1. Quality of summary My honest evaluation what was done well and what was not of good standard?Use specific example and moments from your video Strategies put forward to make sure a high quality is maintained.Quality of holding shot steadyI think the shot was reasonably steady as we used a tripod for most of our shots.When we showed the officer walking in I think that was shown well and was a good steady shot.Quality of framing shotsMost of the shots were well framed well but some seemed to miss out small bits of the actors and not get all the background in we wanted.When the two were sitting at table together the camera frame need to be better as we did not get the whole of both of them in.Quality of shooting material appropriate to the task set – i.e. the content of your film pre and post editing was consistent with the exam directives.The editing is slopping in some places and jumps around which can be improved but we followed the directions of the brief closely.Quality of selecting mise-en-scene including colour, figure, lighting, objects and setting.With the mise-en-scene we managed to find a reasonably good room to use and the lighting was ok although we didn’t alter these.Showing the officer walking into the room with a close up on her hand and the passing of the piece of paper showed we used out surroundings.Quality of editing so that meaning is appropriate to the viewer.The editing is a bit jumpy in places, which would in the final task need to be improved.At the beginning as the officer walks in the cuts are not precise and clean so some meaning is lost.Quality of using sound with images and editing appropriately for the next task set.There was no extra sound added to the video. Not all the sound and images were edited together properly so that can be improved next time.There is no extra sound in our task but adding this would make it a more enjoyable to watch.Quality of positioning and movement of actors.I think the characters were positioned in a good way and moved well; it was just the editing that let this down.As the officer sits down she moves well and stands over the victim to help show authority.Quality of group planning, meeting targets, organisationI don’t think our group was very well organized and on the day of shooting we were missing two group members.For the main film our group planning and organization needs to be a lot tighter as we suffered due to having only two of us.Group dynamics, i.e. how did your group work togetherI think we worked together well and shared ideas; we just needed everyone to be there.Other points of evaluation (e.g. equipment related etc)