This document discusses sources of information bias in epidemiological studies. It describes different types of information bias including classification or measurement bias, differential versus non-differential bias, and direction of bias. Examples are provided of sources of error such as respondent bias from inability to recall or disclose accurately, data collector bias from unclear questions, and selection bias from only a portion of letters arriving in their destination in a classic study. Validation techniques and avoiding data collection errors are also discussed.
Case-control study is a variety of analytical studies. This is a brief presentation regarding history, design, issues, advantages - disadvantages and examples of Case-control study.
Case-control study is a variety of analytical studies. This is a brief presentation regarding history, design, issues, advantages - disadvantages and examples of Case-control study.
Shelley Hurwitz MedicReS World Congress 2014MedicReS
Biostatistics and Ethics Shelley Hurwitz, PhD Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Medical School Fellow, American Statistical Association Advisory Board on Ethics, International Statistical Institute
There Is A 90% Probability That Your Son Is Pregnant: Predicting The Future ...Health Catalyst
Predictive: Relating to or having the effect of predicting an event or result. Analytics: The systematic computational analysis of data or statistics. Together they make up one of the most popular topics in healthcare today. But predictive analytics is a means to an ends, and there is little good in predicting an event or result without a strategy for acting upon that event, when it happens. If, as the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation recently published, 80% of healthcare determinants fall outside of the healthcare delivery system as we traditionally define it, should we focus our predictive analytics on the traditional 20% of traditional healthcare delivery, or broaden our focus to the 80% that includes social and economic factors, physical environment, and lifestyle behaviors? What if our predictive models reveal to us that the highest risk variable to a patient’s length of life and quality of life is their economic status? Can an accountable care organization and patient centered medical home realistically do anything to reduce that risk, in reaction to the predictive model? Given the current availability and type of data in the healthcare ecosystem, and our organizational ability or inability to realistically intervene, where should we focus our predictive and interventional risk management strategies? There is enormous potential value in the application of predictive analytics to healthcare, but, in contrast to predicting the weather, credit risk, consumer purchasing habits, or college dropout rates, the data collection, and social and ethical complexities of applying predictive analytics in healthcare are significantly higher. This session will explore some of the less technical, more human interest and philosophical issues, associated with predictive analytics in healthcare, including the speaker’s experience prior to healthcare, in the US Air Force, National Security Agency, and manufacturing.
Ian's UnityHealth 2019 grand rounds suicide preventionIan Dawe
At the end of this presentation, you will :
1. Knowledgeably describe the problem of suicide in our
clients as an issue beyond just the traditional targets of our
medical interventions,
2. Understand concepts of quality and process improvement
as they relate to implementation of suicide prevention
strategies in hospital and community settings,
3. Become a champion of the Project Nøw approach to improve
care and outcomes for individuals at risk of suicide in
healthcare systems locally, provincially and nationally.
Adolescent Information Behavior: The Effect Of Privacy and ConfidentialitySamantha Connell
Teenagers are able to access a rich variety of information sources and have instant, hand-held access to a wealth of information. However, some sources of information sacrifice quality and reliability for anonymity and convenience when it comes to life-concern information seeking. A greater understanding is needed of how teenagers decide what specific sources are comfortable to use and what privacy factors might prevent teenagers from seeking information from reliable resources.
This Somali PHAST Step-by-Step Guide is modelled on the World Health Organisation PHAST Step-by-Step guide, which has been adapted for the Somali environment. The guide in its current appearance has come to being with the support and technical advise of Caritas Switzerland/Luxembourg (operational under the name SwissGroup) in collaboration with numerous Somali’s from community up to Ministry level, as well as others who contributed at all or some stages during the development of this Guide. This includes organizations such as Oxfam GB, COOPI, European Union, UNICEF, Save the Children UK, CEFA Somalia European Committee for Agricultural Training, Danish Refugee Council, German Red Cross/Somali Red Crescent Society, Action Contre la Faim, Concern Worldwide, Jacaranda Designs, Kenya Red Cross, and Tacitus Ltd. for their input into the training programmes. Special thanks also go to the IRC International Water & Sanitation Centre for their technical review.
The development of this lecture note for training Health Extension workers is an arduous assignment for Dr. Meseret Yazachew and Dr. Yihenew Alem at Jimma University.
This document was developed with inputs from many institutions and experts. Several individuals deserve special mention. Mary Arimond, Kathryn Dewey and Marie Ruel developed the analytical framework and provided technical oversight throughout the project. Eunyong Chung and Anne Swindale provided technical support. Nita Bhandari, Roberta Cohen, Hilary Creed de Kanashiro, Christine Hotz, Mourad Moursi, Helena Pachon and Cecilia C. Santos-Acuin conducted analysis of data sets. Chessa Lutter coordinated a working group to update the breastfeeding indicators. Mary Arimond and Megan Deitchler coordinated the working group that developed the Operational Guide on measurement issues which is a companion to this document. Bernadette Daelmans and José Martines coordinated the project throughout its phases. Participants in the consensus meetings held in Geneva 3–4 October 2006 and in Washington, DC 6–8 November 2007 provided invaluable inputs to formulate the recommendations put forward in this document.
POLICY MAKING PROCESS
Policy
• a statement of intent for achieving an objective.
• Deliberate statement aimed at achieving specific objective
• policies are formulated by the Government in order to provide
a guideline in attaining certain objectives for the benefit of the
people.
• Importance and objective of any policy
• to solve existing challenges/problems in any society
• used as a tool to safeguard and ensure better services to
members of the society.
• Reasons for formulating a Policy
• Reforms (socio-economic, technological advancements, etc)
within and outside the country.
Aim of nutritional assessment
To identify nutritional problems of the community
To find the underlying cause for malnutrition
To plan and implement control of malnutrition
Maintain good nutrition of community
Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Saeid Safari
Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists like Ozempic and Semiglutide
ASA GUIDELINE
NYSORA Guideline
2 Case Reports of Gastric Ultrasound
The prostate is an exocrine gland of the male mammalian reproductive system
It is a walnut-sized gland that forms part of the male reproductive system and is located in front of the rectum and just below the urinary bladder
Function is to store and secrete a clear, slightly alkaline fluid that constitutes 10-30% of the volume of the seminal fluid that along with the spermatozoa, constitutes semen
A healthy human prostate measures (4cm-vertical, by 3cm-horizontal, 2cm ant-post ).
It surrounds the urethra just below the urinary bladder. It has anterior, median, posterior and two lateral lobes
It’s work is regulated by androgens which are responsible for male sex characteristics
Generalised disease of the prostate due to hormonal derangement which leads to non malignant enlargement of the gland (increase in the number of epithelial cells and stromal tissue)to cause compression of the urethra leading to symptoms (LUTS
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Oleg Kshivets
RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2252.1±1742.5 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 73.2%, 10 years – 64.8%, 20 years – 42.5%. 513 LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3124.6±1525.6 days), 148 LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5054.4±1504.1 days).199 LCP died because of LC (LS=562.7±374.5 days). 5YS of LCP after bi/lobectomies was significantly superior in comparison with LCP after pneumonectomies (78.1% vs.63.7%, P=0.00001 by log-rank test). AT significantly improved 5YS (66.3% vs. 34.8%) (P=0.00000 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time (P=0.000-0.038). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12 (rank=2), thrombocytes/CC (3), erythrocytes/CC (4), eosinophils/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10); leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0).
CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) LC cell dynamics; 10) surgery type: lobectomy/pneumonectomy; 11) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracic surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis.
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdfAnurag Sharma
Microteaching is a unique model of practice teaching. It is a viable instrument for the. desired change in the teaching behavior or the behavior potential which, in specified types of real. classroom situations, tends to facilitate the achievement of specified types of objectives.
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar leads (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
Ethanol (CH3CH2OH), or beverage alcohol, is a two-carbon alcohol
that is rapidly distributed in the body and brain. Ethanol alters many
neurochemical systems and has rewarding and addictive properties. It
is the oldest recreational drug and likely contributes to more morbidity,
mortality, and public health costs than all illicit drugs combined. The
5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM-5) integrates alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence into a single
disorder called alcohol use disorder (AUD), with mild, moderate,
and severe subclassifications (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
In the DSM-5, all types of substance abuse and dependence have been
combined into a single substance use disorder (SUD) on a continuum
from mild to severe. A diagnosis of AUD requires that at least two of
the 11 DSM-5 behaviors be present within a 12-month period (mild
AUD: 2–3 criteria; moderate AUD: 4–5 criteria; severe AUD: 6–11 criteria).
The four main behavioral effects of AUD are impaired control over
drinking, negative social consequences, risky use, and altered physiological
effects (tolerance, withdrawal). This chapter presents an overview
of the prevalence and harmful consequences of AUD in the U.S.,
the systemic nature of the disease, neurocircuitry and stages of AUD,
comorbidities, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, genetic risk factors, and
pharmacotherapies for AUD.
Title: Sense of Smell
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the primary categories of smells and the concept of odor blindness.
Explain the structure and location of the olfactory membrane and mucosa, including the types and roles of cells involved in olfaction.
Describe the pathway and mechanisms of olfactory signal transmission from the olfactory receptors to the brain.
Illustrate the biochemical cascade triggered by odorant binding to olfactory receptors, including the role of G-proteins and second messengers in generating an action potential.
Identify different types of olfactory disorders such as anosmia, hyposmia, hyperosmia, and dysosmia, including their potential causes.
Key Topics:
Olfactory Genes:
3% of the human genome accounts for olfactory genes.
400 genes for odorant receptors.
Olfactory Membrane:
Located in the superior part of the nasal cavity.
Medially: Folds downward along the superior septum.
Laterally: Folds over the superior turbinate and upper surface of the middle turbinate.
Total surface area: 5-10 square centimeters.
Olfactory Mucosa:
Olfactory Cells: Bipolar nerve cells derived from the CNS (100 million), with 4-25 olfactory cilia per cell.
Sustentacular Cells: Produce mucus and maintain ionic and molecular environment.
Basal Cells: Replace worn-out olfactory cells with an average lifespan of 1-2 months.
Bowman’s Gland: Secretes mucus.
Stimulation of Olfactory Cells:
Odorant dissolves in mucus and attaches to receptors on olfactory cilia.
Involves a cascade effect through G-proteins and second messengers, leading to depolarization and action potential generation in the olfactory nerve.
Quality of a Good Odorant:
Small (3-20 Carbon atoms), volatile, water-soluble, and lipid-soluble.
Facilitated by odorant-binding proteins in mucus.
Membrane Potential and Action Potential:
Resting membrane potential: -55mV.
Action potential frequency in the olfactory nerve increases with odorant strength.
Adaptation Towards the Sense of Smell:
Rapid adaptation within the first second, with further slow adaptation.
Psychological adaptation greater than receptor adaptation, involving feedback inhibition from the central nervous system.
Primary Sensations of Smell:
Camphoraceous, Musky, Floral, Pepperminty, Ethereal, Pungent, Putrid.
Odor Detection Threshold:
Examples: Hydrogen sulfide (0.0005 ppm), Methyl-mercaptan (0.002 ppm).
Some toxic substances are odorless at lethal concentrations.
Characteristics of Smell:
Odor blindness for single substances due to lack of appropriate receptor protein.
Behavioral and emotional influences of smell.
Transmission of Olfactory Signals:
From olfactory cells to glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, involving lateral inhibition.
Primitive, less old, and new olfactory systems with different path
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnatakaaddon Scans
As flu season approaches, health officials in Bangalore, Karnataka, are urging residents to get their flu vaccinations. The seasonal flu, while common, can lead to severe health complications, particularly for vulnerable populations such as young children, the elderly, and those with underlying health conditions.
Dr. Vidisha Kumari, a leading epidemiologist in Bangalore, emphasizes the importance of getting vaccinated. "The flu vaccine is our best defense against the influenza virus. It not only protects individuals but also helps prevent the spread of the virus in our communities," he says.
This year, the flu season is expected to coincide with a potential increase in other respiratory illnesses. The Karnataka Health Department has launched an awareness campaign highlighting the significance of flu vaccinations. They have set up multiple vaccination centers across Bangalore, making it convenient for residents to receive their shots.
To encourage widespread vaccination, the government is also collaborating with local schools, workplaces, and community centers to facilitate vaccination drives. Special attention is being given to ensuring that the vaccine is accessible to all, including marginalized communities who may have limited access to healthcare.
Residents are reminded that the flu vaccine is safe and effective. Common side effects are mild and may include soreness at the injection site, mild fever, or muscle aches. These side effects are generally short-lived and far less severe than the flu itself.
Healthcare providers are also stressing the importance of continuing COVID-19 precautions. Wearing masks, practicing good hand hygiene, and maintaining social distancing are still crucial, especially in crowded places.
Protect yourself and your loved ones by getting vaccinated. Together, we can help keep Bangalore healthy and safe this flu season. For more information on vaccination centers and schedules, residents can visit the Karnataka Health Department’s official website or follow their social media pages.
Stay informed, stay safe, and get your flu shot today!
HOT NEW PRODUCT! BIG SALES FAST SHIPPING NOW FROM CHINA!! EU KU DB BK substit...GL Anaacs
Contact us if you are interested:
Email / Skype : kefaya1771@gmail.com
Threema: PXHY5PDH
New BATCH Ku !!! MUCH IN DEMAND FAST SALE EVERY BATCH HAPPY GOOD EFFECT BIG BATCH !
Contact me on Threema or skype to start big business!!
Hot-sale products:
NEW HOT EUTYLONE WHITE CRYSTAL!!
5cl-adba precursor (semi finished )
5cl-adba raw materials
ADBB precursor (semi finished )
ADBB raw materials
APVP powder
5fadb/4f-adb
Jwh018 / Jwh210
Eutylone crystal
Protonitazene (hydrochloride) CAS: 119276-01-6
Flubrotizolam CAS: 57801-95-3
Metonitazene CAS: 14680-51-4
Payment terms: Western Union,MoneyGram,Bitcoin or USDT.
Deliver Time: Usually 7-15days
Shipping method: FedEx, TNT, DHL,UPS etc.Our deliveries are 100% safe, fast, reliable and discreet.
Samples will be sent for your evaluation!If you are interested in, please contact me, let's talk details.
We specializes in exporting high quality Research chemical, medical intermediate, Pharmaceutical chemicals and so on. Products are exported to USA, Canada, France, Korea, Japan,Russia, Southeast Asia and other countries.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTHCARE.pdfAnujkumaranit
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the simulation of human intelligence processes by machines, especially computer systems. It encompasses tasks such as learning, reasoning, problem-solving, perception, and language understanding. AI technologies are revolutionizing various fields, from healthcare to finance, by enabling machines to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence.
Title: Sense of Taste
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the structure and function of taste buds.
Describe the relationship between the taste threshold and taste index of common substances.
Explain the chemical basis and signal transduction of taste perception for each type of primary taste sensation.
Recognize different abnormalities of taste perception and their causes.
Key Topics:
Significance of Taste Sensation:
Differentiation between pleasant and harmful food
Influence on behavior
Selection of food based on metabolic needs
Receptors of Taste:
Taste buds on the tongue
Influence of sense of smell, texture of food, and pain stimulation (e.g., by pepper)
Primary and Secondary Taste Sensations:
Primary taste sensations: Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter, Umami
Chemical basis and signal transduction mechanisms for each taste
Taste Threshold and Index:
Taste threshold values for Sweet (sucrose), Salty (NaCl), Sour (HCl), and Bitter (Quinine)
Taste index relationship: Inversely proportional to taste threshold
Taste Blindness:
Inability to taste certain substances, particularly thiourea compounds
Example: Phenylthiocarbamide
Structure and Function of Taste Buds:
Composition: Epithelial cells, Sustentacular/Supporting cells, Taste cells, Basal cells
Features: Taste pores, Taste hairs/microvilli, and Taste nerve fibers
Location of Taste Buds:
Found in papillae of the tongue (Fungiform, Circumvallate, Foliate)
Also present on the palate, tonsillar pillars, epiglottis, and proximal esophagus
Mechanism of Taste Stimulation:
Interaction of taste substances with receptors on microvilli
Signal transduction pathways for Umami, Sweet, Bitter, Sour, and Salty tastes
Taste Sensitivity and Adaptation:
Decrease in sensitivity with age
Rapid adaptation of taste sensation
Role of Saliva in Taste:
Dissolution of tastants to reach receptors
Washing away the stimulus
Taste Preferences and Aversions:
Mechanisms behind taste preference and aversion
Influence of receptors and neural pathways
Impact of Sensory Nerve Damage:
Degeneration of taste buds if the sensory nerve fiber is cut
Abnormalities of Taste Detection:
Conditions: Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Dysgeusia (parageusia)
Causes: Nerve damage, neurological disorders, infections, poor oral hygiene, adverse drug effects, deficiencies, aging, tobacco use, altered neurotransmitter levels
Neurotransmitters and Taste Threshold:
Effects of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) on taste sensitivity
Supertasters:
25% of the population with heightened sensitivity to taste, especially bitterness
Increased number of fungiform papillae
1. 3/22/2011 Sources of error: Information bias 1
Sources of error: Information bias
Principles of Epidemiology for Public Health (EPID600)
Victor J. Schoenbach, PhD home page
Department of Epidemiology
Gillings School of Global Public Health
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
www.unc.edu/epid600/
2. 11/5/2001 Sources of error: Information bias 2
Abort, Retry, Fail
“Tips for safer drives: Never turn off a
PC or accessories while the computer
is on or the disk is active.”
— USA Today
[PC Magazine, 10/3/1996]
3. Chapter 1
THE HISTORIAN'S TASK:
Insight into the future
History, a record of things left behind
by past generations, started in 1815.
Thus we should try to view historical
times as the behind of the present.
Anders Henriiksson (ed), Non Campus Mentis, NY,
Workman Publishing Co., 2003
4. Non Campus Mentis
“History, as we know, is always bias,
because human beings have to be
studied by other human beings, not by
independent observers of another
species.”
Anders Henriiksson (ed), Non Campus Mentis, NY,
Workman Publishing Co., 2003, chapter 1
5. 3/22/2011 Sources of error: Information bias 5
Information bias
Information bias: a systematic distortion
or error that arises from the procedures
used for classification or measurement
of the disease, the exposure, or other
relevant variables.
6. 3/22/2011 Sources of error: Information bias 6
Information bias
• Classification or measurement
• Differential or nondifferential bias
• Direction of bias
• Misclassification of covariables
7. 3/22/2011 Sources of error: Information bias 7
Classification or measurement
• Data for epidemiologic studies consist
of classifications (e.g., “hypertensive” vs.
“normotensive”) or measurements (e.g., 120
mmHg systolic BP).
• Possible sources of measurement or
classification error include instrumentation,
laboratories, records, respondents; data
collectors, managers, analysts, and
interpreters.
8. 3/22/2011 Sources of error: Information bias 8
Sources of measurement error
Respondent (interview, questionnaire):
• inability to understand, recall, articulate;
• unwillingness to disclose
• social desirability influences
Can be influenced by wording of
questions and how they are asked.
9. 9
Example of misunderstanding
• Medico – Não consigo encontrar o
motivo das suas dores, meu caro. Só
pode ser por causa da bebida.
• Paciente – Não tem importãncia,
doutor. Eu volto outro dia que o senhor
estiver sóbrio.
De Luciana V. Paiva, Osasco - SP, en Bom Humor Nosso E Dos Leitores”,
Almanaque Brasil de Cultura Popular. Maio 2001;3(26)
(almanaquebrasil@uol.com.br). Exemplar de quem viaja TAM.
10. 3/22/2011 Sources of error: Information bias 10
How not to ask questions
“Has anyone ever tried to give you the
mistaken idea that sex intercourse is
necessary for the health of the young man?
(from a survey by the NC state health officer, circa 1926,
summarized in Kinsey et al., 1948)
Can you guess the right answer?
11. 3/27/2007 Sources of error: Information bias 11
Respondent cognitive processes
• Respondent cognitive processes: interpretation,
recall, judgment formation, response formatting,
editing
• Qualitative research on response processes, e.g.:
• “What types of physical activity or exercise did you
perform during the past month?”
• “What did you think we meant when we said ‘physical
activity’?”
• “Which, if any, of the following would you (also)
consider to be physical activity?
www.minority.unc.edu/institute/2000/materials/slides/RichardWarnecke-2000-06-08.ppt
12. 3/27/2007 Sources of error: Information bias 12
Cognitive testing - 2
Recalling and retrieving – Retrieval probes:
• Recall strategy
• Recall interval
• Search strategy (proximal, distal, anywhere)
• Long term recall - link to events to help
remember
• Recall frame of reference--what kinds of
things helped you remember?
www.minority.unc.edu/institute/2000/materials/slides/RichardWarnecke-2000-06-08.ppt
13. 3/22/2011 Sources of error: Information bias 13
Surveys and Questionnaires
• Survey validation
• Pretesting (wording, item sequence, time)
• Pilot testing (all steps - procedure, item
performance)
• Translation validation
Sources of error: Information bias 13
14. 3/27/2007 Sources of error: Information bias 14
Sources of measurement error
• Data collector: unclear or ambiguous
questions, lack of a neutral demeanor,
insufficiently conscientious, inaccurate
transcription, fraud
15. 11/5/2001 Sources of error: Information bias 15
Sources of measurement error
• Data managers: inaccurate transcription,
mis-reading, miscoding, programming
errors
• Data analysts: variable coding and
programming errors
• Data interpreters: inadequate
appreciation of the characteristics of the
measure or of the relations being studied
16. 11/5/2001 Sources of error: Information bias 16
Techniques for avoiding data collection errors
• Precise operational definitions of variables
• Detailed measurement protocols
• Repeated measurements on key variables
• Training, certification, and re-certification
• Data audits (of interviewers, of data centers)
• Data cleaning – visual, computer
• Re-running all analyses prior to publication
17. 11/5/2009 Sources of error: Information bias 17
Validation and agreement
• Sensitivity and specificity – used to evaluate
classifications
• When no validation standard, we measure
agreement
• Measures of agreement often correct for
“chance”
18. 11/5/2001 Sources of error: Information bias 18
Information bias – differential
or non-differential
• Important question for any kind of bias –
are error processes different for groups
being compared
• If no, “non-differential”
• If yes, “differential”
• Has implications for direction of bias
• In general, non-differential is safer
19. 3/22/2011 Sources of error: Information bias 19
Direction of bias
• “Upward”
• “Downward”
• “Towards the null”
• “Away from the null”
Null = 0 (for differences)
1 (for ratios)
20. 11/5/2001 Sources of error: Information bias 20
Direction of bias
In simple situation, information bias is
towards the null IF:
1. Dichotomous exposure and disease
2. Non-differential misclassification with
both sensitivity and specificity each
greater than 0.5; AND
3. Errors in one variable are independent
of errors in the other
21. 11/5/2001 Sources of error: Information bias 21
Errors in covariables
• It is almost always important to control for
other variables (e.g., age)
• Errors in measurement of these variables
hamper attempts to control for them
• Direction of bias is generally unpredictable
22. 3/22/2011 Sources of error: Information bias 22
Classic studies – 6 degrees of separation?
• Classic experiment by Yale psychologist Stanley
Milgram asked people in Kansas to forward a
letter to a target person in Massachusetts
• If did not know target person, then send it to
someone they thought might know him
• Milgram’s 1967 paper reported that it only took 5
jumps, on average, for letters to arrive
23. 3/29/2005 Sources of error: Information bias 23
Selection bias in a classic study
According to Judith Kleinfeld,
psychologist at the University of Alaska,
Fairbanks, archives reveal that only
30% of the letters actually reached their
destination!
(Gewolb, Josh. Random samples. Science 26
October 2001;294:777. See Kleinfeld, Judith S.
Society. Jan/Feb2002; 39(2):61-66)
24. 24
Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research
Alfred S. Kinsey (photograph from Wardell B. Pomeroy,
Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research)
25. 25
Sex research in the mid-20th
century
Alfred S. Kinsey (photograph from Wardell B. Pomeroy,
Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research)
26. 11/7/2005 26
Kinsey et al. on selection and information bias
(Alfred C. Kinsey, Wardell B. Pomeroy, Clyde E.
Martin. Sexual behavior in the human male, Phila,
W.B. Saunders, 1948)
Alfred S. Kinsey (photograph from Wardell B. Pomeroy,
Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research)
28. 3/22/2011 Sources of error: Information bias 28
Real-life example: Quit for Life
• Randomized trial of smoking cessation
interventions
• Self-reported “In the past 7 days, have you
smoked a cigarette, even a puff?”
• Attempted (unsuccessfully) to validate with
saliva cotinine
• People who did not give a time to be called
for validation had very high quit rates!
29. 29
Kinsey biography by Wardell Pomeroy
Pomeroy, Wardell B. Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex
Research NY, Signet / New American Library, 1972: p136
30. Non Campus Mentis
“Hindsight, after all, is caused by a
lack of foresight.”
Anders Henriiksson (ed), Non Campus Mentis, NY,
Workman Publishing Co., 2003, chapter 1
Here’s some good advice from USA Today, courtesy of the late PC Magazine’s Abort, Retry, Fail:
“Tips for safer drives: Never turn off a PC or accessories while the computer is on or the disk is active.”
— USA Today [PC Magazine, 10/3/1996]
And now a few selections from Anders Henriiksson (ed), Non Campus Mentis, NY: Workman Publishing Co., 2003
From Chapter 1 THE HISTORIAN'S TASK:Insight into the future
“History, a record of things left behind by past generations, started in 1815. Thus we should try to view historical times as the behind of the present.”
Come to think of it, we do save a lot of time by starting in 1815.
And:
“History, as we know, is always bias, because human beings have to be studied by other human beings, not by independent observers of another species.”
Anders Henriiksson (ed), Non Campus Mentis, NY: Workman Publishing Co., 2003, chapter 1
There’s actually quite a bit of truth to that observation.
So now we turn to information bias. Information bias refers to a systematic distortion or error that arises from the procedures used for classification or measurement of the disease, the exposure, or other relevant variables.
Our overview of information bias is organized into four subtopics: classification or measurement, differential or non-differential bias, the direction of bias, misclassification of a variable other than the disease or primary exposure (a “covariable”). I’ll spend most of the time on the first one.
Data for epidemiologic studies consist of classifications, such as “hypertensive” vs. “normotensive”, or measurements, such as 120 mm Hg systolic blood pressure.
Any data source or means of data collection or transmission can be a source of error. So possible sources of measurement or classification error include instrumentation, such as sphygmomanometers, laboratory assays, medical records, interview responses, data collectors, data managers, data analysts, and data interpreters.
A great deal of epidemiologic data comes from respondents, either directly through interviews and questionnaires, or indirectly, through information provided by respondents during clinical encounters and recorded in the medical record. Respondents may misunderstand questions, may be unable to recall the requested information, may be unable to articulate the information precisely or understandably, may be unwilling to disclose the information, or may give a response they regard as more socially desirable than the unvarnished truth.
Poor quality or wrong information from respondents, whether from interviews, self-administered questionnaires, or audio - computer assisted self interviewing (A-CASI) is at least partly a function of the quality of the questions and the way they are asked.
Or, consider the following question from a study by the state health officer of North Carolina, published in 1926 and summarized in the first of the Kinsey Reports):
“Has anyone ever tried to give you the mistaken idea that sex intercourse is necessary for the health of the young man?”
(Hughes, W. L. 1926. Sex experiences of boyhood. J. Soc. Hyg. 12:262-273, summarized in Alfred C. Kinsey, Wardell B. Pomeroy, Clyde E. Martin. Sexual behavior in the human male, Phila, W.B. Saunders, 1948, p.26)
How would you respond?
Cognitive testing is a methodology for exploring how people interpret and respond to survey questions. Richard Warnecke gave an overview of some of the cognitive processes involved in a presentation for the Annual Summer Public Health Research Videoconference on Minority Health (his abstract, slides, and references are available at www.minority.unc.edu/institute/2000/materials/abstracts.htm#Richard ).
In his presentation, Warnecke identified five distinct steps in the process through which a respondent answers a question: interpretation, recall, judgment formation, response formatting, response editing. He also explained how to use qualitative research techniques to gain insight into how respondents carry out each of these steps. I’ll illustrate the first two steps.
For example, for the question “What types of physical activity or exercise did you perform during the past month?”, the researcher could ask a small group of people questions like:
“What did you think we meant when we said ‘physical activity’?”
and
“Which, if any, of the following would you (also) consider to be physical activity? what about . . . walking, housework, such as cleaning the bathroom or kitchen, work-related activity, such as construction, yard work, such as mowing the lawn or raking leaves?”
Once the respondent has interpreted (decoded) the question, the second step is to recall the requested information. The recall process involves retrieving relevant information from memory. To study the process of recalling and retrieving, the investigator can ask respondents to describe how they went about recalling the information for the answer. Probes would attempt to understand the strategy used, the interval over which recall was attempted (especially if the interval was not specified in the question), the search strategy (e.g., start in the present and move backward, start in the past and move forward, or try to think of events anywhere in the past), links to events to boost long term recall, and frames of references employed.
Investment in qualitative research for constructing the questions will improve the accuracy and consistency of the data and improve their interpretation.
If a survey instrument is used to collect information about the exposure, outcome, or other covariates, the questionnaire is typically reviewed several times to ensure accuracy, completeness, and “face validity” (i.e., the questions appear to be valid). Surveys are reviewed by knowledgeable colleagues and then pretested on a small group of participants to ensure that the questions are being interpreted correctly and estimate the length of the questionnaire. The questionnaire should then be pilot-tested to ensure that it works as it will be used in the field. Responses can be analyzed to get a preview of how well the items are working and discard or reformulate ones that are not useful (e.g., no variability).
As research becomes more global, often surveys need to be translated into other languages. In order to maintain the integrity of the survey (and ensure cultural appropriateness and linguistic correctness), the validation process may be repeated in the translated version. The translated version should also be translated back to the original language (called “back-translation”) to verify the accuracy of original translation.
Meanwhile, the data collector, e.g., an interviewer, may ask questions that are unclear or ambiguous, may lack a neutral demeanor thereby encouraging a socially-desirable response or discouraging disclosure, may be insufficiently conscientious in following the protocol, may transcribe information inaccurately, or may engage in outright fraudulent behavior. The last of these may come as a surprise to many of you. But the sad truth is that though most interviewers are conscientious and honest, as in so many areas there are people who are highly susceptible to the temptation to take shortcuts. It is much easier to fill out questionnaires in the comfort of one’s living room than to drive to people’s houses and try to get them to answer the questions or try to reach them on the telephone. It is therefore standard procedure to verify a percentage of interviews to detect such shortcuts. In one study with which I was familiar, a student research assistant was caught manufacturing data, and in another a survey contractor reported that one of their telephone interviewers was caught manufacturing telephone interviews.
Measurement error can come at any place where data are generated, edited, managed, coded, or interpreted. Instrumentation, for example, can be functioning in an unreliable or erroneous fashion. During data management, errors can arise through inaccurate transcription (“keying”), misreading, miscoding, and programming errors.
Data analysts can introduce errors through variable coding and programming (I once destroyed the meaning of a variable through a faulty programming recode in constructing an epidemiology final exam [not for EPID600 or EPID710, which I used to teach, I’m relieved to say; though perhaps this is why I’ve never taught EPID715!], the error presumably did not harm the exam and was fortunately detected before the data were used as a case-example in a professional presentation, but who knows what other data management errors I have made that I have not discovered). (No one is completely immune: see, for example, www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nsfg/Cyc7MaleLSEXRLTN_errata.pdf ).
Data interpretation can be compromised by inadequate appreciation of the characteristics of the measure or of the relations being studied. In some circumstances misinterpretation can be regarded as information bias. For example, studies of racial/ethnic disparities often find that disparities remain even after controlling for socioeconomic status, prompting biological hypotheses. But problems such as the inadequacy of socioeconomic status measurement make such reasoning faulty. (E.g., see Kaufman JS, Cooper RS, McGee DL, Epidemiology 1997;8(6):621-628.)
Epidemiologic research uses various techniques to avoid or at least minimize these myriad sources of error. Such techniques include the use of precise, operational definitions for all study variables, use of detailed, written measurement protocols (for an elaborate example, see www.cscc.unc.edu/aric/), the practice of making repeated measurements on key variables; training, certification, and re-certification for data collectors; audits of data collected by interviewers and by data centers in a multi-center study; data cleaning by visual review and by computer checks; and independently re-running all analyses prior to publishing results.
Earlier in the course we described the use of sensitivity and specificity to evaluate the accuracy of a screening test. These same measures are used to evaluate the accuracy of classifications for other purposes
When there is no validation standard (often called a “gold standard”) then we can assess the classification only in regard to agreement – how often the two measurements on the same person agree – rather than for accuracy. Some agreement can occur by chance, of course, so we often use a measure of agreement, such as the kappa statistic, that adjusts for the amount of agreement expected by chance. Because many conditions studied by epidemiologists are rare, we would often expect a great deal of agreement to occur by chance.
The concept of whether errors are differential or non-differential in respect to groups being compared arises for both selection bias and information bias. The question concerns whether the processes that create the errors operate differently for the different groups being compared. If the processes do not operate differently, then the error is termed “nondifferential”. If the error processes do operate differently, then the error is termed “differential”.
For the most part, selection bias arises when selection processes (e.g., nonresponse) are differential. Information bias, in contrast, often occurs whether the error processes operate in the same way in all groups or not. But whether errors are differential or nondifferential may have implications for the direction of the bias that may result. For example, misclassification is nondifferential if the sensitivity (and specificity) for disease detection is the same in the exposed and unexposed groups and the sensitivity (and specificity) for classification of exposure is the same for cases and non-cases. (Note: “Nondifferential” does not mean that sensitivity equals specificity, as people sometimes assume.)
In general, nondifferential errors are somewhat less problematic, and one objective of study design and conduct is to make sure that where errors cannot be prevented at least they should be nondifferential. What masking of data collectors, laboratory technicians, and investigators achieves is to ensure that data errors are nondifferential.
In the selection bias lecture we talked about the different terms for describing the direction of a bias. Most selection biases are best characterized as “upward” or “downward.” It is for information bias that the terms “towards the null” and “away from the null” become relevant. Recall that the null value of a ratio measure of association is 1.0. If information bias causes the observed association to be closer to 1.0 than the true association, regardless of whether the true ratio is below 1.0 or above 1.0, then the situation is termed “bias towards the null”. Conversely, if the observed association is farther from 1.0 than is the true association, regardless of whether the true association is below 1.0 or above 1.0, then the situation is termed “bias away from the null”. The distinction between “negative bias” and “bias towards the null” is that, in principle, negative bias could make a truly positive association appear negative, whereas bias towards the null could conceal a truly positive association but could not reverse it (i.e., move the observed association “through the null”).
Since scientists prefer to be conservative (and especially prefer that other scientists be conservative), bias away from the null is generally regarded as a greater threat. If we can be certain that bias is towards the null, then when we find an association we can take comfort in the implication that the true effect must be stronger than the one we are reporting.
It turns out that in a somewhat simple situation, but one that does arise, we can be reasonably confident that information bias will be towards the null. This situation involves (1) a dichotomous (i.e., “yes” vs. “no”) disease and exposure variables, (2) misclassification that is nondifferential – errors in the classification of disease are not affected by the value of the exposure, and errors in the classification of exposure are not affected by the value of the disease variable – and sensitivity and specificity are both better than 50%, and (3) error processes that are independent – an error in measuring exposure is no more likely to occur if there is an error in measuring disease, and vice-versa. In this somewhat special situation, it can be shown that the observed ratio measure of association will be closer to 1.0 than the measure would have been if there were no bias. Since this influence will occur whether the true association is less than 1.0 or greater than 1.0, “towards the null” is the best way to characterize the direction of bias.
It is thus comforting to conclude that errors are nondifferential and independent, since the implication is that an observed association reflects a stronger one in the population. However, that conclusion is probably wishful thinking more often then we would like to believe. For example, if both disease and exposure are measured by interview, a bad interviewer will tend to introduce errors in both exposure and disease, so that errors processes will not be independent.
One final topic is errors in covariables – variables other than the disease and primary exposure. Epidemiologic studies almost always control for other variables, such as age, gender, education, and other risk factors for the disease being studied. Measurement of these variables is also susceptible to error, of course. Errors in measurement and classification of control variables hamper our attempts to control for them. The direction of information bias arising from errors in classification and measurement of control variables is generally unpredictable.
Information bias is probably one of the greatest challenges in conducting epidemiologic research.
Now I’ll offer some real-life examples of selection and information bias.
As I was writing the first version of this lecture I happened across an article that had just appeared in Science magazine. The article reported a re-analysis of data from a classic experiment by Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram. That experiment recruited a set of people in Kansas, gave each a letter, and asked the person to please forward the letter to a target person in Massachusetts. If the participant did not know the target person, as was generally the case, the instruction was to forward it to someone s/he thought might know the target person. In the paper, Milgram and colleagues report that it took only 5 jumps, on average, for the letters to arrive to the target people (this was the pre-Internet era). The finding generated considerable popular interest, since it reinforced the notion that we live in a “small world” in which people are basically connected.
According to the article in the October 2001 issue of Science, however, Judith Kleinfeld, a psychologist at the University of Alaska in Fairbanks, found from the archives that only 30% of the letters actually reached their destination. The remaining 70% had simply never arrived. So the “average of 5 jumps” was based on the highly selected subsample that had reached their destination, and so “5 jumps” greatly overstates the extent of connectedness. To an epidemiologist, this situation is a rather severe case of selection bias.
Gewolb, Josh. Random samples. Science 26 October 2001;294:777
Kleinfeld, Judith S. Society. Jan/Feb2002; 39(2):61-66
(For much more on what Judith Kleinfeld found in the Milgram archives, see her webpage at http://www.judithkleinfeld.com/ar_bigworld.html)
An area where I’ve carried some of my own research is sexual behavior, so I thought it would be interesting to examine some of the pioneering work in the area. Alfred Kinsey and his colleagues were true pioneers in the scientific study of sexuality in the U.S. While there is much to criticize from our present-day vantage point – and they were aware of many of the shortcomings of the methodology they used – the Kinsey Reports are a landmark in the scientific study of human sexuality and helped to pave the way for all that has come since its appearance. The magnitude of the contribution of the Kinsey studies is illustrated by the fact that when the AIDS epidemic appeared about 30 years after their publication, public health officials were having to rely on the Kinsey data for estimates of the prevalence of male homosexuality in the U.S.
In evaluating the Kinsey studies, it is important to keep in mind the social climate of the era in which these researchers worked. As they describe it in the Male volume, “There seem to have been two chief sources of these objections. Some of the psychologists contended that sexual behavior involved primarily psychological problems, and that no biologist was qualified to make such a study. Some of the sociologists felt that the problems were for the most part social, and that neither a biologist nor a psychologist was the right person to make a sex study. A few of the psychoanalysts felt that sexual behavior could not properly be studied by anyone but a psychoanalyst. One group of physicians objected that taking histories constituted clinical practice, and that all such studies should be made by clinicians inside of clinics.” (page 12)
The Kinsey researchers were quite aware of the hazards of selection bias. They adopted an interesting technique that they referred to as “hundred percent samples”:
“Since it is impossible to secure a strictly randomized sample, the best substitute is to secure one hundred percent of the persons in each social unit from which the sample is drawn. One hundred percent of the members of a family group, all the persons living in a particular apartment house, all the members of a college sorority or fraternity, all the persons in some service club, all the members of some Sunday School class or some other church organization, all the persons in a city block, all the persons in a rural township, all the inmates of some penal or other institution, all the persons in some other unit, provided that unit has not been brought together by a common sexual interest.”
Sexual behavior in the human male, p. 93
Other parts of the volume demonstrate their great attention to avoiding information bias as well. For example, training interviewers included putting the subject at ease, ensuring privacy, establishing rapport, carefully sequencing topics, recording information during the interview, using a standardized outline, asking direct questions without hesitation or bias, placing the burden of denial on the subject, avoiding compound questions, employing rapid-fire questioning with cross-checks for consistency, and avoiding any discussion of non-sexual controversial issues such as politics, religion, etc. (pp.47-58)
Before I began studying sexual behavior, I worked on two randomized trials to help people quit smoking. In one of these studies it appeared that information bias was a concern for the key outcome, quitting smoking. The study, called Quit or Life, was carried out in the late 1980s among policyholders of the North Carolina Mutual Life Insurance Company, headquartered in Durham, NC. The study recruited about 2,000 policyholders in 32 NC Mutual sales districts. These were people who said that they wanted to quit smoking and planned to quit in the next year.
The study was a randomized trial of self-help methods for quitting smoking. Agents in half of the districts presented a quit smoking packet to the participants, and agents in all 32 districts collected follow-up questionnaires 4 and 8 months later. The primary outcome variable was quitting status, as assessed by the standard item “In the past 7 days, have you smoked a cigarette, even a puff”.
We attempted to validate answers by collecting saliva specimens to test for levels of cotinine. Cotinine is a metabolic product of nicotine and a reasonably good indicator of whether someone has been exposed to nicotine, especially as an active smoker. However, we were unsuccessful in obtaining specimens from most self-reported quitters.
The questionnaire did ask, though, when would be a good time to schedule an appointment to collect a saliva specimen if we needed to do so. Most people answered the question by choosing “evenings” or “weekends”, but some people either wrote in “none” or “don’t call” or they left the question unanswered. Participants who did not provide a time to be called turned out to have very high reported rates of quitting, suggesting the possibility of information bias in their quitting status – or an unsuspected predictor of quitting!
(The Quit for Life study is described at http://www.epidemiolog.net/pub/qfl/ )
Finally, I thought that you might enjoy this anecdote from one of the co-authors of the two main Kinsey Reports, Sexual behavior in the human male and Sexual behavior in the human female:
“Early in the research I went to a cocktail party in New York with Kinsey, and a dozen or so psychiatrists were among the guests, accompanied by their wives or mistresses, as the case might be. We resolved to obtain the sexual histories of everyone there. I was only thirty years old at the time, and viewed the prospect with some anxiety, since I was a little overawed by the company.
“Spotting a pretty young girl in her twenties, I concluded that it would be easier for me to ask for her history than to confront one of the older and more formidable psychiatrists. Employing everything Kinsey had taught me, I appealed for her cooperation, citing the scientific approach, the anonymity and the need for the information we were collecting. Everyone at the party was going to help us, I told her.
“She listened attentively to everything I said, and when I paused she smiled sweetly and remarked, ‘But, Mr. Pomeroy, it’s been less than two weeks since you took my history.’
“Making a rapid recovery, I assured her, ‘Well, you see, there's the proof - we not only forget the histories after we record them, but we forget the people, too.’ I hoped she found this reassuring, if not flattering.”
Pomeroy, Wardell B. Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research NY, Signet / New American Library, 1972: p136
And to close, here is another student answer that is humorous but also insightful.