SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Wind Load Analysis on Buildings and Structures
Course Title-Finite Element Analysis
Course No- CE G619
Instructor In Charge- Dr. PN Rao
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani
Hyderabad Campus
Civil Engineering Department
Prepared by :
Jhaveri Ronak Kirtikumar-2018H1430036H
Wind Load Analysis as per American Code 2002
Upcoming Project Work
References
CONTENTS
Wind Load Analysis as per IS 875:1987 (Part 3)
Comparison of Wind Load Analysis with IS 875:2009
Introduction and Background
OBJECTIVES
• To Study the Basics of Wind Loads and it’s Variation with
Height.
• To Gain Design Knowledge on various structural elements like
Beam,Column,Slab,Foundation etc.
• To find the wind pressure by considering individual structural
components and structure as a whole by IS Codes and compare
it with American Codes
• To Analyze and Design various Structures such as Multistorey
Buildings, Bridges, Tunnels, Chimneys etc.
• Analyze and Design Wind Load by ETABS.
Variation of Wind Velocity with Height
• Variation of Wind Velocity with
Height Near the earth’s surface
where the motion is Opposed
and the wind speed is reduced
by the surface friction.
• At the surface , the wind speed
reduces to zero and then begins
to increase with height and at
some height known as the
gradient height, the motion may
be considered to be free of the
earth’s frictional influence and
will attain its ‘gradient velocity’.
• Gradient Height is considered
as 300 m for flat ground& 550 m
for very rough terrain
Wind Load Analysis of Buildings
and Other Structures as per IS
875:1987 Part 3 and IS 875:2009
Obtain Base Wind Speed at Location
Calculation of Design Wind Speed
Calculation of Wind Pressure
Calculation of Design Wind Pressure
Wind Forces on Individual Structures
Calculate Wind Forces on Structures and Plot it.
Steps to Calculate Wind Force Acting on
Structure
Calculation of Design Wind Speed
• Design wind speed is Mathematically expressed as
Vz = Vb . K1 . K2 . K3
• Design Wind Speed depends on -
1) Risk Level
2) Terrain Roughness, Height and Size of Structure
3) Local Topography
Here,
Vz = Design Wind Speed at any Height in m/s
Vb = Basic wind speed (Appendix A-Clause5.2)
k1 = Probability Factor (Risk Coefficient) (clause 5.3.1)
k2 = Terrain Height & Structure Size Factor (clause 5.3.2)
k3 = Topography factor (clause 5.3.3)
Basic Wind Speed (Vb)
• Basic wind speed Vb depends
on the location of the building.
• For this purpose, The country
is divided into various zones
with specified wind speeds
ranging from 33m/s to 55 m/s.
• Basic wind speed is based on
gust velocity averaged over a
short time interval of 3
seconds at 10m height from
mean ground level in an open
terrain and for 50 years return
period.
Risk Coefficient (K1)
• The Risk Coefficient K1 takes into
account the degree of reliability
required and the expected life of
structure. The Design Life for
various Buildings are as follows:
1. All general buildings (50 years)
2. Temporary sheds (5 years)
3. Less important Buildings ( 25 yrs)
4. Important Buildings ( 100 years)
Terrain Height & Structure Size Factor (K2)
• It depends upon Terrain Category and Building Class/Size
of Structure. Four Terrain Categories are specified by the
code depending on the availability of obstruction to the
flow of wind.
• Category 1: Refers to No Obstructions available to the
Building e.g.- Sea Coasts and Flat Treeless Plains where
other Structures if any are having Height less than 1.5m.
• Category 2: Refers to Open Terrain with Scattered
Obstructions of 1.5m to 10m Height. e.g- Industrial area.
• Category 3: Refers to areas of Closely Spaced Buildings
of height up to 10m e.g- Buildings at Outskirts of City
• Category 4: Refers to area with Highly Closed Buildings
of large Heights e.g- dense city area.
Terrain Height & Structure Size Factor (K2)
•K2 factor also depends on the
Dimensions of the Building
under considerations.
•Based on Dimension of
Building, the Structures are
classified as:
1) Class A: Maximum of l, b,
h<20m.
2) Class B: Maximum of l, b, h in
between 20m to 50m.
3) Class C : Maximum of l, b, h >
50m.
Topography Factor (K3)
• It Depends on the Topography i.e Hill Region, Cliffs and
Ridges.
• If the Upward Ground Slope θ≤3◦, Value of K3 shall be taken
as 1.0
• For θ>3◦ , The Value of K3 lies between 1.0 to 1.36. It can be
determined by-
K3 =1 + Cs
• Shape factor varies considerably with proportion of structure
& horizontal angle of incidence of the wind and it can be
determined by using Appendix C as given in IS 875:1987 –
part3
Calculation of Design Wind Pressure
• Wind Pressure due to Design Velocity can be determined by the following
formula as given in IS 875:1987 part3
Pz=0.6 (𝑉z)2
Here,
𝑃z = Wind Pressure in N/m2 at Height z.
𝑉z = Design Wind Velocity in m/s at Height z.
• As Per IS 875:2009 - Part 3 ,Few New Factors like Wind Directionality Factor, Area
Averaging Factor, Combination Factor are introduced to make Design Economical,
Hence Design Pressure is different from wind pressure which is given by following
formula :-
Pd = Kd . Ka . Kc . Pz
Here ,
Pd = Design Wind Pressure in N/m2 at Height z.
Pz = Wind Pressure in N/m2 at Height z.
Kd = Wind Directionality Factor.
Ka = Area Averaging Factor.
Kc = Combination Factor.
Wind Force on Individual Member
• The Wind Load on individual structural elements such as
roofs and walls, individual cladding units and their fittings,
it is essential to take account of the pressure difference
between opposite faces of such elements or units.
• For calculation of wind force on individual cladding units
following formula can be used:-
F=(Cpe−Cpi) A Pd
Here,
Pd = design wind pressure in N/m2 at height z.
Cpe = external pressure coefficient.
Cpi = internal pressure coefficient.
A = Surface area of structural element
• Internal and External pressure coefficients for different
units having different shapes, structures and slopes are
described in IS 875 with figures.
Wind Forces on Structures
• The value of Force Coefficients
apply to a building or structure as a
whole, and when multiplied by the
effective frontal area A of the
building or structure and by design
wind pressure, Pd gives the Total
Wind Load on that particular
building or structure.
• It’s expression is given by
F=(Cf ) A Pd
Here,
Pd =Design wind pressure at
height z.
Cf = Force coefficient of building.
A = Surface area of structural
element.
Wind Load Distribution
Wind Load Analysis of Buildings
and Other Structures as per ASCE-7
American Code (2002)
Wind Loads According to ASCE 7
Wind Loads According to ASCE 7
• Wind loads are randomly applied
Dynamic loads.
• It depends on the wind speed, shape,
height and topographic location of the
structure.
• The more the air is streamed, the less
the reaction force exerted by the
structure.
• Wind force highly depends on the shape
of the structure.
Wind Loads According to ASCE 7
Wind Speed Curve in Different Region
Sea Side
Terrain Exposure
Open Area Built Up Area Big City
Wind Loads According to ASCE 7
Surface Roughness and Exposure
Surface
Roughness and
Exposure
Definitions Examples
B Urban and suburban areas,
wooded areas or other terrain
with numerous closely spaced
obstructions having the size of
single-family dwellings or larger.
C Open terrain with scattered
obstructions having heights generally
less than 30 ft (9.1 m). This category
includes flat open country, grasslands,
and all water surfaces in hurricane
prone regions.
D Flat, unobstructed areas and water
surfaces outside hurricane prone
regions. This category includes
smooth mud flats, salt flats, and
unbroken ice.
Wind Loads According to ASCE 7
Basic Wind Speed (V)
• Basic wind speed (V) based
on 3-second gusts, 33 ft (10
m) above ground in a Ground
Roughness Exposure C
(defined in m/s).
• Some regions such as:
Taiwan, coastal China,
coastal USA and Japan have
very high wind speed and
others such as: Indonesia,
India and inland USA have
lower wind speed
Wind Loads According to ASCE 7
Wind Directionality Factor (Kd)
• Wind Directionality Factor,
Kd shall be determined from
Table 6-4 of ASCE.
• This factor means to
accommodate the
cross-sectional shape of the
structure
Wind Loads According to ASCE 7
Importance Factor, I
• An importance factor (I) for the
building or other structure shall
be determined from Table 6-1
based on building and structure
categories listed in Table 1-1.
• This factor to accommodate the
importance of the structure.
Wind Loads According to ASCE 7
Velocity Pressure Coefficient (Kz)
• Velocity Pressure Coefficient (Kz)
depends on the site relative height
to the ground z.
•This means for roof top structure,
z would be the total height of the
component and the building its
installed.
•This factor is to accommodate the
absolute height of the structure
from ground level.
Topographic Factor (Kzt), Force
Coefficient (Cf )
• Local abrupt topography affects wind near the ground.
• Wind speed depends on shape of hill, location of building and height above ground.
• The value of Kzt was taken as 1 with assumption of flat region environment.
• This factor is to accommodate the topographic area of the structure location
• Force coefficient, Cf determined based on the shape of the structure is to
accommodate the wind-facing area of the structure.
Velocity Pressure (qz)
• From Bernoulli’s equation of flow, the wind pressure can be
calculated as:
(q in psf, V in mph)
• The velocity pressure qz evaluated at height z shall be
calculated by:
Wind Loads According to ASCE 7
• Design wind force for each component shall be determined by:
• Gust effect factor, G, could be calculated by
Comparison of wind Load Analysis of
Buildings and Other structures by Indian
Standard Codes and American Standard
Codes
Conclusion by Comparing with IS and ASCE
Codes for Wind Load Analysis
• ASCE:07 allows to use basic wind data by studying and
analysing wind data which means more accurate local
conditions can be considered and hence structure may be
more economical as well as more strong. Local weather data
study and its analysis should be allowed in Indian Codes too.
• Wind Load for structure is calculated for 2 time taking only 1
case using IS 875: part3 while it is calculated for 12 times
considering 4 different cases in case of ASCE-07:2002.
• Base reactions as well as Shear forces in Y directions are zero
as per IS 875 but it have positive value in case of ASCE-07.
• Moments for both codes are almost equal.
• Joint displacements are more in case of IS codes compared to
that displacements calculated as per ASCE: 07
Conclusion by Comparing with IS and ASCE
Codes for Wind Load Analysis
• Gust Factor method in IS 875 which is somewhat similar to
analysis method in ASCE-07:2002 is yet to be developed fully
as compared to ASCE code.
• ASCE-07 consider 4 cases while IS875 consider only two cases
to determine design wind pressure. Indian code should
improve for determining wind load taking more cases, as
more cases mean more precision and hence less risk.
• American code is more effective for designing for wind loads
as it gives less deformation as compared to Indian code. Less
deformation means less chance for failure.
REFERENCES
1) Council of Tall Buildings and Habitat Website (CTBUH).
2) Indian Standard Code- Code of Practice for all Design
Loads (Other than Earthquake resisting system) for
Buildings and Structures- IS:875: 1987: Part 3 Wind
Loads.
3) Indian Standard Code Draft Version- IS 875:2009-Part 3 :-
Draft version with commentary.
4) American Code: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and
Other Structures (ASCE-7:2002 Version).
5) National Programme Technology Enhanced Learning-
(NPTEL) Design of Reinforced Structures Part 1 and Part
2.
33

More Related Content

Similar to 391239247-FEM-PPT.ppt

Performance of High-Rise Steel Building With and Without Bracings
Performance of High-Rise Steel Building With and Without BracingsPerformance of High-Rise Steel Building With and Without Bracings
Performance of High-Rise Steel Building With and Without Bracings
IJERA Editor
 
structutal design wind load on structure
structutal design wind load on structurestructutal design wind load on structure
structutal design wind load on structure
tekalign24
 
variation of wind load with height & aspect ratio
variation of wind load with height & aspect ratiovariation of wind load with height & aspect ratio
variation of wind load with height & aspect ratio
SUDIP KUMAR HOR
 
windload 22.pptx
windload 22.pptxwindload 22.pptx
windload 22.pptx
YimerMeshesha2
 
Wind analysis of building
Wind analysis of buildingWind analysis of building
Wind analysis of building
hassaanbasha
 
383475603-Presentation-on-Wind-Load.pptx
383475603-Presentation-on-Wind-Load.pptx383475603-Presentation-on-Wind-Load.pptx
383475603-Presentation-on-Wind-Load.pptx
AshokPanda19
 
Design wind load
Design wind loadDesign wind load
Design wind load
Sharda University
 
Effect of wind Load On High Rise Building
Effect of wind Load On High Rise BuildingEffect of wind Load On High Rise Building
Effect of wind Load On High Rise Building
Vikas Patre
 
Wind loading
Wind loadingWind loading
Wind loading
Deepak Kumar
 
Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...
Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...
Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...
IRJET Journal
 
Effects of shape on the wind instigate response of high rise buildings
Effects of shape on the wind instigate response of high rise buildingsEffects of shape on the wind instigate response of high rise buildings
Effects of shape on the wind instigate response of high rise buildings
eSAT Journals
 
Study on Effect of Wind Load and Earthquake Load on Multi-storey RC Framed Bu...
Study on Effect of Wind Load and Earthquake Load on Multi-storey RC Framed Bu...Study on Effect of Wind Load and Earthquake Load on Multi-storey RC Framed Bu...
Study on Effect of Wind Load and Earthquake Load on Multi-storey RC Framed Bu...
IJSRD
 
Group 2 , ce471
Group 2  ,  ce471Group 2  ,  ce471
Group 2 , ce471
ktx500
 
IRJET- Codal Comparison of IS-875 (Part 3) 1987 and IS-875 (Part 3) 2015 for ...
IRJET- Codal Comparison of IS-875 (Part 3) 1987 and IS-875 (Part 3) 2015 for ...IRJET- Codal Comparison of IS-875 (Part 3) 1987 and IS-875 (Part 3) 2015 for ...
IRJET- Codal Comparison of IS-875 (Part 3) 1987 and IS-875 (Part 3) 2015 for ...
IRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Wind Load Analysis for Different Configuration of Structures
IRJET- Wind Load Analysis for Different Configuration of StructuresIRJET- Wind Load Analysis for Different Configuration of Structures
IRJET- Wind Load Analysis for Different Configuration of Structures
IRJET Journal
 
Analysis and connection designs of precast load bearing wall
Analysis and connection designs of precast load bearing wallAnalysis and connection designs of precast load bearing wall
Analysis and connection designs of precast load bearing wall
eSAT Publishing House
 
Computation of Loads on Buildings of Different Typologies
Computation of Loads on Buildings of Different Typologies Computation of Loads on Buildings of Different Typologies
Computation of Loads on Buildings of Different Typologies
Ajit Sabnis
 
Analysis of Wind Load Effects on R.C Structure Resting on Flat and Sloping Gr...
Analysis of Wind Load Effects on R.C Structure Resting on Flat and Sloping Gr...Analysis of Wind Load Effects on R.C Structure Resting on Flat and Sloping Gr...
Analysis of Wind Load Effects on R.C Structure Resting on Flat and Sloping Gr...
IRJET Journal
 
Study of Comparison Between Static and Dynamic Analysis Subjected to Wind and...
Study of Comparison Between Static and Dynamic Analysis Subjected to Wind and...Study of Comparison Between Static and Dynamic Analysis Subjected to Wind and...
Study of Comparison Between Static and Dynamic Analysis Subjected to Wind and...
IRJET Journal
 
Comparisons of Shallow Foundations in Different Soil Condition
Comparisons of Shallow Foundations in Different Soil ConditionComparisons of Shallow Foundations in Different Soil Condition
Comparisons of Shallow Foundations in Different Soil Condition
IJMERJOURNAL
 

Similar to 391239247-FEM-PPT.ppt (20)

Performance of High-Rise Steel Building With and Without Bracings
Performance of High-Rise Steel Building With and Without BracingsPerformance of High-Rise Steel Building With and Without Bracings
Performance of High-Rise Steel Building With and Without Bracings
 
structutal design wind load on structure
structutal design wind load on structurestructutal design wind load on structure
structutal design wind load on structure
 
variation of wind load with height & aspect ratio
variation of wind load with height & aspect ratiovariation of wind load with height & aspect ratio
variation of wind load with height & aspect ratio
 
windload 22.pptx
windload 22.pptxwindload 22.pptx
windload 22.pptx
 
Wind analysis of building
Wind analysis of buildingWind analysis of building
Wind analysis of building
 
383475603-Presentation-on-Wind-Load.pptx
383475603-Presentation-on-Wind-Load.pptx383475603-Presentation-on-Wind-Load.pptx
383475603-Presentation-on-Wind-Load.pptx
 
Design wind load
Design wind loadDesign wind load
Design wind load
 
Effect of wind Load On High Rise Building
Effect of wind Load On High Rise BuildingEffect of wind Load On High Rise Building
Effect of wind Load On High Rise Building
 
Wind loading
Wind loadingWind loading
Wind loading
 
Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...
Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...
Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...
 
Effects of shape on the wind instigate response of high rise buildings
Effects of shape on the wind instigate response of high rise buildingsEffects of shape on the wind instigate response of high rise buildings
Effects of shape on the wind instigate response of high rise buildings
 
Study on Effect of Wind Load and Earthquake Load on Multi-storey RC Framed Bu...
Study on Effect of Wind Load and Earthquake Load on Multi-storey RC Framed Bu...Study on Effect of Wind Load and Earthquake Load on Multi-storey RC Framed Bu...
Study on Effect of Wind Load and Earthquake Load on Multi-storey RC Framed Bu...
 
Group 2 , ce471
Group 2  ,  ce471Group 2  ,  ce471
Group 2 , ce471
 
IRJET- Codal Comparison of IS-875 (Part 3) 1987 and IS-875 (Part 3) 2015 for ...
IRJET- Codal Comparison of IS-875 (Part 3) 1987 and IS-875 (Part 3) 2015 for ...IRJET- Codal Comparison of IS-875 (Part 3) 1987 and IS-875 (Part 3) 2015 for ...
IRJET- Codal Comparison of IS-875 (Part 3) 1987 and IS-875 (Part 3) 2015 for ...
 
IRJET- Wind Load Analysis for Different Configuration of Structures
IRJET- Wind Load Analysis for Different Configuration of StructuresIRJET- Wind Load Analysis for Different Configuration of Structures
IRJET- Wind Load Analysis for Different Configuration of Structures
 
Analysis and connection designs of precast load bearing wall
Analysis and connection designs of precast load bearing wallAnalysis and connection designs of precast load bearing wall
Analysis and connection designs of precast load bearing wall
 
Computation of Loads on Buildings of Different Typologies
Computation of Loads on Buildings of Different Typologies Computation of Loads on Buildings of Different Typologies
Computation of Loads on Buildings of Different Typologies
 
Analysis of Wind Load Effects on R.C Structure Resting on Flat and Sloping Gr...
Analysis of Wind Load Effects on R.C Structure Resting on Flat and Sloping Gr...Analysis of Wind Load Effects on R.C Structure Resting on Flat and Sloping Gr...
Analysis of Wind Load Effects on R.C Structure Resting on Flat and Sloping Gr...
 
Study of Comparison Between Static and Dynamic Analysis Subjected to Wind and...
Study of Comparison Between Static and Dynamic Analysis Subjected to Wind and...Study of Comparison Between Static and Dynamic Analysis Subjected to Wind and...
Study of Comparison Between Static and Dynamic Analysis Subjected to Wind and...
 
Comparisons of Shallow Foundations in Different Soil Condition
Comparisons of Shallow Foundations in Different Soil ConditionComparisons of Shallow Foundations in Different Soil Condition
Comparisons of Shallow Foundations in Different Soil Condition
 

Recently uploaded

原版制作(RMIT毕业证书)墨尔本皇家理工大学毕业证在读证明一模一样
原版制作(RMIT毕业证书)墨尔本皇家理工大学毕业证在读证明一模一样原版制作(RMIT毕业证书)墨尔本皇家理工大学毕业证在读证明一模一样
原版制作(RMIT毕业证书)墨尔本皇家理工大学毕业证在读证明一模一样
atwvhyhm
 
在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样
在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样
在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样
2zjra9bn
 
Introducing Gopay Mobile App For Environment.pptx
Introducing Gopay Mobile App For Environment.pptxIntroducing Gopay Mobile App For Environment.pptx
Introducing Gopay Mobile App For Environment.pptx
FauzanHarits1
 
lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789
lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789
lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789
Ghh
 
thyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatial
thyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatialthyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatial
thyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatial
Aditya Raghav
 
Status of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptx
Status of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptx
Status of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptx
MuhammadWaqasBaloch1
 
RECOGNITION AWARD 13 - TO ALESSANDRO MARTINS.pdf
RECOGNITION AWARD 13 - TO ALESSANDRO MARTINS.pdfRECOGNITION AWARD 13 - TO ALESSANDRO MARTINS.pdf
RECOGNITION AWARD 13 - TO ALESSANDRO MARTINS.pdf
AlessandroMartins454470
 
Job Finding Apps Everything You Need to Know in 2024
Job Finding Apps Everything You Need to Know in 2024Job Finding Apps Everything You Need to Know in 2024
Job Finding Apps Everything You Need to Know in 2024
SnapJob
 
一比一原版(UBC毕业证)不列颠哥伦比亚大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UBC毕业证)不列颠哥伦比亚大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(UBC毕业证)不列颠哥伦比亚大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UBC毕业证)不列颠哥伦比亚大学毕业证如何办理
pxyhy
 
一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙弗雷泽大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙弗雷泽大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙弗雷泽大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙弗雷泽大学毕业证如何办理
pxyhy
 
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
dsnow9802
 
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
Alliance Jobs
 
一比一原版(TMU毕业证)多伦多都会大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(TMU毕业证)多伦多都会大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(TMU毕业证)多伦多都会大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(TMU毕业证)多伦多都会大学毕业证如何办理
yuhofha
 
官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样
官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样
官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样
2zjra9bn
 
labb123456789123456789123456789123456789
labb123456789123456789123456789123456789labb123456789123456789123456789123456789
labb123456789123456789123456789123456789
Ghh
 
一比一原版(UVic毕业证)维多利亚大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UVic毕业证)维多利亚大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(UVic毕业证)维多利亚大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UVic毕业证)维多利亚大学毕业证如何办理
pxyhy
 
Lbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdf
Lbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdfLbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdf
Lbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdf
ashiquepa3
 
一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理
一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理
一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理
taqyea
 
A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024
A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024
A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024
Bruce Bennett
 
0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf
0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf
0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf
Thomas GIRARD BDes
 

Recently uploaded (20)

原版制作(RMIT毕业证书)墨尔本皇家理工大学毕业证在读证明一模一样
原版制作(RMIT毕业证书)墨尔本皇家理工大学毕业证在读证明一模一样原版制作(RMIT毕业证书)墨尔本皇家理工大学毕业证在读证明一模一样
原版制作(RMIT毕业证书)墨尔本皇家理工大学毕业证在读证明一模一样
 
在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样
在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样
在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样
 
Introducing Gopay Mobile App For Environment.pptx
Introducing Gopay Mobile App For Environment.pptxIntroducing Gopay Mobile App For Environment.pptx
Introducing Gopay Mobile App For Environment.pptx
 
lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789
lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789
lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789
 
thyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatial
thyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatialthyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatial
thyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatial
 
Status of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptx
Status of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptx
Status of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptx
 
RECOGNITION AWARD 13 - TO ALESSANDRO MARTINS.pdf
RECOGNITION AWARD 13 - TO ALESSANDRO MARTINS.pdfRECOGNITION AWARD 13 - TO ALESSANDRO MARTINS.pdf
RECOGNITION AWARD 13 - TO ALESSANDRO MARTINS.pdf
 
Job Finding Apps Everything You Need to Know in 2024
Job Finding Apps Everything You Need to Know in 2024Job Finding Apps Everything You Need to Know in 2024
Job Finding Apps Everything You Need to Know in 2024
 
一比一原版(UBC毕业证)不列颠哥伦比亚大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UBC毕业证)不列颠哥伦比亚大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(UBC毕业证)不列颠哥伦比亚大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UBC毕业证)不列颠哥伦比亚大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙弗雷泽大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙弗雷泽大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙弗雷泽大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(SFU毕业证)西蒙弗雷泽大学毕业证如何办理
 
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
 
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
 
一比一原版(TMU毕业证)多伦多都会大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(TMU毕业证)多伦多都会大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(TMU毕业证)多伦多都会大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(TMU毕业证)多伦多都会大学毕业证如何办理
 
官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样
官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样
官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样
 
labb123456789123456789123456789123456789
labb123456789123456789123456789123456789labb123456789123456789123456789123456789
labb123456789123456789123456789123456789
 
一比一原版(UVic毕业证)维多利亚大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UVic毕业证)维多利亚大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(UVic毕业证)维多利亚大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UVic毕业证)维多利亚大学毕业证如何办理
 
Lbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdf
Lbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdfLbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdf
Lbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdf
 
一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理
一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理
一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理
 
A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024
A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024
A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024
 
0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf
0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf
0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf
 

391239247-FEM-PPT.ppt

  • 1. Wind Load Analysis on Buildings and Structures Course Title-Finite Element Analysis Course No- CE G619 Instructor In Charge- Dr. PN Rao Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani Hyderabad Campus Civil Engineering Department Prepared by : Jhaveri Ronak Kirtikumar-2018H1430036H
  • 2. Wind Load Analysis as per American Code 2002 Upcoming Project Work References CONTENTS Wind Load Analysis as per IS 875:1987 (Part 3) Comparison of Wind Load Analysis with IS 875:2009 Introduction and Background
  • 3. OBJECTIVES • To Study the Basics of Wind Loads and it’s Variation with Height. • To Gain Design Knowledge on various structural elements like Beam,Column,Slab,Foundation etc. • To find the wind pressure by considering individual structural components and structure as a whole by IS Codes and compare it with American Codes • To Analyze and Design various Structures such as Multistorey Buildings, Bridges, Tunnels, Chimneys etc. • Analyze and Design Wind Load by ETABS.
  • 4. Variation of Wind Velocity with Height • Variation of Wind Velocity with Height Near the earth’s surface where the motion is Opposed and the wind speed is reduced by the surface friction. • At the surface , the wind speed reduces to zero and then begins to increase with height and at some height known as the gradient height, the motion may be considered to be free of the earth’s frictional influence and will attain its ‘gradient velocity’. • Gradient Height is considered as 300 m for flat ground& 550 m for very rough terrain
  • 5.
  • 6. Wind Load Analysis of Buildings and Other Structures as per IS 875:1987 Part 3 and IS 875:2009
  • 7. Obtain Base Wind Speed at Location Calculation of Design Wind Speed Calculation of Wind Pressure Calculation of Design Wind Pressure Wind Forces on Individual Structures Calculate Wind Forces on Structures and Plot it. Steps to Calculate Wind Force Acting on Structure
  • 8. Calculation of Design Wind Speed • Design wind speed is Mathematically expressed as Vz = Vb . K1 . K2 . K3 • Design Wind Speed depends on - 1) Risk Level 2) Terrain Roughness, Height and Size of Structure 3) Local Topography Here, Vz = Design Wind Speed at any Height in m/s Vb = Basic wind speed (Appendix A-Clause5.2) k1 = Probability Factor (Risk Coefficient) (clause 5.3.1) k2 = Terrain Height & Structure Size Factor (clause 5.3.2) k3 = Topography factor (clause 5.3.3)
  • 9. Basic Wind Speed (Vb) • Basic wind speed Vb depends on the location of the building. • For this purpose, The country is divided into various zones with specified wind speeds ranging from 33m/s to 55 m/s. • Basic wind speed is based on gust velocity averaged over a short time interval of 3 seconds at 10m height from mean ground level in an open terrain and for 50 years return period.
  • 10. Risk Coefficient (K1) • The Risk Coefficient K1 takes into account the degree of reliability required and the expected life of structure. The Design Life for various Buildings are as follows: 1. All general buildings (50 years) 2. Temporary sheds (5 years) 3. Less important Buildings ( 25 yrs) 4. Important Buildings ( 100 years)
  • 11. Terrain Height & Structure Size Factor (K2) • It depends upon Terrain Category and Building Class/Size of Structure. Four Terrain Categories are specified by the code depending on the availability of obstruction to the flow of wind. • Category 1: Refers to No Obstructions available to the Building e.g.- Sea Coasts and Flat Treeless Plains where other Structures if any are having Height less than 1.5m. • Category 2: Refers to Open Terrain with Scattered Obstructions of 1.5m to 10m Height. e.g- Industrial area. • Category 3: Refers to areas of Closely Spaced Buildings of height up to 10m e.g- Buildings at Outskirts of City • Category 4: Refers to area with Highly Closed Buildings of large Heights e.g- dense city area.
  • 12. Terrain Height & Structure Size Factor (K2) •K2 factor also depends on the Dimensions of the Building under considerations. •Based on Dimension of Building, the Structures are classified as: 1) Class A: Maximum of l, b, h<20m. 2) Class B: Maximum of l, b, h in between 20m to 50m. 3) Class C : Maximum of l, b, h > 50m.
  • 13. Topography Factor (K3) • It Depends on the Topography i.e Hill Region, Cliffs and Ridges. • If the Upward Ground Slope θ≤3◦, Value of K3 shall be taken as 1.0 • For θ>3◦ , The Value of K3 lies between 1.0 to 1.36. It can be determined by- K3 =1 + Cs • Shape factor varies considerably with proportion of structure & horizontal angle of incidence of the wind and it can be determined by using Appendix C as given in IS 875:1987 – part3
  • 14. Calculation of Design Wind Pressure • Wind Pressure due to Design Velocity can be determined by the following formula as given in IS 875:1987 part3 Pz=0.6 (𝑉z)2 Here, 𝑃z = Wind Pressure in N/m2 at Height z. 𝑉z = Design Wind Velocity in m/s at Height z. • As Per IS 875:2009 - Part 3 ,Few New Factors like Wind Directionality Factor, Area Averaging Factor, Combination Factor are introduced to make Design Economical, Hence Design Pressure is different from wind pressure which is given by following formula :- Pd = Kd . Ka . Kc . Pz Here , Pd = Design Wind Pressure in N/m2 at Height z. Pz = Wind Pressure in N/m2 at Height z. Kd = Wind Directionality Factor. Ka = Area Averaging Factor. Kc = Combination Factor.
  • 15. Wind Force on Individual Member • The Wind Load on individual structural elements such as roofs and walls, individual cladding units and their fittings, it is essential to take account of the pressure difference between opposite faces of such elements or units. • For calculation of wind force on individual cladding units following formula can be used:- F=(Cpe−Cpi) A Pd Here, Pd = design wind pressure in N/m2 at height z. Cpe = external pressure coefficient. Cpi = internal pressure coefficient. A = Surface area of structural element • Internal and External pressure coefficients for different units having different shapes, structures and slopes are described in IS 875 with figures.
  • 16. Wind Forces on Structures • The value of Force Coefficients apply to a building or structure as a whole, and when multiplied by the effective frontal area A of the building or structure and by design wind pressure, Pd gives the Total Wind Load on that particular building or structure. • It’s expression is given by F=(Cf ) A Pd Here, Pd =Design wind pressure at height z. Cf = Force coefficient of building. A = Surface area of structural element.
  • 18. Wind Load Analysis of Buildings and Other Structures as per ASCE-7 American Code (2002)
  • 19. Wind Loads According to ASCE 7 Wind Loads According to ASCE 7 • Wind loads are randomly applied Dynamic loads. • It depends on the wind speed, shape, height and topographic location of the structure. • The more the air is streamed, the less the reaction force exerted by the structure. • Wind force highly depends on the shape of the structure.
  • 20. Wind Loads According to ASCE 7 Wind Speed Curve in Different Region Sea Side Terrain Exposure Open Area Built Up Area Big City
  • 21. Wind Loads According to ASCE 7 Surface Roughness and Exposure Surface Roughness and Exposure Definitions Examples B Urban and suburban areas, wooded areas or other terrain with numerous closely spaced obstructions having the size of single-family dwellings or larger. C Open terrain with scattered obstructions having heights generally less than 30 ft (9.1 m). This category includes flat open country, grasslands, and all water surfaces in hurricane prone regions. D Flat, unobstructed areas and water surfaces outside hurricane prone regions. This category includes smooth mud flats, salt flats, and unbroken ice.
  • 22. Wind Loads According to ASCE 7 Basic Wind Speed (V) • Basic wind speed (V) based on 3-second gusts, 33 ft (10 m) above ground in a Ground Roughness Exposure C (defined in m/s). • Some regions such as: Taiwan, coastal China, coastal USA and Japan have very high wind speed and others such as: Indonesia, India and inland USA have lower wind speed
  • 23. Wind Loads According to ASCE 7 Wind Directionality Factor (Kd) • Wind Directionality Factor, Kd shall be determined from Table 6-4 of ASCE. • This factor means to accommodate the cross-sectional shape of the structure
  • 24. Wind Loads According to ASCE 7 Importance Factor, I • An importance factor (I) for the building or other structure shall be determined from Table 6-1 based on building and structure categories listed in Table 1-1. • This factor to accommodate the importance of the structure.
  • 25. Wind Loads According to ASCE 7 Velocity Pressure Coefficient (Kz) • Velocity Pressure Coefficient (Kz) depends on the site relative height to the ground z. •This means for roof top structure, z would be the total height of the component and the building its installed. •This factor is to accommodate the absolute height of the structure from ground level.
  • 26. Topographic Factor (Kzt), Force Coefficient (Cf ) • Local abrupt topography affects wind near the ground. • Wind speed depends on shape of hill, location of building and height above ground. • The value of Kzt was taken as 1 with assumption of flat region environment. • This factor is to accommodate the topographic area of the structure location • Force coefficient, Cf determined based on the shape of the structure is to accommodate the wind-facing area of the structure.
  • 27. Velocity Pressure (qz) • From Bernoulli’s equation of flow, the wind pressure can be calculated as: (q in psf, V in mph) • The velocity pressure qz evaluated at height z shall be calculated by:
  • 28. Wind Loads According to ASCE 7 • Design wind force for each component shall be determined by: • Gust effect factor, G, could be calculated by
  • 29. Comparison of wind Load Analysis of Buildings and Other structures by Indian Standard Codes and American Standard Codes
  • 30. Conclusion by Comparing with IS and ASCE Codes for Wind Load Analysis • ASCE:07 allows to use basic wind data by studying and analysing wind data which means more accurate local conditions can be considered and hence structure may be more economical as well as more strong. Local weather data study and its analysis should be allowed in Indian Codes too. • Wind Load for structure is calculated for 2 time taking only 1 case using IS 875: part3 while it is calculated for 12 times considering 4 different cases in case of ASCE-07:2002. • Base reactions as well as Shear forces in Y directions are zero as per IS 875 but it have positive value in case of ASCE-07. • Moments for both codes are almost equal. • Joint displacements are more in case of IS codes compared to that displacements calculated as per ASCE: 07
  • 31. Conclusion by Comparing with IS and ASCE Codes for Wind Load Analysis • Gust Factor method in IS 875 which is somewhat similar to analysis method in ASCE-07:2002 is yet to be developed fully as compared to ASCE code. • ASCE-07 consider 4 cases while IS875 consider only two cases to determine design wind pressure. Indian code should improve for determining wind load taking more cases, as more cases mean more precision and hence less risk. • American code is more effective for designing for wind loads as it gives less deformation as compared to Indian code. Less deformation means less chance for failure.
  • 32. REFERENCES 1) Council of Tall Buildings and Habitat Website (CTBUH). 2) Indian Standard Code- Code of Practice for all Design Loads (Other than Earthquake resisting system) for Buildings and Structures- IS:875: 1987: Part 3 Wind Loads. 3) Indian Standard Code Draft Version- IS 875:2009-Part 3 :- Draft version with commentary. 4) American Code: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE-7:2002 Version). 5) National Programme Technology Enhanced Learning- (NPTEL) Design of Reinforced Structures Part 1 and Part 2.
  • 33. 33