1. PRELIMINARY EVALUATION SHEET
Quality of Summary My honest evaluation- what Strategies put forward to
was done well and what was make sure a high quality is
not of good standard? Try to maintained.
cite specific example and
moments from your video
Quality of holding a shot The camera was mostly Need to use a tripod for the
steady steady but at some stages is real thing to make sure its
moved to fast so resulted steady.
blurry.
Quality of the framing shots To many medium shots and Use a Varity of shots by using
over the headshots so got our notes present when were
tedious. The over the filing we will know what ones
headshot wasn’t always to do.
clear it showed to much of
the back head instead of
straight over the shoulder.
Quality of shooting material We done what was asked by Try to plan together more
appropriate to the task set- filming a short interview with instead of independent
i.e. the content of your film conversation and done all planning and then bringing
pre and post editing was the prep. Our editing skills ideas to group, if we do it all
consistent with the exam will need to improve but was together it will save time and
directives at a basic standard. So move creative.
overall that was successful
Quality of selecting mise-en- Our mise en scene wasn’t Plan and book if necessary
scène including colour, figure, that good simply because our set and make sure
lighting, objects and setting; we didn’t have the right camera film is empty. Make
setting, where we intended sure we have blinds so the
to use a office we had lighting doesn’t affect the
resulted to using a filming. Because it doesn’t
classroom and when we help the edting.
was going thought the
editing you could tell it was
official. The lighting could
have been less.
Quality of editing so that Match cuts was ok but got a Use a Varity of shots. So
meaning is apparent to the little tedious the same as the blends and flows together.
viewer framing of the shots.
Quality of using sound with There wasn’t any sound Add sound o add to the
images and editing added to the clip so audiences experience and
appropriately for the task set; therefore it didn’t link but on also brings in atmosphere.
the other hand the body And point out who’s weak
language was formal and and who’s strong at editing so
our short film was a job it saves time and the editing
interview so therefore linked is the same.
together with the genre.

2. Quality of positioning and There wasn’t any moving Actors wasn’t good actors but
movements of actors after the editing only a little. didn’t expect them to be but if
This is because at the ends more movement it would of
the filming got cut off so looked a bit more
there fore could see the professional.
actors walking off the scene.
Handshake was ok but
could have had better
editing skills.
Quality of group planning, Organization was ok. Go by our timetable and work
meeting targets, organization Planning it was good but out who’s free and when. And
then we thought we was sett weekly targets for
going to film in an office but everyone so we can work out
didn’t s that wasn’t who’s slacking within the
organized. We didn’t group.
achieve targets because not
everyone was present on
the right days.
Group dynamics i.e. how did Our group together worked Less distraction and get to
your group work together well when we needed to but the point and don’t waste as
all get easily distracted. much time.
Other points of evaluation More organization for props Organize things pre-hand.
(e.g. equipment related etc) etc.