1. PRELIMINARY EVALUATION SHEET
Quality of Summary My honest evaluation- what Strategies put forward to make
was done well and what sure a high quality is
was not of good standard? maintained.
Try to cite specific example
and moments from your
video
Quality of holding a shot Quality was at a good We made sure the camera
steady standard, it was steady but was held firmly especially
did move slightly but that when taking shots of the face
did not affect the filming. and over the shoulder shots
Filming face shots were being taken. We did not film
well maintained and over 180 degrees limit to keep
captured clearly. the film in good range.
Quality of the framing shots Framing shots was taken in We made sure that we
good quality, however if the maintained a good camera
camera was slightly more balance. The camera had to
balance, the quality of the be steady as we took face
shots would look more camera shots and over the
professional. shoulder shots.
Quality of shooting material The shooting material was To achieve the best and most
appropriate to the task set- appropriate to the task set. appropriate quality of the
i.e. the content of your film The consistency and shooting material we laid out a
pre and post editing was quality was excellent as we plan, which we followed
consistent with the exam related back to the exam consistently.
directives directives as we went
along.
Quality of selecting mise-en- The shooting was well We made sure that we all
scène including colour, figure, planned by our organizer stuck to our plans and we had
lighting, objects and setting; and it was decided that we a script ready and revised and
would film in a very bright a time limit on how long we
and lighted location to get would film.
maximum quality. We kept
the setting simple.
Quality of editing so that The editing was really We made sure we kept the
meaning is apparent to the good, due to the camera camera filming exceptional so
viewer quality of the filming it that the editing would be quick
made the editing not too and simple. Also we made
difficult and the shots form sure we did not film for too
scene to scene was simply long so there was no waste
edited. needed to be cutted out.
Quality of using sound with The quality of sound was The group made sure that we
images and editing good and understandable had the actors speaking loud
appropriately for the task set; but it could have been and clear after each speech
clearer as we should have but we could of improved by
increased the volume of speaking louder.
the sound.

2. Quality of positioning and The positional quality was To achieve the high quality
movements of actors good as it was simple, the and the best form out of the
actors were in one place. actors, we practiced and acted
The movement of the out the scene before actually
actors as a character filming.
would walk in and speak
was really excellent as it
expressed what was
happening.
Quality of group planning, Our group was well The organizer gave everyone
meeting targets, organization organized and the planning an important role to follow out
was excellent as we all which made the task simple.
followed through the plan
and meeting the targets.
Group dynamics i.e. how did The group worked really Everyone wanted to get to
your group work together well together, we quickly understand each other and we
formed together and all were confident enough to
connected which made the talk to each other.
task easier.
Other points of evaluation No major equipment was We wanted to keep the task
( e.g. equipment related etc) used or needed apart from simple and clear.
bringing in glasses for a
character.
Quality of holding a shot steady Quality of the framing shots

3. Quality of holding a shot steady Quality of editing
Quality of selecting mise-en-scène including colour, figure, lighting, objects and setting;