering Education and Research Programs Planning
  • 26.
    SUGGESTION S FROM QUALITY CIRCLES… Planning DualPrograms Planning Planning Service Centers for SMES Planning Planning the Production Centers Planning Planning Entrepreneurship Development Programs Planning Planning Instructional Materials Development and Production Centers Planning Planning and Developing MMLPs Planning and Developing
  • 27.
    ACADEMIC ECOSYSTEM • AcademicCouncil • Curriculum Development Center • Instructional Materials Development Center • Research and Development Center • In-House Faculty Development Center • Students Service Center • Grievance and Redressal Unit • Industry-Institute-Government Partnership-Center
  • 28.
    INTEGRATED ACTIVITIES • Reviewthe achievements once in a quarter • Conduct Academic Audit • Plan Appreciative Inquiries • Resolve the Bottlenecks and Obstructions • Publish the Annual Reports • Reward the achievers and the Units/ Departments/Centers.
  • 29.
    ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE • Itis due to properly preparing a Strategic Plan coupled with the well designed Academic Ecosystem. The function of the Units/Centers could be facilitated through engaging the faculty. • Success of Strategic Planning can be ensured through commitment for Academic Ecosystem and Engaging the Faculty
  • 30.