Preliminary Task Evaluation

161 views

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
161
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
6
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Preliminary Task Evaluation

  1. 1. PRELIMINARY EVALUATION SHEETQuality of Summary My honest evaluation- what Strategies put forward to was done well and what was make sure a high quality is not of good standard? Try to maintained. cite specific example and moments from your video.Quality of holding a shot Throughout the preliminary Purchase and use a tripod.steady task, there were points where the camera would be shaky. This is due to the use of a small iPhone 4 camera. However this camera is necessary to use as it is high definition.Quality of the framing shots The shots were framed well, Straighten camera and make as we encaptured the it less shaky. (Tripod). scenery to make it look as if it were a police interrogation cell.Quality of shooting material We accurately followed the Make conversations moreappropriate to the task set- task set, and in doing so our fluent (improve editing).i.e. the content of your film production was well done.pre and post editing wasconsistent with the examdirectivesQuality of selecting mise-en- The lighting was good for Remove unnecessary mis enscène including colour, figure, the scene. The filing cabinet scene.lighting, objects and setting; also added to the scenery of being a police interrogation room.Quality of editing so that The editing was done well to Take more shots to havemeaning is apparent to the an extent, although it was more options to edit from.viewer not fluent enough.Quality of using sound with The only apparent Add SFX ie. Telephoneimages and editing foreground sounds were sounds and backgroundappropriately for the task set; those of the characters conversations. speaking and the slamming down of the newspaper.Quality of positioning and The positioning of actors More actors.movements of actors was good, as we were able to see the superiority of each character.Quality of group planning, Organization as weak, More predominantmeeting targets, organization filmed the task on same day organizing. Work around a of editing. timetable.
  2. 2. Group dynamics i.e. how did The group worked well with Again, work toward ayour group work together each-other, we were often in timetable to keep contact, and we were able to organization. fill in for each-other if one was not in.Other points of evaluation Need a tri-pod.( e.g. equipment related etc)

×